overview of assessment results district service plans 2004-2007 district service plans 2004-2007 lea...
TRANSCRIPT
Overview of Assessment Overview of Assessment ResultsResults
District Service Plans 2004-District Service Plans 2004-20072007
LEA Accreditation Visits 2000-LEA Accreditation Visits 2000-20062006
LEA APR Goals 2003-06LEA APR Goals 2003-06 Superintendent Visits 2005-06Superintendent Visits 2005-06
District District Service Service PlansPlans
2004-072004-07
District Service PlansDistrict Service PlansSchool and Community Planning
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Number of Requests
Community/Parent Involvement/SIAC
CSIP
Administrative Meetings/Leadership Teams
DE Site V is it
Facilities
Early Childhood
District Service PlansDistrict Service PlansLeadership
0
5
10
15
20
25
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Number of Requests
Principal's Leadership Academy
Superintendent Meetings
Curriculum Director Meetings
Mentor Training
Contemporary School Leadership
District Service PlansDistrict Service PlansProfessional Development
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Number of Requests
Literacy
Math
Science
Technology Integration/Instructional Technology
HS Improvement
Learning Supports
District Service PlansDistrict Service PlansCurriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
0
5
10
15
20
25
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Number of Requests
Reading
Math
Science
Curriculum Review /Mapping
Online Assessment System
MAP Assessment
IDM
District Service PlansDistrict Service PlansDiverse Learner
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
IDM
At-Risk/Learning SupportsEarly Access/Preschool
TAG
IDEA Requirements
IEP
Special Education Teacher Support
Co-Teaching
Delivery Service Plan
ELL
Number of Requests
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
District Service PlansDistrict Service PlansInclusive Schools
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Number of Requests
Learning Supports
Supportive Learning Environment
Iow a Youth Survey
Inclusion
Cris is Response Plan
District Service PlansDistrict Service PlansMedia
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2004--05 2005-06 2006-07
Number of Requests
Standard Media Services
Instructional Technology/Technology Integration
District Service PlansDistrict Service PlansTechnology
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Number of Requests
Technology Integration/Instructional Technology
Online Assessment System
District Technology Plan
E-Rate
Centerpoint
District Service PlansDistrict Service PlansManagement
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Number of Requests
Financial System
Data Processing
Cooperative Purchasing Program
Online Assessment System
Medicaid Billing
District Service Plans District Service Plans 2004-072004-07
Overall TrendsOverall Trends Variety of Requests are IncreasingVariety of Requests are Increasing Leadership and Curriculum, Leadership and Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment Requests Instruction, Assessment Requests DecreasedDecreased
Professional Development and Professional Development and Diverse Learner Requests IncreasedDiverse Learner Requests Increased
Top 5 Across All Categories:Top 5 Across All Categories: Literacy, Math, Science, Instructional Literacy, Math, Science, Instructional Decision Making, and Online Assessment Decision Making, and Online Assessment System System
LEA LEA AccreditaAccredita
tion tion Visits Visits
2000-20062000-2006
LEA Accreditation VisitsLEA Accreditation Visits2000 LEA Accreditation Recommendations for Improvement
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Cedar Rapids
School District
Number of Recommendations
School Board and Policy Dev.
Needs Assessment, Mission/Vision, LRPlanning, and Comm. Involvement
Personnel Evaluation
Curr. Dev., Implementation, and Eval.
Staff Dev. Programming
Student Achievement/Programming
Other Miscellaneous Concerns
LEA Accreditation LEA Accreditation VisitsVisits
2002 LEA Accreditation Recommendations
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Component Totals
Number of Recommendations
Needs Assessment
Planning
Implementation of the Plan
Evaluation of the Plan
Reporting Progress
Other Issues
LEA Accreditation VisitsLEA Accreditation Visits2003 LEA Accreditation Recommendations
0
5
10
15
20
25
Component Totals
Number of Recommendations
Student Benefit from CSIP
Leadership Aligned w/ CSIP
Monitoring/Adjustment - CSIP
Staff Dev. Aligned w/ CSIP
Alignment of CSIP Components
Other Areas
LEA Accreditation VisitsLEA Accreditation Visits2004-05 LEA Accreditation Recommendations for Improvement
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Component Totals
Number of Recommendations
Student Benef it as a Result of SI
Leadership A ligned w / SI
Implementation of Action Plan for SI
PD aligned w ith SI
Eval./Reporting of SI
Other A reas
LEA Accreditation VisitsLEA Accreditation Visits2005-06 LEA Accreditation Recommendations for Improvement
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Component Totals
Number of Recommendations
What do data tell us about student learning needs?
What do/will we do to meet the student learning needs?
How do/will we know that student learning has changed?
How will we evaluate our programs/services to ensure student learning?
Other Areas
LEA Accreditation VisitsLEA Accreditation Visits
Overall Trends - RecommendationsOverall Trends - Recommendations Needs Assessment and PlanningNeeds Assessment and Planning
What are we doing to meet the student What are we doing to meet the student
learning needs? How will we know?learning needs? How will we know?
Student Benefit of CSIP and SIStudent Benefit of CSIP and SI
LEA Accreditation VisitsLEA Accreditation Visits2000-2006 LEA Accreditation Non-Compliance Citations
107
14 14 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 6 213
63
279
38%43%
48% 51% 54%57% 60% 62% 65% 67% 70% 72% 73%
77%
100% 100%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Teacher Record of License/CertificationStudent Responsibility and Discipline
Provisions for Gifted and Talented StudentsData Collection, Analysis, Goal Setting
Community Involvement - SIACProvisions for Staff Development
Section 33.3Policy Manual
Physical ExaminationVocational Education
Provisions for At-Risk Students
Personnel Evaluation
Responses w/ 5
Responses w/ 3 or 4Responses w/ 1or 2
Total N
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Items
Cum. Percent
Graph caption box.
LEA APR LEA APR GoalsGoals
2003-062003-06
Annual Progress Report Annual Progress Report GoalsGoals
Public LEA Summary of APR Goals Met
33%36%
39%42%
30%
55%59%
69%
44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
03-04 04-05 05-06
Percent
Reading
Math
Science
Annual Progress Report Annual Progress Report GoalsGoals
Overall TrendsOverall Trends Reading Goals met have increased by 6%Reading Goals met have increased by 6% Math Goals met have increased by 13%Math Goals met have increased by 13% Science Goals met has decreased by 15%Science Goals met has decreased by 15% Less than 40% are meeting Literacy GoalsLess than 40% are meeting Literacy Goals Less than 60% are meeting Math GoalsLess than 60% are meeting Math Goals Less than 50% are meeting Science GoalsLess than 50% are meeting Science Goals
SuperintendSuperintendent ent
InterviewsInterviews20062006
Superintendent InterviewsSuperintendent Interviews
Superintendent's Question #1: As you look forward, on what areas do you intend to focus?
How can GW assist?
20 2014
8 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
14
28
142
14%
28%
38%44%
47%50% 53%
56% 58% 60% 62% 64% 66% 68% 70%
80%
100% 100%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Reading
Special Education
Math
Technology Assistance
Infuse technology with instruction
Science
Staff/Professional Development
Site VisitLeadership
MAP/NWEA Support
Climate/cultureEarly Childhood
More SLP time/caseload too big
Facilities
Differentiated Instruction
Responses w/2Responses w/1
Total N
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%Items
Cum. Percent
47% of responses
indicated
continuing/emerging
needs in reading,
special education, math,
technology assistance,
and integrating
technology into
instruction.
There w ere 142
responses to this year's
question and 73
separate areas of
interest. 16 categories
that w ere identif ied as
needs last year
received no mention in
this year's series of
interview s. 30
categories on year's lis t
of needs did not receive
mention in 2005.
Superintendent InterviewsSuperintendent Interviews
Superintendent's Question #3: Are there specific services you would like enhanced or
eliminated/reduced?
75 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2
27
63
11%
19%25%
32%37%
41%44%
48%51%
54%57%
100% 100%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
IDM Implementation & school improvement
WEC SupportTechnology
Align curr. Consult w/ school initiatives
CenterPoint
On-line assessment
NWEA
Leadership for administrators
Social work supportFinancial planning
On-site supportResponses w/1
Total N
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%Items
Cum. Percent
Responses w ere
spread out among 63
comments w ith
enhancing IDM
implementation and
school improvement
lis ted as #1.
There w ere only 3
"eliminate/reduce" votes,
one each for: too many
meetings, moving f rom
services to state
mandates, and media.
Superintendent InterviewsSuperintendent Interviews
Overall TrendsOverall Trends Focus Areas Needing GW AssistanceFocus Areas Needing GW Assistance
ReadingReading Special EducationSpecial Education MathMath
Specific Areas to EnhanceSpecific Areas to Enhance Instructional Decision Making/School Instructional Decision Making/School ImprovementImprovement
District Service District Service PlansPlans
LiteracyLiteracyMathMath
ScienceScienceInstructional Instructional Decision MakingDecision Making
LEA Accreditation LEA Accreditation VisitsVisits
What do we do to meet What do we do to meet student learning student learning
needs? How will we needs? How will we know student know student learning has learning has changed?changed?
APR GoalsAPR Goals
ReadingReading
MathMath
ScienceScience
Superintendent Superintendent InterviewsInterviewsReadingReading
MathMath
Special EducationSpecial Education
Instructional Instructional Decision MakingDecision Making