output portfolio8

7/23/2019 OUTPUT Portfolio8

1/38

STUDENT PORTFOLIO IN STATISTICSPORTFOLIO 8 MEASURES OF DIFFERENCES

TRADITIONAL NOTE-TAKING andDIGITAL NOTE-TAKING between and among the means of the following groups:

A. Using t Test

A.1. Gender

A.2. Religion

B. Using One!a" A#O$A with %ollowup &'heffe or Tu(e" Test

B.1. )ollege

B.2. Age

PASW RESULTS:

T-Test (Traditional Note-Taking)

Group Statistics

Gender N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Traditional Note-Taking 1Male 12 3.42 .793 .229

Female 28 3.8 .12 .11

Traditional Note-Taking 2Male 12 3.2! .22 .179

Female 28 3.4 .37 .12"

Traditional Note-Taking 3 Male 12 3.33 .492 .142

A.1. There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the traditional noteta(ing s'ale between males and females. *+ o,-

A.2. There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the digital noteta(ing s'ale between males and females. *+ o-


2/38

Female 28 3.71 .!3! .1"1

Traditional Note-Taking 4Male 12 3.!" .9"! .21

Female 28 3.8 .!48 .1"4

Traditional Note-Taking !Male 12 3.17 .83! .241

Female 28 3.!4 .37 .12"

Traditional Note-Taking Male 12 3.42 .9 .193

Female 28 3.!7 .34 .12"

Traditional Note-Taking 7Male 12 3.42 .9 .193

Female 28 3.!4 .!7 .1"9

Traditional Note-Taking #ve.Male 12 3.3!7! .!!243 .1!947

Female 28 3.!97! .49""2 ."92"

Independent Samples Test

$evene%& Te&t 'orE()alit* o' +arian,e&

t-te&t 'or E()alit* o' Mean&

F Sig. t d' Sig. 2-tailedMean

Di''eren,e&Std. Error

Di''eren,e&

9!/ 0on'iden,e ntervalo' te Di''eren,e

$oer 55er

Traditional Note-Taking 1

E()al varian,e&a&&)med

2.!3! ".12 -1.134 38 ".24 -".22 ".231 -".729 ".2"

E()al varian,e&not a&&)med

-1."21 1.882 ".322 -".22 ".2! -".8"3 ".279


E()al varian,e&

a&&)med".!84 ".449 -".982 38 ".333 -".214 ".218 -".! ".228


-".992 21.37! ".332 -".214 ".21 -".3 ".23!



"."28 ".88 -2.112 38 "."41 -".381 ".18 -".74 -"."1


-2.18! 22.!72 "."4 -".381 ".174 -".742 -"."2


3/38



2.341 ".134 -".771 38 ".44! -".179 ".232 -".47 ".29


-".3 14.!8! ".!3! -".179 ".281 -".779 ".422

Traditional Note-Taking !


".""4 ".9!3 -1.!28 38 ".13! -".39 ".242 -".8!8 ".12


-1.37 1.7!4 ".189 -".39 ".29 -".938 ".2

Traditional Note-Taking


".1"! ".748 -".9 38 ".491 -".1!! ".222 -"."! ".29!


-".81 19.912 ".!"4 -".1!! ".227 -".29 ".319



".43 ".! -".!71 38 ".!71 -".119 ".2"9 -".!41 ".3"3


-".!37 18.3 ".!98 -".119 ".222 -".!84 ".34


#verage


".""1 ".974 -1.37 38 ".18 -".24 ".17!!8 -".!9!44 ".11!44


-1.3"1 18.798 ".2"9 -".24 ".18441 -".22 ".142

DATA PRESENTATION:

Differences on the Traditional Note-Taking Scale between Male and emale !espondents

Traditional #oteTa(ing &'ale Gender /ean&tandard0eiation

t $alue &ig0e'ision on

+onterpretation

feel good about ta(ing notes on a paper3 noteboo(./ale ,.2 4.56,

1.1, 4.27 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale ,.78 4.712 am able to ta(e notes faster b" writing on a paper3 noteboo(.

/ale ,.29 4.7224.682 4.,,, A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale ,.7 4.7,5

'an understand the 'on'ept when ta(e notes on a paper3 noteboo(./ale ,.,, 4.62

2.112 4.41 Ree'ted &ignifi'ant%emale ,.51 4.9,9


4/38

alwa"s get a 'lear idea of what the instru'tor dis'ussed when ta(enotes on a paper3 noteboo(.

/ale ,.9 4.6494.551 4.9 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale ,.78 4.98

learn best when ta(e notes on a paper3 noteboo(.

/ale ,.15 4.8,91.928 4.1,9 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale ,.9 4.7,5

feel hae an effi'ient s"stem when ta(e notes on a paper3noteboo(.

/ale ,.2 4.776 4.767 4.61 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant%emale ,.95 4.7,

On the whole; am able to perform well in m" 'lass when ta(e noteson a paper3 noteboo(.

/ale ,.2 4.7764.951 4.951 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale ,.9 4.957

Composite Mea/ale ,.,959 4.992,

1.,75 4.180 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant%emale ,.9659 4.6442

T-Test (Digital Note-Taking)

Group StatisticsGender N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Digital Note-Taking 1Male 12 2.!8 .!1! .149

Female 28 2.43 .79" .149

Digital Note-Taking 2Male 12 2.83 .718 .2"7

Female 28 2.89 .832 .1!7

Digital Note-Taking 3Male 12 2.83 .83! .241

Female 28 2.!4 .37 .12"

Digital Note-Taking 4Male 12 2.7 .!1 .188

Female 28 2.39 .737 .139

Digital Note-Taking !Male 12 2.7! .8 .2!"

Female 28 2.3 .78 .128

Digital Note-Taking Male 12 2.7 .778 .22!

Female 28 2.!" .38 .121


5/38

Digital Note-Taking 7Male 12 2.7! .7!4 .218

Female 28 2.4 .37 .12"

Digital Note-Taking #verageMale 12 2.72!8 .!9473 .1718

Female 28 2.!1"7 .!!4" .1"!1!






Di''eren,e&


$oer 55er

Digital Note-Taking 1


2.44 ".112 ".22 38 ".!38 ".1!! ".249 -".349 ".!9

E()al varian,e& nota&&)med

".73! 31.383 ".48 ".1!! ".211 -".27! ".!84



"."33 ".8! -".21 38 ".831 -"." ".27 -".19 ".!


-".229 24."!9 ".821 -"." ".2 -".!9 ".477



1.331 ".2! 1.232 38 ".22 ".298 ".242 -".191 ".787


1.1"! 1.7!4 ".28! ".298 ".29 -".271 ".87



".271 "." 1.112 38 ".273 ".274 ".24 -".22! ".772

E()al varian,e& nota&&)med 1.17 23.!11 ".2!4 ".274 ".234 -".21 ".7!7

Digital Note-Taking !


".429 ".!1 1.!43 38 ".131 ".393 ".2!! -".122 ".9"8


1.398 17."7 ".18 ".393 ".281 -".2 ".98!


6/38

Digital Note-Taking


".9"7 ".347 ".7"8 38 ".483 ".17 ".23! -".31 ".43


".!3 17.!4 ".!22 ".17 ".2!! -".37 ".7"3



".29 ".!93 1.23 38 ".22 ".28 ".232 -".184 ".7!


1.149 18."8 ".2 ".28 ".249 -".237 ".8"8

Digital Note-Taking#verage


".337 ".!! 1."98 38 ".279 ".21!12 ".19!9 -".1814! ".119


1."9 19.72 ".298 ".21!12 ".2"132 -".2"!28 ".3!!2

DATA PRESENTATION:

Differences on the Digital Note-Taking Scale between Male and emale !espondents

0igital #oteTa(ing &'ale Gender /ean&tandard0eiation

t $alue &ig 0e'ision on +o nterpretation

feel good about ta(ing notes on a phone3 tablet./ale 2.!8 ".!1!

4.722 4.9,8 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant%emale 2.43 ".79

am able to ta(e notes faster b" ta(ing a pi'ture of the lessons on a phone3tablet.

/ale 2.83 ".7184.217 4.8,1 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale 2.89 ".832

'an understand the 'on'ept when ta(e pi'ture of the lessons on a phone3tablet.

/ale 2.83 ".83!1.2,2 4.227 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale 2.!4 ".37

alwa"s get a 'lear idea of what the instru'tor dis'ussed when ta(e notes on a

phone3 tablet.

/ale 2.7 ".!11.112 4.25, A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale 2.39 ".737

learn best when ta(e notes on a phone3 tablet.

/ale 2.7! ".81.9, 4.1,1 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale 2.3 ".78

feel hae an effi'ient s"stem when ta(e notes on a phone3 tablet.

/ale 2.7 ".7784.548 4.8, A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale 2.! ".38


7/38

On the whole; am able to perform well in m" 'lass when ta(e notes on aphone3 tablet.

/ale 2.7! ".7!41.2, 4.227 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale 2.4 ".37

Composite Mea /ale 2.72!8 ".!9473 1.468 4.256 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

%emale 2.!1"7 ".!!4

FINDINGS: There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the traditional noteta(ing s'ale between males and females .

There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the digital noteta(ing s'ale between males and females.

CONCLUSION: A''ept +o, and +o

INTERPRETATION: The male and female groups hae similar oerall iews on the traditional noteta(ing s'ale.

The male and female groups hae similar oerall iews on the digital noteta(ing s'ale.

A.,. There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the traditional noteta(ing s'ale between Roman )atholi' and #on)atholi'. *+ o9-

A.. There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the digital noteta(ing s'ale between Roman )atholi' and #on)atholi'. *+ o7-


8/38

PASW RESULTS:

T-Test (Traditional Note-Taking)

Group Statistics

6eligion N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Traditional Note-Taking 16oman 0atoli, 28 3.4 .21 .117

Non- 0atoli, 12 3.!" .798 .23"

Traditional Note-Taking 26oman 0atoli, 28 3.4 .!7 .1"9

Non- 0atoli, 12 3.2! .7!4 .218

Traditional Note-Taking 36oman 0atoli, 28 3.4 .488 ."92

Non- 0atoli, 12 3.!" .74 .19!

Traditional Note-Taking 46oman 0atoli, 28 3.71 .4" ."87

Non- 0atoli, 12 3.42 .99 .288

Traditional Note-Taking !6oman 0atoli, 28 3.!4 .!7 .1"9

Non- 0atoli, 12 3.17 .937 .271

Traditional Note-Taking 6oman 0atoli, 28 3.4 .!!9 .1"

Non- 0atoli, 12 3.2! .7!4 .218

Traditional Note-Taking 76oman 0atoli, 28 3.1 .497 ."94

Non- 0atoli, 12 3.2! .7!4 .218Traditional Note-Taking

#verage

6oman 0atoli, 28 3."7! .397!" ."7!12

Non- 0atoli, 12 3.3342 .7"21 .2"283



9/38





Di''eren,e&


$oer 55er



1.2 ".21 ".11 38 ".!4! ".143 ".234 -".33" ".1


".!!3 1.998 ".!88 ".143 ".2!9 -".4"3 ".88



1."22 ".319 ".982 38 ".333 ".214 ".218 -".228 ".!


".881 1.771 ".391 ".214 ".243 -".3"" ".728



3.413 "."72 ".7!! 38 ".4!! ".143 ".189 -".24" ".!2

E()al varian,e&

not a&&)med

".3 1.11 ".!1 ".143 ".21! -".313 ".!99



9.24 ".""4 1.3"4 38 ".2 ".298 ".228 -".14 ".7


".991 13."!8 ".34 ".298 ".3 -".3!1 ".94



1.727 ".197 1.!28 38 ".13! ".39 ".242 -".12" ".8!8


1.2! 14.94 ".22 ".39 ".292 -".2!4 ".992



1.841 ".183 1.832 38 "."7! ".393 ".214 -"."41 ".827

E()al varian,e&

not a&&)med 1.24 1.419 ".123 ".393 ".242 -".119 ".9"!



3.739 "."1 1.77! 38 "."84 ".3!7 ".2"1 -"."!" ".7!


1.!"7 1!.271 ".1!2 ".3!7 ".237 -".147 ".82


10/38

Traditional Note-Taking #verage


1.993 ".1 1.!8 38 ".12! ".27333 ".17429 -"."79! ".217


1.24 14.117 ".227 ".27333 ".2129 -".19"2 ".7387

DATA PRESENTATION:

Differences on the Traditional Note-Taking Scale between !oman "atholic and Non-"atholic !espondents

Traditional #oteTa(ing &'ale 6eligion /ean&tandard0eiation

t $alue &ig0e'ision on

+onterpretation

feel good about ta(ing notes on a paper3 noteboo(.6oman 0atoli, 3.4 ".21

4.711 4.99 A''epted #ot &ignifi'antNon- 0atoli, 3.!" ".798

am able to ta(e notes faster b" writing on a paper3 noteboo(.6oman 0atoli, 3.4 ".!7

4.682 4.,,, A''epted #ot &ignifi'antNon- 0atoli, 3.2! ".7!4

'an understand the 'on'ept when ta(e notes on a paper3 noteboo(.6oman 0atoli, 3.4 ".488

4.599 4.99 A''epted #ot &ignifi'antNon- 0atoli, 3.!" ".74

alwa"s get a 'lear idea of what the instru'tor dis'ussed when ta(e noteson a paper3 noteboo(.

6oman 0atoli, 3.71 ".41.,4 4.244 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

Non- 0atoli, 3.42 ".99

learn best when ta(e notes on a paper3 noteboo(.

6oman 0atoli, 3.!4 ".!7

1.928 4.1,9 A''epted #ot &ignifi'antNon- 0atoli, 3.17 ".937

feel hae an effi'ient s"stem when ta(e notes on a paper3 noteboo(.

6oman 0atoli, 3.4 ".!!9

1.8,2 4.459 A''epted #ot &ignifi'antNon- 0atoli, 3.2! ".7!4

On the whole; am able to perform well in m" 'lass when ta(e notes on apaper3 noteboo(.

6oman 0atoli, 3.1 ".497

1.559 4.48 A''epted #ot &ignifi'antNon- 0atoli, 3.2! ".7!4

Composite Mea 6oman 0atoli, 3."7! ".397! 1.978 4.129 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant


11/38

Non- 0atoli, 3.3342 ".7"21

T-Test (Digital Note-Taking)

Group Statistics

6eligion N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Digital Note-Taking 16oman 0atoli, 28 2.!7 .34 .12"

Non- 0atoli, 12 2.2! .8 .2!"

Digital Note-Taking 26oman 0atoli, 28 3."4 .93 .131

Non- 0atoli, 12 2.!" .9"! .21

Digital Note-Taking 36oman 0atoli, 28 2.71 .!9 .124

Non- 0atoli, 12 2.42 .793 .229

Digital Note-Taking 46oman 0atoli, 28 2.!7 .9" .13"

Non- 0atoli, 12 2.2! .7!4 .218

Digital Note-Taking !6oman 0atoli, 28 2.!4 .93 .131

Non- 0atoli, 12 2.33 .888 .2!

Digital Note-Taking 6oman 0atoli, 28 2.1 .29 .119

Non- 0atoli, 12 2.42 .793 .229

Digital Note-Taking 76oman 0atoli, 28 2.!7 .!73 .1"8

Non- 0atoli, 12 2.!" .9"! .21

Digital Note-Taking #verage6oman 0atoli, 28 2.!8 .!1774 ."9784

Non- 0atoli, 12 2.38"8 .!731 .1897!





12/38



Di''eren,e&


$oer 55er



".71 ".4"3 1.314 38 ".197 ".321 ".24! -".174 ".817


1.1!9 1.28 ".23 ".321 ".277 -".2! ".9"8



2.31 ".113 2."42 38 "."48 ".!3 ".22 ".""! 1."7


1.834 1.79 "."84 ".!3 ".292 -"."81 1.1!3



".!9 ".4!! 1.232 38 ".22 ".298 ".242 -".191 ".787


1.142 17.832 ".28 ".298 ".21 -".2! ".84!



".214 ".4 1.314 38 ".197 ".321 ".24! -".174 ".817


1.27 19.3" ".22 ".321 ".2!4 -".2"9 ".8!2



".837 ".3 ".777 38 ".442 ".2"2 ".2 -".32! ".729


".7"3 17."23 ".491 ".2"2 ".288 -".4"! ".8"9

Digital Note-Taking


".7" ".4" ".811 38 ".422 ".19 ".23! -".28! ".


".739 17.22 ".47 ".19 ".2!8 -".3!3 ".734



4.7 "."3! ".3"2 38 ".74 "."71 ".237 -".4"7 ".!!


".2!3 14.92 ".8"4 "."71 ".283 -".!31 ".74

Digital Note-Taking#verage


".2! "."9 1.433 38 ".1 ".27774 ".19381 -".1141 ".7""9


1.3"1 17.134 ".211 ".27774 ".21349 -".17242 ".7279


13/38

DATA PRESENTATION:

Differences on the Digital Note-Taking Scale between !oman "atholic and Non-"atholic !espondents

0igital #oteTa(ing &'ale 6eligion /ean&tandard0eiation

t $alue &ig 0e'ision on +o nterpretation

feel good about ta(ing notes on a phone3 tablet.6oman 0atoli, 2.!7 ".34

1.,1 4.165 A''epted #ot &ignifi'antNon- 0atoli, 2.2! ".8

am able to ta(e notes faster b" ta(ing a pi'ture of the lessons on a phone3tablet.

6oman 0atoli, 3."4 ".932.42 4.48 Ree'ted &ignifi'ant

Non- 0atoli, 2.! ".9"!

'an understand the 'on'ept when ta(e pi'ture of the lessons on a

phone3 tablet.

6oman 0atoli, 2.71 ".!9

1.2,2 4.227 A''epted #ot &ignifi'antNon- 0atoli, 2.42 ".793

alwa"s get a 'lear idea of what the instru'tor dis'ussed when ta(e noteson a phone3 tablet.

6oman 0atoli, 2.!7 ".91.,1 4.165 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

Non- 0atoli, 2.2! ".7!4

learn best when ta(e notes on a phone3 tablet.

6oman 0atoli, 2.!4 ".934.555 4.2 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

Non- 0atoli, 2.33 ".888

feel hae an effi'ient s"stem when ta(e notes on a phone3 tablet.

6oman 0atoli, 2.1 ".294.811 4.22 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

Non- 0atoli, 2.42 ".793

On the whole; am able to perform well in m" 'lass when ta(e notes on aphone3 tablet.

6oman 0atoli, 2.!7 ".!734.,42 4.57 A''epted #ot &ignifi'ant

Non- 0atoli, 2.! ".9"!

Composite Mea6oman 0atoli, 2.!8 ".!1774

1.,, 4.174 A''epted #ot &ignifi'antNon- 0atoli, 2.38"8 ".!731

FINDINGS: There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the traditional noteta(ing s'ale between Roman )atholi's and #on)atholi's.


14/38

There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the digital noteta(ing s'ale between Roman )atholi's and #on)atholi's.

CONCLUSION: A''ept +o9 and +o7

INTERPRETATION: The Roman )atholi' and #on)atholi' groups hae similar oerall iews on the traditional noteta(ing s'ale.

The Roman )atholi' and #on)atholi' groups hae similar oerall iews on the digital noteta(ing s'ale.

#$S% !&S'TS

*newa+ (Traditional Note-Taking)

B.1. There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the traditional noteta(ing s'ale among the different 'olleges. *+ o1-

B.2. There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the digital noteta(ing s'ale among the different 'olleges. *+ o2-


15/38

Descripti,es

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 9!/ 0on'iden,e nterval 'or Mean Minim)m Maim)m

$oer o)nd 55er o)nd


0#M 24 3.71 .!!" .112 3.48 3.94 2 4

0#S 14 3.43 .8!2 .228 2.94 3.92 2 4

MD0N 2 3.!" .7"7 .!"" -2.8! 9.8! 3 4

Total 4" 3." .72 .1" 3.39 3.81 2 4


0#M 24 3.2! .!32 .1"9 3."3 3.47 2 4

0#S 14 3.4 .74! .199 3.21 4."7 2 4

MD0N 2 3.!" .7"7 .!"" -2.8! 9.8! 3 4

Total 4" 3.4" .32 .1"" 3.2" 3." 2 4


0#M 24 3.!4 .!"9 .1"4 3.33 3.7 3 4

0#S 14 3.71 .11 .13 3.3 4."7 2 4

MD0N 2 3.!" .7"7 .!"" -2.8! 9.8! 3 4

Total 4" 3." .!4! ."8 3.43 3.77 2 4


0#M 24 3.3 .49! .1"1 3.42 3.83 3 4

0#S 14 3.!7 .938 .2!1 3."3 4.11 1 4

MD0N 2 4."" .""" .""" 4."" 4."" 4 4

Total 4" 3.3 .7 .1" 3.41 3.84 1 4


0#M 24 3.!" .!9" .12" 3.2! 3.7! 2 4

0#S 14 3.29 .914 .244 2.7 3.81 1 4

MD0N 2 3.!" .7"7 .!"" -2.8! 9.8! 3 4

Total 4" 3.43 .712 .113 3.2" 3.! 1 4

Traditional Note-Taking 0#M 24 3.3 .!7 .118 3.38 3.87 2 4

0#S 14 3.43 .7! .2"2 2.99 3.87 2 4

MD0N 2 3."" .""" .""" 3."" 3."" 3 3


16/38

Total 4" 3.!3 .4" .1"1 3.32 3.73 2 4


0#M 24 3.!8 .!"4 .1"3 3.37 3.8" 3 4

0#S 14 3.3 .74! .199 2.93 3.79 2 4

MD0N 2 3.!" .7"7 .!"" -2.8! 9.8! 3 4

Total 4" 3.!" .!99 ."9! 3.31 3.9 2 4


#verage

0#M 24 3.!483 .3821 ."781" 3.388 3.7"99 2.!7 4.""

0#S 14 3.49"" .72!23 .19383 3."713 3.9"87 1.8 4.""

MD0N 2 3.!""" .2998 .21""" .8317 .183 3.29 3.71

Total 4" 3.!2!! .!14!1 ."813! 3.31" 3.9"" 1.8 4.""

$N*$

S)m o' S()are& d' Mean S()are F Sig.


eteen Gro)5& .713 2 .3!7 .781 .4!

:itin Gro)5& 1.887 37 .4!

Total 17."" 39


eteen Gro)5& 1.38 2 .93 1.8"4 .179

:itin Gro)5& 14.214 37 .384

Total 1!."" 39


eteen Gro)5& .28! 2 .142 .4! .32

:itin Gro)5& 11.31! 37 .3"

Total 11."" 39


eteen Gro)5& .321 2 .11 .349 .7"8

:itin Gro)5& 17."!4 37 .41

Total 17.37! 39

Traditional Note-Taking ! eteen Gro)5& .418 2 .2"9 .399 .74

:itin Gro)5& 19.3!7 37 .!23


17/38

Total 19.77! 39


eteen Gro)5& .921 2 .41 1.132 .333

:itin Gro)5& 1!."!4 37 .4"7

Total 1!.97! 39

Traditional Note-Taking 7eteen Gro)5& .4!2 2 .22 .18 .!4!:itin Gro)5& 13.!48 37 .3

Total 14.""" 39


#verage

eteen Gro)5& ."31 2 ."1 ."!7 .94!

:itin Gro)5& 1".293 37 .278

Total 1".324 39

#ost .oc Tests

Multiple "omparisons

T)ke* ;SD

De5endent +aria


18/38

0#S0#M .393 .2"8 .1!7 -.12 .9"

MD0N .143 .49 .9!" -1."" 1.29

MD0N0#M .2!" .4! .848 -.8 1.3

0#S -.143 .49 .9!" -1.29 1.""


0#M 0#S -.173 .18 .2 -.3 .28MD0N ."42 .4"7 .994 -.9! 1."4

0#S0#M .173 .18 .2 -.28 .3

MD0N .214 .418 .8 -.81 1.23

MD0N0#M -."42 .4"7 .994 -1."4 .9!

0#S -.214 .418 .8 -1.23 .81


0#M0#S ."!4 .228 .97" -.!" .1

MD0N -.37! .!"" .73! -1.!9 .84

0#S0#M -."!4 .228 .97" -.1 .!"

MD0N -.429 .!13 .84 -1.8 .82

MD0N0#M .37! .!"" .73! -.84 1.!9

0#S .429 .!13 .84 -.82 1.8


0#M0#S .214 .243 .! -.38 .81

MD0N .000 .!32 1.""" -1.3" 1.3"

0#S0#M -.214 .243 .! -.81 .38

MD0N -.214 .!47 .919 -1.!! 1.12

MD0N0#M .000 .!32 1.""" -1.3" 1.3"

0#S .214 .!47 .919 -1.12 1.!!


0#M

0#S .19 .21! .34 -.33 .72

MD0N .2! .49 .387 -.!2 1.77

0#S0#M -.19 .21! .34 -.72 .33

MD0N .429 .482 .!1 -.7! 1.1

MD0N0#M -.2! .49 .387 -1.77 .!2

0#S -.429 .482 .!1 -1.1 .7!


19/38


0#M0#S .22 .2"3 .!13 -.27 .72

MD0N ."83 .44! .981 -1."" 1.17

0#S0#M -.22 .2"3 .!13 -.72 .27

MD0N -.143 .4!7 .948 -1.2 .97

MD0N 0#M -."83 .44! .981 -1.17 1.""0#S .143 .4!7 .948 -.97 1.2


#verage

0#M0#S ."!833 .17737 .942 -.3747 .4914

MD0N ."4833 .38817 .991 -.8994 .991

0#S0#M -."!833 .17737 .942 -.4914 .3747

MD0N -."1""" .3987" 1.""" -.9834 .934

MD0N 0#M -."4833 .38817 .991 -.991 .8994

0#S ."1""" .3987" 1.""" -.934 .9834

Di!!e"e#es o t$e T"a%itioa& Note-Ta'i( S#a&e Amo( Di!!e"et Co&&e(es

Traditional Note-Taking College MeanStandardDeviation

F - value Sig Decision on Ho Interpretation

I feel good about taking notes on a paper/notebook.

CM 3.71 ".!!

".781 ".4! ccepted Not Signi!cantCS 3.43 ".8!2

MDC"N 3.! ".7"7

I a# able to take notes faster b$ %riting

on a paper/ notebook.

CM 3.2! ".!32

1.8"4 ".179 ccepted Not Signi!cantCS 3.4 ".74!

MDC"N 3.! ".7"7

I can understand t&e concept %&en I takenotes on a paper/ notebook.

CM 3.!4 ".!"9

".4! ".32 ccepted Not Signi!cantCS 3.71 ".11

MDC"N 3.! ".7"7

I al%a$s get a clear idea of %&at t&e CM 3.3 ".49! ".349 ".7"8 ccepted Not Signi!cant


20/38

instructor discussed %&en I take notes on apaper/ notebook.

CS 3.!7 ".938

MDC"N 4 "

I learn best %&en I take notes on a paper/notebook.

CM 3.! ".!9

".399 ".74 ccepted Not Signi!cantCS 3.29 ".914

MDC"N 3.! ".7"7

I feel I &ave an e'cient s$ste# %&en Itake notes on a paper/ notebook.

CM 3.3 ".!7

1.132 ".333 ccepted Not Signi!cantCS 3.43 ".7!

MDC"N 3 "

"n t&e %&ole( I a# able to perfor# %ell in#$ class %&en I take notes on a paper/

notebook.

CM 3.!8 ".!"4

".18 ".!4! ccepted Not Signi!cantCS 3.3 ".74!

MDC"N 3.! ".7"7

Composite Mean

CM 3.!483 ".3821

"."!7 ".94! ccepted Not Signi!cantCS 3.49 ".72!23

MDC"N 3.! ".2998

#$S% !&S'TS

*newa+ (Digital Note-Taking)

Descripti,es


$oer o)nd 55er o)nd

Digital Note-Taking 1 0#M 24 2.!4 .!88 .12" 2.29 2.79 1 3


21/38

0#S 14 2.29 .82! .221 1.81 2.7 1 4

MD0N 2 3."" 1.414 1.""" -9.71 1!.71 2 4

Total 4" 2.48 .71 .113 2.2! 2.7" 1 4


0#M 24 3."8 .!4 .133 2.81 3.3 2 4

0#S 14 2.!" .941 .2!1 1.9 3."4 1 4

MD0N 2 3."" .""" .""" 3."" 3."" 3 3

Total 4" 2.88 .791 .12! 2.2 3.13 1 4


0#M 24 2.!4 .!88 .12" 2.29 2.79 2 4

0#S 14 2.4 .842 .22! 2.1 3.13 1 4

MD0N 2 3.!" .7"7 .!"" -2.8! 9.8! 3 4

Total 4" 2.3 .7"! .111 2.4" 2.8! 1 4


0#M 24 2.4 .!8 .134 2.18 2.74 2 4

0#S 14 2.3 .74! .199 1.93 2.79 1 3

MD0N 2 3.!" .7"7 .!"" -2.8! 9.8! 3 4Total 4" 2.48 .71 .113 2.2! 2.7" 1 4


0#M 24 2.38 .47 .132 2.1" 2.! 1 4

0#S 14 2.!" .8!! .228 2."1 2.99 1 4

MD0N 2 3.!" .7"7 .!"" -2.8! 9.8! 3 4

Total 4" 2.48 .7!1 .119 2.23 2.72 1 4

Digital Note-Taking

0#M 24 2.!8 .717 .14 2.28 2.89 2 4

0#S 14 2.!" .!" .174 2.12 2.88 1 3

MD0N 2 2.!" .7"7 .!"" -3.8! 8.8! 2 3

Total 4" 2.!! .77 .1"7 2.33 2.77 1 4


0#M 24 2.4 .!"9 .1"4 2.24 2.7 2 3

0#S 14 2.!" .7" .2"3 2." 2.94 1 4

MD0N 2 4."" .""" .""" 4."" 4."" 4 4

Total 4" 2.!! .77 .1"7 2.33 2.77 1 4


22/38

Digital Note-Taking #verage

0#M 24 2.!77! .4199 ."943" 2.3824 2.772 2."" 3.71

0#S 14 2.47"" .7"18! .187!8 2."48 2.87!2 1."" 3.43

MD0N 2 3.28!" .4"3"! .28!"" -.333 .9"3 3."" 3.!7

Total 4" 2.!7!3 .!92! ."9""1 2.3932 2.7!73 1."" 3.71

$N*$

S)m o' S()are& d' Mean S()are F Sig.


eteen Gro)5& 1.1" 2 .!8" 1.14" .331

:itin Gro)5& 18.81! 37 .!"9

Total 19.97! 39


eteen Gro)5& 3."42 2 1.!21 2.38 ."8!

:itin Gro)5& 21.333 37 .!77

Total 24.37! 39


eteen Gro)5& 1.7"2 2 .8!1 1.782 .182

:itin Gro)5& 17.73 37 .478

Total 19.37! 39


eteen Gro)5& 2.3"2 2 1.1!1 2.41" .1"4

:itin Gro)5& 17.73 37 .478

Total 19.97! 39


eteen Gro)5& 2.3!" 2 1.17! 2.21! .123

:itin Gro)5& 19.2! 37 .!3"

Total 21.97! 39

Digital Note-Taking

eteen Gro)5& ."7 2 ."33 ."9 .933

:itin Gro)5& 17.833 37 .482

Total 17.9"" 39

Digital Note-Taking 7 eteen Gro)5& 4.442 2 2.221 .1" .""!

:itin Gro)5& 13.4!8 37 .34


23/38

Total 17.9"" 39


eteen Gro)5& 1.13 2 .!81 1.874 .18

:itin Gro)5& 11.47! 37 .31"

Total 12.38 39

#ost .oc Tests


T)ke* ;SD

De5endent +aria


24/38

MD0N0#M .9!8 .!"9 .1!8 -.28 2.2"

0#S .8!7 .!22 .242 -.42 2.13


0#M0#S .1"1 .232 .9"1 -.47 .7

MD0N -1."42 .!"9 .11! -2.28 .2"

0#S 0#M -.1"1 .232 .9"1 -.7 .47MD0N -1.143 .!22 ."87 -2.42 .13

MD0N0#M 1."42 .!"9 .11! -.2" 2.28

0#S 1.143 .!22 ."87 -.13 2.42


0#M0#S -.12! .24! .87 -.72 .47

MD0N -1.12! .!3 .1"4 -2.43 .18

0#S0#M .12! .24! .87 -.47 .72

MD0N -1.""" .!!1 .178 -2.34 .34

MD0N0#M 1.12! .!3 .1"4 -.18 2.43

0#S 1.""" .!!1 .178 -.34 2.34

Digital Note-Taking

0#M0#S ."83 .233 .932 -.49 .!

MD0N ."83 .!11 .98! -1.1 1.33

0#S0#M -."83 .233 .932 -.! .49

MD0N .000 .!2! 1.""" -1.28 1.28

MD0N0#M -."83 .!11 .98! -1.33 1.1

0#S .000 .!2! 1.""" -1.28 1.28


0#M0#S -."42 .2"3 .977 -.!4 .4!

MD0N -1.!42> .444 .""4 -2.3 -.4

0#S

0#M ."42 .2"3 .977 -.4! .!4

MD0N -1.!""> .4! ."" -2.1 -.39

MD0N0#M 1.!42> .444 .""4 .4 2.3

0#S 1.!""> .4! ."" .39 2.1

Digital Note-Taking #verage 0#M 0#S .1"7!" .18729 .83! -.3498 .!48


25/38

MD0N -.7"7!" .4"987 .2"9 -1.7"82 .2932

0#S0#M -.1"7!" .18729 .83! -.!48 .3498

MD0N -.81!"" .42"98 .143 -1.8428 .2128

MD0N

0#M .7"7!" .4"987 .2"9 -.2932 1.7"82

0#S .81!"" .42"98 .143 -.2128 1.8428

>. Te mean di''eren,e i& &igni'i,ant at te "."! level.

Di!!e"e#es o t$e Di(ita& Note-Ta'i( S#a&e Amo( Di!!e"et Co&&e(es

Digital Note-Taking College MeanStandardDeviation

F - value SigDecision on

HoInterpretation

I feel good about taking notes on a p&one/tablet.

CM 2.!4 ".!88

1.14 ".331 cceptedNot

Signi!cantCS 2.29 ".82!

MDC"N 3 1.414

I a# able to take notes faster b$ taking apicture of t&e lessons on a p&one/ tablet.

CM 3."8 ".!4

2.38 "."8! cceptedNot

Signi!cantCS 2.! ".941

MDC"N 3 "

I can understand t&e concept %&en I takepicture of t&e lessons on a p&one/ tablet.

CM 2.!4 ".!88


Signi!cantCS 2.4 ".842

MDC"N 3.! ".7"7

I al%a$s get a clear idea of %&at t&einstructor discussed %&en I take notes on a

p&one/ tablet.

CM 2.4 ".!8

2.41 ".1"4 cceptedNot

Signi!cantCS 2.3 ".74!

MDC"N 3.! ".7"7

I learn best %&en I take notes on a p&one/tablet.

CM 2.38 ".47 2.21! ".123 ccepted NotSigni!cantCS 2.! ".8!!


26/38

MDC"N 3.! ".7"7

I feel I &ave an e'cient s$ste# %&en I takenotes on a p&one/ tablet.

CM 2.!8 ".717

"."9 ".933 cceptedNot

Signi!cantCS 2.! ".!

MDC"N 2.! ".7"7

"n t&e %&ole( I a# able to perfor# %ell in#$ class %&en I take notes on a p&one/

tablet.

CM 2.4 ".!"9

.1" ".""! ccepted NotSigni!cant

CS 2.! ".7

MDC"N 4 "

Composite Mean

CM 2.!77! ".4199


Signi!cantCS 2.47 ".7"18!

MDC"N 3.28! ".4"3"!

FINDINGS: There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the traditional noteta(ing s'ale among different 'olleges.

There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the digital noteta(ing s'ale among different 'olleges.

CONCLUSION: A''ept +o1 and +o2

INTERPRETATION: All the three *,- 'olleges hae similar oerall iews on the traditional noteta(ing s'ale.

All the three *,- hae similar oerall iews on the digital noteta(ing s'ale.

#$S% !&S'TS

*newa+ (Traditional Note-Taking)

B.,. There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the traditional noteta(ing s'ale among the different age groups. *+ o5-

B.. There is no signifi'ant differen'e on the digital noteta(ing s'ale among the different age groups. *+ o8-


27/38

Descripti,es


$oer o)nd 55er o)nd


1!-1 2 3."" 1.414 1.""" -9.71 1!.71 2 4

17-18 23 3.1 .! .137 3.32 3.89 2 4

19 and a


28/38

Total 4" 3.!3 .4" .1"1 3.32 3.73 2 4


1!-1 2 3."" .""" .""" 3."" 3."" 3 3

17-18 23 3.48 .!93 .124 3.22 3.73 2 4

19 and a


29/38

:itin Gro)5& 19.38 37 .!24

Total 19.77! 39


eteen Gro)5& .!89 2 .29! .7"9 .499

:itin Gro)5& 1!.38 37 .41

Total 1!.97! 39


eteen Gro)5& .1 2 .33" .917 .4"9

:itin Gro)5& 13.339 37 .31

Total 14.""" 39


#verage

eteen Gro)5& .127 2 ."3 .23" .79

:itin Gro)5& 1".197 37 .27

Total 1".324 39

#ost .oc Tests


T)ke* ;SD

De5endent +aria


30/38

19 and a


31/38

19 and a


32/38

paper/ notebook.19 and a


33/38

Total 4" 2.48 .71 .113 2.2! 2.7" 1 4


1!-1 2 2."" .""" .""" 2."" 2."" 2 2

17-18 23 2.9 .82! .172 2." 3.31 1 4

19 and a


34/38

19 and a


35/38


eteen Gro)5& ."13 2 .""7 ."19 .981

:itin Gro)5& 12.2! 37 .341

Total 12.38 39

#ost .oc Tests


T)ke* ;SD

De5endent +aria


36/38

19 and a


37/38

19 and a


38/38

notes on a p&one/ tablet. Signi!cant17-18 2.! ".714

19 and a

output portfolio8

Documents