programme exit survey (pes) dis 2013 session (det) v2
DESCRIPTION
POLITEKNIK KOTA KINABALUTRANSCRIPT
Programme Exit Survey (PES)
Report
Diploma in Electrical Engineering -
DET
December 2013 Session
Politeknik Kota Kinabalu (PKK)
Sabah
RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Member of Advisory Committee
NO NAME POSITION1 Wan Mohamad Nasir bin Wan Abdul Rahman Director2 Zaidi Bin Zakaria Deputy Director (Academic)3 Wan Zain bin Wan Dollah Head of Department (JKE)
Research Fellow (Polytechnic)
NO NAME1 Dr Hasnim bin Harun (Chief, Bureau of Research and Innovation)2 Azman B Talib3 Farah Asyikin Abd Rahman4 Shalizan B. Kadir5 Mohd Mayuzie Yusof6 Fadlilhisham B Ahmad
Research Fellow in Diploma in Electrical Engineering (DET)
NO NAME1 Chin Ken Leong (Head of Program)2 Farah Asyikin Abd Rahman3 Kalaivani A/P Ramachandran
2PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this Programme Exit Survey (PES) was to provide data to gauge perceptions
of various aspects of programmes and services offered and to identify areas where
improvements may be needed in the Department of Electrical Engineering (JKE), Politeknik
Kota Kinabalu (PKK). This PES was conducted on 58 final semester students, graduating
from Diploma in Electronic Engineering (Electric) (DET). They were the third Cohort whose
intake was in December 2013. The survey questionnaire had five main sections: respondents’
profile; assessment of overall quality; assessment of skills and knowledge; assessment of
Lecturers and Academic Advisor; and assessment of academic resources and facilities. All
the data were analysed using the Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) software
version IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0. For the assessment of the overall quality, attribute for
teaching and learning experience was rated 93.1% with “excellent”, “very good” and “good”.
Skills and knowledge section was evaluated by relating the statements with nine items as
stated in the Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO). All the PLOs’ were marked at least
“good” by 97.5% of the students. Assessment on lecturers and academic advisor were rated
33.87% as “excellent” and 44.25% as “very good”. In terms of academic resources and
facilities, the access to Wi-Fi had the highest unsatisfactory concerned from the respondent
whereby 24.1% rated the item as “weak” and 19% as “average”.
Keywords: overall quality, skills and knowledge, lecturer and academic advisor, academic
resources and facilities
3PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Programme Exit Survey (PES)
PES is a method of collecting information on the quality of diploma education from the
perspective of graduating students upon the completion of their diploma programme. This
report refers to an indirect measurement method by way of self-evaluation based on
individual perception for the assessment of PLO. PLOs are the specific statements of
graduates’ knowledge, skills and attitudes acquired at the end of the programme as evidence
for the programme objectives achievements. This PES was conducted to assess the graduate
students’ satisfaction and perceptions about various aspects of their academic experiences.
100% of the final semester students from the DET programme had participated in the survey.
The main objectives of this PES are to:
1) Determine the students perception in their attainment on the overall quality of
learning and teaching in PKK;
2) Determine the students self-assessment of knowledge, skills and soft skills
achievement after going through the PLOs of the programme;
3) Evaluate the students’ opinion towards contributions of Lecturer and Academic
Advisor system implemented based on Outcome Based Education (OBE) approach;
4) Evaluate the students’ opinion towards academic resources and facilities provided in
PKK.
1.2 Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO)
OBE is an educational philosophy that believed that educational assessment should recognise
and reflect progress made by individual students. PLOs are statements that describe what
graduates are expected to know or be able to do on graduation. In the curriculum for DET
programme it has been specified that there are nine (9) PLOs’ to be acquired by the graduates
upon graduation. The nine PLOs are as follows:
i. Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering fundamentals to well
defined electrical and electronic engineering procedures and practices.
ii. Demonstrate practical skills which includes the ability to troubleshoot, repair and do
maintenance work for electrical and electronic equipment
iii. Communicate effectively with the engineering community and the society at large.
4PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
iv. Apply creative and critical thinking in solving problem related to assigned tasks
v. Demonstrate awareness and consideration for societal, health, safety, legal and
cultural issues and consequences responsibilities, taking into account the need for
sustainable development.
vi. Recognize the need for professional development and engage in independent
acquisition of new knowledge and skill.
vii. Recognize the need for entrepreneurship
viii. Demonstrate an understanding of professional ethics, responsibilities and norms of
electrical engineering practices.
ix. Function individually or in teams, effectively, with a capability to be a leader.
2. METHODOLOGY
This survey involved 58 DET students from December 2013 semester. Students were asked
to fill up the PES questionnaires which were posted online and 100% of them responded.
The respondents were required to evaluate and rate themselves based on 5-Likert Scale
indicated below:
1 = Weak
2 = Average
3 = Good
4 = Very Good
5 = Excellent
Student’s satisfaction and acceptance level was determined from the scale. Excellent, Very
Good and Good indication rate shows the students are satisfied with the item. While Average
and Weak indication rate shows the item need some improvements and correction for the
program.
This online survey was conducted between Marchs until May 2014. The survey
questionnaires were divided into five sections as follows:
i. Section A: General Information
ii. Section B: Overall Quality of Teaching and Learning
iii. Section C: Skills and Knowledge
iv. Section D: Contributions of Lecturers and Academic Advisors
v. Section E: Academic Resources and Facilities
5PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
The data collected in this survey was processed through Statistical Product and Service
Solutions (SPSS) software version IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0.
The questionnaires were based on students’ perception on teaching and learning in
PKK, students’ response on skills and knowledge related to PLO’s, students attainment on
the soft skills, students’ rating for lecturers and academic advisors contribution, student’s
opinion towards academic resources, overall services and facilities in PKK. This assessment
strategy was aligned with the Curriculum Development Cycle - “develop-implement-review”
as required by the MQA in order to improve the quality of programme.
3. RESULTS
The response from the students were analysed based on the following four criteria:
i. Students’ response towards the Overall Quality
ii. Students’ response on Skills and Knowledge
iii. Students’ ratings for Lecturer and Academic Advisor contributions
iv. Students’ opinion towards Academic Resources and Facilities
In Section C: (Skills and Knowledge) the statements have been classified under a particular
PLO so that the data analysis can be done appropriately for accreditation purposes. The
results can be used an indicator to show how well the students have acquired their skills and
knowledge as required in the PLOs of the programme.
3.1 SECTION A: PROFILE
Table 1: Student’s Gender
GENDER
Male Female
Qty 51 7(%) 87.9 12.1
6PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
Table 2: Student’s Race
RACE
Melayu Cina India Bumiputera Sabah
Bumiputera Sarawak
Others
Qty 18 4 0 22 12 2(%) 31.0 6.9 0.0 37.9 20.7 3.4
3.2 SECTION B: OVERALL QUALITY
Overall Quality was evaluated by relating the students experience with the teaching and
learning environment in PKK. Two survey statements were given and the results were as
follows:
Table 3: Overall Quality rating
OVERALL QUALITY Weak Average Good Very Good Excellent
What is your impression on the overall quality of curriculum; and teaching and learning at PKK?
1 1 20 23 13
(%) 1.7 1.7 34.5 39.7 22.4
To what extent has the quality of teaching and learning in PKK improved since you were here?
0 4 19 25 10
(%) 0.0 6.9 32.8 43.1 17.2
3.2.1 PLO 1 (Knowledge)
For PLO 1 (Knowledge), four statements were given and the results were as follows:
7PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
Table 4: PLO 1 Knowledge rating
SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGEPLO 1 (Knowledge)
Weak Average Good Very Good Excellent
I am able to apply knowledge of core discipline courses in my programme
0 4 13 30 11
(%) 0.0 6.9 22.4 51.7 19.0I am able to apply knowledge of specialized courses in my programme
0 3 19 25 11
(%) 0.0 5.2 32.8 43.1 19.0I am able to apply knowledge of elective courses in my programme
0 3 19 27 9
(%) 0.0 5.2 32.8 46.6 15.5
I am able to understand the technological applications relevant to my programme of study
0 2 14 30 12
(%) 0.0 3.4 24.1 51.7 20.7
3.2.2 PLO 2 (Technical & Practical Skills)
For PLO 2 (Technical & Practical Skills), three statements were given and the results were as
follows:
Table 5: PLO 2 Technical & Practical Skills rating
SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGEPLO 2 (Technical & Practical Skills)
Weak Average Good Very Good ExcellentI am able to apply information technology in my programme
0 1 17 30 10
(%) 0.0 1.7 29.3 51.7 17.2
I am able to demonstrate my practical skills effectively
1 1 15 30 11
(%) 1.7 1.7 25.9 51.7 19.0I am able to use computing technology for applications in my programme
0 2 20 25 11
(%) 0.0 3.4 34.5 43.1 19.0
8PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
3.2.3 PLO 3 (Communication Skills)
For PLO 3 (Communication Skills), three statements were provided and the results were as
follows:
Table 6: PLO 3 Communication Skills rating
SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGEPLO 3 (Communication Skills)
Weak Average Good Very Good Excellent
I am able to communicate effectively orally/visually (informal / formal / conversational / presentation)
0 2 12 30 14
(%) 0.0 3.4 20.7 51.7 24.1
I am able to communicate effectively in writing (writing reports and expressing ideas and opinions clearly and concisely)
0 1 12 33 12
(%) 0.0 1.7 20.7 56.9 20.7
I am able to use computing technology in communications
0 3 16 26 13
(%) 0.0 5.2 27.6 44.8 22.4
3.2.4 PLO 4 (Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skills)
For PLO 4 (Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skills), three statements were given and the
results were as follows:
9PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
Table 7: PLO 4 Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skills rating
SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGEPLO 4 (Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skills)
Weak Average Good Very Good Excellent
I am able to solve problems using methods, tools and skills related to my programme
0 3 14 32 9
(%) 0.0 5.2 24.1 55.2 15.5I am able to think critically and logically
0 0 10 36 12
(%) 0.0 0.0 17.2 62.1 20.7I am able to plan, organize and complete a task
0 0 11 35 12
(%) 0.0 0.0 19.0 60.3 20.7
3.2.5 PLO 5 (Social Skills and Responsibilities)
For PLO 5 (Social Skills and Responsibilities), three statements were given and the results
were as follows:
Table 8: PLO 5 Social Skills and Responsibilities rating
SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGEPLO 5 (Social Skills and Responsibilities)
Weak Average Good Very Good Excellent
I am able to understand the role of my work in relation to social or cultural issues
1 0 12 31 14
(%) 1.7 0.0 20.7 53.4 24.1
I am aware of the value of considering diversity and differences in cultures in my work
0 0 14 26 18
(%) 0.0 0.0 24.1 44.8 31.0I am aware of the impact of my work in a social context
0 3 12 31 12
(%) 0.0 5.2 20.7 53.4 20.7
10PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
3.2.6 PLO 6 (Continuous Learning & Information Management Skills)
For PLO 6 (Continuous Learning & Information Management Skills), four statements were
provided and the results were as follows:
Table 9: PLO 6 Continuous Learning & Information Management Skills rating
SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGEPLO 6 (Continuous Learning & Information Management Skills) Weak Average Good Very Good Excellent
I am able to continuously learn new skills and knowledge
1 0 9 23 25
(%) 1.7 0.0 15.5 39.7 43.1I am able to engage in continuous learning beyond the classroom
0 0 10 32 16
(%) 0.0 0.0 17.2 55.2 27.6I am able to learn and apply new concepts
0 0 12 30 16
(%) 0.0 0.0 20.7 51.7 27.6
I am able to use information resources (databases, libraries, internet etc)
0 3 15 23 17
(%) 0.0 5.2 25.9 39.7 29.3
3.2.7 PLO 7 (Management & Entrepreneurial Skills)
For PLO 7 (Management & Entrepreneurial Skills), two statements were provided and the
results were as follows:
Table 10: PLO 7 Management & Entrepreneurial Skills rating
SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGEPLO 7 (Management & Entrepreneurial Skills)
Weak Average Good Very Good ExcellentI am able to build/develop my career upon completion of my studies
0 2 17 26 13
(%) 0.0 3.4 29.3 44.8 22.4I am able to develop time management skills
0 0 19 29 10
(%) 0.0 0.0 32.8 50.0 17.2
11PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
3.2.8 PLO 8 (Professionalism, Ethics & Moral)
For PLO 8 (Professionalism, Ethics & Moral), two statements were provided and the results
were as follows:
Table 11: PLO 8 Professionalism, Ethics & Moral rating
SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGEPLO 8 (Professionalism, Ethics & Moral)
Weak Average Good Very Good Excellent
I am able to understand the professional and ethical responsibilities related to my work
0 0 20 24 14
(%) 0.0 0.0 34.5 41.4 24.1I am aware of the importance of safety issues related to my work
0 0 9 29 20
(%) 0.0 0.0 15.5 50.0 34.5
3.2.9 PLO 9 (Leadership & Teamwork Skills)
For assessment of the PLO 9 (Leadership & Teamwork Skills), four statements were
provided and the results were as follows:
Table 12: PLO 9 Leadership & Teamwork Skills rating
SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGEPLO 9 (Leadership & Teamwork Skills)
Weak Average Good Very Good ExcellentI am able to work with individuals from different backgrounds
0 0 12 24 22
(%) 0.0 0.0 20.7 41.4 37.9
I am able to work successfully as a member of a team
0 0 11 25 22
(%) 0.0 0.0 19.0 43.1 37.9
I am able to work successfully as a leader of a team
0 0 19 25 14
(%) 0.0 0.0 32.8 43.1 24.1I am able to function in multidisciplinary teams
0 0 14 25 19
(%) 0.0 0.0 24.1 43.1 32.8
12PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
3.3 SECTION D: CONTRIBUTIONS OF LECTURERS AND ACADEMIC
ADVISORS
Responses from students towards the lecturers and academic advisors’ contributions are
summarized below. Graduates were asked to offer insights of encouragement given into the
programme delivery process. Six attributes of encouragement were offered and the results
were as follows:
Table 13: Contributions of Lecturers and Academic Advisors rating
CONTRIBUTIONSContributions of Lecturers and Academic Advisors
To what extent did your lecturer/academic advisor encourage you to:
Weak Average Good Very Good Excellent
Set high expectations for learning?
0 0 15 22 21
(%) 0.0 0.0 25.9 37.9 36.2
Be an actively involved learner? 0 1 9 30 18
(%) 0.0 1.7 15.5 51.7 31.0Show concern for student learning?
0 0 12 25 21
(%) 0.0 0.0 20.7 43.1 36.2Provide feedback frequently and promptly?
0 0 14 24 20
(%) 0.0 0.0 24.1 41.4 34.5Show concern for student learning?
0 1 12 28 17
(%) 0.0 1.7 20.7 48.3 29.3Provide feedback frequently and promptly?
0 1 11 25 21
(%) 0.0 1.7 19.0 43.1 36.2
3.4 SECTION E: ACADEMIC RESOURCES/FACILITIES
In the education eco-system, academic resources/facilities were important in terms of
educational hardware. The teaching and learning process would be greatly enhanced provided
that there were sufficient resources/facilities for students to thrive academically. Table 4
shows the percentage of respondents’ ratings towards the sufficiency of resources/facilities at
the PKK. Eleven statements of resources/facilities were given and the results were as follows:
13PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
Table 14: Academic Resources/Facilities rating
ACADEMIC RESOURCES/FACILITIES
To what extent did Politeknik Kota Kinabalu provide you with the following resources/facilities?
Weak Average Good Very Good Excellent
Operation hours of the library
3 4 20 24 7
(%) 5.2 6.9 34.5 41.4 12.1
Access to databases and collections both physically and online in the library
2 6 22 21 7
(%) 3.4 10.3 37.9 36.2 12.1Easy and responsive services of the HEP staff
3 7 20 24 4
(%) 5.2 12.1 34.5 41.4 6.9
Easy and responsive services of the counselling staff
3 6 19 24 6
(%) 5.2 10.3 32.8 41.4 10.3
Easy and responsive services of the library staff
4 4 21 22 7
(%) 6.9 6.9 36.2 37.9 12.1
Easy and responsive services of the administration staff
3 6 20 24 5
(%) 5.2 10.3 34.5 41.4 8.6Access to Wi-Fi internet 14 11 20 11 2
(%) 24.1 19.0 34.5 19.0 3.4Quality of computer labs 8 8 23 15 4
(%) 13.8 13.8 39.7 25.9 6.9Quality of laboratories / workshops / kitchens
8 7 24 15 4
(%) 13.8 12.1 41.4 25.9 6.9Quality of classrooms 8 4 22 19 5
(%) 13.8 6.9 37.9 32.8 8.6Quality of sports and recreational facilities
11 4 22 18 3
(%) 19.0 6.9 37.9 31.0 5.2
4. SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS FROM STUDENTS
wifi kurang memuaskan di kawasan Politeknik Kota Kinabalu
14PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
Dapat membaik pulih bilik kuliah dan makmal.
membaiki sistem pembelajaran yang berkesan dan efektif
DAPAT MENYEDIAKAN KELENGKAPAN DI MAKMAL
membaiki sistem pembelajaran dan membaik pulih infrastruktur politeknik kota
kinabalu.
menambahbaikan kualiti WI-FI di setiap jabatan. supaya menyenangkan pelajar
mencari maklumat untuk kuliah.
"-menyediakan wifi untuk kemudahan mencari maklumat para pelajar terutamanya d
tempat2 rehat,cafe,gerai tetapi hendaklah dikawal dengan rapi.
-mendedahkan pelajar dengan riadah petang seperti membuat program ""hidup sihat
dengan joging""
Sikap pensyarah yg terlalu memandang rendah terhadap pelajar,sila benarkan pelajar
mengasah bakat yg ada dan bukannya memberi komen yang mematikan bakat yang
ada.YANG PENTING JANGAN PANDANG RENDAH TERHADAP PROJECT
STUDENT!
-perlukan wifi free di setiap jabatan untuk memudahkan pelajar mencari maklumat.
May this Polytechnic keep moving forward and improving in every aspects....
kasi bagus wifi library.. supaya sanang durang pakai nanti.. banyak wifi d poli tapi
sikit2 ja yang buli gia.. aiya.. tapi overall okey la juga.. kalo kasi rating.. 8/10 la.. best
ba d poli.. tp ckup la 3 tahun ja.. hehe..:3
politeknik should provide more facilities and experiences lesson to thier student to
make their student get better visionof their studies.
the facilities & quality still needs improving...so that PKK can compete with the
standards of universities....
berikan kemudahan makmal yang lebih lengkap dan pastikan setiap barang di makmal
dikemaskini dan direkod setiap minggu untuk mengenal pasti kualiti barangan
makmal
saya sebagai pelajar politeknik mencadangkan agar melakukan penyelenggaraan di
bengkel/makmal..terutama component ketika membuat lab work dan upgrade
peralatan yang sepatutnya untuk mendedahkan kami kepada benda baru.
Menyediakan kemudahan perkakasan untuk pelajar membuat kerja-kerja
amali.contohnya untuk kursus EC602 COMPUTER SYSTEM DIAGNOSIS AND
MAINTENANCE.
everything is good, but i think it can be better.
15PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)
Menyediakan jalan yang beratap dari kamsis hingga jabatan-jabatan bagi keselesaan
dan kemudahan pelajar apabila hendak ke kelas!.
Kalau boleh,cuba contohi politeknik lain.Walaupun tidak strict sgt,tpi mereka dapat
mencapai prestasi yang tinggi di samping disiplin yg tinggi...
TERIMA KASIH..:)
goodluck FINAL EXAM 😁👍
harap hubungan antara pensyarah dan pelajar berkaitan subjek yang diajar sentiasa
dipertingkatkan,khususnya pensyarah harap aktif di Cidos, supaya pelajar dapat
mengetahui perkembangan terkini..eheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheh.
Good
Agar Politeknik Kota Kinabalu akan menaik tarafkan menjadi Politeknik Premier di
masa akan datang.
Membuat laluan pejalan kaki ber bumbung dri pintu utama ke bangunan akademik..
Teruskan usaha dalam meningkatkan perkhidmatan
16PKK Program Exit Survey Report December 2013 Session (DET)