prince&links-medical imaging signals&systems allslides 2009

412
Medical Imaging Signals and Systems Jerry L. Prince Johns Hopkins University August 20, 2009 Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 1 / 412

Upload: recep-tugci

Post on 28-Nov-2014

1.078 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Medical Imaging Signals and Systems

Jerry L. Prince

Johns Hopkins University

August 20, 2009

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 1 / 412

Page 2: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

AcknowledgementsThese notes are intended to be used with the thetextbook:

▶ Jerry L. Prince and Jonathan M. Links,“Medical Imaging Signals and Systems,” UpperSaddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006.

Images and figures lacking a specific bibliographiccitation are either taken from this book and thecopyright is owned by Pearson Prentice Hall or werehand drawn by Jerry Prince.

Images and figures with specific bibliographiccitations are used with permission of the copyrightholder.

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 2 / 412

Page 3: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Outline

Outline I

1 Introduction to Medical Imaging Systems

2 Multidimensional Signal Processing

3 Image Quality

4 Physics of Radiography

5 Projection Radiography

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 3 / 412

Page 4: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Outline

Outline II6 Computed Tomography

7 Physics of Nuclear Medicine

8 Planar Scintigraphy

9 Emission Tomography

10 Ultrasound Physics

11 Ultrasound Imaging

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 4 / 412

Page 5: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Outline

Outline III12 Physics of Magnetic Resonance

13 Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 5 / 412

Page 6: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Introduction to Medical Imaging Systems

1 Introduction to Medical Imaging SystemsOverall PerspectivePossible objectivesSignals Examples

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 6 / 412

Page 7: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Introduction to Medical Imaging Systems Overall Perspective

Overall PerspectiveCourse breakdown

▶ 1/3 physics▶ 1/3 instrumentation▶ 1/3 signal processing

Understand systems from a “signals” viewpoint:

input signal→ system or process→ output signal

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 7 / 412

Page 8: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Introduction to Medical Imaging Systems Overall Perspective

A Signal Example

ExampleInput signal: �(x , y) is the linear attenuationcoefficient for x-rays

Process (integration over x variable):

g(y) =

∫�(x , y)dx

Output signal: g(y)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 8 / 412

Page 9: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Introduction to Medical Imaging Systems Possible objectives

Possible objectivesunderstand “noise” or “artifacts” created by system

understand “contrast” in input and output

process output to create a “picture” of input

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 9 / 412

Page 10: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Introduction to Medical Imaging Systems Signals Examples

Examples of Signals in Medical Imaging�(x , y , z), linear attenuation coefficient in x-rays

h(x , y , z), CT numbers in computed tomography

A(x , y , z), radioactivity in nuclear medicine

Chest X-ray Abdominal CT Cardiac SPECT

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 10 / 412

Page 11: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Introduction to Medical Imaging Systems Signals Examples

More ExamplesPD(x , y , z), proton density in MRI imaging

T1(x , y , z), longitudinal relaxation time in MRI

T2(x , y , z), transverse relaxation time in MRI

PD-weighted T2-weighted T1-weighted

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 11 / 412

Page 12: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Introduction to Medical Imaging Systems Signals Examples

More ExamplesR(x , y , z), reflectivity in ultrasound imaging

vR(x , y , z), range component of velocity in Dopplerultrasound

11-week Embryo Fetus Heart

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 12 / 412

Page 13: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing

2 Multidimensional Signal ProcessingMultidimensional SignalsDelta FunctionsSystemsFourier TransformRect and SincHankel TransformSamplingAliasingArea Detectors

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 13 / 412

Page 14: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Multidimensional Signals

1D, 2D, and 3D SignalsA 1D signal is:

▶ f (t), a function of one variable, or▶ a waveform, or▶ a graph (a collection of points in a 2D space)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 14 / 412

Page 15: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Multidimensional Signals

A 2D signal is:▶ f (x , y), a function of two variables, or▶ an image, or▶ a graph (a collection of points in a 3D space)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 15 / 412

Page 16: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Multidimensional Signals

A 3D signal is:▶ f (x , y , z), a function of three variables, or▶ a “volumetric image,” or▶ a graph (a collection of points in a 4D space)

We focus (mostly) on 2D signals in this course

Separable signals:▶ f (x , y) = f1(x)f2(y)▶ f (x , y , z) = f1(x)f2(y)f3(z)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 16 / 412

Page 17: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Delta Functions

Delta FunctionsThe 1D delta or impulse “function” is defined bytwo properties:

�(x) = 0 , x ∕= 0∫∞−∞ f (x)�(x)dx = f (0)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 17 / 412

Page 18: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Delta Functions

Properties of the Delta FunctionThe area of �(x) is unity∫ ∞

−∞�(x)dx = 1

A 2D delta function �(x , y) is defined by

�(x , y) = 0 , (x , y) ∕= 0∫∞−∞∫∞−∞ f (x , y)�(x , y)dx dy = f (0, 0)

A 3D delta function is analogous.

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 18 / 412

Page 19: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Delta Functions

More PropertiesProperties of delta functions:

�(−x) = �(x) even

�(x , y) = �(x)�(y) separable∫ ∞−∞

f (�)�(� − x)d� = f (x) sifting

2D sifting property∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

f (�, �)�(� − x , � − y)d�d� = f (x , y)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 19 / 412

Page 20: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Delta Functions

Point Source Modeldelta function models a point source

▶ metal bead in x-ray▶ vial of radioactivity in nuclear medicine▶ vitamin E pill in magnetic resonance imaging▶ small bubble or microcalcification in ultrasound

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 20 / 412

Page 21: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Systems

Transformations of SignalsComponents of a transformation:

▶ Input: f▶ System: ℋ[⋅]▶ Output: g

The impulse response or point spread function dueto an impulse at (�, �) is

h(x , y ; �, �) = ℋ[�(x − �, y − �)]

h(x , y ; �, �) is a 2D signal parameterized by a 2Dvector

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 21 / 412

Page 22: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Systems

A linear system satisfies:

ℋ[w1f1 + w2f2] = w1ℋ[f1] + w2ℋ[f2]

for all signals f1 and f2 and weights w1 and w2.

A linear system satisfies the superposition integral

g(x , y) =

∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

h(x , y ; �, �)f (�, �)d�d�

We model most medical imaging systems as linear.

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 22 / 412

Page 23: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Systems

Shift-Invariant SystemsA system is shift-invariant is

g(x − x0, y − y0) = ℋ[f (x − x0, y − y0)]

for every (x0, y0) and f (⋅, ⋅).

A linear shift-invariant (LSI) system yields

h(x , y ; �, �)→ h(x − �, y − �)

[Watch out for abuse of notation]

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 23 / 412

Page 24: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Systems

Convolution IntegralAn LSI system satisfies the convolution integral

g(x , y) =

∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

h(x − �, y − �)f (�, �)d�d�

which is abbreviated as

g(x , y) = h(x , y) ∗ f (x , y)

We model most medical imaging systems as LSI

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 24 / 412

Page 25: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Fourier Transform

LSI Systems and Complex ExponentialsA 2D complex exponential signal is

e j2�(ux+vy) = e j2�uxe j2�vy i.e., separable

wheree j2�ux = cos 2�ux + j sin 2�ux

The response of an LSI system to

f (x , y) = e j2�(ux+vy)

isg(x , y) = H(u, v)e j2�(ux+vy)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 25 / 412

Page 26: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Fourier Transform

The function

H(u, v) =

∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

h(x , y)e−j2�(ux+vy)dxdy

H(u, v) is called the Fourier transform of h(x , y).

The inverse Fourier transform of H(u, v) is

h(x , y) =

∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

H(u, v)e+j2�(ux+vy)dudv

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 26 / 412

Page 27: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Fourier Transform

Magnitude of the 2D Fourier Transform

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 27 / 412

Page 28: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Fourier Transform

Comments on the Fourier TransformNotation:

F (u, v) = ℱ{f }

=

∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

f (x , y)e−j2�(ux+vy)dxdy

f (x , y) = ℱ−1{F}

=

∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

F (u, v)e+j2�(ux+vy)dudv

e j2�(ux+vy) is a complex sinusoid “oriented” in the(u, v) direction

2�ux has units of radians

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 28 / 412

Page 29: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Fourier Transform

⇒ ux is unitless

⇒ x has units of length, e.g., cm or mm

⇒ u has units of inverse length, e.g., cm−1 ormm−1.

u is referred to as (cyclic) spatial frequency

The 1D Fourier transform pair is given by

F (u) =

∫ ∞−∞

f (x)e−j2�uxdx

f (x) =

∫ ∞−∞

F (u)e+j2�uxdu

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 29 / 412

Page 30: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Fourier Transform

Properties of the Fourier Transform[Refer to text for complete list]

Linearity:

ℱ{w1f1 + w2f2} = w1F1 + w2F2

Scaling:

ℱ{f (�x , �y)} =1

∣��∣F (

u

�,v

�)

Shifting:

ℱ{f (x − �, y − �)} = F (u, v)e−j2�(u�+v�)

ℱ{f (x , y)e+j2�(�x+�y)} = F (u − �, v − �)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 30 / 412

Page 31: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Fourier Transform

Convolution:

ℱ{f1 ∗ f2} = F1F2

Correlation:

ℱ{∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

f1(�, �)f ∗2 (x + �, y + �)d�d�

}= F1(u, v)F ∗2 (u, v)

Separable input: If f (x , y) = f1(x)f2(y) then

ℱ{f (x , y)} = F1(u)F2(v)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 31 / 412

Page 32: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Fourier Transform

Parseval’s theorem:∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞∣f (x , y)∣2dxdy

=

∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞∣F (u, v)∣2dudv

Product:

ℱ{f1(x , y)f2(x , y)} = F1(u, v) ∗ F2(u, v)

Impulse:ℱ{�(x , y)} = 1

Constant:ℱ{1} = �(u, v)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 32 / 412

Page 33: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Fourier Transform

Sinusoid (1D):

ℱ{sin 2�u0x} =1

2j[�(u − u0)− �(u + u0)]

ℱ{cos 2�u0x} =1

2[�(u − u0) + �(u + u0)]

Sinusoid (2D):

ℱ{sin 2�(u0x + v0y)}

=1

2j[�(u − u0, v − v0)− �(u + u0, v + v0)]

ℱ{cos 2�(u0x + v0y)}

=1

2[�(u − u0, v − v0) + �(u + u0, v + v0)]

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 33 / 412

Page 34: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Rect and Sinc

Rect and SincRect function: (“gate” or “pedestal”)

rect(x) =

{1 ∣x ∣ ≤ 1/20 otherwise

Sinc function:

sinc(x) =sin �x

�x

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 34 / 412

Page 35: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Rect and Sinc

Fourier transform relationship:

ℱ{rect(x)} = sinc(u)

x

sinc( )x

1

−1 1 2 3 40−2−3−4

rect( )x

x1 / 2−1 / 2

1

0

(a) (b)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 35 / 412

Page 36: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Hankel Transform

RotationRotation:

f�(x , y) = f (x cos � − y sin �, x sin � + y cos �)

Fourier transform rotates also

ℱ2D(f�)(u, v)

= F (u cos � − v sin �, u sin � + v cos �)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 36 / 412

Page 37: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Hankel Transform

Circular Symmetry2D signal is circularly symmetric if

f�(x , y) = f (x , y) , for every �

ℱ2D(f�)(u, v) is also circularly symmetric

f (x , y) and F (u, v) are functions of radii only

f (x , y) = f (r)

andF (u, v) = F (q)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 37 / 412

Page 38: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Hankel Transform

Hankel TransformFourier transform of circularly symmetric objects isdescribed by the Hankel transform

F (q) = 2�

∫ ∞0

f (r)J0(2�qr) r dr

J0(r) is zero-order Bessel function of the first kind

J0(r) =1

∫ �

0

cos(r sin�) d�

Example pair:

ℋ{exp{−�r 2}} = exp{−�q2}Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 38 / 412

Page 39: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Sampling

Sampling

x

y

∆x

∆y

∆x

∆y

x

y

Point sampling:

f [m, n] = f (mΔx , nΔy)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 39 / 412

Page 40: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Sampling

Impulse TrainsImpulse train or comb or shah function:

comb(x) =∞∑

n=−∞�(x − n)

Fourier transform relationship

ℱ{comb(x)} = comb(u)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 40 / 412

Page 41: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Sampling

Sampling FunctionThe sampling function:

�s(x ; Δx) =∞∑

n=−∞�(x − nΔx)

Impulse scaling property:

�(ax) =1

∣a∣�(x)

Relation to shah/comb function:

�s(x ; Δx) =1

Δxcomb

( x

Δx

)Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 41 / 412

Page 42: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Sampling

Sampling Model (see text for 2D)Sampled signal

fs(x) = f (x)�s(x ; Δx)

fs(x) contains the same information as

f [k] = f (kΔx)

Fourier transform of fs(x):

Fs(u) = F (u) ∗ ℱ{�s(x ; Δx)}

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 42 / 412

Page 43: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Sampling

Sampled SpectrumFourier transform of sampling function:

ℱ{�s(x ; Δx)} = comb(Δxu)

=1

Δx

∞∑−∞

�(u − n

Δx)

Sampled spectrum is therefore:

Fs(u) =1

Δx

∞∑−∞

F (u) ∗ �(u − n

Δx)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 43 / 412

Page 44: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Sampling

Sampled Spectrum in 2D

u

vF u v( , )

V

−V

U−U

v

u

F u vs ( , )

(a) (b)

1 2/ ∆y

−1 2/ ∆y

1

2∆x

1 / ∆y

−1 / ∆y

−1 / ∆x 1 / ∆x

U−U

V

−V

1

2∆x

v

u

F u vs ( , )

−1 /∆y

−1 / ∆x 1 / ∆x

1 /∆y

U

−V

V

−U

aliasing

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 44 / 412

Page 45: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Sampling

Sampling TheoremThe (spatial) sampling frequency is:

us =1

Δx

Let U be the highest frequency in F (u).

Then sampled spectra do not overlap if

us > 2U

2U is called the Nyquist rate

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 45 / 412

Page 46: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Aliasing

AliasingAliasing occurs if us < 2U .

▶ Overlapping sampled spectra.▶ Corruption of high frequencies▶ Artifacts are high frequency patternsv

u

F u vs ( , )

−1 /∆y

−1 / ∆x 1 / ∆x

1 /∆y

U

−V

V

−U

aliasing

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 46 / 412

Page 47: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Aliasing

Anti-aliasing FiltersSuppose:

▶ us = 1/Δx▶ Highest frequency in f (x) is U .

Filter f (x):▶ before sampling▶ Use low pass filter with cutoff frequency us/2.

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 47 / 412

Page 48: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Multidimensional Signal Processing Area Detectors

Area Detector AnalysisShape of detector: p(x) [maybe rect(x/D)]

Area detector sampling model:

fs(x) = [p(x) ∗ f (x)]�s(x ; Δx)

Fourier domain:

Fs(u) = [P(u)F (u)] ∗ comb(Δxu)

= [P(u)F (u)] ∗ 1

Δx

∞∑n=−∞

�(u − n

Δx

)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 48 / 412

Page 49: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality

3 Image QualityBasic NotionsContrastResolutionNoiseArtifactsAccuracy

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 49 / 412

Page 50: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Basic Notions

What is Quality?What makes a good medical image?

▶ physics-oriented answer:faithful representation of the truth

▶ task-oriented answer:discrimination of healthy vs. diseasedtissues

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 50 / 412

Page 51: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Basic Notions

Measures of QualityPhysics-oriented issues:

▶ contrast, resolution▶ noise, artifacts, distortion▶ accuracy

Task-oriented issues:▶ sensitivity, specificity▶ diagnostic accuracy

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 51 / 412

Page 52: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Contrast

Contrast or ModulationSinusoidal image brightness function:

f (x , y) =fmax + fmin

2

+fmax − fmin

2sin(2�u0x)

Contrast = modulation =

mf =amplitude

average=

fmax − fmin

fmax + fmin

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 52 / 412

Page 53: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Contrast

Sinusoidal Signals with Different Contrast

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 53 / 412

Page 54: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Contrast

Sinusoid Input/Output in a Linear SystemInput: (assume f ≥ 0)

f (x , y) = A + B sin(2�u0x)

Assume impulse response h(x , y) is real

Output:

g(x , y) = H(0, 0)A

+ ∣H(u0, 0)∣B sin[2�u0x + ∠H(u0, 0)]

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 54 / 412

Page 55: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Contrast

Contrast Change in a Linear SystemInput contrast: mf = B/A

Output contrast:

mg =∣H(u0, 0)∣BH(0, 0)A

=∣H(u0, 0)∣H(0, 0)

mf

A B+

A B-

A

A B H u+ | ( , )|0

A B H u- | ( , )|0

mB

Af = m

B

AH ug = | ( , )|0

medical

imaging

system

input f x y( , ) output g x y( , )

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 55 / 412

Page 56: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Contrast

Modulation Transfer FunctionModulation transfer function:

MTF(u) =mg

mf=∣H(u, 0)∣H(0, 0)

spatial frequency u

0 8. mm-1

0

1 0.

MTF( )u

0 6.0 2. 0.4 1 0. 1 2. 1.4

0 5.

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 56 / 412

Page 57: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Contrast

More on Modulation Transfer FunctionGeneral case

MTF(u, v) =∣H(u, v)∣H(0, 0)

MTF is partial characterization of real system

Rule of thumb:▶ ∣H(u, v)∣ holds 1/8 of info▶ ∠H(u, v) hold 7/8 of info

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 57 / 412

Page 58: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Contrast

Contrast is Related to Resolution

decreasing contrast

MTF

outp

ut si

gna

l

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 58 / 412

Page 59: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Contrast

Local ContrastNon-sinusoidal signals: identify

▶ target intensity: ft▶ background intensity: fb

Local contrast:

C =ft − fbfb

Optional:▶ C (%) = C × 100%▶ C (abs) = ∣C ∣

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 59 / 412

Page 60: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Resolution

Resolution: Bar Phantom

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 60 / 412

Page 61: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Resolution

Bar Phantom Properties50% duty cycle

Material depends on modality▶ metal or plexiglass bars▶ tubes of radioactivity

resolution defined as the highest line density suchthat lines can be distinguished

units: line pairs (lp) per distance▶ gamma camera: 2–3 lp/cm▶ CT: 2 lp/mm▶ chest x-ray: 6–8 lp/mm

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 61 / 412

Page 62: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Resolution

Resolution: Line ResponseLine “function”:

f (x , y) = �(x)

Line response:

l(x) = S{�(x)} =

∫ ∞−∞

h(x , �)d�

Relation to MTF:

MTF(u) =∣L(u)∣L(0)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 62 / 412

Page 63: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Resolution

Resolution: Line Separation

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 63 / 412

Page 64: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Resolution

Resolution: FWHMFull Width at Half Maximum (FWHM)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 64 / 412

Page 65: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Noise

Noise: Random VariablesTypical imaging model:

g(x , y) = f (x , y) ∗ h(x , y) + N(x , y)

N(x , y) is noise

N(x , y) is a random variable at each (x , y)

N(x , y) could be continuous or discrete

Probability Distribution Function (PDF)

PN(�) = Pr[N ≤ �]

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 65 / 412

Page 66: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Noise

Continuous Random VariablesProbability density function (pdf):

pN(�) =dPN(�)

d�

Mean:

�N =

∫ ∞−∞

�pN(�)d�

Variance:

�2N =

∫ ∞−∞

(� − �)2pN(�)d�

Standard deviation:

�N =√�2N

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 66 / 412

Page 67: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Noise

Gaussian Random Variablepdf

pN(�) =1√

2��2e−(�−�)2/2�2

mean:�N = �

variance:�2N = �2

standard deviation:

�N = �

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 67 / 412

Page 68: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Noise

Discrete Random VariablesProbability mass function (PMF):

pN(�i) = Pr[N = �i ]

Mean:�N =

∑all �i

�ipN(�i)

Variance:

�2N =

∑all �i

(�i − �N)2pN(�i)

Standard deviation:

�N =√�2N

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 68 / 412

Page 69: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Noise

Poisson Random VariablePMF

pN(k) =ake−a

k!, for k = 0, 1, . . .

mean:�N = a

variance:�2N = a

standard deviation:

�N =√a

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 69 / 412

Page 70: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Noise

Sum of Independent Random VariablesLet N and M be joint random variables

Let Q = N + M

Then�Q = �N + �M

If N and M are independent then

�2Q = �2

N + �2M

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 70 / 412

Page 71: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Noise

Images Degrade with NoiseNoise level depends on modality and acquisitionparameters

Fast imaging is almost always noisier

Low dose imaging is almost always noisier

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 71 / 412

Page 72: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Noise

Signals in NoiseSignal is f

Noise is N

Signal-to-noise ratio

SNRa =amplitude(f )

amplitude(N)

SNRp =power(f )

power(N)

Hint: Units must match

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 72 / 412

Page 73: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Noise

More on Signal-to-noiseSNR in decibels

SNR(dB) = 20 log10 SNRa

SNR(dB) = 10 log10 SNRp

Common example of SNR▶ signal height is A▶ noise standard deviation is �N▶ SNR is then

SNRa =A

�N

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 73 / 412

Page 74: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Noise

Noise and Blurring Degrade Quality

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 74 / 412

Page 75: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Artifacts

Nonrandom EffectsArtifacts: image features that do not correspond toa real object, and are not due to noise

▶ star artifact, beam hardening artifact▶ ring artifact, ghosts

Distortion: geometric or intensity changes notcorresponding to the real object

▶ magnification▶ barrel or pincushion distortion▶ quantization, saturation

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 75 / 412

Page 76: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Artifacts

Common Artifacts

(a) motion(b) star(c) hardening(d) ring

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 76 / 412

Page 77: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Accuracy

AccuracyAccuracy:

▶ conformity to truth→ quantitative accuracy

▶ clinical utility→ diagnostic accuracy

Quantitative accuracy:▶ numerical accuracy: bias, precision▶ geometric accuracy: dimensions

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 77 / 412

Page 78: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Accuracy

Diagnostic QualityContingency table:

Disease

+ −

+ a b

Test

− c d

Variables:

a = # w/ disease & test says disease

b = # w/o disease & test says disease

c = # w/ disease & test says normal

d = # w/o disease & test says normal

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 78 / 412

Page 79: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Accuracy

Diagnostic Accuracy

sensitivity =a

a + c

specificity =d

b + d

diagnostic accuracy =a + d

a + b + c + d

Disease

+ −

+ a b

Test

− c d

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 79 / 412

Page 80: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Image Quality Accuracy

Disease Prevalence

positive predictive value =a

a + b

negative predictive value =d

c + d

prevalence =a + c

a + b + c + d

Disease

+ −

+ a b

Test

− c d

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 80 / 412

Page 81: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography

4 Physics of RadiographyX-ray ModalitiesAtomic StructureIonizing RadiationEnergetic ElectronsElectromagnetic RadiationEM StrengthEM AttenuationEM Dose

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 81 / 412

Page 82: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography X-ray Modalities

X-ray ModalitiesChest x-rays

Mammography

Dental x-rays

Fluoroscopy

Angiography

Computed tomography

These do not involve radioactivity

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 82 / 412

Page 83: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Atomic Structure

Atomic Structurenucleons = {protons, neutrons}mass number A is # nucleons

atomic number Z is # protons

element symbol X is redundant with Z

nuclide is particular combination of nucleons▶

ZAX

▶ X -A

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 83 / 412

Page 84: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Atomic Structure

ElectronsOrbit in shells

Shell Number n Shell Label # Electrons 2n2

1 K ≤ 22 L ≤ 83 M ≤ 184 N ≤ 32

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 84 / 412

Page 85: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Atomic Structure

Electron Binding EnergyBasic principle:

bound energy < unbound energy + electron energy

Binding energy is difference

Binding energy of hydrogen electron: 13.6 eV

1 eV is the kinetic energy gained by an electron thatis accelerated across a one (1) volt potential

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 85 / 412

Page 86: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Atomic Structure

Ionization and ExcitationIonization is “knocking” an electron out of atom

▶ creates electron + ion

Excitation is “knocking” an electron to a higherorbit

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 86 / 412

Page 87: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Atomic Structure

Characteristic RadiationWhat happens to ionized or excited atom?

Return to ground state by rearrangement ofelectrons

Causes atom to give off energy

Energy given off as characteristic radiation▶ infrared▶ light▶ x-rays

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 87 / 412

Page 88: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Ionizing Radiation

Ionizing RadiationRadiation with energy > 13.6 eV is ionizing

Energy required to ionize:

▶ air ≈ 34 eV▶ lead ≈ 1 keV▶ tungsten ≈ 4 keV

These are average binding energies.

Radiation energies in medical imaging30 keV–511 keV

can ionize 10–40,000 atoms

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 88 / 412

Page 89: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Ionizing Radiation

Particulate RadiationConcerned with electron here (x-ray tube)(positron in later chapters)

Relativistic theory required (see text)

An electron accelerated across 100 kVpotential difference yields a 100 keV electron

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 89 / 412

Page 90: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Ionizing Radiation

Electromagnetic EM RadiationMany types of EM radiation:

▶ radio, microwaves,▶ infrared, visible light, ultraviolet▶ x-rays, gamma rays

electric and magnetic wave at right angles▶ waves with frequency �, or▶ “particles” (photons) with energy E

E = h–�

Planck’s constant h– = 4.14× 10−15 eV-sec

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 90 / 412

Page 91: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Energetic Electrons

Energetic Electron InteractionsTwo primary interactions:

▶ collisional transfer▶ radiative transfer

Collisional transfer:▶ Electron hits other electrons▶ Occasionally produces delta ray

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 91 / 412

Page 92: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Energetic Electrons

Energetic Electrons: Radiative TransferTwo types of radiative transfer:

▶ characteristic x-rays▶ bremsstrahlung x-rays

Characteristic x-rays:▶ electron ejects a K-shell electron▶ reorganization generates x-ray

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 92 / 412

Page 93: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Energetic Electrons

Energetic Electrons: BremsstrahlungBremsstrahlung x-rays

▶ Electron “grazes” nucleus, slows down▶ Energy loss generates x-ray

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 93 / 412

Page 94: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Energetic Electrons

X-ray Spectrum

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 94 / 412

Page 95: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Electromagnetic Radiation

EM InteractionsTwo important interactions:

▶ Photoelectric effect▶ Compton scattering

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 95 / 412

Page 96: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Electromagnetic Radiation

Photoelectric effectAtom completely absorbs incident photon

All energy is transferred

Atom produces▶ characteristic radiation, and/or▶ energetic electron(s)

Characteristic radiation might be▶ x-ray, or▶ light ← very important

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 96 / 412

Page 97: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Electromagnetic Radiation

Illustration of Photoelectric Effect

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 97 / 412

Page 98: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Electromagnetic Radiation

Compton ScatteringPhoton collides with outer-shell electron

Photon is deflected, angle �

Deflected photon has lower energy:

E ′ =E

1 + E (1− cos �)/(m0c2)

m0 is rest mass of electron

m0c2 = 511 keV

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 98 / 412

Page 99: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Electromagnetic Radiation

Illustration of Compton Scattering

When E higher▶ more Compton events scatter forward▶ Compton more of a problem

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 99 / 412

Page 100: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography Electromagnetic Radiation

Probability of EM InteractionsPhotoelectric effect:

Prob[photoelectric event] ∝Z 4

eff(h–�)3

Photons are more penetrating at higherfrequencies/energies

Compton scattering:

Prob[Compton event] ∝ ED

ED approximately constant over diagnostic range

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 100 / 412

Page 101: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Strength

Beam Strength: Photon CountsPhoton fluence:

Φ =N

APhoton fluence rate:

� =N

AΔt

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 101 / 412

Page 102: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Strength

Beam Strength: Energy FlowEnergy fluence:

Ψ =Nh–�

AEnergy fluence rate:

=Nh–�

AΔt

Intensity: (= )

I (E ) =NE

AΔt

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 102 / 412

Page 103: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Strength

Polyenergetic Beam StrengthX-ray spectrum S(E ):

▶ S(E ) is the number of photons per unit energyper unit area per unit time

Photon fluence rate from spectrum:

� =

∫ ∞0

S(E ′) dE ′

Intensity from spectrum:

I =

∫ ∞0

E ′S(E ′) dE ′

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 103 / 412

Page 104: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Attenuation

EM Attenuation Geometries

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 104 / 412

Page 105: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Attenuation

“Good Geometry”, MonoenergeticNon-homogeneous slab:

dN

N= −�(x)dx

Integration yields:

N(x) = N0 exp{−∫ x

0

�(x ′)dx ′}

For intensity:

I (x) = I0 exp{−∫ x

0

�(x ′)dx ′}

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 105 / 412

Page 106: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Attenuation

Homogeneous SlabHomogeneous slab thickness Δx

Fundamental photon attenuation law

N = N0e−�Δx

� is linear attenuation coefficient

In terms of intensity:

I = I0e−�Δx

This is known as Beer’s Law

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 106 / 412

Page 107: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Attenuation

Half-value LayerHomogeneous slab (shielding)

HVL = thickness that willstop half the photons

1

2= exp{−� HVL}

Relation to �

HVL =0.693

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 107 / 412

Page 108: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Attenuation

“Good Geometry”, PolyenergeticMust deal with x-ray spectrum S0(E )

Abandon photon counting: use intensityFor heterogeneous materials

I (x) =

∫ ∞0

S0(E ′)E ′ exp

{−∫ x

0

�(x ′;E ′)dx ′}dE ′

Not very useful

Better to define effective energy,use monoenergetic approximation

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 108 / 412

Page 109: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Attenuation

Mass Attenuation Coefficientmass attenuation coefficient �/�

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 109 / 412

Page 110: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Dose

EM Radiation DoseHow many photons? → fluence

How much energy? → energy fluence

What does radiation do to matter?→ dose

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 110 / 412

Page 111: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Dose

Exposure: (the creation of ions)How many ions are created?

Exposure X , the number of ion pairs produced in aspecific volume of air by EM radiation

SI Units: C/kg

Common Units: roentgen, R

1 C/kg = 3876 R

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 111 / 412

Page 112: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Dose

Dose: (the deposition of energy)How much energy is deposited into material?

Dose, D, the energy deposited per unit volume

SI unit: Gray (Gy) 1 Gy = 1 J/kg

Common unit: rad

1 Gy = 100 rads

When X = 1 R soft tissue incurs 1 rad absorbeddose.

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 112 / 412

Page 113: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Radiography EM Dose

KermaHow much energy is deposited intothe electrons?

Kerma, K , is the energy deposited into the electronsof a material

SI units: Gray (Gy) = 1 J/kg = 100 rads

At diagnostic energies in the body, K = D

(In general, K ≥ D. Some electrons can causebremsstrahlung and their energy irradiated away →no dose. Not likely in body.)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 113 / 412

Page 114: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography

5 Projection RadiographyRadiographic SystemsX-ray TubesFiltration, Restriction, and Contrast AgentsScatter ControlScreen and CassetteImaging EquationFilmNoise

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 114 / 412

Page 115: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Radiographic Systems

Projection RadiographySystems:

▶ chest x-rays,mammography

▶ dental x-rays▶ fluoroscopy, angiography

Properties▶ high resolution▶ low dose▶ broad coverage▶ short exposure time

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 115 / 412

Page 116: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Radiographic Systems

Radiographic System

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 116 / 412

Page 117: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography X-ray Tubes

X-ray Tube Diagram

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 117 / 412

Page 118: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography X-ray Tubes

X-ray Tube Components

Filament controls tube current (mA)

Cathode and focussing cup

Anode is switched to high potential▶ 30–150 kVp▶ Made of tungsten▶ Bremsstrahlung is 1%▶ Heat is 99%▶ Spins at 3,200–3,600 rpm

Glass housing; vacuum

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 118 / 412

Page 119: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography X-ray Tubes

Exposure ControlkVp applied for short duration

▶ fixed timer (SCR), or▶ automatic exposure control (AEC), 5 mm thick

ionization chamber triggers SCR

Tube current mA controlled by▶ filament current, and▶ kVp

mA times exposure time yields mAs

mAs measures x-ray exposure

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 119 / 412

Page 120: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography X-ray Tubes

X-ray Spectra

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 120 / 412

Page 121: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Filtration, Restriction, and Contrast Agents

FiltrationInherent filtration

▶ Within anode▶ Glass housing

Added filtration▶ Aluminum▶ Copper/Aluminum

Note: Cu has 8keV characteristic xrays▶ Measured in mm Al/Eq

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 121 / 412

Page 122: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Filtration, Restriction, and Contrast Agents

RestrictionGoal: To direct beam toward desired anatomy

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 122 / 412

Page 123: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Filtration, Restriction, and Contrast Agents

Compensation FiltersGoal: to even out film exposure

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 123 / 412

Page 124: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Filtration, Restriction, and Contrast Agents

Contrast AgentsGoal: To create contrast where otherwise none

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 100 150 200150.1

1.0

10

100Li

ne

ar A

tte

nua

tion C

oe

ffic

ient (c

m)

-1

Photon Energy (keV)

Hypaque

Kedge

37.4muscle

soft tissue

Bone

Fat

Kedge

33.2

BaSO

mix4

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 124 / 412

Page 125: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Scatter Control

Scatter ControlIdeal x-ray path: a line!

Compton scattering causes blurring

How to reduce scatter?▶ airgap▶ scanning slit▶ grid

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 125 / 412

Page 126: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Scatter Control

Grids

Effectiveness in scatter reduction?

grid ratio =h

b

6:1 to 16:1 (radiography) or 2:1 (mammo)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 126 / 412

Page 127: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Scatter Control

Problems with GridsRadiation is absorbed by grid

▶ grid conversion factor

GCF =mAs w/ grid

mAs w/o grid

▶ Typical range 3 < GCF < 8

Grid visible on x-ray film▶ move grid during exposure▶ linear or circular motion

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 127 / 412

Page 128: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Screen and Cassette

Intensifying ScreenFilm stops only 1–2% of x-rays

Film stops light really well

Phosphor = calcium tungstate

Flash of light lasts 1× 10−10 second

∼1,000 light photons per 50 keV x-ray photon

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 128 / 412

Page 129: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Screen and Cassette

Radiographic Cassette

Cassette holds two screens; makes “sandwich”

One side is leaded

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 129 / 412

Page 130: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Basic Imaging Equation

I (x , y) =

∫ ∞0

S0(E ′)E ′ exp

{−∫ r(x ,y)

0

�(s;E ′, x , y)ds

}dE ′

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 130 / 412

Page 131: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Geometric EffectsX-rays are diverging from source

Undesirable effects:

▶ cos3 � falloff across detector▶ anode heel effect▶ pathlength irregularities▶ magnification

I0 is intensity at (0, 0)

r is distance from (x , y) to x-ray origin

� is angle between (0, 0) and (x , y)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 131 / 412

Page 132: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Inverse Square LawNet flux of photons decrease as 1/r 2.Therefore

I0 =IS

4�d2Ir =

IS4�r 2

Eliminate source intensity IS

Ir = I0d2

r 2

Since cos � = d/r

Ir = I0 cos2 �

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 132 / 412

Page 133: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Obliquity

Intensity isId = I0 cos �

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 133 / 412

Page 134: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Beam Divergence and Flat DetectorInverse square law and obliquity combine

Id(xd , yd) = I0 cos3 �

Can usually be ignored. Why?

▶ Detector is far away▶ Field of view (FOV) is often small

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 134 / 412

Page 135: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Anode Heel EffectIntensity within the x-ray cone

▶ Not uniform▶ stronger in the cathode direction▶ 45% variation is typical

Compensate, use to advantage, or ignore

We will ignore in math

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 135 / 412

Page 136: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Path Length of SlabUniform slab yields different intensities

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 136 / 412

Page 137: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Effect of Pathlength on IntensityIntensity on detector

Id(x , y) = I0 exp{−�L/ cos �}

Including inverse square law and obliquity:

Id(x , y) = Ii cos3 � exp{−�L/ cos �}

If d ≈ r all effects can be ignored

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 137 / 412

Page 138: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Object MagnificationSize on detector depends on distance from source

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 138 / 412

Page 139: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Magnification FormulaObject at position z from source

Height of object is w .

Height wz on detector is

wz = wd

z

Magnification is

M(z) =d

zCan lead to edge blurring and misleading sizes

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 139 / 412

Page 140: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Thin Slab Imaging EquationThin slab at z of �(x , y)Let “transmittivity” be

tz(x , y) = exp{−�(x , y)Δz}

On detector, intensity is

Id(x , y) = I0 cos3 � tz

(x

M(z),

y

M(z)

)After substitution

Id(x , y) = I0

(d√

d2 + x2 + y 2

)3

tz(xzd,yz

d

)Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 140 / 412

Page 141: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Sources of BlurringExtended source

Intensifier screen

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 141 / 412

Page 142: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Extended Source

z

d

ExtendedX-raySource

Image ofExtendedSource

PointHole

DetectorPlane

s x y( , )D

Source spatial distribution: s(x , y)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 142 / 412

Page 143: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Source MagnificationSource diameter on detector:

D ′ =d − z

zD

Source magnification:

m(z) = −d − z

z= 1−M(z)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 143 / 412

Page 144: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Source BlurringImage of source through pinhole at z

Id(x , y) =1

4�d2m2s( xm,y

m

)Intensity at detector:

Id(x , y) =cos3 �

4�d2m2tz( x

M,y

M

)∗ s( xm,y

m

)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 144 / 412

Page 145: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Film-Screen BlurringFilm

X-rayPhoton

r

x

L

Light Photons

Phosphors

Film-screen impulse response: h(x , y)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 145 / 412

Page 146: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Imaging Equation

Overall Imaging EquationInclude all geometric effects

Id(x , y) = cos3 �1

4�d2m2s( xm,y

m

)∗ tz

( x

M,y

M

)∗ h(x , y)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 146 / 412

Page 147: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Film

FilmDeveloped film

Optical transmissivity

T =ItIi

Optical density

D = log10

IiIt

Note: O = 1/T is optical opacity

Usable densities 0.25 < D < 2.25

Best densities 1.0 < D < 1.5

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 147 / 412

Page 148: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Film

H & D CurveOptical density from x-ray exposurefor film-screen combination:

10-1

100

101

102

103

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

(a) High Speed

Film with

CaWO

Screens4

(b) Direct X-ray

Film

(c) High Speed

Film Without

Screens

Fog Level

Exposure, mR

Op

tica

l De

nsi

ty

Toe

Linear

Region

Shoulder

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 148 / 412

Page 149: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Film

X-ray Exposure to Film DensityX-ray exposure yields optical density

D = Γ log10

X

X0

Γ is film gamma

Typical ranges: 0.5 < Γ < 3.0

Latitude is range exposures where relationship islinear

Speed is inverse of exposure at which

D = 1 + fog level

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 149 / 412

Page 150: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Noise

NoiseLocal contrast

C =It − IbIb

Signal is It − IbNoise is due to Poisson behavior

Variance of noise in background: �2b

Signal to noise

SNR =It − Ib�b

=CIb�b

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 150 / 412

Page 151: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Noise

Signal-to-noiseModel x-ray burst as monoenergetic

▶ effective energy is h�▶ background intensity is

Ib =Nbh�

AΔt

Signal-to-noise is

SNR = C√

Nb

More photons is better

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 151 / 412

Page 152: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Noise

Detective Quantum EfficiencyHow good is a detector?

Consider:▶ Potential SNR before detection▶ Actual SNR upon detection

Detective Quantum Efficiency

DQE =

(SNRoutSNRin

)2

Degradation of SNR during detection

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 152 / 412

Page 153: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Projection Radiography Noise

Compton ScatterCompton adds intensity “fog”: IsResulting contrast

C ′ =C

1 + Is/Ib

Resulting SNR

SNR′ =SNR√

1 + Is/Ib

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 153 / 412

Page 154: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography

6 Computed TomographyOverviewCT GenerationsSystem ComponentsCT MeasurementsRadon TransformReconstructionProjection-Slice TheoremResolutionNoiseFan Beam Reconstruction

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 154 / 412

Page 155: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Overview

Computed TomographyTomography:

▶ image of slice▶ removes “overlaying structure”▶ improves contrast within slice

Computed:▶ requires computer▶ reconstruction algorithm

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 155 / 412

Page 156: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Overview

1-D Projection“fan beam” collimation

row of electronic detectors

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 156 / 412

Page 157: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Overview

Premise of CTA single 1-D projection is not informative

Many 1-D projections▶ permit slice reconstruction▶ many angular views is the key

http://www.gehealthcare.com

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 157 / 412

Page 158: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography CT Generations

1G CT Scanner

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 158 / 412

Page 159: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography CT Generations

2G CT Scanner

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 159 / 412

Page 160: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography CT Generations

3G CT Scanner

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 160 / 412

Page 161: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography CT Generations

4G CT Scanner

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 161 / 412

Page 162: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography CT Generations

Electron Beam (5G) CT Scanner

http://radiology.rsnajnls.org

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 162 / 412

Page 163: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography CT Generations

Gantry, Slipring, and Table

http://www.gehealthcare.com http://www.cissincorp.com

1–2 revolutions per secondJerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 163 / 412

Page 164: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography CT Generations

Helical (6G) CT ScannerStep-wise table movement yields stack of 2D slices

Continuous table movement yields stream of 1Dprojections

3D volume is reconstructed from helical acquisition

http://imaging.cancer.gov

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 164 / 412

Page 165: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography CT Generations

Multi-slice (7G) CT ScannerFeatures:

▶ 16–64 parallel detectorrows

▶ 14,336–57,344 detectorelements

▶ 20–80 mm detector“height”

▶ 16–64 0.5mm slices witheach second gantryrevolution

CT is becoming “cone beam”

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 165 / 412

Page 166: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography System Components

X-ray Tubes in CTUse only one tube

▶ exception: EBCT▶ exception: dual-source CT

80kVp–140kVp, continuous excitation▶ dual-energy is possible

fan-beam (1–10 mm thick), or

thin-cone collimation 20–80 mm

More filtering than projection radiography▶ copper followed by aluminum▶ Better approximation to monoenergetic

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 166 / 412

Page 167: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography System Components

CT DetectorsMost are solid-state:

▶ scintillation crystal▶ solid state photo-diode

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 167 / 412

Page 168: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography System Components

CT Detector SpecificationsSingle-slice scanners:

▶ Area: 1.0 mm × 15.0 mm▶ Thick in 3G, thin in 4G & EBCT

Multi-slice scanners:▶ Area: 1.0 mm × 1.25 mm▶ Grouped in multiples of 1.25 mm

Xenon gas detectors for less expensive scanners

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 168 / 412

Page 169: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography CT Measurements

CT Measurement ModelMonoenergetic model:

Id = I0 exp

{−∫ d

0

�(s; E )ds

}E is effective energy

E is that energy which in a given materialwill produce the same measured intensityfrom a monoenergetic source as from theactual polyenergetic source.

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 169 / 412

Page 170: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography CT Measurements

CT MeasurementObserve IdRearrange monoenergetic model:

gd = − lnIdI0

=

∫ d

0

�(s; E )ds

gd is a line integral of the linear attenuationcoefficient at the effective energy

Note: Requires calibration measurement of I0

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 170 / 412

Page 171: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography CT Measurements

CT NumbersConsistency across CT scanners desired

CT number is defined as:

h = 1000× �− �water�water

h has Hounsfield units (HU)

Usually rounded or truncated to nearestinteger

Range: −1,000 to ∼3,000

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 171 / 412

Page 172: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Radon Transform

Describing LinesPossible descriptions of lines:

▶ Functional: y = ax + b▶ Parametric: (x(s), y(s))▶ Set: {(x , y)∣(x , y) are on a line}

Critique:▶ Functional: what about vertical lines???▶ Parametric: good for model of process▶ Set: good for theory of reconstruction

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 172 / 412

Page 173: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Radon Transform

Picture of a Line

l

l

L( , )l θ

θ

f(x,y)

x

y

0

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 173 / 412

Page 174: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Radon Transform

Line ParametersDescribed by:

▶ Orientation or angle, �▶ Lateral translation or position, ℓ

Written as L(ℓ, �)

L(ℓ, �) = {(x , y)∣(x , y) are on the line

with position ℓ

and angle �}

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 174 / 412

Page 175: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Radon Transform

Line Integral: parametric formWhat is integral of f (x , y) on L(ℓ, �)?

Step 1: Parameterize L(ℓ, �):

x(s) = ℓ cos � − s sin �

y(s) = ℓ sin � + s cos �

Step 2: Integrate f (x , y) over parameter s

g(ℓ, �) =

∫ ∞−∞

f (x(s), y(s))ds

Use this form for the forward problem

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 175 / 412

Page 176: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Radon Transform

Line Integral: set formIntegrate over whole plane;non-zero only on L(ℓ, �)

Key is sifting property

q(ℓ) =

∫ ∞−∞

q(ℓ′)�(ℓ′ − ℓ)dℓ′

Use line impulse on L(ℓ, �)

g(ℓ, �) =∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

f (x , y)�(x cos � + y sin � − ℓ) dxdy

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 176 / 412

Page 177: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Radon Transform

Physical Meanings of f (x , y) and g(ℓ, �)Recall monoenergetic model:

Id = I0 exp

{−∫ d

0

�(s; E )ds

}Rearrange:

− lnIdI0

=

∫ d

0

�(x(s), y(s); E )ds

Relationship is:

f (x , y) = �(x , y ; E )

g(ℓ, �) = − lnIdI0

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 177 / 412

Page 178: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Radon Transform

What is g(ℓ, �)?Fix ℓ and �: line integral of f (x , y)

Fix �: projection of f (x , y) at angle �

Function of � and ℓ:g(ℓ, �) is the Radon transform of f (x , y)

g(ℓ, �) = ℛ{f (x , y)}

Transform . . . hmmm . . . can we find aninverse transform?

f (x , y) = ℛ−1{g(ℓ, �)}

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 178 / 412

Page 179: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Radon Transform

SinogramCT data acquired for collection of ℓ and �

CT scanners acquires a sinogram

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 179 / 412

Page 180: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Reconstruction

BackprojectionGoal: find f (x , y) from g(ℓ, �)Strategy: “smear” g(ℓ, �) into planeFormally:

b�(x , y) = g(x cos � + y sin �, �)

b�(x , y) is a laminar image

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 180 / 412

Page 181: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Reconstruction

Backprojection Summation“Add up” all the backprojection images:

fb(x , y) =

∫ �

0

b�(x , y)d�

=

∫ �

0

g(x cos � + y sin �, �)d�

=

∫ �

0

[g(ℓ, �)]ℓ=x cos �+y sin � d�

fb(x , y) is called a laminogram orbackprojection summation image

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 181 / 412

Page 182: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Reconstruction

Properties of Laminogram“Bright spots” tend to reinforce

Problem:fb(x , y) ∕= f (x , y)

What is wrong?

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 182 / 412

Page 183: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Reconstruction

Convolution BackprojectionCorrect reconstruction formula:

f (x , y) =

∫ �

0

[c(ℓ) ∗ g(ℓ, �)]ℓ=x cos �+y sin � d�

wherec(ℓ) = ℱ−1{∣%∣}

is called the ramp filter.

Three steps: ← know/understand these!!▶ 1. convolution▶ 2. backprojection▶ 3. summation

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 183 / 412

Page 184: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Reconstruction

Step 1: ConvolutionConvolve every projection with c(ℓ)

the horizontal direction in a sinogram

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 184 / 412

Page 185: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Reconstruction

Step 2: Backprojection1D projection → 2D laminar function

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 185 / 412

Page 186: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Reconstruction

Step 3: SummationAccumulate sum of backprojection images

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 186 / 412

Page 187: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Projection-Slice Theorem

Projection-Slice TheoremRadon transform:

g(ℓ, �) = ℛ{f (x , y)}

Fourier transforms:

G (%, �) = ℱ1D {g(ℓ, �)}F (u, v) = ℱ2D {f (x , y)}

Projection-slice theorem:

G (%, �) = F (% cos �, % sin �)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 187 / 412

Page 188: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Projection-Slice Theorem

Illustration of Projection-Slice Theorem

x

y

u

v

ρ

l

θ

θ

f(x,y) F(u,v)

2D Fourier Transform

1D Fourier Transform

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 188 / 412

Page 189: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Projection-Slice Theorem

Exact Reconstruction FormulasFourier reconstruction:

f (x , y) = ℱ−1

2D {G (%, �)}

Filtered backprojection:

f (x , y) =

∫ �

0

[∫ ∞−∞∣%∣G (%, �)e+j2�%ℓd%

]ℓ=x cos �+y sin �

d�

Convolution backprojection:

f (x , y) =

∫ �

0

∫ ∞−∞

g(ℓ, �)c(x cos � + y sin � − ℓ)dℓd�

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 189 / 412

Page 190: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Projection-Slice Theorem

Ramp Filter Design∣%∣ is not integrable

⇒ c(ℓ) does not exist

Actual ramp filter is designed as

c(ℓ) = ℱ−1

1D{W (%)∣%∣}

Simplest window function is

W (%) = rect

(%

2%0

)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 190 / 412

Page 191: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Resolution

Factors Affecting CT ResolutionDetector width ∼ area detectors

detector indicator function = s(ℓ)

Window function W (%)Approximate CBP:

f (x , y) =∫ �

0

[∫ ∞−∞

G (%, �)S(%)W (%)∣%∣e j2�%ℓ d%]ℓ=x cos �+y sin �

d�

whereS(%) = ℱ{s(ℓ)}

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 191 / 412

Page 192: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Resolution

Blurry ReconstructionBlurry projection:

g(ℓ, �) = g(ℓ, �) ∗ s(ℓ) ∗ w(ℓ)

= g(ℓ, �) ∗ h(ℓ)

Radon transform convolution theorem

ℛ{f ∗2 h} = ℛ{f } ∗1 ℛ{h}

Leads to

f (x , y) = f (x , y) ∗ ℛ−1{h(ℓ)}

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 192 / 412

Page 193: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Resolution

Circular Symmetry of BlurringCT image blurred by convolution kernel

h(x , y) = ℛ−1{h(ℓ)}

Fourier transform of h(ℓ)

H(%) = ℱ1{h(ℓ)} = S(%)W (%)

which is independent of �.

Therefore, H(u, v) is circularly symmetric

H(q) = ℱ2{h(x , y)} = S(q)W (q)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 193 / 412

Page 194: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Resolution

PSF Given by Hankel TransformPSF is circularly symmetric and given by

h(r) = ℋ−1{S(%)W (%)}

Reconstructed image given by

f (x , y) = f (x , y) ∗ h(r)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 194 / 412

Page 195: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Noise

Noise in CT MeasurementsBasic measurement is:

gij = − ln

(Nij

N0

)

▶ line Lij▶ angle i▶ position j

Noise is “in” Poisson random variable Nij

▶ mean Nij

▶ variance Nij

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 195 / 412

Page 196: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Noise

Functions of Random VariablesIt follows that gij is a random variable

gij ≈ ln

(N0

Nij

)Var(gij) ≈

1

Nij

�(x , y) is approximate reconstruction

It follows that �(x , y) is a random variable

What are the mean and variance of �?

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 196 / 412

Page 197: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Noise

CBP ApproximationConvolution backprojection (CBP):

�(x , y) =

∫ �

0

∫ ∞−∞

g(ℓ, �)c(x cos � + y sin � − ℓ)dℓd�

Approximations:▶ M angles; Δ� = �/M▶ N + 1 detectors; Δℓ = T▶ c(ℓ) ≈ c(ℓ)

Discrete CBP:

�(x , y) =( �M

) M∑j=1

T

N/2∑i=−N/2

g(iT , j�/M)c(x cos �j+y sin �j−iT )

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 197 / 412

Page 198: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Noise

More Definitions and ApproximationsNij is mean for i-th detector and j-th angle

Nij is independent for different measurements

Nij = N , an “object uniformity” assumption

c(ℓ) is created using rectangular window W (%) withcutoff %0.

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 198 / 412

Page 199: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Noise

ConclusionsMean(�) is desired result

Var(�) = �2� is inaccuracy

�2� ≈

2�2

3%3

0

1

M

1

N/T

Be cautious on conclusions: not all variables areindependent in a real physical system

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 199 / 412

Page 200: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Noise

Signal-to-noise RatioDefinition (usual)

SNR =C �

��

After substitution:

SNR =C �

√3M

2%30

N

T

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 200 / 412

Page 201: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Noise

SNR in a Good DesignWhat should %0 be?

Let dectector width = w

%0 should be anti-aliasing filter:

%0 =k

wwhere k ≈ 1

In 3G scanner w = T

ThenSNR ≈ 0.4kC �w

√NM

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 201 / 412

Page 202: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Noise

SNR in Fan-Beam CaseDefinitions:

▶ Nf is mean photon count per fan▶ D is number of detectors▶ L is length of detector array

Then

SNR ≈ 0.4kC �L

√NfM

D3

Strange: In 3G, increasing D decreases SNR.

Reason: This analysis ignores resolution

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 202 / 412

Page 203: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Noise

Rule of ThumbVariables:

▶ D is number of detectors▶ M is number of angles▶ J2 is number of pixels in image

Very approximate “rule”:

D ≈ M ≈ J

Typical numbers:

Lo: D ≈ 700 M ≈ 1, 000 J ≈ 512

Hi: D ≈ 900 M ≈ 1, 600 J ≈ 1, 024

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 203 / 412

Page 204: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Fan Beam Reconstruction

Fan Beam Geometry

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 204 / 412

Page 205: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Fan Beam Reconstruction

Sinogram Rebinning

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 205 / 412

Page 206: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Fan Beam Reconstruction

Fan-Beam Variables

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 206 / 412

Page 207: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Computed Tomography Fan Beam Reconstruction

Fan-Beam Convolution BackprojectionFormula

f (x , y) =

∫ 2�

0

1

(D ′)2

∫ m

− mp( , �)c ′( ′ − )d d�

D ′ depends on (x , y)

c ′ is a different filter than c

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 207 / 412

Page 208: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine

7 Physics of Nuclear MedicineBinding EnergyRadioactivityRadiotracers

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 208 / 412

Page 209: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Binding Energy

NomenclatureAtomic number: Z , number of protons in nucleus

Mass number: A, number of nucleons in nucleus

Nuclide: unique combination of protons andneutrons in nucleus

Radionuclide: a nuclide that is radioactive

Isotope: atoms with same Z , different A

Isobar: atoms with same A, different Z

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 209 / 412

Page 210: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Binding Energy

Mass Defect and Binding EnergyMass defect =

Mass of constituents of atom

− actual mass of atom

unified mass unit, u, = 1/12 mass of C-12 atom

Binding energy = mass defect ×c2

One u is equivalent to 931 MeV

Generally, more massive atom, more binding energy

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 210 / 412

Page 211: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Binding Energy

Binding Energy per Nucleon

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 211 / 412

Page 212: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Radioactivity

What is Radioactivity?Radioactive decay: rearrangement of nucleii tolower energy states = greater mass defect

Parent atom decays to daughter atom

Daughter has higher binding energy/nucleon thanparent

A radioatom is said to decay when its nucleus isrearranged

A disintegration is a radioatom undergoingradioactive decay.

Energy is released with disintegration.

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 212 / 412

Page 213: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Radioactivity

“Line” of StabilityNuclides divide into two groups:

▶ Non-radioactive — i.e., stable atoms▶ Radioactive — i.e., unstable atoms

“Line” of stability:

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 213 / 412

Page 214: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Radioactivity

Decay ModesFour main modes of decay:

▶ alpha particles (2 protons, 2 neutrons)▶ beta particles (electrons)▶ positrons (anti-matter electrons)▶ isomeric transition (gamma rays produced)

Medical imaging is only concerned with:▶ positrons (PET), and▶ gamma rays (scintigraphy, SPECT)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 214 / 412

Page 215: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Radioactivity

Measurement of RadioactivityRadioactivity, A, # disintegrations per second

1 Bq = 1 dps

1 Ci = 3.7× 1010 Bq

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 215 / 412

Page 216: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Radioactivity

Radioactive Decay LawTime evolution of radioactivity:

At = A0e−�t

� is the decay constant

Half-life t1/2 is defined by

At1/2

A0=

1

2= e−�t1/2

It follows that

t1/2 =0.693

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 216 / 412

Page 217: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Radioactivity

Statistics of DecayOver “short” time Δt relative to t1/2:

# radioatoms N0 approximately constant

Statistics are Poisson:

P[ΔN = k] =(�N0Δt)ke−�N0Δt

k!

Interpretation: �N0Δt is probability of having onedisintegration from N0 radioatoms in time intervalΔt

�N0 is called Poisson rate, units aredisintegrations per second, it is activity

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 217 / 412

Page 218: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Radiotracers

RadiotracersRadionuclides in the body must be safe

By themselves:▶ Iodine-123,▶ Iodine-131

Labeled: Chemically attached to natural substances:

▶ Technetium-99m labeled DTPA,▶ Oxygen-15 labeled O2,▶ Fluorine-18 labeled glucose

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 218 / 412

Page 219: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Radiotracers

Radiotracer PropertiesEmit gamma rays or positrons

Half life: minutes to a few hours

Positron emission:

▶ positrons annihilate▶ produces two 511 keV gamma rays,▶ gamma rays are 180-degrees apart

Gamma ray emission:

▶ monoenergetic gamma rays (desirable)▶ high energy gamma rays (desirable)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 219 / 412

Page 220: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Nuclear Medicine Radiotracers

Some RadiotracersGamma Ray Emitters:

▶ Iodine-123 (13.3 h, 159 keV)▶ Iodine-131 (8.04 d, 364 keV)▶ Iodine-125 (60 d, 35 keV) (Bad. Why?)▶ Thallium-201 (73 h, 135 keV)▶ Technetium-99m (6 h, 140 keV)

Positron Emitters:▶ Fluorine-18 (110 min, 202 keV)▶ Oxygen-15 (2 min, 696 keV)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 220 / 412

Page 221: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy

8 Planar ScintigraphyScintigraphy SystemsGamma CameraAcquisition ModesImage EquationResolution and SensitivityArtifacts and Noise

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 221 / 412

Page 222: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Scintigraphy Systems

Broad PurposeGamma emitter in body; where is it?

Planar camera; like radiography

2D projection of 3D concentration

X-ray Image Bone Scintigram

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 222 / 412

Page 223: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Scintigraphy Systems

A SPECT/Scintigraphy/CT System

http://www.gehealthcare.com

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 223 / 412

Page 224: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Scintigraphy Systems

Example PreparationGallium-67 citrate

half-life is 78 hr

93 keV (40%), 184 keV (24%), 296 keV (22%), and388 keV (7%).

150-220 MBq (4-6 mCi) intravenously

48 hr after injection, about 75% remains in body

equally distributed among the liver, bone and bonemarrow, and soft tissues.

Scintigrams 24–72 hrs after injection

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 224 / 412

Page 225: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Scintigraphy Systems

Whole Body Image

http://www.gehealthcare.com

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 225 / 412

Page 226: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Gamma Camera

Gamma/Anger Camera Components

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 226 / 412

Page 227: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Gamma Camera

Collimators

(a) (b)

(c)(d)

(a) Parallel hole

(b) Converging hole (magnifies)

(a) Diverging hole (minifies)

(a) Pin-hole (2–5 mm)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 227 / 412

Page 228: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Gamma Camera

DetectorSingle large-area NaI(Tl) crystal

Diameters:▶ 30–50 cm in diameter▶ Mobile units: 30 cm▶ Fixed scanners: 50 cm

Thickness:▶ High-E emitters: 1.25 cm thick▶ Low-E emitters: 6–8 mm thick

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 228 / 412

Page 229: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Gamma Camera

Photomultiplier Tube Array

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 229 / 412

Page 230: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Gamma Camera

Photomultiplier Tube

Dynodes

Focussing

Grid

Photocathode

Light Photons

1,200 V

Output Signal

Anode

e-

e-

e-

e-

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 230 / 412

Page 231: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Gamma Camera

Pulse HeightResponse to single gamma ray photon

PMT responses, ak , k = 1, . . . ,K

Total response of cammera is Z -pulse

Z =K∑

k=1

ak

Height of Z pulse is important▶ Can remove Compton photons▶ Can reject multiple hits

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 231 / 412

Page 232: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Gamma Camera

Pulse Height Analysis

Discriminator circuit rejectsnon-photopeak events

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 232 / 412

Page 233: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Gamma Camera

Event Positioning LogicTube centers at (xk , yk) k = 1, . . . ,K

Center of mass of pulse responses is

X =1

Z

K∑k=1

xkak

Y =1

Z

K∑k=1

ykak

This is pulse location

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 233 / 412

Page 234: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Acquisition Modes

Acquisition ModesHow to use the camera to make images?

▶ List mode▶ Static frame mode▶ Dynamic frame mode▶ Multiple-gated acquisition▶ Whole body mode

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 234 / 412

Page 235: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Acquisition Modes

List Mode

Complete information, but memory hog

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 235 / 412

Page 236: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Acquisition Modes

Static Frame Mode

Matrix sizes: 64 × 64, 128 × 128, 256 × 256

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 236 / 412

Page 237: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Acquisition Modes

Dynamic Frame Mode

Useful for imaging transient physiological processes

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 237 / 412

Page 238: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Acquisition Modes

Multiple Gated Acquisition

Cardiac (ECG) gated. Data resorted using ECG

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 238 / 412

Page 239: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Acquisition Modes

Whole Body Mode

Common in bone scans and tumor screening

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 239 / 412

Page 240: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Image Equation

Imaging Geometry and Assumptions

Lines defined by (parallel) collimator holesIgnore Compton scatteringRadioactivity is A(x , y , z)Monoenergetic photons, energy E

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 240 / 412

Page 241: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Image Equation

Imaging EquationPhoton fluence on detector is

�(x , y) =∫ 0

−∞

A(x , y , z)

4�z2e−∫ 0

z

�(x , y , z ′;E )dz ′

dz

Depth-dependent effects from:▶ inverse square law, and▶ object-dependent attenuation

Consequences:▶ Near activity brighter▶ Front and back are different

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 241 / 412

Page 242: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Image Equation

Planar SourcesAz0

(x , y) has radioactivity on z = z0

A(x , y , z) = Az0(x , y)�(z − z0)

Detected photon fluence rate

�(x , y) = Az0(x , y)

1

4�z20

exp

{−∫ 0

z0

�(x , y , z ′;E )dz ′}

Two terms attenuate desired result▶ inverse square law: constant for (x , y)▶ �: not constant for (x , y)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 242 / 412

Page 243: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Resolution and Sensitivity

Collimator Resolution

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 243 / 412

Page 244: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Resolution and Sensitivity

Collimator ResolutionCollimator Resolution = FWHM =

RC (∣z ∣) =d

l(l + b + ∣z ∣)

Gaussian approximation

hc(x , y ; ∣z ∣) = exp{−4(x2 + y 2) ln 2/R2

C (∣z ∣)}

Planar source is blurred

�(x , y) = Az0(x , y)

1

4�z20

×

exp

{−∫ 0

z0

�(x , y , z ′;E )dz ′}∗ hc(x , y ; ∣z0∣)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 244 / 412

Page 245: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Resolution and Sensitivity

Instrinsic ResolutionWhere did the x-ray photon hit?

▶ Compton in crystal spreads out light▶ Crystal thickness▶ Noise in light, PMTs, and electronics

Gaussian approximation

hI (x , y) = exp{−4(x2 + y 2) ln 2/R2

I

}Planar source is further blurred

�(x , y) = Az0(x , y)

1

4�z20

exp

{−∫ 0

z0

�(x , y , z ′;E )dz ′}

∗hC (x , y ; ∣z0∣) ∗ hI (x , y)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 245 / 412

Page 246: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Resolution and Sensitivity

Collimator SensitivityCollimator Efficiency = Sensistivity =

� =

(Kd2

l(d + h)

)2

where K ≈ 0.25.

� is the fraction of photons (on average) that passthrough the collimator for each emitted photondirected at the camera

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 246 / 412

Page 247: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Resolution and Sensitivity

Resolution vs. Sensitivity

Table: Resolution and Sensitivity for Several Collimators

collimator d (mm) l (mm) h (mm) resolution relative@ 10 cm (mm) sensitivity

LEUHR 1.5 38 0.20 5.4 12.1LEHR 1.9 38 0.20 6.9 20.5LEAP 1.9 32 0.20 7.8 28.9LEHS 2.3 32 0.20 9.5 43.7

LEUHR = low energy ultra-high resolutionLEHR = low energy high resolutionLEAP = low energy all purposeLEHS = low energy high sensitivity

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 247 / 412

Page 248: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Resolution and Sensitivity

Detector EfficiencyDepends on crystal thickness

▶ thicker ⇒ more efficient▶ 100% at 100keV; 10-20% at 511keV

Tradeoff:▶ If E low ⇒ use thinner crystal

★ better intrinsic resolution▶ If E high ⇒ use thicker crystal

★ poorer intrinsic resolution

▶ Higher E , less abosorption in body

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 248 / 412

Page 249: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Artifacts and Noise

Geometry and NonuniformityGeometric distortion

▶ pincushion distortion▶ barrel distortion▶ wavy line distortion

Image nonuniformity▶ variation as much as 10%▶ non-uniform detector efficiencies▶ geometric distortions → “hot spot”▶ edge packing

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 249 / 412

Page 250: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Artifacts and Noise

Image SNRSuppose N photons are detected

Then intrinsic SNR of frame mode is

SNR(intrinsic) =

√N

J

J2 is number of pixels in image

For similar areas of target and background:

SNR = C√Nb

Just like in projection radiography

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 250 / 412

Page 251: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Artifacts and Noise

Energy ResolutionEnergy resolution = FWHM of photopeak

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 251 / 412

Page 252: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Planar Scintigraphy Artifacts and Noise

Pulse PileupPulse pileup = two simultaneous -rays

Event rejected▶ because of energy discrimination▶ wasted photons

Cannot improve image using larger dose

Instead, keep dose low and image longer

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 252 / 412

Page 253: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography

9 Emission TomographyOverviewSPECT System ComponentsSPECT Imaging EquationSPECT ReconstructionPrinciple of PETPET System ComponentsPET Imaging EquationPET ReconstructionResolution and Artifacts

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 253 / 412

Page 254: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography Overview

OverviewSPECT

▶ uses gamma ray emitters▶ uses Anger camera▶ 3-D volume reconstruction

PET▶ uses positron emitters▶ requires coincidence detectors▶ multiple 2-D slices

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 254 / 412

Page 255: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography SPECT System Components

SPECT HardwareRotating gamma camera

Each “row” is separate slice

Multiple heads (2 or 3) are common

High-performance cameras used▶ < 1% nonuniformity required▶ need good mechanical alignment

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 255 / 412

Page 256: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography SPECT System Components

Typical SPECT System

http://www.gehealthcare.com

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 256 / 412

Page 257: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography SPECT System Components

Multiple Head Tradeoffs

Table: Comparison of acquisition times and relative sensitivities forsingle- and multi-head systems with identical camera heads andcollimation.

360∘ 180∘

Acq Time Rel Sens Acq Time Rel Sens

Single 30 1 30 1Double (heads@180∘) 15 2 30 1Double (heads@90∘) 15 2 15 2Triple 10 3 20 1.5

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 257 / 412

Page 258: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography SPECT Imaging Equation

SPECT Coordinate System

“Home position:” x → z , y → ℓ, z → y

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 258 / 412

Page 259: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography SPECT Imaging Equation

Basic Imaging EquationParallel hole collimators

Camera fixed distance R from origin(origin in patient)

Imaging equation in “home” position:

�(z , ℓ) =

∫ R

−∞

A(x , y , z)

4�(y − R)2

exp

{−∫ R

y

�(x , y ′, z ;E )dy ′}dy

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 259 / 412

Page 260: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography SPECT Imaging Equation

Tomographic Imaging Geometry

z is irrelevant

Line described by

L(ℓ, �) = {(x , y)∣ x cos � + y sin � = ℓ}

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 260 / 412

Page 261: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography SPECT Imaging Equation

Tomographic Imaging Equation

�(ℓ, �) =

∫ R

−∞

A(x(s), y(s))

4�(s − R)2

exp

{−∫ R

s

�(x(s ′), y(s ′);E )ds ′}ds

Two unknowns: A(x , y) and �(x , y)

Generally intractable ⇒▶ ignore attenuation (often done)▶ assume constant▶ measure and apply atten correction

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 261 / 412

Page 262: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography SPECT Imaging Equation

Approximate SPECT Imaging EquationBold approximations: ignore attenuation, inversesquare law, and scale factors:

�(ℓ, �) =

∫ ∞−∞

A(x(s), y(s))ds

Using line impulse:

�(ℓ, �) =∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

A(x , y)�(x cos � + y sin � − ℓ) dx dy

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 262 / 412

Page 263: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography SPECT Reconstruction

SPECT ReconstructionRecognize:

f (x , y) = A(x , y)

g(ℓ, �) = �(ℓ, �)

Use convolution backprojection

A(x , y) =∫ �

0

∫ ∞−∞

�(ℓ, �)c(x cos � + y sin � − ℓ) dℓ d�

Approximate ramp filter:

c(ℓ) = ℱ−11D {∣%∣W (%)}

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 263 / 412

Page 264: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography Principle of PET

PET PrinciplesPositron emitters

Positron annihilation:▶ short distance from emission▶ produces two 511 keV gamma rays▶ gamma rays 180∘ opposite directions

Principle: detect coincident gamma rays

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 264 / 412

Page 265: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography Principle of PET

A PET Scanner

Used with permission of GE Healthcare

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 265 / 412

Page 266: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography Principle of PET

Positron Annihilation

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 266 / 412

Page 267: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography Principle of PET

Annihilation Coincidence Detection (ACD)Event occurs if detections are coincident

Time window is typically 2–20 ns

12 ns is common setting

No detector collimation required

Dual-head SPECT systems can be used

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 267 / 412

Page 268: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography PET System Components

PET Detector Block

Crystals plus PMTs

BGO = Bismuth Germanate

BGO has 3x stopping power than NaI(Tl)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 268 / 412

Page 269: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography PET System Components

Typical PET Detector Arrangement2 mm × 2 mm elements

8 by 8 elements per blocks; 2 by 2 PMTs per block

48 blocks per major ring; 3 major rings

⇒ 24 detector rings; 384 detectors per ring

⇒ 8216 crystals total

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 269 / 412

Page 270: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography PET System Components

2-D or 3-D PET GeometrySepta or no septa between rings?

Septa: ⇒ multiple 2-D PET rings▶ Reconstruction like 2-D CT

No septa: ⇒ 3-D PET▶ Need 3-D reconstruction algorithms

We focus on 2-D PET

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 270 / 412

Page 271: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography PET Imaging Equation

2-D PET Geometry

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 271 / 412

Page 272: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography PET Imaging Equation

Lines of Response (LORs)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 272 / 412

Page 273: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography PET Imaging Equation

Imaging EquationLine integrals of activity

On line L(ℓ, �)

�(ℓ, �) = K exp

{−∫ R

−R�(x(s), y(s);E ) ds

}×∫ R

−RA(x(s), y(s)) ds

Unknowns �(x , y) and A(x , y) separate

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 273 / 412

Page 274: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography PET Imaging Equation

Attenuation CorrectionCorrected sinogram

�c(ℓ, �) =�(ℓ, �)

K exp{−∫ R

−R �(x(s), y(s);E ) ds}

�(x , y) found from CT (transmission PET)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 274 / 412

Page 275: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography PET Reconstruction

PET ReconstructionConvolution backprojection yields A(x , y)

Ac(x , y) =∫ �

0

∫ ∞−∞

�c(ℓ, �)c(x cos � + y sin � − ℓ) dℓd�

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 275 / 412

Page 276: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography Resolution and Artifacts

Resolution in Emission TomographyApproximation:

f (x , y) = f (x , y) ∗ h(r)

In SPECT, h(r) includes:▶ collimator and intrinsic resolutions▶ ramp filter window effect

In PET, h(r) includes:▶ the positron range function▶ detector width effects▶ ramp filter window effect

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 276 / 412

Page 277: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography Resolution and Artifacts

PET Events

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 277 / 412

Page 278: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Emission Tomography Resolution and Artifacts

Coincidence TimingThree classes of events

▶ true coincidence▶ scattered coincidence▶ random coincidence

Sensitivity in PET▶ measures capability of system to detect

“trues” and reject “randoms”

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 278 / 412

Page 279: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics

10 Ultrasound PhysicsAn Ultrasound SystemWave EquationsWave PropagationField Patterns

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 279 / 412

Page 280: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics An Ultrasound System

Ultrasound Image

http://www.gehealthcare.com http://www.gehealthcare.com

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 280 / 412

Page 281: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Equations

UltrasoundUltrasound is sound with f > 20 kHz

Medical ultrasound imaging uses f > 1 MHz

Same physics = physics of longitudinal waves▶ Wave equations▶ Snell’s laws (reflection and refraction)▶ Attenuation and absorption▶ The Doppler effect▶ Vibrating plates and field patterns▶ Scattering

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 281 / 412

Page 282: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Equations

3-D Wave EquationAcoustic pressure: p(x , y , z , t)

3-D wave equation

∇2p(x , y , z , t) =1

c2ptt(x , y , z , t)

where∇2p = pxx + pyy + pzz

and c is the speed of sound

General solution is very complicated

We go after plane waves and spherical waves

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 282 / 412

Page 283: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Equations

Plane WavesPlane wave in z direction:

p(z , t) = p(x , y , z , t)

Plane wave equation:

pzz(z , t) =1

c2ptt(z , t)

General solution:

p(z , t) = �f (t − c−1z) + �b(t + c−1z)

where �f (t) and �b(t) are arbitrary

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 283 / 412

Page 284: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Equations

Harmonic Waves“Harmonic” plane wave

p(z , t) = cos[k(z − ct)]

Definitions:▶ wavenumber: k▶ frequency: f = kc/2�▶ period: T = 1/f▶ wavelength: � = c/f

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 284 / 412

Page 285: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Equations

Spherical Waves3-D spherical wave:

p(r , t) = p(x , y , z , t)

where r =√x2 + y 2 + z2.

Spherical wave equation:

1

r

∂2

∂r 2(rp) =

1

c2

∂2p

∂t2

General solution (outward expanding):

p(r , t) =1

r�o(t − c−1r)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 285 / 412

Page 286: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Propagation

Characteristic ImpedanceCharacteristic impedance

Z = �c

where � is density

Why impedance?p = Zv

where v is particle velocity v ∕= c

▶ p is “like” voltage▶ v is “like” current

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 286 / 412

Page 287: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Propagation

Acoustic EnergyKinetic energy density:

wk =1

2�0v

2

Potential energy density:

wp =1

2�p2

where � is compressibility.

Acoustic energy density:

w = wk + wp

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 287 / 412

Page 288: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Propagation

Acoustic PowerAcoustic Intensity:

I = pv =p2

Z

(like electrical power p = vi)

Propagation of acoustic power (plane wave):

∂I

∂z+∂w

∂t= 0

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 288 / 412

Page 289: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Propagation

Reflection and Refraction

Snell’s Laws:

�r = �isin �isin �t

=c1

c2

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 289 / 412

Page 290: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Propagation

Reflected and Refracted WavesPressure reflectivity:

R =prpi

=Z2 cos �i − Z1 cos �tZ2 cos �i + Z1 cos �t

Pressure transmittivity:

T =ptpi

=2Z2 cos �i

Z2 cos �i + Z1 cos �t

At normal incidence:

R =Z2 − Z1

Z2 + Z1

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 290 / 412

Page 291: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Propagation

Attenuation and AbsorptionPhenomenological model:

p(z , t) = A0e−�az f (t − c−1z)

�a is amplitude attenuation factor [cm−1]

Absorption coefficient:

� = 20(log10 e)�a [dB/cm]

In range 1 MHz ≤ f ≤ 10 MHz

� ≈ af and a ≈ 1 dB/cm-MHz

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 291 / 412

Page 292: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Wave Propagation

ScatteringParticle at (0, 0, d), reflection coefficient R

Generates spherical wave

ps(r , t) =Re−�arA0e

−�ad

rf (t − c−1d − c−1r)

r is distance from (0, 0, d)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 292 / 412

Page 293: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Field Patterns

Field PatternsGeometric approximation

Diffraction formulation (book)

Simple model:

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 293 / 412

Page 294: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Field Patterns

Far Field = Fraunhofer PatternTransducer face indicator function:

s(x , y) =

{1 (x , y) in face0 otherwise

Far field pattern:

q(x , y , z) ≈ 1

ze jk(x2+y2)/2zS

( x

�z,y

�z

)S(u, v) is Fourier transform of s(x , y).

Pulse-echo sensitivity: q2(x , y , z).

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 294 / 412

Page 295: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Physics Field Patterns

FocusingFocal length field pattern:

q(x , y , d) ≈ 1

de jk(x2+y2)/2dS

( x

�d,y

�d

)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 295 / 412

Page 296: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging

11 Ultrasound ImagingUltrasound System ComponentsTransducersDisplay ModesEffects of AbsorptionPhased ArraysImaging EquationResolutionSpeckle

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 296 / 412

Page 297: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Ultrasound System Components

Block Diagram

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 297 / 412

Page 298: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Transducers

Transducerslead zirconate titantate (PZT)

▶ piezoelectric crystal▶ good transmit and receive efficiencies▶ different shapes:

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 298 / 412

Page 299: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Transducers

Piezoelectric Effect

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 299 / 412

Page 300: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Transducers

ResonanceShock excite yields resonant pulse

Resonant frequency:

fT =cT

2dT

Damps out after 3–5 cycles

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 300 / 412

Page 301: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Transducers

Typical Transmit Pulse

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 301 / 412

Page 302: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Transducers

Ultrasound Probe

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 302 / 412

Page 303: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Transducers

Mechanical Scanners

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 303 / 412

Page 304: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Transducers

Electronic Scanner

Linear arrays:▶ 64–256 elements, fire in groups▶ each element ≈ 2 mm by 10 mm

Phased arrays:▶ 30–128 elements; electronically steered▶ each element ≈ 0.2 mm by 8 mm

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 304 / 412

Page 305: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Display Modes

A-mode Display

The Range Equation

z =ct

2

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 305 / 412

Page 306: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Display Modes

M-mode Display

http://www.gehealthcare.com

fast time vs. slow timeJerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 306 / 412

Page 307: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Display Modes

B-mode Display

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 307 / 412

Page 308: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Effects of Absorption

Depth of PenetrationSignal is “lost” from absorption

Total travel before “lost” is

d =L

where L is system sensitivity in dB

depth of penetration is

dp =d

2=

L

2�≈ L

2af

Rule-of-thumb: dp ≈ 40/f (MHz) cm

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 308 / 412

Page 309: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Effects of Absorption

Pulse RepetitionSignal “dies”; then repeat

Pulse repetition interval:

TR ≥2dpc≈ L

afc

Pulse repetition frequency/rate:

fR =1

TR

@2 MHz, fR ≤ 3,850 Hz.

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 309 / 412

Page 310: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Effects of Absorption

Image Frame RateN scan lines to make image

Image frame rate:

fF ≤fRN

How to increase frame rate?▶ restrict field-of-view▶ increase frequency (why?)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 310 / 412

Page 311: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Phased Arrays

Phased Arrays: Transmit Steering

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 311 / 412

Page 312: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Phased Arrays

Phased Arrays: Transmit Focussing

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 312 / 412

Page 313: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Phased Arrays

Delays for Transmit FocussingFocal point at (xf , zf )

Ti is at (id , 0).

Then range from Ti to focal point is:

ri =√

(id − xf )2 + z2f

Assume T0 fires at t = 0. Then Ti fires at

ti =r0 − ri

c

=

√x2f + z2

f −√

(id − xf )2 + z2f

c

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 313 / 412

Page 314: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Phased Arrays

Phased Arrays: Receive Beamforming

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 314 / 412

Page 315: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Phased Arrays

Phased Arrays: Receive DynamicFocussing

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 315 / 412

Page 316: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Phased Arrays

Dynamic Focussing Time DelaysT0 fired at t = 0 (focussed or steered)

spherical wave originates at (x , z)

Distance from (x , z) to Ti is

ri =√

(id − x)2 + z2

Dynamic time delays are (requires derivation)

�i(t) = t −√

(id)2 + (ct)2 − 2ctid sin �

c+

Nd

c

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 316 / 412

Page 317: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Complex SignalComplex signal:

n(t) = ne(t)e j�e−j2�f0t

Complex envelope is n(t) = ne(t)e j�

The pulse isn(t) = Re{n(t)}

The envelope is

ne(t) = ∣n(t)∣

(This will form the A-mode signal.)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 317 / 412

Page 318: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Complex Pressure in SpaceAcoustic dipole (complex) pressure

p(x , y , z ; t) =1

r0

z

r0n(t − c−1r0)

Superposition over transducer face

p(x , y , z ; t) =

∫ ∫s(x0, y0)

z

r 20

n(t − c−1r0)dx0dy0

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 318 / 412

Page 319: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Echo from Point ScattererPoint scatterer with reflectivity R(x , y , z)

Pressure at (x ′0, y′0) on face

ps(x′0, y′0; t) = R(x , y , z)

1

r ′0p(x , y , z ; t − c−1r ′0)

Integrated dipole response (voltage)

r(x , y , z ; t) =

K

∫ ∫s(x ′0, y

′0)z

r ′0ps(x

′0, y′0; t)dx ′0dy

′0

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 319 / 412

Page 320: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Total Response from Point Scatterer

r(x , y , z ; t) = KR(x , y , z)

⋅∫ ∫

dx ′0dy′0 s(x ′0, y

′0)

z

r ′20

⋅∫ ∫

dx0dy0 s(x0, y0)z

r 20

⋅ n(t − c−1r0 − c−1r ′0)

Now apply a series of approximations:▶ plane wave, paraxial▶ Fresnel, Fraunhofer

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 320 / 412

Page 321: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Plane Wave ApproximationExcitation pulse envelope arrives at all points at agiven range simultaneously.

Mathematically,

n(t − c−1r0 − c−1r ′0) ≈n(t − 2c−1z)e jk(r0−z)e jk(r ′0−z)

where wavenumber is

k = 2�f0c−1

and range equation gives

ct = 2z

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 321 / 412

Page 322: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Received Signal with Field PatternDefine field pattern as

q(x , y , z) =

∫ ∫s(x0, y0)

z

r 20

e jk(r0−z)dx0dy0

Then received signal (from single scatterer) is

r(x , y , z ; t) =

KR(x , y , z)n(t − 2c−1z)[q(x , y , z)]2

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 322 / 412

Page 323: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Basic Pulse-echo Imaging EquationSpatial distribution of scatterers

Assume superposition holds

Include attenuation

Total response is

r(t) = K

∫ ∫ ∫R(x , y , z)

n(t − 2c−1z)e−2�az [q(x , y , z)]2dxdydz

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 323 / 412

Page 324: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Paraxial ApproximationPattern is large near the transducer axis

Then r0 ≈ z

Field pattern becomes

q(x , y , z) ≈ 1

z

∫ ∫s(x0, y0)e jk(r0−z)dx0dy0

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 324 / 412

Page 325: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Fresnel and Fraunhofer ApproximationsBoth involve phase approximations

Fresnel field pattern

q(x , y , z) ≈ 1

zs(x , y) ∗ e jk(x2+y2)/2z

Fraunhofer field pattern

q(x , y , z) ≈ 1

ze jk(x2+y2)/2zS

( x

�z,y

�z

)for z ≥ D2/�.

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 325 / 412

Page 326: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

General Pulse-echo EquationDefine

q(x , y , z) = zq(x , y , z)

Fresnel or Fraunhofer satisfies

r(t) = Ke−�act

(ct)2∫ ∫ ∫R(x , y , z)n(t − 2c−1z)q2(x , y , z)dxdydz

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 326 / 412

Page 327: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Time-gain CompensationAmplitude of r decays predictably

Compensate with time-varying gain

rc(t) = g(t)r(t) =∫ ∫ ∫R(x , y , z)n(t − 2c−1z)q2(x , y , z)dxdydz

g(t) =(ct)2e�act

K

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 327 / 412

Page 328: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Envelope Detection: A-modeComplex signal model n(t) throughout

Linear system model (superposition)

Therefore, gain-compensated A-mode signal is

ec(t) =

∣∣∣∣∫ ∫ ∫ R(x , y , z)

n(t − 2c−1z)q2(x , y , z)dxdydz∣∣

=

∣∣∣∣∫ ∫ ∫ R(x , y , z)

ne(t − 2c−1z)e j2kz q2(x , y , z)dxdydz∣∣

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 328 / 412

Page 329: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Imaging Equation

Transducer Motion and Range EquationMove transducer to (x0, y0); yields ec(t; x0, y0).

Use range equation as z0 = ct/2.

Then ec(⋅) estimates reflectivity

R(x0, y0, z0) = ec(2z0/c ; x0, y0)

=

∣∣∣∣∫ ∫ ∫ R(x , y , z)e j2kzne(2(z0 − z)/c)

⋅ q2(x − x0, y − y0, z)dxdydz∣∣

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 329 / 412

Page 330: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Resolution

Resolution CellWhere is the acoustic energy in space?

resolution cell(x , y , z ; x0, y0, z0) =

∣ne(2(z0 − z)/c)q2(x − x0, y − y0, z)∣

For geometric approximation

resolution cell(x , y , z ; x0, y0, z0) =

ne(2(z0 − z)/c)s(x − x0, y − y0)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 330 / 412

Page 331: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Ultrasound Imaging Speckle

Origin of SpeckleUnder geometric assumption

R(x , y , z) =

K

∣∣∣∣R(x , y , z)e j2kz ∗ s(x , y)ne

(z

c/2

)∣∣∣∣Term e j2kz is “fast-changing” sinusoid in resolutioncell

Gives rise to essentially “random” constructive anddestructive interference

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 331 / 412

Page 332: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance

12 Physics of Magnetic ResonanceSpin SystemsMagnetizationNMR SignalExcitationRelaxationBloch EquationsSpin EchoesContrast

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 332 / 412

Page 333: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Spin Systems

NucleiNMR is concerned with nuclei

... but not radioactivity

All nuclei have charge

Some nuclei have angular momentum Φ

Angular momentum + charge ≡ spin

Nuclei with spin are NMR-active

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 333 / 412

Page 334: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Spin Systems

Visualization of Nuclear Spin

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 334 / 412

Page 335: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Spin Systems

Nuclear Spin SystemsNuclear spin systems =

collections of identical nuclei▶ regardless of chemical environment▶ Examples: 1H, 13C, 19F, 31P

Whole-body MRI uses 1H▶ prevalent in the body (water, fat)▶ strong NMR signal▶ misnomer: “proton” imaging

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 335 / 412

Page 336: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Magnetization

Microscopy Magnetic FieldMicroscopic magnetic moment vector:

� = Φ

is gyromagnetic ratio [radians/s-T]

– has more convenient units [Hz/T]

– =

2�

For 1H – = 42.58 MHz/T

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 336 / 412

Page 337: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Magnetization

Nuclear MagnetismPut sample in external magnetic field

B0 = B0z

Spins align in one of two directions▶ 54∘ off z “up”▶ 180− 54∘ off z “down”

Slight preference for “up” direction

Sample becomes magnetized

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 337 / 412

Page 338: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Magnetization

Macroscopic MagnetizationMagnetization vector:

M =

Ns∑n=1

�n

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 338 / 412

Page 339: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Magnetization

Equilibrum MagnetizationEquilibrium value: M0

▶ same direction as B0

▶ depends on x = (x , y , z) only

Magnitude: M0

M0 =B0

2ℏ2

4k–TPD

▶ k– is Boltzmann’s constant▶ T is temperature▶ PD is proton density

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 339 / 412

Page 340: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Magnetization

Evolution of MagnetizationM = M(x, t)

Relation to bulk angular momentum J

M = J

Focus on small sample → voxel

▶ M = M(t)▶ Equations of motion = Bloch equations

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 340 / 412

Page 341: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Magnetization

Torque on “Current Loop”Current loop in magnetic field

▶ magnetic (dipole) moment M▶ magnetic field B▶ torque is � = M× B

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 341 / 412

Page 342: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Magnetization

PrecessionTorque acts on rotating body in “funny” way

Torque is related to angular momentum

� =dJ

dt

Eliminate J to yield

dM(t)

dt= M(t)× B(t)

Equation describes precession

Valid for “short” times

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 342 / 412

Page 343: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Magnetization

Larmor FrequencyLet B(t) = B0; M(0) angle � with z

Then

Mx(t) = M0 sin� cos (− B0t + �)

My(t) = M0 sin� sin (− B0t + �)

Mz(t) = M0 cos�

whereM0 = ∣M(0)∣ � arbitrary

Precession with Larmor frequency

!0 = B0 or �0 = –B0

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 343 / 412

Page 344: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Magnetization

Isochromats!0 not constant for spin system due tomagnetic field inhomogeneities

Main magnetic field, shimming ⇒ ignore

magnetic susceptibility:▶ diamagnetic, paramagnetic, ferromagnetic▶ body/air interface strong change

chemical shift▶ chemical environment ⇒ shielding▶ fat is 3.35 ppm down from water

Isochromats: nuclei with same Larmor freq

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 344 / 412

Page 345: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Magnetization

Magnetization ComponentsMagnetization

M(t) = (Mx(t),My(t),Mz(t))

Think of M(t) with two components

▶ Longitudinal magnetization

Mz(t)

▶ Transverse magnetization

Mxy(t) = Mx(t) + jMy(t)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 345 / 412

Page 346: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance NMR Signal

Origin of NMR SignalPrinciple of Reciprocity

Br(r) is field produced at r by unit directcurrent in coil around sample.

⇒ Now reverse scenario ⇐Voltage produced in coil by changing magnetic fieldis (by Faraday’s law of induction)

V (t) = − ∂

∂t

∫object

M(r, t) ⋅ Br(r) dr

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 346 / 412

Page 347: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance NMR Signal

NMR SignalLongitudinal magnetization changes too slow

Transverse magnetization dominates

Mxy(t) = M0 sin�e−j(!0t−�)

Final expression

V (t) = −!0VsM0 sin�B r sin(−!0t + �− �r)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 347 / 412

Page 348: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance NMR Signal

Rotating FrameCoordinate transformation

x ′ = x cos(!0t)− y sin(!0t)

y ′ = x sin(!0t) + y sin(!0t)

z ′ = z

Transverse magnetization in rotating frame

Mx ′y ′(t) = M0 sin�e j�

Magnitude M0 sin�

Phase angle �

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 348 / 412

Page 349: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Excitation

RF ExcitationCircularly polarized RF excitation pulse

B1(t) = Be1 (t)e−j(!0t−')

Yields forced precession

M(t) motion is spiral

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 349 / 412

Page 350: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Excitation

Tip Anglez-magnetization magnitude after excitation

Mz = M0 cos�

Tip angle is

� =

∫ �p

0

Be1 (t)dt

where �p is pulse duration

For rectangular pulse:

� = B1�p

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 350 / 412

Page 351: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Relaxation

RelaxationMagnetization cannot precess forever

Two independent relaxation processes

Transverse relaxation▶ ≡ spin-spin relaxation

Longitudinal relaxation▶ ≡ spin-lattice relaxation

Detailed properties differ in tissues▶ Gives rise to tissue contrast

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 351 / 412

Page 352: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Relaxation

Transverse Relaxation

Transverse relaxation decays

Mxy(t) = M0 sin�e−j(!0t−�)e−t/T2

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 352 / 412

Page 353: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Relaxation

Free Induction DecayWhat RF signal is produced?

Called a free induction decay (FID)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 353 / 412

Page 354: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Relaxation

T ∗2 DecayIn fact RF signal decays faster

T ∗2 < T2

Underlying T2 relaxation is preservedJerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 354 / 412

Page 355: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Relaxation

Longitudinal RelaxationMz(t) behaves as rising exponential

Mz(t) = M0(1− e−t/T1) + Mz(0+)e−t/T1

Mz(0+) is value after RF excitation pulseM0 is final (equilibrium) value

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 355 / 412

Page 356: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Bloch Equations

Bloch EquationsEquation(s) of “motion” for M(t)

dM(t)

dt= M(t)× B(t)− R{M(t)−M0}

Includes RF excitation

B(t) = B0 + B1(t) ,

Includes relaxation

R =

⎛⎝ 1/T2 0 00 1/T2 00 0 1/T1

⎞⎠Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 356 / 412

Page 357: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Spin Echoes

Concept of Spin EchoesPure transverse relaxation T2 is random

So why faster decay T ∗2 ?

▶ Fixed, local perturbations in magnetic field▶ Local dephasing from faster & slower spins

Echoes produced by “re-phasing”

▶ Make slower spins “jump” to front▶ Make faster spins “jump” to rear

TE is echo time

Multiple echoes are possible until about 3T2

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 357 / 412

Page 358: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Spin Echoes

Formation of a Spin Echo

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 358 / 412

Page 359: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Spin Echoes

Pulse Sequence for Spin Echo

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 359 / 412

Page 360: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Contrast

Source of MR ContrastMR Contrast: why tissues “look” different in MRI

Intrinsic MR parameters:▶ T1, T2, and PD

Pulse sequence parameters:▶ tip angle �▶ echo time TE

▶ pulse repetition interval TR

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 360 / 412

Page 361: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Contrast

Contrast Manipulation

PD-weighted T2-weighted T1-weighted

Weighted means “primarily influenced by”

Weighted does not mean “a picture of”

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 361 / 412

Page 362: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Contrast

PD-weighted ContrastShould be proportional to # 1H nuclei in voxel

Procedure:▶ Start with sample in equilibrium▶ Apply excitation pulse▶ Image quickly

Practical parameters:▶ TR = 6000 ms (long)▶ TE = 17 ms (relatively quick)▶ � = �/2 (max signal)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 362 / 412

Page 363: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Contrast

T2-weighted ContrastEcho must be used because of T ∗2Procedure:

▶ Start with sample in equilibrium▶ Apply excitation pulse▶ Image at approx T2

Practical parameters:▶ TR = 6000 ms (long)▶ TE = 102 ms (moderate)▶ � = �/2 (max signal)

Trick: get PD and T2 in two echoes

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 363 / 412

Page 364: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Contrast

Principle of T1-weighted Contrast

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 364 / 412

Page 365: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Physics of Magnetic Resonance Contrast

T1-weighted ContrastUses TR to capture T1 differences

Procedure:▶ Reach a steady-state, not equilibrium▶ Apply excitation so that TR ≈ T1

▶ Image quickly

Possible parameters:▶ TR = 600 ms (moderate)▶ TE = 17 ms (fast)▶ � = �/2 (max signal)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 365 / 412

Page 366: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

13 Magnetic Resonance ImagingMR Scanner ComponentsFrequency EncodingSlice SelectionSignal ModelsScanning Fourier SpaceGradient EchoesPhase EncodingSpin EchoesRealistic Pulse SequencesImage ReconstructionSampling, Resolution, and Noise

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 366 / 412

Page 367: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

Five System Components1 Main magnet2 Gradient coils3 RF resonators or coils4 Pulse sequence electronics5 Computer and viewing console

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 367 / 412

Page 368: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

MR Scanner Components

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 368 / 412

Page 369: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

MR Scanner Photograph

http://www.gehealthcare.com http://www.gehealthcare.com

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 369 / 412

Page 370: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

Superconducting Magnet1 meter niobium-titanium wiresuperconducting coils4∘ K liquid helium cryostat

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 370 / 412

Page 371: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

Magnet SpecificationsField strengths from 0.5T to 12.0T

Most common field strength: 1.5T

Shimming to maintain homogeneous field▶ passive shimming▶ active shimming▶ better than ±5 ppm required

Minimize fringe field (outside the bore)

▶ nuisance and dangerous▶ passive: iron shield, or▶ active: second superconducting wires

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 371 / 412

Page 372: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

Purpose of Gradient CoilsFit just inside the bore

Role: change B0 as a function of position

Three coils:▶ x , y , and z directions▶ Gx , Gy , and Gz strengths

Modify main field as follows

B = (B0 + Gxx + Gyy + Gzz)z

This is the key to MR imaging

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 372 / 412

Page 373: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

Gradient Coilsx and y are saddle coilsz is opposing coils

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 373 / 412

Page 374: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

Specifications of Gradient CoilsMaximum gradient 1–6 Gauss/cm

Switching times 0.1–1.0 ms

slew rates 5–250 mT/m/msec

Additional shielding outside to reduceeddy currents

FDA limit 40 T/s

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 374 / 412

Page 375: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

RF CoilsTwo purposes:

▶ Exciting spin systems▶ Listening for FIDs and echoes

Two basic types:▶ volume coils▶ surface coils

Volume coils have uniform response

Surface coils are more sensitive buthave spatially-dependent response

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 375 / 412

Page 376: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

RF Coil Designs

(a) saddle coil: head

(b) birdcage coil: body, head

(c) surface loop: peripherals

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 376 / 412

Page 377: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

Scanning Console and ComputerControl scanner

Acquire images

Coordinate with EKG and breathing

Reconstruct images (10–50 images/s)

View, store, and manipulate images

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 377 / 412

Page 378: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging MR Scanner Components

Laboratory Coordinates

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 378 / 412

Page 379: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Frequency Encoding

(Larmor) Frequency EncodingGradient G = (Gx ,Gy ,Gz) produces B-field:

B = (B0 + G ⋅ r)z

where r = (x , y , z)

Spatially varying Larmor frequency

�(r) = –(B0 + G ⋅ r)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 379 / 412

Page 380: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Slice Selection

Principle of Slice SelectionLet G = (0, 0,Gz)

Then�(r) = �(z) = –(B0 + Gzz)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 380 / 412

Page 381: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Slice Selection

Slice Selection ExcitationExcite frequencies � ∈ [�1, �2]

Causes “slab” excitation of spin system

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 381 / 412

Page 382: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Slice Selection

Slice Selection ParametersRF parameters:

� =�1 + �2

2center frequency

Δ� = ∣�2 − �1∣ frequency range

Slice parameters:

z =� − �0

–Gzslice position

Δz =Δ�

–Gzslice thickness

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 382 / 412

Page 383: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Slice Selection

Ideal Slice Selection RF ExcitationExcite frequencies in range [�1, �2] HzExcitation signal has Fourier transform

S(�) = A rect

(� − �

Δ�

)Signal is s(t) = A� sinc(�t)e j2��t

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 383 / 412

Page 384: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Slice Selection

Practical Slice Selection RF ExcitationTruncated sinc

s(t) =[A� sinc(�t)e j2��t

]rect(t/�p)

Corresponding tip angle profile:

�(z) = A�prect

(z − z

Δz

)∗ sinc (�p Gz(z − z))

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 384 / 412

Page 385: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Slice Selection

Slice Dephasing and RefocussingDifference Larmor frequencies across slice:

▶ “slow” on low side▶ “fast” on high side

Phase difference is

�(z) = Gz(z − z)�p/2

Refocus with negative gradient pulse▶ strength −Gz

▶ duration �/2

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 385 / 412

Page 386: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Slice Selection

A Simple Pulse Sequence

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 386 / 412

Page 387: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Models

Basic Signal ModelSlice selection FID is

s(t) = e−j2��0t

∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

f (x , y) dx dy

Where effective spin density is

f (x , y) = AM(x , y ; 0+)e−t/T2(x ,y)

Baseband signal is

s0(t) =

∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

f (x , y) dx dy

Note: T ∗2 always decays the FID signal

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 387 / 412

Page 388: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Models

Frequency Encoding

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 388 / 412

Page 389: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Models

Frequency Encoding SignalLarmor frequency is function of x

�(x) = –(B0 + Gxx)

Baseband signal becomes

s0(t) =

∫ ∞−∞

∫ ∞−∞

f (x , y)e−j2� –Gxxt dx dy

Recognize Fourier transform frequencies:

u = –Gxt

v = 0

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 389 / 412

Page 390: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanning Fourier Space

Relation to Fourier transform

F (u, 0) = s0

(u

–Gx

)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 390 / 412

Page 391: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanning Fourier Space

Polar Scanning

u = –Gxt v = –Gy t

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 391 / 412

Page 392: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanning Fourier Space

Scanning Fourier SpaceIgnore readout/ADC

Applied gradients “drive” us around in Fourier space

This is concept of Fourier trajectory

Fourier trajectories underly all MRI▶ spin echoes▶ gradient echoes▶ frequency encoding▶ polar scanning▶ phase encoding

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 392 / 412

Page 393: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Gradient Echoes

Gradient Echoes

Note: T ∗2 decay overall

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 393 / 412

Page 394: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phase Encoding

Phase Encoding

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 394 / 412

Page 395: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phase Encoding

Phase Encoding SignalAccumulated phase after phase encode

�y(y) = − GyTpy

Baseband signal during readout

s0(t) =

∞∫−∞

∞∫−∞

f (x , y)e−j2� –Gxxte−j2� –GyTpy dx dy

Recognize Fourier transform frequencies:

u = –Gxt

v = –GyTp

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 395 / 412

Page 396: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phase Encoding

Gradient Echo Pulse Sequence

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 396 / 412

Page 397: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Spin Echoes

Concept of a Spin Echo

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 397 / 412

Page 398: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Spin Echoes

Basic “Spin Echo” Pulse Sequence

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 398 / 412

Page 399: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Realistic Pulse Sequences

Realistic Gradient Echo Pulse Sequence

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 399 / 412

Page 400: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Realistic Pulse Sequences

Realistic Spin Echo Pulse Sequence

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 400 / 412

Page 401: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Realistic Pulse Sequences

Realistic Spin Echo Polar Pulse Sequence

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 401 / 412

Page 402: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Image Reconstruction

Acquired Rectilinear DataAcquire data for all phase encode areas

Ay = GyTp

Baseband signal

s0(t,Ay) =

∫ ∫f (x , y)e−j2� –Gxxte−j2� –Ayydxdy

Identify Fourier frequencies

u = –Gxt

v = –Ay

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 402 / 412

Page 403: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Image Reconstruction

Image Reconstruction: Rectilinear DataFourier transform is built over repetitions

F (u, v) = s0

(u

–Gx,v

)0 ≤ u ≤ –GxTs

Inverse Fourier transform

f (x , y) =

∫ ∫s0

(u

–Gx,v

)e+j2�(ux+vy)dxdy

This is a fundamental equation in MRI

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 403 / 412

Page 404: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Image Reconstruction

Acquired Polar DataGx and Gy identify readout parameters

% = –t√

G 2x + G 2

y

� = tan−1 Gy

Gx

Projection slice theorem connects 2D Fourier spaceto Fourier transform of 1D projection

G (%, �) = F (% cos �, % sin �)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 404 / 412

Page 405: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Image Reconstruction

Image Reconstruction: Polar DataBaseband signal is s0(t, �)

Relation to 1-D projection

G (%, �) = s0

⎛⎜⎝ %

–√G 2x + G 2

y

, �

⎞⎟⎠Filtered backprojection is the answer

f (x , y) =∫ �

0

[∫∣%∣G (%, �)e j2�%ℓ d%

]ℓ=x cos �+y sin �

d�

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 405 / 412

Page 406: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sampling, Resolution, and Noise

SamplingDuration of readout

Ts = NaT

Receiver bandwidth (sampling rate)

fs =1

T

Antialiasing filter chops outside [−fs/2, fs/2]

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 406 / 412

Page 407: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sampling, Resolution, and Noise

Readout Field of ViewAntialiasing filter chops Larmor frequencies,leading to

FOVx =fs –Gx

=1

–GxT

Step in Fourier space is

Δu = –GxT

Relation to field of view

FOVx =1

Δu

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 407 / 412

Page 408: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sampling, Resolution, and Noise

Phase Encode Field of ViewStep size in phase encode direction:

Δv = – ΔAy

Field of view

FOVy =1

– ΔAy

=1

Δv

Lack of antialising filter could cause wrap-around

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 408 / 412

Page 409: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sampling, Resolution, and Noise

ResolutionFourier space coverage

U = Nx –GxT

V = Ny –ΔAy

Implied lowpass filter is

H(u, v) = rect( uU

)rect

( vV

)Spatial PSF is

h(x , y) = UV sinc(Ux)sinc(Vy)

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 409 / 412

Page 410: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sampling, Resolution, and Noise

Full Width Half Max’sFWHMs are

FWHMx =1

U=

1

Nx –GxT=

1

NxΔu

FWHMy =1

V=

1

Ny –ΔAy=

1

NyΔv

The Fourier resolutions of MRI

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 410 / 412

Page 411: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sampling, Resolution, and Noise

NoiseJohnson (thermal) noise dominates

�2 =2k–T RTA

k– = Boltzmann’s constant

T = temperature ⇒ colder is better

R = effective resistance ⇒ use small coils

TA = total acquisition time ⇒ scan longer

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 411 / 412

Page 412: Prince&Links-Medical Imaging Signals&Systems Allslides 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sampling, Resolution, and Noise

Signal-to-Noise RatioRecall magnitude of signal is

∣V ∣ = 2��0VsM0 sin�B r

Signal-to-noise Ratio is

SNR =∣V ∣√�2

= h2

√4�k–

2��0PD√�

r 20

√LT 3

Vs sin�√TA

Jerry L. Prince (Johns Hopkins University) Medical Imaging Signals and Systems August 20, 2009 412 / 412