psychological and physiological realities of deadly force confrontations
DESCRIPTION
Psychological and Physiological Realities of Deadly Force Confrontations. Topics of Discussion. Introduction Dynamics of Deadly Force Confrontations U.S. Legal Standards and Court Decisions - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Psychological and Physiological Realities of
Deadly Force Confrontations
2
Topics of Discussion
• Introduction
• Dynamics of Deadly Force Confrontations
• U.S. Legal Standards and Court Decisions
• Practical Considerations for Drafting of Rules for the Use of Force (RUF) and/or Rules of Engagement (ROE)
3
Basics Concerning Deadly Force Confrontations
• Combat is the Universal Human Phobia
• Human Beings have a natural aversion to inflicting physical violence on members of their own species
• Each deadly force confrontation is unique and involves a wide variety of subjective variables
4
What Is Deadly Force?
• That force reasonably likely to result in death or seriously bodily injury to:
– Life
– Limb
– Eyesight
The firing of a weapon is by definition
the exercise of deadly force
5
Human Nervous System
• Central Nervous System– Brain and Spinal Cord
• Peripheral Nervous System– Somatic Nervous System – Conscious– Autonomic Nervous System – Unconscious
• Sympathetic• Parasympathetic
6
Dynamics of Deadly Force Confrontations
• Tache-Psyche
• Action v. Reaction
• Wound Ballistics
7
Tache-Psyche Effect
• During a deadly force confrontation, the autonomic nervous system is in control
• The body automatically allocates resources to enhance chances of survival
8
Fight or Flight
• Physical: Adrenaline dump– heart rate increased, blood
flow increased to major muscle groups
• Mental: Midbrain in control– Part of brain which has same
structure and function as animal brain
9
Sensory Distortion
• Sight– Loss of near vision and depth perception– Loss of peripheral vision, i.e., “tunnel vision”– Heightened visual acuity
• Hearing– Auditory exclusion– Heightened auditory acuity
• Touch– Tactile sense deteriorates
10
Cognitive/Thought Distortion
• Disjunction of time/space continuum
• Automatic behavior
• Memory loss or gaps
• Intrusive thoughts/Dissociation
• Temporary Paralysis
Effects of Hormonal Induced Heart Rate Increases
220
200
160
180
140
100
120
175 beats per minute: thought processing deteriorates, sensory distortion
80
CONDITION BLACK
CONDITION RED155 beats per minute: complex motor skill deteriorates
CONDITION YELLOW115 beats per minute: fine motor skill deteriorates
CONDITION WHITE60-80 beats per minute: resting heart rate
12
Implications
• There is no way to predetermine what sensory or cognitive distortion an individual will experience
• The body will focus on certain targets to the exclusion of others
• The body is effectively operating on auto-pilot. Training - good or bad - will take over
13
Deputy Sheriff Dinkheller Shooting
14
Action v. Reaction
• Bad guy decisions – When
• Good guy decisions – Three steps– Decision Time: Perceive threat and decide
on appropriate course of action– Response Time: Send nerve signals to
relevant muscle group– Mechanical Time: Physically complete
action, i.e., trigger breaks, hammer falls, firing pin is struck, firing pins strikes primer, etc.
15
Action v. Reaction
• Under ideal conditions, reaction time is anywhere from 0.8 – 1.5 seconds
• Reaction time is further affected by:– Sudden, unexpected movements– Rapid and unpredictable movement of shooter and targets– Limited target opportunities– Low light or partially obstructed– Stress of sudden close, and personal violence
• “Tueller” Drills – 21 foot/6.5 meter rule
16
Jewelry Store Police Killing
17
Wound BallisticsPhysical Factors
• Penetration
• Permanent Wound Cavity
• Temporary Cavity
• Fragmentation
18
Wound BallisticsRifle v. Pistol
• Pistol Bullets– Relatively slow impact velocities = no reliable fragmentation– Only means of incapacitation are tissue “crush” and
penetration into vital organs
• Rifle Bullets– Impact velocities high enough to
result in fragmentation
• Bigger holes better than smaller, deeper holes better than shallower, more holes better than fewer
19
Wound BallisticsPsychological Factors
• Expectations– Security guard in bank robbery– Police officer in drug raid
• Will to Fight– FBI Shootout in Miami
20
Wound BallisticsCommon Myths
• Heart shot will immediately incapacitate
• Sensory effects of bullet wounds are immediate
• “Knock-down” power of small arms
• “Center mass” shots always hit vital organs
21
Trooper Coates Shooting
22
U.S. Legal Standards
• Domestic use of deadly force is analyzed under 4th Amendment of the Constitution– Objective Reasonableness Standard
• Court Decisions– Graham v. Connor (1989)
• Reasonableness judged from perspective of law enforcement officer, not with “20/20” Hindsight
– Brown v. United States (1921)• Detached reflection not required in the presence of an
uplifted knife
23
Deadly Force Standard for U.S. Military Personnel
• Standing Rules for the Use of Force– Inherent right of self-defense
– Deadly force is to be used only when all lesser means have failed or cannot reasonably be employed
– Reasonable belief that person poses risk of death or serious bodily harm
24
Deadly Force Standard for Federal Law Enforcement Personnel
• Law enforcement agents/officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force only when necessary, that is, when the officer has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person
25
RUF/ROE Practical Considerations
• What is serious bodily injury or death?
• Minimum force/minimum number of shots
• Limitations on when weapon may be loaded/round in chamber
• Tache-Psyche & Investigations• Body armor and risk
26
Warning Requirement???
27
RUF/ROE Potential Problems
• Fear of using force/fear of weapons
• Qualification versus training mentality
• Misunderstanding of rules governing use of deadly force
28
RUF/ROE Potential Problems
• Misunderstanding the tactical dynamics of a deadly force encounter
• Unclear command guidance
• “Accidental” discharge paranoia
29
Consequences of Poorly Drafted or Misunderstood RUF/ROE
• Afghan robbers with AK-47 not threat!
• Green-zone Entry Control Point Guards
• Marines at Fallujah
• 82nd Airborne Division troops in Kosovo
• Sentry spotting insurgents setting bomb
30
Conclusion
• Deadly force confrontations involve rapidly changing, dynamic, and unique circumstances
• The realities of Tache-Psyche, Action v. Reaction, and Wound Ballistics are present in all deadly force scenarios
• Effective RUF/ROE will be drafted with an understanding of these realties
31