phenotypic characterization of weedy rice in california...discriminant analysis (fig. 4). ca rice...

1
Introduction The overall goal of our project is to control weedy rice. In this study, the specific objective is to phenotypically characterize the weedy rice existing in California, to understand the morphological and physiological traits of CA weedy rice that will aid in early detection of weedy rice. Materials and Methods Objectives Results Phenotypic Characterization of Weedy Rice in California Table 1. Plant characteristics of weedy rice ecotypes and cultivated rice varieties (CARV). Fig. 1 Weedy rice and cultivated rice varieties planted in the greenhouse at Rice Experiment Station. Summary & Conclusion Teresa B. De Leon 1 , Kassim Al-Khatib 1 , Luis Espino 2 , Timothy Blank 1 , Randall Mutters 2 , Michelle Leinfelder-Miles 2 , Bruce Linquist 1 , Amar Godar 1 , and Whitney Brim-DeForest 2 1 University of California, Davis 2 University of California Cooperative Extension Weeds are a major constraint to rice production. Growers typically spend about $135 per acre to limit the occurrence of weeds in their field and to maximize their profits. Among the weeds infesting rice fields, weedy rice is a major concern because it can lower the quality of rice and yield loss can be as high as 50% (Shivrain et al 2009). Here in California, the problem of weeds in rice production is significantly reduced both by application of herbicides and water-seeded planting of rice. However, there is no registered rice herbicides that will selectively control weedy rice. Weedy rice is a conspecific relative of rice. It is morphologically and genetically similar to rice. Due to its close relatedness to rice, control of weedy rice is difficult because the herbicides that control weedy rice will also kill the cultivated rice varieties. To date, there is no Clearfield or Provisia rice technology available to CA rice growers. Therefore, growers only option is to adopt cultural practices and policies that will limit the spread of weedy rice. The key to control weedy rice is early detection in the field to prevent further deposition of weedy rice seeds in the soil seed bank. Weedy rices are characterized by high shattering and high seed dormancy. Seeds may remain dormant up to ten years and will serve as a source of weedy rice infestations if weedy rice plants are left undetected and allowed to grow until maturity in the field. In 2017, weedy rice was found in about 10,000 acres of CA rice fields. Early action is necessary to avoid further spread and infestation of other rice fields. A total of 133 weedy rice collections were planted and characterized along with cultivated rice varieties in the greenhouse at Rice Experiment Station. Five plants per collection were grown until maturity. Morphological and physiological attributes were recorded to identify weedy traits that will aid in early differentiation between weedy rice and cultivated rice Results RR116 RR111 RR133 M-205 144 cm 99 cm 74 cm 86 cm M-205 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 (MG) Type 5( LG) Seed germination at 30⁰C, 7 days after sowing Type 1 Acknowledgments varieties. Qualitative traits such as leaf sheath, node, auricle, ligules and pericarp color were converted into numerical scores. Flowering date was noted for each panicle when 2-3 cm of the panicle emerged from the boot. Thirty-five days after flowering when grains were physiologically matured and had about 14% moisture content, panicles were harvested. Seed shattering was evaluated using a digital force gauge. Five panicles from five plants/collection were selected. From which, the five top seeds per panicle were pulled to measure the amount of force required to break one grain from the panicle. Immediately following seed shattering evaluations, twenty seeds per panicle were sowed in wet paper towels and incubated at 30⁰C for 7 days. The number of seeds germinated were then recorded to assess the level of seed dormancy in CA weedy rice and cultivated rice varieties. The seed dormancy test was repeated at least three times per collection or variety. Using 17 SSR markers, genetic characterization of 103 weedy rice collected in 2006 indicated that the majority of the weedy rice entries were the same. Redundant entries were removed before further characterization that resulted in a total of 40 weedy rice entries. From the genetic study, at least five genetically distinct ecotypes of weedy rice were identified. Type 1 are short grain, strawhull without awn, type 2 are medium grain bronzehull without awn, type 3 are medium grain strawhull with long awn, type 4 is short grain blackhull with long awn and type 5 are an admixture of medium and long grain strawhull, partially awned. To understand the differences between ecotypes and cultivated rice varieties, MANOVA was implemented. Correlations of traits and discriminant analyses were employed to confirm the ecotype classifications of weedy rice. All data are presented as group mean phenotype. CA weedy rice collections showed significant diversity in terms of seed hull color, grain type and awn length (fig. 2). The genetic classification of weedy rice were confirmed by discriminant analysis (fig. 4). CA rice varieties were phenotypically distinct from CA weedy rice based on 14 morphological traits (fig. 4). MANOVA tests for the hypothesis of no overall ecotype effect indicated significant differences among ecotypes (p-value=<.0001). Significant differences were observed among ecotypes and rice varieties in morphological (pubescence, hull, bran, auricles, node colors and plant height) and physiological traits (chlorophyll content, heading date, seed shattering and dormancy). All ecotypes had red pericarp, pubescent leaves, and were all taller than cultivated rice. All weedy rice ecotypes had lower chlorophyll content or pale green leaves than cultivated varieties. Blackhull (type 4) and bronzehull (type 2) weedy rice were early flowering type. Medium grain, strawhull (type 3) ecotypes flowered at the same time with cultivated rice varieties while short grain strawhull (type 1) and admixture (type 5) weedy rice were late flowering. Except for ecotype 5, all weedy rice exhibit high degree of seed shattering and seed dormancy. Fig. 2. Five weedy rice ecotypes and their distribution by county. type 1 type 2 M-205 type 3 type 4 type 5 Weedy rice ecotype: ecotype 1 ecotype 2 ecotype 3 ecotype 4 ecotype 5 Fig. 5. Mean chlorophyll content of CA weedy rice ecotypes and CA cultivated rice varieties (CARV). A B C D E F smooth (1) partially pubescent (2) Fig. 6. Comparison of weedy rice ecotypes and cultivated rice. A, Plant height during flowering stage. B, Days to flowering. C, Seed shattering measured 35 days after flowering. D, Dormancy test by germination of seeds. 1 2 3 4 short grain (1) medium grain (2) long grain (3) Fig. 3. Morphological traits and their corresponding numerical scores observed among CA weedy rice ecotypes. A, awn length differences. B, grain types. C, node colors. D, leaf sheaths. E, ligule and auricles. F, leaf surface pubescence. purple node (2) green node (1) green (1) purple (2) leaf sheaths white ligule-green auricles purple ligule-purple auricles white ligule-purple auricles A B C D E F 19 <.0001 Plant height (cm) 17 19 <.0001 Days to heading 0.0125 Breaking tensile strength (gf) 18 19 17 37 <.0001 % Germination A B C D pubescent (3) partially pubescent (2) not pubescent (1) <.0001 Chlorophyll content (SPAD unit) CA rice varieties CA weedy rice N PUB AWN HULL GRAIN BRAN LS AURI LIG NODE CHL PH HD SHAT DORM CARV 6 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 29.5 79.3 62.2 18.5 72.2 Type 1 6 2.5** 1.0 2*** 1** 2*** 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 23.8** 140.2*** 79.8*** 3.7 3.2*** Type 2 18 2.7*** 1.2 3*** 1.9 2*** 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.2 25.8* 121.9*** 58.2 10.6 89.9 Type 3 10 2.0 4*** 2*** 2.0 2*** 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 22.8*** 117.7*** 61.7 4.8 4.6*** Type 4 1 2.0 4*** 4*** 1.0 2*** 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 26.0 99.0 55.0 2.0 27.0 Type 5 11 2.1 2.2 2.2*** 2.3 2.2*** 1.8** 2* 1.2 2.2** 24.7** 107.4*** 68.7 32.1 70.7 Ecotype effect (Pr>F) <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 0.0001 0.0039 0.6079 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 0.0125 <.0001 Fig. 4. Population structure of weedy rice ecotypes based on 14 morphological and physiological traits by canonical discriminant analysis. N, number of rice entries. PUB, pubescence. HULL, hull color. GRAIN, grain type. BRAN, pericarp color. LS, leaf sheath color. AURI, auricle color. LIG, ligule color. NODE, internode color. CHL, chlorophyll content. PH, plant height. HD, days to heading. SHAT, shattering, DORM, percent germination. *Significantly different to CARV at 0.05, **significant at 0.01, and ***significant at 0.0001 probability level.

Upload: others

Post on 09-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Phenotypic Characterization of Weedy Rice in California...discriminant analysis (fig. 4). CA rice varieties were phenotypically distinct from CA weedy rice based on 14 morphological

Introduction

The overall goal of our project is to control weedy rice. In this study, the specific objective is to phenotypically characterize the weedy rice existing in California, to understand the morphological and physiological traits of CA weedy rice that will aid in early detection of weedy rice.

Materials and Methods

Objectives

Results

Phenotypic Characterization of Weedy Rice in California

Table 1. Plant characteristics of weedy rice ecotypes and cultivated rice varieties (CARV).

Fig. 1 Weedy rice and cultivated rice varieties planted in the greenhouse at Rice Experiment Station.

Summary & Conclusion

Teresa B. De Leon1, Kassim Al-Khatib1, Luis Espino2, Timothy Blank1, Randall Mutters2, Michelle Leinfelder-Miles2, Bruce Linquist1, Amar Godar1, and Whitney Brim-DeForest2

1University of California, Davis2University of California Cooperative Extension

Weeds are a major constraint to rice production. Growers typically spend about $135 per acre to limit the occurrence of weeds in their field and to maximize their profits. Among the weeds infesting rice fields, weedy rice is a major concern because it can lower the quality of rice and yield loss can be as high as 50% (Shivrain et al 2009). Here in California, the problem of weeds in rice production is significantly reduced both by application of herbicides and water-seeded planting of rice. However, there is no registered rice herbicides that will selectively control weedy rice.

Weedy rice is a conspecific relative of rice. It is morphologically and genetically similar to rice. Due to its close relatedness to rice, control of weedy rice is difficult because the herbicides that control weedy rice will also kill the cultivated rice varieties. To date, there is no Clearfield or Provisia rice technology available to CA rice growers. Therefore, growers only option is to adopt cultural practices and policies that will limit the spread of weedy rice. The key to control weedy rice is early detection in the field to prevent further deposition of weedy rice seeds in the soil seed bank. Weedy rices are characterized by high shattering and high seed dormancy. Seeds may remain dormant up to ten years and will serve as a source of weedy rice infestations if weedy rice plants are left undetected and allowed to grow until maturity in the field.

In 2017, weedy rice was found in about 10,000 acres of CA rice fields. Early action is necessary to avoid further spread and infestation of other rice fields.

A total of 133 weedy rice collections were planted and characterized along with cultivated rice varieties in the greenhouse at Rice Experiment Station. Five plants per collection were grown until maturity. Morphological and physiological attributes were recorded to identify weedy traits that will aid in early differentiation between weedy rice and cultivated rice

Results

RR116 RR111 RR133 M-205

144 cm 99 cm 74 cm 86 cm

M-205

Type 2

Type 3 Type 4

Type 5 (MG)

Type 5( LG)

Seed germination at 30⁰C, 7 days after sowing

Type 1

Acknowledgments

varieties. Qualitative traits such as leaf sheath, node, auricle, ligules and pericarp color were converted into numerical scores. Flowering date was noted for each panicle when 2-3 cm of the panicle emerged from the boot. Thirty-five days after flowering when grains were physiologically matured and had about 14% moisture content, panicles were harvested. Seed shattering was evaluated using a digital force gauge. Five panicles from five plants/collection were selected. From which, the five top seeds per panicle were pulled to measure the amount of force required to break one grain from the panicle. Immediately following seed shattering evaluations, twenty seeds per panicle were sowed in wet paper towels and incubated at 30⁰C for 7 days. The number of seeds germinated were then recorded to assess the level of seed dormancy in CA weedy rice and cultivated rice varieties. The seed dormancy test was repeated at least three times per collection or variety. Using 17 SSR markers, genetic characterization of 103 weedy rice collected in 2006 indicated that the majority of the weedy rice entries were the same. Redundant entries were removed before further characterization that resulted in a total of 40 weedy rice entries. From the genetic study, at least five genetically distinct ecotypes of weedy rice were identified. Type 1 are short grain, strawhull without awn, type 2 are medium grain bronzehull without awn, type 3 are medium grain strawhull with long awn, type 4 is short grain blackhull with long awn and type 5 are an admixture of medium and long grain strawhull, partially awned. To understand the differences between ecotypes and cultivated rice varieties, MANOVA was implemented. Correlations of traits and discriminant analyses were employed to confirm the ecotype classifications of weedy rice. All data are presented as group mean phenotype.

CA weedy rice collections showed significant diversity in terms of seed hull color, grain type and awn length (fig. 2).

The genetic classification of weedy rice were confirmed by discriminant analysis (fig. 4).

CA rice varieties were phenotypically distinct from CA weedy rice based on 14 morphological traits (fig. 4).

MANOVA tests for the hypothesis of no overall ecotype effect indicated significant differences among ecotypes(p-value=<.0001).

Significant differences were observed among ecotypes and rice varieties in morphological (pubescence, hull, bran, auricles, node colors and plant height) and physiological traits (chlorophyll content, heading date, seed shattering and dormancy).

All ecotypes had red pericarp, pubescent leaves, and were all taller than cultivated rice.

All weedy rice ecotypes had lower chlorophyll content or pale green leaves than cultivated varieties.

Blackhull (type 4) and bronzehull (type 2) weedy rice were early flowering type. Medium grain, strawhull (type 3) ecotypes flowered at the same time with cultivated rice varieties while short grain strawhull (type 1) and admixture (type 5) weedy rice were late flowering.

Except for ecotype 5, all weedy rice exhibit high degree of seed shattering and seed dormancy.

Fig. 2. Five weedy rice ecotypes and their distribution by county.

type 1 type 2 M-205type 3 type 4 type 5

Weedy rice ecotype: ecotype 1ecotype 2ecotype 3ecotype 4ecotype 5

Fig. 5. Mean chlorophyll content of CA weedy rice ecotypes and CA cultivated rice varieties (CARV).

A BC D E F

smooth (1)

partially pubescent (2)

Fig. 6. Comparison of weedy rice ecotypes and cultivated rice. A, Plant height during flowering stage. B, Days to flowering. C, Seed shattering measured 35 days after flowering. D, Dormancy test by germination of seeds.

1 2 3 4 short grain (1)

medium grain (2)

long grain (3)

Fig. 3. Morphological traits and their corresponding numerical scores observed among CA weedy rice ecotypes. A, awn length differences. B, grain types. C, node colors. D, leaf sheaths. E, ligule and auricles. F, leaf surface pubescence.

purple node (2)

green node (1)green (1) purple (2)

leaf sheaths

white ligule-green auricles

purple ligule-purple auricles

white ligule-purple auricles

A BC D E F

19<.0001

Plan

t hei

ght (

cm)

1719

<.0001

Days

to h

eadi

ng

0.0125

Brea

king

tens

ile st

reng

th (g

f)18

19

17

37

<.0001

% G

erm

inat

ion

A

B

C

D

pubescent (3)

partially pubescent (2)

not pubescent (1)

<.0001

Chlo

roph

yll c

onte

nt (S

PAD

unit)

CA rice varieties CA weedy rice

N PUB AWN HULL GRAIN BRAN LS AURI LIG NODE CHL PH HD SHAT DORMCARV 6 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 29.5 79.3 62.2 18.5 72.2

Type 1 6 2.5** 1.0 2*** 1** 2*** 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 23.8** 140.2*** 79.8*** 3.7 3.2***

Type 2 18 2.7*** 1.2 3*** 1.9 2*** 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.2 25.8* 121.9*** 58.2 10.6 89.9

Type 3 10 2.0 4*** 2*** 2.0 2*** 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 22.8*** 117.7*** 61.7 4.8 4.6***

Type 4 1 2.0 4*** 4*** 1.0 2*** 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 26.0 99.0 55.0 2.0 27.0

Type 5 11 2.1 2.2 2.2*** 2.3 2.2*** 1.8** 2* 1.2 2.2** 24.7** 107.4*** 68.7 32.1 70.7

Ecotype effect (Pr>F)

<.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 0.0001 0.0039 0.6079 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 0.0125 <.0001

Fig. 4. Population structure of weedy rice ecotypes based on 14 morphological and physiological traits by canonical discriminant analysis.

N, number of rice entries. PUB, pubescence. HULL, hull color. GRAIN, grain type. BRAN, pericarp color. LS, leaf sheath color. AURI, auricle color. LIG, ligule color. NODE, internode color. CHL, chlorophyll content. PH, plant height. HD, days to heading. SHAT, shattering, DORM, percent germination. *Significantly different to CARV at 0.05, **significant at 0.01, and ***significant at 0.0001 probability level.