pp-09-11

Upload: fauzi-abdilah

Post on 03-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 PP-09-11

    1/5

    Volume 2 PROGRESS IN PHYSICS April, 2007

    Numerical Solution o Time-Dependent Gravitational Schrodinger Equation

    Vic Christianto, Diego L. Rapoport and Florentin Smarandache

    Sciprint.org a Free Scientifc Electronic Preprint Server, http://www.sciprint.orgE-mail: [email protected]

    Dept. o Sciences and Technology, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Bernal, ArgentinaE-mail: [email protected]

    Department o Mathematics, University o New Mexico, Gallup, NM 87301, USAE-mail: [email protected]

    In recent years, there are attempts to describe quantization o planetary distance

    based on time-independent gravitational Schrodinger equation, including Rubcic &

    Rubcics method and also Nottales Scale Relativity method. Nonetheless, there is

    no solution yet or time-dependent gravitational Schrodinger equation (TDGSE). In

    the present paper, a numerical solution o time-dependent gravitational Schrodinger

    equation is presented, apparently or the rst time. These numerical solutions

    lead to gravitational Bohr-radius, as expected. In the subsequent section, we also

    discuss plausible extension o this gravitational Schrodinger equation to include

    the efect o phion condensate via Gross-Pitaevskii equation, as described recently

    by Mofat. Alternatively one can consider this condensate rom the viewpoint

    o Bogoliubov-deGennes theory, which can be approximated with coupled time-

    independent gravitational Schrodinger equation. Further observation is o course

    recommended in order to reute or veriy this proposition.

    1 Introduction

    In the past ew years, there have been some hypotheses sug-

    gesting that quantization o planetary distance can be derived

    rom a gravitational Schrodinger equation, such as Rubcic

    & Rubcic and also Nottales scale relativity method [1, 3].Interestingly, the gravitational Bohr radius derived rom this

    gravitational Schrodinger equation yields prediction o new

    type o astronomical observation in recent years, i.e. extra-

    solar planets, with unprecedented precision [2].

    Furthermore, as we discuss in preceding paper [4], using

    similar assumption based on gravitational Bohr radius, one

    could predict new planetoids in the outer orbits o Pluto

    which are apparently in good agreement with recent observa-

    tional nding.. Thereore one could induce rom this observ-

    ation that the gravitational Schrodinger equation (and gravi-

    tational Bohr radius) deserves urther consideration.

    In the meantime, it is known that all present theories

    discussing gravitational Schrodinger equation only take its

    time-independent limit. Thereore it seems worth to nd out

    the solution and implication o time-dependent gravitational

    Schrodinger equation (TDGSE). This is what we will discuss

    in the present paper.

    First we will nd out numerical solution o time-inde-

    pendent gravitational Schrodinger equation which shall yield

    gravitational Bohr radius as expected [1, 2, 3]. Then we ex-

    tend our discussion to the problem o time-dependent grav-

    itational Schrodinger equation.

    In the subsequent section, we also discuss plausible ex-

    tension o this gravitational Schrodinger equation to include the

    efect o phion condensate via Gross-Pitaevskii equation,

    as described recently by Mofat [5]. Alternatively one can

    consider this phion condensate model rom the viewpoint o

    Bogoliubov-deGennes theory, which can be approximated

    with coupled time-independent gravitational Schrodinger

    equation. To our knowledge this proposition o coupled time-independent gravitational Schrodinger equation has never

    been considered beore elsewhere.

    Further observation is o course recommended in order

    to veriy or reute the propositions outlined herein.

    All numerical computation was perormed using Maple.

    Please note that in all conditions considered here, we use

    only gravitational Schrodinger equation as described in Rub-

    cic & Rubcic [3], thereore we neglect the scale relativistic

    efect or clarity.

    2 Numerical solution o time-independent gravitational

    Schrodinger equation and time-dependent gravita-tional Schrodinger equation

    First we write down the time-independent gravitational

    Schrodinger radial wave equation in accordance with Rubcic

    & Rubcic [3]:

    d2R

    dr2+

    2

    r

    dR

    dr+

    8m2E

    H2R +

    +2

    r

    42GMm2

    H2R ( + 1)

    r2R = 0 .

    (1)

    When H, V, E represents gravitational Planck constant,Newtonian potential, and the energy per unit mass o the

    56 V. Christianto, D. L. Rapoport and F. Smarandache. Numerical Solution o Time-Dependent Gravitational Schrodinger Equation

  • 7/29/2019 PP-09-11

    2/5

    April, 2007 PROGRESS IN PHYSICS Volume 2

    orbiting body, respectively, and [3]:

    H = h

    2 f

    Mmnm20

    , (2)

    V(r) = GMmr

    , (3)

    E =E

    m. (4)

    By assuming that R takes the orm:

    R = er (5)

    and substituting it into equation (1), and using simplied

    terms only o equation (1), one gets:

    = 2 er 2 er

    r+

    8GMm2 er

    r H2. (6)

    Ater actoring this equation (7) and solving it by equat-

    ing the actor with zero, yields:

    RR = 2

    4GMm2 H2

    2H2= 0 , (7)

    or

    RR = 4GMm2 H2 = 0 , (8)and solving or , one gets:

    a =42GMm2

    H2. (9)

    Gravitational Bohr radius is dened as inverse o this

    solution o , then one nds (in accordance with Rubcic &Rubcic [3]):

    r1 =H2

    42GMm2, (10)

    and by substituting back equation (2) into (10), one gets [3]:

    r1 =

    2 f

    c

    2GM . (11)

    Equation (11) can be rewritten as ollows:

    r1 =GM

    20, (11a)

    where the specic velocity or the system in question canbe dened as:

    0 =

    2 f

    c

    1= g c . (11b)

    The equations (11a)-(11b) are equivalent with Nottales

    result [1, 2], especially when we introduce the quantization

    number: rn = r1 n2 [3]. For complete Maple session o these

    all steps, see Appendix 1. Furthermore, equation (11a) may

    be generalised urther to include multiple nuclei, by rewrit-

    ing it to become: r1 =(GM)/v2 r1 =(G M)/v2, where

    M represents the sum o central masses.Solution o time-dependent gravitational Schrodinger

    equation is more or less similar with the above steps, except

    that we shall take into consideration the right hand side

    o Schrodinger equation and also assuming time dependent

    orm o r:

    R = er(t)

    . (12)Thereore the gravitational Schrodinger equation now

    reads:

    d2R

    dr2+

    2

    r

    dR

    dr+

    8m2E

    H2R +

    +2

    r

    42GMm2

    H2R ( + 1)

    r2R = H

    dR

    dt,

    (13)

    or by using Leibniz chain rule, we can rewrite equation

    (15) as:

    H dRdr (t)

    dr (t)

    dt+

    d2R

    dr2+

    2

    r

    dR

    dr+

    8m2E

    H2R +

    +2

    r

    42GMm2

    H2R ( + 1)

    r2R = 0 .

    (14)

    The remaining steps are similar with the aorementioned

    procedures or time-independent case, except that now one

    gets an additional term or RR:

    RR = H3

    d

    dtr(t)

    r(t) 2r(t)H2 +

    + 8GMm2 2H2 = 0 .(15)

    At this point one shall assign a value or ddt

    r(t) term,because otherwise the equation cannot be solved. We choosed

    dtr(t) = 1 or simplicity, then equation (15) can be rewritten

    as ollows:

    RR : =rH3

    2+

    rH22

    2+ 42GMm2H2 = 0 . (16)

    The roots o this equation (16) can be ound as ollows:

    a1 : = r2H+2H+

    r4H44H3r+4H232rGMm22

    2rH,

    a2 : = r2H+2H

    r4H44H3r+4H232rGMm22

    2rH.

    (17)

    Thereore one can conclude that there is time-dependent

    modication actor to conventional gravitational Bohr radius

    (10). For complete Maple session o these steps, see Ap-

    pendix 2.

    3 Gross-Pitaevskii efect. Bogoliubov-deGennes appro-

    ximation and coupled time-independent gravitational

    Schrodinger equation

    At this point it seems worthwhile to take into consideration a

    proposition by Mofat, regarding modication o Newtonian

    acceleration law due to phion condensate medium, to include

    Yukawa type potential [5, 6]:

    a(r) = GMr2

    + Kexp ( r)

    r2(1 + r) . (18)

    V. Christianto, D. L. Rapoport and F. Smarandache. Numerical Solution o Time-Dependent Gravitational Schrodinger Equation 57

  • 7/29/2019 PP-09-11

    3/5

    Volume 2 PROGRESS IN PHYSICS April, 2007

    Thereore equation (1) can be rewritten to become:

    d2R

    dr2+

    2

    r

    dR

    dr+

    8m2E

    H2R +

    + 2r

    42

    GMKexp( r)(1 + r)m2H2

    R

    ( + 1)r2

    R = 0 ,

    (19)

    or by assuming = 20 = 0 r or the exponential term,equation (19) can be rewritten as:

    d2R

    dr2+

    2

    r

    dR

    dr+

    8m2E

    H2R +

    +2

    r

    42

    GMKe20(1+0r)

    m2

    H2R(+1)

    r2R = 0 .

    (20)

    Then instead o equation (8), one gets:

    RR = 8GMm22H282m2Ke0(1+) = 0 . (21)Solving this equation will yield a modied gravitational

    Bohr radius which includes Yukawa efect:

    r1 =H2

    42(GMKe20)m2 (22)

    and the modication actor can be expressed as ratio between

    equation (22) and (10):

    =GM

    (GM

    Ke20)

    . (23)

    (For complete Maple session o these steps, see Appendix 3.)

    A careul reader may note that this Yukawa potential

    efect as shown in equation (20) could be used to explain

    the small discrepancy (around 8%) between the observeddistance and the computed distance based on gravitational

    Bohr radius [4, 6a]. Nonetheless, in our opinion such an

    interpretation remains an open question, thereore it may be

    worth to explore urther.

    There is, however, an alternative way to consider phion

    condensate medium i.e. by introducing coupled Schrodinger

    equation, which is known as Bogoliubov-deGennes theory

    [7]. This method can be interpreted also as generalisation o

    assumption by Rubcic-Rubcic [3] o subquantum structurecomposed o positive-negative Planck mass. Thereore,

    taking this proposition seriously, then one comes to hypo-

    thesis that there shall be coupled Newtonian potential, in-

    stead o only equation (3).

    To simpliy Bogoliubov-deGennes equation, we neglect

    the time-dependent case, thereore the wave equation can be

    written in matrix orm [7, p.4]:

    [A] [] = 0 , (24)

    where [A] is 22 matrix and [] is 21 matrix, respectively,which can be represented as ollows (using similar notation

    with equation 1):

    A =

    8GMm2er

    rH22er

    2er

    r

    2

    e

    r

    2er

    r

    8GMm2er

    rH2

    (25)

    and

    =

    f(r)

    g (r)

    . (26)

    Numerical solution o this matrix diferential equation

    can be ound in the same way with the previous methods,

    however we leave this problem as an exercise or the readers.

    It is clear here, however, that Bogoliubov-deGennes ap-

    proximation o gravitational Schrodinger equation, taking

    into consideration phion condensate medium will yield non-

    linear efect, because it requires solution o matrix diferen-

    tial equation

    (21) rather than standard ODE in conventionalSchrodinger equation (or time-dependent PDE in 3D-

    condition). This perhaps may explain complicated structures

    beyond Jovian Planets, such as Kuiper Belt, inner and outer

    Oort Cloud etc. which o course these structures cannot be

    predicted by simple gravitational Schrodinger equation. In

    turn, rom the solution o (21) one could expect that there are

    numerous undiscovered celestial objects in the Oort Cloud.

    Further observation is also recommended in order to

    veriy and explore urther this proposition.

    4 Concluding remarks

    In the present paper, a numerical solution o time-dependentgravitational Schrodinger equation is presented, apparently

    or the rst time. This numerical solution leads to gravita-

    tional Bohr-radius, as expected.

    In the subsequent section, we also discuss plausible ex-

    tension o this gravitational Schrodinger equation to include

    the efect o phion condensate via Gross-Pitaevskii equation,

    as described recently by Mofat. Alternatively one can con-

    sider this condensate rom the viewpoint o Bogoliubov-

    deGennes theory, which can be approximated with coupled

    time-independent gravitational Schrodinger equation.

    It is recommended to conduct urther observation in order

    to veriy and also to explore various implications o our pro-

    positions as described herein.

    Acknowledgment

    The writers would like to thank to Pros. C. Castro or valu-

    able discussions.

    Submitted on January 08, 2007

    Accepted on January 30, 2007

    Corrected ater revision on March 06, 2007

    For recent articles discussing analytical solution o matrix diferential

    equations, the reader is reerred to Electronic Journal o Diferential Equa-

    tions (ree access online on many mirrors as http://ejde.math.txstate.edu,

    http://ejde.math.unt.edu, http://www.emis.de/journals/EJDE etc.).

    58 V. Christianto, D. L. Rapoport and F. Smarandache. Numerical Solution o Time-Dependent Gravitational Schrodinger Equation

  • 7/29/2019 PP-09-11

    4/5

    April, 2007 PROGRESS IN PHYSICS Volume 2

    Reerences

    1. Nottale L. et al. Astron. & Astrophys., 1997, v.322, 1018.

    2. Nottale L., Schumacher G. and Levere E. T. Astron. & Astro-

    phys., 2000, v. 361, 379389; accessed online on http://daec.obspm.r/users/nottale.

    3. Rubcic A. and Rubcic J. The quantization o solar like

    gravitational systems. Fizika, B-7, 1998, v. 1, No. 113.

    4. Smarandache F. and Christianto V. Progress in Physics, 2006,

    v.2, 6367.

    5. Mofat J. arXiv: astro-ph/0602607.

    6. Smarandache F. and Christianto V. Progress in Physics, 2006,

    v.4, 3740; [6a] Christianto V. EJTP, 2006, v. 3, No. 12, 117

    144; accessed onle on http://www.ejtp.com.

    7. Lundin N. I. Microwave induced enhancement o the Joseph-

    son DC. Chalmers University o Technology & Gotterborg

    University Report, p. 47.

    8. Grin M. arXiv: cond-mat/9911419.

    9. Tuszynski J. et al. Physica A, 2003, v. 325, 455476; accessed

    onle on http://sciencedirect.com.

    10. Toussaint M. arXiv: cs.SC/0105033.

    11. Fischer U. arXiv: cond-mat/9907457; [8a] arXiv: cond-mat/

    0004339.

    12. Zurek W. (ed.) In: Proc. Euroconerence in Formation and

    Interaction o Topological Deects, Plenum Press, 1995;

    accessed online: arXiv: cond-mat/9502119.

    13. Volovik G. arXiv: cond-mat/0507454.

    Appendix 1 Time-independent gravitational Schrodinger equation

    > restart;> with (linalg);> R: = exp((alpha*r));

    R := e r

    > D1R:=dif (R,r); D2R:=dif(D1R,r);

    D1R := e r

    D2R := 2er

    > SCHEQ1:=D2R+D1R*2/r+8*pi2*m*E*R/h2 +8*pi2*G*M*m2*R/(r*h2)l*(l+1)*R/r2=0;> XX1:=actor(SCHEQ1);

    > #Using simplied terms only rom equation (A*8, o Rubcic & Rubcic, 1998)> ODESCHEQ:=D2R+D1R*2/r+8*pi2*G*M*m2*R/(r*h2) =0;

    ODESCHEQ := 2e r

    2e r

    r+

    82GMm2e r

    rH2= 0

    > XX2:=actor(SCHEQ2);

    XX2 :=e r

    2rH2 2H2+ 82GMm2

    rH2

    = 0

    > RR:= solve (XX2, r);

    RR := 2(42GMm2 H2)

    2H2

    > #Then solving or RR=0, yields:

    > SCHEQ3:= 4*pi2*G*M*m2h2*alpha=0;

    SCHEQ3 := 42GMm

    2H

    2 = 0

    > a:= solve(SCHEQ3, alpha);

    a :=42GMm2

    H2

    > #Gravitational Bohr radius is dened as inverse o alpha:> gravBohrradius:=1/a;

    rgravBohr :=H2

    42GMm2

    Appendix 2 Time-dependent gravitational Schrodinger equation

    > #Solution o gravitational Schrodinger equation (Rubcic, Fizika 1998);> restart;> #with time evolution (Hagendorns paper);> S:=r(t); R:=exp((alpha*S)); R1:=exp((alpha*r));

    S := r(t)

    R := er

    > D4R:=dif(S,t); D1R:=alpha*exp((alpha*S)); D2R:=alpha2*exp((alpha*S)); D5R:=D1R*D4R;

    D4R :=d

    dtr(t)

    D1R := er(t)

    D2R := 2er(t)

    D1R := er(t) d

    dtr(t)

    > #Using simplied terms only rom equation (A*8)> SCHEQ3:=h*D5R+D2R+D1R*2/S+8*pi2*G*M*m2*R/(S*h2);> XX2:=actor(SCHEQ3);

    XX2 := e

    r(t)H

    3

    dr(t)

    dt r(t)

    2

    r(t)H

    2

    2H

    2

    + 8

    2

    GMm

    2r(t)H2

    = 0

    > #From standard solution o gravitational Schrodinger equation, we know (Rubcic,Fizika 1998):> SCHEQ4:=4*pi2*G*M*m2h2*alpha;

    SCHEQ4 := 42GMm

    2H

    2

    > #Thereore time-dependent solution o Schrodinger equation may introduce newterm to this gravitational Bohr radius.> SCHEQ5:=(XX2*(S*h2)/(exp((alpha*S))))2*SCHEQ4;

    ODESCHEQ5 := H3dr(t)

    dtr(t)

    2r(t)H

    2

    > #Then we shall assume or simplicity by assigning value to d[r(t)]/dt:> D4R:=1;

    > Thereore SCHEQ5 can be rewritten as:> SCHEQ5:= H3*alpha*r/2 +alpha2*r*H2/24*pi2*G*M*m2H2*alpha=0;

    SCHEQ5 :=rH3

    2+rH22

    2+ 4

    2GMm

    2H

    2 = 0

    > Then we can solve again SCHEQ5 similar to solution o SCHEQ4:> a1:=solve(SCHEQ5,alpha);

    a1 : =r2H+ 2H+

    r4H4 4H3r + 4H2 32rGMm22

    2rH

    a2 : =r2H+ 2H

    r4H4 4H3r + 4H2 32rGMm22

    2rH

    > #Thereore one could expect that there is time-dependent change o gravitationalBohr radius.

    V. Christianto, D. L. Rapoport and F. Smarandache. Numerical Solution o Time-Dependent Gravitational Schrodinger Equation 59

  • 7/29/2019 PP-09-11

    5/5

    Volume 2 PROGRESS IN PHYSICS April, 2007

    Appendix 3 Time-independent gravitational Schrodinger equation

    with Yukawa potential [5]

    > #Extension o gravitational Schrodinger equation (Rubcic, Fizika 1998);> restart;> #departure rom Newton potential;

    > R:=exp((alpha*r));R := e

    r

    > D1R:= dif(R,r); D2R:= dif (D1R,r);

    D1R := e r

    D2R := 2er

    > SCHEQ2:=D2R+D1R*2/r+8*pi2*(G*MK*exp(2*mu)*(1+mu*r))*m2*R/(r*h2)=0;

    ODESCHEQ := 2er

    2er

    r+

    +82(GMKe2(1 + r))m2e r

    rH2= 0

    > XX2:=actor(SCHEQ2);> RR1:=solve(XX2,r);

    RR1 := 2(H2 + 42GMm2 42m2Ke2)

    2H2 + 82m2Ke2

    > #rom standard gravitational Schrodinger equation we know:> SCHEQ3:=4*pi2*G*M*m2h2*alpha=0;> a:=solve(SCHEQ3, alpha);> #Gravitational Bohr radius is dened as inverse o alpha:> gravBohrradius: =1/a;

    rgravBohr :=H2

    42GMm2

    > #Thereore we conclude that the new terms o RR shall yield new terms (YY) intothis gravitational Bohr radius:> PI:= (RR*(alpha2*h2)(8*pi2*G*M*m2 +2*h2*alpha));> #This new term induced by pion condensation via Gross-Pitaevskii equation may

    be observed in the orm o long-range potential efect. (see Mofat J., arXiv: astro-ph/0602607, 2006; also Smarandache F. and Christianto V. Progress in Physics, v.2,

    2006, & v. 1, 2007, www.ptep-online.com)> #We can also solve directly:> SCHEQ5:=RR*(alpha2*h2)/2;

    SCHEQ5 :=2H2(H2 + 42GMm2 42m2Ke2)

    2H2 + 82m2Ke2

    > a1:=solve(SCHEQ5, alpha);

    a1 := 0, 0,42m2(GMKe2)

    H2

    > #Then one nds modied gravitational Bohr radius in the orm:> modigravBohrradius: =1/(4*pi2*(G*MK*exp (2*mu))*m2/h2);

    rmodified.gravBohr :=H2

    42m2(GMKe2)

    > #This modication can be expressed in chi-actor:

    > chi:=modigravBohrradius/gravBohrradius;

    :=GM

    GMKe2

    60 V. Christianto, D. L. Rapoport and F. Smarandache. Numerical Solution o Time-Dependent Gravitational Schrodinger Equation