Presenter: David CurdDatabase Analyst ITKentucky Department of EducationDivision of Assessment Design and Implementation

1

2

Did students make progress?― If the student’s Composite score was 1 point

higher than prior year. (Requires two years of data)

― If the student made Attainment then they made Progress. ( 5.0 Composite and 4.0 or higher in Literacy Grades 1-12, on a Tier B or C)

Did the district, consortium or state make progress?― If the percentage of student making progress

was greater than the goal.― Percentage of Progress is the number of

students making progress divided by total count.3

Years GoalStarting Point 50%

Year 2 (SY 2009-10) 51%

Year 3 (SY 2010-11) 53%

Year 4 (SY 2011-12) 54%

Year 5 (SY 2012-13) 56%

Year 6 (SY 2013-14) 57%

Year 7 (SY 2014-15) 59%

Year 8 (SY 2015-16) 60%

Year 9 (SY 2016-17) 62%

Ending Point 63% 4

5

Did students make attainment?― If the student had a Composite score of at least 5

and a Literacy score of at least 4 ( only Grades 1-12 on a Tier B or C).

Did the district, consortium, or state make progress?― If the percentage of student making attainment

was greater than the goal.― Percentage of Attainment is the number of

students making attainment divided by total count.

6

Years GoalStarting Point 3.2%

Year 2 (SY 2009-10) 3.8%

Year 3 (SY 2010-11) 4.4%

Year 4 (SY 2011-12) 5.0%

Year 5 (SY 2012-13) 5.6%

Year 6 (SY 2013-14) 6.3%

Year 7 (SY 2014-15) 6.9%

Year 8 (SY 2015-16) 7.5%

Year 9 (SY 2016-17) 8.1%

Ending Point 8.7%7

8

A replay of the School Report Card reporting READING AMO, LEP sub population. MATHEMATICS AMO, LEP sub population. PARTICIPATION RATE, LEP sub population. ATTENDANCE RATE, entire district.

9

10

11

David CurdDatabase Analyst ITDavid.Curd@Education.ky.gov(502) 564-9853 x-4744

Department of EducationOffice of Assessment and AccountabilityDivision of Assessment Design and

Implementation12