original research article doi: 10.26479/2019.0503.20 ... · polyunsaturated fatty acids (pufas),...
TRANSCRIPT
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.244
Original Research Article DOI: 10.26479/2019.0503.20
STUDIES ON FERMENTATIVE LACTIC ACID BACTERIA FOR ENHANCED
GROWTH, ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY ON ZEBRAFISH (DANIO RERIO)
Suja P, Paari K.A.*
Department of Life sciences, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India.
ABSTRACT: This study is aimed to find out the survival, growth, antioxidant capacity and
pigmentation of the Danio rerio supplemented with marine seaweed Gracilaria corticata and
probiotic Pediococcus pentosaceus. The marine seaweeds Gracilaria corticata and probiotic
Pediococcus pentosaceus were fed to the fishes for 30days. Diet without the Gracilaria corticata
supplement and probiotic served as control. The experimental study on parameters of proximate
analysis of feed, gradual growth of fishes, antioxidant activity, and pigmentation on skin of the fish
were measured. Varied antioxidases expression was noted in the treatment groups. Survival rate was
better in the probiotic and Gracilaria corticata supplemented samples compared to the control
samples. Fluorescence chromatophores were identified in fish tail under fluorescent microscopy
using FITC dye. Our research concluded that probiotic and seaweed supplementation enhanced the
activity of antioxidant enzymes and could be used as a potential ingredient in aquaculture feed.
KEYWORDS: Probiotic, seaweed, antioxidant capacity, fluorescence chromatophores
Corresponding Author: Dr. Paari K. A.* Ph.D.
Department of Life sciences, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India.
1. INTRODUCTION
Aquaculture being the innovative part of economy in culturing higher growth of marine organisms
is answering the demands of food production and food security sectors for the growing human
population with enhanced culture methods [1]. Increasing threat from aquaculture diseases and
epizootics to the fisheries community is increasing every year [2]. Lactic acid bacteria commonly
used in household activities are used for its beneficial role in various sectors. Microorganisms
belonging to the batch LAB fabricate various antimicrobial substances that act against different
gram positive and gram negative pathogens. Beneficial properties of probiotic microorganism are
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.245
extended to different host ranging from mice to humans [3]. Immunomodulatory effects of probiotic
strains have been conferred in host organism when supplemented through oral administration [4].
Mode of action of the supplemented probiotic strain might be due to the secretion of excretory
products such as exopolysaccharides, bacteriocins, lactic acid [5]. Most of the organisms belonging
to the group LAB counteract oxidative stress by quenching the expression of free radicals [6].
Identifying a potential novel strains that could control reactive radicals will pave way for
development of novel food supplements which could quench ROS mediated damages in the organ
system [7]. Dietary supplements are effectively converted by the intestinal micro flora by production
of secretory exopolysaccharides which in turn improve the bioavailability of antioxidants [8].
Research is focused towards enhancing the activity of microbiota by supplementing prebiotic
supplements. Supplementation of fermentative lactic acid bacteria along with sea weeds directly
influences the viability of gut microbiota which might have positive influence on the host
metabolism [9]. The ability of the seaweed to enhance the gut microbiome community provides the
microenvironment for the growth of beneficial probiotic bacteria. Red algae Gracilaria which are
found naturally beside the sea coasts was refined and exploited for their biological applications in
food, fodder and therapeutics industries [10]. Bioactive compounds from unexploited seaweeds have
emerged as an attractive element to feed industry. Asian countries particularly Japan, China, and
Korea, have an extensive belief of seaweed utilization while western countries are chiefly involved
in phycocolloids construction such as alginate, agar, and carrageenan from seaweeds[11]. High
quality components of seaweeds which have rich sources of protein, polyphenols, carbohydrates,
polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), amino acids, antioxidants, minerals, dietary fibers, and
vitamins make it highly demanding element in feed industries [12] Using seaweed supplements
along with fermenting lactic acid bacteria will aid in immune enhancement through up regulation of
antioxidant enzymes. Though various methods such as solvent extraction and chemical digestion
are practiced to extract compounds from seaweeds, product recovery and production cost is
controlling its application in feed industries [14]. Fermentation and breakdown of complex
substances in the seaweed in to simpler available forms are carried out by fermentative bacteria.
Hydrolysis of seaweed supplements by fermentative lactic acid bacteria enhance antioxidant activity
which can serve the purpose of growth and metabolism enhancement in aquaculture sector. With a
recent huge unease for the usage of antibiotics and the threat of developing antibiotic resistance
among aquaculture pathogens force researchers to identify alternatives for aquaculture sectors. Use
of fermentative bacteria for livestock boost up the growth as well as survival without causing any
side effects [15]. Though vast amount of studies have reported the usage of lactic acid bacteria and
their secretory products for aquatic health, very limited information are available on the role of
utilization of fermentative product of red algae and its effect on the antioxidant enzymes. Feed
formulations and its effects on the metabolism of antioxidant enzymes can be analyzed in animal
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.246
models which mimic systems close to human system. Basically this effort was carried to know the
outcome of fermentative lactic acid bacteria on hydrolysis of red algae Gracilaria and its role on the
expression of antioxidant enzymes, growth performance using zebrafish as a model system.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Collection and preparation of the plant material
The seaweed Gracilariacorticata was collected from the coastal areas of Mandapam (9°16'58.8"N
79°07'01.2"E), India. The collected samples were thoroughly washed with fresh water several times,
dried at 40°C for 48 to 72 hrs and then ground to powder using a pulverizer. To acquire methanolic
extract, 30g of the powdered plant material and 100 ml of the methanol was loaded in soxhlet. The
extracts were evaporated to total dryness by vacuum distillation. To make sure maximum extraction
was carried out, the process was repeated twice. The solvent was then evaporated under reduced
pressure using a rotary evaporator to obtain extracts and preserved in refrigerator at 4°C for further
analysis.
DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity
The capability to quench the stable free radical DPPH was recorded according to the procedure of
Blois [16]. Methanolic extracts from the seaweed Gracilaria corticata of 0.1ml were mixed with
0.9ml of 0.041 mM DPPH radicals dissolved in methanol. The mixture was shaken robustly and
was incubated for 60min in the dark. The reduction of the DPPH radical was determined by
measuring the absorption at 517nm.Methanol served as blank. AS is the absorbance of the solution
when the sample extract is been added and ADPPH is the absorbance of the DPPH solution.
% RSA = 𝐴𝐷𝑃𝑃𝐻−𝐴𝑆
𝐴𝐷𝑃𝑃𝐻× 100
Reducing Power
The reducing power of Gracilaria corticata extracts was determined [17]. Briefly, Methanolic
extract of Gracilaria corticata (1 ml) was mixed with 1 ml of 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and
1 ml of potassium ferricyanide (10 mg/ml) and was incubated at 55 °C for 25 min. Following
incubation, 1 ml of TCA (trichloroacetic acid- 100 mg/ml) was added, and the mixture was
centrifuged at 14000rpm for 4 min. The upper layer (1.0 ml) was separated and to this 1 ml of
deionised water and 0.1 ml of ferric chloride (1.0 mg/ml) was added. Absorbance was measured at
700 nm. Higher the absorbance designates stronger reducing power.
Analysis of Fluorescent Chromatophores
Experimental fishes were identified for the biochrome pigments on their body following the protocol
of Matthias F. Wucherer [18]. Experimental fishes were dissected after exposure to Gracilaria
corticata extracts. Fins or tails were immersed in the physiological saline for an hour and was stained
using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)dye. Stained sample was air dried at room temperature and
was focused using fluorescence microscopy. Wavelengths of excitation was recorded at 490nm and
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.247
the emissions was measured at 525nm.
Rearing conditions and Experimental design
The treatment slots in our research were categorized into four batches (1) fish supplemented with
diet containing 6LogCFU of Pediococcus pentosaceus, (2) fish fed a diet supplemented with 5%
Gracilaria corticata (3). Fishsupplemented with Pediococcus pentosaceus (6LogCFU)and
Gracilaria corticata (5%) (4) Control group was fed with diet devoid of Pediococcus pentosaceus
and Gracilaria corticata. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) of same weights were purchased from the
aquafarm, Bangalore, India and was maintained in in-house aquaria with proper freshwater
maintenance at 28◦C for a period of 30 days. All aquaria were given proper aeration and water was
circulated and changed daily in a routine basis. Four batches consisting of 10 individuals per batch
were grouped as Control, probiotic minus Gracilaria corticata, probiotics with Gracilaria corticata,
and only Gracilaria corticata
Feed formulation
Feed was prepared using the raw materials such as fishmeal (150gm/kg), wheat flour (140gm/kg),
soya flour (160gm/kg), corn flour (140gm/kg), tapioca flour (180gm/kg), groundnut oil cake
(180gm/kg). The formulations were mixed with 5% of Gracilaria corticata. Prepared ingredients
were collected, shade dried, powered and was sieved by 0.5mm extruder. Distilled water was used
to make dough with feed ingredients. The extruded feed was air dried for 24 hours to prevent the
degradation of vitamin, mineral mix and marine seaweeds. The feed was then trampled, sieved to
get a pellet size ranging 0.2– 0.5 mm, and kept at −20°C to evade oxidation of the marine seaweed.
Proximate composition analysis in feed
Protein content was estimated by the procedure of Lowry [18] by means of Bovine Serum Albumin
(BSA) as standard. Carbohydrate content was established according to the procedure of Dubois [19]
using D-Glucose as standard. Lipid content was estimated following the procedure of Folch[20].
Moisture content in fish was calculated by the method of Rajendran [21]. The ash content was
determined based on the methods mentioned in AOAC [22]
Determination of nutritional effects and survival:
At every 5 days of interval, fishes were taken for wet weight measurement. Indicators of growth
such as feed conversion ratio (FCR), feed efficiency (FE), specific growth rate (SGR), weight gain
(WG) and length gain (LG) percentage were calculated as follows;
Feed Conversion Ratio
Dry feed intake (g)
FCR (g) =
Wet body weight gain (g)
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.248
Feed Efficiency
Wet weight gain (g)
FE (g) =
Dry feed consumed (g)
Percentage Of Survival
Final no. of fish
P(S) = x 100
Initial no. of fish
Specific Growth Rate
Wf – Wi
SGR = x 100
T
Wf = Final average weight of fish
Wi = Initial average weight of fish
T = Duration of feeding trials in days
Weight Gain Percentage
Final weight- Initial weight
WG (%) = × 100
Initial weight
Length Gain Percentage
Final length - Initial length
LG (%) = ×100
Initial length
Antioxidant enzyme activity
Superoxide Dismutase Activity (SOD)
Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) activity was determined based on the capacity of the enzyme to slow
down the autoxidation of pyrogallol [23]. 100µl of sample was added in the clean glass tube. To this,
0.15ml of chloroform was added and mixed well for 15min. After centrifugation, at 13000rpm for
15mins, 2ml of Tris- EDTA buffer and 0.5ml of pyrogallol was added to the supernatant and the
absorbance was read at 470nm against blank. 0.5ml of pyrogallol and 3.5ml of distilled water was
used as blank.
Catalase Activity (CAT)
The CAT activity assay was performed using spectropohotometric determination of hydrogen
peroxide (H2 O2) which form stable complex with ammonium molybdate that absorbs at 405nm [24].
50µl of sample and 1ml of H2O2 were added into the clean glass tube. It was incubated at 37°C for
60 seconds. Following incubation, 1 ml of ammonium molybdate was added and the absorbance
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.249
was read at 405 nm against blank. 1050µl of phosphate buffer and 1000µl of ammonium molybdate
served as blank.
Reduced Glutathione (GSH)
Reduced glutathione (GSH) was calculated according to the method of Beutler [25], using Elmann’s
reagent (DTNB). 50µl of sample was taken in 2ml centrifuge tube. Equal volume of 10% TCA was
added and centrifuged at 12000g for 5 mins. 1ml of Na2 HPO4 and 0.5ml of DTNB was added and
the absorbance was read at 412nm.
Glutathione Peroxide (GPx)
Glutathione Peroxidase activity assay was performed by using spectropohotometric determination
of hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2) [11]. 50 µl of sample was taken in 2 ml centrifuge tube. For blank,
3ml of distilled water was added with 1ml of DTNB. 0.2ml of EDTA and 0.1ml of sodium azide,
0.1ml H2O2, 0.2 ml of Reduced Glutathione and 0.4 ml of phosphate buffer was added and incubated
at 37° C for 10 mins. To this mixture, 20 µl of 10% TCA was added and was centrifuged at 5000
rpm for 5 mins. l ml of Na2 HPO4 and 0.5ml of DTNB was added and the absorbance was read at
412nm.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Proximate Composition Analysis In Feed
The formulated feed containing Gracilaria corticata had about 21.45% of protein, 19.88% of
carbohydrate, 13% of lipid content, 35.89% of moisture content and 2.1% of ash content. Almost
similar nutritional composition was obtained in Gracilaria eduli collected from the same sample
point [26]. Minor changes in the proximate composition value might be due to the seasonal changes
and different regions of sample collection. Variation in the composition is attributed due to the
capacity of the seaweeds to hold minerals, nutrient availability, and geographical location [27].
Higher level of protein, lipid and carbohydrate suggest that the sea weed Gracilaria corticata can
be a potential raw material for designing efficient functional feeds.
Antioxidant property of Gracilaria corticata
The absorbance percentage of Gracilaria corticata extract raised slowly from 0.1 – 0.5 µg/ml in the
DPPH radical scavenging assay (Fig.1). Proton radical scavenging potential was gradually getting
higher at increasing concentration of the Gracilaria corticata extract. Thus the reduction ability of
the DPPH radical is determined by the decrease in its absorbance at 517 nm induced by
antioxidants[28].The reducing power of Gracilaria corticata extract was gradually increasing from
1 – 2 mg/ml (Fig. 2). The high reducing power of compound indicates the ability of the compound
as potential electron donors to quench free radicals competently. Increase in reducing power was
evident with the higher concentration of sea weed extracts. Increasing concentration of the
Gracilaria corticata extract are generally related with the occurrence of reductones which breaks
down the free radical chain by donating a hydrogen atom.
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.250
Fig.1. Dose dependent potential of DPPH radical quenching ability of Gracilariacorticataextracts
Fig.2. Dose dependent potential of reducing ability of Gracilariacorticataextracts
The experimental fish pigments on the tail region focused under light microscopy showed
enhancement of color pigments (Fig.3). The black pigment spot, blue pigment spot, yellow pigment
spot indicates the excitation of melanophores, iridophores and xanthophores respectively.
Chromatophore in fishes actively regulates the circulation of fluorescent pigments throughout the
skin [29]. The fluorescence could act as a context-dependent signal in some marine fish and
ornamental species. Such pigment excitation was not observed in any of the control and Pediococcus
supplemented samples (Data not shown).
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
DP
PH
act
ivit
y
(%)
Extract concentration (µg/ml)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Red
uci
ng p
ow
er a
ctiv
ity
(%
)
Extract concentration (mg/ml)
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.251
Fig.3. Effect of Gracilaria corticata on the expression of chromatophores (X- xanthophores,
M- melanpohores, IR- iridophore) on tail
Growth parameters
Comparing the FCR value from day 1 to day 30 showed Pediococcus pentosaceus treated samples
exhibiting a gradual sloppy range from 3.34 ±0.01 to 2.24 ±0.02. Batches of Gracilaria corticata
plus Pediococcus pentosaceus and Gracilaria corticata also showed reduced FCR value compared
to control samples(Fig.4). Milinković Tur S [30] analysed FCR values on fingerlings of Indian major
carp close from the reported value in this study with a range from 2.68 ± 0.05 to 1.57 ± 0.09.
Significant reduction was noted in all the groups with the growth of zebrafish. This mathematical
calculation provides information regards to amount of feed converted to weight of the fish. With
the increase in the treatment time, decline of FCR value was noted, indicating a better weight gain
in the fish samples. Pediococcus pentosaceus treated sampleshaving less FCR value is due to the
better nutrient absorbtion by the gut microbiota. Gain in body weight due to probiotic
supplementation has been reported in broilers [31]. Significant differences were noted in the feed
conversion among the treatment groups compared to control samples which could be attributed due
to the presence of probiotics Pediococcus pentosaceus and prebiotic Gracilaria corticata causing
improved digestion and nutrient absorption in zebrafish.
X M
I
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.252
Fig.4. Feed Conversion Ratio in the control and in the formulated diet supplemented groups
Feed efficiency designates the correlation between the intake of feed and the body weight gain
[32].Feed efficiency is better in the slots treated with formulated diet compared to control slot(Fig.5).
Though during initial days of treatment, significant differences were not noted, with the progression
of the treatment time, Pediococcus pentosaceus treated batchshowed a gradual raise of feed
efficiency ratio from 0.33 ±0.01g to 0.52 ±0.01g. Gracilaria corticata supplemented
groupsexhibited a range from0.32 ±0.01g to 0.49 ±0.02g, Control groups was in the range between
0.315 ±0.015g and 0.46 ±0.01g. Batch treated with combination of probioticPediococcus
pentosaceus and Gracilaria corticata exhibited a feed efficiency range from 0.31 ±0.01g to 0.45
±0.02g. Complementary activity of both Pediococcus pentosaceus and Gracilaria corticata was
visualizedduring the growth of zebrafish.
Fig.5. Feed Efficiency Ratio in the control and in the formulated diet supplemented groups
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
DAYS 5 10 15 20 25 30
Fee
d c
on
ver
sio
n r
ati
o (
g)
Pediococcus pentosaceus
Control
Pediococcus pentosaceus with Gracilaria corticata
Gracilaria corticata
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
DAYS 5 10 15 20 25 30
Fee
d e
ffec
iency
(g)
Control
Pediococcus pentosaceus
Gracilaria corticata
Pediococcus pentosaceus with Gracilaria corticata
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.253
Results of SGR also supported the influence of fermentative bacteria on the growth rate of zebrafish.
Pediococcus pentosaceus had a boost up in steady growth to0.47 ±0.01, followed by Gracilaria
corticatasupplemented trial(0.44 ±0.01)(Fig.6).
Fig.6. Effect of formulated diet on the Specific Growth Rate
Pediococcus pentosaceus with Gracilaria corticata also exhibited values close to Gracilaria
corticata supplemented group (0 - 0.44 ±0.01).Lowest value was observed in the control slots (0 -
0.31 ±0.01). Results of SGR was in correlation with the results of weight gain and length gain of
the treatment groups. Pediococcus pentosaceus supplemented diet showed enhanced weight and
length gain of about 26.67 ±0.01 and 4.142 ±0.01 respectively at the end of the study period(Fig.7
and Fig.8). Although presence of Gracilaria corticata does not influence the length of the fish,
control had the least weight and length gain compared to other treatment groups.
Fig.7. Effect of formulated diet on the Percentage weight gain in the control and treatment groups
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
DAYS 5 10 15 20 25 30
Sp
ecif
ic gro
wth
rate
( %
)
Control
Pediococcus pentosaceus
Gracilaria corticata
Pediococcus pentosaceus with Gracilaria corticata
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
DAYS 5 10 15 20 25 30
Weig
ht
ga
in p
erc
en
tage (
%)
Gracilaria corticata
Pediococcus pentosaceus with Gracilaria corticata
Pediococcus pentosaceus
Control
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.254
Fig.8. Effect of formulated diet on the length gain in the control and treatment groups
The survival rate was high in Pediococcus pentosaceus supplied batch compared to other samples
(Fig.9). Results of survival rate symbolize the immunity conferred to zebrafish due to the influence
of Pediococcus pentosaceus. Probiotic organismscould have colonized through the outer layer of
the fish and in addition they might secrete products such as exopolysaccharides, lactic acid,
bacteriocin like substances that prevent colonization of pathogenic bacterium [33]
Fig.9. Survival rate in the control and in the formulated diet supplemented groups
Antioxidant profile of zebrafish treated withGracilaria corticataandPediococcus pentosaceus
Expressions of antioxidant enzymes are synergistically controlled by the nutrition and the balance
of pro-oxidant and antioxidants factors. Oxidative stress causes damage to host due to the reduced
expression of antioxidant enzymes [30]. Expression of antioxidant enzymes is directly proportional
0
1
2
3
4
5
DAYS 5 10 15 20 25 30
Len
gth
gain
per
cen
tage
( %
)
CONTROL
Pediococcus pentosaceus
Gracilaria corticata
Pediococcus pentosaceus with Gracilaria corticata
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
DAYS 5 10 15 20 25 30
Per
cen
tage
of
surv
ival
( %
)
Control
Pediococcus pentosaceus
Gracilaria corticata
Pediococcus pentosaceus with Gracilaria corticata
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.255
to the antioxidant content in the feed [11] stated that SOD dismutates superoxide anion to H2O2.
Pediococcus pentosaceus and Gracilaria corticata simultaneously possessed equal capacity for
SOD activity in the fish samples. Wu [28] reported increased SOD activity in brown algae
supplemented samples. With time, CAT activity deceased gradually, but remained higher than that
of the control category. Takano [36] stated that the increase in CAT activity in muscle suggests
higher level of oxidative stress possibly due to the ROS-derived lophocladine detoxification.
Catalase is the most vital enzyme in detoxifying H2O2. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) catalyzes the
reduction hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxides and is denoted as a competent defending enzyme
against lipid peroxidation [46]. GPx exists in muscle and involves in the response of removal of
H2O2 and is documented as one of the most significant antioxidant that barricades against oxygen
toxicity in organisms [43]. Wu [28] confirmed that GSH plays an innermost role in the detoxification
of ROS, which can be generated as by-products throughout the biotransformation of a mixture of
endogenous and exogenous substances. The GSH and GPx antioxidant activity is significantly high
in Pediococcus pentosaceusalone than the other samples such as Gracilaria corticata, Pediococcus
pentosaceus with Gracilaria corticata and control treated fishes. Gracilaria has been reported for
its antioxidant nature both in vitro and in vivo[37].Effective antioxidant activity in the sea weed
treated group could be due the presence of phenolic compounds and polysaccharides. Differential
expression of antioxidant enzymes among the treatment groups is due to the difference in the
antioxidant nutrients in the feeds [38]. Similar trend in enzyme activity was not noted among the
treatment groups as antioxidant enzymes react synergistically with each other which has an impact
on radical quenching [39]. Differential expression of the antioxidant activity is attributed to the age,
susceptibility to environmental stress and pathogenic stress [11]. Though the ability to restrict the
oxidation by probiotic organism is not clearly understood, symptoms of probiotics elevating the
antitoxidases activity in the host is reported [32]. Cultures of lactic acid bacteria comprising the
intestinal microbiota have exerted radical quenching property [40]. Better antioxidant enzyme
system were recorded in probiotics species which are capable to deliver antioxidases such as
catalases [41], SOD [43], GSH [29]. Supplementation of probiotics have been reported for
augmentation of antioxidant metabolites [15].
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.256
Fig.10.Effect of formulated diet on the expression of antioxidant enzymes in the
control and treatment groups
4. CONCLUSION
This study has demonstrated that probiotic Pediococcus pentosaceus has a momentous influence on
the survival rate, feed conversion ratio as well as on the final mean weight of the zebrafish.
Fermentative bacteria plays a crucial role in the breakdown of metabolites and increases the
bioavailability of the nutrients which is a crucial factor for aquaculture feed designing. Bioactive
compounds from this less studied seaweeds have emerged as an appealing attribute in designing
functional feeds.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors wish to acknowledge Fr.Jobi for his support in providing infrastructure facilities to
perform experiments.
CONFLICT OF INTERST
Authors have no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Ravi AV, Musthafa KS, Jegathammbal G, Kathiresan K, Pandian SK. Screening and evaluation
of probiotics as a biocontrol agent against pathogenic Vibrios in marine aquaculture. Lett Appl
Microbiol. 2007; 45:219-223.
2. Vine NG, Leukes WD, Kaiser H,Daya S, Baxter J, Hecht T. Competition for attachment of
aquaculture candidate probiotic and pathogenic bacteria on fish intestinal mucus. J Fish Dis .
2004; 27:319-326.
3. Foulquie MMR, Sarantinopoulos P, Tsakalidou E, DeVuyst L.The role and application of
enterococci in food and health. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006; 106:1-24.
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
CONTROL PROBIOTIC SEAWEED PROBIOTIC
AND
SEAWEED
AN
TIO
XID
AN
T E
NZ
YM
E A
CT
IVIT
Y (
%)
SAMPLE
SOD
CAT
GSH
GPx
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.257
4. Sun P, Wang J, Jiang Y. Effect of Enterococcus faecium (SF68) on immune function in mice.
Food Chem. 2010; 123:63-68.
5. Paari A, Hari Krishnam Naidu, Kanmani P, Satishkumar R,Yuvaraj N,Pattukumar V, Arul V.
Evaluation of Irradiation and Heat Treatmenton Antioxidant Properties of Fruit Peel Extractsand
Its Potential Application During Preservation of Goat Fish Parupenaeus indicus. Food
Bioprocess Technol. 2012; 5:152-168.
6. Spyropoulos BG, Misiakos EP, Fotiadis C, Stoidis CN. Antioxidant properties of probiotics and
their protective effects in the pathogenesis of radiation-induced enteritis and colitis. Dig Dis Sci.
2011; 56:285-294.
7. Zanoni S, Pompei A, Cordisco L, Amaretti A, Rossi M, Matteuzzi D. Growth kinetics on oligo-
and polysaccharides and promising features of three antioxidative potential probiotic strains. J
Appl Microbiol. 2008; 105:1266-1276.
8. Amaretti A, Nunzio M,Pompei A, Raimondi S, Rossi M, Bordoni A.Antioxidant properties of
potentially probiotic bacteria: In vitro and in vivo activities. Appl Microbial Biotechnol. 2012;
97:809-817.
9. De LeBlanc AM, LeBlanc JG, Perdigon G, Miyoshi A, Langella P, Azevedo V, Sesma F. Oral
administration of a catalase-producing Lactococcus lactis can prevent a chemically induced
colon cancer in mice. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:100-105.
10. Sowmya R, Sachindra NM, Hosokawa M ,Miyashita K. Antioxidative properties of seaweed
components. In Seaweeds: Ecology, Nutrition and Health Benefits ed. Pomin, V.H. 2011; 137-
162.
11. Aluwong T, Kawu M, Raji M, Dzenda T, Govwang F, Sinkalu V, Ayo J. Effect of yeast probiotic
on growth, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde concentration of broiler
chickens. Antioxidants. 2013; 2:326-339.
12. Chandini SK, Ganesan P, Suresh PV, Bhaskar N. Seaweeds as a source of nutritionally
beneficial compounds -A review. J Food Sci Technol. 2008; 45:1-13.
13. Heo SJ, Lee KW, Song CB, Jeon YJ. Antioxidant activity of enzymatic extracts from brown
seaweeds. Algae. 2003; 18:71-81.
14. Ejtahed HS, Mohtadi Nia J, Homayouni Rad A, Niafar M, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Mofid V.
Probiotic yogurt improves antioxidant status in type 2 diabetic patients. Nutrition. 2012;28:539-
543.
15. Blois MS. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature. 1958; 181:
1199-1200.
16. Oyaizu M. Studies on products of browning reactions: antioxidative activities of products of
browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Jpn J Nut. 1986; 44: 307-315.
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.258
17. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin phenol
reagent. J Biol Chem.1951; 193:265-275.
18. Dubois M, Gilles A, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith FD. Colorimetric method for determination
of sugars and related substances. Anal chem. 1956; 28: 350-356.
19. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane StanleyGH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total
lipids from animal. J Biol Chem. 1957; 226:497-509.
20. Rajendran M. Copepoda in: A guide to the study of freshwater organisms. J Madurai Univ.
1973; 1:103-151.
21. AOAC.Official methods of analysis 16th Ed. Association of official analytical chemists.
Washington DC, USA. 1995.
22. Marklund S, Marklund G. Involvement of the Superoxide Anion Radical in the Autoxidation of
Pyrogallol and a Convenient Assay for Superoxide Dismutase. Eur J Biochem. 1974; 47: 469-
474.
23. Goth L. A simple method for determination of serum catalase activity and revision of
reference range. Clinics Chimica Acta. 1991; 196:143-152.
24. Beutler E , Duron O, Kelly BM. Improved method for determination of blood glutathione. J Lab
Clin Med. 1963; 61:882-888.
25. Debbarma J, Rao BM, Murthy LN,Mathew S, Venkateshwarlu G, Ravishankar CN. Nutritional
profiling of the edible seaweeds Gracilaria edulis, Ulva lactuca and Sargassum sp. Indian J
Fish.2016; 63:81-87.
26. Wong K H, Cheung PCK. Nutritional evaluation of some subtropical red and green seaweeds.
Part I-proximate composition, amino acid profiles and some physic - chemical properties. Food
Chem. 2000; 71:475-482.
27. Wu M, Wu Y, Qu M, Li W, Yan X. Evaluation of antioxidant activities of water-soluble
polysaccharides from brown alga Hizikia fusiformis. Int J Bio Macro.2013;56:28-33.
28. Wucherer MF, Michiels NK. A Fluorescent Chromatophore Changes the Level of Fluorescence
in a Reef Fish. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e37913.
29. Milinković Tur S, Stojević Z, Pirsljin J, Zdelar Tuk M, Poljicak Milas N, Ljubić BB, Gradinski-
Vrbanac B. Effects of fasting and refeeding on the antioxidant system in cockerels and pullets.
Acta Veterinaria Hungarica.2007; 55:181-189.
30. Bansal GR, Singh VP, Sachan N. Effect of probiotic supplementation on the performance of
broilers. Asian J Anim Sci. 2011; 5:277-284.
31. Wang Y, Wu Y, Wang Y, Xu H, Mei X, Yu D, Wang Y, Li W. Antioxidant Properties of Probiotic
Bacteria. Nutrients. 2017; 19:521-536.
32. Sayes C, Leyton Y, Riquelme C. Probiotic Bacteria as an Healthy Alternative for Fish
Aquaculture, Antibiotic Use in Animals, Sara Savic, Intech Open. 2017;116-127.
Suja & Paari RJLBPCS 2019 www.rjlbpcs.com Life Science Informatics Publications
© 2019 Life Science Informatics Publication All rights reserved
Peer review under responsibility of Life Science Informatics Publications
2019 May – June RJLBPCS 5(3) Page No.259
33. Wu M, Wu Y, Qu M, Li W, X. Yan. Evaluation of antioxidant activities of water-soluble
polysaccharides from brown alga Hizikia fusiformis. Int J Biol Macro.2013;56:28-33.
34. Vidhyasagar V, Jeevaratnam, K. Evaluation of Pediococcus pentosaceus strains isolated from
Idly batter for probiotic properties in vitro. J Functional Foods. 2013; 5:235-243.
35. Fidelis G, Camara R, Queiroz M. Proteolysis, NaOH and ultrasound-enhanced extraction of
anticoagulant and antioxidant sulfated polysaccharides from the edible seaweed, Gracilaria
birdiae. Molecules. 2014; 19:18511-8526.
36. Cowey CB. The role of nutritional factors in the prevention of peroxidative damage to
tissues. Fish Physiol Biochem. 1986;2:171-178.
37. Marineli RDS, Alves Lenquiste S, Aguiar Moraes, Maróstica MR. Antioxidant potential of
dietary chia seed and oil (Salvia hispanica L.) in diet-induced obese rats. Food Res. Int .2015;
76:666-674.
38. Yang HL, Xia HQ, Ye YD, Zou WC, Sun YZ. Probiotic Bacillus pumilus SE5 shapes the
intestinal microbiota and mucosal immunity in grouper Epinephelus coioides. Dis Aquat
Org. 2014; 111: 119-127.
39. Rajput IR, Li LY, Xin X, Wu BB, Juan ZL, Cui ZW, Yu DY, Li WF. Effect of Saccharomyces
boulardii and Bacillus subtilis B10 on intestinal ultrastructure modulation and mucosal
immunity development mechanism in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2013; 92: 956-965.
40. Kullisaar T, Zilmer M, Mikelsaar M, Vihalemm T, Annuk H, Kairane C, Kilk A. Two
antioxidative lactobacilli strains as promising probiotics. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002;72:215-224.
41. Pompei A, Cordisco L, Amaretti A, Zanoni S, Matteuzzi D, Rossi M. Folate production
by bifidobacteria as a potential probiotic property. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:179-185.
42. Spyropoulos BG, Misiakos EP, Fotiadis C, Stoidis CN. Antioxidant properties of probiotics and
their protective effects in the pathogenesis of radiation-induced enteritis and colitis. Dig Dis Sci.
2011; 56: 285-294.
43. Azcárate Peril MA, Sikes M, Bruno-Bárcena JM. The intestinal microbiota, gastrointestinal
environment and colorectal cancer: a putative role for probiotics in prevention of colorectal
cancer. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011; 301:401-424.
44. Zanoni S, Pompei A, Cordisco L, Amaretti A, Rossi M, Matteuzzi D. Growth kinetics on oligo-
and polysaccharides and promising features of three antioxidative potential probiotic strains. J
Appl Microbiol. 2008; 105:1266-1276.
45. Heo SJ, Lee KW, Song CB, Jeon YJ. Antioxidant activity of enzymatic extracts from brown
seaweeds. Algae. 2003; 18:71-81.
46. Aluwong T, Kawu M, Raji M, Dzenda T, Govwang F, Sinkalu V,Ayo J. Effect of Yeast Probiotic
on Growth, Antioxidant Enzyme Activities and Malondialdehyde Concentration of Broiler
Chickens. Antioxidants.2013;2:326-339.