prediction of cleaning efficiency of an electrostatic precipitator
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
1/41
Created by-Gourab Patra
Mechanical Engineering DepartmentSeptember,2012
Bengal engineering & science university, shibpur
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
2/41
Why use ESP? One of the major air pollution problems is due to the particulate
emissions from many large industrial units.
The concentration of solid air pollutants in the vicinity of the
industrial areas constitutes a constant offence to all inhabitants andthe environment.
These pollutants composed mainly ofAlO3, SiO2, CaO and Fe2O3.The major part of this quantity is composed of particles with
diameters less than10 m which can be inhaled with air.
Electrostatic precipitators are widely used to control the particulate
emissions.
Cleaning efficiency of an ESP may vary between 90% and 99%
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 2
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
3/41
The optimisation of the cleaning efficiency of ESPs isimportant in a wide range of industrial applications.
Present paper describes the development andassessment of a complete design and optimisationmethod.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 3
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
4/41
In this paper the numerical method and the associatedmodels are analysed first; then detailed results are
presented and discussed and the final conclusions are
drawn thereupon.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 4
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
5/41
Structure of The Procedure:
1.1. Flow field modelling.
1.2. Electric fieldmodelling.
1.3. Particle dynamics.
1.4. Particlereentrainment.
1. Thenumerical
method
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 5
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
6/41
2.1. Original operatingconditions.
2.2. Optimisation study-insertion of smoothing grids.
2. Results
anddiscussion.
3.Conclusions.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 6
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
7/41
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
8/41MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 8
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
9/41MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 9
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
10/41
The continuity and momentum equations are
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 10
Where,is the density,uiandXiare the Cartesian velocity components and coordinatedirections, respectively.
Pis the pressure .denotes the dynamic viscosity.
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
11/41
At this point, the complete three dimensional flow field issolved iteratively, assuming that it is influenced neither by
the particulate phase nor the electric field.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 11
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
12/41
2.2. Electric field modelling
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 12
The electric field of an electrostatic precipitator is defined by
the following equations:
where is the density of the electric current, the charge
density, the air dielectric constant, bthe ion mobility, theelectric field and the electric potential.
E0
cJ
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
13/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 13
These equations are reduced to:
Boundary conditions for solving this set of equations:1. The electric potential on the electrode surface is constant and equal
to the corona onset value.
2. At the grounded collecting plates, potential value is zero.
3. The third condition is related to the first derivative of the electric
potential on the electrode surface and its mathematical form is givenby,2/1)/( rBAEon
(9)
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
14/41
whereEonis the ion current threshold value for an electrode of
radius r and is the relative density of air (with respect to the
normal conditions). A and B are constants with valuesA=30.1105 v/m
B=9.06104 v/m1/2
for an electrode-plate set-up.
Under the above conditions, the system of the electric-field equations is solved using the grid presented in thefigure on the next slide.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 14
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
15/41
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
16/41
1.3. Particle dynamicsIn this step a Langrangian approach is adopted, in which aparticle trajectory is calculated and monitored until collection
or escape in the atmosphere occurs.
The Langrangian representation of the solid phase gives an
accurate prediction of the electrostatic precipitator-collection
efficiency, provided that a large number of particle trajectories
is monitored.
For the present study, the order of magnitude of the monitoredtrajectories is 106.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 16
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
17/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 17
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
18/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 18
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
19/41
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
20/41
The electric charge of the particles is analytically calculated by thecharging equation
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 20
Where, qp=Instant particle charge.
qs=Saturation charge.e =Electron charge.
vm=Average thermal ion velocity.
rp=Particle radius.
c=Charge density.
k is the Boltzmann constant, T the gas temperature and K the
dielectric constant of the particle material.
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
21/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 21
The saturation charge, the average thermal ion velocity and the ion
mobility are given by the following relations:
bs=Ion mobility in normal T0 andP0conditions.
The integration of Eq. (14) is done with a fourth order Runge-Kutta
method, along with the integration of the motion Eqs.(10) and (11).
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
22/41
1.4. Particle reentrainment
Most significant factor for reducing collecting efficiency.
The dust collected on the plate surface is subject to the reentrainment
mechanism.
Occurs due to;
rapping action on the collecting plates.
erosion by particles and the fluid flow.
the weight of the particle agglomerations.
above mechanisms produce a dust detachment off the plates that
drifts a significant amount of particle mass back into the flow.
Usually, the size of the reentrained particles ranges from the
submicron to the 10 m scale.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 22
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
23/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 23
The reentrainment modelling is based on the following relation:
Pris the mass fraction of a detached dust agglomeration that will be
reentrained into the flow.
L is the length of the distance, which the agglomerationhas travelled after its detachment.
A, B are constants. For the ESP under experiment, A =0.003 and
B =2.
This model is reliable only when the monitored particle trajectories
are at least of the order of 500000.
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
24/41
2. Results & discussions
Findings from the numerical analysis :1. Effect of particle reentrainment mostly governs the collecting
efficiency of an ESP.
2. This effect can be minimized by an aerodynamic optimisation of
the velocity profile.
3. Most of reentrainment occurs at the upper section of the collector
plate, velocity of the particles is to be minimised here.
4. This is done by employing a skewed velocity profile with a
skewness factor less than 1.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 24
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
25/41
Skewness factor:
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 25
The skewness factor represents the ratio of the flow velocity at the topsection over the velocity at the bottom section of the filter.
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
26/41
2.1. Original operating conditions.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 26
The typical operating conditions of the industrial ESP are as follows:The inlet flue gases velocity = 18.43 m/s.
Inlet temperature 191.31o
C.Density =0.67 kg/m3.
Table 1 presents a detailed view of the particle size distribution at the inlet,
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
27/41
The velocity profile at the collecting section inlet is highly non-
uniform and skewed in the adverse direction than the desired
one.(next fig.).
It is expected that reentrainment will be enhanced, causing a
degradation at the filters collecting efficiency.
The reason for the poor aerodynamic quality of the flow at the
central section is the sudden expansion in geometrical configuration.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 27
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
28/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 28
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
29/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 29
Velocity Profile observed from the x-y plane:
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
30/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 30
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
31/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 31
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
32/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 32
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
33/41
3.2. Optimisation study-insertionof smoothing grids
The optimisation is carried out by insertion of smoothing grids.
These grids can be easily constructed and implemented into the unitat very low cost.
The grids have a cell structure, with variable cell density, which
corresponds to a resistance coefficient.
The insertion of five smoothing grids at the positions x = 15:0; 17.9,18.2, 35.3 and 36:6m, gave a quasi-uniform velocity profile, which
corresponds to substantially improved aerodynamic characteristics.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 33
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
34/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 34
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
35/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 35
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
36/41
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 36
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
37/41
It is observed that the collecting areas are wider and smoother, with
an important section of them extended to the lower parts of the
collecting plates. The mass balance of this section gave an efficiency value of 98.8%,
which corresponds to a 44% emissions reduction in comparison with
the original operating conditions.
This result proves that with the insertion of cost-effective smoothinggrids, the cleaning efficiency of a unit can be significantly improved.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 37
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
38/41
3.conclusions:
The methodology presented in the Sections 12 constitutes a
modular approach to the modelling of electrostatic precipitators.
The advanced tools and models implemented therein are based on
physical considerations and contain very few empirical parameters.
It can be used to simulate precipitation mechanisms in any kind of
industrial process.
The agreement with the available experimental data is considered
satisfactory and therefore, the present methodology has been used in
order to optimise aerodynamically the cleaning efficiency of the
precipitator. Over all, it may be concluded that the methodology presented in this
paper can be successfully used for the design and optimisation of
industrial electrostatic precipitators.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 38
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
39/41
Future work in this field will comprise the introduction of the ionic
wind effects on the gas phase, as well as the interaction of theparticle charges with the electric field properties.
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 39
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
40/41
acknowledgements: This presentation is fully adapted from the research work ofAgamemnon A.Varonos, John S.Anagnostopoulos, George
C.Bergeles on PREDICTION OF CLEANING EFFICIENCY OF
AN ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR published in Journal of
Electrostatics vol.55 (2002) 111133 .
I downloaded it from www.sciencedirect.com .
MECHANICAL ENGG. DEPT. 40
-
8/12/2019 Prediction of Cleaning Efficiency of an Electrostatic Precipitator
41/41