pakistan- islamic or secular?
DESCRIPTION
With the turmoil and calamities taking charge of the present situation in Pakistan, the youth remain confused about their destined ideology. One group believes that Pakistan is bound to be a secular state, whereas others consider Islam as the answer to every question. In this debate, the question that eventually comes up is "What did our forefathers want?". Did the Quaid want secularism? Or did he want Islamic ways of governance? If Quaid e Azam was in fact a secular leader, why did his right-hand man, Liaquat Ali Khan, pass the objectives resolution which clearly states that any law that contradicts the Quran and Sunnah will be abolished? If Allama Iqbal is our visionary, how can secularism be our destiny? Logic and facts must be combined to display the truth sincerely, and this riddle must be solved immediately, because "nations can never be truly themselves if they are not true to themselves...TRANSCRIPT
2
Contents:
Introduction
Secularism and its
relevance to Pakistan
Islam and its relevance to
Pakistan
Comparison
How can Islam help
Pakistan today?
Conclusion
Bibliography
Pg 3
Pg 4
Pg 9
Pg 16
Pg 23
Pg 26
Pg 27
3
Pakistan- Islamic or
Secular?
What is the destined state ideology
of Pakistan? There has always been
an argument about the question just
asked. This argument has not been
as widely debated about in the
history of Pakistan as it is being
today.
It has only recently caught the
media’s attention and every citizen
of Pakistan wants to know the truth.
The youth especially, which has been
confused over the years about what
their forefathers wanted, what this
country was actually made for, and
what is the vision. Did they want a
Secular state? Or did they want pure
foundations of Islamic Socialism?
There is infinite debate about this in
the country and sometimes this
debate is referred to as the
ideological war being fought inside
the country. People who support
Secularism are blamed to be agents
of foreign agencies, as the righteous
majority of Pakistan believes that
our elders wanted pure foundations
of Islamic ways of living and
governance in the country. But at the
same time, some people who
support Islamic Socialism and
Governance are blamed to be
radicals and extremists. However,
such accusations usually come from
foreign analysts. Why was this
confusion created? There cannot be
a solid conclusion for this debate
unless both ideologies and their
relevance to Pakistan is understood.
This is necessary to seek the light.
4
Secularism and its relevance to
Pakistan:
The dictionary definition for the
word “secular” in political terms is
“denoting attitudes, activities, or
other things that have no religious
or spiritual basis”. In simple words,
secular is something that has
nothing to do with religion. In Urdu,
this word is translated to “la-‐deen”.
“La” meaning no, and “deen”
translating to religion. Similarly, the
definition for the word “secularism”
is “the view that religious
considerations should be excluded
from civil affairs or public
education”. Secularism is a new and
recent concept, compared to most
other political concepts. The main
purpose defined by the ambassadors
of this concept is to eliminate the
religious conflicts between people to
create global peace. Today, the
majority of the world is mentally
oriented towards following the
precepts of secularism. Although the
implementation of secularism hasn’t
actually brought any global peace,
there still is a huge argument all
around the world about the validity
of this concept. The neighbor of
Islamic Republic of Pakistan, India, is
one of the largest secular democratic
states. And at the same time, India is
imploding with religious conflicts
inside the country. According to
Opinion Maker, there are an
estimated 30 insurgency groups in
the secular country, most of which
are based on religious conflicts and
discrimination; whereas there are
other (reliable) reports of more than
80 insurgencies active in India.
5
Therefore this concept is not as
dazzling as it seems, but nonetheless
there are a massive number of
humans who recognize and follow
this system, even in Muslim
countries like Pakistan. There are a
notable number of secular people,
mostly in the media and such
outlets, who have been publicizing
that concept in Pakistan for a while
now.
This has not happened with such
frequency before in Pakistan, and
maybe that is the reason the youth
hasn’t been so confused before. The
secularists believe that the rights of
Non-‐Muslims in Pakistan are target
of negligence. They also have faith in
the judgment that the Islamic rule of
law in Pakistan, and the Pro-‐Islamic
mindsets of the majority of Pakistani
people have caused discrimination
of not only Non-‐Muslims, but even of
the lower class in Pakistan that are
apparently being treated very badly.
The followers of secularism have
also attacked the blasphemy law.
The law that is criticized by almost
all foreign communities, but still
operational in Pakistan is the
blasphemy law. The constitution of
Pakistan states:
• Whoever willfully defiles,
damages or desecrates a copy
of the Holy Qur'an or of an
extract therefrom or uses it in
any derogatory manner or for
any unlawful purpose shall be
punishable with
imprisonment for life.
• Whoever by words, either
spoken or written, or by
visible representation or by
any imputation, innuendo, or
6
insinuation, directly or
indirectly, defiles the sacred
name of the Holy Prophet
Muhammad (peace be upon
him) shall be punished with
death, or imprisonment for
life, and shall also be liable to
fine.
The Islamic Republic of Pakistan is
known to have the strictest
blasphemy law among Muslim
majority countries. This only gives a
small idea of the religious
sentiments that reside in this
ideological state.
There have been a number of recent
controversies regarding Pakistan,
and the secular minded citizens have
taken advantage of such events. In
June 2009, Asia Bibi was arrested for
being accused of blasphemy against
the Holy Prophet (peace be upon
him). She was sentenced to death by
hanging in November 2010, but after
the case reached media attention
with the help of Pakistani
secularists, it was delayed and is still
pending in the Supreme Court of
Pakistan. This case had been a huge
argument in Pakistan, and two
politicians were assassinated for
opposing the blasphemy law
regarding Asia Bibi (one of whom
was a Christian). Secular minded
columnists and anchors took this
case abroad with the help of their
media outlets, and portrayed Asia
Bibi’s story through her own eyes.
Even Pope Benedict in Vatican
issued a statement demanding
release of Asia Bibi, which raged
many Muslim scholars inside the
country. The policy of no
compromise when it comes to
blasphemy, and the unexplainable
emotions and sentiments of the
Pakistani Muslims attached to their
Prophet (peace be upon him) have
given liberals tough time in this
country. The Asia Bibi
Salman Taseer case, followed by the assassination
of ex-‐Governor of Punjab-‐ Salman
Taseer and former Minister of
Minorities Affairs -‐Shahbaz Bhatti
created a good scenario for liberal
parties to proliferate their mindsets.
Shahbaz Bhatti
But Secularism’s roots in Pakistan
date back to the 1960s. In the book
Shahabnama by Qudratullah Shahab,
a significant event regarding
Pakistan’s name, “Islamic Republic
of Pakistan” is discussed. Here is a
passage from the book that explains
this peculiar event:
“After the passing of 1962 constitution, I noticed something peculiar that in all the documents of the government, the word ‘Islam’ was not written with the name of Pakistan. First, I thought that it might be an error in the drafting, but after some days I came to know that the error was repeated several times and it seemed more intentional than unintentional. I wrote a note to President Ayub Khan to allow me to write a letter to all the ministries about this frequent error. One evening, He came to me and told me that it is not an error but we have taken this decision with a general consensus. President Ayub Khan told me that the name of Pakistan will be “Republic of Pakistan” instead of “Islamic Republic of Pakistan“. If I had the courage, I would have asked him: “Who are you to
8
eliminate the word ‘Islam’ from the name of Pakistan?” However I came back home and wrote a two pages note, the summary of which is as following: Pakistan has no escape from Islam. The history of this country is very old but its geography is new. The Red-cliff line between Pakistan and India was drawn for the purpose that we acquired this piece of land on the name of Islam. If now Islam is erased from the name of Pakistan, the limitation of this line will have no meaning. We became Pakistan for the sole reason that we are Muslims. If Afghanistan, Iran, Egypt, Iraq and Turkey eliminate Islam from their lives, they would still retain their identity as Afghans, Iranian, Egyptian, Iraqi and Turks. But if we, Pakistanis, try to escape from Islam, Pakistan will not have any distinction of its own. Now, if Islam suits our luxurious life or not, Islam fits to our way of life or not, We personally follow Islam or not, the truth is that whether for the sake of saving our hereafter or for the worldly profit and selfishness, we are compelled to keep Pakistan and Islam parallel to each other for the sake of the long lasting of Pakistan. Due to the illiteracy of others, there is no need to go into the inferiority complex yourself.
In addition to this note, I also wrote a resignation letter to resign if this note is not accepted. Next Day President Ayub came to me to tell me something, He sat in front of me and took that note from my hand and started reading it. After reading few sentences, his facial expressions changed suddenly and he started reading from the beginning again. Then he said slowly: “Yes, Right You
Are” and repeated this sentence again, and hence the word ‘Islam’ was added to the name of Pakistan.” (Excerpt from the book Shahabnama).
Qudratullah Shahab
This excerpt, apart from providing
immense support for the Islamic
ideology to be established in
Pakistan, explains how the face of
secularism was emerging in some
people. The consensus had a
majority of people who would
considerably see Pakistan as
“Republic of Pakistan” rather than
Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Although, this is the same Field
Marshal who is known to have
lighted the spark of Islam among the
people of Pakistan during his last
months as President, him and his
9
cabinet were somewhat secular in
the start. This is where secularism
in Pakistan dates back to.
The secularists in Pakistan have
never been more powerful than they
are today, and they are availing
every inch of this opportunity to
create more secular mindsets in
Pakistan. It is a highly significant fact
that secularism became more
outspoken and blunt in Muslim
states after 9/11, especially in
Pakistan. Giving an example of their
outspokenness, a popular liberal
individual who has been working
with human rights groups in
Pakistan, Marvi Sermid, deliberately
challenged the two-‐nation (coined
by the visionary of Pakistan, Dr.
Muhammad Iqbal himself) and
stated “Pakistan will God willing
soon become a secular state”. She
gave this statement in Dr. Shahid
Masood’s TV program called
“Shahidnama” on Express TV. Noting
that such an open challenge, or
rather offense to the recognized
founding ideology of Pakistan had
never been made on live TV before,
this was considerably surprising for
the public.
Islam and Pakistan:
There are only two ideological
nations in the world, Israel and
Pakistan. Israel is supposedly based
on Jewish ideology, whereas
Pakistan was created in the name of
Islam. The Islamic ideology has
massively shaped Pakistan’s politics,
social environment, military,
constitution and even its borders;
the borders of Pakistan are based on
Muslim majority states dating back
to British India. Its visionary and
national poet, Dr. Muhammad Iqbal
(also known as Allama Iqbal) was
one of the greatest Islamic
ideologists ever born in the Sub-‐
Continent.
10
Allama Iqbal
The proclaimed foundations of the
constitution of Pakistan, The
Objectives Resolution, demands that
the constitution of Pakistan must be
based on the teachings of the Holy
Quran and the Holy Prophet (peace
be upon him). It was passed by
Liaquat Ali Khan, the first Prime
Minister of Pakistan and the right-‐
hand man of Quaid e Azam himself.
The resolution states:
1. Sovereignty belongs to Allah alone but He has delegated it to the State of Pakistan through its people for being exercised within the limits
prescribed by Him as a sacred trust.
2. The State shall exercise its powers and authority through the chosen representatives of the people.
3. The principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and social justice, as enunciated by Islam, shall be fully observed.
4. Muslims shall be enabled to order their lives in the individual and collective spheres in accordance with the teachings of Islam as set out in the Holy Quran and Sunnah.
5. Adequate provision shall be made for the minorities to freely profess and practice their religions and develop their cultures.
6. Pakistan shall be a federation.
7. Fundamental rights shall be guaranteed.
8. Judiciary shall be independent. Such facts illuminate the Pakistani
people’s immense bond with the
ideology of Islam. In the TV program
“Yeh Ghazi”, Mr. Zaid Hamid even
said that Mohammad bin Qasim, the
conqueror of Sindh in 712 AD
(present day Pakistan), was the first
Pakistani citizen. There are
numerous speeches of Quaid e Azam
in which he talks about a perfect
Islamic state, which shall make its
11
own system, to repair the damage
that previous systems have done. In
his last speech, at the occasion of
opening ceremony of the State Bank
of Pakistan, Mr. Jinnah said:
“I shall watch with keenness the work of your Research Organization in evolving banking practices compatible with Islamic ideas of social and economic life. The economic system of the West has created almost insoluble problems for humanity and to many of us it appears that only a miracle can save it from disaster that is not facing the world. It has failed to do justice between man and man and to eradicate friction from the international field. On the contrary, it was largely responsible for the two world wars in the last half century. The Western world, in spite of its advantages, of mechanization and industrial efficiency is today in a worse mess than ever before in history. The adoption of Western economic theory and practice will not help us in achieving our goal of creating a happy and contended people. We must work our destiny in our own way and present to the world an economic system based on true Islamic concept of equality of manhood and social justice. We will thereby be fulfilling our mission as Muslims and giving to humanity the message of peace which alone can save it and secure the welfare, happiness and prosperity of mankind. May the Sate Bank of Pakistan prosper and fulfill the high ideals which have been set as its goal”
Quaid e Azam at the inauguration of the State bank of Pakistan Islamic sentiments have always been
traveling with Pakistan, its leaders
and its people throughout its
journey. Pakistan’s nuclear weapons
are known as the “Islamic Bomb”,
because of the nation being the only
Muslim country to possess nuclear
arms. Its struggle was based on
independence of Muslims from the
unjust rule of Hindus of that time.
The slogan roared most frequently
by millions of Muslims during the
Pakistan movement was “Pakistan
ka matlab kya? La ilaha ilAllah”,
meaning “What is the meaning of
Pakistan? There is no God but Allah”,
and this motto still stirs the souls of
Pakistanis today. Such enthusiasm
revolving around Islam clearly
shows the connection of Pakistanis
with their religion.
Today, Pakistan is standing on the
plains of a decision-‐making scenario.
The youth is confused. There is a
large secular part, which has been
discussed already (pages 4-‐9), and
similarly there is a number of
Islamic idealists seeking to revive
the ideology and poetry of Allama
Iqbal and getting the youth to where,
as they confirm, their forefathers
wanted them to be. These warriors
of media warfare have recently
stepped up with the agenda to
expose every single conspiracy
against Pakistan, and to get the
youth to study Iqbal and Islam again.
Many of these warriors have been
labeled “conspiracy theorists”. One
of the interviewees for this
magazine, Mr. Zaid Hamid is one of
the most renowned preachers of
spiritual foundations of Pakistan.
His, along with many other pro-‐
Islamic analysts’ argument is that
Quaid e Azam and Allama Iqbal
wanted Pakistan to be purely
Islamic. They openly claim that
Pakistan was created for a bigger
purpose and greater reason;
Khilafat. The pro-‐Islamic ideologists
of Pakistan have used the media and
their powerful speeches, to motivate
a vast fraction of the youth to work
for an Islamic political system in
Pakistan.
On Mubasshar Luqman’s show aired
on Dunya TV in Pakistan, the leader
(grandson of Khan of Qallat) of a
separatist movement in Baluchistan
was interviewed and was asked why
Zaid Hamid
13
they joined Pakistan in the first
place, and why in such crucial times
they are rebelling. His answer still
makes one think about the depth of
Pakistan’s connection with Islam.
The grandson of Khan of Qallat said:
“I asked the same question to my father. And he said that his father, my grandfather, Khan of Qallat, was the leader of Baluchistan. Quad e Azam was his lawyer and he represented the Qallat State. During independence movement, Quaid e Azam offered my grandfather to join Pakistan. My grandfather was a bit reluctant. But one night, he saw a dream in which Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) ordered my grandfather to join the Muslim movement. That is why Baluchistan is with Pakistan today”. This is just one of the many
undeniable arguments presented by
the pro-‐Islamic people of Pakistan. It
would be rather offensive to not
realize the enormous love for Islam,
the Prophet (peace be upon him)
and the Holy Quran that the majority
of the Pakistani people have. This
force -‐ the ideology, is regarded as
the most powerful force that resides
in the hearts of the Pakistani people,
especially the youth. It takes only
one romantic speech to get this
nation sacrificing itself in the name
of Islam. The perfect example here
would be the speech of Field
Marshal Ayub Khan, in which he
addressed the Pakistani nation,
commanding them to destroy the
invading forces of India during the
commencement of the 1965 war.
This speech drove the passionate
people of Pakistan so mad, that there
are hundreds of stories of the public
participating itself in the war of
1965, and helping the soldiers in
every possible way. The historic
speech reads:
“My dear fellow countrymen, peace be upon you all. It is time to test the tolerance of 10 million Pakistanis. Early morning today, Indian army attacked the Pakistani city of Lahore. A passenger-‐carrying vehicle was destroyed during this cowardly attack, at Wazirabad station. Indian leaders have always scorned and disrespected the independence of Pakistan, and have condemned the free state for Muslims. India has been planning an assault on Pakistan for the last 18 years. The people of Pakistan, who have “la ilaha ilAllah
14
Muhammad ur Rasool Allah” (There is no God but Allah and Muhammad (peace be upon him) is his Prophet) residing in their heartbeats, will not be calm until the enemy is eliminated forever. The Indian leaders perhaps don’t realize, what nation they have challenged. Our hearts are filled with faith and belief, and we know we are fighting for the right cause. The nation has been put on high alert today. The war has begun. Our gallant soldiers are on the frontline to destroy the enemy. Allah has given us a chance to show our might. My fellow countrymen, move forward and confront the enemy. May Allah be your protector and guardian. Ameen”.
Field Marshal Ayub Khan It is very bizarre after one realizes
that the youth of Pakistan today, has
faced absolutely no challenges
compared to their forefathers – and
at the same time, they are the most
confused generation. The passionate
ones are ready to die for the country,
whether it be against India or any
other hostile state. The secular ones
focus on human rights issues, and
the frustrated ones talk about
joining back with India. Such
confusion is very dangerous for
Pakistan, and giving the state one
proper ideology is a must. Even
though, at the moment Islam is the
state ideology, the country is called
Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the
majority of the Pakistanis are happy
with it. However, the pro-‐Islamic
Pakistanis believe that the actual
Pakistan movement is yet to be
completed. The completion, they
suggest, will be done with the
enforcement of an Islamic political
system. This system will guarantee
that there be no political parties, no
banking system based on interest
and a few other obligations;
basically how Iran looks today. In a
written interview, Ms. Syeda Qudsia
15
Mashhadi, a writer, assured that
Pakistan was created to be an
Islamic state. She said, “Pakistan was
definitely made to be an Islamic
state. Our founding fathers wanted
to establish it on Islamic system of
life”. She supported her answer with
a large number of quotes of Quaid e
Azam, in which it is made clear that
Pakistan and Islam are on the same
page. One of Quaid e Azam’s quotes
cited by Ms. Mashhadi was,
“Pakistan not only means freedom and independence, but also the Muslim Ideology that has to be preserved that has come to us as a precious gift and treasure.” Quaid-‐e-‐Azam, Chittagong, March, 1948.
It is also claimed by pro-‐Islamic
ideologists that there are hundreds
of other speeches of Quaid e Azam in
which he specifically declares that
Pakistan will be based on nothing
but Islamic socialism. As mentioned
before, this is the most decisive era
for Pakistan and the youth will play
a crucial part. Therefore, it is
necessary for the youth’s mindsets
to be mobilized under one ideology.
The Secular-‐Islamic differences have
created an ideological civil war in
Pakistan, and there is no doubt that
it is of high intensity. Again quoting
Mr. Zaid Hamid, a pro-‐Islamic
analyst and ideologist, in the show
Shahidnama, “Whoever tries to
mingle with the spiritual dimensions
of Pakistan, and challenges the
Islamic values here-‐ we will fight
them like we fight our enemies”.
It is understandable, and is
recognized by most Pakistanis, that
Islam was the reason Pakistan was
created. However, with the
expeditious spread of globalism in
the past decades, Pakistani youth
has now been introduced to
Secularism as well. Even if one
agrees that Quaid e Azam wanted a
secular Pakistan, the history of
Pakistan shows that the public has
cared about nothing but the Quran
16
and Sunnah. The destined ideology
for Pakistanis must be recognized
and implemented, whether it be
Islam or Secularism.
Comparison:
In the midst of confusion, if one
compares the argument of both
Islamic and Secular idealists, and
understands both concepts, the
pathway to reality becomes quite
clear. The secular argument focuses
more on the personality and
appearance of Quaid e Azam. If their
argument is probed, the most
significant point is the following
quote of Quaid e Azam:
‘’ You may belong to any religion or
caste or creed, that has nothing to do
with the business of the state”
There is also one more speech of
Quaid e Azam in which he talks
about Hindus seizing to be Hindus
and Muslims seizing to be Muslims,
but not in a religious sense, rather in
political sense. Other than these two
quotes, secularists focus on Quaid e
Azam’s personality. He was educated
in England, his English was much
better than Urdu, he wore an English
suit, and things as such.
Quaid e Azam’s Western appearence
But it is to be noted, that Allama
Iqbal, the greatest Pan-‐Islamic
philosopher of the same time was
educated in the West, he spoke
exceptionally fluent English, he
usually wore western suits as well,
but at the same time he called for the
rule of the Quran. So it would not be
analytically convincing to label
17
Quaid e Azam secular because of his
appearance or seeming way of living.
Some Pakistani liberals even go to
the extent of saying that Quaid e
Azam created Pakistan so that his
party could get seats in a parliament,
or Quaid e Azam never wanted
Pakistan, it was rather a mistake of
the situation. It would be extremely
offensive to the five million Muslims
who gave their lives for Pakistan,
when we say that Pakistan and the
two-‐nation theory is not valid
anymore.
Even if one does not agree with the
pro-‐Islamic argument and focuses
on unbiased research, it is counted,
specifically according to the research
of Mr. Ayub Baig Mirza, that Quaid e
Azam gave 115 speeches in which he
perceived Pakistan as an Islamic
State; out of which, 101 are prior to
independence and 14 are post-‐
independence. In many other
addresses, Quaid e Azam clarified
that every movement has an
ideological foundation and its
visionary, and for Pakistan’s
movement, Islam is the ideology and
Allama Iqbal is the visionary. Pro-‐
Islamic analysts have also
concluded, that Quaid e Azam’s
speech of 11th August, which is
widely rejoiced by secularists, was
actually given by him to reassure
Non-‐Muslim Pakistanis of their
rights and place in the society, and it
did not mean to label Pakistan as a
secular nation. The famous excerpt
from 11th August address is as
follows:
“We are all citizens and equal citizens of one state…. Now I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal, and you will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the State”. After this speech was given,
secularists spread the word that
Quaid e Azam wants Pakistan to be a
18
secular state. Factually, since then all
of this confusion had started. But to
clarify the matter, Quaid e Azam
himself said on 25th January 1948
that
“I could not understand the section
of the people that deliberately
wanted to spread mischief and
propaganda that the constitution of
Pakistan would not be made on the
basis of Shariah”.
Quaid e Azam offering prayers
This quote folds and dumps the
confusion in the bin. Pro-‐Islamic
writers and columnists have debated
that Quaid e Azam’s speech of 11th
August was actually meant to relieve
the anxiety of the minorities residing
in Pakistan caused by the religious
conflicts in the sub-‐continent. It was
not meant to describe the system
that was to be implemented in
Pakistan, and this is ascertained by
the speech of Quaid e Azam in 25th
January 1948, in which he clarifies
what system Pakistan will run on.
There is a copious amount of quotes
of Quaid e Azam that elucidate the
fact that Pakistan was created for
Muslims to live their life in
accordance to Islamic principles,
morals and ethics. Not only this, but
also create their own system of
governance, in the light of Quran, so
that the world has something
different to follow other than the
systems of the West, which have
ruined the economic circumstances
of the world (as clarified by Quaid e
Azam in his last speech). During his
address to the Usmania University,
Deccan India, Quaid e Azam was
asked what an “Islamic” republic is.
He defined it in the following terms:
“In Islam, ultimate obedience belongs to God alone. The only way to follow this guidance is through
19
the Holy Quran. Islam does not preach obedience to a king, parliament, person or institution. The Islamic Govt. means rule of the Quran. And how can you establish the rule of the Quran without an independent state?” Quaid-e-Azam, address to the students of the Usmania University, Deccan, India, August, 1941. Two things that are illuminated by
this answer would either anger the
secular elements of Pakistan, or
convince them to accept Pakistan as
an Islamic state. One, that this quote
reflects the fact that Quaid e Azam,
at an individual level, was neither
secular minded, nor unaware of
Islamic teachings.
Quaid e Azam
His description of an Islamic state is
no different than what any Islamic
scholar would perceive it to be, and
his knowledge upon it shows that
Quaid e Azam was actually a
knowledgeable Muslim, if not a saint.
And the second message given by
this quote, through the last sentence,
teaches exactly why Pakistan was
really created. “How can you
establish the rule of Quran without
an independent state?”. The Great
Leader, as “Quaid e Azam” would be
translated to in English, wanted the
rule of Quran to be established in
Pakistan; and through this it
becomes lucid that the struggle for
Pakistan is still an abandoned
mission, which can only be
completed after the laws of Quran
and Sunnah are implemented.
Rather surprising is the fact that
some groups find it odd when Quran
being implemented in Pakistan is
talked about, whereas (as mentioned
before on page 10) The Objectives
Resolution, the foundation of
20
Pakistan’s constitution, states that
no law will be enforced that
contradicts to the teachings of
Quran.
Plenty of other speeches of Quaid e
Azam indicate towards an Islamic
system. A few of them are as follows,
“ Pakistan not only means freedom and independence, but also the Muslim Ideology that has to be preserved that has come to us as a precious gift and treasure.” Quaid-e-Azam, Chittagong, March, 1948. “Come forward as servants of Islam, organize the people economically, socially, educationally and politically and I am sure that you will be a power that will be accepted by everybody.” Quaid-e-Azam, Presidential Address at the All India Muslim League, Lahore March 23, 1940. “You have to stand guard over the development and maintenance of Islamic democracy, Islamic social justice and the equality of manhood in your own native soil. With faith, discipline and selfless devotion to duty, there is nothing worthwhile that you cannot achieve.” Quaid-e-Azam, address to the officers and men of the 5th Heavy and 6th Light Regiments in Malir, Karachi, February 21, 1948. “You are only voicing my sentiments, and the sentiments of millions of Musalmans (Muslims) when you say that Pakistan should be based on pure foundations of social justice
and Islamic Socialism, not other –isms” Quaid e Azam, March 1948, Chittagong. “We should have a State in which we could live and breathe as free men and which we could develop according to our own lights and culture and where principles of Islamic social justice could find free play.” Quaid-e-Azam, address to Civil, Naval, Military and Air Force Officers of Pakistan Government, Karachi, October 11, 1947. These quotes give an idea about the
thought process of Quaid e Azam
while leading the independence
movement, and also confirm that the
destined state ideology of Pakistan
was always meant to be Islam. In
actuality, Quaid e Azam himself
called people who support
secularism in Pakistan “mischievous
and propagandists” (referring to his
address on 25th January 1948).
Another argument that is presented
by the liberal analysts of Pakistan is
that Allama Iqbal had absolutely no
role in the creation of Pakistan,
mainly because he died before the
passing of Pakistan Resolution, also
21
known as Lahore Resolution. This
again, is an insult to history. Keeping
aside the fact that almost every
Pakistani recognizes Iqbal’s vital
role in the creation of Pakistan, it is
still necessary to clear the mystery.
After the Pakistan Resolution was
passed and was presented in Minto
Park, Quaid e Azam visited Allama
Iqbal’s shrine with one of the
members of the Pakistan movement,
and stated that if Iqbal was here, he
would be very happy to see that I
have done what was ordained to me.
Allama Iqbal with Muslim leaders
This highlights the importance of
Allama Iqbal in the creation of
Pakistan. Also, as pointed out on
page 17, Quaid e Azam had called
Iqbal the visionary behind the
movement for Pakistan. The greatest
reason, why some people don’t like
it when Iqbal is associated with the
creation of Pakistan, is that Iqbal
was a Pan-‐Islamist. This is not only
portrayed through his extraordinary
poetic dimension, but also in his
written letters to Quaid e Azam
regarding Pakistan. Some of the
letters include,
“The Congress President has denied the political existence of Muslims in no unmistakable terms. The other Hindu political body, i.e., the Mahasabha, whom I regard as the real representative of the masses of the Hindus, has declared more than once that a united Hindu-‐Muslim nation is impossible in India. In these circumstances it is obvious that the only way to a peaceful India is redistribution of the country on the lines of racial, religious and linguistic affinities.” Iqbal to Quaid, June 1937. “To my mind the new constitution with its ides of a single Indian federation is completely hopeless. A separate federation of Muslim provinces reformed on the lines I have suggested above, is the only course by which we can secure a peaceful India and save Muslims from the domination of non-‐
22
Muslims. Why should not the Muslims of North-‐West India and Bengal be considered as nation entitled to Self-‐determination just as other nation as in India and outside India are?” Iqbal to Quaid, June 1937. “Happily there is a solution in the enforcement of the Law of Islam and its further development in the light of modern ideas. After a long and careful study of Islamic Law I have come to the conclusion that if this system of Law is properly understood and applied, at last the right to subsistence is secured to everybody. But the enforcement and development of the Shariat of Islam is impossible in this country without a free Muslim state or states.” Iqbal’s letter to Quaid, 28th May, 1937. “The Palestine question is very much agitating the minds of the Muslims. I have no doubt that the League will pass a strong resolution on this question and also by holding a private conference of the leaders. Personally I would not mind going to jail on an issue which affects both Islam and India. The formation of a Western base on the very gates of the East is a menace to both.” Iqbal to Quaid, 1937. Not only do the letters reveal Allama
Iqbal’s Pan-‐Islamism, they also
uncover the fact that Allama Iqbal
had a critical role in forming the
vision, strategy, purpose and
motivation for the Muslim League,
and the Muslims of India at large for
the mission of Pakistan. We can see
in the last letter mentioned above,
that Pakistan’s foreign policy
towards Palestine and Israel is the
product of it. Quaid e Azam, before
the Pakistan resolution passed,
declared numerous times that the
Muslims of India did not honor
Britain’s pro Jewish attitude and its
betrayal towards the Arabs.
Quaid e Azam with Global Muslim leaders Quaid e Azam also declared that the
Muslims, not only of India but also of
all the world will rise in rage against
the state of Israel and will perceive
Britain as an enemy of Islam. He
even went to the extent to call Israel
23
and “illegal child of the West”. It
should be noted here that this is not
some fiery lecturer, this is Quaid e
Azam himself. The support for the
Palestinian cause was built in
Pakistanis through this letter of
Iqbal, which described Pakistan’s
foreign policy, even before its
resolution was passed. This shows
just a little image of what the
importance of Iqbal was in the
creation of Pakistan, and it is not to
be neglected that the creation of
Pakistan was only one big step that
had to be achieved; the real
completion of this mission would be
the implementation of Quran, as
ordered by Quaid e Azam and
Allama Iqbal themselves.
How can Islam help Pakistan
today?
When Quaid e Azam, and the
hundreds of millions of Muslims in
the Sub Continent called for an
“Islamic” state of Pakistan, they did
not mean “Mullahism” (which is
usually what the West perceives an
Islamic system to be). Quaid e Azam
described this case very well when
he stated during his address to a US
radio station that Pakistan will not
be a theocracy (ruled by priests).
The aim was to implement the real
essence of Islam, and the wisdom of
Quran and Sunnah, through which
Pakistan would grow as an Islamic
welfare state and serve humanity.
According to Mr. Haji Mohammad
Saif Ullah Khan, ex federal minister
and leader of opposition National
Assembly Pakistan, if The Objectives
Resolution were enforced
appropriately and thoroughly,
Pakistan would not have been in this
situation, where feudal and capitalist
lords are ruling it. The rich are
getting richer and the poor is getting
poorer. Mr. Saif Ullah Khan also
blamed corrupt leaders that have
polluted Pakistan’s politics
24
throughout its history, and advised
to practically implement The
Objectives Resolution to create the
real Islamic Pakistan as demanded
by the Muslims of Sub Continent
under the leadership of Quaid e
Azam. He believes that Islam can
help the situation in Pakistan today,
because its creation was based on
the name of Islam. It is noticeable
that the majority of the Pakistani
people are conservative minded, not
in an extremist sense, but in a moral
sense. Any event, whether on the
global level or inside Pakistan, which
involves blasphemy or ignorance
towards Muslims, is protested the
most in Pakistan.
Pakistanis protesting against Israel
Whether it is about the offensive
festival of drawing the Prophet
(peace be upon him) or burning the
Holy Quran, Pakistani Muslims are
always seen in the front row
demanding a halt to the profane acts.
These people have witnessed and
tried every system of the time;
dictatorship, democracy, socialism,
and if one analyzes bluntly, each one
of them has failed to satisfy the
Pakistani public. None of them have
provided social justice and none of
them have fulfilled the requirements
that the forefathers had set. Today,
Pakistan is practically neither an
Islamic state, nor a secular state. It is
rather a feudal state, which is being
ruled by landlords and corrupt
capitalists sitting in power to gain
more and more for themselves.
Similarly, Ms. Syeda Qudsia
Mashhadi has explained that Islam is
not only the solution for Pakistan; it
is the solution for the whole world.
25
She supports this statement with the
quote of Quaid e Azam (page 20) in
which he states that Pakistan does
not need any other isms, it just
needs the Islamic system of
governance. She also mentioned
Islamic caliphate, and explicated that
an Islamic caliphate or a modern
model based on it would be a good
solution for the problems in
Pakistan.
If we look at Muslim history, only
one social and economical system
has worked for Muslims, and that is
the rule of the Quran, or as it is
called, Shariah. Even though the
political system has been modified
over the years and Muslims have
seen a lot of monarchies, the social
environment and economy of the
Muslim civilizations have only been
stable with the fundamental
principles of Islam. And it is evident
that all the problems that not only
Pakistanis, but Muslims at large are
facing today are because they have
not focused on creating their own
systems of governance, but rather
borrowed systems from the West
and East which in the end weakened
the unity and strength of the
Muslims in most aspects of global
competition. Therefore, as Quaid e
Azam said in his last speech (page
11), Pakistanis must create their
own destiny, and come up with new
and revolutionary systems of
governance, military, economy and
social justice in the light of the Holy
Quran. Islam is a religion where
sovereignty and supremacy belongs
to Allah alone, not any dictator or
parliament. Islam endows love to
humanity and respect to all religions
and equal rights for minorities as for
Muslims. This was the message of
the forefathers of Pakistan, and now
is the duty of its youth. Not only will
this require will and determination,
but also knowledge and loyalty to
26
the religion for which they will have
to reject other incompetent systems
of the world, and from which the
Pakistanis will take guidance to
create new systems of equality and
justice.
Conclusion:
Playing with history and altering its
course for one’s personal favor can
lead to centuries of humiliation for
the nation. A small compromise can
lead to years of slavery, and a
dignified stand at the right time can
welcome prosperity. Pakistanis must
realize that it would be cruel to
Quaid e Azam himself, if we perceive
that knowledgeable Muslim as a
secular leader who only created
Pakistan and martyred 5 million
people so that his party can get a
parliament to lead.
Pakistan has not been able to
achieve its potential and its purpose
because it has forgotten Allama
Iqbal. Pakistanis have forgotten why
they created this nation, and what
price they had to pay for it. It would
be brutal to forget the cost that the
forefathers of this nation paid to
create it, and Pakistanis must now
look forward to generating new
systems of social justice, uniting the
Muslim world and serving humanity
in the light of Quran, as ordained by
Quaid e Azam and Allama Iqbal.
Liaquat Ali Khan, first Prime-minister of Pakistan, who passed The Objectives Resolution
Bibliography (references):
Internet:
1. Daily Ausaf Leading News Resource of Pakistan. Web. 05 Oct. 2011.
<http://www.dailyausaf.com/edi_detail.php?id=4767>.
2. Believer, By. "A Glimpse of Quaid’s Vision for Pakistan | Madina-‐e-‐Sani."
Madina-e-Sani | میر٠�عرب Ú©Ùˆ آئی Ù¹Ú¾Ù†ÚˆÛŒ Û �وا
Ø¬Û �اں سے. Web. 21 Sept. 2011.
<http://madinaesani.wordpress.com/2011/09/02/a-‐glimpse-‐of-‐quaids-‐
vision-‐for-‐pakistan/>.
3. "Jinnah (r.a) the Saint -‐ Fascinating Spiritual Dimension of Quaid-‐e-‐Azam's
Life." Scribd. Web. 21 Sept. 2011.
<http://www.scribd.com/doc/64596606/Jinnah-‐r-‐a-‐the-‐Saint-‐
Fascinating-‐Spiritual-‐Dimension-‐of-‐Quaid-‐e-‐Azam-‐s-‐Life>.
4. "میرا قائدˉ،اسلام کا س٠�یر۔ متین
خالدˉ « اردˉÙˆ Û�Û’ جس کا نام." WordPress.com — Get
a Free Blog Here. Web. 06 Oct. 2011. <http://wp.me/p1srQL-‐8u>.
5. Mashhadi., Syeda Qudsia. "From Jinnah to Pakistan – A Will | Madina-‐e-‐
Sani." Madina-e-Sani ’. Web. 06 Oct. 2011.
<http://madinaesani.wordpress.com/2011/07/24/from-‐jinnah-‐to-‐
pakistan-‐a-‐will/>.
6. "A Rare Letter of Jinnah Shows the Importance of Iqbal’s Poetry | Madina-‐
e-‐Sani." Madina-e-Sani. Web. 06 Oct. 2011.
28
<http://madinaesani.wordpress.com/2011/07/06/a-‐rare-‐letter-‐of-‐
jinnah-‐shows-‐the-‐importance-‐of-‐iqbals-‐poetry/>.
7. "Pakistan or Martyrdom." WordPress.com — Get a Free Blog Here.
Professor Doctor Inam UlHaq Kausar. Web. 06 Oct. 2011.
<http://wp.me/p1srQL-‐7s>.
8. "Zarb E Kaleem Wa Parcham E Sitara O Hilal -‐ YouTube." YouTube -
Broadcast Yourself. Web. 06 Oct. 2011.
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEYHzbjwOBc>.
9. "Jinnah The Movie -‐ YouTube." YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Web. 06 Oct.
2011. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dUz-‐rhYd4s>.
10. "Shahid Nama -‐ Zaid Hamid Talks With Dr Shahid Masood -‐ 25 Aug 2011 -‐
Part 2/3 -‐ YouTube." YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Web. 06 Oct. 2011.
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drhgIBzAy9c>.
11. "From Jinnah to Pakistan -‐ YouTube." YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Web.
06 Oct. 2011. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf5wtdIVvJY>.
12. "Zia Ul Haq Islami Nizam in Pakistan -‐ YouTube." YouTube - Broadcast
Yourself. Web. 06 Oct. 2011.
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne765z0v8YY>.
13. "Lahore Resolution and Pakistan Day -‐ Takmeel-‐e-‐Pakistan -‐ YouTube."
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Web. 09 Oct. 2011.
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JMKLQoLA5k>.
14. "A Martyrs Prayer -‐ YouTube." YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Web. 09 Oct.
2011. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTp4cf5iidc>.
15. "Identity Pakistan -‐ YouTube." YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Web. 09 Oct.
2011. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6X8SXGLFQfo>.
29
16. Siddiqi, Shahid R. "Insurgency Movements in India | Opinion Maker."
Opinion Maker - Foresight With Insight! Web. 21 Oct. 2011.
<http://www.opinion-‐maker.org/2010/12/insurgency-‐movements-‐in-‐
india/>.
17. "Pakistan Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860)." Welcome to Pakistani.org. Web.
21 Oct. 2011.
<http://www.pakistani.org/pakistan/legislation/1860/actXLVof1860.ht
ml>.
18. "Spiritual Pakistan – Past, Present and Future « Spiritual Pakistan."
Spiritual Pakistan. Web. 21 Oct. 2011.
<http://spiritualpakistan.wordpress.com/2011/09/22/spiritual-‐
pakistan-‐past-‐present-‐and-‐future/>.
19. "Saheeen's Channel -‐ YouTube." YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Web. 02
Nov. 2011.
<http://www.youtube.com/user/Saheeen?feature=grec_index>.
20. "PAKISTAN REVOLUTION-‐TAKMEEL E PAKISTAN (PAKISTAN
RESOLUTION 23RD MARCH 2010) -‐ YouTube." YouTube - Broadcast
Yourself. Web. 02 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13k6aTWnoJA>.
21. "Objectives Resolution Is Passed [1949]." The Most Comprehensive
Reference on the Political History of Pakistan. Web. 04 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.storyofpakistan.com/articletext.asp?artid=A054>.
22. "Ayub Khan; Remembrance 1965 Address [Subtitle (Eng)] -‐ YouTube."
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Web. 04 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE9IkzOsJvw>.
30
23. Mirza, Ayub Baig. "Quaid E Azam's Speech of 11th August-‐ True or False?"
Preserve Urdu- Wordpress. Www.wordpress.com. Web.
<http://preserveurdu.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/١۱١۱‐-�ک�ی‐-�ق�ا�ئ�دِ�ا�ع�ظ�م-‐
.</�ہ�ے‐-�ک�ی�ا‐-�س�چ‐-DB%94%�ت�ق�ر�ی�ر‐-�ک�ی‐-�ا�گ�س�ت
Books:
1. Shahab, Qudratullah. Shahabnama. Lahore: Sang E Mil, 1987. Print.
2. Ahmad, Mian Noor. Noor E Baseerat Kalaam E Iqbal Ki Roshni Mai. Print.
3. Mufti, Mumtaz. Alakh Nagri. Print.
4. Wasif, Ali Wasif. Guftugoo. Print.
Interviews:
1. Hamid, Syed Zaid. "Interview-‐ Is Pakistan Destined to Be Islamic or
Secular?" E-‐mail interview. 06 Oct. 2011.
2. Mashhadi, Syeda Qudsia, “Interview-‐ Is Pakistan Destined to Be Islamic or
Secular?” E-‐mail interview. 06 Oct. 2011.
3. Saif Ullah Khan, Haji Mohammad. "Can Islam Help Pakistan Today?" E-‐
mail interview. 19 Oct. 2011.