persistent organic pollutants and metabolic syndrome; clinical implications hong kyu lee, m.d....
TRANSCRIPT
Persistent organic pollutants and metabolic syndrome;
Clinical implications
Hong Kyu Lee, M.D.Hong Kyu Lee, M.D.
Bumsuk Prof. of Medicine, Eulji UniversityBumsuk Prof. of Medicine, Eulji University
Prof. Emeritus, Seoul National UniversityProf. Emeritus, Seoul National University
June 2010, KSMRM, Korea
Lee HK et al. BBA General Subject 2010Kwak SH et al. J Diab Invest 2010 (in press)
1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 20010
10
20
30
Diabetes
Infection
IHD
Year
Dea
th R
ate
per
100,
000
po
pu
lati
on
Death rate per 100,000 population
Data source: Korea National Statistical Office http://www.nso.go.kr
Diabetes epidemic in Korea
Obesity and Diabetes in the Developing World — A Growing Challenge. Why?
Hossain P, Kawar, B, and Nahas ME. NEJM 356:213-215 2007
Short history of search for cause
1. Yallow and Berson found high serum insulin in type 2 diabetes, thus insulin resistance : common underlying biochemical abnormality
2. Molecular approach (insulin receptor and post-receptor mechanisms) was not successful
3. Epidemiologic approach by establishing a disease entity (syndrome X) proposed by Reaven (1988)
4. WHO experts gave new name; metabolic syndrome (1998)
Underlying cause(s)
DiabetesDiabetes
HypertensionHypertensionObesityObesity
DyslipidemiaDyslipidemiaAtherosclerosisAtherosclerosis
Syndrome X=
Metabolic syndrome
Cause(s)
Concept of metabolic syndrome
Theories on the causes of insulin resistance
1. Genetic cause (thrifty genotype hypothesis. Neel JV, 1962)
2. Fetal malnutrition (thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Barker DJP and Hales CN, 1992)
3 Mitochondrial dysfunction (Lee HK et al, 2006)
4. Environmental chemicals (Baillie-Hamilton PF, 2002) and POPs (Lee DH et al, 2006)
Kadowaki T et al. J Clin Invest 116:1784-1792,
2006
Mitochondrial dysfunctionMitotoxins
Why mitochondria in diabetes?(KDA autumn meeting, 1994)
• As genes did not change, something in the environment should have caused it
• Causative agent(s) should be not infectious• Introduced by industrialization/
westernization/ coca-cola-rization?• Diabetogenic drug, streptozotocin damaged
cell as NO donor• Mitochondrion is most vulnerable target of
free radicals
• mtDNA 0.41 +/- 0.06 (n = 12) pmol of 8-OHdG per ug
• nDNA 0.025+/- 0.004 (n = 4)
• 16 times lower level of 8-OHdG in nuclear DNA
• Oxidative damage should leave clue in mtDNA
• What the hell is mitochondria and its DNA?
MH Chung studied OGG at JCC and told me free radical damage is 10 times higher in mtDNA
Richter C, Park JW, Ames BNPNAS USA, 1988
Our studies linking insulin resistance and mitochondrial dysfunction
• mtDNA density decrease precede the development of diabetes in Yochon cohort, 1998
• Medical student cohort (KU Lee et al)• Birth weight and mtDNA density (YY Lee, YA Sung):
thrifty phenotype hypothesis• mtDNA variations and insulin resistance (Asians)
16189 T>C,
haplogroups N9a (resistant)
haplogroups B and F (sensitive)
(In collaboration with M Tanaka et al, K Nanjo et al)
Science, 2003
The association of mitochondrial dysfunction and insulin resistance is
established, but the cause–effect relationship is not. See http://videocast.nih.gov/PastEvent.asp?c=998
Maternal malnutrition
•Low taurine level•Low level of methyl-donors•Depletion of nucleotide pool•Increased oxidative stress
•Genomic imprinting
Poor initial condition of mitochondrial function
Fetal malnutrition
Poor response to insulin action
Beta-cell
Impaired insulin secretion
ncDNA, mtDNA
Environment•Westernized life style
•Aging•Drugs, toxins
Diabetes
Nutr Biochem Review, 2004, NYAS 2005,
Revised 2009
Hypertension Insulin resistance/obesity
Sympathetic overactivity?
CNS/ANS Muscle/Liver
Cognitive function
Neurodegenerative diseases Cancers
Environmental factors causing mitochondrial dysfunction
We looked for a clue in United States• Obesity epidemic is most rampant in
Mississippi valley; agriculture• Mitochondrial toxin(s) in agriculture?• Corn is used in coca cola and fast foods
Known to inhibit respiration of gill of a shellfish
Herbicides inhibit photosystem II Q binding site of chloroplast thylakoid membrane (photosynthesis)
A
BControl Atrazine 3 mg/L
Control Atrazine 3 mg/L
0 1 2 3 4 50
100
200
300
ATZ (0.3mg/L)
350
450
550
650
Control
ATZ (3mg/L)
Months
Bo
dy
wei
gh
t (g
)
High fat diet
Muscle
Hepatocyte
Effect of Chronic Exposure of Atrazine on the Mitochondrial Function and Insulin Resistance in Rats Lim S, Park KS, Cho YM, Lee KU, KimPak YM, Lee HK, (PLoS One, April 13, 2009).
Basal I II & III IV0
100
200DMSOATZ
***
O2 c
on
su
mp
tio
n r
ate
(nm
ole
/min
/mg
pro
tein
)A. Respiration
O2
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n(n
mo
l/ml)
Time
Glu/Mal
Rot Suc/G3P
Anti-A
TMPD/Asc
KCN
DMSOATZ
B
C
II III0
25
50
75
100
125
150DMSOATZ
**
Co
mp
lex
ac
tiv
ity
% c
on
tro
l
pAKT(Thr308)
β-actin
pAKT(Ser473)
AKT
- + - + - +
PBS DMSO ATZ
ins
D
Figure S1. Lim S, KimPak Y et. al. PLoS One, 2009
Atrazine inhibited respiration of mouse liver
Atrazine (3mg/l) Control
Visceral fat - High fat diet group -
Weight = 559 g Weight = 564 g
Theories on the causes of insulin resistance
1. Genetic cause (thrifty genotype hypothesis. Neel JV, 1962)
2. Fetal malnutrition (thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Barker DJP and Hales CN, 1992)
3 Mitochondrial dysfunction (Lee HK et al, 2006)
4. Environmental chemicals (Baillie-Hamilton PF, 2002) and POPs (Lee DH et al, 2006)
BAILLIE-HAMILTON PF. J ALTERNAT COMPLEMENT MED. 8:185–192, 2002
Duk Hee Lee, an epidemiologist was looking for environmental factor(s)
because of elevated gamma glutaryl transferase (GGT) was predictive of
diabetes development.
Reasoned environmental toxins would cause this elevation.
Special thanks for letting me use her slides.
109 109
111
112
114
10
11
12
14 14
5759
64
74
83SBP (mmHg) Insulin, uU/L TG (mg/dl)
103
107
110
116115
LCL-C (mg/dl)54
53 53
51
54HDL-C (mg/dl)
5.7
6
6.2
6.4 6.5WBC(109/L)
Cross-sectional association Cross-sectional association between serum GGT and CVD risk factors II (CARDIA data)between serum GGT and CVD risk factors II (CARDIA data)
GGT
GGT
GGT GGT
GGTGGT
Lee DH, et al. Clin Chem 2003;49:1358-66
1. Pesticides aldrin, chlordane, DDT, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, hexachlorobenzene,
mirex, toxaphene, chlordecone, alpha -hexachlorocyclohexane, beta hexachlorocyclohexane, lindane, pentachlorobenzene),
2. Industrial chemicals hexachlorobenzene, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hexabromobiphenyl,
hexabromodiphenyl ether and heptabromodiphenyl ether, pentachlorobenzene, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, its salts and perfluorooctane sulfonyl fluoride, tetrabromodiphenyl ether and pentabromodiphenyl ether
3. By-products hexachlorobenzene; polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDF), and PCBs, alpha hexachlorocyclohexane, beta hexachlorocyclohexane and pentachlorobenzene].
1. Pesticides aldrin, chlordane, DDT, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, hexachlorobenzene,
mirex, toxaphene, chlordecone, alpha -hexachlorocyclohexane, beta hexachlorocyclohexane, lindane, pentachlorobenzene),
2. Industrial chemicals hexachlorobenzene, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hexabromobiphenyl,
hexabromodiphenyl ether and heptabromodiphenyl ether, pentachlorobenzene, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, its salts and perfluorooctane sulfonyl fluoride, tetrabromodiphenyl ether and pentabromodiphenyl ether
3. By-products hexachlorobenzene; polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDF), and PCBs, alpha hexachlorocyclohexane, beta hexachlorocyclohexane and pentachlorobenzene].
NHANES 1999-2002 had measured about 50 POPs in a random sample of US population
Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (PCDFs)Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (PCDFs) Dioxin-like PCBsDioxin-like PCBs Non-dioxin-like PCBsNon-dioxin-like PCBs Organochlorine PesticidesOrganochlorine Pesticides
POPs which were detected among POPs which were detected among 80% of subjects 80% of subjects
• 2,2’,4,4’,5,5’-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB153) : 2,2’,4,4’,5,5’-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB153) : banned banned • 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin• 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin• oxychlordane : oxychlordane : bannedbanned• p,p’-DDE : p,p’-DDE : bannedbanned• trans-nonachlor : trans-nonachlor : bannedbanned
Adjusted odds ratios of prevalent diabetes according to categories of sum of 6 POPs
1
14 14.7
38.3 37.7
05
10152025303540
>25% 25-<50%
50-<75%
75-<90%
90%+
Sum of 6 POPs
Adjusted odds ratio
Lee DH, et al. Diabetes Care 2006
Interaction between obesity and POPs on the risk of prevalent diabetes
Lee DH, et al. Diabetes Care 2006
0
5
10
15
20
25
3035
40
45
<25 25-29 >=30
G1G2
G3G4
G5
Body mass index
Sum of 6 POPs
Prevalence of diabetes (%)
Lee DH et al. Diabetes Care 2007;30:622-8
Association between POPs and HOMA-IR among non-diabetics
OC pesticides / some PCBsOC pesticides / some PCBs
Association between POPs and 5 components of metabolic syndrome among non-diabetics
WaistWaistcircumferencecircumference
HighHighbloodblood
pressurepressure HighHighfastingfastingglucoseglucose
ElevatedElevatedtriglyceridetriglyceride
LowLowHDL-cholesterolHDL-cholesterol
OC pesticidesOC pesticidesPCBsPCBs
DioxinsDioxinsFuransFurans
Lee DH, et al. Diabetologia (2007)
Diabetes Care 31:1574–1579, 2008
Environmental Research 108: 63– 68, 2008
Diabetologia 51:1416-22, 2008
Diabetologia 53:899-906, 2010
• This association was confirmed in Greenland (Inuit), Taiwan, Japan, Native American, Slovakia and Belgium (Dirink E et al. Obesity, 2010).
• An environment-wide association study (EWAS) on type 2 diabetes mellitus supported (Chirag J et al, PLoS One 2010)
• Confirmed in experimental studies (Lim S, PLoS One, 2009; Ruzzin J et al, Environ Health Persp, 2009)
Association between POPs (causative agent) and metabolic syndrome (disease phenotype) is
established.
Does exposure to POPs cause insulin resistance?
1. National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), Norway.2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark. 3. INSERM U-870, University, INSA Lyon and Hospices Civils, France.4. Others
METHODS: 1. Wistar rats exposed for 28 days to lipophilic POPs (high-fat diet containing crude fish oil obtained from farmed Atlantic salmon). 2. Measured body weight, whole-body insulin sensitivity, POP accumulation, lipid and glucose homeostasis, gene expression and performed microarray analysis.
RESULTS: Rats exposed to crude, but not refined, salmon oil developed insulin resistance, abdominal obesity and hepatosteatosis.
Ruzzin J et al. Environment Health Perspect. Nov. 2009
Endocrine Disruptor, dioxin (TCDD)–Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Apoptosis
in Human Trophoblast-Like JAR CellsSu-Chee Chen et al. Hum Reprod, 2010
• 2.58x increase in lipid peroxides (2 nM TCDD, 4 hrs). • DNA damage marker, 8-OH-dG increased with and increase in mtDNA deletions.• Reduction in mtDNA copy number and ATP content• Increased apoptosis, p53 accumulation, Bax over-expression, cytochrome c release, and sequential caspase 3 activation after TCDD exposure.
The Mitochondrion — A Trojan Horse That Kicks Off Inflammation?
Manfredi, AA, Patrizia Rovere-Querini, P NEJM 362;2133, 2010
DAMP denotes damage-associated molecular pattern,PRR pattern-recognition receptor
Mitochondrial damage
Lee HK et al. BBA General Subject Mar 2010. Ruzzin J et al. Environment Health Perspect.
Nov. 2009
cholesterol
POPs or Mitotoxs
DiabetesDiabetes
HypertensionHypertensionObesityObesity
DyslipidemiaDyslipidemiaAtherosclerosisAtherosclerosis
Syndrome X=
Metabolic syndrome
Cause(s)
Concept of metabolic syndrome
Chemical substances that persist in the environment, bio-accumulate through the food
web, and pose a risk of health and the environment.
What should we give to “chemical substances causing
metabolic syndrome”?
Dioxins and POPs are known as endocrine disruptors, but also affect mitochondria
XenobioticsPersistent organic pollutants
Obesogens
Carcinogens
Mitochondrial toxins vs
Metabogens?
Endocrine disruptors
Hypertensiongens
Grun F, Blumberg B. Endocrine disrupters as obesogens. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2009;304:19–29.
Works to be done
• Establishing cause-effect relationship between xenobiotics exposure and MS
• 3 Koch’s postulates
• Etiologic treatment: drug development and clinical trials
To establish cause-effect relationship between POPs and MS
• POPs are very diverse, small, slowly act, dangerous to handle and ---
• Current detecting methods are too expensive• Need cheap and valid method (for diagnosis):
i.e. CALUX (chemically activated luciferase expression) assay
• Best way to eliminate toxins (evidence-based detoxification therapy)
How should we treat patients with metabolic syndrome?
1. Avoid and remove toxins (xenical, colestimide, activated charcoal, herbs?)2. Recover mitochondrion already damaged (stem cell therapy)3. Current treatment methods- need re-evaluation
Blood concentrations of POPs like p,p′-DDE increase with age.
(a) New Zealand report conducted in 1996–97 (N=1834) and the Canary Islands study in 1997–1998 (N=682),(b) East & West Ger III conducted in 1998 (N=2290 for West Germany and N=534 for East Germany),
Porta M et al. Environment International
34 (2008) 546–561
Environment•Westernized
life style•Aging•Drugs
•Mito-toxins
Acknowledgements
• Park KS, Cho YM, Lim S, KimPak Y, Lee W, and many collaborators, Korea
• Wei Y-H, Taiwan
• Nanjo K, Tanaka M. Japan
• Members of Molecular Diabetology in Asia