proposal to modify the northeast boundary of · pdf fileproposal to modify the northeast...

8
Proposal to modify the northeast boundary of the Eel River EFH no-trawl area Date: April 28, 2009 Applicant: Peter Leipzig Executive Director Fishermen’s Marketing Association 1585 Heartwood Dr. Suite E McKinleyville, CA 95519 707-840-0182 [email protected] Problem: At the time that the PFMC was adopting the specific EFH closures, there were at least two sets of competing proposals for specific areas to be closed for trawling. One had been developed by the fishing industry with considerable input throughout the industry and another was developed by Oceana with input from other environmental organizations. There was a concerted effort by both parties to combine the two proposals the evening prior to the action taken by the Council. One area that was that was contained within both these two sets of proposals was a large area in the Eel River Canyon. The motion passed by the Council combined the two proposals. The western portion of the Industry proposal (attachment 1) was combined with the Eastern half of the area as proposed by Oceana (attachment 2). The Oceana proposal covered a broader area of the canyon and extended much further onshore into shallow water. This combination resulted in the adopted Eel River EFH no-trawl area (attachment 3). This proposal is to move the eastern boundary of the Eel River EFH area to the west so that it conforms to the existing 75 fm RCA boundary (attachment 4). In this area being proposed to be changed, Oceana had identified an area as being untrawlable. This is not the case. There is a sunken barge in the area which can cause problems for research vessels, but local fishermen have fished this area without problems for many years. Given the immense size of the entire EFH process, little attention was given to the exact location of the boundaries of the proposed closure of the Eel River Canyon as proposed by Oceana. Further, there was no opportunity to respond to the blending of the two proposals as occurred in the motion.

Upload: truongduong

Post on 19-Mar-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Proposal to modify the northeast boundary of · PDF fileProposal to modify the northeast boundary of the Eel River EFH no-trawl area Date: ... NOBELTEC Visual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

Proposal to modify the northeast boundary of the Eel River EFH no-trawl area

Date: April 28, 2009 Applicant: Peter Leipzig

Executive Director Fishermen’s Marketing Association 1585 Heartwood Dr. Suite E McKinleyville, CA 95519

707-840-0182 [email protected]

Problem: At the time that the PFMC was adopting the specific EFH closures, there

were at least two sets of competing proposals for specific areas to be closed for trawling. One had been developed by the fishing industry with considerable input throughout the industry and another was developed by Oceana with input from other environmental organizations. There was a concerted effort by both parties to combine the two proposals the evening prior to the action taken by the Council.

One area that was that was contained within both these two sets of

proposals was a large area in the Eel River Canyon. The motion passed by the Council combined the two proposals. The western portion of the Industry proposal (attachment 1) was combined with the Eastern half of the area as proposed by Oceana (attachment 2). The Oceana proposal covered a broader area of the canyon and extended much further onshore into shallow water. This combination resulted in the adopted Eel River EFH no-trawl area (attachment 3).

This proposal is to move the eastern boundary of the Eel River EFH area to the west so that it conforms to the existing 75 fm RCA boundary (attachment 4). In this area being proposed to be changed, Oceana had identified an area as being untrawlable. This is not the case. There is a sunken barge in the area which can cause problems for research vessels, but local fishermen have fished this area without problems for many years.

Given the immense size of the entire EFH process, little attention was

given to the exact location of the boundaries of the proposed closure of the Eel River Canyon as proposed by Oceana. Further, there was no opportunity to respond to the blending of the two proposals as occurred in the motion.

Page 2: Proposal to modify the northeast boundary of · PDF fileProposal to modify the northeast boundary of the Eel River EFH no-trawl area Date: ... NOBELTEC Visual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

The adopted closure cut off the tows by trawlers fishing on the beach on sandy bottom in shallow water.

Why warranted:

This slight modification of the Eel River closure would allows trawlers to once again tow for flatfish on the beach in shallow water over flat sandy bottom. The use of the existing RCA boundary would continue restrict trawling in the Eel River canyon, but would greatly minimize the enforcement of the boundary by eliminating multiple sets of closure boundaries. This modification would continue to provide protection to the Eel River Canyon while at the same time restoring the shallow water area to trawlers that have lost access to nearshore flatfish in the area because the closure. The closed area is located midway through existing tows. The remaining segments of the tows are too small to be accessed separately. The loss of this area has had negative economic impacts upon the small beach trawlers operating out of Eureka and restoring the area would not jeopardize the protections of the Eel River Canyon. Delaying action until the five year review is therefore not warranted.

Proposed Action:

Move eastern waypoints to conform to the 75 fms RCA boundary (attachment 5). The resulting coordinates for the Eel River EFH area would be as follows:

Original Boundary Proposed Boundary Point # Longitude Latitude Point # Longitude Latitude

1 40 38.270 N 124 27.160 W 1 40 38.750 N 124 29.214 W 2 40 35.600 N 124 28.750 W 2 40 37.500 N 124 28.680 W

3 40 35.806 N 124 29.214 W 3 40 37.520 N 124 33.410 W 4 40 37.520 N 124 33.410 W 4 40 37.470 N 124 40.460 W 5 40 37.470 N 124 40.460 W 5 40 35.470 N 124 42.970 W 6 40 35.470 N 124 42.970 W 6 40 32.780 N 124 44.790 W 7 40 32.780 N 124 44.790 W 7 40 24.320 N 124 39.970 W 8 40 24.320 N 124 39.970 W 8 40 23.260 N 124 42.450 W 9 40 23.260 N 124 42.450 W 9 40 27.340 N 124 51.210 W 10 40 27.340 N 124 51.210 W

10 40 32.680 N 125 5.630 W 11 40 32.680 N 125 5.630 W 11 40 49.120 N 124 47.410 W 12 40 49.120 N 124 47.410 W 12 40 44.320 N 124 46.480 W 13 40 44.320 N 124 46.480 W 13 40 40.750 N 124 47.510 W 14 40 40.750 N 124 47.510 W 14 40 40.650 N 124 46.020 W 15 40 40.650 N 124 46.020 W 15 40 39.690 N 124 33.360 W 16 40 39.690 N 124 33.360 W 16 40 38.270 N. 124 27.160 W. 17 40 38.750 N. 124 29.214 W.

Page 3: Proposal to modify the northeast boundary of · PDF fileProposal to modify the northeast boundary of the Eel River EFH no-trawl area Date: ... NOBELTEC Visual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

Relevant and Applicable Information:

The area that would be opened to trawling is a sandy bottom habitat similar to the area further east as well as to the north and south. The area important for the trawling of English sole, Petrale sole, Dover sole, and other nearshore flatfish. There are roughly three trawlers fishing out of the port of Eureka that have been prevented from fishing in this area. These are smaller vessels common referred to as “beach boats”.

Discussion:

This area is the flat sandy bottom area above the Eel River Canyon. This is the area where flatfish that are undergoing their season migration from deeper water will travel to reach shallower areas on the continental shelf. This is an important area to fishermen fishing for nearshore flatfish. The habitat type is similar to most of the sandy bottom continental shelf; however, the closed area divides historic tow locations into halves. Each of these remaining portions are so small that the entire area north and south of the closed area has become economically inefficient to trawling. Opening the relative small closed area will allow a much larger area to once again be economical to be fished. This area is not known to be vulnerable to the effects of fishing and contains no unique, rare, or threatened habitat. Opening this area is will not have a huge impact upon the value of fisheries as a whole, but to the few fishermen that historically fished through this area, the economic benefit of the modification would be tremendous.

Page 4: Proposal to modify the northeast boundary of · PDF fileProposal to modify the northeast boundary of the Eel River EFH no-trawl area Date: ... NOBELTEC Visual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

NOBELTECVisual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

Blunts

F

Reef

(1980)

C

M

rky

M

rky

441 2571433 2001648

293372

342 126673 2651636 13291618

61385

279 168

1264 5931563

284

72 37686 448

1492

1373369 75 39

582 231406

478

525 85 251388

384604 438

132933

141454 753 1141455 288

740

79233

1252 32 22

1493 5961443 77 16

152 62 45 291294

2043152

1120 4113931372 554 14

321170

54

4 1199 44162

1173949 262

17

710655 813 211 39717

530 632

178482 610166 213645 334

137 78325 45

FlW FlW FlW FlW FlW

Fl(4)W 20sFl(4)W 20sFl(4)W 20sFl(4)W 20sFl(4)W 20s

FlR 2sFlR 2sFlR 2sFlR 2sFlR 2s

N

1717

016016

015015014014

013013

012012

011011

010010

009009

008008

007007

006006

005005

004004003003

002002

001001

Nobeltec software™ - Copyright © 1995-2005 Nobeltec Corporation (800-946-2877)DO NOT USE FOR NAVIGATIONSOME NAVIGATION AIDS MAY NOT BE SHOWN

4/30/2009Page 1

WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. MEXICAN BORDER TO DIXON ENTRANCE. - 1 : 1,088,000(Passport World Charts - vector format) Chart #U501 - Depth Units: Fathoms

Peter Leipzig
Text Box
Attachment 1 Industry proposal
Page 5: Proposal to modify the northeast boundary of · PDF fileProposal to modify the northeast boundary of the Eel River EFH no-trawl area Date: ... NOBELTEC Visual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

Oceana Attachment 1: Revised Alternative C.12 May 11, 2005

84

Figure 37: Eel River Canyon

Peter Leipzig
Text Box
Attachment 2 Oceana proposal
Page 6: Proposal to modify the northeast boundary of · PDF fileProposal to modify the northeast boundary of the Eel River EFH no-trawl area Date: ... NOBELTEC Visual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

NOBELTECVisual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

Blunts

Reef

(1980)M

rky

M

rky

293372

342 126673 2651636 13291618

61385

279 168

1264 5931563

284

72 37686 448

1492

1373369 75 39

582 21406

478

525 85 251388

384604 438

132933

141454 753 1141455 288

740

79233

1252 32 22

1493 5961443 77 16

152 62 45 291294

2043152

1120 4113931372 554 14

321170

54

284 1199 44162

1173949 262

17

710655 813 211 39717

530 632

178482 610166 213645 334

137 78325 45

FlWFlWFlFlWFlW

Fl(4)W 20sFl(4)W 20sFl(4)W 20sFl(4)W 20sFl(4)W 20s

FlR 2sFlR 2sFlR 2sFlR 2sFlR 2s

N

016016

015015

014014013013

012012

011011

010010

009009

008008

007007

006006

005005

004004 003003

002002

001001

Nobeltec software™ - Copyright © 1995-2005 Nobeltec Corporation (800-946-2877)DO NOT USE FOR NAVIGATIONSOME NAVIGATION AIDS MAY NOT BE SHOWN

4/28/2009Page 1

WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA. MEXICAN BORDER TO DIXON ENTRANCE. - 1 : 1,088,000(Passport World Charts - vector format) Chart #U501 - Depth Units: Fathoms

Peter Leipzig
Text Box
Attachment 3 Final Eel River EFH area
Page 7: Proposal to modify the northeast boundary of · PDF fileProposal to modify the northeast boundary of the Eel River EFH no-trawl area Date: ... NOBELTEC Visual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

NOBELTECVisual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

(1980)

85 25

438

33

114

288

79

32 22

16

N

9999

9898

9797

9696

016016

015015

003003

002002

001001

Nobeltec software™ - Copyright © 1995-2005 Nobeltec Corporation (800-946-2877)DO NOT USE FOR NAVIGATIONSOME NAVIGATION AIDS MAY NOT BE SHOWN

4/28/2009Page 1

U.S. - WEST COAST. CALIFORNIA - OREGON. MONTEREY BAY TO COOS BAY. - 1 : 272,000(Passport World Charts - vector format) Chart #U18010 - Depth Units: Fathoms

Peter Leipzig
Text Box
Attachment 4 Eel River area with 75 fm RCA boundary
Page 8: Proposal to modify the northeast boundary of · PDF fileProposal to modify the northeast boundary of the Eel River EFH no-trawl area Date: ... NOBELTEC Visual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

NOBELTECVisual Navigation Suite 7.1.900

(1980)

85 25

438

33

114

288

79

32 22

16

N

016016

015015

003003

003003 002002

002002

001001

001001

Nobeltec software™ - Copyright © 1995-2005 Nobeltec Corporation (800-946-2877)DO NOT USE FOR NAVIGATIONSOME NAVIGATION AIDS MAY NOT BE SHOWN

4/28/2009Page 1

U.S. - WEST COAST. CALIFORNIA - OREGON. MONTEREY BAY TO COOS BAY. - 1 : 272,000(Passport World Charts - vector format) Chart #U18010 - Depth Units: Fathoms

Peter Leipzig
Text Box
Attachment 5 Eel River area with proposed change in red