preventing and detecting collusion & fraud in public procurement oklahoma association of public...

35
Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division

Upload: percival-hicks

Post on 28-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement

Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015

Leah McCoyU.S. Department of Justice

Antitrust Division

The views expressed are not purported to reflect those of the U.S. Department of Justice

Page 2: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

The Road Ahead

• Antitrust Division Organizational Interview• Criminal Antitrust 101 • Identifying Bid Rigging & Market Allocation in

Government Contracting • Your Role in Prevention and Detection• Q&A

2

Page 3: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Antitrust Division: Role and Responsibilities

• Exclusive, nationwide jurisdiction over all violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1

• Works with investigative agencies through its criminal enforcement program

• Over 100 lawyers, plus support staff, working solely on criminal matters

• Global leader in cartel enforcement: – led increases in criminal penalties– leniency program a model for competition

authorities worldwide 3

Page 4: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Antitrust Division Within the U.S. Department of Justice

Only component of USDOJ that can prosecute bid-rigging. 4

Page 5: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Criminal Office Territories

5

Page 6: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Criminal Antitrust 101

6

Page 7: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Why Do Antitrust Laws Matter?

• The cost of collusion:– Competitors want to limit competition to make

more money – The result is that victims are overcharged and

defrauded• Anti-competitive behavior by firms

participating in the government procurement process causes a direct loss to agencies that is often passed on to taxpayers

7

Page 8: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

The Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. §1)

• “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.”

• Prohibits agreements among competitors in restraint of trade or commerce

8

Page 9: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

9

What We Prosecute Criminally

Agreements Among Horizontal Competitors to:

• Fix Prices

• Rig Bids

• Allocate Markets (Customers/Territories)

• Allocate Sales Volumes/Restrict Output

Page 10: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

10

What We Prosecute Criminally

Antitrust Division also prosecutes other crimes where competition is subverted, taxpayer funds lost, or the integrity of our investigations compromised

Some examples:

• Mail/wire fraud

• Bribery of public officials

• Tax offenses

• Obstruction/False statements

Page 11: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Sherman Act Elements

• Unreasonable restraint of trade/conspiracy– Price Fixing– Customer/Market Allocation– Bid Rigging

• Knowingly joined – intended to agree

• Affects interstate or foreign commerce

• Statute of Limitations: 5 years from the last act in furtherance of the conspiracy

11

Page 12: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

What products or services are frequently subject to collusion?

Bread Milk Construction Road Building Concrete/Cement Trash Hauling/Waste/Scrap Metal Government Contracts

12

Page 13: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Examples of Prosecutions Related to Government Contracting

• Superfund site contracting– Nine individuals and three companies pleaded guilty/convicted– Charges included big-rigging, kickbacks, and fraud– Over $6 M in fines and restitution; prison sentences 5-168 months

• Disaster relief – Typhoon Paka bid rigging– Numerous pleas and convictions– Bid rigging, wire fraud, bribery

• Federal E-rate cases– Federal funds for school internet access– Bribes, kickbacks, and bid-rigging– Dozens of guilty pleas, $10s of millions in restitution

13

Page 14: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Sherman Act Penalties?

It's risky, of course---if we're caught, it could mean many hours of community service.

14

Page 15: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Penalties Are Significant

• Corporation– Up to $100 million

• Individual– $1,000,000; and/or– 10 years incarceration

• Corporation or Individual– Twice gain to defendant; or– Twice loss to victim

15

Page 16: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Identifying Bid Rigging & Market Allocation

16

Page 17: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Bid Rigging

• Agreement in advance to manipulate outcome of bidding process

• Two or more competitors: • Predetermine the winning bidder• Agree to bid or not bid on a contract • Submit a “complimentary bid” (an intentionally high or low

bid designed to lose) • Arrange a payback for the losing bidders – quid pro quo

– Examples: money, a subcontract, another contract

17

Page 18: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

18

Identifying possible bid rigging

Look for:

Bid patterns over timeNon-competitive pricingVendor commentsSham bidders Clues in bid documents

Page 19: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

What Does Bid Rigging Look Like?

Competitor Interactions Fewer than normal number submitting bids Qualified bidders do not bid Competitors meet or socialize before bids

Patterns in Amounts of Bids Identical bids or identical increments between bids Unusually high bids or bids with no relation to cost

Physical Similarities/Alterations Same handwriting or font Same typos or mathematical errors White out

19

Page 20: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

20

What Does Bid Rigging Look Like?

Milk Bid 1

Firm A $100

Firm B $120

Firm C $130

Firm D $140

Milk Bid 2

Firm B $100

Firm A $120

Firm C $130

Firm D $140

Milk Bid 3

Firm C $100

Firm A $120

Firm B $130

Firm D $140

Milk Bid 4

Firm D $100

Firm A $120

Firm B $130

Firm C $140

Page 21: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department
Page 22: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

What Does Bid Rigging Sound Like?

“I know I am not the low bid.”

“It’s not our turn. We will take the next one.”

“I wasn’t trying to win this job. I just threw in a number as a favor.”

“We are all working together on this one.”

“I can get you a couple more bids.”22

Page 23: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Allocation

Agreements among competitors to:– Allocate customers

– Allocate territories

– Allocate sales volumes

– Allocate production volumes

– Allocate market shares

23

Page 24: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Spotting Market Allocation

• Look out for: Same company repeatedly the low bidder for certain

products or areas

Competitors suddenly stop selling in a territory or to a customer

Company refers customers to other competitors

24

Page 25: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

What Does Market Allocation Sound Like?

• “We can’t sell to you”

• “You aren’t in our area”

• “We don’t sell in that area – you will need to call Company X”

• “Company Y should not be calling you for that product”

25

Page 26: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Your Role in Prevention and Detection

26

Page 27: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Working to Crack Cartels

CCreate competition culture

CMaintain open dialogue

CLook for indications of collusion

CReport cartel conduct!

Page 28: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

28

What you can do to encourage competition and discourage collusion

Pre-Bid Process

Seek or encourage new biddersWrite specifications to expand pool of

qualified bidders Do not ask bidders to obtain additional bids

Page 29: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

29

What you can do to encourage competition and discourage collusion

During the Bid Require disclosure upfront of all intended

subcontractors, joint ventures, suppliersRequire disclosure of all persons involved in

preparing and submitting bidsUsed sealed or anonymous bid processes if

appropriateRequire “no collusion,” “independent prices,” or

“no contact” certifications

Page 30: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

30

Sample Certificate of Independent Price Determination

Bid offeror must certify:(1) The prices in this offer have been arrived at independently, without,

for the purpose of restricting competition, any consultation, communication, or agreement with any other offeror or competitor relating to (i) those prices, (ii) the intention to submit an offer, or (iii) the methods or factors used to calculate the prices offered;

(2) The prices in this offer have not been and will not be knowingly disclosed by the offeror, directly or indirectly, to any other offeror or competitor before bid opening (in the case of a sealed bid solicitation) or contract award (in the case of a negotiated solicitation) unless otherwise required by law; and

(3) No attempt has been made or will be made by the offeror to induce any other concern to submit or not to submit an offer for the purpose of restricting competition.

Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR"), 48 C.F.R. § 52.203-2

Page 31: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

31

What you can do to encourage competition and discourage collusion

After the Bid Review bids carefully for patternsCarefully consider what information is made

public when a bid is awarded to avoid unnecessarily educating competitors

Do not disqualify bidders from future contracts if they fail to submit a bid

Maintain procurement records

Page 32: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Red Flags of Collusion “MAPS”

M = MARKET• Who is in the market for this award?

A = APPLICATIONS• Are there similarities between vendor applications or proposals?

P = PATTERNS• Have patterns developed among competing vendors?

S = SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR• Have vendors demonstrated behavior that suggests that they

worked together on the award?

32

Page 33: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Contact Us

Washington Criminal IISection

Main Number: 202-598-4000

Leah McCoyTrial Attorney

[email protected](202) 598-8072

Citizen [email protected] Complaint Center

Antitrust Division 950 Pennsylvania Ave. NWRoom 3322 Washington, DC 20530

(888) 647-3258 or 202-307-2040

33

Page 34: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

Questions?

34

Page 35: Preventing and Detecting Collusion & Fraud in Public Procurement Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement October 5, 2015 Leah McCoy U.S. Department

35

Resources

Visit the Division Website’s Criminal Page: http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/criminal.htm

Antitrust Primer for Federal Law Enforcement Personnelhttp://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/209114.htm

Economic Recovery Act Initiative http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/criminal/economic-

recovery.html