prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

48
Prenatal diagnosis Case Discussion 92 th Seminar in Clinical Genetics, Tehran, Iran 17 December 2015 SR Ghaffari, MSc MD PhD MR Rafati, MD PhD 12/17/201 5 1

Upload: maryam-rafati

Post on 14-Apr-2017

162 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

1

Prenatal diagnosisCase Discussion

92th Seminar in Clinical Genetics, Tehran, Iran

17 December 2015

SR Ghaffari, MSc MD PhDMR Rafati, MD PhD

12/17/2015

Page 2: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

2

The First Family

12/17/2015

Page 3: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

3

Mutation versus Polymorphism?!

12/17/2015

Page 4: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

4

Family pedigree

12/17/2015

Page 5: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

5

Previous Investigations

Variants detected in the affected individual (Wilson disease):ATP7B Gene c.1919C>T Homozygous Exonic (known mutation) c.3903+6C>T Homozygous Intronic

Variants investigated in his spouse (not affected):ATP7B Gene c.1919C>T Not Detected c.3903+6C>T Heterozygous

12/17/2015

Page 6: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

6

A known non-pathogenic variantc.3903+6C>T

12/17/2015

Page 7: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

7

New investigations

The pathogenic mutation is confirmed in the patient

12/17/2015

Page 8: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

8

New investigations

The pathogenic mutation is not detected in the patient’s spouse

12/17/2015

Page 9: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

9

Conclusion

The pregnancies of this family are not at increased risk of Wilson disease

Prenatal diagnosis of Wilson disease is not recommended

12/17/2015

Page 10: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

10

The Second Family

12/17/2015

Page 11: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

11

Cryptic Chromosome Abnormality

12/17/2015

Page 12: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

12

Family pedigree

12/17/2015

Page 13: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

13

Results

Based on pedigree analysis

Hereditary chromosome abnormality is highly suspected

Investigations of the affected daughter (6Y):

Karyotype: 46XXMLPA using Subtelomeric probemixes

Partial trisomy of 4qPartial monosomy of 5p

Chr pos Length (nt) Ratio

01p 130 Normal (0.94)01q 306 Normal (1.03)02p 137 Normal (0.92)02q 314 Normal (0.92)03p 144 Normal (0.95)3q 322 Normal (1.05)04p 151 Normal (1.03)4q 330 Gain (1.51)05p 158 LOH (0.5)05q 338 Normal (0.95)06p 165 Normal (0.96)06q 346 Normal (1.02)07p 172 Normal (1.1)07q 354 Normal (1)08p 179 Normal (0.95)08q 362 Normal (0.99)09p 186 Normal (1.04)09q 370 Normal (1)10p 194 Normal (0.96)10q 378 Normal (1.08)11p 202 Normal (0.87)11q 386 Normal (1.09)12p 208 Normal (0.91)12q 394 Normal (0.93)13p 218 Normal (0.97)13q 402 Normal (1.14)14p 226 Normal (0.93)14q 410 Normal (1.21)15p 234 Normal (0.94)15q 418 Normal (1)16p 242 Normal (0.91)16q 426 Normal (1.04)17p 250 Normal (1.04)17q 434 Normal (0.97)18p 258 Normal (0.96)18q 442 Normal (1.07)19p 266 Normal (0.93)19q 450 Normal (1.03)20p 274 Normal (0.94)20q 458 Normal (1.22)21p 282 Normal (1.06)21q 466 Normal (1.13)22p 290 Normal (1.03)22q 474 Normal (1.12)X/Yp 298 Normal (1.07)X/Yq 482 Normal (1.15)

12/17/2015

Page 14: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

14

Metaphase FISH

Metaphase FISH confirmed Partial trisomy of 4q and Partial monosomy of 5p in the patient

Investigation of the parents: Father: normal Mother: subtelomeric translocation between 4qter and

5pter

12/17/2015

Page 15: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

15

Chr pos Length (nt) Ratio Ratio

01p 130 Normal (0.94) Normal (0.9)01q 306 Normal (1.03) Normal (1.06)02p 137 Normal (0.92) Normal (0.92)02q 314 Normal (0.92) Normal (0.99)03p 144 Normal (0.95) Normal (0.92)3q 322 Normal (1.05) Normal (1.07)04p 151 Normal (1.03) Normal (0.95)4q 330 Gain (1.51) Normal (1)05p 158 LOH (0.5) Normal (0.9)05q 338 Normal (0.95) Normal (1.02)06p 165 Normal (0.96) Normal (0.87)06q 346 Normal (1.02) Normal (1.02)07p 172 Normal (1.1) Normal (0.89)07q 354 Normal (1) Normal (1.14)08p 179 Normal (0.95) Normal (0.93)08q 362 Normal (0.99) Normal (0.94)09p 186 Normal (1.04) Normal (0.95)09q 370 Normal (1) Normal (1.08)10p 194 Normal (0.96) Normal (0.97)10q 378 Normal (1.08) Normal (1.02)11p 202 Normal (0.87) Normal (0.89)11q 386 Normal (1.09) Normal (1.08)12p 208 Normal (0.91) Normal (0.95)12q 394 Normal (0.93) Normal (1)13p 218 Normal (0.97) Normal (1.01)13q 402 Normal (1.14) Normal (1.05)14p 226 Normal (0.93) Normal (0.95)14q 410 Normal (1.21) Normal (1.05)15p 234 Normal (0.94) Normal (1)15q 418 Normal (1) Normal (1.04)16p 242 Normal (0.91) Normal (0.92)16q 426 Normal (1.04) Normal (1.03)17p 250 Normal (1.04) Normal (0.96)17q 434 Normal (0.97) Normal (1.04)

Prenatal diagnosis using MLPA Technique

Prenatal diagnosis:Fetus was unaffected

Control Positive

Fetal Sample

12/17/2015

Page 16: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

16

The Third Family

12/17/2015

Page 17: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

17

Prenatal Diagnosis of Tyrosinemia Type 1 Using Next Generation Sequencing Technique

12/17/2015

Page 18: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

18

Family pedigree

12/17/2015

Page 19: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

19

Family History

II-I: presented at emergency department with agitation and restlessness at 1 month of age and died a few days later without definite diagnosis.

II-2 was a 21-year old boy with normal growth and development.

II-3:

Failure to thrive Hepatosplenomegaly Rickets Increased level of tyrosine (375 μmol/L; reference range <145

μmol/L) The patient died at the age of 9 months before any molecular

genetic investigation carried out12/17/2015

Page 20: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

20

PND

The family requested prenatal diagnosis of tyrosinemia while the mother was at 12 weeks of gestation

Following a comprehensive genetic counseling session in which the benefits and limitations of this approach were thoroughly discussed, the parents opted to do fetal sampling for genetic testing.

12/17/2015

Page 21: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

21

Method

Chorionic villous sampling Maternal contamination was then ruled out Mutation analyses of three genes associated with

tyrosinemia including FAH, TAT and HPD using Next Generation Sequencing

12/17/2015

Page 22: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

22

Results

A heterozygous mutation (c.709C>T) in FAH gene was detected in the fetus.

This was a nonsense mutation leading to a premature stop codon and a truncated protein (p.Arg237Ter) which had previously been reported in in two Turkish patients with Tyrosinemia type I

Further investigations showed the same heterozygous mutation in both phenotypically normal parents

12/17/2015

Page 23: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

23

Sequence Analysis

A: Father

B: Mother

C: Fetus

12/17/2015

Page 24: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

24

Conclusion

successful application of next generation sequencing in prenatal diagnosis of even well characterized genetic disorders, when The time is a limitation factor More than one (specially large) responsible genes

are involved A “founder” or a “previously detected” mutation

is not present

Hence, the conventional molecular genetic investigations can not be employed

12/17/2015

Page 25: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

25

The Forth Family

12/17/2015

Page 26: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

26

NGS experience in Iran

12/17/2015

Page 27: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

27

Family history

The family were concerned about the recurrence of the hearing impairment in their children

Based on pedigree analysis, the autosomal recessive inheritance was proposed and therefore the recurrence risk of hearing impairment in the fetus was 1 in 32 (30-40 times more than normal population)

Genetic investigation of the affected individual using NGS was recommended.

12/17/2015

Page 28: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

28

Family pedigree

12/17/2015

Page 29: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

29

NGS Analysis

12/17/2015

Page 30: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

30

NGS Results

A homozygous mutation (c.2644_2644delG) in COL9A1 gene was detected in the patient.

This was a nonsense mutation leading to a premature stop codon and a truncated protein (p.Val882fs).

Carrier screening of the detected mutation in at risk family members including the couple was then recommended.

12/17/2015

Page 31: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

31

The Fifth Family

12/17/2015

Page 32: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

32

Advantages of Genetic Investigations using NGS

12/17/2015

Page 33: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

33

Family pedigree

12/17/2015

Page 34: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

34

Family history

High recurrence risk based on pedigree analysis Using gamete donation had been offered in

previous genetic counseling sessions

2 times ART with egg donation: no pregnancy

Genetic investigation and mutation analysis in the patient using NGS was recommended.

12/17/2015

Page 35: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

35

Family Members ABCA4c.6005+1delG Phenotype

(Patient) Homozygous Retinitis Pigmentosa

(Spouse) Not Detected Normal

NGS Results

Detected mutation in the patient: c.6005+1delG in ABCA4 Gene

12/17/2015

Page 36: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

36

Sanger Verification

The pathogenic mutation is confirmed in the patient

12/17/2015

Page 37: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

37

Carrier testing

The pathogenic mutation is not detected in the patient’s spouse

12/17/2015

Page 38: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

38

Conclusion

The pregnancies of this family are not at increased risk of Retinitis pigmentosa

Prenatal diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa is not recommended

12/17/2015

Page 39: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

39

The sixth Family

12/17/2015

Page 40: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

40

Prenatal Diagnosis of Wolfram SyndromePGD of Wolfram Syndrome

High Recurrence Risk of Wilson Disease

12/17/2015

Page 41: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

41

Family pedigree

12/17/2015

Page 42: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

42

Mutation detection

The pathogenic mutation is confirmed in the patient with Wolfram syndrome

Detected mutation:WFS1: c.1362_1377del16

12/17/2015

Page 43: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

43

Prenatal diagnosis of Wolfram Syndrome

The fetus was unaffected

After 2 years, the family requested preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of Wolfram syndrome

Genetic investigation of Wilson disease in the affected individual of the family was also recommended

12/17/2015

Page 44: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

44

Mutation detection

The pathogenic mutation is detected in the patient with Wilson disease

12/17/2015

Page 45: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

45

Carrier detection

12/17/2015

Page 46: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

46

Family pedigree, new

12/17/2015

Page 47: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

47

Carrier detection

The couples are both carrier of the detected mutation in ATP7B gene (carrier of Wilson disease)

Genetic investigation of Wilson disease is indicated in their children for early diagnosis and treatment if necessary.

12/17/2015

Page 48: Prenatal diagnosis, case discussion

48

Thank You

12/17/2015