propagation of partially coherent light in optical systemsgross/... · 2016. 11. 28. ·...

15
www.iap.uni-jena.de Propagation of partially coherent light in optical systems Minyi Zhong a , Herbert Gross a,b a Institute of Applied Physics, University of Jena b Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Optics and Precision Engineering IOF, Jena

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • www.iap.uni-jena.de

    Propagation of partially coherent light

    in optical systems

    Minyi Zhong a, Herbert Gross a,b

    a Institute of Applied Physics, University of Jena

    b Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Optics and Precision Engineering IOF, Jena

  • 1

    Optical communications

    Optical tomography

    Photolithography

    Figures from apcmag.com; lickr.com; elprocus.com

    Applications of partially coherent light

    Microscopy

  • 2

    Goal of our work: to investigate modeling methods to propagate

    partially coherent light through various optical components.

    Contents of this talk:

    1. Introduction

    2. Propagation method 1: phase space

    3. Propagation method 2: modal expansion

    4. Conclusions

    Contents

  • 3

    Introduction to partial coherence

    Complete

    incoherence:

    Complete

    coherence: He-Ne laser

    Patial coherence

    in space:

    Correlation function: 𝛤 𝑟1, 𝑟2 = 𝐸∗ 𝑟1 𝐸(𝑟2)

    Normalized 𝛤 between 0 and 1: degree of coherence

  • 4

    Method 1: phase space – introduction

    Pointsource:

    Partially coherent source:

    x

    z

    Rays

    Diffraction

    x

    u

    Δu

    x

    I

    local Poynting vector 𝑆

    Integration over u axis

    x

    z

    Δu

    x(position)

    u (angle)

    x u

    x

    u

    Real space: Phase space:

    xo

    xo

  • Definition:

    𝑊 𝑥, 𝑢 = 𝛤 𝑥 +∆𝑥

    2, 𝑥 −

    ∆𝑥

    2exp −𝑖

    2𝜋

    λ𝑢∆𝑥 d∆𝑥

    5

    Negative values indicate destructive interference, thus useful for analyzing diffractive

    components.

    Method 1: phase space – Wigner function

    Double

    slits:Phase

    space:

    x

    u

    Paraxial propagation – coordinate transform:

    𝑥𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑜𝑢𝑡

    =𝐴 𝐵𝐶 𝐷

    𝑥𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑛

    𝑊𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑥𝑜𝑢𝑡 , 𝑢𝑜𝑢𝑡 = 𝑊𝑖𝑛 𝐴𝑥𝑖𝑛 + 𝐵𝑢𝑖𝑛, 𝐶𝑥𝑖𝑛 + 𝐷𝑢𝑖𝑛

    (Reference: Testorf, Phase-Space Optics, 2006)

  • 6

    Method 1: phase space – diffractive elements

    x (mm)

    ∆𝑧

    ∆𝜑 = 𝑛 − 1∆𝑧

    λ

    a) Surfaces with discontinuity in space:

    ii. Two steps:

    ∆𝑧

    Δ𝜑 = 5.5

    i. Step phase:

  • 7

    sin u = mλ/d

    𝑑

    ∆𝑧

    iii. Grating: iv. Kinoform lens:

    Δ𝜑 = 5.5

    Method 1: phase space – diffractive elements

    a) Surfaces with discontinuity in space:

    Phase space right behind the element:

    Phase space right behind the element:

    Δ𝜑 = 1.4

  • 8

    Method 1: phase space – diffractive elements

    b) Surfaces with discontinuity in slope:

    i. Axicon: ii. Lens array:

    Phase space at 𝑧 = 0 𝑚𝑚: Phase space at plane A:Phase space at plane B:Phase space at plane C:

  • 9

    Method 1: phase space – summary

    Advantages: 1) Visualizing light in positions and angles,

    2) Paraxial propagation with ABCD matrices,

    3) Combining ray optics and wave optics, diffraction effects

    included.

    Disadvantages: 1) Non-paraxial propagation is more complicated,

    2) For light with two transverse dimensions, we need a 4D

    Wigner function,

    3) components beyond thin element approximation, e.g.

    waveguides.

  • 10

    Method 2: modal expansion – introduction

    • A partially coherent beam = an incoherent sum of modes.

    • Each mode is a coherent beam.

    • No interference between every two modes.

    • 𝛤 𝑟1, 𝑟2 = 𝑛 λ𝑛𝜙𝑛∗ 𝑟1 𝜙𝑛 (𝑟2)

    Orthogonal modes: Non-orthogonal modes:

  • 11

    Method 2: modal expansion – waveguide

    a) Slab waveguide with a step-index profile:

    • Gibbs phenomenon: flat-top profile unachievable with finite modes, even at a larger propagation distance.

    • Waveguide: always finite modes.

    Transverse intensity @ z = 2000 mm

    Phase space at 𝑧 = 1 𝑚𝑚 Phase space at 𝑧 = 6 𝑚𝑚

  • 12

    b) waveguide with a parabolic-index profile:

    Method 2: modal expansion – waveguide

    Ray paths in Zemax: (𝑧 = 70 𝑚𝑚, Gaussian apodization)

    Influence of partial coherence on FWHM of the focus:

    Gaussian-Schell beam (waist 150 µm, correlation length 50 µm)

    Coherent Gaussian beam:FWHM 18 µm at focus

    𝑧 = 15.7 𝑚𝑚

    𝑧 = 15.7 𝑚𝑚

  • 13

    Conclusions about two modeling methods

    Phase space Modal expansion

    Optical effects Visualization of ray optics and wave

    optics, especially diffraction effects.

    Direct solution to the complex fields

    of each mode.

    Propagation Paraxial: ABCD matrix,

    Nonparaxial: Helmholtz wave fields.

    Wave propagation for each mode,

    paraxially or non-paraxially.

    Optical

    components

    Convenient with thin element

    approximation, e.g. discontinuous

    surfaces.

    Suitable for components beyond

    thin-element approximation, e.g.

    waveguides

    Computer memory 4D data for two transverse

    dimensions: 𝑊(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑢, 𝑣).

    3D data for two transverse

    dimensions: 𝜙𝑛(𝑥, 𝑦).

  • 14