pulsed power physics branch, plasma physics division d. mosher1 pfrp mhd nrl symposium on recent...

15
ulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 1 PFRP MHD NRL NRL Symposium on Recent Advances in Plasma Physics June 10-12, 2007 The Plasma-Filled Rod Pinch: a Pulsed-Power HED Plasma Radiographic Source D. Mosher, B.V. Weber, and J.W. Schumer Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA * Work supported by the U.S. Office of Naval Research, Sandia National Laboratories, and AWE Aldermaston, UK

Upload: cori-king

Post on 03-Jan-2016

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 1PFRP MHD

NRLNRL

Symposium on Recent Advances in  Plasma Physics June 10-12,  2007

The Plasma-Filled Rod Pinch:a Pulsed-Power HED Plasma Radiographic Source

D. Mosher, B.V. Weber, and J.W. Schumer

Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA

* Work supported by the U.S. Office of Naval Research, Sandia National Laboratories, and AWE Aldermaston, UK

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 2PFRP MHD

NRLNRLBackground

• NRL has a long-term program to develop intense, mm-diam bremsstrahlung radiography sources driven by 100-ns, 1- to 6-MV, TW-level pulsed-power generators

• Our star performer is the plasma-filled rod pinch (PFRP), a sub-mm source concentrating a 0.5-MA, MeV electron beam onto the tip of a 1-mm-diam, tapered tungsten rod1

• Tungsten plasma expansion during the x-ray pulse limits the source brightness

• Understanding the dynamics of the high-energy-density tungsten plasma will help to improve this promising radiography source

• W plasma expansion was studied with holographic interferometry2

• These measurements and radiation imaging are compared with the results of simple, self-similar modeling of the plasma expansion

• Model predictions of the expansion and radiation patterns agree with measurements and indicate peak thermal energy densities of about2 MJ/cc, corresponding to > 10 Mbar peak pressure

1B.V. Weber, et al., Phys. Plas. 11, 2916-2927(2004).2D.M. Ponce, D. Phipps, D.D. Hinshelwood, and B.V Weber, Proc. 14 th Inter. Pulsed Power Conf.

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 3PFRP MHD

NRLNRLPFRP operation on Gamble II

• 1-mm-diam rod tapered to a point over 1- to 1.5-cm length

• Voltage before x-rays due tod(LI)/dt of the run-down phase

• About 40% of the 30-kJ diode energy is deposited as electrons in the tip

Plasmaconductscurrent

Gap opens,MeV electronsdeposited at tip

Tip explodes, anode plasma expands

0 50 1000.0

0.5

1.0

1.5Shot 7956

MV

, M

A

Time (ns)0

25

50

75

x-rays

current

voltage

+ MV

plasmaguns

mm-diamrod

Cathode

1016 cm-3

plasmaAnode

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 4PFRP MHD

NRLNRLX-Ray Radiography 101: Edge Spread

x z

y

x-y view at IPon line of sight

tungstenrollededge

x-raysource

imageplate(IP)

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 4 8 12 16

LSV (2.0e01) ESVcor (1.0e01)9127

ESF

y

do

se o

n IP

Edge Spread FunctionY

0

-Y-Y 0 Y

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 5PFRP MHD

NRLNRLX-Ray Radiography 101: Edge Spread

x z

y

x-y view at IPon line of sight

tungstenrollededge

x-raysource

imageplate

Y

0

-Y0

2

4

6

8

10

0 4 8 12 16

LSV (2.0e01) ESVcor (1.0e01)9127

ESF

do

se o

n IP

-Y 0 Yy

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 6PFRP MHD

NRLNRLX-Ray Radiography 101: Edge Spread

x z

y

x-y view at IPon line of sight

tungstenrollededge

x-raysource

imageplate

Y

0

-Y0

2

4

6

8

10

0 4 8 12 16

LSV (2.0e01) ESVcor (1.0e01)9127

ESF

do

se o

n IP

-Y 0 Yy

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 7PFRP MHD

NRLNRLX-Ray Radiography 101: Line Spread

• LSF(y)dy is a measure of x-ray energy emitted in a thin strip along x

• Source radial distribution:Point Spread Function PSF(r)

• PSF recovered from LSF byAbel inversion

x z

y

x-raysourcePSF(r)

y 22 yr

rdr)r(PSF2ESF

dy

d)y(LSF

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 4 8 12 16

LSV (2.0e01) ESVcor (1.0e01)9127

ESF

LSF

do

se o

n IP

Line Spread Function

y

x-y view

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 8PFRP MHD

NRLNRL

The plasma filled rod pinch diode on GAMBLE II has a line spread with two distinct length scales

• 0.4-mm FWHM characteristic of conical-rod-tip emission

• Few-mm "wings" associated with tungsten plasma expansion during the x-ray pulse

• X-ray pinhole images and interferometry show plasma expansion at the rod tip

• Use hydro-expansion model to confirm the wing feature

cathode

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.7

0.9

1.1

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3position (mm)

line

sp

rea

d (

LS

)

experiment

conical tip

Line Spread for 1-mm-DiamTapered W Rod

Interferogram and Rod Shadowat the End of the X-Ray Pulse

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 9PFRP MHD

NRLNRL

The axial line spread measures the x-ray intensity emitted along the rod

• The axial line spread is a measure of electron-beam heating vs z

• Beam heating near the rod tip has a FWHM of about 4 mm

• This axial heating profile is used in the model to drive tungsten-plasma expansion

• Hydro-expansion model predictions are compared to– 2D, time-dependent interferometry– the measured time-integrated LSF

• Agreement with these measurements will indicate that the tungsten plasma parameters are reasonable and in the HED regime

x z

y

image plate

rollededge

0.00.2

0.40.60.8

1.0

0 10 20 30 40axial position (mm)

Edge Spread

Line Spread

pinhole image

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 10PFRP MHD

NRLNRL

dt)t,r(P~)r(P

P)t,r(n~)t,r(P

dt

dR

2

NmdtR2TP)t(E

Rm

kT)Z1(2

dt

Rd

)0(Rm

N

R/rexp)t(R

N)t,r(n

end

0brbr

4/5hbr

2W

t

0

4hint

W2

2

W2

W

222

A self-similar expansion model is used to estimate the line spread of the PFRP

• Tungsten mass in length L of the conical tip is distributed in a cylinder

• The axial LSF suggestsL in the 3- to 5-mm range

• Ph(t) = 0.4IdiodeVdiode/L

• Black-body radiation with emissivity from radius R(t)

• Tungsten equation of statefrom SESAME3

– Eint = 1.5(1+Z)NkT + ionization

– Eth = 1.5(1+Z)NkT 0.4Eint

– max pressure = 0.67Eth/R2(t)

• <Pbr>(r) is the PSF from which the model line spread is calculated

Self-Similar Cylindrical Expansion(per cm length of plasma)

3NTIS Doc. DE94-011699, J. D. Johnson, ‘‘SESAME Data Base’’

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 11PFRP MHD

NRLNRL

0.0E+00

5.0E+03

1.0E+04

1.5E+04

2.0E+04

2.5E+04

3.0E+04

0 20 40 60 80t (ns)

en

erg

y (J

/cm

)

heating

kinetic

internal

radiation

Self-Similar Expansion of the Rod Tip = 0.1, L = 3.5 mm

Energy PartitionExpansion History

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70t (ns)

Eth /R2 (MJ/cc)

R (mm)

T(eV)/10

Z/3

Ph (1011 W/cm)

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 12PFRP MHD

NRLNRL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5r (mm)

<P

br>

(r)

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.7

0.9

1.1

1.3

1.5

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3position (mm)

line

sp

rea

d

experiment

L = 3 mm

L = 4 mm

Self-similar hydro expansion reproduces the PFRP line spread

• Predicted line spreads are nearly independent of emissivity

• Best fit to data for L = 3 - 4 mm,agrees with axial line spread

PSF from Model for L = 3.5 mm Line Spreads from Experimentand Model for L = 3 and 4 mm

y 22

br

yr

rdrP2)y(LS

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 13PFRP MHD

NRLNRL

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6z(cm)

R (

cm)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

T (

eV

)

R, 40 ns

R, 70 ns

R, 110 ns

T, 40 ns

The self-similar expansion model can be generalized to one-dimensional axial variations1

• N(z) = Rrod(z)2W/mW

• Ph(z,t) from axial line spread

• Add return-current ohmic heating to the energy balance– Iz ~ axial edge spread

– Spitzer resistivity

Expansion Model Variations with z

1B.V. Weber, et al., Phys. Plas. 11, 2916-2927(2004).

Je

Iz

return current

t = 40 nsz

0

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 14PFRP MHD

NRLNRL

• Fringe count determines experimental electron density neS(z,t) at the schlieren boundary RexS(z,t)

• Axial-expansion equations provide the self-similar expansion radius R(z,t)

• Determine theoretical schlieren boundary RthS(z,t) from

Schlieren boundary can be calculated from axial hydro and compared to experiment

22thS2eS R/Rexp

)t,z(R

)z(N)t,z(Z)t,z(n

mm

neS at RexS

RthS -1.0

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

Interferogram and Rod Shadow at 110 ns

• Axial-cylindrical modeling reproduces expansion

• Analysis valid for dR/dz < 1

• Does not predict spherical expansion at z < 2 mm from tip

Pulsed Power Physics Branch, Plasma Physics Division D. Mosher 15PFRP MHD

NRLNRLConclusions

• For the tapered-rod PFRP on Gamble II, intense beam heating of the low-mass rod tip produces rapid tungsten-plasma expansion leading to extended wings in the line spread

• Measured Schlieren images and line-spread distributions compare well with self-similar hydrodynamic modeling of rod-plasma expansion

• Model predictions indicate peak thermal energy densities of about2 MJ/cc, corresponding to > 10 Mbar peak pressure

• When axial variations are taken into account, higher energy density is predicted very close to the rod tip early in the expansion, though the assumption of 2D-cylindrical expansion breaks down

• Future plans include 2-D MHD and PIC simulations of the PFRP

• Challenges for future work include– rod return-current-heating effects during the run-down phase– the role of adsorbed gases in the rod– following the run-down/plasma-opening transition– beam- and plasma-current distributions in the expanding rod plasma– geometries that reduce the wings in the line spread