optimization of biosensor based on interdigitated conductimetric electrodes for the determination of...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
Optimization of biosensor based on interdigitated conductimetric
electrodes for the determination of polluting flux in hyporheic zones
Ph. Namour1, M. Marrakchi2, S. Dzyadevych2, F. Ruysschaert1, C. Martelet2, N. Jaffrezic-Renault2
1 Cemagref, 3 bis quai Chauveau, 69336 Lyon cedex 09, France2 CEGELY, UMR-CNRS 5005, ECL-Lyon, 69134 Ecully cedex, France
2/19
Presentation outline• Problematic
– Objectives – Measure in hyporheic zone– A definition of organic matter
• Biosensor– Principle & structure– Optimization – First assessments
• Conclusion• Perspectives
3/19
Objectifs
To measure OM assimilation in hyporheic zones
Organic matter & hyporheic flows
Design & optimization of a biosensor to measure protein in porous media
To quantify OM fluxes=
= to quantify
Problematic
4/19
downwelling
upwelling
inwelling
outwelling
Harvey & Wagner 2000
Flows in the hyporheon:
influence of geomorphological units
Problematic
5/19
surf
ace
hyp
orh
eon
high [O2]
very low or no [O2]
Aerobiosis
Anaerobiosis
NO3-
NH4+
to upstream
dm to m
m to hm
Commonly low in O2 depending on
geology, land use and organic
matter
gro
un
d-w
ate
rs
Fe2+
Fe3+
Hyporheon
Direction of ground-water flows from Winter et al. 1998
Problematic
6/19
A definition of OM ?
No chemical definition !
Need to use a proxyProteins (30% of total COD)
Proteins as a proxy of OM
Problematic
7/19
AmplifierElectronics
instrumentation
Biosensor
BioreceptorSample Transducer Signal Information
Enzyme
Proteinase K
Platinum interdigitat
ed thin films
electrodes
Principle
Principle of biosensorElectronic board
8/19
Conductometric Conductometric measurementsmeasurements
( Platinum electrode )
ProteinsProteinase K
Amino-acids
Charge variation
Principle
Mechanism of bioreceptor
9/19
Co-reticulation of the enzyme with a bi-functional agent:the glutaraldehyde.
Insoluble biopolymer
E N CH CH2 CH N P3
E N C
H
O
CH2 CO
H3 N P
albumineenzyme
H2H2
Membrane preparation
Principle
10/19
Platinum
Glass
Protection Resin
Platinum connections
10 µm
10 µm
GlassPt electrode (Height 0.2 µm)
Preparation of biosensor
a micro-drop of mixture
Enzyme 2%
Bovine Serum Albumine 3%
Glycerol 5%
20 mM PO4 buffer pH 7.5
Structure
Micro-sensor design
20 Microelectrode insert( 8)
60 Electronic board ( 10)
10 Sensing area
Designed by PIMMA
Input signal
Converted in alternating current
Frequency: 100 kHz
Amplitude: 10 mV
Output signal
Differential measurement
Digitized by the board
Structure
Optimisation of the procedure for elaboration of the enzymatic membrane
Effect of the contact time with glutaraldehyde vapour
Twenty minutes is the optimal contact time.Optimization
Calibration curve for detection of BSA
The range of sensitivity obtained (0.2 to 8 mg/L) is in accordance with the values of the actual concentrations of proteins in hyporheic
water.Optimization
14/19
two zones:
zone “a”: response decreasing: leaching of certain molecules of enzymes not well adhering on the surface of the membrane;
zone “b”: the response is quite stable for more than one month.
Stability
Optimization
15/19
Sensor response versus microBCA method (river & sewer waters)
First assessments
6.6 Nmg/L
0.3 Nmg/L 0.2 Nmg/L
We have shown the feasibility of a microsensor based on interdigitated microelectrodes in the case of measurements of Organic Matter content (proteins). Concentration range for BSA between 0.2 to 8 mg/L, in accordance with the real concentrations of proteins in hyporheic water.
Conclusion
Conclusion
Repeatability = 3.3% & sensibility = 0.88 µS/mg
Stability = more than one month (in laboratory)
17/19
ISO 5725River water & wastewaters
Standard additionsAccuracy (trueness, precision)
StabilityReproducibility
Validation in laboratory
Perspectives
18/19
Continuous monitoring along a riffle, downstream a sewer overflow
hyporheon
micro-sensor “piezometer”perforated measurement room with micro-electrodes
riffle
Perspectives
19/19
This work was financially supported in the framework of NMAC
concerted action of French ministry
research, priority thematic action of
Rhone-Alpes region and NATO LST.CLG.980843
Acknowledgements
24/19
Which instrumentation ?
Spatial scale :
Constraint: To respect metric of studied phenomena
mm3-cm3
microorganisms, invertebrates
km2
catchments
transient phenomenone.g. : overflow
Long term trends
e.g. : global change
Time scale :
27/19
Need for remove this lag time
But what is an “in situ measurement” ?
by an in situ measurement
The Protein Biosensor
Microconductimetric structures already used as the transducer for enzymatic microsensors
Detection of pesticides (Dzyadevych et al, 2002)
Enzyme ProteaseCatalyses hydrolysis reaction of proteins:
peptidic links are broken, amino acids are released
increasing of the ionized species in the membrane
increasing of the conductivity of the membrane
Choice of the proteaseProteinase K is chosen
Protease with a serine group
Hydrolyses the proteins of all origins, in few hours
Preferentially peptidic bonding located after hydrophobic amino acids (leucine, for instance)
Immobilisation of the enzymeon the micro-conductimetric
structureA mixture of enzyme & BSA was co-reticulated
with glutaraldehyde
Procedure of immobilisation:1-Preparation of the solution 1: phosphate buffer 1mM, pH 7.5
with 5% of glycerol
2-Enzymatic membrane: 4mg of protease mixed with 6mg of BSA in 100 L of solution 1.
3-Deposition on the surface of the micro-conductimetric structure
4-The structure is put in a saturated atmosphere of glutaraldehyde during an optimized time.
5-The sensor is then dried in air during at least 30 minutes.
Interdigited electrode
digit width 10 µm
Platinum deposit on glass substrate
interdigitated distance 10 µm
digit length 90
µm