ppt
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
1Organisational ChangeChapter 8
Soft Systems Model for Change
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
2
Overview
This chapter challenges the notion of rationality as applied to organisational change in the context of soft complexity.
Lewin’s three-phase model of change is described as a simplified representation of a more detailed description of organisational development as an approach to change.
Some limitations of organisational development as a change philosophy and as a change approach are discussed.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
3
Objectives To:
recognise that some change situations (problems/opportunities), by nature of their complexity and particular characteristics, require soft rather than hard systems approaches to change;
consider the philosophy, value orientation and theoretical underpinnings of Organisation Development (OD) as a generalised example of soft systems models for change;
outline and describe the processes and practices which comprise most OD approaches to designing and implementing organisational change;
discuss the limitations of OD approaches to managing change.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
4
Why Mess Management Is Needed - 1
Various factors such as power bases, organisational culture, leadership styles, and changes in the organisation’s environment, can in many cases make organisational change a lot more technically complex and emotionally charged (therefore messy) than the Hard Systems Model of Change can adequately deal with.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
5• People act in accordance with their
own view of what is rational for them.
• They are not puppets, dummies, cogs, cattle.
Why Mess Management Is Needed - 2
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
6
Why Mess Management Is Needed - 3
The Hard Systems model of change is not likely to be effective:
where the nature of the presenting problems is defined differently by different people (stakeholders) in the situation.
and where quantitative criteria cannot readily be agreed upon.
and where systems are complex. and where a pluralist ideology of
relationships prevails.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
7
So how can managers deal with messes?
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
8
The Art and Science of MessManagement - 1
Ackoff (1993:47) suggests there are 3 ‘kinds of things’ which can be done about messes. The first two are:
• Resolve them• Select a hunch that yields a “good enough”
outcome - one that satisfices (satisfies and suffices). Patch and mend, survival-oriented.
• Solve them• Select quantitative approaches based on research
and rational-logical methods of analysis. Focuses on the trees rather than on the wood; atomistic.
Ackoff, R.L. (1993). The art and science of mess management, in Mabey, C. and Mayon-White, B. (eds) Managing Change. London, P.C.P.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
9
The Art and Science of Mess Management - 2
The third of Ackoff’s (1993: 47) ways of tackling messes is:
•Dissolve them - idealising• Change the nature of the problem context
(or system involved) so as to remove the problem.
• Development oriented – eager to improve quality of life for self and others.
• Resigning systems at various levels of the organisation to dissolve the problem
• This is what the soft systems approach tries to do.
Ackoff, R.L. (1993). The art and science of mess management, in Mabey, C. and Mayon-White, B. (eds) Managing Change. London, P.C.P.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
10
• Change is only effective when people’s feelings, needs, perceptions, ways of doing things & hopes are addressed. AND
• messy situations require managers to dissolve existing problems, by challenging underlying purposes and assumptions.
The Art and Science of Mess Management - 3
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
11
The Art and Science of Mess Management - 4
For the manager who wishes to dissolve problems, Buchanan and Boddy (1992) suggest:
• ‘backstaging’, not just ‘public performance’
• ‘political skills’ behind the scenes• ‘intervening in political and cultural
systems’• ‘managing meaning’ – ‘selling the
change’
Ackoff, R.L. (1993). The art and science of mess management, in Mabey, C. and Mayon-White, B. (eds) Managing Change. London, P.C.P.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
12
Differences Between Hard & Soft Change Approaches
HARD Clear goals and objectives Quantifiable data Control mechanisms are
clear Power is clear, known to
work Unitary view of
organisation Evolved first to meet
needs of modern engineering and industrial systems
Aims to solve problems Analyst detached from
situation
SOFT Organisations as social
entities Goals need negotiation Different perspectives Power diffuse and
frequently unknown Consensus view/conflict
view of organisation Evolved later (1960s) in
response to difficulties in using hard approaches
Aims to appreciate and improve problems
Analyst part of the situation
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
13
Organisation Development - 1
‘Organization development (OD) is a long term effort, led and supported by top management, to improve an organization’s visioning, empowerment, learning, and problem-solving processes, through an ongoing, collaborative management of the organization culture - with special emphasis on the culture of intact work teams and other team configurations - utilizing the consultant-facilitator role and the theory and technology of applied behavioural science, including action research.’
(French, W.L. and Bell, C.H, (1995). Organization Development: Behavioural Science Interventions for Organization Improvement, Fifth edition, Prentice-Hall, p.28.).
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
14
Organisation Development - 2
‘Organization development is an ongoing process of change aimed at resolving issues within an organization through the effective diagnosis and management of the organization’s culture. This development process uses behavioral and social science techniques and methodologies through a consultant facilitator and employs action-research as one of the main mechanism for instigating change in organizational groups.’
(McCalman, J & Paton, R (1992). Change Management Guide to Effective Implementation, London, P.C.P. p 131).
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
15
Basic Assumptions of OD as a Model for Change - 1
It emphasises goals and processes with emphasis on processes
It deals with change over medium and long-term
It is about people and recognises their worth
It involves the organisation as a whole as well as its parts
It emphasises the concept of a change agent/facilitator
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
16
Basic Assumptions of OD as a Model for Change - 2
It uses action research as a means of intervention
It is participative, drawing on theory and practices of the behavioural sciences
It subscribes to a humanistic philosophy of openness
It is a process of facilitation at the individual, group and organisational level
It has top-management support and involvement
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
17
Learning Organisation - 1 More recently, the concept of a learning
organisation has been blended in with OD.
Central ideas of the LO:– A process approach to change in which
everything, including existing goals and the goal setting processes, is subject to challenge.
– Double-loop learning.– Change is continuous.– Development of the organisation is treated
as being central to its well-being.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
18
Learning Organisation - 2
More central ideas of the LO:– Shared visioning
– Proactive learning
– Continuous experimentation & risk taking
– Leaders as facilitators and learning leaders
– Team learning
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
19
Source: Mintzberg, H. (1973), The Nature of Managerial Work, Harper & Row.
Why Organisation Development Is So Important - 1
The volume of change in many organisations is
massive
The economic scene places demands on managers
while they are reluctant to change from tried and
tested methods
The role of management is changing and new models
are needed
Change management takes time
Some changes challenge basic assumptions, for
example, the role of supervisory staff
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
20
Source: Mintzberg, H. (1973), The Nature of Managerial Work, Harper & Row.
Why Organisation Development Is So Important - 2
The need for control remains - the skill is remaining
in control when so much change is going on.
More comprehensive strategic pictures are needed
which integrate different changes in the
organisation and alleviate confusion.
Organisation design and re-design are as important
and necessary as product, process or system
design and are the responsibility of management
and people in organisations, not just specialists.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
21
Lewin’s Three Step Process to Changing Behaviour
UNFREEZING
Resistance to change lessened, need for change created(Equilibrium disturbed)
MOVING
From old behaviourto the new(Changes)
REFREEZING
Change made permanent
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
22
Unfreezing
‘Shaking up’ Disconfirmation of old ways of doing
things Questioning & challenging of
established wisdom
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
23
Moving
Making the actual changes to move to the new state of existence.
Includes the development of new strategies, structures, systems & responsibilities and the shedding of old ones.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
24
Refreezing
Stabilizing, institutionalising the changes.
Making sure the organisation doesn't go backwards to the old state.
Reinforcement of the changes through symbols, such as changed logos, dress, building design, structures.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
25
Refreezing???
Re-freezing may not be appropriate in an era of continuous change, so maybe this stage involves something more like stabilising.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
26
Effective Management of Change
‘An effective manager...: anticipates the need for change as opposed to reacting after the event to the emergency; diagnoses the nature of change that is required and carefully considers a number of alternatives that might improve organisational functioning, as opposed to taking the fastest way to escape the problem; and manages the change process over a period of time so that it is effective and accepted as opposed to lurching from one crisis to another.’
(Pugh, D. (1993). Understanding and managing change. In Maybey, C. and Mayon-White,
B. (Eds.) Managing Change, Second edition. London, P.C.P.).
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
27
The OD Model for Change - 1
A number of elements distinguish this approach from the hard systems model of change discussed in Chapter 7.
Change is not a ‘one-off’ event, but is rather an iterative, cyclical process which is continuous as part of everyday organisational life.
Components of the model are diagnosis, data gathering, feedback to the client group, data discussion and work by the client group, action planning and action.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
28
The OD Model for Change - 2
These components may form cycles of activity within each stage of the OD process.
The OD approach to change is firmly embedded in the assumption that all who are or who might be involved in any change should be part of the decision-making process to decide what that change might be and to bring it about.
It is not a project planned and implemented by senior managers with the assumption that other workers in the organisation will automatically go along with it.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
29
Action Research - 1 Action research is central to EACH
STAGE of the OD process. It is a collaborative effort between the
leaders and facilitators of any change and those who have to enact it.
It involves data gathering, feedback of data to the client group, data discussion, action planning, and action.
Therefore, action research is, as its name suggests, a combination of research and action.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
30
Action Research - 2 Action research involves collecting data
relevant to the situation of interest, feeding back the results to those who must take action, collaboratively discussing the data to formulate an action plan, and finally, taking the necessary action.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
31
The OD model for changePRESENT STATE
(1a)Diagnose current
situation
FUTURE STATEFUTURE STATE
(1b)(1b)
Develop a Develop a visionvision
for changefor change
FUTURE STATEFUTURE STATE
(1b)(1b)
Develop a Develop a visionvision
for changefor change
(5)(5)Assess andAssess and
reinforcereinforcechangechange
((2)2)
Gain Gain commitmentcommitmentto the visionto the vision
(3)(3)Develop anDevelop anaction planaction plan
(4)(4)ImplementImplement
changechange
JOURNEY TO THE FUTUREJOURNEY TO THE FUTURE
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
32
Stage 1 - Understanding Present & Future States
At stages 1a and 1b the issues, problems and opportunities are to be fully explored and the (generally) multiple perspectives of people in the change situation should be understood.
Diagnosing the current situation should not be rushed through without sufficient consideration of the underlying issues as well as the presenting ones.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
33
Stage 2 - Gaining Commitment to the Vision
Once the vision for change has taken shape (stage 1b), commitment to it has to be gained.
Consequently, sharing the vision with all concerned is important, which might mean a review, again, of the vision for change.
It is vital to ‘listen to the organisation - people's responses in words and deeds to the vision proposal.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
34
Stage 3: Develop an Action Plan (1)
Stage 3 is complex and requires much consultation and gaining the participation of those who must enact the change.
Possible resistance to change must be addressed.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
35
Pugh’s Principles of Change -1
Principle 1:–Organisations are organisms
– adequacy of planning
– adequacy of persuasion
– adequacy of ‘digestion’
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
36
Pugh’s Principles of Change - 2 Principle 2: Organisations are
occupational and political systems
–account taken of occupational impact
–account taken of political impact
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
37
Pugh’s Principles of Change - 3 Principle 3: All members of an
organisation operate simultaneously in all three systems - the rational, the occupational, the political
–appropriateness of starting site–appropriateness of methods used
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
38
Stage 3: Develop an Action Plan (2) The role of the change agent is important in the
whole of stage 3. Debates occur as to whether the use of an internal or external change agent is preferable.
Buchanan and Boddy (1992) have written about CHANGE AGENTS’ competencies.– Sensitive, clear, flexible goal setting.– Team building, networking, handling ambiguity.– Communicating, dealing with people and
meetings,enthusing, motivating.– Selling, negotiating.– Dealing with the politics, influencing, the broader
view.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
39
Stage 3: Develop an Action Plan (3)
CHANGE AGENTS help the organisation to:
Define the problem. Examine and diagnose the problem. Come up with alternative solutions. Direct implementation of solutions. Crystallise the learning.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
40
Stage 3: Develop an Action Plan (4)
‘Responsibility charting’ helps in the assessment of the alternative behaviours for those involved in the series of actions for change.
It involves identifying and assigning the specific people involved in each action or decision.– who is responsible (one person).
– who are the approval givers (not too many).
– who are the supporters, resource providers (vital).
– who should be be informed.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
41
ActorsActions
A B C D E F G
1 R A A I I S
2 S R A I I I
3 S R A S
4 S I A R I
5 S A R A
6 I A R S
R= responsibleA = approval giver, can vetoS = must support; provide resourcesI = to be informed
A Responsibility Chart
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
42
Stage 3: Develop an Action Plan (5)
Possible stakeholders who are starting points for change:
Top management. Groups who are ‘management-ready’, i.e.
ready for change.– Includes ‘hurting systems. Those in pain.
New teams or systems. Change agents. Staff members who will
facilitate subsequent change. Temporary change implementation project
teams.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
43
Stage 3: Develop an Action Plan (6) Pugh’s (1986) OD matrix on p. 323 is
very useful in deciding where, in an organisation, change efforts should start and be planned.
– start with desired behaviour that needs to change.
– move to organising the system, structure, info. flows, etc. that may need to change.
– move to organise the contextual setting that may also need to change.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
44
The Pugh OD MatrixProblems
Behaviour Structureetc.
Context
Org level Poor orgclimate
Wrongstructure
Wrongstrategy
Inter-group
Lack ofcooperation
Poor co-ordination
Distance
Grouplevel
Poor teamspirit
Uncleargroup task
Poorresources
Individuallevel
Dissatisfiedperson
Poorlydefined job
Poorapplicationof HRM
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
45
The Pugh OD MatrixRemedies
Behaviour Structureetc.
Context
Org level Surveyfeedback
Changestructure
Changestrategy
Inter-group
Rolenegotiation
Improveliaison
Bringgroupscloser
Grouplevel
Teambuilding
Redesignworksystem
Changetechnologyor staffing
Individuallevel
Counselling Jobenrichment
ImproveHRM
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
46
Stage 3: Develop an Action Plan (7)Decide what needs to change:
– behaviour– systems/structure,– or contexts
Action plan must be: relevant specific integrated in the right time frame adaptable
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
47
Stage 4 Implement the Change
Stages 4 (and 5) of the OD process ‘Implementing and assessing and reinforcing the change’ can make use of a range of techniques, some of them identified on the Pugh OD matrix.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
48
Implement the Change (2) - Facilitated Activities 1
Survey feedback. Employee opinion survey.
Organisational mirroring. Focal group gets feedback from other groups about how it is perceived and regarded. Reciprocal. ‘Fishbowl technique’.
Inter-group confrontation. Each group lists its complaints about the other as well as what it thinks the other group has as a complaint against itself.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
49
Implement the Change (2) - Facilitated Activities 2
Role negotiation. Focus on each other’s behaviours and negotiate an increase, decrease or status quo.
Process consultation. The consultant engages in feedback,coaching, counselling, and helps individuals and groups finds their own solutions.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
50
Implement the Change (3) - Facilitated Activities 3
Team Building - focus on the team processes, culture and responsibilities.
Life and career planning - ‘Life line’ drawing, connecting past, present & future. Write your own obituary.
Plus various other methods for designing structures and contexts.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
51
Implement the Change (4)
Go for a series of SHORT-TERM WINS, visible outcomes (short term goals) that:– show that sacrifices are worthwhile– reward change agents– help fine tune the visions and strategies– counterbalance the cynics– keep bosses happy– build momentum
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
52
Stage 5: Assessing and Reinforcing Change
‘Hard’ change is relatively easy to assess– Set hard objectives and quantifiable
performance measures
‘Soft’ change is more difficult to assess
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
53
Assessing the ‘Soft’ Elements of Change
Survey or cultural audit.
Interviews with individuals or focus groups.
Examination of turnover and absenteeism rates.
Analysis (through observation or questionnaire) of group performance.
“Picturing” the organisation - ask staff to portray the org in pictures, not words.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
54
Reinforcing and Consolidating Change
Design appraisal, career and reward systems
which help reinforce desired behaviours.
Orientate staff training and development to
the new vision and the new situation.
Hold people accountable for maintaining the
vision and continuing to implement the
change.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
55
Iteration At all these stages, as Figure 8.2 on p.
312 shows, the requirement of iteration back to previous stages and then forwards again with modified plans and actions is crucial to the way the OD process operates.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
56
An Assessment of the OD Model for Change (1)
Three of the criticisms that have been aimed at this model for change are:
1. OD does not always face up to the harsh ‘realities’ of change. (‘Rather than unfreezing, people need to be shaken up’.)
2. OD is limited when change situations are ‘constrained’. (Diagnosis and vision already set).
3.OD does not always fit with the policies and practices of bureaucracy, political systems
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
57
An Assessment of the OD Model for Change (2)
A fourth criticism of the soft systems model for change is
4. The claim that OD cannot be applied in the same way across all cultures.Supposedly it is not suited to high Power Distance, high
Uncertainty Avoidance, and high Masculinity cultures.
Copyright Barbara Senior, Organisational Change Lecturers’ Guide 2002
58
An Assessment of the OD Model for Change (3)
Given these criticisms, care has to be taken that the OD process is modified to suit different circumstances.
It must also be recognised that, in times of crisis, managers may have to act very fast and...– it may not be possible to put into practice the full
consultation and participation that is built into the OD process.