physic o
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
1/39
| Slide 1 of 39 April 2007
Training Workshop onPharmaceutical Development withfocus on Paediatric Formulations
Protea Hotel
Victoria Junction, Waterfront
Cape Town, South Africa
Date: 16 to 20 April 2007
Pharmaceutical Development
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
2/39
| Slide 2 of 39 April 2007
Physicochemical Properties of APIs
and their relevance to formulation
Presenter: Peter York
Professor of Physical Pharmaceutics
Institute of Pharmaceutical Innovation (IPI),
University of Bradford, UK
(www.ipi.ac.uk)
http://www.ipi.ac.uk/http://www.ipi.ac.uk/ -
8/11/2019 Physic o
3/39
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
4/39
| Slide 4 of 39 April 2007
Sources of APIs - Procurement
Patented compoundsfrom originators or their licenced suppliers
Non-patented APIs and generic APIs
- transition from traditional supplying countries to other
emerging nations eg India, China
- consistency between tender samples and following supplies
from chosen supplier
- pressure regarding CoG issues; no compromise with APIs for
quality and safety
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
5/39
| Slide 5 of 39 April 2007
Specifications and Standards for APIs
API suppliersfor patented compounds
Likely to be licenced manufacturing agreement with originator,
according to originators documentation
Drug Master File (submitted to registration authorities) containing
full details regarding synthesis, testing and analytical procedures,
impurities (sources and limits), storage requirements; drug source
will be originator or their licenced toll manufacturer
Certificate of Analysis provided by API supplier; details results of
routine tests applied to specified batches
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
6/39
| Slide 6 of 39 April 2007
Specifications and Standards for APIs
Specific pharmacopoeial monographs for off-patent/generic APIs
Pharmacopoeias (eg BP) initiate new monographs for APIs
approaching end of patent life, with support/dialogue with originator
companies
USP, EP, Int Ph, and national pharmacopoeia (eg JP, BP)
Additional general guidance chapters and information provided in
pharmacopoeias (eg testing methods..)
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
7/39
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
8/39
| Slide 8 of 39 April 2007
Generalised Content of API Monographs
Increasing awareness of need to monitor physical, crystallographic andfunctional properties some testing required by pharmacopoeial monographs
Such information can provide valuable aid to formulation design
Physical properties
- moisture content
- solid state/crystallography (eg polymorphism, level of solvation,crystalline/amorphous character)
- particle properties (eg particle size)
Storage recommendations
NB indication of availability of reference standards provided
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
9/39
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
10/39
| Slide 10 of 39 April 2007
Pharmacopoeial Monographs for APIs
Assay
- often a precise, non-specific (eg volumetric assay) test detailed
- can use alternative assay method if known that alternative method willgive a result of equivalent accuracy
- purity figure related to reference substance
- local reference material can be used if calibrated against official referencematerial
- limits (range) based on data obtained in normal analytical practice, takinginto account normal analytical errors, and acceptance of some variation inmaterial
eg aspirin99.5101.5% (EP)
eg erythromycinsum of the contents of erythromycin A, B and C- 93.0 to102%, with erythromycin B - maximum 5%, erythromycin C - maximum 5%(EP)
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
11/39
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
12/39
| Slide 12 of 39 April 2007
Erythromycin Molecules- Structure
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
13/39
| Slide 13 of 39 April 2007
Pharmacopoeial Monographs for APIs
Storage recommendations
- to avoid/minimise degradation for sensitive materials
- to avoid/minimise any contamination
- possible vectors leading to degradation - elevated
temperatures, light, oxygen (free radicals), moisture/high
humidity, microorganisms
eg aspirinstore in an air tight container (EP)
eg erythromycin- protect from light (EP)
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
14/39
| Slide 14 of 39 April 2007
API Routine TestingGood Practice
Provide assurance of quality and safety
Verification of CoA and magnitude of testing programme
Sampling programme/isolated quarantine storage areas
Retention/storage of batch samples
Training programmes for staff, SOPs, GLP and validationof methods
Confidence in consistent quality of supply from chosensuppliers
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
15/39
| Slide 15 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesFormulation Design
and Processing
50% of new APIs, and many others, have very low aqueous solubility which canconstrain drug dissolution (ie rate of solution) and thereby limit bioavailability
Many APIs exhibit polymorphism (also solvationhydration)alternativemolecular packing of the same chemical in crystalline material leading to differentproperties such as dissolution rate)
Moisture content controlhygroscopic material often difficult to process (egtabletting); change in hydration state (eg during wet granulation)
Respiratory drug deliveryDPIs and suspension MDIs require drug particle size(aerodynamic) of 15 microns
All above are also examples of QUALITY issues when formulating andprocessing APIs; may require additional testing and/or control procedures
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
16/39
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
17/39
| Slide 17 of 39 April 2007
API Properties - Solubility
Descriptive solubilities
General rules Polar solutes dissolve in polar solvents Non-polar solutes dissolve in non-polar solvents
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
18/39
| Slide 18 of 39 April 2007
API Properties - Solubility
Many drugs are weak acids or weak bases Dissociation (ionisation) constants and pea
Formulation and drug delivery issues pKa of aspirin (weak acid) = 3.5
Change in degree of ionisation and
relative solubility of weakly acidic
and weakly basic drugs as afunction of pH
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
19/39
| Slide 19 of 39 April 2007
API Properties - Polymorphism
e.g carbamazepine, ritonavir
Representation of two
polymorphic forms of a
crystal consisting of a
molecule represented by ahockey-stick shape
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
20/39
| Slide 20 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesCrystallinity
The disruption of a crystal
(represented as a brick wall),
giving the possibility for water
vapour absorption in the
amorphous region
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
21/39
| Slide 21 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesCrystallinity
API pretreatment effects on crystallinity
The amorphous content of a model
drug substance following milling in a
ball mill and a micronizer (Ahmed et
al 1996).
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
22/39
| Slide 22 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesFormulation Design
and Processing
Alternative pre-treatment and processing of APIs (egalternative final solvent used during final crystallisation
step during synthesis of API; use of crystallisation rather
than milling process for particle size reduction ) can lead
to different surface properties of particles, such as
interparticle cohesion and surface charge
These phenomena can lead to different secondary
processing behaviour and potentially variation in product
performance
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
23/39
| Slide 23 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesParticle Size Analysis
Microscopyequivalent diameters
Different equivalent diameters
constructed around the same particle.
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
24/39
| Slide 24 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesParticle Size Analysis
- eye-piece graticule: circles with diameters inprogression
- particle size distribution (number basis) over range
2200 microns
2
Frequency distribution curves corresponding to (a) a normal distribution, (b) a positively
skewed distribution and (c) a bimodal distribution.
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
25/39
| Slide 25 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesParticle Size Analysis
Sieve analysisequivalent diameters
- stack of sieves
- particle size distribution (weight basis) over range501000 microns
Sieve diameter dsfor various
shaped particles
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
26/39
| Slide 26 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesParticle size, drug dissolution and bioavailability
Dissolution is measure of rate of solution Dissolution related to particle size and particle surface area
(smaller particle size, larger surface area, faster dissolution)
= dissolution rate, A = surface area of solid, k = dissolution
rate constant, Cs= saturation of drug, C = concentration of drug insolution)
CCkA
dt
dm
s
dt
dm
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
27/39
| Slide 27 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesParticle Size Reduction
Examples of drugs where a reduction in particle size hasled to improvements in bioavailability
API P ti
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
28/39
| Slide 28 of 39 April 2007
API Properties
Biopharmaceutical Classification Scheme
Valuable classification system to guide formulators in requirements for particleengineering of APIs
Consider aqueous solubility and permeability via oral route of delivery
Class Ihigh solubility, high permeability
- rapid absorption, good bioavailability
- eg propanolol, metaprolol
Class IIlow solubility, high permeability
- API controls absorption; potential for particle size effects onbioavailability
- eg ketoprofen, carbamazepine
API P ti
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
29/39
| Slide 29 of 39 April 2007
API Properties
Biopharmaceutical Classification Scheme
Class III high solubility, low permeability
- APIs dissolve rapidly and poorly absorbed
- require fast API dissolution to maximise absorption
- potential benefits from particle size reduction
eg ranitidine, atenolol
Class IV low solubility, low permeability
- challenging molecules, likely to exhibit low bioavailability
eg hydrochlorothiazide, furosemide,
- option to increase permeability - modify APIs as prodrugs
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
30/39
| Slide 30 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesProdrugs with modified permeability and absorption
Examples of prodrugs with improved permeability andoral absorption
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
31/39
| Slide 31 of 39 April 2007
API Properties and Design of Medicines
Wide range of dosage forms - liquids, semi-solids, solids
Range of administration routes
Medicines containing more than one API
Single unit dosage and multi unit dose systems
Device, administration and compliance issues
All these are issues that can impose requirements fordesired API properties, in addition to chemical qualityand safety assurance
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
32/39
| Slide 32 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesCharacteristics
to be considered when formulating medicines
API P t Cl ifi ti
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
33/39
| Slide 33 of 39 April 2007
API Property Classification
inter-dependencies between groupings
API P ti F l ti D i
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
34/39
| Slide 34 of 39 April 2007
API PropertiesFormulation Design
and Processing
Formulation designdosage form and delivery route issues, and functionalitytests for guiding choice of processing route and conditions
API stability, solubility (dissolution) and particle size are key properties foreffective formulation design
For preparation of solutions, suspensions, granules for reconstitution
- NB attention to stability (chemical and physical) and storage requirements
For solid dosage formseg tablets and capsules
- NB biopharmaceutics classification
- potential for increasing drug dissolution rate
- potential for modifying drug solubility/permability (eg salts, prodrugs)
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
35/39
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
36/39
| Slide 36 of 39 April 2007
Life-Time of APIs
Appropriate specifications must be met throughout life-time of APIto ensure quality and safety
Life-time = from - isolation of API
- API received by product manufacturer fromsupplier
- API processed into pharmaceutical product
- storage period of product (shelf life limit)
to - end of period of administration of product to
patientNB Alternative specifications will apply at the different stages
Challenges for API Procurement
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
37/39
| Slide 37 of 39 April 2007
Challenges for API Procurement
and Evaluation
Compliance with CoA, and/or pharmacopoeial
monograph
Consistency within/between batches, sampling issues
Alternative suppliers and CoG issues
Building confidence in supplying agencies
Quality and safety, quality and safety, quality and safety!!
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
38/39
Physicochemical Properties of APIs
-
8/11/2019 Physic o
39/39
| Slide 39 of 39 April 2007
Physicochemical Properties of APIs
their relevance to formulation
Summary and conclusion
Assurance of quality and safety of APIs
Spectrum of tests and specifications of criteria for APIs
Interdependency between categories of API properties
Functionality testing related to formulation design (and
processing route and conditions)
Summary of challenges in API procurement and in evaluatingAPIs for formulation design