operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

13
Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration? Gilles Van Cutsem MD, DTMH, MPH Medecins Sans Frontieres

Upload: base

Post on 19-Jan-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?. Gilles Van Cutsem MD, DTMH, MPH Medecins Sans Frontieres. Key characteristics. Clear agenda informed by global priorities Enhanced monitoring and evaluation: Strong district-level coordination - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Gilles Van Cutsem MD, DTMH, MPHMedecins Sans Frontieres

Page 2: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Key characteristics• Clear agenda informed by global priorities• Enhanced monitoring and evaluation:

– Strong district-level coordination– Ongoing supervision, mentoring and training– Communication between M&E, clinicians, and management

• Partnership with government health services• Strong academic collaborations (UCT, US, …)• Balancing exercise between service delivery

and research priorities

Page 3: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Guiding principles

1. Relevance and benefit to the community 2. Patient care is not disrupted3. Involvement of local health care providers:

capacity building and local interest 4. Synergy and coherence between projects5. Integration within routine health services6. Contribution to service delivery

Page 4: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Virtuous cycle

Page 5: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Study designs

• Observational cohorts (prospective)• Retrospective cohort (folder reviews)• Model descriptions• Validation and field-testing of diagnostics• Pragmatic trials• Other nested within cohort:

– PK– Cost-efficiency

Page 6: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

How is this different from usual?

• ‘Real world’ setting – generalizability• Constant interaction between operations and

research > one informs the other.• NGO & public health sector: no publication

pressure as opposed to academic > less conflict of interest between service delivery and research demands

• Research as a second job: capacity problem

Page 7: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

•First description of ART at PHC in Africa•Use of enhanced routine data•Observational cohort – quantitative •Model of care - descriptive

Page 8: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Advocacy for new models of care

Page 9: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Sentinel surveillance informing policy0.

000.

050.

100.

150.

20

0 6 12 18 24 30 36

Months on ART

Kaplan-Meier failure estimate

d4T

AZT

NVP

EFV

Prop

ortio

n ch

ange

d du

e to

to

xici

ty

Page 10: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Project-driven clinical questions

Page 11: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Field testing of TB diagnostics

Feasibility, impact and cost-efficiency of decentralizing molecular testing for detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance using XpertTM MTB/Rif

Page 12: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Large research projects

• Tuberculosis drug resistance survey• Randomized controlled trial of isoniazid

vs placebo

Page 13: Operations versus research: cohabitation or collaboration?

Ubuntu Clinic Research Committee

• Protect services from research chaos• Composed of MoH, NGO, academia• Evaluate impact on service delivery & overall

cohesion (guiding principles)• Empower ‘coal-face’ workers to have their say

in what is happening in their clinic