performance and production review of the department of

28
Performance and Production Review of the Department of Transportation FY 2009/10 Florida Transportation Commission September 15, 2010 1

Upload: others

Post on 23-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Performance and Production Review

of the

Department of Transportation

FY 2009/10

Florida Transportation Commission

September 15, 2010

1

Introduction

•Department Production

•Summary of Performance

•Detail Performance

Department Production

• 177 lane miles of capacity

• 3,072 lane miles of resurfacing

• 131 bridge repair contracts

• 25 bridge replacement contracts

• Let $2.3 billion in new construction

• Completed 372 projects at $2.59 B

Summary of Performance

•37 Performance Measures

–20 Primary

–17 Secondary

•Met 17 of 20 Primary (85%)

–1 Primary Measure with objective in

outer years are on track.

Percentage of Consultant Contracts Executed Compared to

the Number Planned: by Fiscal Year(Objective: at least 95%)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% of Plan 90.7% 97.0% 95.5% 96.3% 98.1%

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

LAP

Included

Percentage of Right-of-Way Projects Certified Compared to

the Number Planned: by Fiscal Year(Objective: at least 90%)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% Achieved 98.1% 95.9% 100.0% 100.0% 97.4%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Percentage of Construction Contracts Executed

Compared to the Number Planned:

by Fiscal Year(Objective: at least 95%)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% of Plan 79.6% 97.6% 96.7% 96.9% 99.0%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

LAP

included

Percentage of LAP Consultant Contracts Executed Compared

to the Number Planned: by Fiscal Year(Objective: at least 80%)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% of Plan 0 82.2% 90.0% 97.8% 98.1%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Percentage of LAP Construction Contracts Executed

Compared to the Number Planned: by Fiscal Year(Objective: at least 80%)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% of Plan 0 68.8% 89.9% 96.0% 94.7%

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

74.4% 73.9%79.8%

85.5%90.3%

25.6% 26.1%20.2%

14.5%9.7%

0%

50%

100%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% o

f C

on

tra

cts

% Meeting Objective % Not Meeting Objective

Time Adjustments: Construction Contracts

Percentage of Contracts Meeting ObjectiveObjective: 80% of contracts < or = 20% Over Original Time

372 Contracts Completed

# of Contracts that Account for 50%

of Total Additional Days(3,808 days added)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

# of Contracts to 50% 9 11 17 6 3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30# o

f C

on

tracts

Cost Adjustments: Completed Construction Contracts

Percentage of Contracts Meeting ObjectiveObjective: 90% of contracts < or = 10% Over Original Contract Amount

79.5%84.5% 84.8%

79.9%

89.5%

20.5%15.5% 15.2%

20.1%10.5%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% o

f C

on

tra

cts

% Meeting Objective % Not Meeting Objective

372 contracts completed

# of Contracts that Account for 50%

of Total Additional Cost($133.0 million in additional costs)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

# of Contracts to 50% 6 11 12 12 6

0

5

10

15

20

25

30# o

f C

on

tracts

0.18%0.13% 0.13% 0.15% 0.18%

0.00%

0.20%

0.40%

0.60%

0.80%

1.00%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Percentage of Structures on the SHS with Posted Weight Restrictions

(Objective: no more than 1%)

Restricted Bridges

Percentage of Structures on the SHS having a Condition Rating of either Excellent or Good

(Objective: at least 90%)

94.4% 94.3% 94.2% 94.6% 95.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% o

f S

tru

ctu

res

Bridge Condition

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% Meeting Objective 82.1% 83.5% 83.5% 85.6% 87.6%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% o

f L

an

e M

ile

s

Percentage of Lane Miles on the SHS having a Condition Rating

of either Excellent or Good (Objective: at least 80%)

PAVEMENT CONDITION

Routine Maintenance

83 83 86 87 86

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Ma

inte

na

nc

e R

ati

ng

Maintenance Rating Achieved on the SHS

(Objective: at least 80)

Capacity Improvements: Highways

2006 2007 2008 2008 2008

% of Plan 86.5% 86.2% 99.4% 106.6% 89.3%

Goal 90.0% 90.0% 90.0% 90.0% 90.0%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Percentage of Lane Miles Added to the State Highway System Compared to the Number Planned:

by Fiscal Year(Objective is at least 90%)

% of Plan

Goal

Capacity Improvements:

Public Transportation

2.26% 2.40%1.80%

1.36% 1.20%

5.29%

4.10%3.25%

2.26%

-5.20%

-6.00%

-4.00%

-2.00%

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Gro

wth

Ra

te

Population

Growth Rate

Transit

Ridership Growth

Commitment of Federal Funds

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% o

f F

un

ds

Co

mm

itte

d

Commitment of Federal Funds by Federal Fiscal Year(Objective is 100%)

Management of Administrative Costs

1.1%1.0%

1.2%1.3% 1.3%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% o

f T

ota

l Pro

gra

m

Administrative Costs as a Percent of the Total ProgramBy Fiscal Year

(Objective is <2%)

Cash Management

State Transportation Trust Fund (STTF)

2009/10 Ending Cash Balance was $312.0 Million or 5.9% of outstanding commitments of $5.318

Billion

Cash Receipts ($=millions) Cash Disbursements ($=millions)

Forecast for FY

2009/10 $5,863.2

Forecast for FY

2009/10 $5,694.2

2009/10 Actual $5,345.7 2009/10 Actual $5,445.4

$ Variance -$517.5 $ Variance -$248.8

% Variance -8.8% % Variance -.4.4%

Minority Business Enterprise Program

$334.2$350.8

$436.8

$346.1

$384.8

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Do

lla

rs in

Mil

lio

ns

(Objective: Year-over-Year Increase in Expenditures)

Management of Toll Facility Operational Costs

13.414.7

16.3

17.3

15.7

0

5

10

15

20

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Cen

ts p

er

Toll

Tran

sact

ion

Operational Cost Per Toll Transaction by Fiscal Year(Objective is <16 Cents)

Cost Per Transaction Goal

Toll Revenue Variance

5.2%

3.6%

4.2%3.7%

3.4%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Re

ven

ue

Va

ria

nce

Ra

teToll Collection Revenue Variance

(Objective is less than or equal to 5%)

Revenue Variance Goal

SunPass Participation

54.4%60.7%

64.2% 67.1% 70.1%

6.5%11.6% 5.8% 4.5% 4.5%

0%

25%

50%

75%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Electronic Toll Collections as a Percent of Total Collections(Objective is at least 75% by June 30, 2012)

% Electronic % Annual Growth Goal

SAFETY

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Fatalities

Motorcyclists

Pedestrians

Bicyclists

Fatality Rate has declined from 1.76 in 2005 to 1.3 in 2009 (per 100 m VMT)

Questions?