parks master plan - welcome to cape coral, fl · 2019-12-27 · parks master plan. interim...
TRANSCRIPT
Parks Master PlanInterim Presentation: Existing Conditions Analysis/ Needs and Priorities Assessment
May 4, 2016
1. Overview, Schedule
2. Existing Conditions/ Needs Assessment Findings
3. Next Steps, Questions, Discussion
Presentation Outline
Purpose of Parks Master Plan
1.Identify issues, needs, and opportunities of the City’s Parks System for the revision of the Parks Master Plan;
2.Ensure adequate growth of the Cape Coral Parks System; 3.Modernization of the level of service (LOS) standards in the
Comprehensive Plan;4.Continual funding opportunities for the parks system; 5.Provide planning actions and acquisition needs for the Parks
and Recreation Department through build out (2060).
City of Cape Coral, Request for Proposals Parks Master Plan Update (RFP-DCD15-28/CH)
Barth Associates Team
Carlos F. Perez, PLA
Market Research + Survey Consultant
Principle-In-Charge + Parks Planner
David L. Barth PhD, CPRP, PLA, AICP
Project Manger + Parks Planner, Urban Designer
Operations + Maintenance Consultant
Ken Ballard, CPRP, Ballard*King
Ron Vine, ETC/ Leisure Vision
Alternative Funding Specialist
Editor
Ryan Ruskay, RMPK Funding
Lynn Hays
Wildlife Ecologist Jay Exum, PhD, Exum Associates
Project Schedule
Project Tasks Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov
Phase 1 – Existing Conditions AnalysisPhase 2 – Needs + PrioritiesAssessmentPhase 3 –VisioningPhase 4 -Implementation StrategyPhase 5 – ParksMaster Plan Document
2015 | 2016 2015 2016
Task Time Period Survey Public Engagement Stakeholder Committee + Council Presentations
1. Overview, Schedule
2. Existing Conditions/ Needs Assessment Findings
3. Next Steps, Questions, Discussion
Presentation Outline
Existing Conditions Analysis, Needs + Priorities Assessment
Observations
• Stakeholder Committee Workshop
• Public Outreach Meetings
• One-on-One Interviews
• Focus Group Meetings
• Lifestyle Analysis• Park Visits, Ecological Assessment
• Existing Plans Review• National +Regional + Local Trends• Population + Demographic Analysis
Qualitative Quantitative
Defensible + Identified
Needs
• Level of Service Analysis
• Statistically Valid Mail Survey
• Online Survey• PRORAGIS
Benchmarking
Summary of Findings - FacilitiesNeeds Assessment Techniques
Facilities
Stati
stica
lly
Valid
Sur
vey
Publi
c Ou
treac
h Me
eting
s
Inter
views
Focu
s Gro
up
Meeti
ngs
On-L
ine
Surve
y
LOS
Analy
sis
Site
Evalu
ation
s
High
Pr
iorit
y Ne
eds
Beach X X X XSmall neighborhood parks X X XNature parks X X XIndoor fitness/cardiovascular equipment X XLarge community parks X X X
Medi
um P
riorit
y Ne
eds
Trails X X X X X XIndoor running/walking track X XFishing areas X X XYacht club X XBoating/kayaking areas X X X X XWaterpark X XDog Park X XTheater X X
Lowe
r Prio
rity N
eeds
Golf Course X X XArt studio X XCentral gathering place X XGymnasium X X X Environmental Center X X XHistorical Museum X XBaseball/softball fields/Complex X X XYouth center X XPickleball courts X X X X XSoccer fields X XSkate park X XFootball Fields X X X
Othe
r Ne
eds
Improvements to Existing Parks X X X XFestival Park/Amphitheater X XNew Indoor Community Center X XTennis Courts/Complex XFootball/Soccer/Lacrosse Complex X
Summary of Findings - ProgramsNeeds Assessment Techniques
Programs
Stati
stica
lly
Valid
Sur
vey
Publi
c Ou
treac
h Me
eting
s
Inter
views
Focu
s Gr
oup
Meeti
ngs
On-L
ine
Surve
y
High
Pr
iorit
y Ne
eds
Special events (concerts, movies, etc.) X X X
Adult fitness and wellness programs X X X
Adult programs for 50 years and older X X X X
Medi
um P
riorit
y Ne
eds
Adult continuing education programs X X
Nature programs/environmental education X X X
Water fitness programs X
Adult sports programs X
Sailing/boating programs X X
Othe
r Nee
ds
Adult art, dance, performing arts X XGolf lessons and leagues XYouth learn to swim programs X XPrograms for teens X XYouth art, dance, performing arts XYouth sports programs XTravel programs X XTennis lessons and leagues X
Youth fitness and wellness programs X
Before and after school programs X
Programs for people with disabilities XPreschool programs X
1. Existing Plans and Context Review
1. Existing Plans and Context Review• The 2002 Parks and Recreation Master
Plan• 2005 Cultural Park Arts Center• Water Access Map• Comprehensive Plan (Level of Service,
Recreation and Open Space Element, Vision Plan)
• 2014 South Cape Downtown Community Redevelopment Plan
• Bimini Basin Project• FY 2015-2017 Operating Budget• Southwest Community Park• Yacht Club Master Plan• Seven Islands & NW Cape Vision Plan• Bicycle/ Pedestrian Master Plan
1. Increase economic development and development in the City. 2. Enhance financial sustainability during all economic times. 3. Invest in community infrastructure, including utilities expansion
improvements to enhance the City’s ability to meet the needs of its current and future residents.
4. Improve the City’s image with the purpose of building lasting relationships with our residents and valuable partnerships with other organizations.
5. Increase quality of life for our citizens by delivering programs and services that foster a safe community.
FY 2015-2017 Adopted Operating Budget
Comprehensive Plan: Recreation and Open Space
Current Level of Service Standards:• Regional Park – 4 acres per
1,000 population• Community Park – 2 acres
per 1,000 population• Neighborhood Park – 2 acres
per 1,000 population• Specialty Parks* – ½ acres
per 1,000 population
* Includes Athletic Fields, Environmental Parks, Aquatic Facilities, and Golf Courses.
Strategic Plan
“In partnership with the community, we are stewards of our unique environment and quality of life, and meet the economic, social, cultural, institutional and environmental needs of our citizens.”
Parks Master Plan Initiative:Update the Master Plan to reflect current state of the parks system and provide a recommendation to City Council with a prioritized list of projects for City at build-out.
2. Demographic Analysis – Population Change
% Change2000-2010 % Change 2010-2014
City of Cape Coral 102,286
169,8542014 Population2000 Population
Lee County 440,888
640,513
Florida 15,982,37819,893,297
2000 % of Population
ElderlyPopulation (65+)
Young AdultPopulation (20-34)
Young ChildrenPopulation (0-9)
Median Age 41.642.4
Middle AgePopulation (55-64)
2010 % of Population
12.0%
15.0%
11.4%
11.5%
15.5%
14.0%
19.6%
Teenager Population (10-19) 12.5% 13.3%
2.Demographic Analysis – Population by Age
AdultPopulation (35-54)
29.5% 28.8%
16.9%
2000-2010% of change
2.Demographic Analysis – Findings
• “Meteoric Growth”
• Need ample and appropriate facilities, activities, and programs to meet growing needs and desires without reducing existing LOS
• Need to provide a variety of parks and recreation programs and activities for residents of all ages, with special attention given to adult and youth programs
• May need to increase the amount of park land, facilities, and programs to keep up with demand
3. Inventory
• 43 parks and recreation facilities, 833 acres
• Preserve, 356 acres (Four-mile Cove)
• Athletic fields, 170 acres• Specialty parks (BMX,
Seahawk, etc.), 79 acres– 74% of park land is
restricted or specialized
4. Existing Level-of-Service (LOS) - Acreage
2014 Population Estimates 169,854
City Build-Out Population400,000
Park Acreage Calculation
City of Cape Coral Comprehensive
Plan Acreage LOS Target
Acreage2014
Target Acreage
AcreageNeed /
Surplus
City Build-Out Target Acreage
AcreageNeed /
Surplus
Total Park Acreage 8.50 829.60 1,443.76 (614) 3,400.00 (2,570)
Regional Park 4.0 365.00 679.42 (314) 1,600.00 (1,235)
Community Park 2.0 59.00 339.71 (281) 800.00 (741)
Neighborhood Park 2.0 59.65 339.71 (280) 800.00 (740)
Specialty Park 0.5 345.95 84.93 261 200.00 146
Existing LOS – Acreage(NRPA PRORAGIS Benchmarking)
City of Cape Coral
National Acreage LOS Median for Agencies with Population Density’s
between 500 to 1,500 per Square Mile (Acres per 1,000 population)
Acreage LOS Target
(Acres per 1,000 population)
2014 Acreage LOS
(Acres per 1,000 population)
City Build-Out Acreage LOS
(Acres per 1,000 population)
12.1 8.5 4.9 2.1
Existing LOS – Indoor Recreation
Industry Benchmark
(Square Feet Per Capita)
City of Cape Coral
Recreation Center Square
Footage
2014 Benchmark
Target
Square Footage Need /
Surplus
City Build-Out
Benchmark Target
Square Footage Need /
Surplus
City of Cape Coral Indoor Recreation Center Space
1.5 88,302 254,781 (166,479) 600,000 (511,698)
Existing LOS -Facilities
2014 Population Estimates
169,854
City Build-Out Population400,000
Recreation Facility Types
City of Cape Coral Comprehensive
Plan Acreage LOS Target (1 per x
persons)
Number of City of
Cape Coral Facilities
2014 Target Facilities
FacilitiesNeed /
Surplus
City Build-Out Target Facilities
FacilitiesNeed /
Surplus
Basketball Goals 2,500 16 68 (52) 160 (144)BMX Bicycle Course 400,000 1 0 1 1 0
Boat Ramp Lanes 10,000 7 17 (10) 40 (33)
Bocce Courts 30,000 6 6 0 13 (7)
Diamond Field Sports 4,000 33 42 (9) 100 (67)
Exercise Course 50,000 17 3 14 8 9
Golf Course 100,000 1 2 (1) 4 (3)
Gridiron - Soccer 10,000 13 17 (4) 40 (27)Gridiron -Football 20,000 6 8 (2) 20 (14)
Horseshoe Pits 15,000 10 11 (1) 27 (17)
Picnic Tables 725 347 234 113 552 (205)Play Areas, Equipped 10,000 24 17 7 40 (16)
Racquetball Courts 25,000 2 7 (5) 16 (14)
Senior Center 50,000 2 3 (1) 8 (6)Shuffleboard Courts 25,000 2 7 (5) 16 (14)
Swimming Pools 50,000 1 3 (2) 8 (7)
Tennis Courts 7,500 10 23 (13) 53 (43)
Volleyball Courts 25,000 - 7 (7) 16 (16)Nature Trails (Miles) 50,000 - 3 (3) 8 (8)
Bicycle/Jogging Paths (Miles) 0.56 miles per 1,000 17 95 (78) 224 (207)
National Benchmarking (PRORAGIS) - Facilities
Facilities National Median LOS(1 per X persons)
City of Cape Coral Comprehensive Plan Facilities LOS (1 per X persons)
Diamond Fields 3,333 4,000Rectangle Fields 8,124
Soccer Fields 10,000Football Fields 20,000
Playgrounds 3,899 10,000Dog Parks 53,915 -Tennis Courts 4,413 7,500Basketball Courts 7,526 5,000Indoor Recreation Center 24,804 -Swimming Pools 33,660 50,000Senior Center 50,000 50,000Golf Course (population per 9 holes)
26,288 200,000
Outdoor Facility Type
Southwest Region LOS
X/1000 Participants
Number of City of Cape Coral
Facilities
Need Based on Participants in
2014
Need / Surplus to meet Southwest
Region LOS
Need Based on Participants in City Build-Out
Need / Surplus to meet Southwest
Region LOS
Baseball Fields 0.85 15 15.88 (0.88) 37.40 (22.40)
Outdoor Basketball Courts 0.86 8 13.15 (5.15) 30.96 (22.96)
Football Fields 0.48 6 7.34 (1.34) 17.28 (11.28)
Golf (# of holes) 1.94 18 65.90 (47.90) 155.20 (137.20)
Tennis Courts 1.46 10 32.24 (22.24) 75.92 (65.92)
Soccer Fields 0.45 13 7.64 5.36 18.00 (5.00)
Outdoor Swimming Pools 0.09 1 4.28 (3.28) 10.08 (9.08)
Paved Trails (Miles) 0.11 17 8.41 8.59 19.80 (2.80)
Saltwater Boat Ramps (Lanes) 0.16 7 6.79 0.21 16.00 (9.00)
Picnicking (Tables) 3.95 347 261.66 85.34 616.20 (269.20)
State Benchmarking (SCORP) - Facilities
Existing LOS - Access
Neighborhood Parks: 1,2 milesCommunity Parks: 3,5 miles
Recreation Centers: 3,5 milesAthletic Facilities: 3,5 miles
Playgrounds: 1,2 miles
All Parks: 1,2,3 miles
All Parks Access LOS
1 Mile 2 Mile 3 Mile
Neighborhood Parks Access LOS1 Mile 2 Mile
Playground Access LOS1 Mile 2 Mile
Community Park Access LOS3 Mile 5 Mile
Recreation Center Access LOS3 Mile 5 Mile
Athletic Facilities Access LOS3 Mile 5 Mile
Existing LOS – Potential Needs
• Additional Parkland• Indoor Recreation Center
Space• Boat Ramps • Diamond Fields• Golf Courses• Soccer Fields• Football Fields• Horseshoe Pits• Play Areas
• Racquetball Courts• Senior Centers• Shuffle Board Courts• Swimming Pools• Tennis Courts• Volleyball Courts• Nature Trails• Bicycle/Jogging paths
5. Park VisitsCriteria• Proximity, Access and Linkages • Comfort and Image• Uses, Activities, and Sociability• Environmental Sustainability • Buildings and Architecture
1.0 – 2.9 = Not Meeting Expectations
3.0 – 3.9 = Meeting Expectations
4.0 – 4.9 = Exceeding Expectations
5.0 = Far Exceeding Expectations
Scoring:
Park Visits
Burto
n M
emor
ial P
ark
Cap
e C
oral
Spo
rts C
ompl
ex
Eagl
e Sk
ate
Park
Jaso
n Ve
rdow
Mem
oria
l Par
k
Koza
/Sal
adin
o Pa
rk
Nor
thw
est S
oftb
all C
ompl
ex
Pelic
an B
aseb
all C
ompl
ex
Pelic
an S
occe
r Com
plex
Stor
m F
ootb
all C
ompl
ex
Stau
sser
BM
X Sp
ots
Com
plex
BMX
Park
Boa
t Ram
p
Cam
elot
Par
k
Jayc
ee P
ark
Jim
Jef
fers
Par
k
Joe
Ston
is P
ark
Vete
rans
Par
k
Arts
Stu
dio/
Rub
icon
d Pa
rk
Four
Fre
edom
s Pa
rks
Frei
da S
mith
Spe
cial
Po
pula
tion
Cen
ter
Lake
Ken
nedy
Com
mun
ity
Park
(Gre
ensp
ace)
Lake
Ken
nedy
Sen
ior C
ente
r
Rot
ary
Park
Willi
am "B
ill" A
uste
n Yo
uth
Cen
ter
Del
Pra
do L
inea
r Par
k
Hor
ton
Park
Tota
l
Proximity/ Access/ Linkages (Max 5.0) 3.0 2.3 3.3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.2 3.0 3.2 3.5 2.5 3.5 2.6 3.3 3.7 2.8 3.2Visibility from a distance 5 2 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 2 4 5 3 4.4
Ease in walking to the park property 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 - 1 4 2 2.1Transit Access 1 1 3 4 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 3 4 1 1.8
Clarity of information/ signage 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3.1ADA Compliance 4 3 4 3 5 5 5 5 2 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 2 5 4 4 2 5 4.1
Lighting 3 3 5 4 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 - 3 5 5 3 3 3 5 1 5 3 5 3 3 3.6
Comfort & Image (Max 5.0) 3.7 3.2 3.3 3.1 3.7 3.8 3.5 4.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.7 3.7 3.8 4.2 3.3 3.6 4.1 3.75 3.67 3.9 3.8 3.6 3.5 3.2 3.6First Impression/overall attractiveness 3 4 1 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 5 2 2 4 3 4 3 2 3 4 4 3.4
Feeling of safety 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.1Cleanliness/overall quality of maintenance (Exterior) 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3.6Cleanliness/overall quality of maintenance (Interior) - - 4 3 - - - - 3 - - - - - - - 3 4 4 - 4 4 4 - - 3.7
Comfort of places to sit 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 2 4 4 3 4 2 3.0Protection from bad weather 4 2 5 3 3 4 2 4 3 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 1 1 3.6
Evidence of management/stewardship (Exterior Site) 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 3.8Evidence of management/stewardship (Interior) - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 4 4 - 4 4 4 - - 3.7
Uses and Activities & Sociability (Max 5.0) 3.6 3.6 4.2 2.8 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.0 3.6 2.2 4.0 4.0 3.2 4.0 3.7 3.8 3.2 3.6 3.0 4.2 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4Mix of uses/things to do 3 3 5 2 4 2 2 4 2 3 1 4 4 4 4 3 5 3 4 2 4 4 3 3 1 3.2
Level of Activity 4 4 4 - 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 2 5 4 3 3 5 3.8Sense of pride/ownership 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 4 4 4 - 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3.8
Programming Flexibility 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 2 3.2Ability of Facility to Effectively Support Organized Programming 4 4 4 3 4 2 2 2 3 4 4 - - 2 - - 2 2 2 - 4 2 2 3 4 3.0
Environmental Sustainability 3.5 3.5 3.7 2.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.5 2.5 3.5 3.5 2.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.3 3.3 4.3 4.5 4.3 4.0 3.7 4.0 3.5 3.6Stormwater Management 5 4 5 2 5 5 5 5 2 5 5 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 - 5 4.6
Multi-modal Capacity 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 4 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 - 1 4 2 2.5Facility Energy Efficiency - - 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 3 4 - 4 3 5 - - 3.9
Buildings/Architecture (Max 5.0) - - 1.6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.4 3.6 3.2 - 3.6 4.2 4.0 - - 3.2Image and Aesthetics - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 4 2 - 3 4 3 - - 2.9
Clarity of Entry and Connections to Park - - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 2 3 - 3 4 4 - - 3.1Interior Finishes and Furniture and Equipment - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 4 3 - 4 4 3 - - 3.0
Building Enclosure - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 4 4 - 4 5 5 - - 3.7Building Systems - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 4 4 - 4 4 5 - - 3.4
Average Score Without Building/Architecture (Max 5) 3.4 3.2 3.6 3.0 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.8 2.9 3.5 3.0 3.2 3.8 3.5 3.8 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.8 3.4 3.9 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.2 Overall Average
Average Score with/for Building/Architecture (Max 5) 3.2 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.5
Meeting Expectations
Not Meeting Expectations
Far Exceeding Expectations
Exceeding Expectations
7. Park Operations & Maintenance
Maintenance Challenges:• Limited Resources• Additional Parks • Athletic Field Maintenance • Watering Restrictions • Multiple Groups Responsible
for Maintenance• Support Facilities• Tournaments/Special Events
8. Public Workshops – 191+/- Participants
• SOUTHEAST: Tuesday January 26th, Cape Coral Yacht Club
• NORTHWEST: Thursday January 28th, Christa McAuliffe Elementary School
• NORTHEAST: Monday, March 7th, King’s Way Christian Center
• SOUTHWEST: Tuesday, March 8th, Oasis Elementary School
Public Workshops
• Exercise #1 – City-wide Needs• Exercise #2 – Improvements to
Existing Facilities• Exercise #3 – Priority Actions• Exercise #4 – Other Comments
Public Workshops
Top priority facility needs included (in order of priority):• Trails (62 “votes”)• Nature Parks (61)• Pickleball Courts (61)• Large Nature Preserve (48)• Golf Course (46)• Boating and Kayaking Parks (41)• Beach (especially in the north) (34)• Gymnasiums (34)
Top priority program needs included (in order of priority):• Nature/ Environmental Education
Programs (35 “votes”)• Special Events (21)• Sailing/ Boating Programs (17)
Top priority actions included:• Acquire the 160-acre Cape
Coral Golf Club (167 “votes”)• Develop new walking and
biking trails (72)• Develop a new indoor
community center (39)• Improve existing boating/
kayaking areas (33)• Acquire the Christ Lutheran
Church (28)
Public Workshops
9. Mayor, Council Interviews
Two priority parks and recreation needs include:• Renovation of the Yacht
Club (5 of 8 interviews)• Build Festival Park,
including amphitheater (4 of 8)
Other priority needs include: • Community Center • Parks in Northeast • More kayak launches • Pickleball courts • Dog parks • Programs for all ages, especially for youth, and
promotion of existing programs • Cultural Park • Dutch Lions • Upkeep and maintenance of existing parks • Trails, passive recreation • Museum • Something for kids, e.g. an extreme park with a
zip line, climbing wall, skate park, etc.• Fund the Veteran’s Museum• Restore the golf course
Mayor, Council InterviewsBenchmarks:• Port St. Lucie• Lee County• Jupiter• Palm Coast (Barth)
Funding:• Pay-As-You-Go: General consensus
re: general fund, impact fees, grants, and user fees.
• Borrowing/ Taxes: No consensus re: general obligation bond (via referendum), special tax assessment, millage increase
10. Focus Group Meetings
• Water access (6 participants)• Athletics (7 participants)• Seniors (4 participants)• Arts (3 participants)• Environment (6 participants)• Teens (1 participant, in
consultation with 4-5 other teens)
Needs and Desires:• Bonfire pits, streets for busking (street
performers), amphitheater, ramps and rails, graffiti wall, cafés within parks, pet friendly, greenhouse, nature and paths, ponds, used book and music store, free Wi-Fi, modern play,
• Transit for kids under 16• Basketball courts• Stages, places to perform• Open mike nights in parks; jam night at Jaycee
Park on Thursdays • Consider adding things to do at skate park,
including moveable furniture, etc.
Haylee VanVlymen + MerriBeth Farnham
Focus Group Meetings - Teens
Focus Group Meetings - Teens
11. On-line Survey – 1,032 Respondents• 41.2% parks and facilities rated Good or Excellent.• Top three parks and facilities: Yacht club, Small Neighborhood
Parks, and Baseball/softball fields.• Most Important: Small Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks,
Beach • 77.5% of respondent would be willing to travel 2 miles or more
to a neighborhood park • 58.9% of respondents have participated in programs over the
last 12 months. • Top 4 Facility Needs: Small neighborhood parks, nature parks,
trails, beach • Top 4 Program Needs: Special events, nature
programs/environmental education, adult fitness and wellness, teens
• Reasons for Non-participation: Program or facilities not offered, lack of awareness, distance from residence
• Top Indoor Programming Spaces: walking and jogging track (62.5%), aerobic/fitness/dance class space, weight room/cardiovascular equipment area
• 53.3 % of respondents very supportive of using tax dollars to fund new walking and biking trails.
12. Statistically-Valid Survey – 575 Respondents(95% level of Confidence, +/- 4% Accuracy)
Comparison of Top Priority Needs Per Quadrant
Summary of Findings - FacilitiesNeeds Assessment Techniques
Facilities
Stati
stica
lly
Valid
Sur
vey
Publi
c Ou
treac
h Me
eting
s
Inter
views
Focu
s Gro
up
Meeti
ngs
On-L
ine
Surve
y
LOS
Analy
sis
Site
Evalu
ation
s
High
Pr
iorit
y Ne
eds
Beach X X X XSmall neighborhood parks X X XNature parks X X XIndoor fitness/cardiovascular equipment X XLarge community parks X X X
Medi
um P
riorit
y Ne
eds
Trails X X X X X XIndoor running/walking track X XFishing areas X X XYacht club X XBoating/kayaking areas X X X X XWaterpark X XDog Park X XTheater X X
Lowe
r Prio
rity N
eeds
Golf Course X X XArt studio X XCentral gathering place X XGymnasium X X X Environmental Center X X XHistorical Museum X XBaseball/softball fields/Complex X X XYouth center X XPickleball courts X X X X XSoccer fields X XSkate park X XFootball Fields X X X
Othe
r Ne
eds
Improvements to Existing Parks X X X XFestival Park/Amphitheater X XNew Indoor Community Center X XTennis Courts/Complex XFootball/Soccer/Lacrosse Complex X
Summary of Findings - ProgramsNeeds Assessment Techniques
Programs
Stati
stica
lly
Valid
Sur
vey
Publi
c Ou
treac
h Me
eting
s
Inter
views
Focu
s Gr
oup
Meeti
ngs
On-L
ine
Surve
y
High
Pr
iorit
y Ne
eds
Special events (concerts, movies, etc.) X X X
Adult fitness and wellness programs X X X
Adult programs for 50 years and older X X X X
Medi
um P
riorit
y Ne
eds
Adult continuing education programs X X
Nature programs/environmental education X X X
Water fitness programs X
Adult sports programs X
Sailing/boating programs X X
Othe
r Nee
ds
Adult art, dance, performing arts X XGolf lessons and leagues XYouth learn to swim programs X XPrograms for teens X XYouth art, dance, performing arts XYouth sports programs XTravel programs X XTennis lessons and leagues X
Youth fitness and wellness programs X
Before and after school programs X
Programs for people with disabilities XPreschool programs X
1. Overview, Schedule
2. Existing Conditions/ Needs Assessment Findings
3. Next Steps, Questions, Discussion
Presentation Outline
Project Schedule
Project Tasks Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov
Phase 1 – Existing Conditions AnalysisPhase 2 – Needs + PrioritiesAssessmentPhase 3 –VisioningPhase 4 -Implementation StrategyPhase 5 – ParksMaster Plan Document
2015 | 2016 2015 2016
Task Time Period Survey Public Engagement Stakeholder Committee + Council Presentations
Additional Slides