photoproduction of neutral pion pairs off the proton with the crystal-barrel-detector at elsa
DESCRIPTION
Photoproduction of neutral pion pairs off the proton with the Crystal-Barrel-Detector at ELSA. Michael Fuchs. October 14 th , 2005. Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary. Introduction Experiment Selection Acceptance Problems “Alternative” method Results - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Photoproduction of neutral pion pairs off the proton with the Crystal-Barrel-Detector at ELSA
Michael Fuchs October 14th, 2005
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
➢ Introduction➢ Experiment➢ Selection➢ Acceptance
➢ Problems➢ “Alternative” method
➢ Results➢ Total cross section➢ Differential cross sections➢ Dalitz-Plots
➢ Summary and Outlook
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
Missing resonances
Nucleon resonances Löring, et.al. EPJA10, 309-346 (2001)
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
Crystal-Barrel@ELSA Setup
➢ Tagging System➢ Energy: incoming ➢ Range: 25 – 95 % of Ee-
➢ Inner Detector➢ Charged particle ident.
➢ Crystal Barrel➢ Energy, direction: decay ➢ 1380 CsI(Tl) crystals➢ Covers 98% of 4
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
➢ Cuts on reconstructed information➢ Tagging System
➢ Coincident hit in MWPC and Scintillator
➢ Inner detector➢ At least: 2 of 3 layers
→ Charged Particle
➢ Crystal-Barrel➢ 4 or 5 PEDs
➢ Invariant masses➢ Two invariant masses of two photons:
m() in interval: 134.97 ± 16.00 MeV
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
➢ Decay of baryon resonances in:
➢ (1232) ➢ D
13 (1520)
➢ X (1660)
➢ Cuts on kinematic fit➢ E, p conservation
➢ Confidence Level (PS>1%
➢ Final Cuts➢ CL (p → p 00) > 10%➢ Matching Protons: (p
Inner & p
kin.Fit)
➢ CL (p → p00) > CL (p → p0)
Invariant p0-mass (@ 3.2 GeV)
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
Dalitzplots: m2 (p0) vs m2 (p0)
Clear bandlike structures in Dalitzplot↓
Cascading decays of baryon resonances
1800 < √s < 2000 MeV 2000 < √s < 2200 MeV
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
➢ Problems:➢ Areas with missing Acceptance
➢ Extrapolation necessary
➢ MC events➢ Distribution by phase space➢ Dynamics of reaction not included
➢ 3 particle final states➢ 5 independent variables➢ Automatic Integration
➢ Solution:➢ Use MC-events with correct reaction dynamics
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
➢ Weighting procedure➢ Preparation
➢ Use➢ Original distr. (PS-MC)➢ Target distr. (Correct dynamics)
➢ Create➢ Normalized weights: wnorm
➢ Copy➢ By event➢ Generate random number: r➢ If: wnorm < r
➢ Copy whole eventin new dataset
➢ Next Step:➢ Weight factors using PWA
Normalized weights: wnorm
Original distribution (yellow) Target distribution (orange)
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
➢ Partial wave analysis➢ Determination of resonance properties
➢ Masses➢ Partial widths➢ Coupling constants
➢ Version by A. Sarantsev, U. Thoma et. al.➢ Isobar - model➢ Breit-Wigner (or K-Matrix) parametrization ➢ Unbinned Maximum-Likelihood fit
➢ Event based➢ All correlations correctly taken into account➢ (5 independent variables)
➢ No fitting of projections !!
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
Comparison ofAcceptance:
Phasespace MC
PWA weighted MC
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
Total Cross Section
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
135
0 <
√s
< 1
57
0 M
eV
157
0 <
√s
< 1
80
0 M
eV
180
0 <
√s
< 2
06
0 M
eV
206
0 <
√s
< 2
55
0 M
eV
Differential Cross Section: m(p0)
(1232)
D13(1520) X(1660)
(1232)
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
135
0 <
√s
< 1
57
0 M
eV
157
0 <
√s
< 1
80
0 M
eV
180
0 <
√s
< 2
06
0 M
eV
206
0 <
√s
< 2
55
0 M
eV
Differential Cross Section: m(00)
f0(980)
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
Dalitzplot m2 (p0) vs m2 (p0)
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
➢ Selection➢ Good identification of: p→p00
➢ Acceptance➢ MC contains correct dynamics of reaction
➢ Cross Sections➢ Total and differential cross sections up to E ~ 3 GeV
➢ Data used for Partial Wave Analysis➢ Search for new baryon resonances
➢ Determination of resonance properties: ➢ Masses, Partial widths, Coupling constants
➢ Cascading decays of baryon resonances observed via
➢ (1232)D13
(1520)X(1660)
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary
➢ Acknowledgements
The Crystal-Barrel Collaboration➢ U. Thoma➢ E. Klempt➢ A. Sarantsev
Thank you for your attention!
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary ◦ Add-Ons
Gen MC Rek MC
Yes
Copy
Gen MC Rec MC Acceptance(Phase space)
PWA
4Vec: p, 0, 0
E, ID
Acceptance (PWA weighted)
wnorm
< r
Rndm()
r No
ID, wnorm
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary ◦ Add-Ons
Total cross section @ 1.4 GeV
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary ◦ Add-Ons
Total cross section @ 3.2 GeV
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary ◦ Add-Ons
Differential Cross Section
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary ◦ Add-Ons
Differential cross section: m(p0) for selected energie bins in E
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary ◦ Add-Ons
Differential cross section: m(00) for selected energie bins in E
Introduction ◦ Experiment ◦ Selection ◦ Acceptance ◦ Results ◦ Summary ◦ Add-Ons
Dalitzplot m2 (p0) vs m2 (0)