project feasibility analysis in engg. economics
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
1/21
ENGINEERING ECONOMICS
FINAL COURSE PRESENTATION
PRESENTED BY:
Pramod Thapa 064bme625Susheel Regmi 064bme646
Umanga Bhattarai 064bme647Utsav S. Rajbhandari 064bme648
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
2/21
p r e p a r e d b y : -
& D Solar Solut ions PROJECT FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
UPSS NGINEERI NG SOUTIONS NGINEE RING SOUTIONS
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
3/21
Problem statement
R&D solar solutions that manufactures solar heating equipment, namely improved solar water heater. The initial investment is Rs.70 lakhs. The production target is 250
units per year till the service life of 10 years. During these years, it would invest in
R&D. At the end of year 6, additional Rs.5lakhs,in bulk is, invested for R&D. After
its current service life, the continuation would be based in the progress by the R&D.The land is on rent while other fixed assets are the capital investment. With the
assumption of escalation rate of 5%, the depreciation for building and machinery to
be 15% and 25% respectively. The annual insurance cost is 2.5% . The revenue per
unit production for the first year is Rs50,000 and it will increase by 5% each year
thereafter. The MARR of the company is assumed to be 15%
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
4/21
OBJECTIVES
To make the engineering economic analysis using Project Evaluation Technique
To Develop a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model for the project and find out whether
the project is feasible or not.
To check out whether the project can be carried out further along with R&D.
To find out the IRR for the project.
To find the payback period of the project
The non-commercial objective of this project is to replace diesel and kerosene burning
water boilers in various industries and household purposes in Nepal with high
efficiency solar water heaters to reduce imported fossil fuel use and related GHG
emissions
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
5/21
METHODOLOGY
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
6/21
Methodology (continued)
Analysis Tools used:Discounted Payback PeriodNet Present Value
Annual Equivalent ValueInternal Rate Of Return
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
7/21
Discounted Payback period
Payback period is the time needed to recover theinitial investment by the net cash flows produced by the investment.
But it doesnt show the profit.
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
8/21
NPV
Present worth (PW) is an equivalent cash flow at present, generally att =0, to all the cash flows associated with a project.
NPV =A i (P/F, i, n) NPV =A i (P/F, i, n)
If NPV > 0, accept the investmentIf NPV = 0, remain indifferentIf NPV< 0, reject the investment.
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
9/21
AEV
It is measurement of investment on equal paymentannual basis.
AE(i)=PW(i)(A/P,I,N)
If AE>0, accept the projectIf AE =0, remain indifferentIf AE
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
10/21
IRR
Internal rate of return (IRR) of a project is the interestrate, i, which makes PW(i) = 0.
Methods of project Evaluation by IRR If IRR>MARR, accept the projectIf IRR = MARR, remain indifferentIf IRR < MARR, reject the project
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
11/21
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
12/21
Capital Costs
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
13/21
Annual Expenditures
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
14/21
Revenue
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
15/21
Project Cash Flow
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
16/21
Project evaluation techniques
We have used following method for project evaluation:
Payback period:Between 5 th and 6 th year
Net Present Value (NPV):PW(15%)=Rs. 5143000
Annual equivalent value: AE(15%)=Rs. 1025000
Internal rate of return:IRR=28%
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
17/21
Payback Period
Discounted payback periodyear Cash flow % cash cumulative
0 -7000 0 -7000
1 1445 -1050 -6605
2 1758 -991 -5838
3 2040 -876 -4673
4 2302 -701 -3072
5 2549 -461 -984
6 2285 -148 1153
7 3016 173 4342
8 3348 651 8341
9 3664 1251 13256
10 3862 1988 19107
Payback period is between 5 th and 6 th year Very attractive for a company
which is planning furtherexpansion in future.
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
18/21
NPV and AEV
NPV: Assume, MARR=15%=iFor our project,
NPV(15%)= A i (P/F, i, n) =Rs. 5143000
As, NPV is +ve, so we accept project
AEV: AE(15%)=Rs. 1025000
Attractive Annual income
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
19/21
IRR NPV Profile
year Cash Flow Discount rate NPV 0 -7000 0%19,268
1 1445 5%12,471
2 1758 10%7,896
3 2040 15%4,723
4 2302 20%2,459
5 2549 25%803
6 2285 30%(437)
7 3016 35%(1,386)
8 3348 40%(2,127)
9 3664 45%(2,715)
10 3862 50%(3,190)
IRR = 28% Very attractive for investors
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
20/21
CONCLUSION
v The project is feasible and is profitable.
v Investment on R&D is also feasible.
v The project can be even carried out further after the
projected life based on the progress report from R&D.
v The payback period is very good.
v The IRR is attractive enough to attract any investor, if
required.
-
8/8/2019 Project Feasibility Analysis in Engg. Economics
21/21
THANK YOU ! ! !