prof. joachim reuder, geophysical institute, university of … days sept 19/s3 r… · the...
TRANSCRIPT
The potential of lidar technology for wind power meteorology Prof. Joachim Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen
NORCOWE days, Bergen 19.09.2012
Outline
• Introduction
• lidar principle
• lidar wind profilers
• scanning lidar systems
• multiple beam systems
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
motivation/fields of research
• wind resource estimates (10 min averages, turbulence intensity, wind shear)
• power curve determination
• monitoring of the incoming wind field for turbine control purposes
• investigation of wake effects
• single turbine
• near wake effects inside wind parks
• far wake effect behind larger wind farms
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Introduction
• LIDAR (light detection and ranging)
• acronym was introduced in 1953 in the book “Weather Instruments” (before the invention of lasers)
• laser (light amplification by the stimulated emission of radiation) first used by Gordon Gould in 1958
• main application in the beginning: distance measurements for military applications
• from mid of the 1970s increasing activities for the use of lidars in atmospheric research, now covering a wide range of applications
• determination of tropospheric aerosol concentration and properties
• stratospheric ozone profiles
• temperature and winds in the mesosphere (ca 90 km altitude)
• application of for wind measurements in the lower troposphere are relatively new
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Measurement principle
• sending out photons at an
infrared wavelength of
typically around 1.5 mm (in
pulses or continuously)
• the Doppler-shift of photons
backscattered at aerosol
particles moved with the
wind is measured
• measurement in at least 3
different directions enables
the determination of the 3
dimensional wind vector
Source: http://www.leosphere.com/file/leosphere_windcube.pdf
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
pulsed lidar
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Source: http://www.leosphere.com/file/leosphere_windcube.pdf
Vr27
0
V V
V
V
Vr0
Vr18
0
Vr9
0
a
Typical measurement pattern:
• ~ 10000 laser pulses emitted in
each direction (total ca. 0.5 s)
• measuring in different directions
(typically steps of 90 degrees)
Measurement hypothesis :
• Homogeneous and stationary
wind conditions
continuous wave (cw) lidar
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/30195938/Natural-Power-ZephIR-Brochure-Ecopy
Typical measurement pattern:
• the laser beam is focussed to a
given altitude
• a certain number of
measurements is taken over a
circular scan pattern (typically 50
measurements of 20 ms each)
• the laser is focussed to the next
altitude
pulsed lidar – continuous wave (cw) lidar
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Pulsed lidar Continuous lidar
Pros Measures all altitudes
simultaneously
Fast full profile measurement
No altitude ambiguity
Fast single point measurement
(20ms)
Low minimum altitude (10m)
High vertical resolution at low
altitudes
Cons − Slow single point measurement
(0.5 s)
− Higher complexity and cost
− High minimum altitude (40 m)
and modest vertical resolution
(20 m)
− Slow full profile measurement
− Vertical resolution decreases
with increasing altitude
− Possible altitude ambiguity
− Limited maximum altitude (200-
300 m)
Courtesy: Jon Hellevang, CMR Instrumentation
commercially available wind profilers
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Windcube (Leosphere)
ZephIR (Natural Powers)
Gallion (Sgurr Energy)
Vindicator (Catch the Wind)
comparison lidar - mast
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Courtesy: Michael Courtney, DTU, Risø
A good sited and good maintained wind lidar can provide wind data with
a quality comparable to cup anemometers; mast effects (wake/speed
up) on the cup measurements have to be excluded
Windcube vs Cup at 80my = 0.9468x + 0.2685
R2 = 0.9071
y = 0.9788x
R2 = 0.9058
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 5 10 15 20 25
Cup speed 80m [m/s]
Lid
ar
sp
ee
d [
m/s
]
Windcube vs Cup at 80my = 0.9969x - 0.0447
R2 = 0.9962
y = 0.9922x
R2 = 0.9962
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 5 10 15 20 25
Cup speed 80m [m/s]L
ida
r s
pe
ed
[m
/s]
scanning lidar systems
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Gallion (Sgurr Energy)
range: 4000 m
resolution 40 m
Leosphere
WindCube 100S/200S
range: 3000 - 6000 m
resolution 50 – 100 m
measurement geometries
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
PPI (plan position indicator): azimuth-scan
E N
W
S height
RHI (range height indicator): elevation scan
N
N
W
height
height
W O S
scanning lidar systems
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
scanning lidar systems
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Source: http://halo-photonics.com/Galion-data-examples.htm
30 minute average over
multiple PPI scans
single PPI scan in an active
wind park
scanning lidar systems
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Source: http://presentations.copernicus.org/EGU2012-8708_presentation.pdf courtesy G.V. Iungo
scanning lidar systems
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Source: http://presentations.copernicus.org/EGU2012-8708_presentation.pdf courtesy G.V. Iungo
scanning lidar systems
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Source: http://www.ifb.uni-stuttgart.de/en/forschung/windenergie/research-projects/296-lidarswe
lidar going offshore
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
• why?
• poor information on the offshore wind field in the relevant height interval (30..200 m)
• corresponding mast structures are expansive and rather inflexible
• challenges:
• motion avoidance or motion correction
• adaptation to harsh marine environment
• energy for long term deployments
lidar going offshore
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
SeaZephIR
(Natural Power)
ZephIR lidar on
spare or tension
leg buoy
Flidar
(3E)
Windcube on
industrial buy;
mechanical
stsbilization
WindSentinel
(Axys)
Vindicator on a
boat structure
Wavescan ZephIR
(Fugro Oceanor)
ZephIR on
Wavescan buoy
lidar movement testing
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
Stewart platform
• R&D project under participation
of several NORCOWE and
NOWITECH partners
• application of 55 different motion
patterns on a 6-DOF motion
platform, 3 hours each
offshore comparison
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
source: Final Report of the project “Measurements of Wind Profile from a Buoy using Lidar” in cooperation between Fugro OCEANOR, Statoil, University of Bergen, Uni Research, Christian Michelsen Research (CMR) and Marintek
multiple beam systems
J.- Reuder, Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen NORCOWE days, 19.09.2012, Bergen
source: http://www.risoe.dtu.dk/research/sustainable_energy/wind_energy/projects/vea_wind_scanner.aspx?sc_lang=en/
WindScanner: EU joint
research infrastructures
project under lead of DTU in
Denmark
• 3 beams measuring
simultaneous in one
positionLeosphere
• inststanteneous information
on wind speed (and
turbulence) at one point
without the assumption of
homogeneity of the wind
field