Completely rewritten ver. 5, after the biased reviewer claiming: that the time of electrons speed (actually few mm/s) to reach from the switch to fuse (actually the time of electrons is several hours or days months or years, depending of the length of t the circuit total length of the loop), what matters is the time of propagation of the field which of the of 250,000 Km/s, if the signal is send by E/W waves, this speed is c, the velocity light, which is invariant under the Lorentz transformations, actually the initial goal of the transformations, which the reviewer refers to, as a must, but obviously has no idea of the said purpose-goal. Therefore the reviewer has an ignorance and confusion in reference to to review such an article. RELATIVISTIC OBSERVERS DANGEROUS ILLUSIONS AND SEVERAL DANGEROUS CONTRADICTIONS. P.T. Pappasa, T.P. Pappasb, L.P. Pappasc.appappas@papimi.com, btpappas@papimi.gr, clpappas@papimi.gr.Abstract:In this paper, it is shown for different observers based on different orientation, different events happen, dangerous illusions. Special Relativity creates unaccepted paradoxes-contradictions, via elementary standard calculations. These paradoxes-contradictions may have unpredictable dangerous consequences in major applications, for example those of CERN. To the extend, if cosmos-creation incorporated Special Relativity, would have never been created.CONSIDERATION:

Two clocks are connected to a common mechanism with an axis joining them. A stationary observer S1 notice identical times recorded on them. The common axis is oriented in the direction of the velocity u of a moving inertial frame S2. According to Special Relativity1,2,3 the moving inertial frame S2 notices two different times on the two clocks, and the common axis having been twisted another bizarre but known phenomenon6,7. Relevant remarks: However, we ignore this paradoxical situation as another small-negligible and irrelevant situation, as clocks could function in various different ways. The rotation could be inverted and/or magnified by one extra cog-wheel in the mechanism of the clocks or of one clock. The clocks could show time by the turning clock-wise as normal clocks turn cw or counter-clock-wise ccw the normal clock rotate i.e. the opposite direction the normal clocks rotate. Clocks could be in pairs, one registering the time turning cw, and the other ccw. Then which way will the bar twist? For both ways, one clock will contract time, and the other the opposite i.e. will dilate time. A 100% clear contradiction paradox of S.R. for the fast-moving observer S2 and the previous reviewers suggested relevant references 5 and 6!

Another inertial moving observer S3, Fig. 1, and with velocity v but perpendicularly to the axis of the clocks in S1, sees identical times for the two clocks and no twist of the axis. If the clocks are located on the rotating Earth, then the clocks should appear to jump back and forth according to the orientation of the Earth relative to the fast moving alternatively observers S2 and S3, causing one illusion to one of the observers each time, successively. This a previously unheard, bizarre and paradoxical phenomenon that may cause successive explosions or not to one of the S2 and S3, each time according to the orientation of the rotating Earth.Fig. 1. Clocks with a common axis connected to a central clock mechanism. Time difference for observer S2 for the two clocks: t2=(t1-x1u/c2), t2= -x1u/c2, for t1=0. Resulting to a new phenomenon: the twisting common axis for observer S2, only. Fig. 2.The two clocks are slave controlled symmetrically by a central transmitting radio waves station.Fig. 3.The two clocks are connected in a circuit with a battery and explosive packet of dynamites, via two switches on the clocks each, in such a way to close electrically the circuit Fig. 4 and 5. When both clocks indicate 12 oclock and cause a strong explosion. Observer S2 never observes both clocks showing simultaneously 12 oclock and never sees the explosion. However, observers, S1 and S3 see the explosion.Therefore, Observers S1, S2 and S3 are not equivalent, despite Special Relativity claims. Therefore, this is an unaccepted paradox-contradiction of Special Relativity, causing different illusions to equivalent assumed observers.This illusion also depends on how observer S2 calculates his results. Assume he firstly observes the contracted lengths: x1/(u) = x2/(u), because they were initially equally long: x1 = x2 when stationary. Observer S2 observes that light covers two opposite and equal moving distances at speed u, at the same time t, He observes the light signal arrives at times t + t1 and t t2, the moment t, the source emits the light. Now the same school boys-observers of S2 and with a different legitimated calculation using the school formula as an internal normal formula of the S2 inertial frame, with exclusive use only for it: legitimate school boy formula: elapsed time = actual covered distance/velocity, (1)That Einstein2 did not exempt (1) from his theory of Special Relativity. Neither, today literature2 does so. (1) is actually, equivalent to the standard definition of velocities in the whole of Physics.Some observers conclude that both clocks register different times and consequently and dangerously, they also do not notice the explosion.Calculation of the two clock time deviations t1 and t2, Fig. 2: t2= [x2/(u) + t2u]/c and t1=[ x1/(u) - t1u]/c: ct2 ut2 = x2/(u): t2 = [x2/(u)]/(c-u) (2), and t1 = [x1/(u)/(c+u): (3), the two clocks of S1 registered the clock time deviations (3) and (2) for S2, other than the predictions of Lorentz transformations2 for S2: t1= -(u)x1u/c2 and t2= (u)x2u/c2, respectively, - two contradictions for legitimate school boy direct calculations, using formula (1) and Lorentz transformations2 !

Fig. 4.Observer S2 does not see an explosion. Because according to him, the two clocks have a time difference, and the two switches are not both closed to establish the circuit: t2=(t1-x1u/c2)=-x1u/c2, (1).For t1=0. See Fig. 2.

Fig. 5.Observers S1 and S3 see an explosion. But not S2.

Let us consider that the left system S2 sees the x1 optically contracted according to Lorentz of course, and in the meantime moves with velocity u: Let t is the time difference seeing the two ends of it.t = (x1/-tu)/c = x1/c -tu/c:t(1+u/c) = x1/c:t = x1/c(1+u/c) =x1/(c+u): so there is a delay, due to seeing simultaneously by receiving from both ends ofx1, signals at time difference: t=x1/(c+u) (2)So, the above result is also another contradiction to Lorentz transformation result (1) which is: t =-x1u/c2, different than the result (2).Suppose now, the two clocks in system S1, are connected by two symmetrical light signals, sending simultaneously ticks from the central oscillator mechanism. For all inertial observers the rate (frequency) of the clocks should be the same. For they should receive signals at the same rate, as each actually should see the central mechanism kicking rate, as it is the practice for the countries with one time-zone of the planet earth or the worldwide astronomy observatory clocks indicating the Universal Greenwich time that is broadcasted by a central station from Greenwich, London, U.K.So now the two clocks possibly display different times, but at identical flow time rate that corresponds to the central oscillator relative to each observer. The two clocks will show identical times each for all the observers. However, if we set next to each clock an independent self-working clock, then the independent clocks will show the same or different times, according to the Observer of either S1, S2, S3. So according to relativity, time of clocks depends on whether they are a slave (as the clocks of one-time zone countries are slaves of time broadcasting station) to an oscillator. When two clocks display the same time, particularly when they are digital displaying digits and not analogs clocks. All observers of Special Relativity might differ in reading correspondingly time among themselves, corresponding on the velocity and distance delay of the master clock transmission station to local clocks.

CONCLUSION:According to Special Relativity, inertial observers based on their velocity and their orientation, are not equivalent and different things-illusions happen or do not happen, such as a dangerous nuclear or a strong explosion may happen for them or not. Also, time of clocks may depend on the actual mechanism of clocks, producing unacceptable bizarre phenomena-various paradoxes and also making unacceptable, bizarre, dangerous the theory of Special Relativity itself, which predicts a virtual reality for its inertial observers, depending on the way the observer performs his legitimate calculations, as in the above different contradicting results. The equivalence of all inertial observers for Special Relativity is invalidated by the same theory, as well as, destroying the isotropy of physics for flat space4,5. Our society is exposed to unpredictable danger, depending how calculations are made in its critical nuclear centers, as in fact in such centers has already happened a seriously unpredictable accident today, Chernobyl, Fukushima.

Our cosmos creation, incorporating the dangerous and schizophrenic theory of Special Relativity regulating time in its relativistic way, would have been arbitrary and also schizophrenic, and would have never happened or completed the purpose of creation.

Finally, the critic of Special Relativity becomes a funny story with all the bizarre and paradoxical illusions.

The great scientist Galileo Galilei was whispering EPPUR SI MUOVE, while the non-scientist inquisition was censoring him and willing to pass on to him the ultimate judgment. This event is continuously repeated until today, not by an inquisition, but now, by science and scientist themselves, who shout S.R. is our holy cow. As a confirmation or not: let's see whether reviewers scientists will reject this document and on what scientific arguments, or they will not reject it.

REFERENCES:1. A. Einstein, ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF THE MOVING BODIES, 1905, http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/, 2. Google search: direct Lorentz transformations, inverse Lorentz transformation: particular: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-get-inverse-lorentz-tranformation-from-direct-lorentz-transformation.188338/. 3. Also: http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node110.html.

4. Google search: Isotropy of physics for flat space isotropy of physics for flat space.5. International Journal of TheoreticalPhysics. 1973, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 259.6. http://postimg.org/image/8gdx0j3gd/7. Wolfgang Rindler "Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological" (second edition), (ISBN 0198567316) page 74, problem 3.7.