post-ingestion metabolism of fresh forage

Upload: pedro41

Post on 03-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    1/19

    REVIEW New Phytol. (2000), 148, 3755

    Tansley Review No. 118

    Post-ingestion metabolism of fresh forage

    A . H . K I N G S T O N -S M I T H * M . K . T H E O D O R O U

    Department of Animal Science and Microbiology, Institute of Grassland and

    Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, UK

    Received 28 October 1999; accepted 12 June 2000

    Summary 37

    I. 37

    II.

    :

    39

    III. - :

    41

    1. Summary of plant cell death processes 41

    2. Anaerobic stress and flooding tolerance of

    plants 42

    It is generally assumed that breakdown of plant material in the rumen is a process mediated by gut

    microorganisms. This view arose because of the identification of a pre-gastric fermentation in the rumen, brought

    about by a large and diverse microbial population. The extensive use of dried and ground feed particles in forage

    evaluation might have helped to promote this assumption. However, although the assumption might be correctin animals feeding on conserved forage (hay and silage) where the cells of ingested forage are dead, it is possible

    that with grazed (living) forage, the role played by plant enzymes in the rumen has been overlooked. In a grazing

    situation, plant cells that remain intact on entering the rumen are not inert, but will respond to the perceived

    stresses of the rumen environment for as long as they are metabolically viable. Metabolic adjustments could

    include anaerobic and heat-shock responses that could promote premature senescence, leading to remobilization

    of cell components, especially proteins. Moreover, contact of plant cells with colonizing microorganisms in the

    rumen might promote a type of hypersensitive response, in much the same way as it does outside the rumen. After

    fresh plant material enters the rumen and prior to extensive plant cell-wall degradation, there is often a phase of

    rapid proteolysis providing N in excess of that required to maintain the rumen microbial population. The

    inefficient use of this ingested N results in generation of ammonia and urea in exhaled breath and urine, which

    promotes welfare and environmental pollution concerns. Therefore an important research goal in livestock

    agriculture is to find ways of decreasing this initial rate of proteolysis in the rumen. This will benefit the farmer

    financially (through decreased use of feed supplements), but will also benefit the environment, as N pollution can

    adversely affect pasture diversity and ecology. This review considers the possible responses of plant metabolism

    to the rumen environment, and how such considerations could alter current thinking in ruminant agriculture.

    Key words: forage, proteolysis, protease, heat shock, anaerobic, senescence, rumen.

    I.

    Livestock farming is essential in sustaining tra-

    ditional landscapes and wildlife, particularly in

    Europe. Large areas of land exist as permanent or

    *Author for correspondence (fax j44 1970 828357; e-mailalison.kingston-smith!bbrsc.ac.uk).

    3. Plant cell responses to elevated

    temperatures 45

    4. Wounding responses\pathogen attachment 455. Senescence in the rumen? 47

    IV. 50

    Acknowledgements 51

    References 51

    improved pastures and are sown with forage crops

    such as grasses, clovers and other forage legumes to

    feed ruminants throughout the production cycle. In

    response to market pressure towards acceptable

    environmental practices, improved traceability and

    food safety, farming practices are becoming less

    intensive. Although there are now financial

    incentives, such as premium prices for organically

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    2/19

    38 REVIEW A. H. Kingston-Smith and M. K. Theodorou

    Time

    Protein

    Energy

    Fig. 1. Asynchrony in forage degradation by ruminants. Aschematic representation of the mismatch in the timing ofpeaks of protein degradation (indicated by release ofammonia) and energy (indicated by breakdown of cell-walloligosaccharides).

    produced meat and milk, new and improved grass-

    land technologies are required to facilitate the

    changes back to more sustainable systems of ru-

    minant agriculture.

    Grassland-based systems of ruminant production

    are characterized by the biological inefficiency of

    converting plant biomass (relatively low in protein)

    to animal product (relatively high in protein). In

    addition, only c. 2030% of the ingested N can be

    traced through to meat or milk (Dewhurst et al.,

    1996; Firkins, 1996). Ruminant farming generates

    vast quantities of ammonia (Siddons et al., 1985)

    through an imbalance of release of proteolytic

    products from the plant biomass, and the availability

    of microbial energy generated by cellulolysis (the

    asynchrony hypothesis) (Fig. 1). This means that,

    in an environment where energy is limiting but thereis an excess of peptides and amino acids of plant

    origin, the rumen microbial population uses amino

    acids for energy and liberates ammonia through

    deamination. In grazing ruminants, the first few

    hours after feeding are characterized by rapid and

    extensive proteolysis in the rumen, liberating plen-

    tiful peptides and amino acids for uptake by the

    rumen microbial population. According to Beever et

    al. (1986), up to 35% of N lost from the rumen can

    be accounted for by ammonia production in excess of

    that assimilated by rumen microorganisms. Am-

    monia cannot be used by the animal for growth, andis therefore eliminated in faeces, urine and exhaled

    breath (Wetherall et al., 1995). The basic inefficiency

    of N use is often overcome on farms by protein

    supplementation. In the past, bone or fish meal was

    used in addition to sources of plant proteins, but

    following bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)

    the industry is searching for more natural ways to

    improve protein supply, such as the use of high-

    protein leguminous forage crops in addition to grass

    and cereals. However, supplementation in any form

    exacerbates the problems of pollution of land,

    watercourses and air that are direct consequences of

    intensive systems of livestock agriculture.

    Management of grassland and rumen efficiency

    have consequences beyond the welfare and per-

    formance of the animal. Poor grassland management

    can disrupt native ecosystems, whereas good man-

    agement can resist the appearance of invasive species.

    Long-term N deposition, as manure or through

    application of chemical fertilizer, results in the

    presence of excessive nitrate and ammonia in grazing

    land. This has a negative effect on the diversity ofplant communities because selection pressure is

    exerted in favour of species which are tolerant of

    high N, but which are not necessarily characteristic

    of the pasture (Bobbink et al., 1998). This can be

    prevented to some extent by a change in grassland

    management practice, for instance the use of mixed

    grass\clover swards to decrease nitrate run-off

    (Cuttle & Scholefield, 1995). Atmospheric ammonia

    can result in plant damage and contributes to

    reduced plant biodiversity in natural systems

    (McGinn & Janzen, 1998). Ammonia is considered

    to be an acidifying pollutant to which some plant

    species are naturally more susceptible than others.

    The exact mechanism of ammonia toxicity is still not

    clear, although assimilation of ammonia by leaves

    releases protons which can cause cellular acidosis

    (Pearson & Stewart, 1993). In addition, ammonia

    emissions from manure coincide with odours, which

    can be a problem in areas of intensive livestock

    farming (McGinn & Janzen, 1998). Minimizing the

    emissions of ammonia from manure will substan-

    tially decrease the impact of agriculture on the

    surrounding environment.

    According to Nugent & Mangan (1981), increasing

    the stability of plant protein over the first 2 h ofincubation in the rumen would noticeably improve

    N-use efficiency. Numerous attempts have been

    made to manipulate protein and energy supply,

    usually directed at the microbial population

    (Broderick & Buxton, 1991; Flint, 1997; Rooney et

    al., 1997; Gordon & Phillips, 1998; Forsberg et al.,

    1999; Wallace et al., 1999), and rarely at the plant.

    One exception is the potential use of tannins as

    protein protectants during feeding (Theodorou et

    al., 2000). Many plant species contain intrinsically

    differing amounts and types of hydrolysable and

    condensed tannin. Tannin in feedstuff is believed tocomplex with proteins inhibiting their degradation

    in the rumen (Feeney, 1969), although an excess of

    tannin can result in inhibition of microbial and

    mammalian digestive enzymes (Swain, 1979;

    Theodorou et al., 2000). The precise action of

    tannins during digestion or protection of forage

    protein is unclear at present. As discussed by

    Theodorou et al. (2000), it is theoretically possible

    for tannins to bind to forage proteins, extracellular

    microbial proteases or plant proteases. Tannins are

    located in vacuoles, as is the majority of the protease

    pool. Assuming that they are both in the same type

    of vacuole (Swanson et al., 1998), the formation of

    tanninprotease complexes could occur before ac-

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    3/19

    REVIEW Post-ingestion metabolism of forage 39

    tivation or access of vacuolar proteases to protein

    substrates (sections III.1, .4 and .5). Regulation of

    the formation of proteintannin complexes is com-

    plicated, involving the size, conformation and

    amino-acid content of proteins, and the molecular

    weight, stereochemistry and composition of the

    tannins (Mehansho et al., 1983 ; Spencer et al., 1988;

    Butler, 1989). Future research in this area willundoubtedly be important in manipulating protein

    stability in the rumen.

    Enhancing rumen efficiency will result in effec-

    tively converting more plant protein to animal

    protein per unit of livestock, and this will bring

    considerable benefits to the environment, helping to

    maintain rural infrastructure and a countryside that

    is attractive to visitors. By identifying and using

    novel forages in grassland-based systems, farming

    practices could be developed to significantly improve

    the efficiency of meat and milk production from

    grazed and conserved forage. Thus the correctidentification of factors determining rates of degra-

    dation of cell-wall and protein components of plant

    cells is of vital importance. We discuss the currently

    accepted model of plant-cell degradation in the

    rumen, and suggestions for modifications to the

    model in the light of experimental evidence. Our

    conclusions support a role for plant enzymes in the

    processes culminating in release of plant-cell com-

    ponents within the rumen.

    I I. :

    Grazing cattle and sheep excise the leaves, and

    portions of stem, from forage crops. These are

    chewed briefly, rolled into a bolus and swallowed

    into the rumen. Plant material entering the rumen is

    not a homogeneous mass, although it undergoes

    significant processing after excision from the main

    plant. In sheep feeding on grass, half the ingested

    matter has a particle size of4 mm, whereas cattle

    often ingest entire, intact leaf blades (Fraser &

    Baker, 1998; Davies et al., 2000). Particle size also

    depends on plant species. Swallowed particles of

    grass are generally larger than those of dicoty-ledonous plants (Penning et al., 1995 ; Baumont,

    1996), but even the relatively small particle size

    allows many cells to be intact and in communication

    with neighbouring cells and their environment

    (Wilson & Mertens, 1995). Our recent work with

    cattle suggests that, although there is extensive

    processing to form a feed bolus (usually 510 g fresh

    grass per bolus), 50% of the cells are intact (A.

    Kingston-Smith, unpublished), with the residual

    plant cellular material having been released into the

    rumen milieu. Under normal conditions, plant

    biomass can reside in the rumen for up to 24 h,

    depending on particle size (Theodorou & France,

    1993). During the course of this incubation, cell

    walls are degraded and proteins are cleaved to

    peptides and amino acids. The size of the forage

    particles is decreased through mechanical forces of

    movement of the rumen walls, but largely through

    the process of rumination, the regurgitation and

    rechewing of ingested plant biomass.

    Dogma in ruminant science states that the rumen

    microflora, a diverse population of anaerobic bac-teria, fungi and protozoa, colonize newly ingested

    plant material, degrading plant cell walls and

    proteins to liberate building blocks for microbial

    growth (Hobson, 1988; Flint, 1997). It is this

    microbial population which ultimately provides

    much of the energy and N requirements of the

    animal: energy being derived from the volatile fatty

    acid fermentation products of plant biomass (ab-

    sorbed from the rumen), and N from the degradation

    of microbial biomass in the abomasum (the true

    stomach and site of gastric digestion in ruminants).

    Hence digestion of plant material in the rumen feedsthe microbial population and provides the animal

    with an energy supply, whereas the digestion of

    predominantly microbial protein in the true stomach

    provides the animal with protein (Theodorou et al.,

    1996).

    Proteolytic enzymes have been identified in the

    rumen microbial population, and in numerous cases

    their production has been ascribed to certain rumen

    microorganisms (Wallace & Cotta, 1988; Attwood &

    Reily, 1995; Forsberg et al., 1999; Wallace et al.,

    1999). According to Wallace & Cotta (1988), between

    30 and 50% of the bacterial species of the rumen

    ecosystem show proteolytic activity towards extra-

    cellular protein, yet proteolytic bacteria constitute

    only 2226% of the entire population of rumen

    microorganisms (Dehority & Orpin, 1988). Rumen

    microorganisms can use either organic or inorganic

    forms of N for growth, and one of the main enzyme

    activities recognized is the dipeptidase found in the

    genus Prevotella (Flint, 1997; Wallace et al., 1999),

    species of which preferentially take up peptides

    rather than amino acids. Thus, to satisfy the needs of

    the animal, the rumen microbial population relies on

    a plentiful supply of ammonia and pre-formed amino

    acids for rapid growth (Wallace et al ., 1999).However, although initial chewing will damage some

    plant cells, the majority of the cells entering the

    rumen are contained in large particles in which a

    significant proportion of cells remain intact. Thus

    for microbially mediated proteolysis to occur, plant

    cell walls must first be breached in order to provide

    the microbial enzymes access to otherwise seques-

    tered plant proteins. An association between mi-

    crobial enzyme and plant substrate is made all the

    more difficult because microbial proteolytic activity

    is located on the microbial cell surface, thereby

    requiring close contact between microorganism and

    plant cell for proteolysis to proceed (Wallace et al.,

    1999). Variations in the susceptibility of plant

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    4/19

    40 REVIEW A. H. Kingston-Smith and M. K. Theodorou

    Fig. 2. Potential effectors of protein turnover in forage cells entering the rumen.

    proteins to degradation by proteolytic enzymes are

    recognized, and are believed to be due to the type

    and extent of cross-linking, complexing with tannins,

    and other chemical modifications (Wallace et al.,

    1999; Theodorou et al., 2000). However, protection

    afforded by the effective sequestration of proteins

    within cells is not usually considered. In a recent

    review of microscopic studies, Grenet (1997) esti-mated that colonization of newly ingested feed took

    place by bacteria at 8 h, by protozoa after 2 h, and by

    fungal spores after 15 min, but these spores then

    took 3 h or more to germinate and produce hyphae to

    degrade plant cell walls, depending on the degree of

    lignification of the forage. These observations on the

    length of time taken for microbial colonization are in

    line with the general view that cellulolysis in the

    rumen is not as rapid as proteolysis. Several potential

    plant responses to the rumen environment are likely

    to occur within these time scales. For instance,

    closure of stomata in response to perceived floodingwould occur in a matter of minutes (Vartapetian &

    Jackson, 1997). This would prevent access of

    invasive microorganisms through stomata, although

    access through cut edges is still possible. The

    invasion route (stomata or cut ends) probably

    depends on the type of grazing animal: the pro-

    portion of cut ends in the feed bolus of cattle would

    be substantially lower than the number of cut ends in

    plant material ingested by sheep (Fraser & Baker,

    1998; D. Davies, A. Kingston-Smith, unpub-

    lished).

    In addition to the physical considerations of

    microbial invasion of ingested plant material, the

    effectiveness of microbially mediated proteolysis

    needs to be examined. In comparison with the

    animals own gastric secretions of proteases, the

    proteolytic activity of the rumen microbial popu-

    lation is low, and the majority is intracellular

    (Wallace & Cotta, 1988; Asoa et al., 1993; Falconer

    & Wallace, 1998). In the case of the protozoa,

    proteolytic activity is directed against the degra-

    dation of ingested bacterial cells (Wallace & Cotta,1988). Moreover, microbial proteolytic activity is

    routinely measured in vitro by assessing growth on,

    and\or degradation of, either dried, ground plant

    substrates or purified proteins, rather than proteins

    sequestered in living plant cells. According to

    Wallace et al . (1999), the majority of rumen

    proteolytic activity is exopeptidase in nature,

    whereby cleavage is via the terminal amino acid only.

    Thus the values obtained by supplying microbial

    enzymes with a purified, soluble (artificial ) sub-

    strate such as casein might overestimate the true

    value when supplied with mixed plant protein inwhich N-termini for peptidase attack might be

    protected and not accessible. Nevertheless, on the

    basis of such evidence it was concluded that

    degradation of plant biomass in the presence of

    rumen fluid was mediated by microorganisms. This

    might well be the case for conserved (dead) feeds

    such as hay and silage, where much of the degra-

    dation of plant proteins has already occurred under

    the influence of plant proteases in the silo (for silage)

    or standing crop (for hay; Merry et al., 2000); but it

    probably underestimates the contribution of the

    plant enzymes ingested with fresh forage

    (Theodorou et al., 1996).

    There is increasing evidence that plant enzymes

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    5/19

    REVIEW Post-ingestion metabolism of forage 41

    within the rumen make an active contribution to the

    initial stages of protein degradation. Even where

    plant cells are ruptured during chewing and initial

    digestion, their enzymes might still contribute to the

    degradative processes in the rumen. Indeed,

    although the survival of liberated plant enzymes

    might be short-lived in the rumen, the elevated

    temperatures of the rumen environment mightenhance their activities. Plants have evolved a range

    of responses to a fluctuating environment. The main

    stresses perceived by plant cells in the rumen are lack

    of oxygen, elevated temperature, darkness and the

    presence of a large microbial population (Fig. 2). It

    is reasonable to expect that plant cell death, as a

    response to these stresses, influences protein turn-

    over rate through de novo synthesis of proteases or

    post-translational modification of existing proteases.

    Initial evidence in favour of plant-mediated pro-

    teolysis in the rumen comes from the work of Zhu et

    al. (1999). When grass was incubated anaerobicallyat 39mC for several hours in the presence of an active

    population of rumen microorganisms, there was a

    decrease in abundance of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate

    carboxylase\oxygenase (Rubisco) large subunit,

    similar to that observed after similar incubations in

    which microorganisms were absent (Zhu et al.,

    1999). This implies that the common factor, the

    plant enzymes of the fresh grass, were responsible

    for the major portion of proteolysis.

    Plants contain a wide array of proteases, par-

    ticularly aminopeptidases (and often the respective

    inhibitors) for different functions and in different

    locations (Feller, 1986; Moslov, 1995 ; Vierstra,

    1996; Distefano et al., 1997 ; Clarke, 1999). Protease

    activity is required by plants for a variety of

    functions, dissolution of storage proteins during

    seed germination, protein turnover, degradation of

    misformed or damaged proteins (the constitutive

    housekeeping proteases which might occur in

    organelles or within lytic vacuoles), and finally the

    induction of proteases to remobilize valuable N

    during senescence. These processes are controlled

    both during transcription, and later through post-

    translational modification. Hence it is important to

    understand the metabolic processes occurring withinthe newly ingested plant cells in order to identify

    factors responsible for plant-mediated proteolysis in

    the rumen.

    III. - :

    1. Summary of plant cell death processes

    Cell death in plants is a valuable mechanism for the

    survival of the whole organism, just as unchecked

    cell proliferation in animals is prevented by apoptosis

    (Vaux, 1993). Whereas apoptosis in mammals is now

    a well understood phenomenon, it is less so in plants,

    mainly because there are various forms of cell death,

    for example, programmed cell death in organo-

    genesis, necrosis and senescence (Beers, 1997;

    Pennell & Lamb, 1997; Buckner et al., 1998). Using

    the animal system as a model, homologues to the

    defender against apoptotic death (dad) gene have been

    discovered in pea and maize (Gray et al., 1997;

    Orzaez & Granell, 1997). The presence of this genein both animals and plants is not surprising, as this

    gene has been shown to code for an oligosaccharide

    transferase (Kelleher & Gilmore, 1997) essential for

    glycoprotein synthesis. However, the functional

    significance ofdad, and glycosylation, in cell death in

    plants remains to be elucidated. Programmed cell

    death induced by ageing, stress and pathogen attack

    results in common responses such as upregulation of

    cytochrome P%&!

    expression (Godiard et al., 1998)

    and increased protease activity (Minami & Fukuda,

    1995; Drake et al., 1996; Ye & Varner, 1996 ; Beers

    & Freeman, 1997; Gan & Amasino, 1997). Inanimals, the caspase subfamily of the cysteine

    proteases plays a key role in apoptotic cascade

    signalling, together with the appropriate regulatory

    signals (Vaux, 1993; Noode! n et al., 1997). Caspases

    are a group of cysteine proteases which cleave

    exclusively after aspartic acid (Cohen, 1997).

    Cysteine proteases are implicated in cell death in

    senescent tissues (Smart, 1994; Morris et al., 1996;

    Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997; Del Pozo & Lam, 1998;

    Guerrero et al., 1998; Xu & Chye, 1999), but only

    limited evidence in favour of involvement of

    caspases. Thomas & Donnison (2000) have reported

    evidence that the maize SEE2, a senescence-

    enhanced cysteine protease of the legumain family, is

    part of a proteolytic cascade. Peptide inhibitors of

    caspases have varying effectiveness in inhibition of

    hypersensitive cell death in plants (Pontier et al.,

    1999; Yano et al., 1999). Chemical inhibition of

    serine proteases has been shown to inhibit a specific

    type of cell death (a nonpathogen-induced hyper-

    sensitive response) that would otherwise result from

    application of exogenous hydrogen peroxide (Yano

    et al., 1999). This work also showed that the serine

    proteases were involved during the first 4 h of

    programmed cell death, and suggested a regulatoryfunction for this class of enzymes (Yano et al., 1999).

    Likewise, cells in which cysteine proteases have been

    induced as a result of oxidative stress can be rescued

    from death by cystatin (cysteine protease inhibitor)

    treatment (Solomon et al., 1999). Hence the balance

    between protease activity and the presence of

    inhibitors must be a vital factor in determining the

    onset and progression of cell death. Other elements

    must be common, given recent evidence in which

    transgenic plants were constructed to express bcl-xL,

    an inhibitor of apoptosis, which also conferred

    protection against senescence and oxidative cell

    death in tobacco (Mitsuhara et al., 1999). In the

    converse experiment, plants expressing Bax, a pro-

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    6/19

    42 REVIEW A. H. Kingston-Smith and M. K. Theodorou

    moter of animal cell death, appeared to activate an

    endogenous cell death response (Lacomme & Santa

    Cruz, 1999). Also, plant cells undergoing hyper-

    sensitive cell death can cleave poly(ADP-ribose)

    polymerase (PARP), an indicator of apoptotic cell

    death, through induction of cysteine protease activity

    (DSilva et al., 1998). Visual similarities between

    apoptosis and programmed cell death in plantsinclude changes to cytoplasmic morphology

    (vacuolarization) and cleavage of nuclear DNA

    (Thelen & Northcote, 1989; Ryerson & Heath,

    1996; Mittler et al., 1997; OBrien et al., 1998; Yen

    & Yang, 1998). The involvement of calcium as an

    intermediate in the signal transduction pathway also

    appears to be a common theme amongst cell death

    pathways.

    The role of oxidative signalling in plant cell death

    processes has been well established, especially in the

    area of pathogen infection and the hypersensitive

    response (Mittler & Lam, 1995; Allan & Fluhr,

    1997; Morel & Dangl, 1997). Certain enzymic

    components of the antioxidant defences (most no-

    tably catalase and glutathione-S-transferase) are

    increased during senescence (Buchanan-Wollaston,

    1997) and could be important in tolerance to

    waterlogging-induced anaerobic stress in roots

    (Chirkova et al., 1998). The active synthesis of

    proteases is a rapid response which occurs approx.

    30 min after application of exogenous hydrogen per-

    oxide (Solomon et al., 1999). This suggests a role for

    oxidative signalling in the regulation of senescence.

    This is entirely consistent with observations of

    increased lipid peroxidation which preceded visiblesigns of senescence in detached and darkened maize

    leaves (Hung & Kao, 1997). The significance of

    oxidative signalling in the current context is unclear,

    however. Plant tissues entering the rumen are

    aerated, containing oxygen within and between cells,

    and also some air must be taken into the animals

    mouth with the forage. This oxygen will surely be

    available for utilization by plant metabolic processes

    (section III.2). On the other hand, if the generation

    of active oxygen is a prerequisite for cell death, a

    proportion of the available oxygen might be used in

    this manner, and hence increased antioxidant statusin plants might extend the interval before cell death

    in the rumen occurs. According to Solomon et al.

    (1999), the extent of oxidative stress in plants might

    determine the type of cell death ensuing. A rapid and

    extensive accumulation of active oxygen species

    results in uncontrolled (necrotic) cell death, whereas

    developmental or adaptive cell death (such as occurs

    in the formation of xylem) ensues after a slower

    accumulation of active oxygen species that never-

    theless exceeds a threshold level. It follows that the

    persistence of oxygen within plant tissue after entry

    into the rumen will largely determine the efficacy of

    oxidative signalling and hence the induction of cell

    death in ingested forage. Some recent evidence

    challenges this view, since it has revealed that cell

    death can occur even when the generation of an

    oxidative burst has been suppressed (Pallardy et al.,

    1997; Yano et al., 1999). Likewise, in the presence of

    xylanase, cultured tobacco cells undergo a hyper-

    sensitive response and subsequent cell death (note

    that rumen bacteria posses many forms of xylanase

    activity, Forsberg et al., 1999). Although the oxi-dative burst maxima at 23 h post-elicitation were

    prevented by treatment of cell cultures with catalase,

    cell death still ensued (Yano et al., 1999).

    2. Anaerobic stress and flooding tolerance of plants

    Probably the most significant difference between the

    normal environment of plants and the rumen is the

    lack of oxygen. Rumen microorganisms are pre-

    dominantly obligate anaerobes, so are killed on

    exposure to oxygen. Thus it is essential for the

    rumen to be highly anoxic. This is achieved largely

    through the fermentative metabolism of the mi-

    crobial population and their production of highly

    reduced end products, and possibly also through the

    action of facilitative anaerobes which scavenge

    available oxygen. In this respect, the newly ingested

    plant tissues do not undergo a gradual loss of

    environmental oxygen, but are subjected to a sudden

    transfer to an anoxic atmosphere, the only oxygen

    present being that contained within the tissues. As

    noted by Ricard et al. (1994), situations in which

    plant material truly undergoes a rapid switch from

    aerobic to anaerobic conditions are rare. The most

    studied anaerobic situation is waterlogging (Ricardet al., 1994), in which oxygen is gradually depleted

    (hypoxia) prior to complete reliance on fermentative

    generation of ATP (anoxia). It has been known for a

    long time that exposure of plant tissues (especially

    roots) to hypoxia can precondition plant cells, thus

    improving metabolic tolerance to a subsequent

    period of anoxic treatment when compared with

    tissues exposed directly to anoxia (reviewed by

    Drew, 1997). Therefore the lack of the hypoxic

    preconditioning period for plant tissue entering the

    rumen is likely to result in a rapid loss of viability.

    Continued energy supply is crucial to cell survival.Plants are adapted to an aerobic environment and

    rely on respiration to supply ATP from glucose.

    However, approx. 15 min after transfer to anaerobic

    conditions, roots become ATP-limited (Raymond et

    al., 1985). Damage to mitochondria induced by

    anaerobic conditions included swelling (in a few

    minutes) and changes in membrane lipid compo-

    sition, although mitochondria maintained anaer-

    obically were capable of respiration if supplied with

    ATP (Andreev et al., 1991; Couee et al., 1992).

    When the oxygen supply is exhausted, metabolism

    switches to fermentation via substrate-level

    phosphorylation in an attempt to maintain ATP

    production (Perata & Alpi, 1993; Drew, 1997).

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    7/19

    REVIEW Post-ingestion metabolism of forage 43

    Theoretically, 32 mol ATP can be supplied from

    each mol glucose, but recent estimates suggest that

    only half of the mitochondrial electron transport is

    actually used for glycolysis (Rawyler et al., 1999).

    Even this lowest estimate exceeds the capacity of

    ATP generation through ethanolic fermentation

    (2 mol ATP per mol glucose), implemented due to

    lack of oxygen. In practice this means that cells cansurvive for a certain period before metabolism is

    seriously hampered. For example, potato cells in

    culture showed no membrane damage for the first 12 h

    after imposition of anaerobic stress (Rawyler et al.,

    1999). Thereafter, free fatty acids accumulated in the

    potato cells coincident with the calculated energy

    supply decreasing to 12% of the aerobic maximum.

    This was despite increases in ethanol and lactate

    which indicated active fermentation (Rawyler et al.,

    1999). From this, and studies with inhibitors, it was

    suggested that there is a threshold of ATP pro-

    duction of approx. 10 mol g"

    f. wt h"

    , below whichmembrane structure cannot be preserved (Rawyler

    et al., 1999). The restricted ATP supply also has

    direct implications for proteolysis. The cytosolic

    serine protease from lettuce (LoPiero & Petrone,

    1999), the 26S proteosome which appears to operate

    in cytoplasm and the nucleus of most eukaryotes

    (Vierstra, 1996), and the ClpP homologues in the

    cytosol (Clarke, 1999) all require ATP to function.

    Hence the major protease activities in ingested plant

    cells in the rumen are likely to be ATP-independent.

    Induction of anaerobic responses involves de novo

    synthesis of the anaerobic response proteins, most

    notably isoforms of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)

    and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) specific to an-

    aerobic stress (Perata & Alpi, 1993 ; Drew, 1997 ;

    Vartapetian & Jackson, 1997; Kato-Noguchi, 1999).

    Synthesis of these specific proteins increases despite

    an initial decrease in total protein synthesis caused

    by disassociation of ribosomes (Bailey-Serres &

    Freeling, 1990). In addition to ADH and LDH,

    other proteins and transcripts are upregulated in

    response to anaerobic stress, but with roles in the

    anaerobic stress response that have yet to be clearly

    defined. Different isoforms can be expressed selec-

    tively in roots or leaves in response to anaerobicstress, and these activities appear to be an intrinsic

    and essential part of the anaerobic response mech-

    anism. Interestingly, mRNA accumulation often

    exceeds that accounted for by amino-acid flux

    through the protein (Ricard et al., 1994), and does

    not prevent significant accumulation of potentially

    toxic ethanol (Good & Muench, 1993; Ricard et al.,

    1994; Dolferus et al., 1997; Kato-Noguchi, 1998 ;

    Matsumura et al., 1998).

    The best documented pathway of the change from

    aerobic to anaerobic metabolism is given by the

    DaviesRoberts pH stat theory. Increased activity of

    lactate dehydrogenase converts pyruvate (last step in

    glycolysis not requiring oxygen) to lactate. The

    accumulation of lactate, and ATP restriction of the

    operation of the tonoplast proton pumps, results in a

    pH decline from 7n3 t o 6n8 over approx. 20 min

    (Drew, 1997). This effectively decreases the cytosolic

    pH below the pH optimum of LDH, but within the

    range of pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC), the first

    enzyme of ethanolic fermentation (Fox et al., 1995).

    There might also be some form of negative feedbackin which acidosis is prevented by gradual loss of

    affinity of LDH for NADH as pH drops (Drew,

    1997; OCarra & Mulcahy, 1997). This converts

    pyruvate to acetaldehyde, which is then converted to

    ethanol by alcohol dehydrogenase. Both LDH and

    ADH require NADH as a cofactor in the reactions.

    A recent estimate puts the flux of carbon through

    LDH as accounting for only about 12% of the total

    flux in carrot roots under anoxia (Kato-Noguchi,

    1998). PDC is regarded as the rate-limiting step of

    ethanolic fermentation, although the pH optimum

    for ADH is approx. 8n5 (Sachs etal., 1980). Attemptsto alter rates of ethanolic fermentation have been

    addressed by manipulating the PDC-catalysed re-

    action. Transgenic tobacco overexpressing PDC did

    not show increased ethanol and acetaldehyde in the

    roots (Tadege et al., 1998), although activity was

    altered in both leaves and roots (20- and twofold,

    respectively). The DaviesRoberts pH stat is an

    attractive and widely supported hypothesis, although

    its applicability might vary depending on the

    flooding tolerance of the species under investigation

    (Vartapetian & Jackson, 1997). It has been suggested

    that flux through lactate is in fact low, despite

    induction of the enzyme, such that the observed

    increases in lactate, although correlative, are not

    causal in the switch to ethanolic fermentation (Kato-

    Noguchi, 1998; Tadege et al., 1998). This is due to

    the relative affinities of pyruvate dehydrogenase

    (PDH) and PDC for substrate (Kml 5779 M and

    0n251n0 mM, respectively). There is a noticeable

    increase in cytosolic pyruvate when cells enter

    anaerobic conditions from 0n1 to 1 mM, allowing

    PDC, with the higher Km

    , to compete with PDH for

    substrate. Thus the lactate accumulation represents

    a competitive reaction, not a direct link (Tadege et

    al., 1998). Without the appropriate kinetic exper-imentation, it is not yet possible to be sure of the

    effect of the three competitive reactions on pyruvate

    in vivo. If correct, it means that acidosis is a

    consequence, not a cause of anaerobic metabolism.

    Hence, attempts to limit anaerobically induced cell

    death by addressing cytoplasmic acidosis might be

    futile in comparison to increasing flux through PDC,

    widely agreed to be the rate-limiting step in ethanolic

    fermentation. It is interesting, though, that in-

    creasing ethanol production did not increase anoxia

    tolerance in these plants, but rather promoted

    increased membrane leakage, ethanol and acetalde-

    hyde production, and earlier cell death (Tadege et

    al., 1998). Thus it is likely that anoxia tolerance is

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    8/19

    44 REVIEW A. H. Kingston-Smith and M. K. Theodorou

    multifactorial, involving fermentation rates, sub-

    strate availability, and toxicity of fermentation

    products.

    A role of calcium in anaerobic stress signalling has

    also been proposed, following small but significant

    changes in mitochondrial calcium content from 109

    to120 nMCa#+ after only 10 min of anoxia (Subbaiah

    et al., 1998). This work with confocal imaging ofcalcium-sensitive dyes also suggests that there is a

    heterogeneity of response of the mitochondria to

    anoxia, even within one cell, the reason for which

    remains unresolved (Subbaiah et al ., 1998). It

    appears that, as with apoptotic signalling, after onset

    of anoxia there is a rapid calcium efflux response

    from the mitochondria, not the vacuole, which could

    be the initiator of the cell death cascade\prevention

    systems (Subbaiah et al., 1998).

    Plant cells can survive anoxia for a limited time,

    and this appears to be genetically predetermined

    (Ricard et al., 1994; Drew, 1997). This might be due

    to intolerance of one or more of the products of

    ethanolic fermentation (Crawford, 1982; Kimmerer

    & MacDonald, 1987; Perata & Alpi, 1993), or the

    lack of ATP which can occur within 15 min

    (Raymond et al., 1985). Differential accumulation of

    ethanol has been proposed as a potential cause of

    observed species-specific differences in flooding

    tolerance (Crawford, 1982). Although plants respond

    to physiologically relevant ethanol concentrations

    (Perata & Alpi, 1993), these effects are now believed

    to be due to conversion of ethanol to acetaldehyde

    (Perata & Alpi, 1993, Kreuzwieser et al., 1999). Plant

    cells can generate ethanol under field conditions dueto flooding of roots (Crawford, 1982; Kreuzwieser et

    al., 1999) or when stomata are closed in the dark and

    respiration consumes available oxygen (MacDonald

    & Kimmerer, 1993). It has been suggested that

    ethanol is toxic to plant cells, but the evidence is

    equivocal. In leaves, ethanol has been observed

    at concentrations of 250 mM (Kimmerer &

    MacDonald, 1987; Kato-Noguchi, 1998; Rawyler et

    al., 1999), although in vitro exogenous application

    requires 100600 mM to induce death (Perata &

    Alpi, 1993). Metabolic attempts to remove ethanol

    involve translocation in the xylem and volatilization.Ethanol fed to leaves, or translocated from the roots,

    results in release of volatile acetaldehyde

    (Kreuzwieser et al., 1999). However, ethanol in the

    xylem increases from 0 to 12 mM during 6 h

    flooding, but only approx. 0n1% of that delivered is

    metabolized to acetaldehyde, the remainder appar-

    ently being converted to acetate, which is accumu-

    lated (MacDonald & Kimmerer, 1993; Kreuzwieser

    et al., 1999).

    It is well known that both monocot and dicot

    plants differ in their tolerance to flooding (for review

    see Crawford, 1982), and their survival mechanisms

    might give an insight into the potential ways in

    which forage can remain viable for longer in the

    rumen. The formation of aerenchyma is an obvious

    phenotypic adaptation (Vartapetian & Jackson,

    1997), but is relatively long term and so is unhelpful

    as an analogy to the rumen situation. Rice is a

    flooding-tolerant species, whereas maize is intolerant

    of short periods of waterlogging. Different rice

    cultivars can vary in their flooding tolerance, and this

    has been linked to the onset of senescence processesduring prolonged flooding (Krishnan et al., 1999).

    This has some support from observations that foliar

    protein remobilization is decreased in flooding-

    tolerant compared with intolerant lines. In the latter,

    a mere 4 d submergence of plants produces a foliar

    senescent state resembling that of natural senescence

    in attached leaves after 40 d (Krishnan et al., 1999).

    Lipoxygenase activity is largely responsible for

    anaerobic degradation of membranes, and activity

    has been shown to increase in both shoots and roots

    of anaerobically maintained rice and wheat

    (Chirkova et al., 1998). These results suggested that

    enough oxygen was generated internally for con-

    tinued lipid peroxidation over 3 d (Chirkova et al.,

    1998). The persistence of oxygen in anaerobically

    stressed plant tissue is important, as plant material

    entering the rumen could likewise be forced to

    undergo premature senescence through water-

    logging.

    It has been suggested several times that carbo-

    hydrate status influences tolerance by providing

    a ready and plentiful supply of respiratory\

    fermentable substrate. Substrates proposed include

    sucrose, glucose and fructans (Albrecht et al., 1997;

    Vartapetian & Jackson, 1997). It would also appearthat, as with much of plant metabolism, the sugar

    status represents an important signalling component

    of anaerobic metabolism (Zeng et al., 1998). Trans-

    genic root tips with increased rates of ethanolic

    fermentation die more quickly than roots from

    untransformed plants, but this can be prevented if

    the transgenic plants are supplied with exogenous

    glucose (Tadege et al., 1998). Plants in which

    hexokinase has been manipulated showed altered

    response to anaerobic stress and change in tran-

    scription of the anaerobic response proteins. Ni-

    trogen metabolism and exogenous nitrate supplymight also be important in anoxia tolerance (Van

    Lerberghe et al., 1991; Fan et al., 1997 ; Vartapetian

    & Polyakova, 1999). Intolerant plants show NADH

    accumulation within a few minutes of the stress

    (Roberts et al ., 1984). By maintaining nitrate

    reduction to ammonium, and subsequent reassimi-

    lation, an extra sink for six protons and four NADH

    per reaction cycle during anoxia become available.

    This pathway avoids generation of the toxic or acidic

    products of lactate and ethanolic fermentation lead-

    ing to cell damage and death (Fan et al., 1997;

    Vartapetian & Polyakova, 1999). Work with

    flooding-tolerant rice showed uptake of nitrate or

    ammonium ions from the bathing solution, and

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    9/19

    REVIEW Post-ingestion metabolism of forage 45

    incorporation of "&N into amino acids (specifically

    glutamine and alanine) was enhanced under an-

    aerobic conditions relative to aerobic conditions

    (Fan et al., 1997). It was suggested that continued N

    assimilation maintained the flux of electrons and

    decreased accumulation of NADH, enabling con-

    tinued fermentation. This is intriguing in the context

    of the rumen, in which ammonium concentrationsprior to feeding might be low, thereby allowing the

    possibility that forage with high rates of N as-

    similation might survive longer in the rumen than

    those with poor assimilation rates.

    3. Plant cell responses to elevated temperatures

    Plants are exposed to varying temperatures in the

    field and have well characterized responses to periods

    of cold and heat (reviewed by Howarth & Ougham,

    1993). The rumen is maintained at c. 39mC, which is

    similar to the acclimation temperatures used in heat-shock experiments on temperate species. At the

    metabolic level the immediate response to elevated

    temperature would be an increase in reaction rate. In

    the rumen, this would very probably contribute to an

    increased rate of consumption of metabolic oxygen,

    exacerbating the onset of anaerobic responses as

    already discussed. However, few data exist relating

    to the effect of a temperature shift to 39mC on the

    biology of plants. Hence the results from exposure to

    higher temperatures must be used in the first

    instance to identify potential responses of plant

    tissues to the rumen temperature. Experiments with

    cell cultures showed that treatment at 44mC induced

    symptoms of apoptosis and cell death in 50% of

    cells after 24 h treatment, compared with death of

    5% of cells maintained at ambient temperature

    (Chen et al., 1999). A heat treatment lasting only 4 h

    was sufficient to result in cytoplasmic condensation

    and DNA fragmentation (Chen et al., 1999). A

    temperature of 39mC might be sufficient to induce

    similar responses, albeit observed over a longer time

    or to a lesser extent.

    Increased temperature will also affect rates of

    protein turnover. For example, Rubisco is sus-

    ceptible to both heat-induced proteolysis anddecreased synthesis (Vierling & Key, 1985; Bose et

    al., 1999). The majority of plant protease activity in

    mature leaves is endoproteinase (cleaving within the

    peptide chain) and resides in the vacuole (Matile,

    1997). Thus, theoretically, plant enzymes have an

    advantage over those of the rumen microbes in being

    closer to their substrates, especially should the

    tonoplast (and other organelle membranes) be

    damaged in response to the elevated temperature of

    the rumen. It should be noted, however, that

    proteases released from the vacuole might require

    processing to become functional, and it is not known

    at present how, or if, this would occur in damaged

    cells. Likewise, the pH within the plant cells in the

    rumen is unclear at present, as is the timing of

    processes such as cytoplasmic acidosis and infil-

    tration of rumen fluid (buffered to approx. pH 6n8).

    This could affect protease activity in vivo and cause

    errors in the estimation of activity by in vitro

    measurements. Although genotypic variations in

    heat tolerance exist (Howarth & Ougham, 1993),

    there is a threshold in the response which couldpotentially be utilized through plant breeding, for

    example to limit heat-induced proteolysis in a

    susceptible variety. The combination of increased

    proteolytic activity and decreased energy restricting

    the capacity for protein synthesis could therefore

    result in a net decrease in cellular protein.

    Exposure to temperatures above ambient induces

    de novo synthesis of heat-shock proteins (HSP).

    Synthesis is transient, detectable minutes after

    imposition of heat stress, but occurring only during

    the first 2 h at 40mC (Kimpel et al., 1990). These

    proteins are thought to participate in cellularattempts to prevent heat-induced misfolding of

    proteins (Boston et al., 1996). Cellular localization

    and precise functions of the HSPs varies. For

    example, the HSP70 family of the cytosol and the

    cpn family in the chloroplast aid correct protein

    folding, whereas the HSP100 family functions to

    promote disaggregation of protein, hence enabling

    degradation and remobilization (reviewed by Boston

    et al., 1996). Under aerobic conditions these proteins

    can account for up to 2% of the cellular protein. In

    relation to plant cells in the rumen, these two factors

    suggest that the balance between protein degradation

    and synthesis favours degradation, especially as

    incubation in the rumen progresses. We have

    observed net loss of protein from grass incubated

    under anaerobic conditions at 39mC in the absence of

    microorganisms (Beha et al., 1998; Kingston-Smith

    & Theodorou, 2000).

    Other metabolic changes in response to heat

    involve lipid and membrane chemistry (Blum &

    Ebercon, 1980; Howarth & Ougham, 1993; Mittler

    & Lam, 1995). Heat stress promotes lipid turnover,

    increased fluidity and membrane permeability simi-

    lar to that observed during senescence (section

    III.5). In the presence of oxygen, such as thatentering the rumen within or between plant tissues,

    increased lipid peroxidation might also occur

    (Thompson et al., 1998). However, this might be a

    transient event as oxygen is consumed by plant

    respiration or by the facultative anaerobes of the

    rumen. The significance of lipid peroxidation in

    plant tissues in the rumen remains to be demon-

    strated.

    4. Wounding responses\pathogen attachment

    Studies of wounding responses following herbivory

    are usually conducted on remaining plant parts, with

    little attention being given to the ingested portions.

    Although herbivory damage usually concerns aphid

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    10/19

    46 REVIEW A. H. Kingston-Smith and M. K. Theodorou

    or caterpillar attack, the generation of wound

    responses could be the same after cattle or sheep

    damage. Plant parts damaged by herbivory can

    produce a systemic wound response, localized pro-

    teolysis and necrosis (Jakobek et al., 1999; Rhodes

    et al., 1999; Suh et al., 1999). The response to

    wounding in detached plant parts might differ from

    that observed in intact plant parts. For example,systemic responses might occur in the long leaf

    lengths ingested by cattle as part of the feed bolus

    (Davies et al., 2000), but more localized responses

    would occur, of necessity, in the smaller sections

    ingested by sheep (Fraser & Baker, 1998).

    Investigations into plantmicrobe interactions in

    the rumen are generally exemplified by attachment

    and plant degradation studies, rather than by studies

    of the plants response to sudden exposure to a large

    microbial population (estimates between 10) and

    10"# colony-forming units (cfu) ml"). In the field,

    plants are exposed to a variety of potentially

    pathogenic microorganisms and have developed

    species-specific degrees of tolerance and resistance

    (Greenberg, 1997; Morel & Dangl, 1997). The

    hypersensitive response can be generated in vitro by

    incubation of plant material with 10& cells ml" of

    bacteria, with lesions appearing after 72 h (Jakobek

    et al., 1999). The observation that hypersensitive cell

    death does not occur in cell cultures (Honee et al.,

    1998) could be interpreted to dismiss the significance

    of hypersensitive response in plant tissue in the

    rumen. However, plant material entering the rumen

    is not in the form of single cells, but is in tissue pieces

    ranging from 0n5 cm to an entire leaf lamina in sheepand cattle, respectively. It is therefore possible that

    plant cells entering the rumen react to rumen

    microorganisms, or certain species of them (the

    primary colonizers), as pathogens. It is also possible

    that extracellular compounds secreted by micro-

    organisms act as elicitors of a hypersensitive-like

    response, or simply induce expression of defence

    genes without hypersensitive cell death (Mittler &

    Lam, 1995; Greenberg, 1997). The hypersensitive

    response is an active cell death processes that also

    requires protein synthesis (Mittler & Lam, 1995 ;

    Morel & Dangl, 1997). The signalling pathwaysinvolve an active oxygen burst from NADPH oxidase

    on the cell wall. Cell contents are degraded without

    extensive remobilization towards other cells, the

    main objective being the formation of a barrier of

    dead cells between pathogen and host. Although

    hypersensitive cell death is a severe response,

    specificity is retained, and induced proteases and

    inhibitors are not necessarily the same as those

    involved in the wounding response (Suh et al.,

    1999). It is possible, but as yet untested, that plant

    cells entering the rumen perceive the microbial

    population as pathogens and undergo some form of

    cell death involving rapid degradation of proteins

    and lipids.

    One response of plant cells to pathogens involves

    synthesis of PR proteins and protease inhibitors

    (Mittler & Lam, 1995; Morel & Dangl, 1997;

    Krishnaveni et al., 1999; Pernas et al., 1999). The

    exact function of these compounds is unclear at

    present, although options include direct damage to

    the invading fungus, or production of metabolites

    leading to inhibition of fungal growth. One group ofcysteine protease inhibitors, cystatins, are particu-

    larly effective against the latter; the cystatin from

    chestnut stopped growth of phytopathic fungi at

    9 M and inhibited proteases from Botrytis cinerea at

    5 M (Pernas et al., 1999). It should also be noted

    that as part of the senescence disassembly procedure

    chitinase activity increases, presumably as a defence

    against potential pathogens that could enter weak-

    ened, senescent tissues and spread to healthy parts

    (Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997; Lers et al., 1998). It is

    therefore also a possibility that plant cells entering

    the rumen might themselves affect the ability of

    rumen fungi to colonize the ingested plant material.

    Presumably, putative PR protein expression during

    senescence also fulfils a protective role (Tamas et al.,

    1998). The source of extracellular proteases in the

    rumen is always considered to be microbial. How-

    ever, preliminary results indicate that extractable

    proteases of ryegrass and clover show a similar

    activity and isoform profile at acidic pH, assumed to

    be optimal for vacuolar proteases, and the more

    neutral pH of the rumen fluid (A. Kingston-Smith,

    unpublished). As up to half of the cells could be

    disrupted through mechanical processing prior to

    ingestion, this is a potentially large source ofnonmicrobial, extracellular protease activity.

    Investigations have revealed that plant responses

    to wounding and pathogenic attack share some

    features, such as transcription of common coding

    regions, but the genes involved respond differentially

    during wounding and hypersensitive responses

    (Jakobek et al., 1999). The regulatory molecule

    jasmonate is derived from fatty acid breakdown, so

    could reasonably be expected to occur in ingested

    portions of leaf tissue as well as the remainder.

    Changes in transcript accumulation in response to

    jasmonate can be rapid, for example the accumu-lation of the transcript of the PINII protease

    inhibitor within 3 h (Suh et al., 1999). It has been

    suggested that whereas jasmonate signals during the

    wounding response, salicylate is the signal molecule

    during infection by pathogens (Suh et al., 1999).

    The role of abscisic acid as the primary signalling

    molecule of the wound response has been considered

    (Birkenmeier & Ryan, 1998; Jakobek et al., 1999).

    Recent evidence casts doubt on this, as no general

    increase in abscisic acid was found after wounding,

    but it was concentrated at the site of wounding itself,

    suggesting that desiccation at the wound site led to

    an artefact of measurement (Birkenmeier & Ryan,

    1998). In addition, the induction of a wound-specific

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    11/19

    REVIEW Post-ingestion metabolism of forage 47

    protease inhibitor correlated better with rapid

    jasmonate production (1 h post-wounding) than with

    the peak of abscisic acid accumulation (6 h post-

    wounding). Thus although signalling mechanisms in

    wounding might be different from those of the

    hypersensitive response and of senescence, it is

    possible that common features exist in the cell death

    pathways (Butt et al., 1998; Pontier et al., 1999).The oxidative burst is a common feature of both

    the hypersensitive response and wound damage, but

    can be induced apoplastically after wounding, or

    intracellularly in response to fungal elicitors (Allan &

    Fluhr, 1997). With bacterial infection, a first oxi-

    dative burst occurs approx. 1 h after infection, but

    cell death only comes about as a result of a second,

    larger oxidative burst approx. 6 h after infection

    (Lamb & Dixon, 1997). This is considered to be

    brought about by the action of NADPH oxidase on

    the plasma membrane, the resultant hydrogen per-

    oxide acting as a diffusable signal to neighbouringcells. Interestingly, hydrogen peroxide also stimu-

    lates a rapid influx of calcium ions to the cytosol

    (Lamb & Dixon, 1997). This could explain why

    there is induction of peroxidase genes after both

    wounding and pathogen infection (Curtis et al.,

    1997; Mittler et al., 1999). However, reactive oxygen

    does not appear to be an absolute requirement for

    hypersensitive cell death (Yano et al., 1999). In

    tobacco, inhibitor studies suggested that in the

    absence of an oxidative burst, an elicitor-mediated

    hypersensitive cell death was brought about by a

    serine protease (Yano et al., 1999).

    Proteinase inhibitors and polyphenol oxidase

    genes (Constabel & Ryan, 1998) appear several hours

    after wounding and are part of the late responsive

    genes. By contrast the early response genes appear

    approx. 30 min after wounding, as for example in

    expression of the lipoxygenase gene in tomatoes

    (Heitz et al., 1997). In this case wound signalling was

    mediated by the octadecanoid (jasmonate-forming)

    pathway, but expression appeared to be light-

    dependent and targeted towards the chloroplast

    (Heitz et al., 1997). Therefore wound responses in

    the rumen might be attenuated due to aspects of

    light\dark regulation.

    5. Senescence in the rumen?

    Senescence is a genetically programmed process, the

    rate of which depends on the organ and species

    under consideration (Thomas & Stoddart, 1980 ;

    Thomas & Smart, 1993; Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997 ;

    Gan & Amasino, 1997; Thomas & Howarth, 2000).

    During senescence, N stored in mature leaves is

    remobilized for transport to younger or more

    demanding plant parts. Hence the observation of

    increased protease activity, increased content of the

    readily transportable amino acids asparagine and

    glutamine, and appearance of ammonia in senescent

    tissues (Thomas, 1978; Vaux, 1993; Buchanan-

    Wollaston, 1997; Distefano et al., 1997; Jiang et al.,

    1999). The cells around the vascular tissues are the

    last to senesce (Gan & Amasino, 1997), and this

    might be related to the requirement for prolonged

    transport ability. Within cells undergoing sen-

    escence, losses of chlorophyll and chloroplast in-

    tegrity are the earliest symptoms and breakdown ofthe nucleus is the final event (Thomas & Stoddart,

    1980; Smart, 1994 ; Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997; Gan

    & Amasino, 1997; Matile, 1997). Chloroplast break-

    down is under nuclear control (Smart, 1994;

    Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997; Gan & Amasino, 1997;

    Matile, 1997; Noode! n et al., 1997), and the chloro-

    plasts can remain intact until up to 80% of the

    chlorophyll has been removed (Wittenbach, 1978 ;

    Zavaleta-Mancera et al., 1999b). The exceptions to

    this are the stay-green mutants in which normal

    senescence is impaired by a lesion in chlorophyll

    catabolism, such that senescent leaves mobilizesoluble protein but the leaves remain green (Thomas,

    1987; Thomas et al., 1992; Thomas & Howarth,

    2000). The final stage in chloroplast degradation is

    membrane degradation. This involves phase sep-

    aration, which is a change in membrane lipid

    composition leading to leaky membranes and loss of

    ion gradients. Phase separation of the lipid bilayers

    of chloroplast membranes does not occur until the

    final stages of chloroplast disassembly (Thompson et

    al., 1997, 1998).

    Mitochondrial function is required until fairly late

    in senescence to provide energy to drive the

    senescence machinery (Thomas, 1978 ; Hillman

    et al., 1994). It is also possible that membrane

    degradation contributes to energy generation via the

    glyoxylate cycle and gluconeogenic production of

    carbohydrates from acetyl CoA liberated through

    lipid breakdown (Thomas, 1986; Graham et al.,

    1992; Thompson et al., 1998). Membrane break-

    down can occur through blebbing of peroxidized

    lipids and lipidprotein complexes into the cytosol.

    However, during senescence this does not appear to

    be the main route, and at this stage peroxidized

    lipids remain integrated within the body of the

    membrane to a much greater extent than in non-senescent tissue (Thomas, 1986; Thompson et al.,

    1997, 1998). Membrane peroxidation and the

    associated enzyme activities increase in senescent

    tissue (Thompson et al., 1998), which could indicate

    that membrane turnover in plant cells in the rumen

    might be impaired because of the anaerobic con-

    ditions. Membrane deterioration during senescence

    results in poor integration of membrane proteins

    (Thompson et al., 1997, 1998). Proteins could also

    become available for proteolysis through dissociation

    from chlorophyll (Thomas, 1997). Membrane phase

    separation could account for observed increases in

    calcium release from organelles into cytoplasm

    associated with senescence (Huang et al., 1997;

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    12/19

    48 REVIEW A. H. Kingston-Smith and M. K. Theodorou

    Thompson et al., 1998), and release of lipid degra-

    dation products has been suggested as part of the cell

    death signal transduction pathway (Thomas, 1986;

    Thompson et al., 1997).

    The ability to induce senescence by placing

    excised leaves in the dark has been an experimental

    tool for some time (Thimann et al ., 1974;

    Wittenbach, 1978; Krishnan et al., 1999). There isjustifiable concern about the relevance of obser-

    vations in detached plant parts to events occurring

    during natural senescence of attached leaves, not

    least because of the possibility of erroneously

    attributing wound-inducible gene expression as

    senescence-specific gene expression (Becker & Apel,

    1993; Kleber-Janke & Krupinska, 1997). However

    this procedure is especially relevant to investigations

    of post-ingestion metabolism, for which one of the

    working hypotheses is that plant cells entering the

    rumen undergo similar processes to those occurring

    during artificially induced senescence. In both cases

    leaves are detached and held in the dark, but as other

    conditions differ the responses are not likely to be

    identical. In detached oats, the accumulation of free

    amino acids was observed after 6 h, and 65% of the

    leaf protein had been degraded after 72 h (Thimann

    et al., 1974). Especially interesting in the current

    context is the ability to break down Rubisco in the

    dark (Wittenbach, 1978; Thomas et al., 1992); this is

    the most abundant of the soluble proteins in C$

    plants. Hence any proteolysis in the rumen en-

    vironment which is directed against the Rubisco

    contained within ingested cells is likely to be of

    consequence simply because of the amount ofavailable substrate. The function of dark-induced

    catabolism of Rubisco in vivo might be to prevent

    excessive catalytic misfiring, which could lead to the

    formation of inhibitory sugar phosphate molecules

    (Portis, 1992). This process is likely to be distinct

    from the light- and metalloproteinase-dependent

    Rubisco catabolism observed in intact chloroplasts

    (Roulin & Feller, 1998).

    There are both similarities and differences be-

    tween artificial and natural senescence. In both cases

    chlorophyll is broken down (Matile et al., 1999), and

    there is the appearance of new mRNA, induction ofproteases and de novo protein synthesis (Thomas

    et al., 1992). However, the genetic material and

    proteins involved can be specific to induced or

    natural senescence (Smart, 1994 ; Morris et al., 1996;

    Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997; Gan & Amasino, 1997).

    It is clear that senescence is a genetically determined

    process that can be modulated by exogenous ap-

    plication of plant growth factors such as ethylene and

    cytokinin, or by altered cytokinin synthesis within

    the plant through genetic manipulation (Smart et al.,

    1991 ; Smart, 1994 ; Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997 ; Gan

    & Amasino, 1997; Hung & Kao, 1997; Park et al.,

    1998 ; Ori et al., 1999; Thomas & Donnison, 2000).

    The cytokinin response itself can be modulated

    through sugar signalling (Wingler et al., 1998) such

    that increased starch breakdown can overcome

    cytokinin-mediated repression of senescence. Eth-

    ylene could be a common signal both in wounding

    response and in inducing senescence (Thomas &

    Stoddart, 1980 ; Hillman et al., 1994 ; Buchanan-

    Wollaston, 1997; Fluhr, 1998). However, its role in

    the rumen is dubious because the terminal stagein ethylene production, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-

    carboxylic acid (ACC) oxidase, is unlikely to function

    under the anaerobic conditions of the rumen.

    However, ACC itself could act as a diffusable signal,

    as it appears to during submergence (Bradford &

    Yang, 1981). It seems unlikely that increased

    cytoplasmic calcium is the primary signal promoting

    senescence. Imaging studies have shown that protein

    degradation has begun before any increase in

    cytoplasmic calcium signal, which does coincide

    with or slightly precede chlorophyll breakdown and

    lipid peroxidation (Huang et al., 1997).

    Induced senescence often proceeds faster than

    natural senescence, although there is a large variation

    in the progression of senescence between different

    plant species and even cultivars (Thomas &

    Stoddart, 1980; Thomas, 1987; Hensel et al., 1993;

    Morris et al., 1996; Thomas & Howarth, 2000).

    Induction of natural senescence by nutrient star-

    vation or water deficit has been reported, and

    coincides with molecular evidence for sugar-

    mediated regulation of senescence processes. It has

    been proposed that senescence is induced when the

    photosynthetic rate drops below a threshold (Dai et

    al., 1999), although it is possible for photosyntheticrate to fall without loss of chlorophyll (Smart, 1994 ;

    Thomas & Howarth, 2000). When the hexose

    products of photosynthesis were consumed rapidly

    as a result of increased hexokinase activity, sen-

    escence was accelerated in both old and newly

    mature leaves (Dai et al ., 1999). Some, albeit

    correlative, evidence from tobacco leaves also points

    to the possible involvement of a threshold cellular

    sugar content which regulates the activity of certain

    senescence-related promoter regions (Chung et al.,

    1997). This would explain the onset of senescence in

    responise to nutrient and water stress when photo-synthate is limiting (Gan & Amasino, 1997), and is

    one explanation for differential gene expression

    during natural and dark-induced senescence. Such a

    signalling response would therefore be important in

    plant responses in the rumen. Hence plant cells

    entering the rumen could be forced to undergo an

    early senescence as a result of anaerobic consumption

    of carbohydrate during metabolic attempts to main-

    tain ATP generation.

    Although it is recognized that nuclease activity

    increases during senescence, resulting in DNA

    cleavage and degradation (Gan & Amasino, 1997 ;

    Yen & Yang, 1998), various senescence-associated

    genes have been identified and their function has

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    13/19

    REVIEW Post-ingestion metabolism of forage 49

    recently been reviewed (Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997,

    Gan & Amasino, 1997). Notably, the expression of

    the pea homologue of dadis downregulated with the

    onset of natural or induced senescence (Orzaez &

    Granell, 1997). Increasing use of differential

    sequencing and subtractive hybridization has made

    it possible to begin to identify both high- and low-

    abundance genes involved with the senescenceprogramme (Smart et al ., 1995). Those genes

    identified as senescence-enhanced to date include

    proteases, RNAses, lipases and some enzymes of N

    metabolism, as well as the housekeeping genes which

    continue to be expressed during senescence as well as

    in nonsenescent tissues (Thomas et al., 1992; Smart,

    1994; Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997 ; Quirino et al.,

    1999). However, during dark-induced senescence,

    accumulation of the transcripts of the photosynthetic

    genes rbcL, psaA, psaB and aptB decreases (Thomas

    et al., 1992; Kleber-Janke & Krupinska, 1997;

    Krause et al., 1998). However, transcript levels ofpsbA and psbD are unaffected, even though after 8 h

    in the dark chloroplast transcriptional activity was

    estimated (from UTP incorporation) to be only 30%

    of that observed in the light (Krause et al., 1998).

    Downregulation is reversible, but there is discrep-

    ancy between separate experiments in estimating the

    point at which complete chloroplast disassembly

    comes about. Chloroplasts can become substantially

    dismantled, yet still be capable of renewed synthesis

    of chlorophyll and associated proteins (Zavaleta-

    Mancera et al., 1999a,b). Re-illumination of excised

    barley leaves stimulated a return of transcription

    even after 6 d dark treatment (Kleber-Janke and

    Krupinska, 1997), but other work suggested that 56 h

    dark treatment was sufficient for complete chloro-

    plast dismantling (Krause et al., 1998). Dismantling

    of the chloroplast is a critical process in terms of

    plant metabolism in the rumen as most of the soluble

    protein is confined within this organelle, and

    while it remains intact the question of microbial

    access remains.

    In determining the role that senescence processes

    play in cell death and proteolysis in ingested plant

    material in the rumen, the potential activation\

    production of senescence-related proteases is ofprimary importance. Likewise, the observation that

    cellulases can be induced as part of senescence

    (Pavanas et al., 1998) might also be important in the

    ability of rumen microorganisms to colonize ingested

    material, as this would aid cell-wall loosening. A

    recent estimate suggested that due to the physical

    nature of plant cell walls, only c. 20% would be

    digested during the average rumen incubation

    (Wilson & Mertens, 1995). Senescence-related

    proteases are believed to be primarily associated with

    lytic vacuoles and the endoplasmic reticulum

    (Thomas & Stoddart, 1980; Feller, 1986; Buchanan-

    Wollaston, 1997; Matile, 1997; Rogers, 1998).

    Proteases do also exist in the cytosol and chloroplast,

    although these are primarily concerned with removal

    of structurally deficient proteins, processing transit

    peptides, and degrading damaged proteins of the

    photosystems (Adam, 1996; Andersson & Aro, 1997;

    Clarke, 1999). Specific proteases are upregulated

    during senescence (Feller, 1986). There are ever-

    increasing examples of the involvement of cysteine

    proteases during senescence and other cell deathpathways (Linthorst et al., 1993; Smart, 1994;

    Valpuesta et al ., 1995; Griffiths et al ., 1997;

    Guerrero et al ., 1998; Popovic et al ., 1998;

    Sokolenko et al., 1998; Thomas & Donnison, 2000).

    It is interesting to note that cysteine proteases from

    plants are often inactivated on extraction, due to the

    presence of air (Yonezawa et al., 1997); this is not

    a problem if cysteine proteases are liberated into

    the anaerobic rumen fluid. The influence of the

    ubiquitin system of protein degradation (Hershko

    & Ciechanover, 1998) has been demonstrated for

    cytosolic proteins through the upregulation ofubiquitin-carrier proteins during senescence (Callis

    & Vierstra, 1989). There are currently two views as to

    the mechanism of degradation of chloroplast proteins

    during senescence: this could occur in the chloro-

    plast or after transport of proteins to the vacuole;

    or in situ mediated by chloroplast proteases. Pro-

    teasesin the vacuole are capable of degrading Rubisco

    in vitro (Miyadai et al., 1990; Yoshida & Minimaka,

    1996; Bose et al., 1999). However, it has been

    suggested that observations of chloroplast-associated

    protease activity (Liu & Jagendorf, 1986, Mae et al.,

    1989; Bushnell et al., 1993) represent carry-over

    contamination (Bose et al., 1999). The persistence ofthe hypothesis that proteins must be translocated to

    lytic vacuoles for breakdown is largely due to the lack

    of chloroplast-targeting leader sequences on sene-

    scence-induced proteases, the apparent absence of

    ubiquitin, and the equivocal nature of the evidence

    from the ClpP protease system in the chloroplast.

    The Clp family of proteases was first identified in

    bacteria and requires both a catalytic (ClpP) and

    ATP hydrolytic (called ClpA in bacteria and ClpC in

    plants) subunit (reviewed by Clarke, 1999). Homo-

    logues have been identified in plants in both cytosolic

    and chloroplastic compartments in mature leaves(Desimone et al., 1997; Nakabaya et al., 1999;

    Weaver et al., 1999). The thylakoid-associated ATP-

    dependent protease discovered by Liu & Jagendorf

    (1984) might also be an example of a ClpP homo-

    logue. The presence of functional ClpP and ClpC in

    the chloroplast supports the idea that degradation of

    chloroplast proteins can occur in situ (Desimone et

    al., 1997). Recent investigations into the expression

    of the transcripts of plastidic ClpP (pClpP) and

    ClpC identified in Arabidopsis thaliana show ex-

    tensive downregulation in darkness during natural

    and induced senescence (Humbeck & Krupinska,

    1996; Nakabaya et al., 1999). Initially this suggested

    that this protease complex had little role during

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    14/19

    50 REVIEW A. H. Kingston-Smith and M. K. Theodorou

    senescence, but further investigation revealed that,

    although transcript level decreased, the pre-existing

    proteins of the plastidic subunits (ClpC and pClpP)

    were stable during induced senescence, although less

    so during natural senescence (Nakabaya et al., 1999 ;

    Weaver et al., 1999). This poses the interesting

    possibility that Clp protease activity might not be of

    primary importance during natural senescence, butcould function during the initial stages of incubation

    of fresh forage in the rumen (at least until ATP

    became limiting through anaerobic stress), and could

    contribute to breakdown of chloroplastic proteins

    such as Rubisco. Stromal proteases have also been

    implicated in degradation of chlorophyll-associated

    proteins such as LHCPII (Thomas & Stoddart,

    1980 ; Noode! n et al., 1997; Thomas, 1997) in a

    process that might also interact with membrane

    degradation to form blebs containing lipid, chloro-

    phyll and proteinaceous degradation products.

    These might or might not be transported to the

    vacuole or endoplasmic reticulum for complete

    catabolism (Noode! n et al., 1997; Thompson et al.,

    1997, 1998).

    There is a high degree of similarity between

    proteases of senescence and those associated with

    mobilization of seed-storage proteins, such as

    oryzain and aleurain, which are active during

    germination (Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997, Griffiths

    et al., 1997). Also, specific transcripts for proteases

    which increase in response to pathogen infection can

    be upregulated during senescence in the absence of

    the pathogen, suggesting considerable cross-talk

    between the cell death pathways (Quirino et al.,1999). Post-translational activation of proteases

    might be under the control of growth regulators such

    as jasmonate, itself produced through lipid degra-

    dation (Thomas, 1986; Solomon et al ., 1999).

    Peptide-processing enzymes also become active

    during senescence, although these might actually be

    synthesized in the mature green leaves, stored as

    precursor peptides, and cleaved to the mature length

    polypeptide only during senescence (Smart et al.,

    1995; Solomon et al., 1999). Of particular interest in

    relation to rumen conditions is the recent identifi-

    cation of a serine protease in parsley, which increasesin activity during 5 d of induced senescence. This

    enzyme shows a temperature optimum of 37mC and

    a neutral pH optimum (Jiang et al., 1999) consistent

    with rumen conditions. Likewise, a cysteine protease

    with a neutral pH optimum also exists, and has been

    identified in kidney bean leaves (Sokolenko et al.,

    1998).

    Although senescence takes place over many days,

    analogous reactions could occur in plant tissue in the

    rumen over a shorter time scale due to the influence

    of heat and oxygen stress. Senescence is an active

    process in which specific senescence-associated or

    senescence-enhanced genes accumulate, unless

    blocked in vitro by treatment of leaves with cyclo-

    heximide or 2-methyl-2,6-dinitroanilino-N-methyl-

    propionamide (MDMP) (Thomas & Stoddart,

    1980; Smart, 1994 ; Buchanan-Wollaston, 1997; Gan

    & Amasino, 1997; Pontier et al., 1999). So it is worth

    noting that if plant tissue in the rumen does undergo

    induced senescence, it might be attenuated by the

    lack of an adequate energy supply to drive tran-

    scription and protein synthesis. Therefore, despiteinduction of various stress responses on entering the

    rumen, it is possible that the ultimate cause of cell

    death will be due to the anaerobic stress of the rumen

    and consequent metabolic shutdown.

    I V.

    The discussion in section III describes some of the

    processes that might occur in newly ingested plant

    material entering the rumen. It is clear that to

    construct a more realistic hypothesis of protein

    digestion in ruminants, the amount and activity of

    microbial protease should be considered alongside

    enzymes arriving in the plant material itself. We

    consider that plant biomass entering the rumen

    through grazing is subject initially to autoproteolysis

    (Fig. 3). Over a period of several hours, plant-

    mediated proteolysis cleaves tertiary structures,

    releasing small peptides and amino acids to the

    rumen fluid through diffusion and as a result of

    cellulolytic (microbial) degradation of the cell walls.

    The combination of available amino acid and

    carbohydrate promotes growth of the rumen mi-

    crobial population, and in subsequent hours the

    microbial proteolytic enzymes can access plantprotein substrates.

    Recurrent themes of plant metabolism include a

    role for calcium signalling and induction of proteases

    in response to a wide variety of cell death signals that

    could occur in plant cells within the rumen. It

    remains possible that there is a major route for cell

    death on which all forms of cell death (hypersensitive

    response, senescence, anaerobic stress) converge,

    albeit entering at various points. Given the mul-

    tiplicity of signals received by plant cells entering the

    rumen, it is highly unlikely that there is no metabolic

    response within ingested plant cells; the questionsare (1) what is the response and (2) what is the

    timing? If the first phase of rapid proteolysis occurs

    2 h after a ruminant has fed, and it takes 3 h for the

    primary colonizers to begin breaking down the cell

    walls, there is an obvious window in which plant-

    mediated post-ingestion metabolism could play a

    significant role. It is less clear what the exact

    response(s) to multiple stresses are, which takes

    precedence, and which is the lethal factor, if indeed

    this takes place before significant microbial degra-

    dation of both cell walls and cell interior. This forms

    a basis from which we can try to elucidate the

    relationship between plant and microbial processes

    in the rumen of animals grazing at pasture. It is

  • 7/28/2019 Post-Ingestion Metabolism of Fresh Forage

    15/19

    REVIEW Post-ingestion metabolism of forage 51

    Fig. 3. Revised model of forage protein degradation in the rumen: the involvement of plant and microbialprocesses.

    hoped that identification of key factors\processes

    will enable plant breeding programmes of the future

    to incorporate quality considerations into the evol-

    ution of new forage lines. Regulation of plantprotease activity in the rumen and protein com-

    plexing with components such as the tannins will be

    the primary targets. There is also the interesting

    observation that rumen-stable proteins (which pass

    undegraded to the abomasum) tend to be enriched in

    proline, glycine and aspartate (Wallace et al., 1999).

    Through a deeper understanding of the interactions

    between the rumen microorganisms and plant cells

    that contribute to plant cell degradation in the

    rumen, it might be possible to breed forage crops for

    decreased rates of proteolysis, targeted for ruminant

    agriculture. The converse might also be achieved:forage with rapid proteolysis characteristics of

    potential value for monogastric nutrition. Address-

    ing the problem from both microbial and plant

    perspectives might yet prove the most successful

    way to improve protein nutrition in ruminants and

    reduce the accumulation of environmentally dam-

    aging by-products.

    The authors wish to thank Prof. H. Thomas and Dr R.

    Merry for useful discussions, and the Biotechnology and

    Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), theMinistry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) and

    Milk Development Council (MDC) for funding.

    Adam Z. 1996. Protein stability and degradation in chloroplasts.Plant Molecular Biology 32 : 773783.

    Albrecht G, Biemelt S, Baumgartner S. 1997. Accumulation offructans following oxygen deficiency stress in related plantspecies with different flooding tolerances. New Phytologist 136:137144.

    Allan AC, Fluhr R. 1997. Two distinct sources of elicitedreactive oxygen species in tobacco epidermal cells. Plant Cell9 :15591572.

    Andersson B, Aro EM. 1997. Proteolytic activities and proteasesof plant chloroplasts. Physiologia Plantarum 100: 780793.

    Andreev VY, Generozova IP, Vartapetian BB. 1991. Energystatus and mitochondrial ultrastructure of excised pea root at

    anoxia and postanoxia. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 29 :171176.

    Asoa N, Ushida K, Kojima Y. 1993. Proteolytic activity ofrumen fungi belonging to the genera Neocallimastix and

    Piromyces. Letters in Applied Microbiology 16 : 247250.

    Attwood GT, Reily K. 1995. Identification of proteolytic rumenbacterial isolated from New Zealand cattle. Journal of AppliedBacteriology 79 : 2229.

    Bailey-Serres J, Freeling M. 1990. Hypoxic stress-inducedchanges in ribosomes of maize seedling roots. Plant Physiology94: 12371243.

    Baumont R. 1996. Palatability and feeding behaviour inruminants. A review. Annales De Zootechnie 45 : 385400.

    Becker W, Apel K. 1993. Differences