parliamentary exchange and dialogue forum on discrimination nevşehir 10-11 september 2013
DESCRIPTION
Anti-discrimination law in the EU : Legislation and implementation process Isabelle ChopinTRANSCRIPT
NEVSEHIR10-11 September 2013
PARLIAMENTARY EXCHANGE AND DIALOGUE
DIALOGUE FORUM ON DISCRIMINATION
Anti-discrimination law in the EU : Legislation and implementation process
Isabelle Chopin
European Anti-discrimination legislation
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
• Directive 2000/43 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin
Racial Equality Directive
• Directive 2000/78 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation
Employment Equality Directive
European Anti-discrimination legislation
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
Aim: establish a frame to fight against discrimination based on racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age and sexual orientation, in order to implement the principle of equal treatment (article 1)
Directive 2000/43 covers racial and ethnic discrimination in employment and other fields (social protection, education, access to and supply of goods and services including housing)
Directive 2000/78 covers discrimination based on religion or belief, disability, age and sexual orientation only in the employment fieldEmployment: Access to employment, self employment and occupation (including selection criteria and recruitment conditions), access to vocational guidance and vocational training, employment and working conditions, membership or involvement in worker’s , employer’s or professional organisations
Personal scopeapplies to all persons, EU citizens and third country nationalsLegal and natural personsboth public and private sectors including public bodies
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
European Network of Independent Experts in the non-Discrimination Field
www.non-discrimination.net
www.migpolgroup.com
• wwwwww.migpolgroup.com• www.non-discrimination.net• www.migpolgroup.com• www.non-discrimination.net
Transposition
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
scope
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
Personal scope• applies to all persons, • EU citizens and third country nationals• Legal and natural persons• both public and private sectors including public bodies
Material scopeboth directives: employment and occupation (access to employment including self employment and occupation, vocational training, working conditions and membership or involvement in worker’s , employer’s or professional organisations
Material scope Racial Equality directive-social protection (social security and healthcare, social
advantages)-education- access to and supply of goods and services including housing
Grounds of discrimination
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
Race and ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, sexual orientation, age(Multiple discrimination, assumed or associated discrimination)
Directive does not define the grounds
Most Member States do not define the grounds
Most Member States have included all grounds of the Directives in their anti-discrimination law
Many Member States have opted for broader list
Concepts
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
Direct discrimination
Indirect discrimination
Harassment
Instruction to discriminate
Reasonable accomodation
Direct discrimination
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
• Need to demonstrate less favourable treatment
• Requirement for a comparison with another person in a similar situation but with different characteristics
• Possibility to use a comparator from the past or hypothetical
• Cannot be justified
Indirect discrimination
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
• Apparently neutral criterion, provision or practice
• Particular disadvantage compared to other persons (statistics)
• Intention to discriminate not required
• Can be justified (by legitimate aim and the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary)
Harassment and instruction
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
Harassment: • Unwanted conduct• Purpose or effect of :
violating the dignity of a person creating intimidating, hostile, degrading,
humiliating or offensive environment(gender law)
InstructionInstruction to discriminate against persons with a protected ground is deemed to be discrimination
Reasonable accommodation
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
• duty placed on employers
• to take appropriate measures, where needed in a particular case,
• to enable a person with a disability to have access to, participate in, or advance in employment, or to undergo training,
• unless such measures would impose a disproportionate burden on the employer’
Reasonable accommodation
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
No: Italy and Turkey Yes: Sweden (Iceland not explicitely) Religion: Bulgaria, FYR of Macedonia,
Romania, Spain Judicial interpretation: Austria, Germany
Exceptions to equal treatment
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
• Genuine and determining occupational requirement
• Employers with an ethos based on religion and belief
• Armed forces and other specific occupations
• Nationality• Family benefits• Public security, public order, criminal
offences, protection of health and protection of the rights and freedoms of others
• Positive action
Remedies and enforcement
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
JJudicial and administrative procedures
Legal standing and associations
Burden of proof
Victimisation
Sanctions and remediesudicial and administrative procedures
Legal standing and associations
Judicial and administrative procedures
Legal standing and associations
Burden of proof
Victimisation
Sanctions and remedies
Collective redress
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
Actio popularis is permitted by national law for discrimination cases in 16 countries (Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, France, the FYR of Macedonia, Germany, Hungary, Liechtenstein, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and Turkey
Class actions are permitted by law for discrimination cases in 12 countries: Bulgaria, Denmark, the FYR of Macedonia, Hungary, Iceland, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia and Slovenia. Judicial interpretation is required in two countries: Italy and Lithuania.
Duties of the State
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
Designation of a specialised body (RED)
Dissemination of information
Social and civil dialogue
Monitoring
Specialised Body
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
• independent assistance to victims
• conducting independent surveys
• publishing independent reports
• making recommendations
Specialised Bodies
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
European Anti-discrimination legislation
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
No = Austrian Equal Treatment Commission, Cyprus (although in practice both the Equality authority and the Anti-Discrimination Authority do inform victims of their rights), the Estonian Chancellor of Justice (that nevertheless does so in practice), the three Greek bodies, Lithuania, the Dutch Equal Treatment Commission, Norway and SpainInterpretation required: Bulgaria and Poland
Specialised bodies
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
No: Estonian Chancellor of Justice, the Greek Labour Inspectorate and Equal Treatment Committee, Slovenia and SpainJudicial interpretation: Estonia
Specialised bodies
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
No: Estonian Chancellor of Justice, the Greek Labour Inspectorate and Equal Treatment Committee, Slovenia and SpainJudicial interpretation: Estonia
Specialised bodies
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
No: Romania (although does so in practice), Spain, Sweden and the two bodies in the United Kingdom
Specialised Bodies
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
Yes: Austria , Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia , Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania, the Netherlands , Norway and Romania
European Anti-discrimination legislation
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
Yes: Bulgarian, Danish, Estonian, Hungarian, Irish, Lithuanian and Romanian
No: Austria, the Netherlands and Norway
Best Practices
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
• One single anti-discrimination Act• Protection for grounds of religion and belief, disability, age
and sexual orientation, outside the employment field• Effective and sufficient protection outside employment• Effective and sufficient protection regarding access to and
supply of goods and services and education
• Clear definitions• Protection against victimisation• Protection against discrimination by association or
assumption
• Shift of the burden of proof• Adequate sanctions, compensation• Legal standing for organisations, trade unions, individuals• Collective redress
Best Practices
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
• Effective and efficient Specialised body• With adequate resources• Performing independent functions
• Dissemination of information• Social dialogue• Cooperation and consultation with civil society
organisations
• Positive action measures
• Accompanying measures and programmes
• positive duty on the autorities to promote equality
Bad practices
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
• Complex legal framework and unclear procedures• Legal patchwork
• Lack of protection against racial, ethnic and religious discrimination in areas outside employment
• Lack of protection of all employees and self employed specially in the public sector
• No special provision regarding access to and supply of goods and services
• Lack of express prohibition of segregation in schools• Lack of protection against victimisation outside the
employment field
Bad practices
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
• Inconsistent definition of the shift of the burden of proof • Lack of adequate sanctions or of sanctions at all• Lack of effective programs enabling vulnerable groups
accessing legal system and preventing the repetition of discriminatory acts
• No real legal standing for organisations and lack of individual standing
• Bad understanding from judges and lawyers of concepts, identification of cases, collection of evidence
• Lack of mandate and effective means for the specialised body
• Cuts in funding affect effective support (legal aid, legal action from Equality Bodies)
• Lack of promotion of national or ethnic, cultural, religious and linguistic identity of minorities
• Lack of accompanying measures and policies to the law
European Network of independent experts in the non-discrimination field
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
Slide title goes here
Dialogue Forum on Discrimination, Nevsehir, 9-10 September 2013
Migration Policy Grouphttp://www.migpolgroup.com
European Network of independent experts in the field of non-discriminationhttp://www.non-discrimination.net
European Commissionhttp://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/aneval/legnet_en.htm
Fundamental Rights Agencyhttp://fra.europa.eu
European Commission against Racism and Intolerancewww.coe.int/T/E/human_rights/Ecri
Thank you for your attention
www.migpolgroup.com