proposed jarrahdale skatepark/bmx community facility...event opportunities such as markets, music,...

Proposed Jarrahdale Skatepark/BMX Community Facility

Site Selection Report November 2010

BY CONVIC DESIGN FOR SERPENTINE JARRAHDALE SHIRE

2 | P a g e Proposed Jarrahdale Skatepark/BMX – Site Selection Report – November 2010 – Convic Design

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................... 3

1.1 LOCATION OF SITES .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2 SKATEPARK TYPOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................... 4

2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Functional considerations ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Ancillary considerations ........................................................................................................................................ 5

3 SITE SELECTION CRITERIA ....................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Physical site conditions & technical considerations ............................................................................................. 6 3.3 Access/transport ................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.4 Natural surveillance, security and safety .............................................................................................................. 7 3.5 Proximity to amenities (water, toilets, Shade, food & drink) ................................................................................ 7 3.6 Impact on existing facilities, adjoining uses and users ........................................................................................ 7 3.7 Distance from housing & incompatible land use .................................................................................................. 8 3.8 Management & Maintenance issues .................................................................................................................... 8 3.9 Context & Amenity ................................................................................................................................................ 8

4 WEIGHTED MATRIX ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 5 SITE ASSESSMENT DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................... 12

5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 5.2 Overall Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 12 5.3 SITE 1 – CHURCH SITE (LOT 2, Jarrahdale Road) ......................................................................................... 12 5.4 SITE 2 – JARRAHDALE HERITAGE PARK SITE (LOT 200, Jarrahdale Road) .............................................. 14 5.5 SITE 3 – BRUNO GIANATTI HALL CAR PARK SITE (LOT 6, Munro Street) .................................................. 16 5.5.1 Bruno Gianatti Hall Car Park Site Diagrammatic Assessment ................................................. 18

5.6 SITE 4 – BUS STOP SITE (LOT 437, Jarrahdale Road) ................................................................................... 18 5.6.1 Bus Stop Site Diagrammatic Assessment ................................................................................ 21

5.7 SITE 5 – BRUNO GIANATTI HALL COMMUNITY PARK SITE (LOT 6, Munro Street) ................................... 21 5.7.1 Bruno Gianatti Hall Community Park Diagrammatic Assessment ........................................... 23

5.8 SITE 6 – SCHOOL OVAL SITE (Various Lots, Munro Street) ........................................................................... 23 5.9 SITE 7 – CHESTNUTS SITE (Lot 4490, King Jarrah Circle) ............................................................................. 24

6 COMPARATIVE COSTS FOR THE TOP THREE SITES .......................................................................................... 25 6.1 Comparative Cost Investigated .......................................................................................................................... 25

7 FINAL CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................. 26

=


1 INTRODUCTION Serpentine Jarrahdale Shire (SJS) has endorsed the proposal to investigate potential sites for the construction of a district standard skatepark within their municipality. Convic Design has been engaged by the Shire to review seven sites which have the relevant zoning and which are located throughout the heritage rich town of Jarrahdale. In reviewing the seven sites Convic Design have conducted a rigorous analysis of each site and applied a specific matrix site selection to assist in obtaining a recommendation for the preferred site of this important recreational facility in Jarrahdale. This report initially outlines the general requirements for a successful district standard skatepark, includes a description of the important site selection assessment criteria and then applies these to each of the locations to ascertain the most appropriate site for the facility. This review is set up as a weighted matrix to clearly outline the key components of the assessment process. Community comments and technical officer input have also been taken into consideration.

1.1 LOCATION OF SITES Six of the seven sites, as nominated by the Serpentine Jarrahdale Shire, are located within central Jarrahdale, while the seventh site is located on the SE outskirts of the recently developed residential growth area. The seven sites are identified on the map below:

Jarrahdale Town Aerial N.T.S

Site 1: Church Site (Lot 2, Jarrahdale Road) Site 2: Jarrahdale Heritage Park Site (Lot 200, Jarrahdale Road) Site 3: Bruno Gianatti Hall Carpark Site (Lot 6, Munro Street) Site 4: Bus Stop Site (Lot 437, Jarrahdale Road)

1

2

3 4

6

5

7

Ex


Site 5: Bruno Gianatti Hall Community Park Site (Lot 6, Munro Street) Site 6: School Oval Site (Various Lots, Munro Street) Site 7: Chestnuts Site (Lot 4490, King Jarrah Circle, Chestnuts) Ex: Location of existing steel modular skate facility

Please refer below to individual discussions in Section 5 on each of the seven sites for additional specific information.

2 SKATEPARK TYPOLOGY

2.1 Introduction This section outlines specifically what should be considered for a district level skate facility that caters for a range of users and various skill levels.

2.2 Functional considerations For the purposes of this report, a district level skatepark is defined as a facility that provides ample space and components to enable a variety of different skilled skate & BMX users to frequent the park on a daily basis whilst still providing opportunities and infrastructure for organised events and small scale local competitions. Note that any skate facility would be subject to site specific design and integrated into its surroundings and so would not necessarily be a single square concrete space. Some examples are shown below:

Little River Skate Facility, VIC Constructed September 2010

Muswellbrook Skate Facility, NSW Constructed October/November 2010


Berwick Skate Facility, VIC Constructed June 2010

Exmouth Skate & Youth Facility, WA Constructed October 2010 The following should be included in the facility;

A minimum of 400 sq/m of rideable area to provide enough space and components to provide for both advanced and beginner users for both transition and street users.

The areas should contain a mix of street and plaza components laid out to create designated session spots

whilst also designed to maximise flow wherever possible. Items for consideration (subject to user consultation) could include stairs, gaps, hubbas, ledges, rails, banks, pyramids and the like.

There should also be an area for transition skaters & BMX such as a bowled zone with a mix of depths and

components such as hips, roll ins, spines, gaps and the like (subject to user consultation).

2.3 Ancillary considerations


To compliment the above functional area, the following should also be considered to ensure the facility functions at its potential both for day to day use and during events;

Materials and colours need to be chosen to ensure maximum function & durability whilst contextually integrated, particularly given the aspect of heritage in the locale region

Clearly defined entrances to the skating / BMX areas with appropriate robust signage (including safety information, code of conduct etc) & demarcation as applicable.

Drinking fountains Rubbish bins at main entrances Viewing areas within the skatepark and in surrounding areas/along pedestrian path systems 3 Phase power & associated infrastructure (stage) for events/demos/small scale concerts Shade within the viewing and refuge spaces Lighting to the facility both for early night time use (timed sports lighting until 10pm or as deemed applicable by

the Serpentine Jarrahdale Shire) & security level when the facility is closed. The facility may also contain feature lighting as applicable

BBQ & Picnic Facilities Event opportunities such as markets, music, festivals, art display as well as more traditional skate / BMX events

including competitions & demonstrations by professional and advanced skate teams within/surrounding the site/stage.

Integrated landscaped areas, pathways and grassed spaces suitable for passive recreation and the inclusion of endemic species of plants

3 SITE SELECTION CRITERIA

3.1 Introduction This section summarizes key site selection criteria considered important when assessing the appropriateness for a skate facility in the seven locations. The criteria has been developed using information from the Sport and Recreation Victoria’s Skate Park Guide and Convic Design’s own professional experience (successfully designed over 200 skate park projects world wide). These criteria have then been weighted by Convic Design in order of deemed importance (refer second column in matrix). Convic Design has then applied these to each site and assessed them to calculate a preferred location. This is outlined in the matrix (refer section 4).

3.2 Physical site conditions & technical considerations This first broad criterion is based on the physicality of the various sites and whether they can accommodate a skate park of the required scale and typology. It also considers technical implications such as drainage and soil conditions. Questions asked at each site include;

Is the proposed site of adequate size (approx 400-500sq.m)? Is the site able to accommodate a variety of design options eg. bowl, street, urban, plaza? Is the site able to accommodate a diversity of skate / BMX elements and areas for several small groups or

individuals? Can the site accommodate the needs of different skill levels? Can the site accommodate access for users and spectators including refuge areas with seating, viewing and

adequate separation in an inclusive design? Does the site have the ability to cater for larger crowds and temporary infrastructure during peak use and

events? Can the proposed site accommodate potential future expansion? Is the proposed site free of existing land use implications, right of way, covenants, easements, service access

requirements and/or underground/overhead powerlines, water and gas? Are there minimal complex drainage requirements for the proposed site? Does the geotechnical classification for the site suggest minimal construction implications?


Does the topography at the proposed site require minimal construction implications (i.e. no need for significant earthworks, cut/fill or retaining structures)?

Is there existing potable water and electricity to the site?

3.3 Access/transport This second criterion looks at how easily accessible the site is for users, parents and those viewing the skatepark or events. With the main age group using this facility being children without the ability to drive, it is important to ensure that the facility can be easily accessed by all. Questions asked of each site on this criterion include;

Is there easy access to public transport at the proposed site? Are there pedestrian/footpath connections from transport or residential nodes to the proposed site? Is there a safe drop off area (evaluation of existing vehicular traffic arrangement may be necessary)? Is there adequate car parking?

3.4 Natural surveillance, security and safety Given we are looking at creating a public recreational facility with the main users being younger generations it is critical to ensure that the facility is open and safe and easily accessed in the case of an emergency. Questions asked for this criterion include;

Is the proposed site visually prominent with good public surveillance for safety and for the promotion of the facility and skate activity?

Is the proposed site a short distance from police response calls and does it provide ease of police access on schedules routes?

Can the proposed site provide adequate emergency vehicle access (fire and ambulance)? Can vehicular access be restricted at the proposed site to prevent skating at night by car light? Can the proposed site provide safe entry to and from the site and safe setbacks from busy roads and

intersections

3.5 Proximity to amenities (water, toilets, Shade, food & drink) An active public recreational facility such as a skatepark should have appropriate ancillary amenities as outlined in the previous section. This includes shade for viewing and resting, water bubblers and nearby toilets given users can spend many hours using a skatepark in a single session. Questions therefore asked for this criterion are;

Are associated amenities such as public telephone, toilets, water, shelter and shade existing and available or cost effective to install at the proposed site?

Is the proposed site close to shops selling food and drink and is there potential for seasonal, peak time and/or event day food and drink outlets?

3.6 Impact on existing facilities, adjoining uses and users To assess the suitability of a site, one of the main considerations is how much impact will the new skatepark have on the existing users and use of the space. This can be a contentious community issue and so the following questions have been asked for this criterion;

Can the proposed site facilitate no net loss of green space? Can the proposed site facilitate no impact on ecological systems eg. wetlands, foreshore and bushland Can the proposed site facilitate no net loss of mature or significant trees. All efforts should be made to retain

existing trees and include additional planting where possible.


Can the proposed site facilitate no impact on pedestrian or road network and access including existing lines of pedestrian movement?

Will the location of a skate facility on the proposed site not displace existing recreational or other site users? Are there no existing heritage items or indigenous people’s claims for land title or sites cultural significance at

the proposed site? Is there no history of social activity on a site including those considered ‘anti-social’?

3.7 Distance from housing & incompatible land use Another major consideration for any new public recreational facility is the potential impact of noise and light to nearby housing. It is important that the new skate facility is placed and designed to minimise impact to surrounding residential areas. We have undertaken acoustic assessments of a number of existing skateparks to ascertain an appropriate distance from residential areas and as a guide 50m is considered an acceptable distance. Please note that this is subject to a more detailed acoustic assessment as each location has different factors such as surrounding noise, landform, prevailing winds etc. Additional landscaping or noise buffers may be required after construction to offset any excess noise. Questions therefore include;

Is the site location an adequate distance (50m) from residential dwellings and incompatible land uses to avoid potential noise and light intrusions?

Has the site the capacity to be placed to maximise noise attenuation.

3.8 Management & Maintenance issues This is subject to Council’s expectations on the management of the facility. It depends on the level of on site supervision and maintenance of the facility. Almost all skateparks around Australia other than major CBD facilities are unsupervised and so management may not be important in this case. Maintenance is important to ensure the park can be cleaned easily and regularly. Questions therefore asked for this criterion are;

Does the proposed site have the availability of infrastructure to house management requirements including first aid, toilets and potential supervisors?

How readily accessible is the skatepark to regular cleaning by existing council cleaning and maintenance teams.

3.9 Context & Amenity The criteria is most applicable to the socialisation that occurs at skateparks and the importance of providing facilities that are where young people want to be and provide important amenity (sun protection, wind etc..) The following questions will be asked for each of the sites regarding context and amenity.

Is the proposed site location where young people want to be or adjacent to where they currently congregate? Is the proposed site in close proximity to existing shopping centres, sports or recreation facilities or interested

schools? Is it possible for the design to compliment the existing visual amenity of the site? Is the proposed site within or adjacent to a major community hub or central area?

4 WEIGHTED MATRIX The following is an assessment of each of the sites based on the criteria and questions outlined above to ascertain the most appropriate location for a skatepark.


Site 1: C

hurch Site

(Lot 2, Jarrahd

ale Ro

ad)

Site 2: Jarrahd

ale Herita

ge Park Site

(Lot 200, Jarrahd

ale Ro

ad)

Site 3: C

ommun

ity Hall &

Carpark Site

(Lot 6, M

unro Street)

Site 4: B

us Stop Site

(Lot 437, Jarrahd

ale Ro

ad)

Site 5: C

ommun

ity Hall &

Playgroun

d Site

(Lot 6, M

unro Street)

Site 6: Schoo

l Oval Site

(Various Lots, M

unro Street.)

Site 7: C

hestnu

ts Site

(King Jarrah

Circle)

CONSIDERATION/CRITERIA

Importance of Criteria

(5 highest, 1 lowest)

Extent of Meeting Criteria (0=does not meet criteria 1‐ partially meets criteria 2‐ generally meets criteria, 3‐completely meets criteria)

Physical site conditions & technical considerations

Is the proposed site is of adequate size (approx 400-500+sq.m)?

5 3 4 4 4 3 2 4

Is the site able to accommodate a variety of design options eg. bowl, street, urban, plaza?

5 2 4 3 3 3 2 3

Is the site able to accommodate a diversity of skate elements and areas for several small groups or individuals?

5 3 4 4 4 2 2 4

Can the site accommodate the needs of different skill levels? 3 3 4 3 3 3 2 4

Can the site accommodate access for users and spectators including refuge areas with seating, viewing and adequate separation in an inclusive design?

5 3 4 3 4 3 2 4

Does the site have the ability to cater for small crowds and temporary infrastructure during peak use and events?

3 2 4 3 2 3 1 4

Can the proposed site accommodate potential future expansion?

4 2 3 2 2 2 1 4

Is the proposed site free of existing land use implications, right of way, covenants, easements, service access requirements and/or underground/overhead powerlines, water and gas?

5 2 3 3 3 2 1 3

Are there minimal complex drainage requirements for the proposed site?

3 1 2 3 3 4 2 3

Does the geotechnical classification for the site suggest minimal construction implications?

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Does the topography at the proposed site require minimal construction implications (i.e. no need for significant earthworks, cut/fill or retaining structures)?

3 2 2 3 3 4 2 1

Is there existing potable water and electricity to the site? 4 3 3 4 3 4 2 3

Access/transport Is there easy access to public transport at the proposed site? 4 3 4 4 5 3 3 1

Are there pedestrian/footpath connections from transport nodes to the proposed site?

4 3 4 4 5 4 2 3

Is there a safe drop off area (evaluation of existing vehicular traffic arrangement may be necessary)?

4 3 4 5 4 3 3 3

Is there adequate car parking? (subject to traffic study, if applicable)

2 3 3 5 4 3 2 1

Natural surveillance, security and safety

Is the proposed site visually prominent with good public surveillance for safety and for the promotion of the facility and skate activity?

5 4 3 3 2 4 3 3

Is the proposed site a short distance from police response calls and does it provide ease of police access on schedules routes?

4 5 4 5 5 5 3 3

Can the proposed site provide adequate emergency vehicle access (fire and ambulance)?

4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4

Can the proposed site provide safe entry to and from the site and safe setbacks from busy roads and intersections

4 3 4 4 4 4 2 4

Proximity to amenities (water, toilets, shade, food & drink)

Are associated amenities such as public telephone, toilets, water, shelter and shade existing and available or cost effective to install at the proposed site?

5 2 3 5 5 5 2 2

Is the proposed site close to shops selling food and drink and is there potential for seasonal, peak time and/or event day food and drink outlets?

4 4 4 4 5 4 1 1

Impact on existing facilities, adjoining uses and users

Can the proposed site facilitate no net loss of currently used green space?

2 1 3 4 2 2 2 2


Can the proposed site facilitate no impact on ecological systems eg. wetlands, foreshore and bushland

4 1 3 4 2 5 1 3

Can the proposed site facilitate no net loss of mature or significant trees

3 2 4 4 2 4 1 3

Can the proposed site facilitate no impact on pedestrian or road network and access including existing desire lines?

3 3 3 4 5 3 2 3

Will the location of a skate facility on the proposed site not displace existing recreational or other site users?

3 3 1 3 5 1 2 2

Are there no existing heritage items or indigenous peoples claims for land title or sites cultural significance at the proposed site?

4 0 0 3 4 4 1 4

Can vehicular access be restricted at the proposed site to prevent skating at night by car light?

4 4 2 0 5 3 2 3

Is there no history of social activity on a site including those considered ‘anti-social’?

4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Distance from housing & incompatible land use

Is the site location an adequate distance (50m) from residential dwellings and incompatible land uses to avoid potential noise and light intrusions?

5 5 5 0 4 0 2 0

Has the site the capacity to have the skate facility placed to maximise noise attenuation and light intrusion if applicable.

5 4 4 0 3 2 2 1

Management & Maintenance issues

Does the proposed site have the availability of infrastructure to house management requirements including first aid, toilets and potential supervisors?

2 3 3 4 1 5 2 2

How readily accessible is the skatepark to regular cleaning for existing council cleaning and maintenance teams.

4 3 4 4 2 4 3 4

Context & Amenity Is the proposed site location where young people want to be or adjacent to where they currently congregate?

4 3 3 3 4 4 1 1

Is the proposed site in close proximity to existing shopping centres, sports or recreation facilities or interested schools?

3 3 4 4 4 4 1 2

Is it possible for the design to compliment the existing visual amenity of the site?

4 3 2 3 4 3 2 2


Is the proposed site within or adjacent to a major community hub or central area?

4 3 3 4 4 4 1 1

Consistency with Strategic Objectives

Is the proposed location of the skate facility consistent with the strategic land use, planning

4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Weighted Assessment of 7 Sites

145 97 114 120 124 117 66 91

percentage success of site considering all criteria

67% 79% 83% 86% 81% 46% 63%

5 SITE ASSESSMENT DISCUSSION

5.1 Introduction This section looks initially at the overall broader location in which all seven sites are located and then discusses the results of the matrix and individual sites. The top three sites which are appointed the highest values will then be further evaluated and discussed in the Site Selection Report and thought will be given to possible design opportunities and outcomes.

5.2 Overall Summary Of the seven assessed sites, six are located within close proximity to one another and so many of the broader considerations are applicable to many of the considered sites. Some of these similarities can be applied to geographic location in relation to other existing services, amenities and facilities, proximity to schools, community hubs, food & beverage outlets, and as well as toilets, emergency services and public transportation. Following the development of a facility it is encouraged that daily maintenance of the facility takes place, similar to any outdoor recreational precinct, be carried out to ensure the facility is kept clean and clear of sand, vegetation litter and debris. It is essential that the chosen site is located in a visually predominant position which is central to other facilities and services. Maintaining clear view lines into the site will ensure that the facility is accepted by the wider community, while also increasing general public surveillance and safety. The chosen site must also be in a location which is easily accessible for all people of different age groups and abilities. The following discussion summarises each of the sites in more detail and then outlines our final recommendation as the preferred location for the skate facility, taking into consideration the weighted matrix contained herein.

5.3 SITE 1 – CHURCH SITE (LOT 2, Jarrahdale Road)


Image: West View of Jarrahdale Rd deciduous vegetation shown in background.

Image: T-Intersection of Jarrahdale Rd & Oak Way with Church in background.

The Church Site is located on the northern side of Jarrahdale Rd, adjacent from Oaks Way and next to the recently relocated Anglican Church.

The site is an open degraded lawn area which is set a lower grade to that of the road. This grade extends downwards towards the existing valley & creek. Site 1 is subject to inundation and as a result design will require earthworks to build the site to a higher level.

The site is located along one of the Jarrahdale Heritage Park walking trails (4.5km track loop).

Jarrahdale Primary School is located approximately 600m to the south of the site.

School bus routes and infrequent public bus services run along Jarrahdale Rd with various bus stops.

The Jarrahdale Heritage Trading Post store is located approximately 400m E of the site and the Jarrahdale Tavern & Restaurant is 150m E of the proposed site. Jarrahdale Tavern & Restaurant has existing vehicle parking facilities.


The site is highly visible from Jarrahdale Rd and view lines back out to the road are unrestricted. This matter of clear sight affords the Church Site to have increased natural surveillance at all times and thus increased safety and security.

Summary The site is contained by existing deciduous vegetation, Jarrahdale Rd, the recently relocated Church building and Jarrahdale Creek. The enclosed nature of the site limits the opportunity to expand the facility at a later date; size also limits the extent to how the facility may be used to stage community events. While the facility is not the most centrally located of the assessed sites, it is still within 700m from services such as the Jarrahdale General Store, Jarrahdale Primary School and Community Hall / amenities. The site is positioned on low lying land which is subject to inundation. Any proposed facility would be required to be built up at a height similar to that of Jarrahdale Rd. If the site were to be considered for the location of a youth recreation facility safe formalised pedestrian crossings across Jarrahdale Rd would need to be implemented to ensure safe access. Following further investigation it has been noted that existing low level contours have aboriginal significance, identified as a place of camping. It has been identified that Aboriginal artefacts have been located onsite and it is expected that other similar and like artefacts may be found scattered across the space. Although the site is close to existing services, has high natural surveillance and is an adequate distance from residences, the cultural significance and heritage of the site overrides such factors. Development of any kind to the Church site would be irresponsible and insensitive to the traditional owners of the site and cultural identity. Taking these factors into account, the Church site was ranked 5th most preferred site (third lowest) in the Matrix, Section 4. In terms of community consultation the Church Site performed:

Third most preferred site by Jarrahdale Youth Consultation Sixth most preferred site as indicated from Community Mail Out Strongly objected to by the National Trust who have links to deeds governing development of the land.

5.4 SITE 2 – JARRAHDALE HERITAGE PARK SITE (LOT 200, Jarrahdale Road)

Image: View looking W over proposed site from vehicle entry driveway.


Image: View of site looking SE to Jarrahdale Rd from existing heritage

The second site resides on the northern side of Jarrahdale Rd, at the southern embankment of the Jarrahdale Heritage Park opposite the existing historic Mill Managers Residence.

Various industrial remnants & informative signage of Jarrahdale’s 1890’s timber heritage are represented at several location onsite.

The site is positioned along one of the Jarrahdale Heritage Park walking trails (4.5km walking loop)

Site is located approx: 200m SW from Heritage Trade Post store, 470m E from Jarrahdale General Store and 400m SE from Jarrahdale Primary School.

Existing landscape facilities such as formalised car entry, fencing, pole lighting, signage, rubbish disposal facilities and table/ seat picnic infrastructure are currently located on site.

Existing site topography is flat with a slight grade sloping towards the northern side of the site, down towards

the creek and valley.

Summary View lines from Jarrahdale Road are hindered by existing vegetation which is located along the road and at the height of the raised embankment edge. Some semi-mature trees are sporadically located across the park providing shelter and shade. The site is also equipped with existing power as indicated by onsite night pole lighting. The site is sparse, allowing the possibility for a range of design possibilities which will lead to increased functionality, allow for future extensions if required, and is suitable to encourage wider community participation and involvement. While there is a gated and formalised car entry point from Jarrahdale Rd into the site, there does not appear to be any formalised pedestrian access and entry into the space. During the consultation phase the Serpentine Jarrahdale Shire sought discussions with the stakeholders.The National Trust expressed that they would not permit the implementation of a youth recreation facility at this site as it would not successfully integrate with the existing natural and cultural values and proposed Jarrahdale Heritage Park plans for the site. The Jarrahdale Heritage Park has significant heritage buildings and remanets of the 1890’s timber town past. The threat of vandalism to heritage rich structures and other existing park facilities was also noted as a strong objection. While considerations such as close proximity to existing services, facilities and onsite amenities are highly rated in the matrix (see Section 4), the cultural significance of Jarrahdale’s industrial past at this site is of such significance that the placement of a recreation facility will not be permitted by the National Trust, despite various potential design methods of


integration being considered. As a result, the Heritage Park site has been ranked the fourth most compatible site as noted in the Matrix (see Section 4). As indicated by extensive community consultation the Heritage Park Site was ranked:

Second most preferred site by Jarrahdale Youth Consultation (equal ranking with proposed Car Park Site 3) The least preferred site by the Heritage Society and the National Trust as indicated in Community Mail Out. The fifth most preferred site from the results of the Community Mail Out Survey Not permissible by the National Trust

5.5 SITE 3 – BRUNO GIANATTI HALL CAR PARK SITE (LOT 6, Munro Street)

Image: View of site looking NW towards existing Heritage Trading Post store & residence. Existing toilet amenities visible in foreground.

The Car Park site is located in central Jarrahdale, behind Jarrahdale Rd and along Munro Street. The site is

positioned opposite to the Jarrahdale Fire Brigade and adjacent to Bruno Gianatti Hall.

The site is an open rectangular expanse of dirt and local stone aggregate. Native, but not endemic Acacias and other vegetation is located at the N and W extents of the site. The site is predominantly flat and elevated with a sharp decrease in grade at the northern extent, overlooking the existing War Memorial site.

The site borders a property line with the Jarrahdale Heritage Trading Post / General Store. This building is also

a residence and as a result does not satisfy the 50m minimum clearance as indicated in the Matrix outlined in Section 4.

Jarrahdale Primary School is located approximately 120m south of the Car Park site

Summary The site is contained by an existing car park, Munro St, Jarrahdale War Memorial and Jarrahdale Heritage Trading Post store (also a private residence). The rectangular parcel of land is centrally located within the town of Jarrahdale, is within close proximity to Jarrahdale Primary School and positioned adjacent to Bruno Gianatti Hall. Vegetation onsite is contained to the extents of the site. While the site is clearly visible from Munro St, site surveillance is hindered by existing vegetation on the northern and western boundary, and the location of the Hall on the southern boundary. As the site is positioned at an elevated level, it is recommended that if the Car Park site is considered for Design Development an acoustic assessment of the site should be carried out to ensure noise generated by the skatepark is not obtrusive to the immediate community and relevant steps be taken to offset any excess noise. It is possible to design out noise through the use on integrated planting (screening) and also the implementation of unobtrusive sound walls, which may also become a feature of the design.


While the location of the existing car park is beneficial in terms of providing a safe ‘drop off – pick up’ area, this may also encourage after hours use of the facility and potentially anti-social behaviour. Proposed landscape extensions to the existing War Memorial, which include retaining walls and additional vegetation may infringe on the proposed site, (although this is unclear at the present time), further limiting available design space. Extensive community consultation was conducted with stakeholders and groups including the Serpentine Jarrahdale RSL. The Serpentine Jarrahdale RSL expressed concerns that the location of a recreation facility within such close proximity to the existing War Memorial structure would increase the likelihood of vandalism to the memorial. The Jarrahdale RSL also voiced concerns that at times of formal remembrance the existing memorial is not capable of accommodating the amount of crowds who attend gatherings. The Jarrahdale RSL has indicated that they have been working on plans to extend and upgrade the current memorial. The community has also expressed concerns about taking away car parking spaces around the Hall as there is very limited car parking space available in the town and the monthly markets brings in significant numbers of people coming into the town and already lining the side of the street with their cars. They fear that taking away the car park will make the situation worse. Alternative parking spaces may need to be constructed elsewhere in the town. Alternative arrangements may be found by creating Angle Parking or where there are plans to develop the Jarrahdale Heritage Park to allow for extra car parking although this may not be available for several years. Where the community fear the potential of antisocial behaviour on this site – particularly in relation to the toilets and war memorial, the youth have also expressed their concerns to the adult community that the youth should be permitted and trusted to recreate respectfully next to such community memorials that the youth see to represent the commemoration of loss of life for the sake of the freedom and quality of life for people just like them. Considerations such as close proximity to existing services and facilities, being centrally located and positioned near where young people already congregate are outlined in the matrix in Section 4. As a result, such factors allow the Bruno Gianatti Community Hall Carpark Site to be ranked second most preferred highest site in the Matrix (see Section 4). As indicated by extensive community consultation the Car Park Site was ranked:

Second (equal with Site 2: Lot 200) most preferred site by Jarrahdale Youth Consultation Second most preferred site as indicated from Community Mail Out Opposed by the Serpentine Jarrahdale RSL From the most recent October 2010 community forum survey results and comments the Bruno Gianatti Hall Car

Park site was the second most preferred location of the three highest ranked sites in the Matrix. The location of this area being close to the Jarrahdale Heritage Post Office, access to public toilets and central to the community hub were some of the supporting reasons as to why this site was so highly rated by the community. The community also noted that as the site is largely clear of existing vegetation and as a result the implementation of a facility at this location would require little loss of amenity. Some members of the community raised concerns of the risk of vandalism to the existing War Memorial located at the foot of the site, the close proximity of residence, the loss of car park spaces and potential antisocial behaviour which may occur – especially at the existing toilet block as reasons why the site may be an unsuitable location for a recreation facility.


5.5.1 Bruno Gianatti Hall Car Park Site Diagrammatic Assessment

5.6 SITE 4 – BUS STOP SITE (LOT 437, Jarrahdale Road)

Image: View of site looking SW on Jarrahdale Rd


Image: View from within site looking NE towards Jarrahdale Rd

The Bus Stop Site is located along Jarrahdale Rd and is centrally positioned to the entire township. The site is located slightly north of the existing Jarrahdale Fire Brigade and is in close proximity to existing recreational activities such as Tennis courts.

The site is set amongst semi-dense vegetated areas. Following a recent Flora survey carried out by Dr. P.

Hollick on 21.09.10 the vegetation condition across the whole site has been assessed as “poor to good – 70% poor and 30% good”. It is likely the site will require strategic removal (or relocation) of some species to provide additional available space.

The site is closely positioned directly behind the central Jarrahdale bus stop and existing public phone box.

Existing formalised pedestrian footpaths line Jarrahdale Rd, however no formalised connection is made into the proposed site.

The Jarrahdale General Store is located (approximately) 50m SE of the site and the Heritage Trading Post Office is located (approximately) 200m W of the proposed site.

Natural surveillance into the site is hindered by extensive bushland vegetation which currently scatters the site

and surrounds. View lines from Jarrahdale Rd and once amongst the site are limited because of this. Summary The site is contained by Jarrahdale Rd, Munro St and Brady Rd. Located directly behind the proposed site is Jarrahdale Tennis courts and the Jarrahdale Fire Brigade. The site is centrally located along Jarrahdale’s major connector road which has formalised pedestrian pathways which are safely setback from the road. The site is completely covered in native and endemic vegetation. As noted above, a recent Flora survey and assessment of the site has found that 70% of species are in a ‘poor’ condition. The specific area which has been suggested for a potential skatepark is located where the 30% “good quality” vegetation is located. While the site has been acknowledged as being species rich and diverse, patches of weed infestations correlate in areas noted as being in ‘poor’ flora condition. In addition to this, two existing significant Jarrah trees contain significant habitat value for the site. If the Bus Stop Site were to be chosen for the development of the Jarrahdale Recreation Facility it is essential that these trees must be retained and protected through all stages of development and design. Methodically removing various patches of degraded bushland will result in increased visual sight lines from Jarrahdale Rd thereby enhancing the overall surveillance, safety and security of the site. Surveillance from other directions however will be still limited due to the vegetation onsite. The site is located within close proximity to existing amenities and services such as the central Jarrahdale Bus Stop, General Store, and public phone box. Street lighting along Jarrahdale Rd provide spill lights across pathways and slightly into site. There may be the opportunity to integrate existing street lighting into the site if future lighting is desirable. There is the possibility to reference the site specific nature of the site by introducing an educational trail which provides information relating to existing endemic species which are located in this parcel of land. The opportunity to extend existing walking trails to meet up with the proposed facility should also be investigated. Any proposed landscape treatments to the facility should, where possible, reference the natural aesthetic and as well as the flora and fauna of the site.


Considerations such as close proximity to other outdoor recreation activities, amenities, services, transport, and sufficient distance from existing residential dwellings has been noted in the matrix in Section 4. These considerations and the geographic position of the site alludes to the possibility the Bus Stop site has the potential to become a central community space for the Jarrahdale community to experience. A rough estimate of costs for the removal of trees is around $2,000 per tree. Based on the specific location selected within the site there may be up to 40 trees that will need to be cleared or relocated to allow for adequate space and surveillance for the skatepark. The Shire has been liaising with the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) who have indicated that it would take 2-3 months (if requested) for DEC to undertake a thorough flora study in order to assess the site. Once DEC has completed their assessment, they would then be able to determine whether a clearing permit would be granted. If permission is granted then the Shire may need to provide an offset for any loss of vegetation. Any offset relates to the planting of trees to replace trees removed. If permission is not granted no further development can occur on this site. Thorough community consultation with stakeholders Jarrahdale Fire Brigade revealed concerns in regards to antisocial behaviour and vandalism to private property. Concerns were also raised in regards to the extent to which existing flora would need to be cleared in order to accommodate a recreation facility at the site. The Jarrahdale Fire Brigade also expressed concerns of prohibited vehicle access, pending the exact location of a facility, which may restrict access by fire response vehicles. The Bus Stop site achieved the highest score as outlined in the Matrix (Section 4) and as a result has been noted as the most preferred site for a Skate & BMX Facility using the matrix system. As indicated by extensive community consultation the Bus Stop Site was ranked:

Most preferred site by Jarrahdale Youth Consultation (11/17 response in favour for Lot 437 as preferred site) Most preferred site as indicated from Community Mail Out (21/34 responses in favour for Lot 437 as a preferred

site) From the most recent October 2010 community forum survey results and comments the Bus Stop site Lot 437

was the most preferred location of the three highest ranked sites in the Matrix. The central location of this area with close access to a public telephone, public bus stop and shops has been the repeated reasons for why the community have chosen this site as the most suitable for a recreation facility. The community have raised concerns in regards to the removal of vegetation that would be required to locate a skate facility in this areas and the flow on effects of that removal – specifically, the loss of vegetation which is home to local wildlife.


5.6.1 Bus Stop Site Diagrammatic Assessment

5.7 SITE 5 – BRUNO GIANATTI HALL COMMUNITY PARK SITE (LOT 6, Munro Street)

Image: View towards Jarrahdale Primary School with existing play space in foreground.


The Bruno Gianatti Community Hall Park Site is centrally located at the intersection of Munro Street and Wanliss Street. The site is currently used as a central Children’s Playspace with two recently constructed sand retained play spaces with play items suitable for early childhood development play and older intermediate children’s play. The site is also used by the hirers of the Hall and buffers existing residential development as well as the central Bruno Gianatti Hall.

Formalised garden beds are located at the road sides of the site. The location of these garden beds hinders view lines into the site. Little vegetation is located elsewhere thus providing limited shade and shelter; the site remains bare and exposed to the elements.

The playground site is located opposite Jarrahdale Primary School and opposite the Jarrahdale Tennis Courts.

Summary While the Community Park site is centrally located and positioned close to existing amenities, services and existing recreation facilities, the inclusion of a Skate / BMX facility at this site would require the relocation or reconfiguration within the same site of all or some sections of the existing children’s play spaces, or moving some of the gardens bed, to ensure adequate distances are offset from the two different recreation types. Due to the limited space and possible increased cost implications, the inclusion of a facility at this site may not have the ability to cater for both uses adequately also restricting the extent to which community events might occur. It is probable that any proposed extensions to a facility at this site might be compromised due to a lack of physical space. The close proximity to existing residential dwellings, which boarder the western edge of the site, does not satisfy the standard 50m minimum clearance as outlined in Section 4, in the Matrix. If the site were to be considered as a preferred site it is encouraged and recommended that Council undertake an acoustic assessment of the site to ensure noise generated from the facility is within an acceptable standard and relevant steps be taken to offset any excess noise. Considerations such as close proximity to existing services, facilities, school and being centrally located has resulted in the Playground site being ranked third most preferred site in the Matrix (see Section 4). If the Playground site were to be chosen as the location for a recreation facility, further thought into the relocation of existing Playground infrastructure would need to be carefully considered. Any reconfiguration of the playground would incur additional costs. As indicated by extensive community consultation the Playspace Site was ranked:

Not ranked as a preferred site by Jarrahdale Youth Consultation Third most preferred site as indicated from Community Mail Out (equal with proposed Car Park site) From the most recent October 2010 community forum survey results and comments, the Community Park site

was the third most preferred location of the three highest ranked sites in the Matrix. The community felt that placing a skate facility where existing infrastructure was already located would allow the park to successfully integrate. The community raised concerns in regards to the reconfiguration of the existing children’s playground, nearby residential housing and the possible safety risk of trying to balance a range of users within close proximity to one another at this space.


5.7.1 Bruno Gianatti Hall Community Park Diagrammatic Assessment

5.8 SITE 6 – SCHOOL OVAL SITE (Various Lots, Munro Street)

Image: View of Munro St (residential dwellings seen in distance) and extent of site.

The School Oval site is a parcel of land which buffers Munro St, Jarrahdale Primary School access driveway and Jarrahdale sport ovals. The site is positioned directly opposite existing residential dwellings (within 50m minimum distance).

The site slopes downwards from the back extents near existing oval precinct, down to Munro St road verge, and

then meeting up with an existing formalised concrete pedestrian pathway.


The site is sporadically covered in a range of native vegetation of varying heights and density. The strategic

removal of species, following subsequent instruction by an independent Arborist, would be required to ensure a facility is able to be positioned within the site.

The layout and physical size of the site is restrictive to future extensions. The size of the site may result in a limited range of elements and thus levels of experience to enjoy the facility.

Summary The School Oval site lacks available space due to the placement of existing facilities and infrastructure such as Jarrahdale oval & Jarrahdale Primary School oval and fence lines, and Munro St. Size constraints to this site will ultimately control the extent for which the design of a facility can occur. Any future extensions to a facility will also be severely hindered because of the lack of overall available area. While existing formalised pedestrian footpaths are located along Munro St, there is little opportunity to provide a vehicle ‘drop off – pick up’ point because of the limited space. A lack of overall area will result in limiting users to visit the facility and restrict the facility to be adopted as a resources for the wider community. Although centrally positioned to existing facilities, amenities, and whilst being highly sited, the School Oval site is located within a residential region and does not satisfy the 50m minimum proximity requirements between a Skate / BMX Facility and dwellings. In addition, the existing topography of the site slopes towards existing residential areas, thus potentially exaggerating acoustics associated with the facility. Such constraints were highlighted in Section 4 Matrix. As a result the School Ovals site was the least preferred of the 7 assessed sites. As indicated by extensive community consultation the School Oval Site was ranked:

Not ranked as a preferred site by Jarrahdale Youth Consultation Fourth most preferred site as indicated from Community Mail Out

5.9 SITE 7 – CHESTNUTS SITE (Lot 4490, King Jarrah Circle)

Image: King Jarrah Circle Site with sporadically located mature vegetation.

The Chestnuts site is located south of central Jarrahdale town, amongst a recently developed residential growth area. The site is positioned along King Jarrah Circle near Marginata Pde & Powderbark Cl.

Mature vegetation is scattered along the fringes of the site while dense clumping species are located towards

the centre of the circle reserve. Formalised garden beds are located along road verges.


Formalised pedestrian pathways are established along the road verges and through the reserve, thereby linking

other areas of Chestnuts development.

The existing topography is flat with floating Precambrian rock (specific to the area – Darling Plateau Laterite) exceeding 150mm in visible length.

Summary The proposed site of the facility is to be located along King Jarrah Circle. The circle provides an arterial which connects to recently developed and proposed residential streets. Some existing residential properties located along the Circle do not satisfy the 50m minimum clearance requirements for what is considered a suitable distance of facilities in relation to residential properties. While the Chestnuts site is located in a space which could support future extensions, hold community events and compliment existing landscape treatments, the geographic location of the site in relation to existing services and facilities in Jarrahdale is not central; the site is located on the fringes of the town and away from where young people want to be. Of the seven assessed sites, the Chestnut site is located the furthest away from existing facilities and services. As a result the Chestnut site performs poorly in the Matrix when rated against ‘Proximity to amenities (water, toilets, shade, food & drink)’, ‘Access/transport’ and ‘Context & Amenity’. The low rating of the Chestnuts site is reflected in greater detail in Section 4. The Chestnut site scored the second lowest (6th most preferred site) value for sites assessed using the Matrix system. As indicated by extensive community consultation the Chestnuts Site was ranked:

Not ranked as a preferred site by Jarrahdale Youth Consultation Seventh most preferred site as indicated from Community Mail Out

6 COMPARATIVE COSTS FOR THE TOP THREE SITES With an arbitrary budget of around $250,000 to enable the construction of the skateable concrete areas (not including site preparation work or additional landscaping) which would provide a similar size facility to the current skatepark, the following additional site costs have been considered to enable comparison between the top three sites in terms of site preparation.

6.1 Comparative Cost Investigated

Site 3: Bruno Gianatti Community Hall Carpark Site Munro Street Lot 6

Site 4: Bus Stop Site Jarrahdale Road Lot 437

Site 5: Bruno Gianatti Community Hall Community Park Site Munro Street Lot 6

Site Preparation & Earthworks (approximately costs only).

Inclusion of landscape excavation and fill to skate elements and landscape barriers (this will vary following detailed design). Total: $20K



Reconfiguration of existing aspects of site

Relocation of some existing vegetation to ensure safety

Strategic removal of existing vegetation to

Existing playground to be reconfigured to


such as removal of existing infrastructure, services, vegetation, re-established vegetation, etc. (approximately costs only- prior to works Dial Before You Dig information must be sought to view any underground services located at site).

view lines are increased. Council estimation of $2K-$3K/tree; estimation of 8 trees required to be removed. Total: $16K

provide adequate space for facility . Council estimation of $2K-$3K/tree; estimation of approximately 40 trees required to be removed. Total: $60-120K

accommodate skate facility (including associated landscape barriers, viewing areas, sufficient offsets to ensure safety of both skate facility & playground uses). Removal and reconfiguration of existing garden beds Total: $35K

Provision of Car Parking to assist service site (approximately costs only).

Following more detailed design options, additional car parking is required to offset carpark spaces lost due to implementation of facility. Total: $20K

Adequate Parking available at Bruno Gianatti Community Hall carpark. Total: $0K

Adequate Parking available at Bruno Gianatti Community Hall carpark . Total: $0K

Provision of Landscape Treatments - i.e.: Drinking fountain, seating, shade/shelter structure, rubbish disposal, planting, facility signage, feature lighting, etc. (approximately costs only).

Inclusion of: - Drinking fountain (including connection, water supply and drainage) $6K - Facility Signage $4K -Rubbish Disposal $1K -Shade/shelter structure $10K -Seating & viewing areas for passive recreation $7K - Lighting $15K Total: $43K

Inclusion of: -Drinking fountain (including connection, water supply and drainage) $6K -Facility Signage $4K -Rubbish Disposal $1K -Shade/shelter structure $10K -Seating & viewing areas for passive recreation $7K -Lighting $15K Total: $43K

Inclusion of: -Drinking fountain (including connection, water supply and drainage) $6K - Facility Signage $4K -Seating & viewing areas for passive recreation $7K Total: $17K

Formalised pedestrian access, crossing, pathway links, etc (approximately costs only).

Existing paths on site - facility to possibly connect to existing links. Following further investigation, formalise pedestrian crossing to site at Munro St. Total: $10K

Existing paths at extent of site - facility to possibly connect to existing links located at Jarrahdale Rd. Provide safe crossing at Jarrahdale Rd. Total: $17K

Existing paths on site - facility to possibly connect to existing links. Total: $8K

Total Additional (approximate cost only). $109,000 $140,000-200,000 $80,000

*Note: Costs at this stage are indicative only and are not final. More rigorous detailed design is required at a later stage to better ascertain a true reflection of costs. The overall design type and specific siting of the facility will effect various aspects of the costing: i.e: Demolition & Earthworks, Landscape Treatments, etc.

7 FINAL CONCLUSION


Of the seven sites which were considered as being suitable for the placement of a Skate/BMX Facility, three of them scored highly on the weighted matrix combined with community consultation and technical officer input. In order of highest (most suitable recommended by Convic Design) the three sites are:

Site 4: Bus Stop site: Lot 437, Jarrahdale Rd (86%) Site 3: Bruno Gianatti Community Hall Carpark Site, Lot 6 Munro St (83%) Site 5: Bruno Gianatti Community Hall Park Site, Lot 6 Munro St (81%)

The three abovementioned sites are all located central to Jarrahdale, are close to existing services and facilities and are also highly accessible. Following careful removal of vegetation on some of the sites, all three sites have the potential to be clearly visible from passing motorists and pedestrians. Maintaining clear view lines into a site is essential as this promotes natural surveillance and increases users safety at all times. Following a more detailed design development, all three sites will require formalised pedestrian access points, to ensure safe access from roads and streets. The playground site will require reconfiguration of play equipment within the site to accommodate a skate/BMX facility at this location. Factors such as existing and previous land uses were also taken into account when considering a suitable site for a youth recreation facility. Sites which were culturally sensitive and retained high heritage significance to the region were considered unsuitable to accommodate a youth recreation facility. Similarly, sites which did not exhibit the ability to be integrated /inclusive of the wider community were also scored poorly. Proximity to existing residential dwellings and central locations was also highly noted. The following sites performed poorly in the previously mentioned points and as a result have been deemed least desirable for the location of the Jarrahdale Skate/BMX Community Facility:

Site 1: Church Site, Lot 2 Jarrahdale Rd Site 2: Jarrahdale Heritage Park Site, Lot 200 Jarrahdale Rd Site 7: Chestnut Site, King Jarrah Circle Site 6: School Ovals Site, Various Munro St

The close proximity of Site 4 Bus Stop Site to existing services and amenities such as existing bus stop, phone box, general store and community hall affords the site to be ranked highest. It is also noted that the site may be somewhat restricted in facility size and extension, and that landscape treatments will require sensitive execution to protect existing bushland. However, noting the extensive removal of vegetation that this site will incur and the additional cost that will be associated with vegetation removal, it may be decided that despite the sites’ high ranking value it is deemed to be less suitable than other sites. As a result, Site 3 Bruno Gianatti Community Hall Car Park site presents the second highest ranking with the least amount of remediation works to the site as it is stands whilst also remaining to be highly central and visible. The location of Site 3 Community Hall Car Park site is within close proximity to existing services and facilities such as the Jarrahdale Heritage Post Office and Jarrahdale General Store. The site is close to existing outdoor recreation facilities and has the geographic ability to become part of a broader community wide recreation program, run in conjunction with events staged at the Jarrahdale Community Hall, Playground & Tennis Courts. Whilst being in close proximity to the existing War Memorial, it is important that any designs do not encourage access through to the memorial but rather respectfully acknowledge the space. As the site is positioned along existing pedestrian footpaths, this may allow the opportunity to provide a community wide path to ensure the sites becomes inclusive for the wider community thereby encouraging community ownership by establishing educational and ecological trails, paths, planter beds, etc. The report and the recommendations are presented as Convic Design’s recommendations to Serpentine Jarrahdale Shire. This report is to be reviewed by Shire Officers and the JCA’s representative. A Council agenda item will then be written outlining the recommendations of the Convic Design Report and the JCA/Officers response to the recommendations.

proposed jarrahdale skatepark/bmx community facility...event opportunities such as markets, music,...

Documents