phase i environmental site assessment - loopnet · 2020-02-14 · phase i environmental site...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment GONZAGA – MATER DEI INSTITUTE
400-424 East Mission Avenue, 1420 North Astor Street, 405-411 East Sinto Avenue, Spokane, Washington
10 January 2020 AGE Project No. 19-4967
PREPARED FOR:
Mr. Nate Greene Gonzaga – Mater Dei Institute
PREPARED BY:
Environmental • Compliance • Industrial Hygiene • Geotechnical
Phone: 800-511-9300 Fax: 888-445-8786
www.advancedgeo.biz
“Working in Partnership with People, Business and the Environment”
http://www.advancedgeo./http://www.advancedgeo./
-
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment GONZAGA – MATER DEI INSTITUTE
400-424 East Mission Avenue, 1420 North Astor Street, 405-411 East Sinto Avenue, Spokane, Washington
10 January 2020 AGE Project No. 19-4967
Environmental • Compliance • Industrial Hygiene • Geotechnical Phone: 800-511-9300
Fax: 888-445-8786 www.advgeoenv.com
“Working in Partnership with People, Business and the Environment”
PREPARED BY:
________________________________________ Timothy J. Cuellar Senior Geologist
________________________________________ Robert E. Marty President
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________________________ Robert D. Loeffler Senior Geologist/Vice President State of Washington Licensed Geologist No. 2751 Registered Environmental Property Assessor No. 136161
blocked::blocked::http://www.advgeoenv.com/blocked::blocked::http://www.advgeoenv.com/
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1..................................................................................................1.0. INTRODUCTION 3.......................................................................................................
1.1. PURPOSE 3..............................................................................................................1.2. SITE DESCRIPTION 4..............................................................................................
1.2.1. Location and Legal Description 4.......................................................................1.2.2. Site and Vicinity General Characteristics 5.........................................................1.2.3. Current Use of Property 5...................................................................................1.2.4. Proposed Use of Property 5...............................................................................1.2.5. Property Utilities 5...............................................................................................
1.3. DETAILED SCOPE-OF-SERVICES 5.......................................................................1.4. SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS 5.............................................................................1.5. LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS 6.........................................................................1.6. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 6...................................................................1.7. USER RELIANCE 7..................................................................................................
2.0. USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 7...........................................................................3.0. RECORDS REVIEW 8..................................................................................................
3.1. HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION 8........................................................................3.1.1. Historical Use Information on Subject Property 8...............................................
3.1.1.1. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps 8.................................................................3.1.1.2. Aerial Photographs 9..................................................................................3.1.1.3. Historical Topographic Maps 10.................................................................3.1.1.4. Street Directories 10...................................................................................3.1.1.5. Building Department Records 13...............................................................3.1.1.6. Assessor's Records 15...............................................................................3.1.1.7. Previous Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 16....................
3.1.2. Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties 16.......................................3.2. PHYSICAL SETTING 16...........................................................................................3.3. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES 18.......................................
3.3.1. SUBJECT PROPERTY DATABASE SEARCH 18...............................................3.3.2. SITE VICINITY DATABASE SEARCH 18............................................................
3.4. ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY RECORD SOURCES 20.....................3.4.1. Additional Subject Property Record Sources 21.................................................3.4.2. Additional Site Vicinity Record Sources 21.........................................................
3.5. PROVIDED SUBJECT PROPERTY RECORDS 21..................................................3.6. VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND VAPOR ENCROACHMENT 22........................
4.0. SITE RECONNAISSANCE 22......................................................................................4.1. METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 22................................................4.2. GENERAL SITE SETTING 22...................................................................................4.3. EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS 24....................................................
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
5.0. MATERIAL STORAGE 25............................................................................................6.0. INTERVIEWS 25...........................................................................................................7.0. BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS - NON-ASTM SERVICES 25.........................
7.1. MOLD 25...................................................................................................................7.2. ASBESTOS CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS 26............................................7.3. LEAD-BASED PAINT 26...........................................................................................7.4. RADON 26................................................................................................................7.5. WETLANDS 27..........................................................................................................7.6. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE 27.............................................................................
8.0. EVALUATION 27..........................................................................................................8.1. DATA GAPS AND LIMITATIONS 27...........................................................................8.2. FINDINGS 28............................................................................................................
8.2.1. Business Environmental Risk 28........................................................................8.2.2. De Minimis Conditions 28...................................................................................8.2.3. Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions 28..........................................8.2.4. Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions 28.........................................8.2.5. Recognized Environmental Conditions 28..........................................................
9.0. CONCLUSIONS AND OPINION 28.............................................................................10.0. SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS 29..................................11.0. QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS 29...........................12.0. REFERENCES 29......................................................................................................
FiguresFigure 1 - Location MapFigure 2 - Site Plan
Appendices
Appendix A - Photographs of the Subject PropertyAppendix B - Historical DocumentsAppendix C - Regulatory Records Documentation (with EDR DatabaseSearches)Appendix D - Interview DocumentationAppendix E - Miscellaneous DocumentsAppendix F - Qualifications of the Environmental Professionals
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AdvancedGeo, Inc. conducted this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for theproperty located at 402, 414, 418, 424 East Mission Avenue, 405 and 411 East SintoAvenue and 1420 North Astor Street, Spokane County, Washington (subject propertyor property) in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard PracticeE1527-13, the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for AllAppropriate Inquiries ‘AAI’ (40 CFR Part 312).
PROPERTY USE
The subject properties are located east of North Astor Street, between East MissionAvenue and East Sinto Avenue in the University District of the City of Spokane,Spokane County, Washington. The properties are located immediately north ofGonzaga University and east of North Ruby Street (U.S. 395/U.S. 2). The property iscomprised of seven primary buildings and a garage/storage building. Further propertylocation descriptions, characteristics, improvements and site vicinity characteristics arediscussed below. The property is occupied by The Mater Dei Institute as well as six residential units,affiliated with Gonzaga University. Based on a review of historical documents, the subject property was developed forresidential usage from at late 1890's to the early 1900's. The general residentialbuilding footprints have remained consistent since the early 1900's.
FINDINGS
Based on the standards set by ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, a recognizedenvironmental condition (REC) is the presence or likely presence of any hazardoussubstances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to theenvironment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3)under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.Conditions that are determined to be de minimis, which do not present a threat tohuman health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of anenforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies,are not recognized environmental conditions. Conditions that are considered BusinessEnvironmental Risk include the presence of asbestos-containing materials, lead-basedpaint, mold or moisture conditions, or non-hazardous regulated materials. The standard further identifies historical RECs and controlled RECs. An historical REC(HREC) is a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that hasoccurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction ofthe applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by aregulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. Acontrolled REC (CREC) is a REC resulting from a past release of hazardoussubstances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of theapplicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum productsallowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. The following findings are differentiated below as Business Environmental Risks andde minimis conditions unlikely to be subject to government enforcement, HRECs,CRECs and RECs.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 2 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS This assessment has revealed no evidence of potential Business Environmental Risksin connection with the subject property, except for the following:
• The existing subject property structures were constructed prior to the 1970's.Based on the age of the buildings, the presence of asbestos containing materialsand lead based paint is possible. If any renovation or demolition is planned, AGErecommends performance of a full surveys by licensed consultants.
DE MINIMIS CONDITIONS This assessment revealed no evidence of potential or de minimis conditions inconnection with the subject property. HISTORICAL RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION This assessment has revealed no evidence of HRECs in connection with the subjectproperty. CONTROLLED RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION This assessment has revealed no evidence of CRECs in connection with the subjectproperty. RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with the subjectproperty.
CONCLUSIONS AND OPINION
AdvancedGeo, Inc. has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment inconformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13, US-EPA AAIfor the property located at 402, 414, 418, 424 East Mission Avenue, 405 and 411 EastSinto Avenue and 1420 North Astor Street, Spokane, WA. It is the opinion of theenvironmental professionals that the findings and conclusions presented in this reportare reasonable and prudent, given the evidence as presented. AGE did not identify anyREC’s on the subject property during the course of the Phase I. AGE has norecommendations for additional investigations at the subject property at this time.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 3
1.0. INTRODUCTION
AdvancedGeo, Inc. (AGE) has been retained by Gonzaga - Mater Dei Institute toperform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I) of the properties locatedat 402, 414, 418, 424 East Mission Avenue, 1420 North Astor Street, 405 and 411 EastSinto AvenueSpokane , Spokane County, Washington (hereafter referred to as subjectproperty or property). The Phase I was performed in conformance with the scope andlimitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, the Environmental Protection AgencyStandards and Practices for ‘All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI)’ (40 CFR Part 312). ThePhase I is designed to provide the Client (user) with an assessment concerningenvironmental conditions (limited to those issues identified in the report) as they existat the subject property.
1.1. PURPOSE
The purpose of the Phase I is to identify and assess environmental characteristics ofthe subject property that could lead to liability in the event of ownership, that couldhave a potential impact on property value or that could impact the present or future useof the subject property. The purpose of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and USEPA AAI is to define goodcommercial and customary practice for conducting an environmental site assessmentof a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants withinthe scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and LiabilityAct (CERCLA) and petroleum products. As such, this practice is intended to permit auser to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner,contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLAliability: that is, the practice that constitutes all appropriate inquiries into the previousownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial and customarypractice as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35)(B). An evaluation of businessenvironmental risk associated with a parcel of commercial real estate may necessitateinvestigation beyond that identified in this practice (based on ASTM PracticeE1527-13). The goal of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 is to identify recognized environmentalconditions (RECs) in connection with the subject property. A REC is defined as thepresence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on,or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicativeof a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of afuture release to the environment. Conditions that are determined to be de minimis,which do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generallywould not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention ofappropriate governmental agencies, are not recognized environmental conditions. The standard further identifies historical RECs and controlled RECs. An historical REC(HREC) is a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that hasoccurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction ofthe applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by aregulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. Acontrolled REC (CREC) is a REC resulting from a past release of hazardoussubstances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of theapplicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum productsallowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 4
1.2. SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject properties are located east of North Astor Street, between East MissionAvenue and East Sinto Avenue in the University District of the City of Spokane,Spokane County, Washington. The properties are located immediately north ofGonzaga University and east of North Ruby Street (U.S. 395/U.S. 2). The property iscomprised of seven primary buildings and a garage/storage building. Further propertylocation descriptions, characteristics, improvements and site vicinity characteristics arediscussed below.
1.2.1. Location and Legal Description
The subject property location can be identified as the following:
Site Address(es) 1) 402 East Mission Avenue
2) 414 East Mission Avenue
3) 418 East Mission Avenue
4) 424 East Mission Avenue
5) 405 East Sinto Avenue
6) 411 East Sinto Avenue
7) 1420 North Astor Street
Assessor's Parcel
Number(s) (APN)
1) 35172.0305
2) 35172.0304
3) 35172.0303
4) 35172.0302
5) 35172.0307
6) 35172.0308
7) 35172.0306
Property Owner Mater Dei Institute
Land Use Type Residential
Zoning Not Listed
Legal Description 402 E. Mission Ave: SINTO 2ND N92FT OF L5&A B20
414 E. Mission Ave: SINTO 2ND L4 B20
418 E. Mission Ave: SINTO 2ND L3 B20
424 E. Mission Ave: SINTO 2ND L2 B20
405 E. Sinto Ave: SECOND SINTO ADD LT B & LT 6 BKL 20
411 E. Sinto Ave: SINTO 2ND L7 B20
1420 N. Astor St: SINTO 2ND S50FT L5&A B20
Size of Property 1) 0.21 Acres
2) 0.16 Acres
3) 0.16 Acres
4) 0.16 Acres
5) 0.33 Acres
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 5 Size of Property 6) 0.16 Acres
7) 0.11 Acres
The parcel map and owner information were obtained from the Spokane CountyAssessor's Office webpage. Copies of the parcel map and the owner information areprovided in Appendix B.
1.2.2. Site and Vicinity General Characteristics
The subject property is located within a residential area of the City of Spokane,Spokane County, Washington. Figure 1 shows the setting of the subject property (7.5Minute United States Geological Survey [USGS] Topographic Series, Spokane NWQuadrangle, Washington). Photographs of the subject property are provided inAppendix A.
1.2.3. Current Use of Property
The property is occupied by The Mater Dei Institute as well as six residential units,affiliated with Gonzaga University.
1.2.4. Proposed Use of Property
It is AGE’s understanding that the proposed future property use is single-family andmulti-family residential.
1.2.5. Property Utilities
Current and known historic utilities serving the subject property are summarized in thefollowing table:
Potable Water Source City of Spokane
Sanitary Sewer Utility City of Spokane
Storm Drain Utility City of Spokane
Electric Utility Avista
Natural Gas Utility Avista
1.3. DETAILED SCOPE-OF-SERVICES
Except where identified in Section 8.1., the scope of work for this Phase I conforms toASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and the USEPA AAI (40 CFR Part 312). Anyadditional User requested scope of services are discussed in Section 7.0.
1.4. SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS
Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarilyexercised by environmental consultants practicing in this or similar fields. Findingswere based mainly upon examination of historical records, maps, aerial photographsand government agency lists, on a site reconnaissance visit, and on information
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 6 obtained during personal interviews with persons of long term familiarity with thesubject property as specified in ASTM E1527-13 and the USEPA AAI. Hazardouswaste site lists presented in this report represents only a search of specific governmentrecords as listed below. AGE is aware additional government records may exist. Itshould be noted that government agencies often do not list all sites with environmentalcontamination or that the list could be inaccurate and/or incomplete. Groundwater flow and depth to groundwater, unless otherwise specified by on-site welldata, or well data from adjacent sites, are assumed based on geologic interpretationsfrom available sources. AGE assumes the property has been correctly and accuratelyidentified by the client, designated representative of the client, property contact,property owner, and property owner’s representatives.
1.5. LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS
Property conditions, as well as local, state, tribal and federal regulations can changesignificantly over time. Therefore, the recommendations and conclusions presented asa result of this study apply strictly to the environmental regulations and propertyconditions existing at the time the study was performed. Available information hasbeen analyzed using currently accepted assessment techniques and it is believed thatthe inferences made are reasonably representative of the property. AGE makes nowarranty, expressed or implied, except that the services have been performed inaccordance with generally accepted environmental property assessment practicesapplicable at the time and location of the study. Considerations identified as beyond the scope of an ASTM Phase I that may affectbusiness environmental risks at a property include the following: asbestos-containingmaterials (ACMs); biological agents; cultural and historic resources; ecologicalresources; endangered species; health and safety; indoor air quality unrelated toreleases of hazardous substances or petroleum products into the environment;industrial hygiene; lead-based paint (LBP); lead in drinking water; mold; radon;regulatory compliance; and wetlands. These environmental issues may warrantassessment based on the type of property or transaction, however, they areconsidered non-scope issues under ASTM Practice E1527-13. Any addition ofnon-scope items must be agreed upon between the user and AGE prior to initiation ofthe Phase I. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is not, and should not be construed as, awarranty or guarantee about the presence or absence of environmental contaminantsthat may affect the property. Neither is the assessment intended to assure clear title tothe property in question. The sole purpose of investigation into property title records isto ascertain a historical basis of prior land use. All findings, conclusions, andrecommendations stated in this report are based upon facts, circumstances, andindustry-accepted procedures for such services as they existed at the time this reportwas prepared (i.e., federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, market conditions,economic conditions, political climate, and other applicable matters). All findings,conclusions, and recommendations stated in this report are based on the data andinformation provided, and observations and conditions that existed on the date andtime of the property visit.
1.6. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
There were no special terms or conditions, agreed upon by the environmentalprofessional, beyond the initial agreed upon scope of work, used in preparation of thisreport.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 7
1.7. USER RELIANCE
Conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on findings regardinghistorical use of the site, and on features noted during the site reconnaissance. Theabsence of any potential gross contamination sources, historic or present, does notnecessarily imply that the site is free of any contamination. This report only representsa ‘due diligence’ effort as to the current environmental status of the site. No otherwarranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional recommendationscontained in this report.
2.0. USER PROVIDED INFORMATION
According to the ASTM Standard E1527-13 and the USEPA AAI, in order to qualify forone of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) to CERCLA liability offered by theSmall Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001, the client(user) must provide to the environmental professional the following information (ifavailable) in relation to the subject property:
Title Records A review of Title Records was not requested by the user.
Environmental Liens or
Activity and Use
Limitations
An environmental lien or AUL's (activity and usage limitations) search was not
requested by the user.
Specialized Knowledge AGE was not provided any specialized knowledge by the user and does have
not any specialized knowledge of this property outside of what is contained in
this report. The property ownership and tenants as well as all individuals who
were interviewed as part of this investigation, have not reported any
specialized knowledge of this property outside of what is contained in this
report.
Commonly Known or
Reasonably
Ascertainable Information
The user provided no commonly known or reasonably ascertainable
information available within the local community about the subject property
that is material to recognized environmental conditions in connection with the
property.
Valuation Reduction for
Environmental Issues
No property valuation reduction related to environmental issues or concerns
was reported by the user.
Owner, Property
Manager, and Occupant
Information
No written or verbal communication with the property owner, manager and/or
occupant revealed any information which suggested that there are currently or
historically any recognized environmental conditions associated with the
subject property not noted in this assessment.
Reason for Performing
Phase I
Potential property transaction
Other No modifications to the ASTM E1527-13 standard scope-of-services were
requested by the user for special circumstances that might be encountered at
the subject property. Any additional user requested scope of services are
discussed in Section 7.0.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 8 Failure to provide the above information could result in a determination that ‘allappropriate inquiries’ are not complete. Additional items should be collected, ifavailable, and provided to AGE.
3.0. RECORDS REVIEW
The purpose of obtaining and reviewing subject property and site vicinity historical,physical setting, and regulatory records is to help identify recognized environmentalconditions in connection with the subject property.
3.1. HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION
The objective of consulting historical sources for a Phase I is to develop a history ofprevious uses of the property and surrounding area to help identify the likelihood ofpast uses having led to recognized environmental conditions with respect to theproperty. All obvious uses shall be identified from the present to the property’s firstobvious developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. Review of standardsources at less than five year intervals is not required.
3.1.1. Historical Use Information on Subject Property
Subject property history was researched by reviewing historical Sanborn FireInsurance Maps, aerial photographs, topographic maps, telephone directoryinformation, the Building Dept name records, and the Spokane County Assessor’sOffice records. Based on a review of historical documents, the subject property was developed forresidential usage from at late 1890's to the early 1900's. The existing residentialbuildings have been located at the site since the early 1900's. In summary, review of the historical documents revealed no features on the subjectproperty of environmental concern. Representative historical records are providedwithin Appendix B.
3.1.1.1. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
Sanborn Fire Insurance maps were developed in the late 1800s and early 1900s foruse as an assessment tool for fire insurance rates in urbanized areas but are nowutilized as a valuable source of historical and environmental risk information. EDRowns the largest collection of Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. AGE requested EDR toprovide any Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps that might cover the subject property.Sanborn maps from the years 1891, 1902, 1910, 1950, 1952, 1957, 1959, 1960, 1965,1968, 1969, 1970 and 1980 were reviewed. The following is AGE's review of theSanborn Maps.
Year(s) Subject Property Surrounding Area
1891 No coverage for the subject property. No coverage to the North, South, East or
West. However, the parcels to the northwest
depict parcels developed with 1.5-story and
2-story buildings.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 9
Year(s) Subject Property Surrounding Area
1902 Five parcels developed with residential
dwellings (402, 414 E. Mission Avenue,
1420 N. Astor Street, 403, 411 E. Sinto
Avenue).
Mission Avenue to the north, Sinto Avenue
to the south, Astor Stree to the west and
Addison Street to the east. Residential
buildings located further north, south, east
and west.
1910 Six parcels developed with residential
dwellings (402, 414, 418 E. Mission Avenue,
1420 N. Astor Street, 403, 411 E. Sinto
Avenue).
Mission Avenue to the north, Sinto Avenue
to the south, Astor Stree to the west and
Addison Street to the east. Residential
buildings located further north, south, east
and west.
1950, 1952, 1957,
1959, 1960, 1965,
1968, 1969, 1980
Seven parcels developed with residential
dwellings and detached garages (402, 414,
418, 424 E. Mission Avenue, 1420 N. Astor
Street, 403, 411 E. Sinto Avenue).
Two-story apartment building identified at
418 E. Mission. A Sister's
Residence/Covenant was identified at 403
E. Sinto.
Mission Avenue to the north, Sinto Avenue
to the south, Astor Stree to the west and
Addison Street to the east. Residential
buildings located further north, south, east
and west.
A review of historical Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps did not reveal any items ofenvironmental concern in connection with the subject property.
3.1.1.2. Aerial Photographs
AGE reviewed aerial photographs of the subject property and surrounding area thatwere provided by EDR as well reviewed online (Google Earth) for the years 1938,1946, 1953, 1962, 1972, 1977, 1982, 1991, 1995, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2009,2011, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. The following is a summary of ourreview of the aerial photographs:
Year(s) Subject Property Surrounding Area
1938, 1946, 1953,
1962, 1972, 1977,
1982, 1991, 1995,
2002, 2003, 2005,
2006, 2009, 2011,
2013, 2015, 2016,
2017, 2018 and 2019
The subject property (SP) contains at least
seven (7) residential dwellings. An alleyway
is located in the middle of the subject
property which connects to Addison Street
and Astor Street.
Mission Avenue borders the subject property
(SP) to the north, Astor Street toward the
west, and Sinto Avenue toward the south.
Residential properties are located further
north, south, east and west.
A review of historical aerial photographs did not reveal any items of environmentalconcern in connection with the subject property.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 10
3.1.1.3. Historical Topographic Maps
AGE reviewed historical topographic maps of the subject property and surroundingarea that were supplied by EDR for the years 1901, 1911, 1950, 1963, 1973, 1974,1986 and 2014. The following is a summary of our review of the topographic maps:
Year(s) Subject Property Surrounding Area
1901, 1911 No features were evident on the subject
property.
Roadways bordered the north, south and
west of the subject property (SP).
Residential properties were located further
north, south, east and west of the SP.
1950, 1963, 1973,
1974, 1986, 2014
No features were evident on the subject
property.
Mission Avenue is located north of the
subject property (SP); Astor Street is located
west of the SP; an unmarked roadways
borders the SP to the south. St. Aloysius
school is located further northeast, Webster
School further southeast and Gonzaga
University further south-southeast. Gonzaga
River is depicted approximately 1/2 mile
further south of the SP.
A review of historical topographic maps did not reveal any items of environmentalconcern in connection with the subject property.
3.1.1.4. Street Directories
AGE requested that EDR provide a review of city and street directories to determinethe occupancy history of the property for the years 1964, 1967, 1970, 1975, 1980,1984, 1989, 1992, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2014. The following is a summary ofthe city directory search:
Year(s) Directory Listing Summary
2014 414 E. Mission Ave - Guoming Chen
418 E. Mission Ave - Rosalyn R Helton, Diane Imes
405 E. Sinto Ave - Jean Guibi
411 E. Sinto Ave - Phillip Drees, Chui Pak
1420 N. Astor St - Mater Dei
2010 414 E. Mission Ave - Guoming Chen, Charles Braunger, Josh Czoski, Jason Hiner,
John Troman, Jian Yin
418 E. Mission Ave - Rosalyn R Helton, Haruko Aoki, Leah Davis, H Lu, Wenshu
Tsai
424 E. Mission Ave - Chenyu Nan, Linda Olson, Juliet Padernal
405 E. Sinto Ave - Mater Dei Institute
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 11
Year(s) Directory Listing Summary
411 E. Sinto Ave - Sarra Arras, Shizuko Kogawa
1420 N. Astor St - Mater Dei, Scarlett Smallwood
2005 402 E. Mission Ave - Bob Troman
414 E. Mission Ave - JG Fyffe, Jason Hiner, Hideki Taguchi, John Troman,
418 E. Mission Ave - Haruko Aoki, H Liu, Wenshu Tsai, Miho Asahi, Eri Kato, Lee
Price, R. Sippel, Yukari Yasuda
424 E. Mission Ave - Rosemarie Krebbs, CA Lindsey, Quyen Phan, Jennifer
Scarpaci
405 E. Sinto Ave - Mater Dei Institute, Jeff Brown, Jui Chang, Marco Cristerna, Leon
Desjardais, Theordore Fisher, Dan Galbreath, Don Graham, Brad Jarvis, Jaeyong
Ko, Richard Mayo, Robert Morgan, Ching Ni, Gaurav Sharma, John Uggetti, Brian
Unthank
411 E. Sinto Ave - Sarra Arras, Shizuko Kogawa
1420 N. Astor St - Mater Dei, Genevra Cavanaugh, John Ennis, Marcella Garza, Lisa
Webster
2000 402. E. Mission Ave - Bob Troman
414 E. Mission Ave - Hiner Jonas, Nate Meyers
418 E. Mission Ave - Gina Costello, Li Ge, X Hu, Akiko Kohara, H Kou, Robyn
Russell, M Susantio, Yong Zhang
424 E. Mission Ave - G Colina, Lydia Hales, R Muchaunguzi
405 E. Sinto Ave - Mater Dei Seminary
411 E. Sinto Ave - Kyle Bergstedt, Eric Gorger, JC Nardo, Kyle Perkins, Ronald
Sthilaire, Brian Werst
1420 N. Astor St - Bob Leblanc, A Lulanga, Timothy Marzen, Philip Mbeta, James
Morgante
1995 402 E. Mission Ave - William Zeck
414 E. Mission Ave - Edward Masuako, William Miller
418 E. Mission Ave - D. Fung, Mark Grossman, Akie Minami, David Stoetzel, Jody
Tschritter
405 E. Sinto Ave - Leon Desjardais, E.Faidi, Oscar Figueroa, Danilo Grajales, Paul
Vevik
411 E. Sinto Ave - Cory Harbour, Chinami Ito, Stan Weisbeck, Kiyoaki Yoshida
1420 N. Astor St- Ning Jin, Thuan Mai, Tobin Marsh
1992 402 E. Mission Ave - William Zeck
414 E. Mission Ave - Kerry Crowley, Raymond Seaman
418 E. Mission Ave - Jeanne Carrol, Terry Fortin, Tina Johansen, M.Kingsmith, S.
Smelcer, David Stoetzel, Y. Takenaka, Lily Watson, Hongola Yoon
405 E. Sinto Ave - Leon Desjardais, Ron Eberley, James Radloff, Robert Vansickler
411 E. Sinto Ave - Karl Hageman, Ken Knapp, Momoyo Komoto, Rie Miyamoto,
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 12
Year(s) Directory Listing Summary
Katrina Shahan, Kiyoaki Yoshida
1420 N. Astor St - Samuel Molefe, Todd Norquist
1989 402 E. Mission Ave - W.Zeck
414 E. Mission Ave - Daigle House (Dormitory), Gary Logan
418 E. Mission Ave - Maria Villa (Dormitory), Nolden
424 E. Mission Ave - Donald Rockstrom
405 E. Sinto Ave - Mater Dei Institute, Ron Eberly
411 E. Sinto Ave - Lisa Chiaramonte, Michelle Hardison, Naomi Leiserson,
S.Maginn, Emiio Araki, Imtiaz Haa, Dale Ladenburg
1420 N. Astor St - David Lorhan
1984 402 E. Mission Ave - W. Zeck
414 E. Mission Ave - Smeads
418 E. Mission Ave - Gonzaga University
424 E. Mission Ave - Margaret Rockstrom
405 E. Sinto Ave - Mater Dei Institute
411 E. Sinto Ave - Terry Beasley, Mark Lapham, Dede Dolezal, Jim D'aboy, Andrew
Pasma, Irene Ringwood, Brenda Guinn
1980 402 E. Mission Ave - W.Zeck
418 E. Mission Ave - Maria Villa Res. Hall (Gonzaga University)
424 E. Mission Ave - Margaret Rockstrom
405 E. Sinto Ave - Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary
411 E. Sinto Ave - L. Taplin, L. Steward, J.Sattler, T. Foss
1420 N. Astor St - Cath. McCanna
1975 402 E. Mission Ave - Mary Van Slatte
414 E. Mission Ave - Ben Smead
418 E. Mission Ave - Donald Showalter
424 E. Mission Ave - Marg. Rockstrom
405 E. Sinto Ave - Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary
411 E. Sinto Ave - Rich. Stewart
1420 N. Astor St - Cath. McCanna
1970 402 E. Mission Ave - Helen Conway
414. E. Mission Ave - Ben Smead
418 E. Mission Ave - Donald Showalter
424 E. Mission Ave - Marg. Rockstrom
405 E. Sinto Ave - Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary
411 E. Sinto Ave - J. Sanders
1420 N. Astor St - Eliz. Sullivan, Kath. McCanna
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 13
Year(s) Directory Listing Summary
1967 402 E. Mission Ave - Helen Conway, Loretta Howard
414 E. Mission Ave - Ben Smead
418 E. Mission Ave - Donald Showalter
424 E. Mission Ave - Walter Rockstrom
405 E. Sinto Ave - Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary
1420 N. Astor St - McCana
1964 402 E. Mission Ave - Helen Conway
414 E. Mission Ave - Ben Smead
418 E. Mission Ave - Donald Showalter
424 E. Mission Ave - Walter Rockstrom
405 E. Sinto Ave - St Aloysius Sisters Residence, Sisters of the Holy Names of
Jesus and Mary
411 E. Sinto Ave - LeRoy Kinnie
1420 N. Astor St - Marie Higley, McCanna
A review of historical telephone directory listings of the subject property address didnot reveal any items of environmental concern.
3.1.1.5. Building Department Records
A review of City of Spokane Building Department records are summarized in thefollowing table:
Address Year(s) Summary
402 E. Mission Avenue 1998
1980
1978
1977
1971
1927
1918
1914
1897
Mechanical Permit B9805588: Remodel Gas BBQ & Pipe
Fixture Permit 38442
Electric Permit B6693: Heater Wiring Repairs
Mechanical Permit 30699: Pressure Test Gas Line
Electrical Permit 0219: Alterations to 100 Amp Service
Mechanical Permit 11251: Remove/Replace Oil Furnace
Electrical Permit 29327: Installed 275-gal Furnace
Electrical Permit 33033: Installed Single Phase Service
Mechanical Permit 16558: Install Gas Furnace
Permit 1275: Permission to Connect to City Water Main
Permit 16918: Water Meter Installation
414 E. Mission 1998
1995
1972
1938
1918
Electrical Permit B9800884: Add/Alter Circuits & Panel
Mechanical Permit B9800843: Remodel Gas Furnace & A/C
Plumbing Permit B9800848: Replace Drain Fixture
Remodel Permit B9800257: Kitchen Remodel
Remodel Permit B9510593: Replace Roof
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 14
Address Year(s) Summary
1910
1897
Fixture Permit 21112
Electrical Permit A16506: Wiring Oil Burner
Building Permit 54861: Garage Frame
Mechanical Permit 26426: Replace Furnace
Mechanical Permit 41499: Replace Gas Heater
Building Permit 77684: Add Partitions on 2nd Floor
Permit 1507: Permission to Connect to City Water Main
Permit 15669: Water Meter Installation
418 E. Mission Avenue 2006
1999
1979
1978
1977
1974
1965
1962
1955
1951
Remodel Permit B0611820: Roof Repairs/Resheath
Mechanical Permit B9903554: Gas Furnace, Pipe & A/C Repairs
Electrical Permit 683316: Wiring to Heater
Electrical Permit B38994: 100 Amp Service
Mechanical Permit 24172: Convert Burner
Mechanical Permit 31293: Replace Heater
Electrical Permit 24822: Alter to 200 Amp Service
Mechanical Permit: Install Gas Boiler
Building Permit 21860: Add 6 bedrooms + 2 bathrooms
Plumbing Permit 13113: Plumbing to bath tubs, sinks, basin
Electrical Permit 30134: Altered 200 AMP Service
Electrical Permit 32689: Altered 400 AMP Service
424 E. Mission Avenue 2011
1990
1981
1980
1976
1955
1953
1951
1949
1932
Electrical Permit B1111233: Reroute Garage Feed
Remodel Permit B1111064: Roof Repairs/Resheath
Building Permit 40269: Install Fireplace
Building Permit 97796: Install Parking Garage
Electrical Permit A0953: Install Range-Heater
Electrical Permit B5915: Install Light Fixtures
Electrical Permit B25774: Install Motor
Electrical Permit B41617: Install 100AMP service to dryer
Electrical Permit 16739: Install 200 AMP Service to Heater
Mechanical Permit 8830: Install A/C
Electrical Permit 18400: Electrical to A/C
Building Permit: Siding Repairs
Mechanical Permit 8101160011: Replace Oil Furnace with Gas
Building Permit: Finish upstairs into 1 large room/bathroom
405 E. Sinto Avenue 2015
2013
2007
1996
1989
Boiler Operating Permits B16B01976, B16B01979, B16B10597,
B16B19437, B14B01976, B14B01979, B14B10597, B14B19437,
B12B19437, B12B01976
Mechanical Permit B1303346: Install Gas Water Heater
Electrical Permit B0713420: Wire New Boiler
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 15
Address Year(s) Summary
Electrical Permit B9600613: Change 200 AMP Service
Boiler Permit 2-87--2-89
411 E. Sinto Avenue 2009
2011
1978
1977
1970
1948
1923
1911
Mechanical Permit B1107985: Replace Electric Water Heater
Plumbing Permit B1107984: Remodel Electric Water Heater
Electrical Permit B0901499: Alter Attic Lighting & Install Smoke
Detectors
Remodel Permit B0900829: Roof Repairs, Drywall & Insulation
Electric Permit 27258: Install Light Fixtures
Electric Permit A71300: Wiring to Range/Heater
Plumbing Permit A10723: Install Bath Tub, Wash Basin
Building Permit 21251: Install Parking Garage
Plumbing Permit 11109: Install Bath Tubs/Sinks, Wash Basins
Demolition Permit 17654: demolish 1980 sq ft
Electric Permit 25508: Install 400 AMP Service
Certificate of Occupancy (1978)
Building Permit 18375: 7-Unit Apartment
1420 N. Astor Street 2016
2010
1996
1976
1952
1951
Street Obstruction Permit P16057080: Gas Repairs in Alley
Mechanical Permit B9611694: Replace Gas Furnace
Electrical Permit B9611628: Rewire Existing Structure
Mechanical Permit B9610803: Install Gas Water Heater
Plumbing Permit B9610607: Install Plumbing
Remodel Permit B9610607: 2-Story Addition
Remodel Permit B9610511: 2-story Addition
Gas Line Permit 3371: Pressure Test
Electric Permit 01470: Install Light Fixtures
Mechanical Permit B13110: Repairs to Oil Burner
Electrical Permit 19616: Gas Conversion 24 transformer
Mechanical Permit 9174: Convert Gas Burner
A review of historical public building of the subject property address did not reveal anyitems of environmental concern.
3.1.1.6. Assessor's Records
A review of Spokane County Assessor’s records are summarized in the following table:
Year(s) Summary
1889 414 E. Mission Ave: Construction of a 2,156-square foot, 2-bedroom/2-bath
residential duplex.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 16
Year(s) Summary
1900 402 E. Mission Ave: Construction of a 1,913-square foot residential
2-story/2-bath/5-bedroom dwelling.
1420 N. Astor St: Construction of a 1,419-square foot residential
2-story/2-bath/4-bedroom dwelling.
1905 418 E. Mission Ave: Construction of a 2,197-square foot residential
1.5-story/1-bath/3-bedroom dwelling.
1932 424 E. Mission Ave: Construction of a 1,240-square foot residential
1-story/1-bath/2-bedroom dwelling.
1933 1420 N. Astor St: Construction of a 360-sq. ft. detached parking garage.
1939 414 E. Mission Ave: Construction of a 414-sq. ft. detached parking garage.
1948 402 E. Mission Ave: Construction of a 652-sq. ft. detached parking garage.
1949 424 E. Mission Ave: Construction of a 440-sq. ft. detached parking garage.
1950 405 E. Sinto Ave: Construction of a 5,765-square foot residential 2-story dormatory.
1977 411 E. Sinto Ave: Construction of a 1,536-square foot residential 2-story apartment..
1978 418 E. Mission Ave: Construction of a 792-square foot, 2-bedroom/2-bath residential
duplex.
A review of historical assessor’s records of the subject property address did not revealany items of environmental concern.
3.1.1.7. Previous Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments
No previous Phase I or II Environmental Site Assessments were provided to AGE bythe user and/or property owner during the course of this Phase I.
3.1.2. Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties
Historical use of immediately adjoining properties to the north, south, east and westhas been developed for residential purposes since the early 1900's.
Historical uses of adjoining properties do not appear to be of environmental concern tothe subject property.
3.2. PHYSICAL SETTING
Geology The subject property is situated within the Hillyard Trough, a deep pre-glacial valley
that is located immediately adjacent to bedrock highlands to the east (little Baldy
Orchard Prairie) and west (Five Mile Prairie). The highlands consist of a pre-Tertiary
undifferentiated plutonic and metamorphic basement complex that is overland by the
Miocene Lata Formations, a lacustrine and fluvial formation, that is interbedded with
the Miocene Yakima Basalt. The Hillyard Trough is a glacially carve valley that is
filled with Pleistocene glacio-fluvial deposits. The glacio-fluvial deposits consist
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 17 Geology mainly of bedded sand and gravel with minor amounts of silts, clays and glacial till.
The glacio-fluvial deposits are as thick as 700 feet in the Hillyard Trough (USGS,
1969).
Hydrology The subject property is located on the border of the Little Spokane River Basin and
the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie aquifer. This includes 679 square miles in
northeastern Washington State covering parts of Spokane, Stevens and Pend Oreille
Counties. The groundwater system consists of unconsolidated sedimentary deposits
and isolated, remnant basalt layers overlaying crystalline bedrock. The
Hydrogeologic framework consists of eight Hydrogeologic units: the upper aquifer,
upper confining unit, lower aquifers, lower confining unit, Wanapum basalt unit, Latah
unit, Grande Ronde basalt unit, and bedrock. The upper aquifer is composed mostly
of sand and gravel and varies in thickness with an average thickness of 70 feet. The
upper confining unit is consisted mostly of silts and clays making it have
low-permeability with an average thickness of 100 feet. The lower aquifers unit
consists of localized lenses consisting mostly of sand that occur at depth in various
places in the basin with an average thickness of 50 feet. The lower confining aquifer
consists of mostly silts and clay making it have low-permeability. Average thickness
is 130 feet. The Wanapum basalt unit includes the Wanapum Basalt of the Columbia
River Basalt Group, thin sedimentary interbeds and in some place overlying loess.
The average thickness is 60 feet. The Latah unit consists of silt, clay and sands
making it mostly have low-permeability with an average thickness of 250 feet. The
Grande Ronde unit includes the Grande Ronde Basalt of the Columbia River Basin
Group and sedimentary interbeds with an average thickness of 140 feet.
According to the USGS published document, Ground-Water Flow Model for the
Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer, Spokane County, Washington, and Bonner
and Kootenai Counties, Idaho, groundwater in the Spokane Aquifer flows to the
general west in the vicinity of the subject property. Groundwater is found at depths
between approximately 20 to 25 feet below surface grade.
Topography The property is located at an elevation of approximately 1,914 feet above mean sea
level (MSL), in an area of low topographic relief. Regional slope of the area is toward
the general south-southwest.
Surface Soils EDR provides a report listing dominant soil composition in the general area of the
subject property based on information from the United States Department of
Agriculture's Soil Conservation Service STATSGO (State Soil Geographic Database)
soil maps. Soil surface texture at the subject property consists of soil identified as
AVONVILLE a fine gravelly silt loam in the Class B Hydrogeologic Group which
includes moderate infiltration rates. Corrosion potential of this soil for uncoated steel
is moderate.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 18 Surface Water
Features
There are no surface water features on the subject property. The nearest surface
water feature in the vicinity of the subject property is an unnamed pond at a former
gravel pit, located approximately 800 feet southeast of the property.
Flood Zone The EDR database report shows that the subject property is not located within either
a 100-year or 500-year Flood Zone. This data, available in select counties across the
country, was obtained by EDR from the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) which has maps depicting FEMA-defined 100-year and 500-year flood
zones.
Wetlands The EDR database report shows that the subject property is not located within the
National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the
country, was obtained by EDR from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
3.3. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES
A computer search of federal, state and regional regulatory agency databases wasperformed by Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR), a data retrieval company, toidentify and locate properties in areas of concern that have been reported as sitesknown or suspected to contain underground storage tanks, or to have been the sceneof hazardous materials spills. Additionally, sites permitted to manufacture, utilize,generate, store, treat or dispose of hazardous materials and/or hazardous wastes areidentified and located. A list and description of databases investigated, in compliancewith ASTM E1527-13 and USEPA AAI, is included in EDR Report provided inAppendix C.
3.3.1. SUBJECT PROPERTY DATABASE SEARCH
The property addresses 1420 North Astor Street , Spokane, Washington, were notlisted on any governmental databases within the EDR Report.
3.3.2. SITE VICINITY DATABASE SEARCH
Sites with recognized environmental conditions surrounding the subject property aretypically of concern to the subject property when they are located in an up-gradientdirection from the property with respect to the ground water flow direction. Typically,groundwater would represent the migration medium for contaminants over significantdistances. Sites located in equi-gradient or down-gradient directions from the subjectproperty are less likely to impact the subject property. AGE retained EDR to provide current regulatory database information compiled by avariety of federal and state regulatory agencies. A copy of the complete database isincluded in Appendix C. The following information was obtained:
Regulatory Agency
Database
Appropriate Minimum
Search Distance (AMSD)
Number of Sites within
AMSD
National Priority List 1 0
National Priority List Deletions 1 0
RCRA - Treatment, Storage and
Disposal
0.5 0
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 19
Regulatory Agency
Database
Appropriate Minimum
Search Distance (AMSD)
Number of Sites within
AMSD
RCRA - Large Quantity Generators 0.25 1
RCRA - Small Quantity Generators 0.25 0
Emergency Response Notification
System
0.001 0
Hazardous Materials Information
Reporting System
0.001 0
A Listing of Brownfields Sites 0.5 0
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent
Decrees
1 0
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory
System
0.001 0
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System -
FIFRA (Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA
(Toxic Substances Control Act)
0.001 0
CERCLA Lien Information 0.001 0
PCB Activity Database System 0.001 0
Clandestine Drug Labs 0.001 0
Superfund Enterprise Management
System
0.5 0
MSHA Violation Assessment Data 0.25 0
PCB Transformer Registration
Database
0.001 0
Underground Storage Tank Listing 0.25 0
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System -
FIFRA (Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA
(Toxic Substances Control Act)
0.001 0
Hazardous Sites List 1 8
Confirmed and Contaminated Sites -
No Further Action
0.5 13
Leaking Underground Storage
Tanks Site List
0.5 8
Underground Storage Tank
Database
0.25 0
Aboveground Storage Tank
Locations
0.25 0
Reported Spills 0.001 0
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 20
Regulatory Agency
Database
Appropriate Minimum
Search Distance (AMSD)
Number of Sites within
AMSD
Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites 0.5 2
Drycleaner List 0.25 0
Brownfields Sites Listing 0.5 0
Clandestine Drug Lab Contaminated
Site List
0.001 0
SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch 0.001 0
Asbestos Notification Listing 0.001 0
PFAS Contamination Site Location
Listing
0.5 0
AGE’s review of the referenced databases also considered the potential or likelihood ofcontamination from adjoining and nearby sites. To evaluate which of the adjoining andnearby sites identified in the regulatory database report present an environmental riskto the subject property, AGE considered the following:
• The type of database on which the site is identified;
• The topographic position of the identified site relative to the subject property;
• The direction and distance of the identified site from the subject property;
• Local soil conditions in the subject property area;
• The known or inferred groundwater flow direction in the subject property area;
• The status of the respective regulatory agency-required investigation(s) of theidentified site (if any); and
• Surface and subsurface obstructions and diversions (e.g., buildings, roads, sewer
systems, utility service lines, rivers, lakes and ditches located between theidentified site and the subject property.
Only those sites that are judged to present a potential environmental risk to the subjectproperty and/or warrant additional clarification are further evaluated. Using thereferenced criteria and based on a review of readily available information containedwithin the regulatory database report, AGE did not identify adjacent or nearby sites(e.g. within ¼-mile radius) listed on the regulatory database report that were judged topresent a potential environmental risk to the subject property.
3.4. ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY RECORD SOURCES
In addition to the EDR computer search of federal, state and regional regulatoryagency databases, AGE contacted appropriate regulatory agencies to review recordsregarding the property and surrounding sites identified as having recognizedenvironmental conditions that have the potential to impact the subject property basedon ground water flow direction, distance from the subject property and nature of thereleases causing the environmental condition. Additional agency searches include the following:
• The State of Washington Department of Ecology (DOE) is responsible foroversight of hazardous waste regulations, cleanup of existing contamination,
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 21
pollution prevention and reduction in hazardous waste and toxic materials andidentification of potential new pollutants. The DOE maintains records of industrialviolations for this area and are the lead agencies for the enforcement of the StateUnderground Storage Tank Program and Hazardous Waste Laws for PierceCounty. AGE requested to review any files that were available.
• The DOE also maintains an online computer database, Toxics Cleanup, that
provides listings of closed and active sites related to unauthorized releases ofhydrocarbons as well as solvents, metals, and other materials. For listed sites,online reports are commonly available. AGE reviewed the Toxics Cleanupdatabase for information that may be available for the subject property orsurrounding sites.
• The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) provides an online
computer database, ENVIROFACTS, providing lists of sites listed on multipleUSEPA databases. AGE reviewed the ENVIROFACTS database for anyinformation that may be available.
• The Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) maintains a
geologic information portal website, allowing for the search of oil and gas relatedinformation. AGE reviewed the interactive online map for any oil and gasinformation in the vicinity of the property.
3.4.1. Additional Subject Property Record Sources
The subject property address was searched on the following record sources:
SOURCE SUMMARY
USEPA ENVIROFACTS Property addresses 402, 414, 418, 424 East Mission Ave., 405, 411 East Sinto Ave.,
1420 North Astor St. were not listed on the ENVIROFACTs database.
ECOLOGY Property addresses 402, 414, 418, 424 East Mission Ave., 405, 411 East Sinto Ave.,
1420 North Astor St. were not listed on the Washington DEPARTMENT OF
ECOLOGY database.
SPOKANE CITY FIRE
DEPARTMENT
Property addresses 402, 414, 418, 424 East Mission Ave., 405, 411 East Sinto Ave.,
1420 North Astor St. were not listed as having any records with the SPOKANE CITY
FIRE DEPARTMENT database.
3.4.2. Additional Site Vicinity Record Sources
The Department of Ecology maintain records for, and are responsible for, enforcementof state UST and hazardous waste laws. AGE commonly reviews files for up-gradientsites under active environmental regulation to ascertain the current site status and itspotential to impact the subject property. No sites, under active or past environmentalregulation, were identified by the database search within the required search radius ofpotential concern to the property.
3.5. PROVIDED SUBJECT PROPERTY RECORDS
No records were provided to AGE by the user and/or property owner during the courseof this Phase I.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 22
3.6. VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND VAPOR ENCROACHMENT
The encroachment of hydrocarbon and volatile organic compound (VOC) vapors intosoil pore space occurs when organic chemicals migrate from contaminatedgroundwater or soil into the airspace between soil particles. Some typical organicsinvolved are petroleum based or chlorinated solvents (e.g, BTEX and dry cleaningchemicals). They may have leaked into the groundwater and/or soil from undergroundstorage tanks, or buried waste, or from disposal in septic systems. In compliance with ASTM Standard E2600-15 (Guide for Vapor EncroachmentScreening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions), AGE evaluated thepotential for a Vapor Encroachment Condition (VEC) at the subject property. Based ona VEC screening, it was determined that ‘a VEC does not exist’ at the property. A copyof the AGE-generated Tier 1 VEC screening form is provided within Appendix E.
4.0. SITE RECONNAISSANCE
A subject property site reconnaissance was conducted by an AGE representative on19 December 2019. At the time of the site visit, the weather was cold with a mix of rainand snow. Several inches of snow accumulation were present from recent storms.Primary features of the property are shown in a site plan provided in Figure 2.Photographs of selected features of the subject site are included in Appendix A.
4.1. METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
The exterior of the properties was fully accessible during the reconnaissance; theinterior of the Mater Dei building (405 East Sinto Avenue) was also accessible andinspected. However, the interiors of the remaining units, all residential in nature, werenot inspected.
4.2. GENERAL SITE SETTING
The following is a description of the primary features of the subject property observedat the time of the site visit:
• The property is occupied by seven primary buildings and one storagebuilding/garage:
• 405 East Sinto Avenue is the headquarters and offices of the Ministry
Institute (Mater Dei). The building is a three level (two floors and a basement), concrete block building. The main floor was used for variousoperations and office; the second floor was used primarily for a dormitory;the basement was used primarily for storage, laundry and utilities. A smallcar port is attached to the building on the north side, adjacent to the alley.
• 411 East Sinto Avenue was occupied by the Fuchs Memorial Apartments, a
multi-tenant, three level apartment building.
• 1420 North Astor Street was occupied by Merle Hall, a residential buildingwith 5 private rooms and common areas.
• 402 East Mission Avenue was occupied by a Neville Manor, a residential
building with 4 private rooms and common areas.
• 414 East Mission Avenue was occupied by Daigle House, a residentialbuilding with 7 private rooms and common areas.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 23
• 418 East Mission Avenue was occupied by Villa Maria, a residential buildingwith 11 private rooms and common areas.
• 424 East Mission Avenue was occupied by Fuch’s Mission Cottage, a
residential building with 4 private rooms and common areas.
• A garage/storage building located behind (south) of Fuch’s Mission Cottage,adjacent to an alley.
• The interior of the Ministry Institute building was divided into various office,
meeting rooms, storage rooms (main floor), worship rooms and a dormitory(upper level), and storage, laundry and utility rooms (basement level). A formercoal chute was located at the base of the building, near the northwest corner.
• The residential buildings appeared to be historical in nature, constructed around
1900. All buildings were mostly wood construction, typical of the period.
• An alley bisects the East Sinto Avenue and East Mission Avenue buildings andparcels. Parking for the various residential units is located on both sides of thealley.
• Yards and common areas were either paved or grass-covered, with various
concrete pathways and fences/gates. The following is a description of the property improvements:
Structures Eight total structures:
-405 East Sinto Avenue, headquarters and offices of the Ministry Institute (Mater
Dei). Building is primarily concrete block.
-411 East Sinto Avenue, occupied by the Fuchs Memorial Apartments, a
multi-tenant, three level apartment building.
-1420 North Astor Street, occupied by Merle Hall, a residential building.
-402 East Mission Avenue, occupied by Neville Manor, a residential building.
-414 East Mission Avenue, occupied by Daigle House, a residential building.
-418 East Mission Avenue, occupied by Villa Maria, a residential building.
-424 East Mission Avenue, occupied by Fuch’s Mission Cottage, a residential
building.
-A garage/storage building located behind (south) of Fuch’s Mission Cottage,
adjacent to an alley
Adjoining / Access /
Egress Roads
The property is accessed from various driveways off of East Sinto Avenue, East
Mission Avenue and North Astor Street, as well as from an alley that bisects North
Astor Street, between East Sinto and East Mission Avenues.
Surface Types Building foundations, yards (grass), paved parking, concrete walkways and
landscaping.
Additional Features None observed.
Surface Water None observed
At the time of the site reconnaissance, current uses of adjacent properties included thefollowing:
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 24 North East Mission Avenue was located immediately north, followed by single-family residential buildings.
South East Sinto Avenue was located immediately south, followed by single-family residential buildings.
East Several single-family residential buildings followed by North Addison Street.
West North Astor Street, followed by residential buildings.
Current uses of the adjoining properties do not appear to be of potential environmentalconcern to the subject property.
4.3. EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS
The following was observed at the time of the property reconnaissance:
OBSERVED CONDITION OBSERVED ON/AT SUBJECT PROPERTY
No Pits, ponds or lagoons with respect to waste treatment or disposal
No Stained soil or pavement, patched pavement
No Stressed vegetation (from causes other than insufficient water)
No Fill dirt from unknown source, or contaminated source
No Solid waste (mounds or depressions suggesting waste disposal)
No Waste water / storm water discharged into a drain, ditch or stream
No Wells (abandoned, irrigation, domestic, monitoring or oil and gas)
No Dry wells
No Septic systems or cesspools
No Movement of hazardous materials to adjacent properties
No Hazardous substances and/or petroleum products
No Above-ground storage tanks (ASTs) for storage of petroleum products and/or hazardous
substances
No Underground storage tanks (USTs) for storage of petroleum products and/or hazardous
substances
No Strong, pungent or noxious odors
No Pools of liquid (other than water)
No 55-gallon drum or large sack storage
Unidentified substance containers
No Stains and/or corrosion on floors, walls or ceiling (except water)
No Drains and sumps
No Oil-water separator/clarifier
No Electrical or hydraulic equipment known to contain PCBs
No Obvious signs of possible ACMs
No Obvious signs of mold
No Other areas of environmental concern
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 25
5.0. MATERIAL STORAGE
No current or historic containers, storage vessels, and containment systems (e.g.,clarifiers, oil/water separators, vaults, frac ponds, tanks, drums, storage lockers, silos)of 55 gallons or more for individual containers were observed on the subject propertyor have been historically utilized on the property.
6.0. INTERVIEWS
Interviews performed during the course of this Phase I are described below.
Interviewee Interview Summary
Property Owner Ms. Diane Imes, current property owner, site manager and property occupant,
completed an ASTM compliant questionnaire on 27 December 2019. The following
information was obtained from Ms. Imes in the questionnaire:
- Ms Imes has been associated with Gonzaga - Mater Dei Institute for over 37 years.
Her current position is Administrative Director.
- The main ministry building (405 E. Sinto Ave) was previously utilized by St.
Aloysius as a convent.
- The main ministry building was acquired from St. Aloysius in 1985.
- The other surrounding buildings on the subject property have been utilized for
residences and apartments.
- Ms. Imes is unaware of any environmental concerns at the subject property.
Site Manager No other property site managers were interviewed during the course of this Phase I.
Property Occupant(s) No other property occupants were not interviewed during the course of this
Phase I.
Local Government Officials With the exception of file review requests, no local government officials
were interviewed during the course of this Phase I.
Others No additional interviews were performed during the course of this Phase I.
ASTM-compliant interview/questionnaire documentation is provided as Appendix D.
7.0. BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS - NON-ASTM SERVICES
Additional environmental considerations beyond the scope of the standard ASTMpractice that have the potential to pose business environmental risks are discussedbelow.
7.1. MOLD
Molds are part of the natural environment. Outdoors, molds play a part in nature bybreaking down dead organic matter such as fallen leaves and dead trees, but indoors,mold growth should be avoided. Molds reproduce by means of tiny spores; the sporesare invisible to the naked eye and float through outdoor and indoor air. Mold may begingrowing indoors when mold spores land on surfaces that are wet. There are manytypes of mold, and none of them will grow without water or moisture.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 26 Molds are usually not a problem indoors, unless mold spores land on a wet or dampspot and begin growing. Molds have the potential to cause health problems. Moldsproduce allergens (substances that can cause allergic reactions), irritants, and in somecases, potentially toxic substances (mycotoxins). No areas of moisture intrusion or fungal growth were observed within the MinistryInstitute building.
7.2. ASBESTOS CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS
Asbestos is a mineral fiber that has been used commonly in a variety of buildingconstruction materials. Asbestos was introduced to building materials on large scaleduring the 20th century because of its physical properties demonstrating its abilities asinsulation, fire-retardant, material strengthening and durability, and it served as a goodbinding product. Because of these properties, asbestos has been used for a widerange of manufactured goods, mostly in building materials (roofing shingles, ceilingand floor tiles, paper products, and asbestos cement products), friction products(automobile clutch, brake, and transmission parts), heat-resistant fabrics, packaging,gaskets, and coatings. Prior to the late 1970s, building products and insulation materials commonly containedasbestos. In 1989, the USEPA banned all new uses of asbestos; however, certainuses developed before 1989 are still allowed. When asbestos-containing materials aredamaged or disturbed by maintenance, repair, remodeling or demolition activities,microscopic fibers can become airborne and inhaled into the lungs, where they cancause significant health problems. The existing subject property structures were constructed prior to the 1970's. Based onthe age of the buildings, the presence of asbestos containing materials is possible. Ifany renovation or demolition is planned, AGE recommends performance of a full leadsurvey by a asbestos inspector.
7.3. LEAD-BASED PAINT
Lead is a toxic metal that was used for many years in products found in and around ourhomes. Lead-based paint (LBP) was used extensively in buildings constructed before1950. In 1978, LBP was banned by the federal government. Lead may cause a rangeof health defects, from behavioral problems and learning disabilities, to seizures anddeath. The existing subject property structures were constructed prior to the 1970's. Based onthe age of the buildings, the presence of LBP-coated surfaces is possible. If anyrenovation or demolition is planned, AGE recommends performance of a full leadsurvey by a qualified lead inspector.
7.4. RADON
Radon is a naturally occurring, colorless, odorless gas that is soluble in water. It isproduced through the radioactive decay of uranium and radium, which is naturallypresent in soil and in minerals in bedrock. Radon is radioactive, which means that itbreaks down or decays to form other elements. Radon concentrations generally differamong different rock types and can vary considerably within the same geologicformation. Radon moves from its source in rocks and soils through voids and fractures.It can enter buildings as a gas through foundation cracks or it can dissolve in groundwater and be carried to buildings through the use of water-supply wells. Buildings with
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 27 basements and concrete slab foundations are more susceptible to elevated levels ofindoor radon gas. The inhalation of radon gas can cause damage to lung tissue. A common unit of radioactivity measurement is picocuries per liter (pCi/L). The USEPAestablished the recommended safe radon level at 4 pCi/L. According to the USEPA,the subject property county, Spokane, is located in a high radon potential area (Zone1), defined as having a ‘predicted average indoor radon screening level of greater than4 pCi/L'.
7.5. WETLANDS
As reported in Section 3.2., according to the EDR Report (Appendix C) the subjectproperty is not located within a National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available inselect counties across the country, was obtained by EDR from the U.S. Fish andWildlife Service.
7.6. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
AGE searched the subject property addresses 402, 414, 418, 424 East MissionAvenue, 1420 North Astor Street, 405 and 411 East Sinto Avenue, Spokane,Washington, on local, state and federal databases. No records were found regardingany outstanding regulatory permitting or requirements/directives in connection with theproperty.
8.0. EVALUATION
Any deviations from the ASTM Standard Practice 1527E-13 and USEPA AAI arepresented below, along with the findings, conclusions, and opinions identified duringthe course of this Phase I.
8.1. DATA GAPS AND LIMITATIONS
A data gap occurs when a lack of or inability to obtain information required by thispractice despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather suchinformation. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities requiredby this practice, including, but not limited to site reconnaissance, and interviews. Thefollowing data gaps and/or limitations were identified during the course of this Phase I,which may deviate from the ASTM standard practice:
• The largest data gap in research was 14 years, between 1932 and 1946, with theearliest researched information being a Sanborn Fire Insurance Map dated in1891. Data gaps generally do not exceed five years between 1891 through thepresent, except between 1902 and 1910. AGE does not believe any gaps in thedata reviewed have affected the ability to identify recognized environmentalconcerns.
• The building interior at 405 East Sinto Ave. was fully inspected, however the
other building interiors from the subject property were not fully accessible duringthe site visit. This lack of information represents a data gap. However, based onthe building interior information obtained during the site visit at 405 East SintoAvenue, the other building interior inspections is not a not a significant data gapor change to any of our recommendations.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 28
8.2. FINDINGS
Based on the standards set by ASTM Practice E1527-13, the following findings aredifferentiated below as Business Environmental Risk (including the presence ofasbestos-containing materials, lead-based paint, mold or moisture conditions, ornon-hazardous regulated materials may constitute a Business Environmental Risk), deminimis conditions unlikely to be subject to government enforcement, HRECs, CRECsand RECs, as defined in Section 1.1. of this report.
8.2.1. Business Environmental Risk
This assessment has revealed no evidence of potential Business Environmental Risksin connection with the subject property, except for the following:
• The existing subject property structures were constructed prior to the 1970's.Based on the age of the buildings, the presence of asbestos containing materialsand lead based paint is possible. If any renovation or demolition is planned, AGErecommends performance of a full surveys by licensed consultants.
8.2.2. De Minimis Conditions
This assessment revealed no evidence of potential or de minimis conditions inconnection with the subject property.
8.2.3. Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions
This assessment has revealed no evidence of HRECs in connection with the subjectproperty.
8.2.4. Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions
This assessment has revealed no evidence of CRECs in connection with the subjectproperty.
8.2.5. Recognized Environmental Conditions
This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with the subjectproperty.
9.0. CONCLUSIONS AND OPINION
AdvancedGeo, Inc. has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment inconformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13, US-EPA AAIfor the subject property located at 402, 414, 418, 424 East Mission Avenue, 1420North Astor Street, 405 and 411 East Sinto Avenue, Spokane, Washington. Anyexceptions to, or deletions from, this practice or scope of work are described in Section8.1. of this report or presented as non-ASTM services in Section 7.0. It is the opinion ofthe environmental professionals that the findings and conclusions presented in thisreport are reasonable and prudent, given the evidence as presented.This assessmenthas revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with the property. AGE has norecommendations for additional environmental investigations of the subject property.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 29
10.0. SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS
We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet thedefinition of Environmental professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR § 312 and wehave the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assessa property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We havedeveloped and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with thestandards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
Robert LoefflerVice President/Senior Geologist
11.0. QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS
Qualifications of the environmental professionals involved in the preparation of thisPhase I are included in Appendix F.
12.0. REFERENCES
The following documents, maps or other publications may have been utilized duringthe preparation of this Phase I:
• ASTM, E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: PhaseI Environmental Site Assessment Process, 2013.
• California Department of Water Resources (DWR), Groundwater Basins inCalifornia, Version 3.0., 2003.
• Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR)-prepared: The EDR Radius Map, TheEDR-City Directory Abstract, Certified Sanborn® Map Report, EDR HistoricalTopographic Map Report, EDR Historical Aerial Photograph Report.
• [Reports/Documents used or referenced within the report]
The following websites may have been accessed to obtain information during thepreparation of this Phase I:
• California State Water Resource Control Board’s GeoTracker website:http://geotracker.swrcb.ca.gov/
• California Geological Survey — Note 36: California Geomorphic Provinces:http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/information/publications/cgs_notes/note_36/Documents/note_36.pdf
• California Department of Water Resources website: http://www.cd.water.ca.gov/
• DTSC’s ENVIROSTOR website: www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public
• DTSC’s HWTS website: http://www.hwts.dtsc.ca.gov/
http://geotracker.swrcb.ca.gov/http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/information/publications/cgs_notes/note_36/Documents/note_36.pdfhttp://www.cd.water.ca.gov/http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/publichttp://www.hwts.dtsc.ca.gov/
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 30
• FEMA’s website: www.fema.gov/
• ParcelQuest by CD-DATA online download: www.parcelquest.com
• USEPA’s Envirofacts website: www.epa.gov/enviro
• USEPA’s radon information website: www.epa.gov/radon/zonemap.html#mapcolors
• USEPA’s lead information website: www.epa.gov/lead/
• USEPA’s asbestos information website: www.epa.gov/asbestos/
• USEPA’s mold information website: www.epa.gov/mold/moldguide.html
• Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) Online Mapping
(DOM) System: http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doms/doms-app.html
http://www.fema.gov/http://www.parcelquest.comhttp://www.epa.gov/envirohttp://www.epa.gov/radon/zonemap.html#mapcolorshttp://www.epa.gov/lead/http://www.epa.gov/asbestos/http://www.epa.gov/mold/moldguide.htmlhttp://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doms/doms-app.html
-
Figures
-
Appendix A -
Photographs of the Subject Property
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 1
1 : View of the front (south-facing) side of the three level Fuchs Memorial Apartments (411East Sinto).
2 : Lower level of the Fuchs Memorial Apartments.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 2
3 : Parking area and north-facing side of the Fuchs Memorial Apartments.
4 : Small access way between the Fuchs Memorial Apartments and Mater Dei (lookingsouth).
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 3
5 : Small access way between the Fuchs Memorial Apartments and Mater Dei (lookingnorth).
6 : Mater Dei building (405 East Sinto), looking south.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 4
7 : West-facing side of the Mater Dei building.
8 : Basement windows along the west-facing side of Mater Dei.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 5
9 : Small carport parking area at the north side of the Mater Dei building.
10 : Mele Hall building (1420 North Astor), looking southeast).
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 6
11 : North side of the Mele Hall building.
12 : South and east sides of the Mele Hall building.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 7
13 : North and west-facing sides of the Neville Manor building, looking east. (402 EastMission Avenue).
14 : West and south sides of the Neville building (looking northeast).
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 8
15 : East and north sides of the Neville building, looking southwest.
16 : North side of the Daigle House (414 East Mission Avenue).
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 9
17 : Rear (south-facing sides) of the Daigle House and Villa Maria (right side ofphotograph), looking north from the Alley.
18 : South side of Daigle House.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 10
19 : Front (north-facing) side of the Villa Maria (418 East Mission Avenue).
20 : Villa Maria, looking southwest.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 11
21 : Rear portion of the Villa Maria.
22 : Rear Portion of the Villa Maria.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 12
23 : Maintenance and storage building located adjacent to Alley, behind Fuch's MissionCottage.
24 : Fuch's Mission Cottage (424 East Mission Avenue).
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 13
25 : Rear of Fuch's Mssion Cottage
26 : Rear of Fuch's Mission Cottage showing small access to basement area.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 14
27 : Fuch's Mission Cottage, looking northwest.
28 : View of the East Mission Avenue buildings looking west-southwest.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 15
29 : Interior of Mater Dei.
30 : Interior of Mater Dei.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 16
31 : Library within Mater Dei.
32 : Laundry room in the basement of Mater Dei (with floor drain).
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 17
33 : Laundry and storage in the basement of Mater Dei.
34 : Boiler/Water heater room in the basement of Mater Dei.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 18
35 : Stairwell within the Mater Dei building.
36 : Typical interior room of upper level of Mater Dei.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 19
37 : Typical hallway and stairwell in Mater Dei.
38 : Chapel room in Mater Dei.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 20
39 : Former coal chute located in basement of Mater Dei.
40 : Residential properties to the east.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 21
41 : Residential properties to the South.
42 : Residential properties to the North.
-
January 10, 2020Project No. 19-4967Page 22
43 : Residential properties to the west.
Title PageTable of ContentsExecutive SummaryEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Detail Report1.0. INTRODUCTION1.1. PURPOSE1.2. SITE DESCRIPTION1.2.1. Location and Legal Description1.2.2. Site and Vicinity General Characteristics1.2.3. Current Use of Property1.2.4. Proposed Use of Property1.2.5. Property Utilities
1.3. DETAILED SCOPE-OF-SERVICES1.4. SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS1.5. LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS1.6. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS1.7. USER RELIANCE
2.0. USER PROVIDED INFORMATION3.0. RECORDS REVIEW3.1. HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION3.1.1. Historical Use Information on Subject Property3.1.2. Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties
3.2. PHYSICAL SETTING3.3. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES3.3.1. SUBJ