patterns and trends in grade retention rates in the us

1
Patterns and Trends in Grade Retention Rates in the US, 1995-2010 John Robert Warren & Emily Hoffman, University of Minnesota and Megan Andrew, Notre Dame University Caren Arbeit, Stefanie Lightner, & jim saliba, University of Minnesota Minnesota Population Center QUESTIONS BACKGROUND TRENDS IN RETENTION RATES BY GRADE, YEAR, AND STUDENT ATTRIBUTES ANSWERS 1. How many students repeat grades each year? 2. Do retention rates vary across social and demographic groups? 3. Do retention rates vary over time or place? METHODS Our measure is based on a comparison of grade level in Year X to grade level in Year X-1 for 1995-2010 respondents to the October CPS We omit cases with imputed or implausible values We validate our measure against states’ reports and Warren and saliba’s (2012) estimates 1. About 2.4% of all students are retained; rates are highest in 1 st and 9 th grades 2. Rates vary in expected ways by sex, race and ethnicity, region, and parental education level 3. Rates have declined substantially for all groups and in all regions since about 2005 Despite extensive research on the predictors and consequences of repeating grades, we currently have no way of routinely monitoring retention rates 1. States’ reports are not comparable and are only available in some states and for some recent years 2. NCES’s longitudinal surveys are too infrequent 3. Warren and saliba’s (2012) rates only describe state and national rates for the entire population 4. “Below modal age for grade” is an imperfect proxy We improve on Hauser, Frederick, and Andrew’s (2007) measure and describe recent trends and patterns in retention rates Our rates are based on public Current Population Survey (CPS) data and can be produced annually 0% 3% 6% 9% 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 0% 3% 6% 9% 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 0% 3% 6% 9% 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 0% 3% 6% 9% 1995 2000 2005 2010 0% 3% 6% 9% 1995 2000 2005 2010 0% 3% 6% 9% 1995 2000 2005 2010 Boys Full Sample Girls Blacks Hispanics Whites HS Dropout HS Grad Some College College Grad Reten%on Rate by SEX by GRADE Reten%on Rate by RACE by GRADE Reten%on Rate by PARENTS’ EDUCATION by GRADE Reten%on Rate by SEX by YEAR Reten%on Rate by RACE by YEAR Reten%on Rate by PARENTS’ EDUCATION by YEAR Grade Year CONTRIBUTIONS Individual-level measure of grade retention that is available annually for a large and diverse sample Descriptions of rates and patterns of grade retention and how they vary across grades, over time, and across student sub-groups NEXT STEPS Expand rates to 2014 Model rates as a function of state education policy and state economic conditions to understand temporal, spatial, and socioeconomic patterns ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project benefited from the support of the Minnesota Population Center and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The Undergraduate Research Opportunities program also provided generous funding for this project.

Upload: others

Post on 06-Jul-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Patterns and Trends in Grade Retention Rates in the US

Patterns and Trends in Grade Retention Rates in the US, 1995-2010 John Robert Warren & Emily Hoffman, University of Minnesota and Megan Andrew, Notre Dame University Caren Arbeit, Stefanie Lightner, & jim saliba, University of Minnesota

Minnesota Population Center

QUESTIONS

BACKGROUND

TRENDS IN RETENTION RATES BY GRADE, YEAR, AND STUDENT ATTRIBUTES

ANSWERS

1. How many students repeat grades each year?

2. Do retention rates vary across social and demographic groups?

3. Do retention rates vary over time or place?

METHODS Our measure is based on a comparison of grade level in Year X to grade level in Year X-1 for 1995-2010 respondents to the October CPS

We omit cases with imputed or implausible values

We validate our measure against states’ reports and Warren and saliba’s (2012) estimates

1. About 2.4% of all students are retained; rates are highest in 1st and 9th grades

2. Rates vary in expected ways by sex, race and ethnicity, region, and parental education level

3. Rates have declined substantially for all groups and in all regions since about 2005

Despite extensive research on the predictors and consequences of repeating grades, we currently have no way of routinely monitoring retention rates

1.  States’ reports are not comparable and are only available in some states and for some recent years

2.  NCES’s longitudinal surveys are too infrequent 3.  Warren and saliba’s (2012) rates only describe state

and national rates for the entire population 4.  “Below modal age for grade” is an imperfect proxy

We improve on Hauser, Frederick, and Andrew’s (2007) measure and describe recent trends and patterns in retention rates

Our rates are based on public Current Population Survey (CPS) data and can be produced annually

0%  

3%  

6%  

9%  

1st   2nd   3rd   4th   5th   6th   7th   8th   9th  

0%  

3%  

6%  

9%  

1st   2nd   3rd   4th   5th   6th   7th   8th   9th  

0%  

3%  

6%  

9%  

1st   2nd   3rd   4th   5th   6th   7th   8th   9th  

0%  

3%  

6%  

9%  

1995   2000   2005   2010  

0%  

3%  

6%  

9%  

1995   2000   2005   2010  

0%  

3%  

6%  

9%  

1995   2000   2005   2010  

Boys Full Sample

Girls

Blacks Hispanics

Whites

HS Dropout HS Grad

Some College College Grad

Reten%on  Rate    by  SEX  by  GRADE  

Reten%on  Rate    by  RACE  by  GRADE  

Reten%on  Rate    by  PARENTS’  EDUCATION  by  GRADE  

Reten%on  Rate    by  SEX  by  YEAR  

Reten%on  Rate    by  RACE  by  YEAR  

Reten%on  Rate    by  PARENTS’  EDUCATION  by  YEAR  

Grade   Year  

CONTRIBUTIONS Individual-level measure of grade retention that is available annually for a large and diverse sample

Descriptions of rates and patterns of grade retention and how they vary across grades, over time, and across student sub-groups

NEXT STEPS Expand rates to 2014

Model rates as a function of state education policy and state economic conditions to understand temporal, spatial, and socioeconomic patterns

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project benefited from the support of the Minnesota Population Center and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The Undergraduate Research Opportunities program also provided generous funding for this project.