prediction of cleaning efficiency of an electrostatic precipitator

Upload: grabsp

Post on 03-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    1/41

    Created by-Gourab Patra

    Mechanical Engineering DepartmentSeptember,2012

    Bengal engineering & science university, shibpur

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    2/41

    Why use ESP? One of the major air pollution problems is due to the particulate

    emissions from many large industrial units.

    The concentration of solid air pollutants in the vicinity of the

    industrial areas constitutes a constant offence to all inhabitants andthe environment.

    These pollutants composed mainly ofAlO3, SiO2, CaO and Fe2O3.The major part of this quantity is composed of particles with

    diameters less than10 m which can be inhaled with air.

    Electrostatic precipitators are widely used to control the particulate

    emissions.

    Cleaning efficiency of an ESP may vary between 90% and 99%

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 2

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    3/41

    The optimisation of the cleaning efficiency of ESPs isimportant in a wide range of industrial applications.

    Present paper describes the development andassessment of a complete design and optimisationmethod.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 3

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    4/41

    In this paper the numerical method and the associatedmodels are analysed first; then detailed results are

    presented and discussed and the final conclusions are

    drawn thereupon.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 4

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    5/41

    Structure of The Procedure:

    1.1. Flow field modelling.

    1.2. Electric fieldmodelling.

    1.3. Particle dynamics.

    1.4. Particlereentrainment.

    1. Thenumerical

    method

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 5

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    6/41

    2.1. Original operatingconditions.

    2.2. Optimisation study-insertion of smoothing grids.

    2. Results

    anddiscussion.

    3.Conclusions.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 6

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    7/41

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    8/41MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 8

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    9/41MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 9

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    10/41

    The continuity and momentum equations are

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 10

    Where,is the density,uiandXiare the Cartesian velocity components and coordinatedirections, respectively.

    Pis the pressure .denotes the dynamic viscosity.

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    11/41

    At this point, the complete three dimensional flow field issolved iteratively, assuming that it is influenced neither by

    the particulate phase nor the electric field.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 11

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    12/41

    2.2. Electric field modelling

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 12

    The electric field of an electrostatic precipitator is defined by

    the following equations:

    where is the density of the electric current, the charge

    density, the air dielectric constant, bthe ion mobility, theelectric field and the electric potential.

    E0

    cJ

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    13/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 13

    These equations are reduced to:

    Boundary conditions for solving this set of equations:1. The electric potential on the electrode surface is constant and equal

    to the corona onset value.

    2. At the grounded collecting plates, potential value is zero.

    3. The third condition is related to the first derivative of the electric

    potential on the electrode surface and its mathematical form is givenby,2/1)/( rBAEon

    (9)

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    14/41

    whereEonis the ion current threshold value for an electrode of

    radius r and is the relative density of air (with respect to the

    normal conditions). A and B are constants with valuesA=30.1105 v/m

    B=9.06104 v/m1/2

    for an electrode-plate set-up.

    Under the above conditions, the system of the electric-field equations is solved using the grid presented in thefigure on the next slide.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 14

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    15/41

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    16/41

    1.3. Particle dynamicsIn this step a Langrangian approach is adopted, in which aparticle trajectory is calculated and monitored until collection

    or escape in the atmosphere occurs.

    The Langrangian representation of the solid phase gives an

    accurate prediction of the electrostatic precipitator-collection

    efficiency, provided that a large number of particle trajectories

    is monitored.

    For the present study, the order of magnitude of the monitoredtrajectories is 106.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 16

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    17/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 17

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    18/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 18

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    19/41

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    20/41

    The electric charge of the particles is analytically calculated by thecharging equation

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 20

    Where, qp=Instant particle charge.

    qs=Saturation charge.e =Electron charge.

    vm=Average thermal ion velocity.

    rp=Particle radius.

    c=Charge density.

    k is the Boltzmann constant, T the gas temperature and K the

    dielectric constant of the particle material.

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    21/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 21

    The saturation charge, the average thermal ion velocity and the ion

    mobility are given by the following relations:

    bs=Ion mobility in normal T0 andP0conditions.

    The integration of Eq. (14) is done with a fourth order Runge-Kutta

    method, along with the integration of the motion Eqs.(10) and (11).

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    22/41

    1.4. Particle reentrainment

    Most significant factor for reducing collecting efficiency.

    The dust collected on the plate surface is subject to the reentrainment

    mechanism.

    Occurs due to;

    rapping action on the collecting plates.

    erosion by particles and the fluid flow.

    the weight of the particle agglomerations.

    above mechanisms produce a dust detachment off the plates that

    drifts a significant amount of particle mass back into the flow.

    Usually, the size of the reentrained particles ranges from the

    submicron to the 10 m scale.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 22

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    23/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 23

    The reentrainment modelling is based on the following relation:

    Pris the mass fraction of a detached dust agglomeration that will be

    reentrained into the flow.

    L is the length of the distance, which the agglomerationhas travelled after its detachment.

    A, B are constants. For the ESP under experiment, A =0.003 and

    B =2.

    This model is reliable only when the monitored particle trajectories

    are at least of the order of 500000.

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    24/41

    2. Results & discussions

    Findings from the numerical analysis :1. Effect of particle reentrainment mostly governs the collecting

    efficiency of an ESP.

    2. This effect can be minimized by an aerodynamic optimisation of

    the velocity profile.

    3. Most of reentrainment occurs at the upper section of the collector

    plate, velocity of the particles is to be minimised here.

    4. This is done by employing a skewed velocity profile with a

    skewness factor less than 1.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 24

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    25/41

    Skewness factor:

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 25

    The skewness factor represents the ratio of the flow velocity at the topsection over the velocity at the bottom section of the filter.

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    26/41

    2.1. Original operating conditions.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 26

    The typical operating conditions of the industrial ESP are as follows:The inlet flue gases velocity = 18.43 m/s.

    Inlet temperature 191.31o

    C.Density =0.67 kg/m3.

    Table 1 presents a detailed view of the particle size distribution at the inlet,

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    27/41

    The velocity profile at the collecting section inlet is highly non-

    uniform and skewed in the adverse direction than the desired

    one.(next fig.).

    It is expected that reentrainment will be enhanced, causing a

    degradation at the filters collecting efficiency.

    The reason for the poor aerodynamic quality of the flow at the

    central section is the sudden expansion in geometrical configuration.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 27

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    28/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 28

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    29/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 29

    Velocity Profile observed from the x-y plane:

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    30/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 30

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    31/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 31

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    32/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 32

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    33/41

    3.2. Optimisation study-insertionof smoothing grids

    The optimisation is carried out by insertion of smoothing grids.

    These grids can be easily constructed and implemented into the unitat very low cost.

    The grids have a cell structure, with variable cell density, which

    corresponds to a resistance coefficient.

    The insertion of five smoothing grids at the positions x = 15:0; 17.9,18.2, 35.3 and 36:6m, gave a quasi-uniform velocity profile, which

    corresponds to substantially improved aerodynamic characteristics.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 33

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    34/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 34

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    35/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 35

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    36/41

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 36

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    37/41

    It is observed that the collecting areas are wider and smoother, with

    an important section of them extended to the lower parts of the

    collecting plates. The mass balance of this section gave an efficiency value of 98.8%,

    which corresponds to a 44% emissions reduction in comparison with

    the original operating conditions.

    This result proves that with the insertion of cost-effective smoothinggrids, the cleaning efficiency of a unit can be significantly improved.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 37

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    38/41

    3.conclusions:

    The methodology presented in the Sections 12 constitutes a

    modular approach to the modelling of electrostatic precipitators.

    The advanced tools and models implemented therein are based on

    physical considerations and contain very few empirical parameters.

    It can be used to simulate precipitation mechanisms in any kind of

    industrial process.

    The agreement with the available experimental data is considered

    satisfactory and therefore, the present methodology has been used in

    order to optimise aerodynamically the cleaning efficiency of the

    precipitator. Over all, it may be concluded that the methodology presented in this

    paper can be successfully used for the design and optimisation of

    industrial electrostatic precipitators.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 38

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    39/41

    Future work in this field will comprise the introduction of the ionic

    wind effects on the gas phase, as well as the interaction of theparticle charges with the electric field properties.

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 39

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    40/41

    acknowledgements: This presentation is fully adapted from the research work ofAgamemnon A.Varonos, John S.Anagnostopoulos, George

    C.Bergeles on PREDICTION OF CLEANING EFFICIENCY OF

    AN ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR published in Journal of

    Electrostatics vol.55 (2002) 111133 .

    I downloaded it from www.sciencedirect.com .

    MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 40

  • 8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator

    41/41