pilot study: feasibility and evaluation a-k. illner 1, u. harttig 1, g. tognon 2, s. salvini 2, p....

22
Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1 , G. Tognon 2 , S. Salvini 2 , P. Amiano 3 , E. Bower 3 , D. Engeset 4 , T. Kaasik 5 , H. Ward 6 1 German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam- Rehbrücke, Germany 2 Cancer Research and Prevention Institute Florence, Italy 3 Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, San Sebastian, Spain 4 University of Tromsoe, Norway 5 University of Tartu, Estonia 6 University of Cambridge, UK

Upload: leo-dale-arnold

Post on 18-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation

A-K. Illner1, U. Harttig1, G. Tognon2, S. Salvini2, P. Amiano3, E. Bower3, D. Engeset4, T. Kaasik5, H. Ward6

1 German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Germany2 Cancer Research and Prevention Institute Florence, Italy3 Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, San Sebastian, Spain4 University of Tromsoe, Norway5 University of Tartu, Estonia6 University of Cambridge, UK

Page 2: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 2

foster scientific knowledge of the design and feasibility of approaches that use multiple dietary assessment instruments, including internet-technologies

objective

Page 3: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 3

completion of a web- or paper-based self-administered European Food Propensity Questionnaire (EFPQ) and three telephone-administered 24 hour dietary recalls (24HDR) in 400 participants from five ongoing cohort studies in Estonia, Italy, Spain, Norway, Germany

analysis of feasibility & comparison to the Calibration of Methods (COM) study conducted in EPIC-Norfolk (UK) with one 24HDR, three 7-day diaries and two FFQs

Design

Page 4: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 4

developed on the basis of a validated German- specific 102-item FFQ applied in the EPIC-Potsdam cohort for the second dietary assessment that was palced on the web

by a web-based working procedure European experts reviewed and modified an English version of the FFQ appropriately to the dietary habits in their countries; the common European version then was translated & placed on the web

final EFPQ asks about the frequency of consumption of 116 foods during the preceding year, demonstrated with graphically displayed portion sizes

Development of web-based EFPQ

reference: https://nugo.dife.de/efbo/portal/en

Page 5: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 5

Hanning, R. M., Woodruff, S. J., Lambraki, I., Jessup, L., Driezen, P., and Murphy, C. C. Nutrient intakes and food consumption patterns among Ontario students in grades six, seven, and eight. Can J Public Health, 98: 12-6, 2007;

Bälter, K., Bälter, O., Fondell, E. and Lagerros, Y. Web-based and mailed questionnaires: a comparison of response rates and compliance. Epidemiology, 16:4 S577-590, 2005.

common 6-languages Food Propensity Questionnaire:English, Italian, Norwegian, Spanish, Basque, Estonian, German

EFPQ: https://nugo.dife.de/efbo/portal/en

Page 6: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 6

source: https://nugo.dife.de/efbo/portal/en

Page 7: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 7

Page 8: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 8

Page 9: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 9

Page 10: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 10

Page 11: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 11

Page 12: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 12

Response & participation rates

Table 1: Total response, participation and % distributions for the European Food Propensity Questionnaire (EFPQ) by IDAMES Center

Page 13: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 13

Reasons for non-participation

*non-participants with indication of reason

21,0

35,5

24,2

19,4

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

30,0

35,0

40,0

45,0

1

rea

so

n o

f n

on

-pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

%)

no interest no time, not availabe health constraints other

n = 62*/138 non-participants

Other: e.g. no internet, no computer

Page 14: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 14

General characteristics

Table 2: general characteristics of web-based EFPQ-users and Paper-EFPQ-users

Page 15: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 15

Participation in 24HDRs

Table 3: participation rates in 24HDRs by IDAMES center

Page 16: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 16

Completion time for web-based EFPQ

0,0

10,0

20,0

30,0

40,0

50,0

60,0

70,0

80,0

< 20 min 20 - <40 min 40 - <60 min 60 - <180 min >180 min

pro

po

rtio

n o

f su

bje

cts

(%)

Florence (I) Potsdam (D) San Sebastian (EE) Tartu (E) Tromsoe (NOR)

N = 26 N = 19 N = 11 N = 65 N = 21

Median completion time: 33.8 min

Page 17: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 17

Subjective completion time of web-based EFPQ

0,0

10,0

20,0

30,0

40,0

50,0

60,0

70,0

80,0

90,0

<20 min 20-<40 min 40-<60 min >=60 min

per

cen

tag

e o

f su

bje

cts

(%)

Florence (I) Potsdam (D) San Sebastian (EE) Tartu (E) Tromsoe (NOR)

N = 26 N = 19 N = 11 N = 65 N = 21

Page 18: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 18

Login counts for web-based EFPQ

0,0

10,0

20,0

30,0

40,0

50,0

60,0

70,0

1 login 2-3 logins 4-5 logins 6-8 logins

Florence (I) Potsdam (D) San Sebastian (EE) Tartu (E) Tromsoe (NOR)

N = 26 N = 19 N = 11 N = 65 N = 21

Page 19: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 19

Missing & implausible data

80-90% of the paper-based EFPQs contained missing or implausible data recontact was needed

30.9% of subjects reported to have diffilculties in estimating their food intake

questions about frequency of consumption about alcohol, mixed dishes

Page 20: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 20

summary

participation rate for the overall approach was moderate and differed between the centres

participation in the 24HDRs decreased accross the data collection rounds

the web-based EFPQ was feasible & flexible in terms of time & completion and well accepted among its users

this study supports the feasibility of using multiple dietary assessment methods within culturally different study populations, including internet- based instruments.

Page 21: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 21

Future perspectives

further development of the EFPQ is needed to refine its methodology for an enlarged application in other countries

generating a better understanding of the desgin and feasibility of approaches with several instruments

which and how many short-term instruments are needed?

Page 22: Pilot study: feasibility and evaluation A-K. Illner 1, U. Harttig 1, G. Tognon 2, S. Salvini 2, P. Amiano 3, E. Bower 3, D. Engeset 4, T. Kaasik 5, H

IDAMES Workshop, ICDAM7 06.04.2009 22

Thank you for your attention!

European Food Propensity Questionnaire/EFPQ : https://nugo.dife.de/efbo/portal/de

All WP5partners:

Heiner Boeing

Ulrich Harttig

Heather Ward

Gianluca Tognon

Simonetta Salvini

Pilar Amiano

Dagrun Engeset

Taie Kaasik