Phase II Upgrades

Eckhard ElsenDirector Research and Computing

LHC RRB Meeting, Oct 29-31, 2018

updated after the meeting with CMS information of 29.10.2018

ATLAS and CMS Phase II Upgrades

• Original plans had been outlined in LoI and Technical Proposal

• Scoping Documents have been provided in addition end 2015

• All* TDRs have been received; good understanding of the technical needs and scope

CE

RN

-LH

CC

-20

17

-02

3/

CM

S-T

DR

-01

9

08/

04/

2018

THE PHASE-2 UPGRADE O

F THE ENDCAP CALORIM

ETERTECHNICAL DESIG

N REPORT

CER

N-LH

CC

-2017-023 ISBN: 978-92-9083-459-5

ISBN: 978-92-9083-459-5

CMS

CERN-LHCC-2017-023 CMS-TDR-019

9 Apr 2018Organisation européenne pour la recherche nucléaire

CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research

The Phase-2 Upgrade of the CMS Endcap Calorimeter

Technical Design Report

* CMS TDAQ scheduled to come later to profit from technology development

Two of the later TDRs

Experiments

• Each major detector component provided its own TDR;10 TDRs have been received in total

• TDRs were scheduled not to arrive at the same time

• TDRs have been examined by LHCC for physics need and technical soundness

• Cost matrix and risks monitored by UCG

• Try to optimise and profit from synergies in technical development

• April RRB closed the loop for the first time

Status April RRB

• LHCC assumptions on LHC luminosity are realistic; pile-up of 60 in 2017 is an indicator of what is to come at the HL-LHC

• Experiments have to safeguard themselves (Timing detectors)

• All TDRs have been scrutinised – thanks to tremendous LHCC/UCG effort

• A smaller version of the upgrade would not exploit the investments in HL-LHC in full

• Cost has been optimised; additional R&D will continue

• Loop has been closed: Scoping Document → 10+1 TDRs → Cost Overview

Money Matrix

• Continuously updated and maintained by experiments during the process

• original cost frame maintained

• timing detectors have been examined for physics need in November 2017 LHCC and are included in the phase II upgrade

• encouraging involvement of funding agencies

• have reached good closure so far

• October 2018 RRB to settle the sharing

ATLAS 269 MCHFTotal

CORE Costs1) [kCHF] 44'880 123'226 28'385 11'573 28'401 8'499 244'964 24'420 269'384

Funding AgencyArgentina 759 759 78 837ArmeniaAustralia 390 2'021 2'411 196 2'606Austria 200 200 39 239Azerbaijan 13 13Belarus 13 13 26 39Brazil 200 200 183 383Canada 5'958 1'573 7'531 849 8'379Chile 50 50 131 181China NSFC+MSTC 2'043 777 2'819 627 3'446Colombia 400 400 52 452Czech Republic 500 4'550 560 5'610 509 6'119Denmark 773 648 1'421 144 1'565France IN2P3 786 6'075 5'800 943 2'700 16'305 1'489 17'794France CEA 1'139 2'343 410 3'891 313 4'204Georgia 78 78 78 156Germany BMBF 2'760 11'677 1'450 444 1'950 300 18'582 1'998 20'580Germany DESY 6'034 6'034 483 6'518Germany MPI 636 493 237 2'432 3'799 274 4'073Greece 800 2'505 3'305 196 3'500Hong Kong 466 323 789 131 920Israel 2'503 384 2'887 379 3'265Italy 3'850 5'585 1'800 598 5'621 17'454 2'207 19'661Japan 1'643 11'638 4'281 17'562 992 18'555Morocco 144 144Netherlands 400 2'779 425 3'604 313 3'917Norway 1'918 1'918 209 2'127Poland 2'000 1'720 3'720 379 4'098Portugal 405 988 1'393 196 1'589Romania 1'735 1'174 2'909 209 3'118Russia 1'283 1'431 70 1'813 4'597 836 5'433JINR 940 1'043 48 430 600 3'060 340 3'400Serbia 65 65Slovak Republic 600 400 300 1'300 131 1'431Slovenia 755 120 875 104 980South Africa 400 700 1'100 118 1'218Spain 3'502 1'315 440 5'257 640 5'897Sweden 200 2'162 1'561 800 4'723 392 5'115Switzerland 1'500 5'275 6'775 326 7'101Taipei 502 500 1'001 104 1'106Turkey 500 506 250 1'256 144 1'400United Kingdom 3'821 16'818 20'639 2'494 23'134USA DOE 2'135 20'470 378 22'983 3'656 26'639USA NSF 5'940 8'441 1'882 2'899 19'162 901 20'063CERN 8'044 7'975 3'494 882 3'094 2'006 25'495 1'332 26'827TOTAL (kCHF) 44'221 123'384 28'389 11'557 28'401 7'915 243'867 24'420 268'287

Uncertainty Low 74.5% 85.6% 95.0% 82.3% 62.5% 87.8% 81.9% 100.0% 83.6%Medium 15.1% 14.1% 5.0% 16.8% 34.8% 15.3% 13.9%High 9.0% 0.4% 0.8% 2.7% 5.3% 2.4% 2.2%% of CORE Costs 98.5% 100.1% 100.0% 99.9% 100.0% 93.1% 99.6% 100.0% 99.6%

∆ (Total - CORE Costs) -659 157 4 -15 -584 -1'097 -1'097

Notes

For HGTD, FWD, µ-Tagger see notes 3-6).2) Bar scale normalised to largest entry in column.3) The High Granularity Timing Detector (HGTD) has not yet been reviewed, the TDR will follow in 2019.4) A new LUCID detector was originally proposed in the Scoping Document under "Forward Detectors". It is now planned as a "Small Project" with details to be worked out in the coming months.5) The remaining Forward Detector projects (ALFA,AFP,ZDC) are not being formally proposed at this stage.6) The µ-Tagger project is not included in the present Phase-II scope, but remains an option as a further upgrade project for installation at a later stage (>2025)

1) CORE costs as defined in the TDRs and reviewed in detail by the Upgrade Cost Group (UCG) for TDAQ, ITk, LAr, Tile, Muons.

ATLAS Phase-II Upgrades – envisaged CORE Contributions by Funding Agency [kCHF]

ITk

CORE Commitments

TDAQ LAr Tile Muons HGTD 3) TotalCommon

Fund TOTAL2) (incl. CF)

CMS 279 MCHFFA/Subsystem EC-CALO Barrel-CALO Muons Tracker MIP-TD BRIL TDAQCommonFund

TotalPhase-2

CORECosts(kCHF) 67,127 13,255 25,187 111,900 15,796 2,600 18,500 25,000 279,365Austria 900 800 326 2,026BelgiumFNRS 100 4,800 489 5,389BelgiumFWO 5,000 417 5,417Brazil/FAPESP 1,290 127 1,417Brazil/RENAFAE 380 380Bulgaria 360 181 541CERN 21,500 2,000 1,524 19,500 1,200 4,500 1,322 51,546China 900 1,350 500 254 3,004Colombia 80 72 152Croatia 1,350 145 1,495Cyprus 127 127Egypt 200 54 254Estonia 522 54 576Finland 151 1,100 1,000 236 2,487France-CEA 1,000 1,500 500 308 3,308France-IN2P3 6,400 600 4,600 924 12,524GermanyBMBF 1,920 9,450 1,196 12,566GermanyHelmholtz 9,107 500 634 10,241Greece 350 1,400 1,000 326 3,076Hungary 225 300 150 225 181 1,081India 1,977 179 1,383 2,000 250 598 6,387Iran 1,390 145 1,535Ireland 36 36Italy 1,900 5,150 14,000 3,600 200 3,007 27,857Korea 2,056 562 2,618Lithuania 348 36 384Malaysia 870 91 961Mexico 1,000 199 1,199NewZealand 70 36 106Pakistan 550 1,600 36 2,186Poland 300 272 572Portugal 440 490 910 109 1,949RDMS-DMS-Russia 8,200 410 350 1,522 10,482Serbia 80 54 134Spain 1,500 1,200 200 100 779 3,779Switzerland 2,400 9,100 1,000 707 13,207Taipei 2,600 272 2,872Thailand 100 54 154Turkey 2,094 217 2,311UnitedKingdom 3,500 500 2,500 500 1,033 8,033USA-DOE 14,500 2,698 13,690 5,000 3,886 5,431 45,205USA-NSF 4,194 2,230 12,840 900 1,381 21,545USA-DOE-NP 5,305 525 5,830Ecuador 36 36Montenegro 190 36 226SriLanka 760 72 832Latvia 380 36 416Qatar 300 300Funding(kCHF) 67,251 13,243 25,937 114,277 12,360 1,845 18,811 25,035 278,759Uncertaintylow 75% 98% 70% 94% 92% 81% 58% 100% 85%UncertaintyMedium 18% 1% 23% 5% 0% 19% 9% 0% 9%UncertaintyHigh 7% 1% 7% 1% 8% 0% 33% 0% 5%Funding/CORECosts 100% 100% 103% 102% 78% 71% 102% 100% 100%Funding-CORECosts 124 -12 750 2,377 -3436 -755 311 35 -606

ColourcodingUncertaintylowUncertaintyMediumUncertaintyHigh

CMSPhase2MoneyMatrix(inkCHF)-RRB,29October2018

Goal for October RRB (this meeting)

• MoUs for Common Fund has been put in place a year ago

• Most of the TDRs have been thoroughly scrutinised

• remaining TDR subjected to same procedure; cost estimate is available

• Timing detectors to come

• So

• agree on the overall cost envelope (>1/4 bnCHF for each experiment)

• begin to conclude MoU with each funding agency

Common Fund for HL-LHC – Status of Signatures

• Single MoU to describe Common Fund capped at a fraction O(10%) ~ 25 MCHF

• spread evenly over construction period

• Sharing according to PhD or equivalent

• Separate budgeting from M&O but similar accounting methods

• Status of signatures:Fraction of signatures

same principle

applied for both

experiments

ATLAS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2017-058

12.10.2017 Page 1

Addendum No. 17

to the

Memorandum of Understanding for Collaboration in the Construction of the

ATLAS Detector

Common Items for the Phase-II Upgrade of the ATLAS Detector

CMS COLLABORATION CERN-RRB-2017-060

24 October 2017 Page 1 /13 CMS-MoU-Upg Add#10

Addendum No. 10

to the Memorandum of Understanding

for Collaboration in the Construction of the CMS Detector

Common Items for the Phase II Upgrade of the CMS

Detector

Considering that: The construction of the CMS detector is governed by a Memorandum of Understanding, along with its Amendments and Addenda, setting out the responsibilities of the different participating Institutes and Funding Agencies for the construction of the CMS detector1 (Construction MoU). Maintenance and Operation of the CMS detector is governed by a Memorandum of Understanding for Maintenance and Operation (M&O MoU)2. In order to be able to take full advantage of the planned High-Luminosity upgrade of the LHC, the CMS Collaboration (hereafter referred to as “the Collaboration”) has proposed in document “Financial Plan for CMS Upgrade” (CERN-RRB-2013-045) an Upgrade Phase II Project of the CMS detector consisting of modifications and replacements of existing Sub-detectors as well as new additions to the detector. This process will start in 2018 and is expected to be completed in 2026. Proposals for Sub-detector Upgrades have been reviewed by the LHCC, based on an Upgrade Technical Proposal (CERN-LHCC-2015-010). The financing of the Upgrades Phase II Project is agreed to be a common responsibility of the Collaboration. The overall sharing of costs is based on the principle of equity as defined by the proportionate share of PhD physicist authors supported by each Funding Agency. Following approval by the CERN Director-General, individual Sub-detector Phase II Upgrades would be the subject of addenda to the Construction MoU, signed between the Funding Agencies contributing to these upgrades and CERN as the Host Laboratory. For the Upgrade Phase II Project, the Collaboration has created a Common Fund to cover infrastructure costs that the Collaboration has agreed to bear at its common expense.

1 Memorandum of Understanding for Collaboration in the Construction of the CMS Detector RRB CMS-D 98-31 2 Memorandum of Understanding for Maintenance and Operation of in the Construction of the CMS Detector CERN-RRB-2002-033/2007

ATLAS

signed

CMS

signed

Phase II Upgrade Group (P2UG)

• Progress Tracking of the Phase II upgrade

• ATLAS and CMS progress reviewed every 6 months, interleaved

• Milestone tracking

• Chairs

• Marcel Demarteau

• Mauro Morandin

• Each team is consists of ~10 experts including those familiar with the TDR approval process

Full mandate of P2UG• The ATLAS and CMS P2UG chairs and regular members are nominated by the CERN DRC, also using the broad

expertise available among the members of the Phase II TDRs review panels. The P2UGs report to the DRC and to the LHCC through their chairs. The LHCC and UCG chairs are ex-officio members of the two P2UGs, although they are not expected to participate in every meeting.

• The P2UGs  will monitor the execution of the Phase II upgrade projects, verifying the technical progress, tracking the milestones, and ensuring the level of effort and managerial organisation are adequate. They will regularly report to the LHCC about their findings, promptly identifying areas that might require further in-depth investigation, in particular significant deviations from the TDR plans. The P2UGs is also expected to report on the final reviews convened by the experiments before major spending, proving advice to the LHCC and the CERN management on the approval for construction of the projects, described  as Step 3 in CERN-LHCC-2015-007. It is expected that each P2UG will meet twice a year with the respective experiment, scheduling the meeting to maximize synergies with the experiment internal review process. CERN will provide centralised support for collecting and maintaining milestones and schedule information uniformly for the two experiments, as well as secretarial support to run the meetings

• The initial mandate for the P2UGs members will be two years, although the P2UGs should remain in place until the installation of the upgrades, currently foreseen during LS3 (Q1/2024-Q2/2026). 

Upgrade Cost Group (UCG) ↔ Phase II Upgrade Group (P2UP)

• Upgrade Cost Group

• continues to review remaining (and forthcoming) TDRs

• Phase II Upgrade Group

• Reviews the execution of the approved TDRs

Conclusion

• TDRs in place

• Tremendous effort has been made by LHCC and UCG

• LHCC / UCG work is very well supported (including cross-refereeing)

• Upgrade Progress will be monitored by two standing sub-committees of the LHCC, the P2UG

• Cost containment fulfilled; need of Timing detector

• Proceed to MoUs