pmt hv base prototypes evaluation instrumentation workshop lbnl july 23-24, 2003 nobuyoshi kitamura...

12
PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

Upload: lorin-chapman

Post on 17-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation

Instrumentation WorkshopLBNL

July 23-24, 2003

Nobuyoshi KitamuraUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison

SSEC

Page 2: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

Three prototypes

“Old Iseg”—Aug. 2002 prototypes

“New Iseg”—Split ground implemented.

“EMCO”—Passive base approach consisting of three components:Passive base, HV generator, & digital interface.

N. Kitamura 7/23/2003

Jumper pads

Jumper pads

Ribbon connector

Digital interface board

HV generator

Passive base

All designs present the same interface to DOMMB.

Page 3: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

New Iseg--Isolated Ground

Data by John Kelly(hv_2000_iseg_psl.pdf)

Output voltage is unstable with no ground-connecting jumper

N. Kitamura 7/23/2003

Page 4: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

Data by John Kelly(hv_3000_iseg_049.pdf)

New Iseg with a 1M Jumper

The output voltage is stabilized by installing a jumper.

N. Kitamura 7/23/2003

Page 5: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

Connecting Grounds with a Zero Jumper

N. Kitamura 7/23/2003

Page 6: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

Connecting Grounds with a 1M Resister

N. Kitamura 7/23/2003

Page 7: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

Noise Introduced by Digital Communication

This example shows noise from reading the ADC on a new Iseg base with a 1M jumper.

N. Kitamura 7/23/2003

Page 8: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

ISEG OLD ISEG NEW EMCO

NOISE AT OUTPUT*

mVpp 1.22 ± 0.13 1.26 ± 0.13 1.12 ± 0.21

Vrms 214 ± 18 208 ± 18 215 ± 31

*At 50 oscilloscope input using a 50 cable. 100 nsec window (400 pts.)The scope background is 1mVpp, 190Vrms over 100 nsec.

Noise Comparison

All the bases have similar random noise levels observed at the secondary side of the signal coupling transformer.

N. Kitamura 7/23/2003

Page 9: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

POWER

CURRENT (+5V)

CURRENT (-5V)

Power Dissipation

“” disableHV

N. Kitamura 7/23/2003

Page 10: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

Transient Power

ISEG OLD

ISEG NEW

EMCO0.5V, 50nsec

Enable after setting DAC to 4095.Measure across 1Trigger on “enableHV”

N. Kitamura 7/23/2003

?

Page 11: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

Overall Comparison of the Three Prototypes

ISEG OLD ISEG NEW EMCO

NOISE AT OUTPUT*

mVpp 1.22 ± 0.13 1.26 ± 0.13 1.12 ± 0.21

Vrms 214 ± 18 208 ± 18 215 ± 31

1ST DYNODE VOLTAGE FIXED (600V) SCALE WITH OUTPUT

POWER AT MAX OUTPUT (mW) 130 280 250

COST (US$) ~150 ~260 ~600

*At 50 oscilloscope input using a 50 cable. 100 nsec window (400 pts.)The scope background is 1mVpp, 190Vrms over 100 nsec.

N. Kitamura 7/23/2003

Page 12: PMT HV Base Prototypes Evaluation Instrumentation Workshop LBNL July 23-24, 2003 Nobuyoshi Kitamura University of Wisconsin-Madison SSEC

Conclusion

N. Kitamura 7/23/2003

Old Iseg or New Iseg?New Iseg with isolated grounds performs badlyNew Iseg with directly connected grounds performs badlyNew Iseg with 1M jumper performs very similarly to Old IsegOld Iseg is cheaper than New IsegOld Iseg consumes less power then New Iseg

Old Iseg

Iseg or EMCO?Both have similar noise levelsVdy1 is fixed in Iseg approachIseg is cheaper than EMCO

Iseg