peace mornitoring analysis 1 english
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 Peace Mornitoring Analysis 1 English
1/4
Analysis on Peace Process in Myanmar
by BNIs Peace Monitoring team
1
Achieving Peace Through Ceasefires
Analysis paper number (1)
Its been over year since the Myanmar government initiated peace talks with the various ethnic
armed groups. The move was spearheaded by President Thein Seins new quasi-civilian
government on Aug. 18, 2012.
From the beginning, they stated that it will take three-years to achieve peace in Myanmar. But
after a year has come and gone, the government hasnt been able to move past preliminary
ceasefire dialogues with most of the nations ethnic armed groups.
If we analyze their peace process strategy; we find they are using a two- step process. The first
step is: ethnic armed groups who want to engage in peace talks with the government must
establish contact with the regional or state government before preliminary talks can commence.
Secondly, only after the preliminary talks have concluded, can they meet with the government's
peace team for further discussions.
Initially, most of the ethnic armed groups refused to meet with the government until they agreed
to meet with all the armed groups collectively, and revise the 2008 constitution. Most of the
armed groups want a return to federalism, which was promised under the Panglong agreement
and implemented by Aung Sans cabinet. But, unfortunately this never reached fruition, after he
was assassinated in July, 1947. Currently, most of the ethnic armed groups - with the exception
of the Kachin Independence Organisation (KIO) have entered into ceasefires with the central
government.
There were many contributing factors that pushed the various players to the table for peace talks.
The government faced pressure from the international community to end the ethnic armedstruggle before international sanctions can be lifted. Both internal and exiled political opposition
groups were also pushing the government to find a solution that would end the conflicts. Most of
the ethnic armed groups have always been motivated towards working for peace in their
respective territories.
Nearly all of the armed groups have entered into official peace negotiation talks, leading to the
signing of ceasefires. The United Wa State Army (UWSA) and National Democratic Alliance
Army (NDAA) were the first to sign ceasefires with the central government.
-
7/31/2019 Peace Mornitoring Analysis 1 English
2/4
Analysis on Peace Process in Myanmar
by BNIs Peace Monitoring team
2
The ceasefire agreements stipulated that the ethnic armed groups would be allowed to open
liaison offices, and move freely in their respective territories. But they failed to outline further
steps, which implement real reforms. Most of the areas inhabited by ethnic groups are still
heavily militarized; as a result many of the refugees, living in neighboring countries, dont feel
safe to return.
In Shan and Chin state, the Shan State Army (SSA) and Chin National Front (CNF) have already
opened liaison offices. Although, a positive first step, its still not a guarantee for lasting peace in
the region. Government armed forces have been fortifying their positions, both in Shan and
Karen states, and threatened, and even attacked the SSA within days of signing ceasefires. In
both areas, the military have been seizing territories previously controlled by ethnic armed
groups.
Even though ceasefires can be politically advantageous for both sides, it can be argued the
government has reaped more benefits than for the ethnic armed groups. Most of the peace
agreements have been based on four- points: signing ceasefires, the opening of liaison offices,
business opportunities for natural resource extraction and the ability for both sides to travel
freely. Ironically, these are the same points implemented by former regimes; the State Law and
Order Restoration Council (SLORC) and State Peace and Development Council (SPDC).
When we look at what has actually been accomplished, a year after peace negotiations began; its
obvious the government have already fallen short of several of their promises. Although the SSA
and CNF have opened liaison offices, freedom of movement is still severely restricted.
Furthermore, the government is hesitant to engage in political dialogue with ethnic armed groups
unless its relevant to business or development projects, offering commercial gain. Gold
exploration, opening commercial banks and establishing car licenses are seen by the government
as important as achieving peace.
Unfortunately, the government doesnt want to give up any ground. The direction of all the peace
negotiations has followed in line with the new constitution - pushed through while the nation was
still reeling from the environmental destruction caused by Cyclone Nargis, in 2008. Theconstitution does not guarantee any rights for ethnic minorities. The government's peace
negotiation team position is: "if you want to make constitutional amendment, first surrender and
join parliament. But its nearly impossible to amend the constitution when twenty-five seats are
reserved for the military and it takes seventy-six seats to amend it.
The way the peace process is going, its still unclear if it will lead towards lasting peace with the
ethnic armed groups. However, what is clear is the government eagerness to sign ceasefires that
pave the way for profitable business ventures in the resource rich areas where most of the ethnic
minorities live.
-
7/31/2019 Peace Mornitoring Analysis 1 English
3/4
Analysis on Peace Process in Myanmar
by BNIs Peace Monitoring team
3
While most of the ethnic armed groups have signed ceasefire agreement with the government
there are still daily clashes between the Kachin Independence Army (KIA) and government
troops - since they broke a seventeen-year ceasefire with Kachin Independence Organisation, on
June 9, 2011.
Its hard to trust the governments sincerity when they are discussing peace, and, at the same
time, their military is killing and raping Kachin civilians. Thousands of Kachin have been forced
to abandon their land. Most are living in internally displaced person (IDP) camps in KIO-
controlled territories. The fighting has continued, despite a presidential order by Thein Sein,
ordering the military to stop all offensives against the KIA.
Myanmar is a multicultural country, with many different ethnic groups. The government has a
responsibility to provide security and freedom for all of its citizens.
The democratic opposition groups in exile and inside, the ethnic armed groups and other aligned
armed groups have taken the first steps towards peace during negotiations with the central
government's peacemaking team. However, if their efforts are to lead towards meanifull change
they must provide constructive analysis to ensure they are heading down the right road for
lasting peace, and not only for business ventures.
All of the ethnic armed groups must work together to establish a common ground amongst
themselves, which they can bring to the table during future union level peace talks with
government officials. Its their responsibility to ensure preliminary talks lead towards genuine
political dialogue in the country.
Its impossible to establish peace in the country, through ceasefire agreements if all the
participants, including the government, dont share a common goal of working towards a nation
based on trust, unity, solidarity, transparency and accountability. To achieve this, they must be
able to learn from their mistakes in order to strengthen their weaknesses. During future peace
negotiations, participants must be flexible so discussion can progress into tangible results.
In order to establish genuine peace in the country, all of the various parties should work towardsceasefires, and stop the expansion of the military expansion in their respective territories;
allowing peace negotiations to move forward. Participants need to share a desire to establishing a
mutual respect and work towards political rights for everyone. In order to ensure the peace
negotiations follow in-line with the peoples wishes, they must publish detailed reports in a
timely manner. During peace talks, the government must stop using the state-run media as a
propaganda tool against the ethnic armed groups.
All parties, involved in peace negotiations process, must implement the following policies to
ensure its success in building a unified and prosperous nation for all its citizens.
-
7/31/2019 Peace Mornitoring Analysis 1 English
4/4
Analysis on Peace Process in Myanmar
by BNIs Peace Monitoring team
4
(1) Immediately stop all military offensives in ethnic areas, and remove military forces from the
conflict zones.
(2) Unconditionally release all the remaining political prisoners (including ethnic politicians)
from prison.
(3) Allow ethnic armed groups the freedom to engage with their respective ethnic communities.
(4) Through the preliminary talks, the central government must create a space which allows
inclusivity and transparency.
(5) All results of peace negotiations must be published.
**************************
References:
1. Union of Republic of Myanmar, Statement 1/2011
2. www.bbc.co.uk/burmese
3. Independence Mon News Agency
4. News Light of Myanmar, issued on 4/10/2011
5. www.phophtaw.org/burmese
6. http://burmese.voanews.com
7. President Thein Sein's speech on March 30, 2011
8. www.irrawaddy.org
9. www.bnionline.net
10. www.rfa.org/burmese