platts methodology and perspectives on bunker …marketexchange.com/2014_platts/day...

25
© 2013 Platts, McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved. Platts Methodology and Perspectives on Bunker Fuel Markets Platts 11 th annual Bunker and Residual Fuel Oil Conference JW Marriott June 24, 2014

Upload: others

Post on 01-Apr-2020

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

© 2013 Platts, McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved.

Platts Methodology and Perspectives on Bunker Fuel Markets Platts 11th annual Bunker and Residual Fuel Oil Conference JW Marriott June 24, 2014

Market Overview

• Physical residual fuel oil market • Residual fuel oil swaps • US bunkers • Latin American bunkers

2

Residual Fuel Oil Swaps

• USAC 1%S fuel oil swaps saw pickup in backwardation in 2014, due to lack of prompt supply

• What caused the supply tightness? – Less LSFO output from Atlantic Coast refineries as result of

more crude throughput with a higher API • Higher API=Less fuel oil

– Increased demand for fuel oil for power generation • USAC experienced one of coldest winters on record • Natural gas prices spiked to as high as $120/MMBtu (around

$670/b)

3

LSFO Backwardation also saw record highs

(1.00)

(0.50)

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

J F M A M

M1-M2 Spread, Atlantic Coast 1%S ($/b)

(1.00)

(0.50)

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

Wider Hi-lo spread for 2014 vs 2013

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

11.00

J F M A M2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

11.00

2013

2014

However….

90.0092.0094.0096.0098.00

100.00102.00104.00106.00108.00110.00

J F M A M90.0092.0094.0096.0098.00

100.00102.00104.00106.00108.00110.00

J F M A M

USAC 1%S M1 Swap Outright Prices

-16-15-14-13-12-11-10

-9-8-7-6-5-4

J F M A M-16-15-14-13-12-11-10

-9-8-7-6-5-4

J F M A M

USAC 1%S M1 Brent Crack Swap

• Outright prices until mid-April in 2014 were lower than in 2013

• Similarly, the USAC 1%S swap in 2014 was relatively weaker to Brent than it was in 2013

Bunkers: US East Coast

• The average spread between IFO 380 CST New York and the front-month Brent crude contract widened 15% from 2013 – $10.98/b, Brent-380 New York, Jan-June 2013 – $12.63/b, Brent-380 New York, Jan-June 2014

• High Sulfur bunker fuel in USAC rebounded in Q2 – Jan-March, 380 CST New York averaged 5% lower than Q1

2013 ($95.87/b) – Apr-Jun, 380 CST New York averaged 3% higher than Q2

2013 ($96.14/b)

7

Brent crude–380 CST NY IFO spread

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

2-Jan-14 2-Feb-14 2-Mar-14 2-Apr-14 2-May-14 2-Jun-14

New York

Brent

New York (2013)

Brent (2013)

Bunkers: US Canada & West Coast

• Sluggish demand edged down HS bunkers at Vancouver/Seattle ports. – Vancouver Jan-Jun avg:

• 2013: $632.50/mt ex-wharf • 2014: $607.90/mt ex-wharf (-3.9%)

– Seattle Jan-Jun avg: • 2013: $618.70/mt ex-wharf • 2014: $591.60/mt ex-wharf (-4.4%)

• The average spread between high sulfur bunkers in Seattle and Vancouver has widened 18% in 2014. – Jan-Jun 2013: 380 CST Van–380 CST Sea = $13.80/mt – Jan-Jun 2014: 380 CST Van-380 CST Sea = $16.30/mt

9

IFO 380 CST Vancouver–Seattle spread

550

570

590

610

630

650

670

690

2-Jan-14 2-Feb-14 2-Mar-14 2-Apr-14 2-May-14 2-Jun-14

Seattle

Seattle 2013

Vancouver

Vancouver 2013

Bunkers: Panama vs Houston

• The spread between the IFO 380 CST Houston price

and IFO 380 CST Balboa will fluctuate due to fierce supplier competition.

• In Q1, IFO 380 CST Panama held a $24.60/mt average premium over IFO 380 CST Houston, due to limited supplies on the wake of loading delays.

• During May, the average premium fell to $10.90/mt, due to low seasonal demand and ample supplies.

• On June 16, IFO 380 CST Panama was at a $2/mt discount to Houston for the first time in the year.

11

Narrowing Houston-Panama spread

12

540

550

560

570

580

590

600

610

620

630

640

2-Jan-14 2-Feb-14 2-Mar-14 2-Apr-14 2-May-14 2-Jun-14

IFO 380 CST Houston

IFO 380 CST Balboa

Platts methodology changes

- Intro to Platts assessments - Changes made in 2014 - Upcoming proposed changes

13

Editorial and market assessments are conducted with complete Independence & Impartiality

Platts – An introduction

Enabling the markets to perform with greater Transparency & Efficiency

Since

Platts – An introduction

New York Denver

Washington Houston

Buenos Aires

London Moscow

Dubai

Beijing

Tokyo Shanghai

Hong Kong

Singapore

Evergreen

Boston

Hightstown Pittsburgh

São Paulo

Lausanne

Platts – An introduction

Cape Town

Houston

ARA (Amsterdam Rotterdam Antwerp)

Singapore

Benchmark Price Assessments – Key spot markets

A robust

How data is analyzed to produce a final value

What is being assessed

How data is collected – Platts Price Discovery Process

Market on Close in Depth – Methodology

must define

What is being assessed

Methodology changes: Portland bunkers

MH1500 SUBSCRIBER NOTE: Platts has reduced Portland bunker volumes effective Feb 3 Houston (Platts)--5Feb2014/1215 pm EST/1715 GMT Platts has amended the volumes reflected in its bunker fuel assessments for Portland, Oregon, to 200-800 mt effective February 3. Previously, volumes reflected in these assessments are 500-2,000 mt. This reduction in the sizes reflected follows feedback to a proposal note Platts published October 15, 2013. The reduction in reflected volumes for both high sulfur bunkers and low sulfur bunkers follows feedback from market suppliers that typical sales and supply volumes generally are in the 200-800 mt range for each stem supplied. Research shows smaller bunker volumes are sold in Portland compared with other US West Coast ports because of draft restrictions along the Columbia River. This update to volumes reflected affects the following high sulfur assessments: ex-wharf 380 CST bunker fuel (Platts market data code PBAAX00), ex-wharf 180 CST bunker fuel (PUADJ00), delivered 380 CST bunker fuel (AAGRO00) and delivered 180 CST bunker fuel (AAGRL00). The following low sulfur assessments also will be affected: ex-wharf 1%S 380 CST bunker fuel (AAWTB00), ex-wharf 1%S 180 CST bunker fuel (AAWSZ00), delivered 1%S 380 CST bunker fuel (AAWTA00) and delivered 1%S 180 CST bunker fuel (AAWSY00). Finally, the following Marine Gasoil assessments will be affected: delivered MGO (AAWYE00) and ex-wharf MDO (AAWYX00). These assessments appear in Platts Bunkerwire and on PGA pages 860 and 862. Please send any further questions and comments to [email protected] and [email protected]

20

Methodology changes: USAC Resid lot size

MH1500 SUBSCRIBER NOTE: Platts changes USAC residual fuel oil cargo size Houston (Platts)--1Apr2014/1227 pm EDT/1627 GMT Following industry feedback, Platts has changed the cargo size considered for assessment of all residual fuel oil cargoes delivered in the US Atlantic Coast with effect from April 1, 2014. Platts initially proposed to amend the size of cargoes reflected in its assessments in a subscriber note published on June 7. Under the change, cargo sizes used for the assessment have been reduced from 120,000 barrels to 50,000 barrels. This move brings Platts assessments more closely in line with current prevailing industry norms. Spot barge availability in the Atlantic Coast has evolved in recent years, as larger barges have typically moved to the US Gulf Coast, leaving smaller barges in the USAC markets. Platts continues to assess the market on a delivered basis. Please send any further comments to [email protected] and [email protected]. For written comments, please provide a clear indication if comments are not intended for publication by Platts for public viewing. Platts will consider all comments received and will make comments not marked as confidential available upon request.

21

Upcoming changes: Tighter 2015 specs

• Ships operating up to 200 nautical miles off of U.S. shores need to comply with 0.1%S in bunker fuel by Jan 2015. All of Platts’ US and Canadian bunker assessments will be affected.

• Given the swing market in Panama, with US fuel ships calling there frequently instead of the USGC, Panama needs to be included although Latin America in general does not fall under ECA.

• Proposal to launch parallel 0.1% S assessments

22

Will new specs be a dirty or clean spec?

Qualities IFO 380CST (Generally follows RMG 380CST) MGO

Approximate Kinematic Viscosity At 50 degrees C, max 380 cst 40 degrees C, 1.5 min CST

Flash point 60 degrees C min 60 degrees C min

Pour point (upper) winter quality 30 C maximum 6 degrees C

summer quality 30 C maximum 0 degrees C

Ash 0.15 m/m maximum 0.01% max

Sulfur maximum 3.5%S 0.1%S

Vanadium max 300 mg/kg -

Aluminium plus silicon 80 mg/kg max -

Cetane index minimum - 40

water 0.5% max -

Zinc - max 15 mg/kg

Phosphorus - max 15 mg/kg

Calcium - max 30 mg/kg

23

LA bunkers – increase delivery dates?

24

450

500

550

600

650

700

Los Angeles Singapore