project 3: spatial verification of precipitation over the alps during … · 2017. 7. 11. ·...

11
Observaons: Vienna Enhanced Resoluon Analysis (VERA) Interpolaon of observaons to a regular grid in mountainous terrain Models: Swiss COSMO-2 model Canadian Meteorological Centre CMCGEMH (outdated version) Domain: Project 3: Spaal verificaon of precipitaon over the Alps during MesoVICT-I Alvarez, Mao, Miesner, Petersen, Willemet

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Observations: • Vienna Enhanced Resolution Analysis (VERA) • Interpolation of observations to a regular grid in mountainous terrain

    Models: • Swiss COSMO-2 model • Canadian Meteorological Centre CMCGEMH (outdated version)

    Domain:

    Project 3: Spatial verification of precipitation over the Alps during MesoVICT-I

    Alvarez, Mao, Miesner, Petersen, Willemet

  • Methods (I): Fraction Skill Score

    Answers the question “What are the spatial scales at which the forecast resembles the observations?

    • How forecast skill varies with neighbourhood size• The smallest neighbourhood size that can be used to give sufficiently accurate

    forecasts• Do higher resolution NWP provide more accurate forecasts on scales of interest

    Target skill

    CAWR.gov.au/projects/verification

    1

    0.5 chosen

  • Methods (II): Contiguous Rain Areas (CRA)

    Answers the question “What is the location error of the (spatial) forecast, and how does the total error break down into components due to incorrect location, volume, and fine scale structure?”

    Observed Forecast

    Users choose • threshold to define objects [1mm/h], and• pattern-matching function [R-verification package default]

    CAWR.gov.au/projects/verification

  • Evening 8th

    Summer convective situation in the northern Alpine in August 2007

    mesoVICT whitepaper

    Night 6/7th Evening 7th

  • OBSERVATIONS

    19 UTC 07/08/2017Lead: 13 hours

    1 2 5 10

    (mm/h) Neighborhood size (grid squares)

    1 25

    Field resolution: 8 km

    Nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d siz

    e

    FSS

    Fractions Skill Score (FSS)

    1 2 5 10

    (mm/h)

    No skill !

    Neighborhood size (grid squares)

    Nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d siz

    e FSS

    Fractions Skill Score (FSS)

  • OBSERVATIONS

    No matches in CRA

    Dominant components of the errors are displacement and pattern errors

    19 UTC 07/08/2017Lead: 13 hours

    ErrorDisplacement 61 % -8 % Volume 0% 1 %Pattern 40% 107 %

  • OBSERVATIONS

    10 UTC 08/08/2017Lead: 4 hours

    1 2 5 10

    (mm/h) Neighborhood size (grid squares)

    1 25

    Nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d siz

    e

    FSS

    Fractions Skill Score (FSS)

    1 2 5 10

    (mm/h) Neighborhood size (grid squares)

    Nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d siz

    e FSS

    Fractions Skill Score (FSS)

  • OBSERVATIONS

    Dominant components of the errors are displacement and pattern errors

    10 UTC 08/08/2017Lead: 4 hours

    aab

    bcc

  • OBSERVATIONS

    14 UTC 08/08/2017Lead: 8 hours

    1 2 5 10

    (mm/h) Neighborhood size (grid squares)

    1 25

    Nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d siz

    e

    FSS

    Fractions Skill Score (FSS)

    1 2 5 10

    (mm/h) Neighborhood size (grid squares)

    Nei

    ghbo

    rhoo

    d siz

    e FSS

    Fractions Skill Score (FSS)

  • 14 UTC 08/08/2017Lead: 8 hours

    OBSERVATIONS

    Dominant components of the errors are displacement and pattern errors

    a ab

    b

  • Conclusions

    • Applying several forecast verification metric is recommended !

    FSS• Showed how skill varies with neighborhood size • Varying skill for different rainfall thresholds and over time

    CRA• Strength: error decomposed into

    Displacement Volume Pattern

    • Weakness: pattern matching function and threshold must be carefully chosen default might not suffice

    Folie 1Folie 2Folie 3Folie 4Folie 5Folie 6Folie 7Folie 8Folie 9Folie 10Folie 11