policy module

39
Why aren’t we doing enough to stop the biggest problem facing humanity?” [Politics]

Upload: kmblynn

Post on 30-Apr-2015

466 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Policy module

Why aren’t we doing enough to stop the biggest problem facing humanity?”

[Politics]

Page 2: Policy module

Overview1. Who is most responsible?

2. What is a fair response to climate change?

3. What are we already doing?

4. How can we work together to solve the crisis?

Page 3: Policy module

Review• Greenhouse gases affect everyone

• Most emissions come from rich countries

• Impacts will most affect poor countries

• Poor countries’ energy demand is growing quickly – and they are prone to follow the same dirty development path as rich countries

• Need global coordination

Page 4: Policy module

1 Who is most

responsible for climate change?

Answer: Rich countries, especially the U.S.

Page 5: Policy module

5

Rich countries emit far more CO2 total, and per capita than poor countries

Page 6: Policy module

Injustice: So far, rich countries have emitted by far the most, while

experiencing the least impacts from climate change.

Page 7: Policy module

However, developing countries’ emissions are growing rapidly and are

projected to keep growing

Page 8: Policy module

There are two options for poor countries:

1. Follow the dirty development path of rich countries, and put their citizens at risk of dangerous climate change

2. OR3. Invest in a clean energy economy,

creating jobs in new industries and averting the worst impacts of climate change

Page 9: Policy module

2 Given rich countries’

historic responsibility for climate change, and poor countries’ need to lift their people out of poverty, how can we solve the climate crisis?”

What is a fair response to climate change?

Page 10: Policy module

10

A fair response to climate change must…

• Bind rich countries to ambitious and deep cuts in their emissions

• Provide financial support for the poor to adapt to climate change and reduce emissions

• Safeguard the right to (just & sustainable) development

Page 11: Policy module

How much should countries be aiming to reduce emissions by?

• Technically, in a world above 350ppm, we must reduce emissions to zero as quickly as possible to avert the worst impacts

• AOSIS, the Alliance of Small Island States currently calls for the most ambitious targets for rich countries:

• 45% by 2020• 95% by 2050

Page 12: Policy module

Financial support for poor countries for:

– Adaptation: reducing the vulnerability of human and natural systems to climate change

– Mitigation: reducing emissions to curb climate change

– Technology: sharing clean technology with the world

Page 13: Policy module

3 What are

individual countries already doing?

Page 14: Policy module

Developed countries are far from having committed to necessary reductions

Page 15: Policy module

What have the biggest emitters committed to?

U.S. • 17% below 2005 levels by 2020• 83% below 2005 levels by 2050

China• 40-45% below 2005 intensity levels

by 2020• Emissions parallel China’s GDP

Page 16: Policy module

Many developing countries understand the potential impacts,

and so they’re taking more ambitious steps than developed

countries (even though they didn’t cause the problem)

Page 17: Policy module

Countries committed to carbon neutrality:

• Bhutan• Costa Rica• Ethiopia• Maldives• Niue• Papua New Guinea• Samoa

These countries are showing incredible leadership – but they aren’t the biggest emitters.

Page 18: Policy module

“After all, it is not carbon we want but development, it is not coal we want but electricity, it is not oil we

want but transport.”

- President Nasheed of the Maldives

Page 19: Policy module

We’ve seen what we need to do. We’ve seen what we’re actually doing.

Page 20: Policy module
Page 21: Policy module

Developed countries are also far short of raising adaptation and tech transfer

funding

Page 22: Policy module

“In the end, cutting emissions isn’t about who does the most, but whether the total efforts are enough to avoid devastating levels of global warming – we will either sink or swim together. The pledges currently on the table mean we are sinking.”

-Al Gore

Page 23: Policy module

4 How can we

work together to solve the problem?

Page 24: Policy module

UNFCCC, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was created at the Rio Earth Summit

Get rid of Copenhagen here

RIO

Page 25: Policy module

International negotiations have historically taken place in the UNFCCC

“The Parties should protect the climate system for

the benefit of present and future generations of

humankind, on the basis of equity and in

accordance with their common but differentiated

responsibilities and respective capabilities.”

Climate negotiations founding text:

Page 26: Policy module

Climate negotiations timeline

• Visual Timeline with the following events:– 1992: Rio Earth Summit established UNFCCC– 1995: First annual UNFCCC Conference of the Parties (COP)– 1997: Kyoto Protocol signed at COP-3– 2005: Kyoto Protocol takes effect after Russia’s ratification– 2007: COP-13 produces the Bali Roadmap for what should happen at

the end of the Kyoto Protocol’s first commitment period– 2009: COP-15 fails to fulfill the Bali Roadmap; results in Copenhagen

Accord– 2010-2011: Negotiations continue without major shifts or progress

– 2012: First commitment period of Kyoto Protocol to end

Page 27: Policy module

KYOTO PROTOCOL 1997Ratified TreatyDidn’t Ratify

Signed, Ratification PendingNo Position

Page 28: Policy module

Each year there is a two-week Conference of the Parties (COP) to discuss the Kyoto Protocol and negotiate the next treaty

COP 12 Montreal, Canada 2005

Page 29: Policy module

DECEMBER 2009

2009’s COP in Copenhagen was an important conference in which

governments were supposed to agree to new terms for a treaty as the Kyoto Protocol’s first term ends in 2012.

Page 30: Policy module

117 of the most vulnerable island and African nations were supporting

350ppm treaty, saying it is 'necessary for their survival’,

Page 31: Policy module

…yet they were not the 117 that have the power. The biggest, most

powerful emitters were not ready to really take action.

Page 32: Policy module

The single biggest problem country is the US, which is the largest

cumulative emitter in the world

Page 33: Policy module

Other key “blocking” countries include:- Russia- Canada

- Saudi Arabia & other OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum

Exporting Countries)

Page 34: Policy module

Instead of a treaty, we got the “Copenhagen Accord” – a political document with no binding goals

Page 35: Policy module

- Fossil fuel companies have too much power

- U.S. does not have the political will to make real emissions cuts

- Major developing economies like China and India are reluctant to commit to binding targets

Why can’t we agree?

Page 36: Policy module

5 What are some possible

solutions?

Page 37: Policy module

-Fight for action within each of our countries, especially the USA

-Ensure that politicians see climate action as being in their interest.

-Continue to fight for a binding global treaty

We must:

Page 38: Policy module

AND BE PART OF A

GROWING GLOBAL

CLIMATE MOVEMENT

Page 39: Policy module

More Information

• Oxfam International• Environmental Protection Agency• U.S. Department of Energy• United Nations Environment Programme• Global Environmental Facility• UNFCCC