performance comparison of php 5.6 vs. 7.0 vs hhvm
TRANSCRIPT
Performance Comparison of PHP 5.6 vs. 7.0 vs
HHVMJani Tarvainen - April 20th 2016
About me - Jani Tarvainen• Working on the web professionally from 2000 in various roles in
development, support operations, management and consulting• By day I help people build the web at eZ Systems• By night I do things at Malloc for fun/profit• On Twitter: @velmu
PHP performance lately• PHP 5.6• Opcode cache built in (since 5.5)
• HHVM 3.x• Increased performance• Facebook's own Hacklang for features
• PHP 7.0• Increased performance and more efficient memory use• New PHP language features
Compatibility• All three are are solid for production use• Symfony achieves 100% PHP7 compatibility• Symfony 2.3 achieves 100% HHVM compatibility• PHP 7 feature support in HHVM
Benchmark case• Done using a full Symfony2 framework application - eZ Platform demo• A few page loads and REST API calls used• Tests done on dedicated VPSes, repeated 3 times and averages
reported• Details: Symfony Benchmarks: PHP 5.6, HHVM 3.11 and PHP 7.0.1
Benchmark case - Frontpage
Benchmark case - Top Stories
Benchmark case - Projects
Benchmark case - REST API Call
Memory usage and Response Time - Load Frontpage with empty runtime and Symfony caches
Memory usage and Response Time - Load Frontpage with empty runtime and Symfony caches
Memory usage and Response Time - Load Top Stories page
Memory usage and Response Time - Load Top Stories page
Memory usage and Response Time - Load Projects page
Memory usage and Response Time - Load Projects page
Memory usage and Response Time - Load Frontpage
Memory usage and Response Time - Load Frontpage
Requests served per second - Frontpage without Symfony Reverse Proxy
Requests served per second - Frontpage with Symfony Reverse Proxy
Requests served per second - API without Symfony Reverse Proxy
Requests served per second - API with Symfony Reverse Proxy
Conclusions• From a standing start HHVM can be the slowest (JIT)• HHVM beats PHP 5.6 in memory usage and throughput• PHP 7.0 is the fastest and uses a significantly than 5.6 or HHVM less
memory• When you've got a lot of template processing, etc. the difference
between HHVM and PHP 7.0 closes down, compared to that of the API calls
Adoption• Prebuilt HHVM packages for Ubuntu, Debian• PHP 7.0 available for CentOS/RHEL, Debian• Containers (Docker, etc.) makes runtime packaging easier• PHP 7.0 is default in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, release tomorrow (April 21st)
What should I use?• PHP 5.6 is super safe• HHVM can be a boost for non PHP 7-compatible apps and Hacklang
features• PHP 7.x is the future, I suggest targeting it• Some PHP 7 polyfills available:
New in Symfony 2.8: Polyfill Components
...PHP-PM and PHPFastCGI?• Traditionally PHP boots up from scratch• PHP-PM and PHPFastCGI Running PHP as long running processes• High performance, but introduce memory leak worries, etc• Still work in progress, but stabilising• Details: PHP-FPM vs. PHP-PM (on PHP 7 and HHVM)
Frontpage without Symfony Reverse Proxy
API without Symfony Reverse Proxy
Cool Links• Symfony Benchmarks: Introduction• How Badoo saved one million dollars switching to PHP7• Migrating from PHP 5.6.x to PHP 7.0.x• Wikipedia on HHVM• Running Symfony Applications with PHP-PM or PHPFastCGI• PHP High-Performance - Follow Up with Symfony/Jarves.io and PHP-P
M• Things to consider when developing an application with PHPFastCGI
Questions?
• Thank you!• http://symfony.fi/php-hhvm