parcc results€¦ · 25.00%. 35.00%. 45.00%. 55.00%. 65.00%. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 3rd. 4th....

PARCC Results:Spring 2018

Administrations

West Milford TownshipOctober 3, 2018

Measuring College and Career Readiness

1

2

FOUR YEAR PARCC DATA – ELA% OF STUDENTS SCORING 4 OR 5

3

FOUR YEAR PARCC DATA – ELA% OF STUDENTS SCORING 4 OR 5

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

50.00%

55.00%

60.00%

65.00%

2015 2016 2017 2018

3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th

Math 2015 2016 2017 2018 Change

3rd 51.8 58.3 56.9 60.4 +8.6%

4th 35.3 52.3 49.0 49.6 +14.3%

5th 29.2 45.7 47.3 44.8 +15.6%

6th 40.8 42.0 41.4 41.5 +0.7%

7th 24.2 28.7 31.7 34.1 +9.9%

8th 9.8 17.6 14.8 20.8 +11.0%

Alg. I 25.1 29.1 23.5 31.0 +5.9%

Geom. 15.3 21.3 14.4 16.2 +0.9

Alg. II 24.2 22.4 30.4 20.8 -3.4%

4

FOUR YEAR PARCC DATA – MATH% OF STUDENTS SCORING 4 OR 5

5

FOUR YEAR PARCC DATA – MATH% OF STUDENTS SCORING 4 OR 5

5.00%

15.00%

25.00%

35.00%

45.00%

55.00%

65.00%

2015 2016 2017 2018

3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th Alg I Geom Alg II

Comparison of West Mi l ford’s 2015 – 2018PARCC Administrat ions

Engl ish Language Arts - Percentages

Grade Level 1 2015

Level 1 2018

Level 2 2015

Level 22018

Level 42015

Level 42018

Level 52015

Level 52018

Change in Level 1 and 2 2015 to 2018

Change in Level 4 and 5

2015 to 2018**

3 6.7 3.5 14.3 12.4 47.3 52.7 3.6 6.6 -5.1 +8.4

4 6.8 3.6 13.7 8.7 39.0 47.6 9.8 15.5 -8.2 +14.3

5 3.9 6.9 15.7 9.0 47.5 50.2 0.5 4.9 -3.7 +7.1

6 5.2 5.2 8.8 9.3 54.1 48.8 4.1 6.9 +0.5 -2.5

7 13.5 5.2 19.7 12.7 32.0 39.7 6.2 18.3 -15.3 +19.8

8 11.9 4.0 15.5 9.3 39.9 41.7 9.3 18.2 -14.1 +10.7

9 22.5 6.8 26.5 16.1 26.5 36.5 7.9 10.4 -26.1 +12.5

10 42.5 18.5 20.4 17.3 20.4 31.7 3.5 10.3 -27.1 +18.1

11* 17.3 30.7 16.3 14.9 37.8 26.0 10.2 3.3 +12.0 -18.7*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.- The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year. 6

Comparison of West Mi l ford’s Economical ly D isadvantaged2015 – 2018

PARCC Administrat ionsEngl ish Language Arts - Percentages

Grade Level 1 2015

Level 1 2018

Level 2 2015

Level 22018

Level 42015

Level 42018

Level 52015

Level 52018



2015 to 2018**

E. D. Grade 3 16.7 8.1 33.3 13.5 27.8 48.6 0.0 0.0 -28.4 +20.8

E. D. Grade 4 16.2 0.0 16.2 12.8 29.7 51.3 10.8 7.7 -19.6 +18.5

E. D. Grade 5 7.7 15.0 30.8 12.5 30.8 32.5 0.0 5.0 -11.0 +6.7

E. D. Grade 6 17.2 15.4 3.4 11.5 31.0 26.9 0.0 7.7 +6.3 +3.6

E. D. Grade 7 22.7 8.3 18.2 22.9 27.3 20.8 4.5 18.8 -9.7 +7.8

E. D. Grade 8 16.7 8.8 27.8 20.6 22.2 29.4 5.6 5.9 -15.1 +7.5

E. D. Grade 9 42.1 9.1 26.3 21.2 10.5 18.2 5.3 6.1 -38.1 +8.5

E. D. Grade 10 72.7 24.3 18.2 18.9 0.0 18.9 0.0 5.4 -47.7 +24.3

E. D. Grade 11* 30.0 42.4 10.0 15.2 20.0 12.1 20.0 3.0 +17.6 -24.9*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.- The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year. 7

Comparison of West Mi l ford’s Students with Disabi l i t ies2015 – 2018

PARCC Administrat ionsEngl ish Language Arts - Percentages

Grade Level 1 2015

Level 1 2018

Level 2 2015

Level 22018

Level 42015

Level 42018

Level 52015

Level 52018



2015 to 2018**

S.W.D. Grade 3 26.7 12.2 26.7 36.6 22.2 26.8 0.0 0.0 -4.6 +4.6S.W.D.

Grade 4 22.0 15.7 24.0 19.6 20.0 23.5 4.0 3.9 -10.7 +3.4S.W.D.

Grade 5 11.8 25.8 44.1 25.8 17.6 16.7 0.0 0.0 -4.3 -0.9S.W.D.

Grade 6 20.0 18.2 24.0 25.5 26.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 -0.3 -6.0S.W.D.

Grade 7 41.2 18.0 26.5 24.0 8.8 12.0 0.0 2.0 -25.6 +5.2S.W.D.

Grade 8 29.7 19.1 35.1 40.4 10.8 2.1 0.0 0.0 -5.3 -38.3S.W.D.

Grade 9 48.5 23.5 27.3 41.2 6.1 7.8 3.0 2.0 -11.1 +0.7S.W.D.

Grade 10 76.2 46.2 14.3 19.2 0.0 15.4 0.0 0.0 -25.1 +15.4S.W.D.

Grade 11* 30.0 63.6 30.0 12.7 25.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 +16.3 -19.5*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.- The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year. 8

Comparison of West Mi l ford’s 2015 – 2018PARCC Administrat ions

Mathematics - Percentages

Grade Level 1 2015

Level 1 2018

Level 2 2015

Level 22018

Level 42015

Level 42018

Level 52015

Level 52018



2015 to 2018**

3 3.1 1.3 15.2 11.9 47.8 49.8 4.0 10.6 -5.1 +8.6

4 3.9 4.7 28.4 15.7 32.4 45.3 2.9 4.3 -11.9 +14.3

5 4.0 6.1 25.2 18.0 28.2 42.4 1.0 2.4 -5.1 +15.6

6 5.2 3.6 17.0 18.5 38.7 39.1 2.1 2.4 -0.1 +0.7

7 11.2 6.0 25.8 17.9 23.6 31.7 0.6 2.4 -13.1 +9.9

8* 24.2 18.2 32.6 22.4 9.8 20.3 0.0 0.5 -16.2 +11.0

ALG I 16.6 8.3 27.4 32.1 25.1 29.8 0.0 1.2 -3.6 +5.9

GEO 18.9 11.9 45.0 43.1 15.3 15.4 0.0 0.8 -8.9 +0.9

ALG II 21.2 26.6 19.7 25.9 22.7 20.1 1.5 0.7 +11.6 -3.4*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

9

Comparison of West Mi l ford’s Economical ly D isadvantaged2015 – 2018

PARCC Administrat ionsMathematics - Percentages

Grade Level 1 2015

Level 1 2018

Level 2 2015

Level 22018

Level 42015

Level 42018

Level 52015

Level 52018



2015 to 2018**

E. D. Grade 3 5.6 0.0 44.4 21.6 22.2 45.9 11.1 5.4 -28.4 +18.0

E. D. Grade 4 8.1 7.7 35.1 25.6 24.3 28.2 2.7 2.6 -9.9 +3.8

E. D. Grade 5 7.7 12.5 53.8 22.5 11.5 32.5 0.0 5.0 -26.5 +26.0

E. D. Grade 6 20.7 7.7 27.6 34.6 6.9 15.4 0.0 0.0 -6.0 +8.5

E. D. Grade 7 13.6 10.4 40.9 25.0 13.6 14.6 0.0 4.2 -19.1 +5.2

E. D. Grade 8 25.0 31.0 31.3 31.0 12.5 6.9 0.0 0.0 5.7 -5.6

E. D. ALG 1 44.4 7.7 33.3 53.8 5.6 17.9 0.0 0.0 -16.2 +12.3E. D. GEO 33.3 9.7 50.0 67.7 8.3 3.2 0.0 0.0 -5.9 -5.1E. D. ALG 2 0.0 29.4 33.3 29.4 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 +25.5 +17.6

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.- The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year. 10

Comparison of West Mi l ford’s Students with Disabi l i t ies2015 – 2018

PARCC Administrat ionsMathematics - Percentages

Grade Level 1 2015

Level 1 2018

Level 2 2015

Level 22018

Level 42015

Level 42018

Level 52015

Level 52018



2015 to 2018**

S.W.D. Grade 3 11.1 7.3 37.8 24.4 28.9 34.1 0.0 2.4 -17.2 +7.6S.W.D.

Grade 4 12.2 19.6 55.1 29.4 20.4 21.6 2.0 2.0 -18.3 +1.2S.W.D.

Grade 5 0.0 18.2 58.8 39.4 11.8 13.6 0.0 1.5 -1.2 +3.3S.W.D.

Grade 6 17.6 14.5 33.3 50.9 15.7 10.9 2.0 0.0 +14.5 -6.8S.W.D.

Grade 7 41.2 24.0 26.5 40.0 8.8 4.0 0.0 0.0 -3.7 -4.8S.W.D.

Grade 8 52.8 55.3 36.1 31.9 5.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 -1.7 +0.8S.W.D. ALG I 34.8 21.7 34.8 63.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 +15.1 -4.3

S.W.D. GEO 33.3 28.1 60.0 54.7 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 -10.5 +1.6

S.W.D. ALG II 0.0 30.0 20.0 50.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 +60.0 +20.0

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.- The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year. 11

Number of Students Tested Spr ing 2015 & Spr ing 2018 PARCC Administrat ions

Engl ish Language Arts/L iteracy

Grade Students Tested 2015 Students Tested 2018 Difference between number of students tested in 2015 and 2018

3 224 226 +24 205 252 +475 204 245 +416 194 248 +547 178 252 +748 193 247 +549 151 249 +98

10 113 243 +13011* 98 215 +117

TOTAL 1560 2177 +617*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy.

12

Number of Students TestedSpr ing 2015 & Spr ing 2018 PARCC Administrat ions

Math em at ics

Grade Students Tested 2015 Students Tested 2018 Difference between number of students tested in 2015 and 2018

3 224 227 +34 204 254 +505 202 245 +436 194 248 +547 178 252 +74

8* 132 192 +60Algebra I 175 252 +77

Geometry 111 253 +142Algebra II 66 139 +73

TOTAL 1486 2062 +576*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.Notes: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics.

13

Comparison of West Mi l ford’s S p r in g 2018 PA RC C A d m in ist rat ion s

En g l i sh Lan gu age A rts /L i te racy to N ew J e rs eyPe rc entages fo r 2018

GradeLevel 1, District

Level 1, State

Level 2, District

Level 2, State

Level 3, District

Level 3, State

Level 4, District

Level 4, State

Level 5, District

Level 5, State

3 3.5 13.5 12.4 13.5 24.8 21.4 52.7 43.5 6.6 8.1

4 3.6 7.6 8.7 12.3 24.6 22.1 47.6 39.1 15.5 18.9

5 6.9 6.9 9.0 12.6 29.0 22.4 50.2 47.2 4.9 10.8

6 5.2 6.2 9.3 13.6 29.8 24.0 48.8 41.3 6.9 14.9

7 5.2 8.6 12.7 10.2 24.2 18.5 39.7 34.1 18.3 28.6

8 4.0 8.7 9.3 11.1 26.7 19.8 41.7 39.9 18.2 20.4

9 6.8 12.3 16.1 12.5 30.1 21.1 36.5 38.0 10.4 16.1

10 18.5 18.3 17.3 12.8 22.2 19.0 31.7 31.8 10.3 18.1

11* 30.7 23.1 14.9 16.6 25.1 22.2 26.0 29.1 3.3 9.0

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test.Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

14

Comparison of West Mi l ford’s S p r in g 2018 PA RC C A d m in ist rat ion s

Math em at ics to N ew J e rs ey Pe rc entages fo r 2018

Grade Level 1, District

Level 1, State

Level 2, District

Level 2, State

Level 3, District

Level 3, State

Level 4, District

Level 4, State

Level 5, District

Level 5, State

3 1.3 8.0 11.9 15.3 26.4 23.7 49.8 37.8 10.6 15.2

4 4.7 7.5 15.7 16.8 29.9 26.3 45.3 41.8 4.3 7.6

5 6.1 7.5 18.0 17.0 31.0 26.7 42.4 38.5 2.4 10.4

6 3.6 8.5 18.5 20.1 36.3 27.9 39.1 35.6 2.4 8.0

7 6.0 7.7 17.9 20.3 42.1 28.6 31.7 36.0 2.4 7.4

8* 18.2 22.0 22.4 22.7 38.5 27.1 20.3 27.2 0.5 1.0

Algebra I 8.3 11.3 32.1 18.6 28.6 24.3 29.8 39.3 1.2 6.5

Geometry 11.9 9.4 43.1 31.5 28.9 29.6 15.4 24.6 0.8 4.9

Algebra II 26.6 31.0 25.9 22.4 26.6 18.0 20.1 24.6 0.7 4.0

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

15

Comparison of Apshawa’sSpr ing 2018 Administrat ion

Engl ish Language Arts/L iteracy to West Mi l ford’s Percentages in 2018

Grade Level 1, School

Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

3 4.0 4.0 16.0 12.0 16.0 25.0 52.0 53.0 12.0 7.0

4 7.0 4.0 9.0 9.0 40.0 25.0 35.0 48.0 9.0 15.0

5 3.0 7.0 5.0 9.0 38.0 29.0 50.0 50.0 5.0 5.0

6 9.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 28.0 30.0 48.0 49.0 9.0 7.0


16

Comparison of Maple Road’sSpr ing 2018 Administrat ion



Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

3 0.0 4.0 17.0 12.0 46.0 25.0 37.0 53.0 0.0 7.0

4 8.0 4.0 3.0 9.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 48.0 14.0 15.0

5 3.0 7.0 0.0 9.0 24.0 29.0 62.0 50.0 10.0 5.0

6 3.0 5.0 8.0 9.0 14.0 30.0 76.0 49.0 0.0 7.0


17

Comparison of Marshal l H i l l ’sSpr ing 2018 Administrat ion



Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

3 4.0 4.0 7.0 12.0 14.0 25.0 61.0 53.0 14.0 7.0

4 0.0 4.0 5.0 9.0 26.0 25.0 38.0 48.0 31.0 15.0

5 11.0 7.0 14.0 9.0 14.0 29.0 58.0 50.0 3.0 5.0

6 3.0 5.0 22.0 9.0 35.0 30.0 38.0 49.0 3.0 7.0


18

Comparison of Paradise Knol l ’sSpr ing 2018 Administrat ion



Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

3 11.0 4.0 17.0 12.0 30.0 25.0 39.0 53.0 2.0 7.0

4 2.0 4.0 11.0 9.0 32.0 25.0 43.0 48.0 11.0 15.0

5 10.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 31.0 29.0 44.0 50.0 8.0 5.0

6 5.0 5.0 10.0 9.0 31.0 30.0 43.0 49.0 12.0 7.0


19

Comparison of Upper Greenwood Lake’sSpr ing 2018 Administrat ion



Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

3 0.0 4.0 6.0 12.0 10.0 25.0 73.0 53.0 10.0 7.0

4 3.0 4.0 13.0 9.0 20.0 25.0 58.0 48.0 8.0 15.0

5 13.0 7.0 11.0 9.0 29.0 29.0 44.0 50.0 2.0 5.0

6 7.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 30.0 30.0 47.0 49.0 9.0 7.0


20

Comparison of Westbrook’sSpr ing 2018 Administrat ion



Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

3 2.0 4.0 11.0 12.0 30.0 25.0 52.0 53.0 5.0 7.0

4 2.0 4.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 25.0 60.0 48.0 20.0 15.0

5 2.0 7.0 13.0 9.0 34.0 29.0 48.0 50.0 4.0 5.0

6 5.0 5.0 5.0 9.0 40.0 30.0 44.0 49.0 7.0 7.0


21

Comparison of Apshawa’s Spr ing 2018 Administrat ion

Mathematics to West Mi l ford’sPercentages for 2018


Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

3 0.0 1.0 12.0 12.0 24.0 26.0 48.0 50.0 16.0 11.0

4 9.0 5.0 40.0 16.0 33.0 30.0 19.0 45.0 0.0 4.0

5 0.0 6.0 18.0 18.0 30.0 31.0 48.0 42.0 5.0 2.0

6 4.0 4.0 15.0 19.0 30.0 36.0 48.0 39.0 2.0 2.0

in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.*Some students in grade 8 participated

Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. 22

Comparison of Maple Road’s Spr ing 2018 Administrat ion



Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

30.0 1.0 26.0 12.0 34.0 26.0 40.0 50.0 0.0 11.0

43.0 5.0 14.0 16.0 31.0 30.0 50.0 45.0 3.0 4.0

53.0 6.0 7.0 18.0 31.0 31.0 52.0 42.0 7.0 2.0

60.0 4.0 14.0 19.0 41.0 36.0 43.0 39.0 3.0 2.0



Comparison of Marshal l H i l l ’s Spr ing 2018 Administrat ion



Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

3 0.0 1.0 4.0 12.0 14.0 26.0 54.0 50.0 29.0 11.0

4 0.0 5.0 15.0 16.0 26.0 30.0 56.0 45.0 3.0 4.0

5 6.0 6.0 17.0 18.0 28.0 31.0 50.0 42.0 0.0 2.0

6 0.0 4.0 16.0 19.0 49.0 36.0 35.0 39.0 0.0 2.0



Comparison of Paradise Knol l ’s Spr ing 2018 Administrat ion



Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

3 2.0 1.0 13.0 12.0 37.0 26.0 46.0 50.0 2.0 11.0

4 2.0 5.0 7.0 16.0 41.0 30.0 43.0 45.0 7.0 4.0

5 13.0 6.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 31.0 51.0 42.0 0.0 2.0

6 2.0 4.0 24.0 19.0 33.0 36.0 38.0 39.0 2.0 2.0



Comparison of Upper Greenwood Lake’s Spr ing 2018 Administrat ion



Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

3 0.0 1.0 8.0 12.0 13.0 26.0 58.0 50.0 21.0 11.0

4 8.0 5.0 15.0 16.0 33.0 30.0 43.0 45.0 3.0 4.0

5 11.0 6.0 27.0 18.0 29.0 31.0 31.0 42.0 2.0 2.0

6 7.0 4.0 26.0 19.0 33.0 36.0 28.0 39.0 7.0 2.0



Comparison of Westbrook’sSpr ing 2018 Administrat ion



Level 1, District

Level 2, School

Level 2,District

Level 3, School

Level 3, District

Level 4, School

Level 4, District

Level 5, School

Level 5, District

3 4.0 1.0 9.0 12.0 33.0 26.0 51.0 50.0 2.0 11.0

4 6.0 5.0 6.0 16.0 19.0 30.0 60.0 45.0 10.0 4.0

5 4.0 6.0 20.0 18.0 43.0 31.0 32.0 42.0 2.0 2.0

6 7.0 4.0 16.0 19.0 35.0 36.0 42.0 39.0 0.0 2.0



Asian Black/African American Hispanic White Female Male

14-15 100.0 50.0 70.0 49.8 55.7 45.915-16 66.7 0.0 62.5 58.4 66.7 49.616-17 57.1 60.0 38.9 53.7 59.8 45.717-18 50.0 33.3 61.1 59.7 65.7 54.3

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

28

COMPARISON OF WEST MILFORD’S RACE/GENDERPERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS SCORING 4 OR 5

GRADE 3 – ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS2015-2018


14-15 50 33.3 33.3 50.8 52.5 45.315-16 50 50 45.5 62.6 67.2 55.916-17 50 0 66.7 66.5 72.8 57.317-18 50 80 68.4 62.4 70.6 55.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

29


GRADE 4 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS2015-2018


14-15 50.0 33.3 45.5 48.7 49.0 47.215-16 100.0 0.0 75.0 52.2 54.2 51.816-17 100.0 50.0 50.0 65.8 73.3 56.717-18 50.0 0.0 38.5 58.4 71.1 41.2

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

30




14-15 16.7 0.0 50.0 62.0 72.0 43.615-16 100.0 0.0 41.7 51.2 56.2 45.216-17 100.0 0.0 61.1 58.9 64.0 50.417-18 100.0 33.3 18.8 58.3 67.2 44.4

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

31




14-15 50.0 100.0 31.3 38.2 57.9 23.515-16 33.3 0.0 41.2 54.4 64.0 39.516-17 50.0 66.7 50.0 54.7 62.4 48.517-18 100.0 16.7 65.0 58.3 67.7 47.1

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

32




14-15 100.0 33.3 25.0 49.2 60.6 36.015-16 83.3 50.0 47.4 53.1 71.0 38.616-17 100.0 66.7 63.2 60.4 73.1 49.217-18 66.7 0.0 33.3 62.9 70.6 51.4

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

33




14-15 100.0 0.0 0.0 36.5 42.4 28.215-16 100.0 25.0 53.3 58.5 67.5 46.516-17 83.3 50.0 35.0 45.9 60.4 34.617-18 66.7 0.0 40.9 47.0 60.0 32.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

34




14-15 0.0 0.0 12.5 25.0 42.5 13.715-16 100.0 0.0 8.3 35.0 42.5 25.416-17 66.7 0.0 5.6 43.4 52.8 26.117-18 66.7 100.0 21.1 42.8 60.0 27.1

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

35




14-15 50.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 67.3 28.615-16 0.0 0.0 50.0 35.6 52.5 25.216-17 33.3 25.0 27.3 37.9 41.5 32.817-18 100.0 25.0 6.7 30.2 37.7 21.1

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

36




14-15 100.0 0.0 50.0 52.1 50.4 53.215-16 66.7 0.0 50.0 59.6 67.5 50.016-17 57.1 40.0 55.6 57.3 56.8 56.917-18 50.0 33.3 55.6 61.9 57.6 62.5

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

37


GRADE 3 - MATHEMATICS2015-2018


14-15 50.0 0.0 27.8 36.4 37.8 33.015-16 100.0 0.0 45.5 52.7 53.0 51.716-17 50.0 0.0 41.7 50.7 54.4 44.317-18 33.3 20.0 42.1 51.1 49.2 50.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

38




14-15 50.0 0.0 27.3 29.7 26.0 32.115-16 75.0 0.0 56.3 45.8 44.5 46.816-17 100.0 0.0 25.0 48.7 44.2 50.417-18 50.0 0.0 38.5 46.6 52.6 38.2

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

39




14-15 50.0 0.0 40.0 42.1 42.4 38.915-16 50.0 0.0 25.0 43.7 39.0 44.416-17 50.0 0.0 50.0 42.1 44.8 37.617-18 100.0 0.0 12.5 43.9 48.4 34.9

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

40




14-15 80.0 0.0 12.5 23.7 32.5 17.815-16 50.0 0.0 23.5 29.3 28.8 28.616-17 0.0 0.0 16.7 33.2 31.2 31.817-18 50.0 0.0 45.0 34.3 33.8 34.5

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

41




14-15 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 12.1 7.615-16 33.3 50.0 5.9 18.2 22.5 13.816-17 0.0 0.0 12.5 15.3 12.1 17.417-18 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.3 21.5 20.4

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

42




14-15 100.0 0.0 12.5 25.0 28.1 22.115-16 66.7 0.0 9.5 29.9 32.0 25.916-17 57.1 0.0 18.2 23.6 22.6 24.417-18 25.0 0.0 21.7 32.9 32.5 29.5

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

43


MATHEMATICS – ALGEBRA I2015-2018


14-15 100.0 0.0 0.0 14.7 19.5 12.915-16 0.0 0.0 9.1 22.0 25.9 16.016-17 50.0 0.0 4.8 14.1 14.6 14.017-18 50.0 0.0 14.3 15.7 20.8 12.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

44


MATHEMATICS – GEOMETRY2015-2018


14-15 0.0 0.0 33.3 24.2 13.2 39.315-16 100.0 0.0 20.0 21.4 23.1 21.716-17 0.0 0.0 40.0 30.5 29.1 32.417-18 60.0 0.0 11.1 19.5 27.0 13.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

45


MATHEMATICS – ALGEBRA I I2015-2018

parcc results€¦ · 25.00%. 35.00%. 45.00%. 55.00%. 65.00%. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 3rd. 4th....

Documents