programmable logic controller - wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

8/9/2019 Programmable Logic Controller - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

1/11

10/2/2015 Pr ogr amm abl e l ogic contr ol ler - W iki pedi a, the fr ee encycl opedi a

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmable_logic_controller

Siemens Simatic S7-400 system at

rack, left-to-right: power supply unit

PS407 4A, CPU 416-3, interface

module IM 460-0 and communication

processor CP 443-1.

Programmable logic controllerFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A programmable logic controller, PLC or programmable

controller is a digital computer used for automation of typically

industrial electromechanical processes, such as control of machinery

on factory assembly lines, amusement rides, or light fixtures. PLCs

are used in many industries and machines. PLCs are designed for multiple analogue and digital inputs and output arrangements,

extended temperature ranges, immunity to electrical noise, and

resistance to vibration and impact. Programs to control machine

operation are typically stored in battery-backed-up or non-volatile

memory. A PLC is an example of a "hard" real-time system since

output results must be produced in response to input conditions

within a limited time, otherwise unintended operation will result.

Before the PLC, control, sequencing, and safety interlock logic for

manufacturing automobiles was mainly composed of relays, camtimers, drum sequencers, and dedicated closed-loop controllers.

Since these could number in the hundreds or even thousands, the

process for updating such facilities for the yearly model change-over

was very time consuming and expensive, as electricians needed to

individually rewire the relays to change their oper ational

characteristics.

Digital computers, being general-purpose programmable devices,

were soon applied to control of industrial processes. Early

computers required specialist programmers, and stringent operatingenvironmental control for temperature, cleanliness, and power

quality. Using a general-purpose computer for process control required protecting the computer from the

plant floor conditions. An industrial control computer would have several attributes: it would tolerate the

shop-floor environment, it would support discrete ( bit-form) input and output in an easily extensible

manner, it would not require years of training to use, and it would permit its operation to be monitored. Th

response time of any com puter system must be fast enough to be useful for control; the required speed

varying according to the nature of the process.[1] Since many industrial processes have timescales easily

addressed by millisecond response times, modern (fast, small, reliable) electronics greatly facilitate buildin

reliable controllers, especially because performance can be traded off for reliability.

In 1968 GM Hydra-Matic (the automatic transmission division of General Motors) issued a request for

proposals for an electronic replacement for hard-wired relay systems based on a white paper written by

engineer Edward R. Clark. The winning proposal came from Bedford Associates of Bedford,

Massachusetts. The first PLC, designated the 084 because it was Bedford Associates' eighty-fourth project

was the result.[2] Bedford Associates started a new company dedicated to developing, manufacturing,

selling, and servicing this new product: Modicon, which stood for MOdular DIgital CONtroller. One of th

people who worked on that project was Dick Morley, who is considered to be the "father" of the PLC.[3]

The Modicon brand was sold in 1977 to Gould Electronics, and later acquired by German Company AEG

and then by French Schneider Electric, the current owner.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford,_Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford,_Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricianhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Changeoverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-volatile_memoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_computinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-volatile_memoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-volatile_memoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noise_(electronics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_linehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusement_rideshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_fixturehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromechanicalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gould_Electronicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydra-Matichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Changeoverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_transmissionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AEGhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schneider_Electrichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricianhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusement_rideshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motorshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_computerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_computinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-volatile_memoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cam_timerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromechanicalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford,_Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_fixturehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noise_(electronics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_linehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Siemens_Simatic_S7-416-3.jpghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drum_sequencer_(controller)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Morley


2/11


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmable_logic_controller 2

One of the very first 084 models built is now on display at Modicon's headquarters in North Andover,

Massachusetts. It was presented to Modicon by GM, when the unit was retired after nearly twenty years of

uninterrupted service. Modicon used the 84 moniker at the end of its product range until the 984 made its

appearance.

The automotive industry is still one of the largest users of PLCs.

Contents

1 Development

1.1 Programming

2 Functionality

2.1 Programmable logic relay (PLR)

3 PLC topics

3.1 Features3.2 Scan time

3.3 System scale

3.4 User interface

3.5 Communications

3.6 Programming

3.7 Security

3.8 Simulation

3.9 Redundancy

4 PLC compared with other control systems

5 Discrete and analog signals

5.1 Example

6 See also

7 References

8 Further reading

9 External links

evelopment

Early PLCs were designed to replace relay logic systems. These PLCs were programmed in "ladder logic"

which strongly resembles a schematic diagram of relay logic. This program notation was chosen to reduce

training demands for the existing technicians. Other early PLCs used a form of instruction list

programming, based on a stack-based logic solver.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Andover,_Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motorshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladder_logichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instruction_list


3/11



Modern PLCs can be programmed in a variety of ways, from the relay-derived ladder logic to programmin

languages such as specially adapted dialects of BASIC and C. Another method is State Logic, a very high-

level programming language designed to program PLCs based on state transition diagrams.

Many early PLCs did not have accompanying programming terminals that were capable of graphical

representation of the logic, and so the logic was instead represented as a series of logic expressions in som

version of Boolean format, similar to Boolean algebra. As programming terminals evolved, it became mor

common for ladder logic to be used, for the aforementioned reasons and because it was a familiar format

used for electromechanical control panels. Newer formats such as State Logic and Function Block (which similar to the way logic is depicted when using digital integrated logic circuits) exist, but they are still not

as popular as ladder logic. A primary reason for this is that PLCs solve the logic in a predictable and

repeating sequence, and ladder logic allows the programmer (the person writing the logic) to see any issue

with the timing of the logic sequence more easily than would be possible in other formats.

Programming

Early PLCs, up to the mid-1990s, were programmed using proprietary programming panels or special-

purpose programming terminals, which often had dedicated function keys representing the various logical

elements of PLC programs.[2] Some proprietary programming terminals displayed the elements of PLC

programs as graphic symbols, but plain ASCII character representations of contacts, coils, and wires were

common. Programs were stored on cassette tape cartridges. Facilities for printing and documentation were

minimal due to lack of memory capacity. The very oldest PLCs used non-volatile magnetic core memory.

More recently, PLCs are programmed using application software on personal computers, which now

represent the logic in graphic form instead of character symbols. The computer is connected to the PLC

through Ethernet, RS-232, RS-485 or RS-422 cabling. The programming software allows entry and editing

of the ladder-style logic. Generally the software provides functions for debugging and troubleshooting the

PLC software, for example, by highlighting portions of the logic to show current status during operation or

via simulation. The software will upload and download the PLC program, for backup and restoration

purposes. In some models of programmable controller, the program is transferred from a personal compute

to the PLC through a programming board which writes the program into a removable chip such as an

EEPROM or EPROM.

Functionality

The functionality of the PLC has evolved over the years to include sequential relay control, motion control

process control, distributed control systems and networking. The data handling, storage, processing power

and communication capabilities of some modern PLCs are approximately equivalent to desktop computersPLC-like programming combined with remote I/O hardware, allow a general-purpose desktop computer to

overlap some PLCs in certain applications. Desktop computer controllers have not been generally accepted

in heavy industry because the desktop computers run on less stable operating systems than do PLCs, and

because the desktop computer hardware is typically not designed to the same levels of tolerance to

temperature, humidity, vibration, and longevity as the processors used in PLCs. Operating systems such as

Windows do not lend themselves to deterministic logic execution, with the result that the controller may no

always respond to changes of input status with the consistency in timing expected from PLCs. Desktop

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_diagramhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_logichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPROMhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_controlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebrahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EEPROMhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_control_systemhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Logichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high-level_programming_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-422http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-485http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desktop_computerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-232http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_terminalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Programming_board&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_(programming_language)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassette_tape_cartridgehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BASIChttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_core_memoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_network


4/11



logic applications find use in less critical situations, such as laboratory automation and use in small

facilities where the application is less demanding and critical, because they are generally much less

expensive than PLCs.

Programmable logic relay (PLR)

In more recent years, small products called PLRs (programmable logic relays), and also by similar names,

have become more common and accepted. These are very much like PLCs, and are used in light industry

where only a few points of I/O (i.e. a few signals coming in from the real world and a few going out) are

involved, and low cost is desired. These small devices are typically made in a common physical size and

shape by several manufacturers, and branded by the makers of larger PLCs to fill out their low end produc

range. Popular names include PICO Controller, NANO PLC, and other names implying very small

controllers. Most of these have between 8 and 12 discrete inputs, 4 and 8 discrete outputs, and up to 2

analog inputs. Size is usually about 4" wide, 3" high, and 3" deep. Most such devices include a tiny postage

stamp sized LCD screen for viewing simplified ladder logic (only a very small portion of the program bein

visible at a given time) and status of I/O points, and typically these screens are accompanied by a 4-way

rocker push-button plus four more separate push-buttons, similar to the key buttons on a VCR remote

control, and used to navigate and edit the logic. Most have a small plug for connecting via RS-232 or RS-

485 to a personal computer so that programmers can use simple Windows applications for programming

instead of being forced to use the tiny LCD and push-button set for this purpose. Unlike regular PLCs that

are usually modular and greatly expandable, the PLRs are usually not modular or expandable, but their

price can be two orders of magnitude less than a PLC and they still offer robust design and deterministic

execution of the logics.

PLC topics

Features

The main difference from other computers is that PLCs are armored for severe conditions (such as dust,

moisture, heat, cold) and have the facility for extensive input/output (I/O) arrangements. These connect the

PLC to sensors and actuators. PLCs read limit switches, analog process variables (such as temperature and

pressure), and the positions of complex positioning systems. Some use machine vision.[4] On the actuator

side, PLCs operate electric motors, pneumatic or hydraulic cylinders, magnetic relays, solenoids, or analog

outputs. The input/output arrangements may be built into a simple PLC, or the PLC may have external I/O

modules attached to a computer network that plugs into the PLC.

Scan time

A PLC program is generally executed repeatedly as long as the controlled system is running. The status of

physical input points is copied to an area of memory accessible to the processor, sometimes called the "I/O

Image Table". The program is then run from its first instruction rung down to the last rung. It takes some

time for the processor of the PLC to evaluate all the rungs and update the I/O image table with the status o

outputs.[5] This scan time may be a few milliseconds for a small program or on a fast processor, but older

PLCs running very large programs could take much longer (say, up to 100 ms) to execute the program. If

the scan time were too long, the response of the PLC to process conditions would be too slow to be useful.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog_signalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_motorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actuatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_switchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solenoidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I/Ohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitudehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Input/outputhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pneumatichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_visionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relay


5/11



Control panel with PLC (grey

elements in the center). The unit

consists of separate elements, from

left to right; power supply, controller

relay units for in- and output

As PLCs became more advanced, methods were developed to

change the sequence of ladder execution, and subroutines were

implemented.[6] This simplified programming could be used to save

scan time for high-speed processes; for example, parts of the

program used only for setting up the machine could be segregated

from those parts required to operate at higher speed.

Special-purpose I/O modules may be used where the scan time of

the PLC is too long to allow predictable performance. Precision

timing modules, or counter modules for use with shaft encoders, are

used where the scan time would be too long to reliably count pulses

or detect the sense of rotation of an encoder. The relatively slow

PLC can still interpret the counted values to control a machine, but

the accumulation of pulses is done by a dedicated module that is

unaffected by the speed of the program execution.

System scale

A small PLC will have a fixed number of connections built in for

inputs and outputs. Typically, expansions are available if the base

model has insufficient I/O.

Modular PLCs have a chassis (also called a rack) into which are

placed modules with different functions. The processor and

selection of I/O modules are customized for the particular

application. Several racks can be administered by a single processor, and may have thousands of inputs an

outputs. A special high speed serial I/O link is used so that racks can be distributed away from the

processor, reducing the wiring costs for large plants.

User interface

PLCs may need to interact with people for the purpose of configuration, alarm reporting or everyday

control. A human-machine interface (HMI) is employed for this purpose. HMIs are also referred to as man

machine interfaces (MMIs) and graphical user interfaces (GUIs). A simple system may use buttons and

lights to interact with the user. Text displays are available as well as graphical touch screens. More comple

systems use programming and monitoring software installed on a computer, with the PLC connected via a

communication interface.

Communications

PLCs have built in communications ports, usually 9-pin RS-232, but optionally EIA-485 or Ethernet.

Modbus, BACnet or DF1 is usually included as one of the communications protocols. Other options includ

various fieldbuses such as DeviceNet or Profibus. Other communications protocols that may be used are

listed in the List of automation protocols.

Most modern PLCs can communicate over a network to some other system, such as a computer running a

SCADA (Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition) system or web browser.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_supplyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_automation_protocolshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PLC_Control_Panel.pnghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modbushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BACnethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCADAhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotary_encoderhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profibushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EIA-485http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieldbushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-232http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeviceNethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_protocolshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DF-1_Protocolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCADA#Human.E2.80.93machine_interface


6/11



PLCs used in larger I/O systems may have peer-to-peer (P2P) communication between processors. This

allows separate parts of a complex process to have individual control while allowing the subsystems to co-

ordinate over the communication link. These communication links are also often used for HMI devices suc

as keypads or PC-type workstations.

Formerly, some manufacturers offered dedicated communication modules as an add-on function where the

processor had no network connection built-in.

Programming

PLC programs are typically written in a special application on a personal computer, then downloaded by a

direct-connection cable or over a network to the PLC. The program is stored in the PLC either in battery-

backed-up RAM or some other non-volatile flash memory. Often, a single PLC can be programmed to

replace thousands of relays.[7]

Under the IEC 61131-3 standard, PLCs can be programmed using standards-based programming language

A graphical programming notation called Sequential Function Charts is available on certain programmable

controllers. Initially most PLCs utilized Ladder Logic Diagram Programming, a model which emulated

electromechanical control panel devices (such as the contact and coils of relays) which PLCs replaced. Thi

model remains common today.

IEC 61131-3 currently defines five programming languages for programmable control systems: function

block diagram (FBD), ladder diagram (LD), structured text (ST; similar to the Pascal programming

language), instruction list (IL; similar to assembly language) and sequential function chart (SFC). [8] These

techniques emphasize logical organization of operations.[7]

While the fundamental concepts of PLC programming are common to all manufacturers, differences in I/O

addressing, memory organization and instruction sets mean that PLC programs are never perfectly

interchangeable between different makers. Even within the same product line of a single manufacturer,

different models may not be directly compatible.

Security

Prior to the discovery of the Stuxnet computer virus in June 2010, security of PLCs received little attention

PLCs generally contain a real-time operating system such as OS-9 or VxWorks and exploits for these

systems exist much as they do for desktop computer operating systems such as Microsoft Windows. PLCs

can also be attacked by gaining control of a computer they communicate with.[9]

Simulation

In order to properly understand the operation of a PLC, it is necessary to spend considerable time

programming, testing, and debugging PLC programs. PLC systems are inherently expensive, and down-

time is often very costly. In addition, if a PLC is programmed incorrectly it can result in lost productivity

and dangerous conditions. PLC simulation software is a valuable tool in the understanding and learning of

PLCs and to keep this knowledge refreshed and up to date. The advantages of using PLC simulation tools

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAMhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debugginghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_programminghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windowshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladder_logichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_virushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instruction_listhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS-9http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_interfacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequential_function_charthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEC_61131-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequential_function_charthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VxWorkshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-to-peerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structured_texthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal_programming_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_computerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_memoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_block_diagramhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet


7/11



Allen-Bradley PLC installed in a

control panel

such as PLCLogix are that they save time in the design of automated control applications and they can also

increase the level of safety associated with equipment since various "what if" scenarios can be tried and

tested before the system is activated.[10]

Redundancy

Some special processes need to work permanently with minimum unwanted down time. Therefore, it is

necessary to design a system which is fault-tolerant and capable of handling the process with faultymodules. In such cases to increase the system availability in the event of hardware component failure,

redundant CPU or I/O modules with the same functionality can be added to hardware configuration for

preventing total or partial process shutdown due to hardware failure.

PLC compared with other control systems

PLCs are well adapted to a range of automation tasks. These are

typically industrial processes in manufacturing where the cost of

developing and maintaining the automation system is high relative to

the total cost of the automation, and where changes to the systemwould be expected during its operational life. PLCs contain input and

output devices compatible with industrial pilot devices and controls;

little electrical design is required, and the design problem centers on

expressing the desired sequence of operations. PLC applications are

typically highly customized systems, so the cost of a packaged PLC is

low compared to the cost of a specific custom-built controller design.

On the other hand, in the case of mass-produced goods, customized

control systems are economical. This is due to the lower cost of the components, which can be optimally

chosen instead of a "generic" solution, and where the non-recurring engineering charges are spread over

thousands or millions of units.

For high volume or very simple fixed automation tasks, different techniques are used. For example, a

consumer dishwasher would be controlled by an electromechanical cam timer costing only a few dollars in

production quantities.

A microcontroller-based design would be appropriate where hundreds or thousands of units will be

produced and so the development cost (design of power supplies, input/output hardware and necessary

testing and certification) can be spread over many sales, and where the end-user would not need to alter th

control. Automotive applications are an example; millions of units are built each year, and very few end-

users alter the programming of these controllers. However, some specialty vehicles such as transit buseseconomically use PLCs instead of custom-designed controls, because the volumes are low and the

development cost would be uneconomical.[11]

Very complex process control, such as used in the chemical industry, may require algorithms and

performance beyond the capability of even high-performance PLCs. Very high-speed or precision controls

may also require customized solutions; for example, aircraft flight controls. Single-board computers using

semi-customized or fully proprietary hardware may be chosen for very demanding control applications

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLCLogixhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-board_computerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dishwasherhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcontrollerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cam_timerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BMA_Automation_Allen_Bradley_PLC_3.JPG


8/11



where the high development and maintenance cost can be supported. "Soft PLCs" running on desktop-type

computers can interface with industrial I/O hardware while executing programs within a version of

commercial operating systems adapted for process control needs.[11]

Programmable controllers are widely used in motion control, positioning control and torque control. Some

manufacturers produce motion control units to be integrated with PLC so that G-code (involving a CNC

machine) can be used to instruct machine movements.

PLCs may include logic for single-variable feedback analog control loop, a proportional, integral,

derivative (PID) controller. A PID loop could be used to control the temperature of a manufacturing

process, for example. Historically PLCs were usually configured with only a few analog control loops;

where processes required hundreds or thousands of loops, a distributed control system (DCS) would instea

be used. As PLCs have become more powerful, the boundary between DCS and PLC applications has

become less distinct.

PLCs have similar functionality as remote terminal units (RTU). An RTU, however, usually does not

support control algorithms or control loops. As hardware rapidly becomes more powerful and cheaper,

RTUs, PLCs and DCSs are increasingly beginning to overlap in responsibilities, and many vendors sell

RTUs with PLC-like features and vice versa. The industry has standardized on the IEC 61131-3 functional block language for creating programs to run on RTUs and PLCs, although nearly all vendors also offer

proprietary alternatives and associated development environments.

In recent years "safety" PLCs have started to become popular, either as standalone models or as

functionality and safety-rated hardware added to existing controller architectures (Allen Bradley

Guardlogix, Siemens F-series etc.). These differ from conventional PLC types as being suitable for use in

safety-critical applications for which PLCs have traditionally been supplemented with hard-wired safety

relays. For example, a safety PLC might be used to control access to a robot cell with trapped-key access,

or perhaps to manage the shutdown response to an emergency stop on a conveyor production line. Such

PLCs typically have a restricted regular instruction set augmented with safety-specific instructions designeto interface with emergency stops, light screens and so forth. The flexibility that such systems offer has

resulted in rapid growth of demand for these controllers.

iscrete and analog signals

Discrete signals behave as binary switches, yielding simply an On or Off signal (1 or 0, True or False,

respectively). Push buttons, Limit switches, and photoelectric sensors are examples of devices providing a

discrete signal. Discrete signals are sent using either voltage or current, where a specific range is designate

as On and another as Off . For example, a PLC might use 24 V DC I/O, with values above 22 V DC

representing On, values below 2VDC representing Off , and intermediate values undefined. Initially, PLCs

had only discrete I/O.

Analog signals are like volume controls, with a range of values between zero and full-scale. These are

typically interpreted as integer values (counts) by the PLC, with various ranges of accuracy depending on

the device and the number of bits available to store the data. As PLCs typically use 16-bit signed binary

processors, the integer values are limited between -32,768 and +32,767. Pressure, temperature, flow, and

weight are often represented by analog signals. Analog signals can use voltage or current with a magnitude

proportional to the value of the process signal. For example, an analog 0 - 10 V input or 4-20 mA would b

converted into an integer value of 0 - 32767.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_control_systemhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_switchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_control_systemhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_terminal_unithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog-to-digital_converterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trapped_key_interlockinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_sensorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_(electricity)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-codehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_(electricity)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PID_controllerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEC_61131-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_terminal_unithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNChttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4-20_mA


9/11



Current inputs are less sensitive to electrical noise (i.e. from welders or electric motor starts) than voltage

inputs.

Example

As an example, say a facility needs to store water in a tank. The water is drawn from the tank by another

system, as needed, and our example system must manage the water level in the tank by controlling the

valve that refills the tank. Shown is a "ladder diagram" which shows the control system. A ladder diagram

is a method of drawing control circuits which pre-dates PLCs. The ladder diagram resembles the schematic

diagram of a system built with electromechanical relays. Shown are:

Two inputs (from the low and high level switches) represented by contacts of the float switches

An output to the fill valve, labelled as the fill valve which it controls

An "internal" contact, representing the output signal to the fill valve which is created in the program

A logical control scheme created by the interconnection of these items in software

In ladder diagram, the contact symbols represent the state of bits in processor memory, which corresponds

to the state of physical inputs to the system. If a discrete input is energized, the memory bit is a 1, and a

"normally open" contact controlled by that bit will pass a logic "true" signal on to the next element of the

ladder. Therefore, the contacts in the PLC program that "read" or look at the physical switch

contacts in this case must be "opposite" or open in order to return a TRUE for the closed physical

switches. Internal status bits, corresponding to the state of discrete outputs, are also available to the

program.

In the example, the physical state of the float switch contacts must be considered when choosing "normally

open" or "normally closed" symbols in the ladder diagram. The PLC has two discrete inputs from float

switches (Low Level and High Level). Both float switches (normally closed) open their contacts when the

water level in the tank is above the physical location of the switch.

When the water level is below both switches, the float switch physical contacts are both closed, and a true

(logic 1) value is passed to the Fill Valve output. Water begins to fill the tank. The internal "Fill Valve"

contact latches the circuit so that even when the "Low Level" contact opens (as the water passes the lower

switch), the fill valve remains on. Since the High Level is also normally closed, water continues to flow as

the water level remains between the two switch levels. Once the water level rises enough so that the "High

Level" switch is off (opened), the PLC will shut the inlet to stop the water from overflowing; this is an

example of seal-in (latching) logic. The output is sealed in until a high level condition breaks the circuit.

After that the fill valve remains off until the level drops so low that the Low Level switch is activated, and

the process repeats again.

| (N.C. physical (N.C. physical || Switch) Switch) || Low Level High Level Fill Valve ||‐‐‐‐‐‐[ ]‐‐‐‐‐‐|‐‐‐‐‐‐[ ]‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐(OUT)‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐|| | || | || | || Fill Valve | ||‐‐‐‐‐‐[ ]‐‐‐‐‐‐| || |

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Float_switchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_loophttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladder_logic


10/11



| |

A complete program may contain thousands of rungs, evaluated in sequence. Typically the PLC processor

will alternately scan all its inputs and update outputs, then evaluate the ladder logic; input changes during a

program scan will not be effective until the next I/O update. A complete program scan may take only a few

milliseconds, much faster than changes in the controlled process.

Programmable controllers vary in their capabilities for a "rung" of a ladder diagram. Some only allow a

single output bit. There are typically limits to the number of series contacts in line, and the number of

branches that can be used. Each element of the rung is evaluated sequentially. If elements change their stat

during evaluation of a rung, hard-to-diagnose faults can be generated, although sometimes (as above) the

technique is useful. Some implementations forced evaluation from left-to-right as displayed and did not

allow reverse flow of a logic signal (in multi-branched rungs) to affect the output.

See also

Industrial control systems

Industrial safety systems

References

1. ^ E. A. Parr, Industrial Control Handbook , Industrial Press Inc., 1999 ISBN 0-8311-3085-7

2. ^ a b M. A. Laughton, D. J. Warne (ed), Electrical Engineer's Reference book, 16th edition,Newnes, 2003

Chapter 16 Programmable Controller

3. ^ "The father of invention: Dick Morley looks back on the 40th anniversary of the PLC"

(http://www.automationmag.com/programable-control/features/the-father-of-invention-dick-morley-looks-back-on-the-40th-anniversary-of-the-plc.html). Manufacturing Automation. 12 September 2008.

4. ^ Harms, Toni M. & Kinner, Russell H. P.E., Enhancing PLC Performance with Vision Systems. 18th Annual

ESD/HMI International Programmable Controllers Conference Proceedings, 1989, p. 387-399.

5. ^ Maher, Michael J. Real-Time Control and Communications. 18th Annual ESD/SMI International

Programmable Controllers Conference Proceedings, 1989, p. 431-436.

6. ^ Kinner, Russell H., P.E. Designing Programable Controller Application Programs Using More than One

Designer . 14th Annual International Programmable Controllers Conference Proceedings, 1985, p. 97-110.

7. ^ a b W. Bolton, Programmable Logic Controllers, Fifth Edition, Newnes, 2009 ISBN 978-1-85617-751-1,

Chapter 1

8. ^ Keller, William L Jr. Grafcet, A Functional Chart for Sequential Processes, 14th Annual International

Programmable Controllers Conference Proceedings, 1984, p. 71-96.

9. ^ [1] (http://www.tofinosecurity.com/blog/plc-security-risk-controller-operating-systems)

10. ^ PLC simulation reference (http://books.google.ca/books?

id=CHYlTBxqrM8C&pg=PA553&dq=plc+simulation+software&hl=en&sa=X&ei=kVAVU-

yDB6OOyAG02oDoAg&ved=0CEIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=plc%20simulation%20software&f=false)

11. ^ a b Gregory K. McMillan, Douglas M. Considine (ed), Process/Industrial Instruments and Controls Handbo

http://books.google.ca/books?id=CHYlTBxqrM8C&pg=PA553&dq=plc+simulation+software&hl=en&sa=X&ei=kVAVU-yDB6OOyAG02oDoAg&ved=0CEIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=plc%20simulation%20software&f=falsehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0831130857http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_control_systemshttp://www.tofinosecurity.com/blog/plc-security-risk-controller-operating-systemshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781856177511http://www.automationmag.com/programable-control/features/the-father-of-invention-dick-morley-looks-back-on-the-40th-anniversary-of-the-plc.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_safety_systems


11/11


Wikiversity has learning

materials about

Programmable logic

controller (basics)

Wikimedia Commons has

media related to

Programmable logiccontroller .

Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1999 ISBN 0-07-012582-1 Section 3 Controllers

Further reading

Daniel Kandray, Programmable Automation Technologies, Industrial Press, 2010 ISBN 978-0-8311

3346-7, Chapter 8 Introduction to Programmable Logic Controllers

External links

PLC Complete Tutorial (http://www.mbcurl.me/6MDE)

PLC FAQ's

(http://support.automationdirect.com/faq/index.html)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Programmable_logic_controller&oldid=645310178"

Categories: Automation Industrial computing

This page was last modified on 2 February 2015, at 14:41.Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms mayapply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is aregistered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_policyhttp://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Programmable_logic_controller_(basics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Categoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Industrial_computinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Automationhttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Programmable_logic_controllerhttp://www.wikimediafoundation.org/http://www.mbcurl.me/6MDEhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Programmable_logic_controller&oldid=645310178http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780831133467http://support.automationdirect.com/faq/index.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0070125821http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Usehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License

programmable logic controller - wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Documents