professional development for teachers

10
Road Map to Digital Literacy How to standardize teaching in order to produce digitally literate kids who are “info-savvy, media-fluent and tech-tuned” (Trilling & Fadel, 2009, p. 61)

Upload: dallas-mcpheeters-med

Post on 03-Mar-2016

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A roadmap explaining the why and how of quality professional development that prepares teachers for handling technology with pedagogical finesse.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Professional Development for Teachers

Road Map to Digital LiteracyHow to standardize teaching in order to produce digitally literate kids who are “info-savvy, media-fluent and tech-tuned”

(Trilling & Fadel, 2009, p. 61)

Page 2: Professional Development for Teachers

The Road Blocks*

Lack of Technology Expertise

Resistance

Lack of Time

Tradition

Lack of Research

Lack of Vision

*(adapted from Lumley & Bailey, 1993)

Page 3: Professional Development for Teachers

The Road Map

Needs Assessment

Teacher Support

PLEs & PLNs

Feedback Loops

Evaluation

Page 4: Professional Development for Teachers

Quick Survey AssessmentsShort survey assessments are prepared and ready to deploy as needed to regularly update progress.

Page 5: Professional Development for Teachers

Teacher Support

Teachers will use simple online tools to create their unique Personal Learning Environment.

Personal Learning Networks will consist of those groups deemed critical to each teacher’s success.

Page 6: Professional Development for Teachers

Why PLE & PLN?

We’re in this together...• Constructivism 1

• Group-paced approach 2

1 Morrison, Ross, & Kemp, 2007, p. 146.2 Lebow, 1994

• Generative learning 3

• Observation & application 4

3 Wittrock (1989)4 Morrison, Ross, & Kemp (2007)

Page 7: Professional Development for Teachers

Feedback LoopsContinuous feedback helps detect as well as prevent cognitive overload. (Reigeluth, 1999)

Page 8: Professional Development for Teachers

Evaluation“Learning is promoted when learners engage in a task-centered instructional strategy” (Merrill, 2002). Such strategies are easier to assess in a constructivist manner through self and peer evaluations as well as project portfolios, thus constructing additional learning.

1 Authentic assessment strategies (Gustafson & Branch, 2002; Nelson & Erlandson, 2007).

Page 9: Professional Development for Teachers

Evaluation

1 Authentic assessment strategies (Gustafson & Branch, 2002; Nelson & Erlandson, 2007).

Authentic assessment strategies 1

• Self-evaluationvia polls

• Peer-to-peer evaluationvia posts

• Project portfoliovia wiki

Page 10: Professional Development for Teachers

ReferencesLebow, D. (1994) . Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 4-16.

Lumley, D. & Bailey, G. (1993). Planning for technology: A guidebook for school administrators. New York: Scholastic.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2007). Designing effective instruction (5th edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Volume II) (pp. 5-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved online September 30, 2009, from Google Books: http://bit.ly/3dbD15

Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.