pregnancy episode grouper: development, validation, and applications mark c. hornbrook, phd...

42
Pregnancy Episode Grouper: Development, Validation, and Applications Mark C. Hornbrook, PhD AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting Washington, DC June 9, 2008

Upload: terence-norris

Post on 26-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Pregnancy Episode Grouper: Development, Validation, and Applications

Mark C. Hornbrook, PhDAcademyHealth Annual Research MeetingWashington, DCJune 9, 2008

2

Research Team

Reproductive Health Division, CDC Cynthia J. Berg, MD, MPH F. Carol Bruce, RN, MPHD William M. Callaghan, MD, MPH Susan Y. Chu, PhD Patricia M. Dietz, DrPH

The Center for Health Research, KPNW Mark C. Hornbrook, PhD Donald J. Bachman, MS Rachel Gold, PhD, MPH Maureen C. O’Keeffe Rosetti, MS Kimberly Vesco, MD Selvi B. Williams, MD, MPH Evelyn P. Whitlock, MD, MPH

3

Funding

Contract # CDC 200-2001-00074, Task # MC2-02, “Extent of Maternal Morbidity in a Managed Care Setting,” from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention America’s Health Insurance Plans

administered this contract

Contract # CDC 200-2006-17832, “Extent of Maternal Morbidity in a Managed Care Setting”

4

Maternal Health

Over 6 million pregnancies in the US annually Previously, hospitalizations used as proxy for morbidity Today, we use a more comprehensive assessment of the

incidence and prevalence of maternal morbidity Changes in medical practice have led to more outpatient treatment

for pregnancy complications Medical informatics now frequently include computerized clinical

and laboratory/pathology information systems

5

Objectives

Develop a pregnancy episode grouper algorithm using HMO electronic data warehouse

Identify all pregnancies occurring in HMO members during the study period

Identify each pregnancy’s outcome Identify maternal morbidities occurring within pregnancy episodes Estimate the prevalence of maternal morbidity in the study population

Develop research and quality improvement applications

6

Research Setting

Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), a non­profit, prepaid group practice HMO in the Pacific Northwest, with 475,000 members

Includes commercial, individual, Washington State Basic Health Plan, Medicare, and Medicaid enrollees

Demographically representative of the local communityAutomated ambulatory medical record system linked to

administrative, encounter, financial, and clinical management information systems

7

Over 2/3 of pregnancies ended in live birthand almost 1/3 in spontaneous or induced abortion

Live­births­create­inpatient­delivery­records,­birth­certificates,­and­health­plan­enrollment­records

8

Episodes

Fundamental unit of measure for health care phenomena Conceptual taxonomy

Health problem/illness episodes Patient’s perspective on lived experience of health problem and related treatment

Disease episodes Model of the natural course of a disease or health problem

Care Episodes Clusters of utilization linked to a specific therapeutic problem/goal

Pregnancy Quintessential episode—well-defined beginning and ending points and

natural course

9

Episode Definition

Pregnancy = Interval between estimated date of LMP and eight weeks after delivery/pregnancy termination

Other potential specifications Entire pregnancy episode may/may not have occurred within the

observation period Women had to be enrolled on outcome date or enrolled at any time

11

Methods

Diagnostic, treatment, laboratory, pharmacy, imaging, home health, and other databases searched for codes that could indicate pregnancy

Complex hierarchical decision rules to determine if a pregnancy occurred and, if so, the outcome and the date it began and ended

13

Electronic Data Sources

Hospital discharge abstracts

Same-day surgery records

Ambulatory encounter abstracts or electronic medical records

Emergency department visits

Pharmacy dispensings

Outside professional & facility claims and referrals

Imaging procedures

Laboratory test results

Home health visits

Birth certificates

14

Pregnancy End Date and Outcome

Retrospective, omniscient logic Start at the end of the pregnancy because the data are most

reliable, then work on the episodes with less data Diagnostic and procedure codes and selected claims data,

and their associated dates, indicate the outcome of pregnancy and when it ended

20

Pregnancy Episodes Identified

22

Ectopic Pregnancies

Medical termination Rx = Methotrexate Repeat pregnancy tests until hormone levels drop to pre­pregnancy

levels Surgical termination

Surgical procedure for removal of embryo Repeat pregnancy tests until hormone levels drop to pre­pregnancy

levels

23

Spontaneous Losses

Positive pregnancy test or diagnosis Prenatal care encounters stop No delivery/termination procedure Many undetected if woman is not trying to get pregnant

24

Elective Losses

Positive pregnancy test or diagnosis Therapeutic abortion procedure

Surgical Medical

No evidence of delivery within expected episode window

25

Births

Live births Delivery codes Infant hospital discharge Birth certificates Addition of infant to family health plan contract

Stillbirths Look at delivery codes, especially delivery complications No birth certificate or infant utilization data available

26

Overlapping Episodes

Overlapping pregnancy episodes are medically impossible Grouper algorithm has hierarchical logic to resolve

implausible episode patterns Select the most likely scenario and ignore the competing data

27

Algorithm Validation: Methods

Gold Standard = blinded medical records abstractors (MRAs) using actual electronic and hard-copy medical and billing records

Stratified sampling to obtain representation of all types of pregnancy outcomes

32

Pregnancies Missed by Algorithm (N= 24)

n = 511 women, 702 pregnancies

33

Pregnancies Missed by MRAs (No. out of total of 38)

38

Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:1089 95

39

Definition:Maternal Morbidity

Any condition during a pregnancy episode that adversely affected women’s physical or psychological health

Condition are unique to, or exacerbated by, pregnancy Used ICD-9-CM codes to classify morbidity into forty-six

major categories Clinically experienced authors reviewed all ICD-9-CM codes

and developed a list of 46 major maternal morbidity disease classes

41

Results

Type of morbidity varied by pregnancy outcome UTI common with all outcomes Mental health conditions common with all outcomes,

especially stillbirth Anemia common with live/stillbirth Infections common with stillbirth

42

Most Common Maternal Morbidities byPregnancy Outcome

43

Maternal Morbidities AmongLive Birth Pregnancies by Pay Source

0

5

10

15

20

Anemia UTI Pelvic/PerinealComplications

Mental HealthConditions

PostpartumHemorrhage

Perc

enta

ge

0

5

10

15

20

Anemia UTI Pelvic/PerinealComplications

Mental HealthConditions

PostpartumHemorrhage

Medicaid­(n=4186) BHP­(n=528) Commercial­(n=12104)

44

Am J Psych 2007;164:1515-1520

Article

45

Percent of Women with Diagnosed Depression Before, During, and After Pregnancy

% ofWomen

46

Percent of Women Diagnosed with Depression who Received Treatment Before, During, or After Pregnancy

% ofWomen

47

Maternal Depression

Depression before, during, or after pregnancy was common (15.4%) among women enrolled in KPNW

Depression diagnosis did not vary substantially before (8.7%), during (6.9%), or after (10.4%) pregnancy, but the clinical specialty of where women were diagnosed did

About 50% of women with depression before pregnancy relapsed during the postpartum period

About 50% of women diagnosed with depression did not have any prior history during the study period

Over 90% of women with diagnosed depression received treatment Anti-depressant use was common

during pregnancy Depressed women were more likely

than non-depressed women to receive Medicaid, to be unmarried, to have 3 or more children, to be white, and to have smoked during pregnancy

48

New Engl J Med 2008;358:1444-53

49

Pregnancy and Obesity

Increasing maternal BMI is associated with greater utilization of health care, especially for pregnancies associated with more extreme obesity (BMI >35.0)

Almost all of this increase in utilization was related to the increased rates of cesarean delivery, gestational diabetes, diabetes mellitus, and hypertensive disorders among obese pregnant women

50

Pre-Pregnancy BMI and Hospital Days in Pregnancy

3.5 3.6 3.74 4.1

4.4

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

<18.5 18.5-24.9 25.0-29.9 30.0-34.9 35.0-39.9 40.0+

Days

51

Pre-Pregnancy BMI and Ultrasounds in Pregnancy

3.5 3.7 3.94.4

5.4

7.5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

<18.5 18.5-24.9 25.0-29.9 30.0-34.9 35.0-39.9 40.0+

Ultrasounds

52

Pre-Pregnancy BMI and MD Visits in Pregnancy

4.3 4.4 4.6 4.85.4

6

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

<18.5 18.5-24.9 25.0-29.9 30.0-34.9 35.0-39.9 40.0+

Visits

53

Pre-Pregnancy BMI and Dispensings in Pregnancy

3.6 3.64.1

4.9

6.3

7.7

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

<18.5 18.5-24.9 25.0-29.9 30.0-34.9 35.0-39.9 40.0+

Dispensings

54

Diabetes Screening

All pregnant women who receive prenatal care are screened for diabetes mellitus (DM)

DM first diagnosed in pregnancy is coded as Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)

All women with GDM should receive post-partum blood glucose screening

GDM increases risk of obesity in offspring

55

Percent of Pregnancies with Confirmed Gestational Diabetes (GDM):1999-2006 Kaiser Permanente Northwest

56

Percent of Clinician Orders and Percent of Completed Postpartum Glucose Tests

among Confirmed Gestational Diabetes-affected Pregnancies

9 10.3 10.817

46.9

57.8 56.450.3

15.9 16.7

28.5

41.5

7079.3 79.2

74

0102030405060708090

100

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

% Completed tests

% Clinician orders

57

GDM Intervention

Adherence to GDM screening guideline varies widely by medical office within HMO

Intervention Provider reminders to order FBS test Patient reminders to obtain FBS test Track noncompliant women and escalate reminders to patients and

physicians

58

Limitations of Pregnancy Grouper

Missing or erroneous input data Coding errors Problems in rolling up billing records Pregnancies with little or no prenatal

care Use of multiple healthcare systems

Inconsistent pregnancy indicators Multiple providers: differing

documentation styles Complex pregnancies with high

utilization Close early losses

Ectopic pregnancies and trophoblastic disease are inherently difficult to define

59

Conclusions

Algorithm error rates are nearly identical to those for the MRAs (the gold standard)

Algorithm can be applied to very large datasets at low marginal cost and much below the costs of manual chart abstraction

Pregnancy-specific algorithm supports much more refined and, therefore, clinically meaningful episode classification