p arenting styles and social development

36
BOARD WORK: HOW DO YOU THINK YOUR GENERATION WILL DIFFER FROM MINE AS A RESULT OF THE EVENTS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001?

Upload: keenan

Post on 23-Feb-2016

45 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Board work: How do you think your generation will differ from mine as a result of the events on September 11, 2001? . The way in which a child is raised has a tremendous role in their outcome as productive adults. What are your parents like? Strict? Easy going? Checked out? . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: P arenting Styles and Social Development

BOARD WORK: HOW DO YOU THINK YOUR GENERATION WILL DIFFER FROM MINE AS A RESULT OF THE EVENTS ON SEPTEMBER 11,

2001?

Page 2: P arenting Styles and Social Development

THE WAY IN WHICH A CHILD IS RAISED HAS A TREMENDOUS ROLE IN THEIR OUTCOME AS PRODUCTIVE ADULTS.

WHAT ARE YOUR PARENTS LIKE? STRICT? EASY GOING? CHECKED OUT?

Page 3: P arenting Styles and Social Development

PARENTING STYLES AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

Psychologist Diana Baumrind studied the parent-child relationship and came up with 4 different styles of parenting that greatly impact the child’s outcome.

Authoritarian familiesDemocratic/authoritative familiesPermissive/Laissez-faire familiesUninvolved Parent (not included in your book)

Page 4: P arenting Styles and Social Development

PARENTING STYLES

Parents are bosses

No questions or child participation

A dictatorship

Children participate Discussion and

negotiation Children make

decisions, but parents have veto power

A democracy

Authoritarian Democratic-Authoritative Parents

Page 5: P arenting Styles and Social Development

PARENTING STYLES (CONTINUED)

Children have the final say

Parents give in to children

Give up—no rules; ignore children

Egocentric Uncommitted to

being a parent Distant from

children

Permissive—Laissez-faire Uninvolved Parent

Page 6: P arenting Styles and Social Development
Page 7: P arenting Styles and Social Development

EFFECTS OF PARENTING STYLES Which style do you think is most effective?

Why?

Answer: Democratic/Authoritative Families

Page 8: P arenting Styles and Social Development

DEMOCRATIC/AUTHORITATIVE FAMILIES Adolescents are more confident of values and

goals

Two factors are involved:

1. Establishment of limits2. Responding to child with warmth

and support

Page 9: P arenting Styles and Social Development

CONTINUED Children more likely to want to make their own

decisions Assume responsibility gradually

-not denied the opportunity (authoritarian)

-not given too much too soon (permissive)

Identify with parents- those who show love and respect - not those who treat children as incompetent

Present a model of responsible, cooperative independence the growing person to imitate

Page 10: P arenting Styles and Social Development

NOTE: Parents are not solely responsible for the way

their children turn out

Who else? Children themselves

Page 11: P arenting Styles and Social Development

CHILD ABUSE Child Abuse: Includes

the physical or mental injury, sexual abuse, negligent treatment, or mistreatment of children under the age of 18 by adults entrusted with their care.

Accurate statistics are difficult to compile, but in 2003 about 3 million cases were reported. After investigation, about 906,000 cases were confirmed.

Page 12: P arenting Styles and Social Development

WHAT CAUSES THIS? Child abuse results from many

different causes. Many abusive parents were

themselves mistreated as children, suggesting that such parents may have learned an inappropriate way of caring for their children.

Such parents tend to use harsh physical discipline with their children and have very little patience.

Often, abusive parents have unrealistic expectations of their children as well.

Page 13: P arenting Styles and Social Development

SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Socialization: The process of learning the

rules of behavior of the culture within which an individual is born and will live.

Can anyone explain this? In order to live with other people, a child has

to learn what is considered both acceptable and unacceptable.

So, the process of socialization should be easy right? Why?

Page 14: P arenting Styles and Social Development

SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Some social rules are stable, some are open

to interpretation, and some change on a daily basis!

Differences in social behavior of boys and girls. Examples? Fair?

Page 15: P arenting Styles and Social Development

SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Socialization not only involves

learning the rules and “norms” of society, but also ideas, sexual characteristics, culture, and how to live with other people and yourself.

Another primary part of learning the socialization process is learning your limitations and physical abilities.Example: A “4” year old who

realizes she cannot hit a softball on the first try while other children can, knows how painful it can be to discover her limitations.

Page 16: P arenting Styles and Social Development

FREUD’S THEORY OF PSYCHOSEXUAL DEVELOPMENT! Sigmund Freud (who

we have already talked about) believed that all children are born with powerful sexual and aggressive urges!

According to Freud, in learning to control these impulses, children acquire a sense of right and wrong. The results are different for boys and girls.

Page 17: P arenting Styles and Social Development

PSYCHOSEXUAL DEVELOPMENT According to Freud, in the first few years of

life, boys and girls have similar experiences. Their erotic pleasures are obtained through

the mouth, sucking at their mother’s breast. Further, Freud states, that weaning the child

from nursing is a period of frustration and conflict – it is the child’s first experience with not getting what he wants.

Page 18: P arenting Styles and Social Development

FREUD’S STAGES OF PSYCHOSEXUAL DEVELOPMENT!According to Freud, there are “5” basic

stages of psychosexual development.

1. Oral Stage – Infant pleasure from mouth/first 18 months of life.

2. Anal Stage – Infant pleasure from “elimination”/1½ -3 3. Phallic Stage – Infant pleasure from genitals/ 3-6 years. 4. Latency Stage – Sexual thoughts repressed. Focus on

social/intellectual skills/ 6 years to puberty. 5. Genital Stage – Sexual desires are renewed. Thoughts

of relationships. (puberty through adulthood)

Page 19: P arenting Styles and Social Development

SPECIAL NOTES ABOUT STAGES… According to Freud, during the “Phallic

Stage,” the child becomes a rival for the affections of the parent of the opposite sex!

The boy wants to win his mother for himself and finds himself in hostile conflict with his father.

The girl wants her father for herself and tries to shut out her mother.

Freud goes on to say that these struggles take place on an unconscious level!

Page 20: P arenting Styles and Social Development

A FEW DEFINITIONS… Identification: The process by which a

child adopts the values and principles of the same-sex parent.(occurs between 3-5 years old, in the phallic stage)

Sublimation: The process of redirecting sexual impulses into learning tasks. (occurs 6 years old, in the latency stage)

Page 21: P arenting Styles and Social Development

ERIKSON’S THEORY OF PSYCHOSOCIAL DEVELOPMENT!

Erikson’s Theory of

Psychosocial Development!

Page 22: P arenting Styles and Social Development

ERIKSON’S THEORY OF PSYCHOSOCIAL DEVELOPMENT! Erik Erikson 1902 – 1994 Uses a much

“broader” view of human development than Freud did.

Childhood is an “interactive process.” The child is constantly growing as he reaches milestones and interacts with others.

Page 23: P arenting Styles and Social Development

PSYCHOSOCIAL DEVELOPMENT - ERIKSON Although Erikson recognizes a child’s sexual

and aggressive urges, he believes that the need for social approval is just as important.

In order to assess whether or not his beliefs made sense, Erikson studied what he called Psychosocial Development.

Psychosocial Development: Life periods in which an individual’s goal is to satisfy desires associated with social needs.

Page 24: P arenting Styles and Social Development

PSYCHOSOCIAL DEVELOPMENT While Erikson

believes that childhood experiences have a lasting impact on the individual, he also sees development as a lifelong interactive process between people.

Page 25: P arenting Styles and Social Development
Page 26: P arenting Styles and Social Development

CRISES! Erikson argues that we all face

many crises as we grow from infancy to old age, as we mature, and as people expect more from us.

Each of these crises represents an issue that everyone faces.

The child, adolescent, or adult may develop more strongly in one way or another, depending on how other people respond to his or her efforts.

Page 27: P arenting Styles and Social Development

EXAMPLE A 2-year old is delighted with

his newfound ability to walk, to get into things, to use words, and to ask questions. The very fact that he has acquired these abilities adds to his self-esteem, and he is eager to use them. If the adults around him applaud his efforts, he begins to develop a sense of independence.

Predict what will happen if the baby is ignored?

Page 28: P arenting Styles and Social Development

LEARNING THEORIES OF DEVELOPMENT Both Freud and Erikson stress the emotional

dynamics of social development. They believe children learn the ways of their social world because they are rewarded for conforming and because they copy older children and adults in anticipation of future rewards.

Page 29: P arenting Styles and Social Development

COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT APPROACH Sees the child as the shaper – they help mold

themselves

. The games children play illustrate this.

When children are left alone to play with one another, they must learn to: 1. agree. 2. relax and enjoy themselves. 3. adhere to established rules. 4. get along with each other.

Page 30: P arenting Styles and Social Development

CHILDREN’S GAMES Much of children’s play

involves “role taking.” Role Taking: Children’s

play that involves assuming adult roles, thus enabling the child to experience different points of view.

When role taking, youngsters try on such adult roles as mother, father, teacher, storekeeper, explorer, and rock star!

Page 31: P arenting Styles and Social Development

MORE “ROLE TAKING” Role Taking allows

children to experience different points of view first hand.

Example: One child may play the role of a mother, while the other child acts as a whiny baby. The children may then learn the frustrations of an actual parent.

What might this cause?

Page 32: P arenting Styles and Social Development

LAWRENCE KOHLBERG 1927 – 1987 Studied social and

moral development. What is right, and what

is wrong. Looked at many

different ages.

Page 33: P arenting Styles and Social Development

Stage 1 = children are egocentric. Cant consider other people’s points of views and have no sense of right and wrong.

Stage 2 = Have a better idea of how to receive awards and avoid punishment

Stage 3 = children become acutely sensitive to what other people want and think. They desire social approval.

Stage 4 = child is less concerned with the approval of others and rather adheres to moral codes of right and wrong.

Page 34: P arenting Styles and Social Development

STAGES OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT (PAGE 86)

Topic of example, “stealing drugs!”

Level Stage Orientation Example

Pre-Conventional

1

2

Obedience/Punish

Relativist

Ok if not caught

Ok if helps family

Conventional 3

4

Good boy/nice girl

Law & Order

Respect for help

Illegal

Post-Conventional

5

6

Social Contract

Universal Ethics

OK = high cost

Reversed

Page 35: P arenting Styles and Social Development

CONTINUED To reach the highest levels of moral

development, a child must first be able to see other people’s point of view. Yet this understanding is no guarantee that a person will respect the rights of others. Thus, the development of thinking or cognitive abilities influences moral development.

Page 36: P arenting Styles and Social Development

WRAP UP Determine how well your beliefs agree with

those of your parents. How important do you think your early social training was for what you believe?