phenomenology of heavy-ion collisionsborghini/teaching...phenomenology of heavy-ion collisions how...
TRANSCRIPT
Phenomenology of heavy-ion collisions
How can one characterize what is created in a heavy-ion collision?
Focus on “collective phenomena” present in nucleus-nucleus collisions, but absent in pp collisions (“condensed matter physics of QCD”)
Establish a reference, in which collective effects are absent.
Quantify the deviation from these benchmarks in nucleus-nucleus collisions.
Analyze the origin of these deviations.
First measurement: multiplicity
number Nch of charged particles ∝
PHOBOS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 3100
First measurement: multiplicity
number Nch of charged particles ∝
PHOBOS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 3100
Nucleon-nucleon cross-section
taken from Miller, Reygers, Sanders & Steinberg, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 205
Multiplicity distribution
Vary the equivalent number of nucleon-nucleon collisions between and :
Probability P (n,b) to find a multiplicity n in a particular A-B collision at impact parameter b:
Gaussian around , with some dispersion; given by a Monte-Carlo simulation.
event-multiplicity distribution:
probability that an inelastic process occur
N̄AB(b) =(
1− x
2N̄AB
part(b) + xN̄ABcoll (b)
)N̄NN
N̄ABpart(b) N̄AB
coll (b)
N̄AB(b)
dNevts
dn=
∫dbP (n,b)
{1−
[1− σinel
NNTAB(b)]AB
}
taken from Miller, Reygers, Sanders & Steinberg, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 205
Multiplicity distribution
Multiplicity distributiondNevts
dn=
∫dbP (n,b)
{1−
[1− σinel
NNTAB(b)]AB
}
figure from Kharzeev & Nardi, Phys. Lett. B 507 (2001) 121
Multiplicity vs. geometry
taken from Miller, Reygers, Sanders & Steinberg, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 205
Multiplicity vs. geometry
taken from Miller, Reygers, Sanders & Steinberg, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 205
Cross-checking Glauber theoryMultiplicity at projectile rapidity vs. at midrapidity
data from PHOBOS Collaboration Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 021901(R)
Pseudorapidity distributions
figure taken from Miller, Reygers, Sanders & Steinberg, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 205
Collision centralities: 0-6%, 6-15%, 15-25%, 25-35%, 35-45%, 45-55% (missing / not shown at the lower two energies)
taken from BRAHMS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 162301
Rapidity distributions
Multiplicity at mid-rapidityBeware: in fact, at η=0, not y=0!
taken from PHOBOS Collaboration Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 021901(R)
data from PHOBOS Collaboration Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 021901(R)
Charged hadron multiplicity
data from PHOBOS Collaboration Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 021901(R)
We boost everything to the rest frame of one nucleus (“projectile”)
universal
“limiting fragmentation”
Charged hadron multiplicity
data from PHOBOS Collaboration Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 021901(R)
We boost everything to the rest frame of one nucleus (“projectile”)
universal
“limiting fragmentation”
ln√
sNN
growslike
Charged hadron multiplicity
We boost everything to the rest frame of one nucleus (“projectile”)
universal
“limiting fragmentation”
Charged hadron multiplicity
We boost everything to the rest frame of one nucleus (“projectile”)
universal
“limiting fragmentation”
−ybeam @ LHC
Charged hadron multiplicity
We boost everything to the rest frame of one nucleus (“projectile”)
universal
“limiting fragmentation”
ln√
sNN
growslike
−ybeam @ LHC
Busza 2004; N.B. & Wiedemann 2008
Charged hadron multiplicity
The naive extrapolation of RHIC data yields at -increase, in opposition to conventional power-law rise
dN ch
dη≈ 1100 η = 0
ln√
sNN
Charged hadron multiplicity
The naive extrapolation of RHIC data yields at -increase, in opposition to conventional power-law rise
dN ch
dη≈ 1100 η = 0
ln√
sNN
organized byN.Armesto, N.B., S.Jeon & U.A.Wiedemann
Hijing + baryon junctions: 3500 EPOS (multiple scattering): 2500 pQCD minijets + saturation
(EKRT) of produced gluons: 2570 AMPT (Hijing+ZPC): ≈2500 Percolating strings:
DMPJET III: ≈1900 Pajares et al.: 1500-1600
2-component + shadowing: ≈1700
“Geometric scaling” (Armesto, Salgado, Wiedemann): 1700-1900 Gluon saturation (Kharzeev,
Levin, Nardi 2000-05): 1800-2100 B-K eq.+ running coupling
(Albacete, Kovchegov): ≈1400 “CGC” (Gelis, Stasto, Venugopalan):
1000-1400 ALCOR (quark-antiquark plasma
+ recombination): 1250-1830 = dN ch
dy
Charged hadron multiplicity
taken from BRAHMS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 102301
Net baryon-number density
bulk: “soft particles”
high-pT particles
Transverse-momentum spectrum
∝ N̄ABcoll (b)∝ N̄AB
part(b)