2017-2018Operations Manual

College and Texas A&M AgriLifePeer Review Committee

College of Agriculture and Life SciencesTexas A&M AgriLife Research

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

2

Table of Contents

Role and Operating Protocol............................................................................................3

Peer Review Committee Members...................................................................................5

Calendar .............................................................................................................................6

Forms and Templates

Reviewer Assignments...................................................................................................9

Committee Report Format and Template....................................................................10

Rubrics – Why use?.....................................................................................................12Example – Rubric Based on Metrics.....................................................................13Example – Rubric Based on Expectations.............................................................14

Voting Ballot TemplatesCollege...................................................................................................................15AgriLife Research & AgriLife Extension..............................................................16Mid-Term Review..................................................................................................17

Resources: Policies and Guidelines

College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee resources web site..............19

Faculty resources web site.................................................................................................19

3

Role and Operating ProtocolCollege and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee

The Dean of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and the Directors of Texas A&M AgriLife Research and the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service use the College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee to review all requests for promotion/tenure from departments and off-campus research units. The committee reviews all promotion and tenure recommendations and ensures equitable review and evaluation of on- and off-campus promotion candidates, relative to the position description and job expectation for each candidate and the evaluation criteria in teaching, research, service and extension published by the college and agencies guidelines.

The College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee will be comprised of 16 senior faculty members at the rank of Professor appointed by the Vice Chancellor, in consultation with the Dean, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Director, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; and Director, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service. The makeup of the committee will reflect the composition of the faculty within the College, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, and the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, and will be reviewed every three years to ensure it continues to represent the demographics of the faculty. Committee members shall serve two-year terms, with approximately one-half of the committee rotating each year. As with the departmental peer review committees, all members of the College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee may vote on promotion and tenure decisions; however, the vote of the tenured faculty on tenure decisions is the vote of record and must be recorded separately for votes on tenure-track or tenured faculty candidates. The results of the committee’s anonymous vote and the overall assessment of the committee relative to each faculty member under consideration shall be explained by the Chair of the Committee in a committee report to the Dean and Vice Chancellor.

The College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee shall review all promotion and tenure Dossiers in accordance with the following:

1. Review completeness of promotion/tenure candidate’s file. The committee may request additional information, if necessary, particularly if the candidate’s department or unit is not represented on the committee.

2. Requests for additional information:a. All requests will be made by the Chair directly to the Associate Dean and administrative staff

managing the tenure and promotion process.b. The Chair and committee members cannot directly approach the candidate, Department Head,

Resident Director, departmental faculty, the departmental tenure and promotion committee, or external letter writers.

3. Review of Dossiers: Each member of the College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee will review the complete Dossier of each candidate. a. The Committee Chair may appoint sub-committees to carefully review selected Dossiers and

prepare a draft report to be presented to the committee of the whole. The sub-committee will re-draft the report to reflect the discussion and opinions of the committee of the whole.

b. The final report on each candidate will be submitted to the Chair, and the Chair will sign the final report to verify that the vote and comments reflect the opinions of the committee of the whole.

c. The Committee should focus on nominations of a marginal nature. Specifically:1. If the departmental peer review committee and the Head strongly recommend a decision and

the College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee does not concur, then the College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee may request further input prior to a final recommendation. Detailed comments should accompany all College and Texas A&M

4

AgriLife Peer Review Committee recommendations which are in opposition to the recommendations of the departmental peer review committee or administration.

2. If the departmental peer review committee and the Head are in direct conflict, the College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee should carefully review the entire file, including external letters, to determine the merits of the file. If necessary, the College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee may invite the appropriate Department Head (and respective Resident Director, as appropriate) and/or the chair of the departmental peer review committee to the meeting to gain further information.

4. Voting:a. Voting will be conducted in such a way that the individual votes are anonymous and are known

only to the person verifying and recording the votes, usually the Chair or the administrative staff assisting with the tenure and promotion process.

b. The votes of the committee will be reported by: a) tenured TAMU members, b) non-tenured AgriLife Extension, c) non-tenured AgriLife Research members, and d) total vote.For decisions on tenure-track candidates (promotion from Assistant Professor to Associate Professor, tenure only decisions, and tenure upon hire ) or tenured candidates (promotion from Associate Professor to Professor), only the vote of the tenured College members are reported on the Dossier cover sheet, but a complete tally of votes should be reported in the Committee report.

c. Abstain, Absent and Recuse Votes: Abstain and absent votes are discouraged. A committee member may recuse themselves from the vote if they feel that have a justifiable reason.Abstain vote = To refrain from something by one’s own choice. May have inadequate

information or expertise to make an informed decision, did not read the dossier, did not take part in discussion, etc.

Recuse vote = To disqualify from participation in a decision on grounds such as prejudice, personal involvement or conflict of interest. Person should not take part in discussion; and probably should leave the room. For example, a spouse.

d. For decisions on tenured or tenure track faculty, each voting member can vote only once. Therefore, the voting member of the College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee should abstain from the departmental vote so they can register a vote on the College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee. If they do chose to vote at the departmental level, then they should abstain from the Peer Review Committee vote.

e. In order to be eligible to vote, University policy dictates that each committee member reads the material in the Dossier. Subcommittees may review selected Dossiers in detail and prepare a draft report or recommendation to the committee of the whole, but this does not excuse each committee member from personally reviewing the Dossier information.

5. The Committee Report: The report must contain the vote of committee members along with written explanation and justification. The report should follow all the instructions contained in the University policy on Dossier guidelines. See the Committee Report Format for detailed instructions.

6. Report to Dean/Directors: The Chair of the College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee will be responsible for transmitting written results of the committee’s deliberations to the Dean and Directors, or the Associate Dean/Director assigned to receive the report.

7. Improve the Process: At the conclusion of each year’s process, the committee is encouraged to make recommendations regarding changes that could improve the process.

5

2016-2017 College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee

Composition

On-Campus Departmentalized

Off-Campus Departmentalized

On- or Off-Campus Non

DepartmentalizedSub-Total

TAMU 7 7AgriLife Research 4 4AgriLife Extension 2 2 1 5

Total 16

Name College/Agency Department Location Term Phone Email

Rhonda Miller, Chair College ANSC Campus Year 2 979-845-3901 rmiller@tamu.eduDavid Briske College ESSM Campus Year 2 979-845-5581 dbriske@tamu.eduJim Petrick College RPTS Campus Year 2 979-845-8806 jpetrick@tamu.eduRob Chapkin College NFSC Campus Year 1 979-845-0419 r-chapkin@tamu.eduJohn Carey College POSC Campus Year 1 979-847-7344 jcarey@poultry.tamu.eduJohn Mullet College BCBP Campus Year 1 979-845-0722 jmullet@tamu.eduDan Roelke College WFSC Campus Year 1 979-845-5777 droelke@tamu.edu

On-Campus Departmentalized - Total 2David Anderson AgriLife Extension AGEC Campus Year 2 979-845-4351 danderson@tamu.eduKevin Ong AgriLife Extension PLPM Campus Year 1 979-845-8032 kevo@tamu.eduOff-Campus Departmentalized - Total 2Bruce Carpenter AgriLife Extension ANSC Fort Stockton Year 2 432-336-8585 bruce.carpenter@ag.tamu.eduScott Cummings AgriLife Extension ALEC Campus Year 1 979-847-9388 s-cummings@tamu.edu On-Off-Campus Non-Departmentalized - Total 1 James Cathey AgriLife Extension IRNR Campus Year 1 979-845-1851 jccathey@tamu.edu

John Jifon AgriLife Research HORT Weslaco Year 2 956-969-5643 jljifon@ag.tamu.eduMark Burrow AgriLife Research SCSC Lubbock Year 2 806-746-6101 mburow@tamu.eduZhuping Sheng AgriLife Research BAEN El Paso Year 1 915-859-9111 z-sheng@tamu.eduForrest Mitchell AgriLife Research  ENTO Stephenville Year 1 254-968-4144 ext228 FMitchel@ag.tamu.edu ContactsDavid Wm. Reed Oversees Proceedure, Process and Compliance 979-458-0710 dwreed@tamu.eduJulie Wilson Primary Organiation and Protocol Contact 979-845-4756 jdwilson@tamu.eduRoyce Stengele Recorder 979-458-5705 royce.stengele@ag.tamu.edu

RepresentationDepartment College AgriLife Extension AgriLife Research TotalAGEC 1 1ALEC 1 1ANSC 1 1 2BCBP 1 1BAEN 1 1ESSM 1 1ENTO 1 1HORT 1 1NFSC 1 1PPLM 1 1POSC 1 1RPTS 1 1SCSC 1 1WFSC 1 1Non-Dept 1 1

Total 16

Texas A&M University - Total 7

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension- Total 5

Texas A&M AgriLife Research - Total 4

6

College of Agriculture and Life SciencesTexas A&M AgriLife ResearchTexas A&M AgriLife Extension

2017-18 Promotion and Tenure CalendarCollege of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M

AgriLife Research, and Texas A&M AgriLife ExtensionPromotion and Tenure WorkshopsDean of Faculties WorkshopsFall 2017 time & place TBA Dean of Faculties New Faculty Orientation – Colleges SessionMarch 23, 1:30–3:30 PM, Demystifying the Tenure and Promotion Process. Rudder 601 This workshop will provide an overview of the tenure and promotion process at

Texas A&M University. The topics discussed will be useful to faculty at all stages of their career, especially those in the process of putting together their dossier.

March 27, 10-12 PM, Academic Professional Track Promotions. Rudder 601 This workshop will provide an overview of the promotion process at Texas A&M

University for Academic Professional Track Faculty. The topics discussed will be useful to those in the process of putting together their dossier.

March 29, 1:30-3:30 PM, Is this the Right Time or Not? Preparing for Promotion to Full Professor Rudder 601 Faculty at the rank of associate professor often receive mixed signals about when

and how they should prepare their dossier to be promoted to full professor.  Many associate professors, especially underrepresented faculty, such as women and ethnic minorities, remain intimidated from their experiences with earning tenure.  These experiences can be obstacles to promotion.  When is it time to think about promotion?  Which criteria are used during the assessment of this promotion phase?  What role can mentoring play in this process? 

College and AgriLife WorkshopsJanuary 9, 10-12 PM, Understanding the Promotion and Tenure Process Rudder 401 Understanding procedure and process, faculty peer and administrator expectations

for promotion and tenure, and characteristics of successful and unsuccessful dossiers. The program is applicable for faculty in the College, AgriLife Research, and AgriLife Extension, and for faculty going for tenure, promotion to Associate or promotion to Professor.

March 29, 3-5 PM, Administrative Dossier Preparation Workshop AGLS 129 For Heads, Resident Directors, P&T Chairs and staff involved in preparing

Dossiers packets for submission.April 5, 3-5 PM, Candidate Dossier Preparation Workshop AGLS 129 For candidates preparing their Dossier for submission this cycleTBA ADEPT Workshop

This is a dynamic and interactive workshop designed specifically for department heads and P&T committee members. The workshop focuses on a broad range of biases that impact the faculty evaluation process, and will share skills to mitigate the impact of such biases. 

August, place & time TBA Administrative Check-Off List Workshop: Final workshop for assuring compliance of the final dossier package. For Heads, Resident Directors, P&T Chairs and staff involved in preparing final Dossiers.

Anytime Mentoring Beyond the DepartmentOne-on-one meeting with Dave Reed, dwreed@tamu.edu; answer questions, explain the process, review CV, discuss strategy relative to timing, etc.

Midterm Review TimelinesFebruary-March Department Informs Candidate: Department informs candidate of upcoming

review and instructs them to start putting together packets using the latest Dossier preparation guidelines: http://aglifesciences.tamu.edu/faculty-staff/promotion-tenure/

As per Dept. timeline Candidate submits Dossier components to Department: The candidate submits their Dossier components to the Head/Resident Director and/or Chair Departmental P&T Committee

7

As per Dept. timeline Departmental Review: Departmental P&T Committee, then Head and Resident Director review Dossier, and insert reports.

May 26 COB Department submits Dossier package to College: (including candidate’s CV, separate Statements on Teaching, Research and Service, Dept P&T Committee report, Head/Resident Director report(s), and any items in Item 13)

May 30-31 College vets Dossiers: College vets for compliance with current Dossier preparation guidelines; sends check-off list to departments

June 2 COB Department corrects and submits final version of Dossier to College July 18 – August 15 College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee: Reviews and

prepares reports.August 18 College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee: Issues report to

Dean/Director.August Dean, Director and Administrative Team: Review DossiersEnd of August Dean, Director and Administrative Team: Issues report to Head to inform each

candidate.Early September Post-Review Mentoring: At the discretion of the candidate, the College mentors

mid-term candidates towards the perspective at the College-Agency Peer Review committee-level.

Promotion and Tenure (Mandatory) Review Timelines:February-March Department Informs Candidate: Department informs candidate of upcoming

review and instructs them to start putting together packets using the latest Dossier preparation guidelines: http://aglifesciences.tamu.edu/faculty-staff/promotion-tenure/

As per Dept. timeline Candidate submits Dossier components to Department: The candidate submits their Dossier components to the Head/Resident Director and/or Departmental P&T CommitteeDepartmental Review: Departmental P&T Committee, then Head and Resident Director (if applicable) review Dossier, and insert reports.

September 22 COB Department submits bookmarked PDF of Dossier to College: (including candidate’s CV, separate Statements on Teaching, Research, Service, Extension, and other material, Dept. P&T Committee report, Head/Resident Director report(s), and external letters)

September 25-27 College vets Dossiers: College vets Dossiers for compliance with the current Dossier guidelines; return to Department to make corrections.

September 29 COB Department returns corrected final Dossier to College: One bookmarked PDF of Dossier.

October 2 – November 15 College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee: Reviews TAMU Dossiers and prepares reports to the Dean.

October TBA Dept submits to Dean’s office: PDF of CV; Excel file of External Reviewers Chart and Grant Summary Chart; Word file of Biography and Summary Data Table and candidate’s photo.

November 7 Dean submits to DOF: Electronic copies of College chart (no need for College P&T and Dean’s vote at this time), Faculty Biography Table, Faculty Summary Data Table and External Reviewers Chart.

November 15 College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee Submits to Dean: Final report

November 15–December 4 Dean, Executive Associate Dean & Administrative Team: Reviews TAMU Dossiers. Dean communicates with Department Head on contrary vote cases. Head may resubmit case; if so, Ag Peer Review committee re-reviews case.

December 5 Dean submits to DOF: Recommendations to the provost by sending electronic and hard copy files of all candidates.

November-December College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee: Reviews AgriLife Research and AgriLife Extension Dossiers and prepares reports for the Dossier

By end of Semester College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee: Submits Final reports to the College.

8

December Agency Directors: Review AgriLife Research and AgriLife Extension Dossiers, inform Head of results, and issues report to the Vice-Chancellor.

9

Forms and Templates

10

Reviewer Assignments

Reviewer AssignmentsCollege and Texas AgriLife Peer Review Committee

Texas A&M University Committee Member Reviewer AssignemtnReviewer 1* Reviewer 2 Reviewer 3

Name Promotion to Tenure Agency Department Location* College Extension ResearchCollegeCollegeCollegeCollegeCollegeCollegeCollegeCollegeCollegeCollegeCollege

AgriLife ExtensionReviewer 1** Reviewer 2 Reviewer 3

Name Agency Department Location* Extension College ResearchExtensionExtensionExtensionExtensionExtensionExtensionExtensionExtensionExtensionExtension

AgriLife ResearchReviewer 1** Reviewer 2 Reviewer 3

Name Agency Department Location* Research Extension CollegeResearchResearchResearchResearchResearchResearchResearchResearchResearchResearch

*List Campus or Loaction pf AREC**Note: Reviewer 1 is the primary reviewer, and has an ad loc similar to the candidate.

Consider For

Consider For

Consider For

Promotion to

Promotion to

11

College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee Report

If the decision to promote and/or grant tenure is unanimous or near unanimous at all levels, then an extensive report IS NOT needed. If there are negative votes, then the major reasons for the negative votes must be pointed out. The overall committee report recommendation must be in balance with the vote of the voting members.

Report the Vote at the top of the committee report by: Tenured TAMUNon-Tenure Track TAMUNon-Tenure Track AgriLife ResearchNon-Tenure Track AgriLife ExtensionTotal Committee

Official Vote Reported on Cover Sheet (“yes” or “no” is based on a simple majority)o For TAMU candidates, tenured or tenure track, the vote of the tenured TAMU

members is the official vote reported on the Dossier cover sheet. o For TAMU candidates, non-tenure track, the vote of the tenure and non-tenure track

TAMU members is the official vote reported on the Dossier cover sheet.o For AgriLife Extension and AgriLife Research candidates, the official vote is the vote

of the total committee, which is recorded on the Dossier cover sheet. Committee Report should contain separate paragraphs that address:

Do NOT restate or summarize accomplishments from the CV; rather present summative/evaluative statements.o List a table at top of the report that give the vote by the categories listed aboveo Possibly, an introductory paragraph summarizing the votes at all levels.o A paragraph that addresses Teachingo A paragraph that addresses Researcho A paragraph that addresses Extension (for Extension candidates only)o A paragraph that addresses Service.o Possibly a paragraph summarizing the comments of outsider reviewers.o A bulleted list or paragraph that highlights major areas of strength and major areas of

concern, and the overall committee vote and recommendation.o TAMU cases: All voting committee members sign the report

Instructions from the Dean of Faculties 2017-18 Dossier Submission Guidelines.http://dof.tamu.edu/dof/media/PITO-DOF/Documents/Guidelines/hiring/2017-2018-TAMU-T-P-Guidelines_3.pdfA. College Committee Report and Recommendation (Dossier Item 11)DescriptionSimilar to the department P&T committee discussion report and recommendations (Dossier Item 9), this document should reflect the committee discussion, primary issues that convinced members to vote one way or the other and the final committee vote. The vote of the committee in a table format (i.e. number of yes, no, abstain, absent, recused, total eligible) must be included in the report and all committee members should review the contents of the committee report. Members should indicate their agreement with what is stated in the report, and that the document reflects their discussion and voting outcome. This should be done by having all voting committee members sign the report.IMPORTANT: The names, title and department for all committee members should be included in the report.

12

Example of a Format Used by Past Committees

Report of the College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee

Dr. name of candidate Department or Unit:_____________________

Yes NoAbsen

tAbstain Recuse

Total Eligible

Appointments

0 0 0 0 0 Tenured TAMU0 0 0 0 0 Non-Tenure Track TAMU0 0 0 0 0 Non-tenured AgriLife Research0 0 0 0 0 Non-tenured AgriLife Extension0 0 0 0 0 Total committee

Draft a paragraph that briefly addresses each of the following. Specifically point out in which areas they meet the normal expectations and areas in which they do not. Remember: DO NOT restate or summarize accomplishments from the CV; rather present summative/evaluative statements.o Possibly, an introductory paragraph summarizes the votes at all levels.o A paragraph that addresses Teaching (1st paragraph for College appointments)o A paragraph that addresses Research (1st paragraph for AgriLife Research appointments)o For Extension appointments only, a paragraph that addresses Extension (1st paragraph for

AgriLife Extension appointments)o A paragraph that addresses Serviceo Possibly a paragraph summarizing the comments of outsider reviewers, but this could be

incorporated into the Teaching, Research or Extension/Service paragraphs.

Areas Strength: list list

Areas of Concern: list list

In summary, by a vote of ____ yes, _____ no, _____ absent, _____ abstain and ____ recuse, the Peer Review Committee recommends give overall recommendation.

I verify that this report reflects the discussion and voting outcome of the voting members of the Peer Review Committee.

__________________, Chair

List voting members, and have each sign.

13

Rubrics

Why use a Rubric?

It is important to develop a consistent and systematic approach to your evaluation of the promotion and tenure Dossiers. One way to do this is to develop and use a scoring rubric.

Use of a rubric promotes a holistic approach to the decision making process and fosters consistency of evaluation, while still preserving the value of those core attributes necessary for promotion and tenure.

Advantages of using a Rubric Allows one to base their decision on the sum of a full range of criteria as opposed to a

few key criteria. Allows consistency in evaluation of multiple packets. Development of your own evaluation rubric allows you to reflect upon which metrics,

characteristics and/or accomplishments you place the greatest emphasis.All of this leads to a fair, consistent and defendable decision.

Develop your own rubric Consider developing your own rubric. The following are examples of several rubrics that others have developed.

14

elsewhere TAMUS elsewhere TAMUS Total years in rankYears in Rank

Check Expectation

TEACHING Number Below Meets Above CommentsUndergraduate courses/yearGraduate courses/yearStudent Evaluations

Dept Average% of Dept Average

UG Students Advised

GRADUATE STUDENT TRAININGChair/Co-Chair: MastersChair/Co-Chair: PhDCommittee: MastersCommittee: PhD

PUBLICATIONS and SCHOLARLY WORKRefereed Journal Articles

Since Last PromotionSenior AuthorGraduate Students Authors

AbstractsNon-Refereed/Editor reviewed Books/ChaptersExtension/Industry Publications

GRANTS AND CONTRACTS (allocated to your program) to neasest $50kExternal Competitive Total $Internal Competitive Total $ Since Last Promotion for Professor External Competitive Total $ Internal Competitive Total $Gifts-in-kind $Other $

SIGNIFICANT RECOGNITION# Awards and HonorsSociety Officer, Editor, Fellow, etc.

SIGNIFICANT SERVICE ACTIVITIESDepartmentCollege/AgencyUniversityScientific SocietySociety / Public

Assistant Associate

Example of a Metrics Rubric

15

Teaching Below Meets Above CommentsStudent EvaluationsTeach Undergrad and Grad coursesPeer Evaluation of teachingTeaching improvement activitiesTeaching proportional to appointmentStudent evaluations improve over timeGraduate Chair Masters and PhDMember of Graduate CommitteesNew Unique Courses DevelopedAwards teachingStudent Advising

ResearchArticles - peer-reviewed/refereedArticles non-peer reviewedAbstracts/presentations @ sci. meetingsGraduate students publishGraduate student trainingGrants-competitive (to maintain program)Team/Collaborative researchInvolvement in societies/meetingsEvidence regional,nat/internat recognitionPotential for national recognitionImpact of ResearchPatents, copyrights, releases Awards Research

Extension and ServiceScholarly extension appropriate publ.Grants-competitive (to maintain program)Involvement in societies/meetingsDemonstrate impact of programmingRegional and state recognitionService activities within TAMUDeliver info based on scienceGraduate student trainingArticles Peer-reviewed/refereedDemonstrate demand for programsInvolvement: commodity/industry groupsTeam/collaborative relationshipsPotential for national recognition

Check Expectation

Generic Rubric Based on Expectations

16

Candidates Name Department Promotion to Tenure Yes No Absent Abstain Recuse

Check which applies to you: Check Appointment adloc

tenure track TAMU

non-tenure track AgriLife Research

AgriLife Extension

(bottom section will be cut and removed once verified)

To Verify as a Member, Agriculture and Life Sciences Peer Review Committee:

Print Your Name Date

Return to: _____, Chair ________, Staff

Address Ag Life Sciences Buidling, Rm 515

email email

Consider For VOTE (check only one)

Confidential

VOTING BALLOTCollege and Texas AgriLife Peer Review Committee

TAMU Candidates

17

Candidates Name Department Promotion to Tenure Yes No Absent Abstain Recuse

AgriLife Research

AgriLife Extension

Check which applies to you: Check Appointment adloc

tenure track TAMU

non-tenure track AgriLife ResearchAgriLife Extension

(bottom section will be cut and removed once verified)

To Verify as a Member, Agriculture and Life Sciences Peer Review Committee:

Print Your Name Date

Return to: _____, Chair ________, StaffAddress Ag Life Sciences Buidling, Rm 515

email email

Consider For

Confidential

VOTING BALLOTCollege and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee

AgriLife Agency Candidates

VOTE (check only one)

18

19

Resources:

Web Sites

20

College and Texas A&M AgriLife Peer Review Committee Web Sitehttp://aglifesciences.tamu.edu/people/facultystaff/tenure-review/

The web page has all the information, forms and examples you will need.

Faculty Resources Web Sitehttp://aglifesciences.tamu.edu/faculty-staff/promotion-tenure/

Contains all the information candidates need to prepare their dossiers.