Participatory Research Methods: Doing research inclusivelyMelanie Nind M.A.Nind@soton.ac.uk

Quest seminar 9 October 2013

A methodological story

Beginning

•Complexity/ My position at the start/ Language

•Study aims/ Methodological intentions

Middle

•Crisis moments/ Epiphanies/ Findings

End

My revised position

2

Complexity• Research about participatory methods using a

participatory approach

• Relationship between the 2

• And the tensions

3

Starting position“I am known as a researcher who has conducted research both on and with people with learning disabilities, interested in participatory research but not exclusively allied to it.”

“I find the moral case for inclusive research with people with learning disabilities compelling. I maintain that while research can be valid and emancipatory without always being inclusive, more work is needed to find what is possible and important for fully exploiting the potential of inclusive research.”

(Case for support)

4

Language

5

Inclusive research: a definitionWalmsley & Johnson (2003: 16):

•‘must address issues which really matter … and which ultimately leads to improved lives’

•‘must access and represent their views and experiences’ &

•reflect ‘that people with learning disabilities need to be treated with respect by the research community’

6

• Walmsley & Johnson (2003: 12) reflect, ‘we are troubled by a certain stifling of debate about the real difficulties of including people with learning disabilities in research. We believe it is time to challenge certain orthodoxies and assumptions in order to clarify what inclusive research is and how and where it can be applied’

• Study = response to the ‘failure to grapple honestly’ (Walmsley & Johnson 2003: 16) with the most sensitive questions, which is needed if the investment in inclusive research is to be a wise investment

7

8

Research aims

To build knowledge and capacity in inclusive research with people with learning disabilities.

1.Take stock of the knowledge base;

2.Produce guidance on the issues and challenges;

3.Develop materials and case studies;

4.Produce criteria for quality in inclusive research.

Research questions 1. What does working in partnership really mean?

2. What kinds of knowledge are attributable to IR?

3. How can outcomes of IR be assessed and authenticated?

4. What are the benefits & problems?

5. How might good science and good inclusive research practice come together?

6. What can be added from sharing & interrogating practice?

9

Methodological intentions(i) create vibrant interactive spaces in which best use

could be made of constructive friction within the field - transformative dialogue (Gergen 2009) in a stifled arena

(ii) reframe the debate so that the research process (rather than who is the expert) is central

(iii) involve participant-researchers ‘not only in the task of unveiling that reality [of inclusive research], and thereby coming to know it critically, but in the task of re-creating that knowledge’ (Freire 1970: 51).

(iv)co-construct knowledge in a design not unsympathetic to the focus on inclusive research 10

In practice

• Series of focus groups in dialogic relationship

• People traditionally with and without power ‘naming the world’ (Freire 1970: 69) together and not ‘on behalf of another’ (70).

11

12

Focus groups:

Participatory methods

• Talk

• Visual metaphor

• Visual recaps

• I-poems

13

Crisis brews• 1 person asks if people without learning

disabilities are allowed to speak

• jargon in the ethics form is criticised

• 1 person attacks language of digital story –word is child-like

• 1 person opts not to complete consent and take part

• Davey’s answer is corrected

• grenade is thrown!14

The grenade is thrown

“Before we do wrap up, I might discuss a question with you Melanie, I just want to know why you decided to do an inclusive research project and not being inclusive, because I don't get it.”

“to me this is again people are subjects”

Fieldnote: Helen reminds me this is useful. It is a position in the room that I can use to trigger responses etc. When I feel less bruised I will reflect more on this!!

15

Epiphany• Transition from talking about ‘inclusive research’

to ‘doing research inclusively’

• Could emphasising the verb rather than naming the approach liberate – unshackle us from the dogma?

• Could it give us permission for exploration, diversity, development?

• Participatory/inclusive research is not – and must not be - fixed

16

Findings: Diverse ways of working

17

Support

Negotiation

Interdependency

Support

Negotiation

Interdependency

Formalised Improvised

Findings: quality participation – quality research happens when:

• We answer questions we could not otherwise answer, but that are important

• We get access in ways we could not otherwise get

• We make critical use of insider, cultural knowledge

• The research is authentic (recognisable)

• We make impact/ a difference to people’s lives

18

My position at the end

Doing research inclusively

•Is hard (emotional labour greater + ask too much of it)

•Needs to go beyond claims making

•Is not necessarily better

•Retains an allure

•But requires critique and integrity

19

Further info• www.doingresearchinclusively.org

• Nind, M. & Vinha, M. Doing research inclusively: Bridges to multiple possibilities in inclusive research, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2012, i1-8.

Note: This work was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council grant RES-000-22-4423. I am grateful to the funder and to everyone who was involved in the study

20