Appendix

Figure A. 1: Digital model of 3D printed barnacles

Figure A. 2: Frictional resistance coefficients of M-type barnacle surfaces for different coverages

Figure A. 3: Frictional resistance coefficients of S-type barnacle surfaces for different coverages

Figure A. 4: Frictional resistance coefficients of three different barnacle types for 10% coverage

Figure A. 5: CF increases of three type barnacle configurations for 20% coverage respects to bare plate at lowest and highest Reynold’s Number

Bulk carrier (180 m)

Figure A. 6: Added resistance diagram for 180 m Bulk carrier with different fouling conditions

Figure A. 7: Percentage increase in CF values and PE values of 180 m Bulk carrier with respect to the smooth

hull condition.

Bulk carrier (280 m)

Figure A. 8: Added resistance diagram for 280 m Bulk carrier with different fouling conditions

Figure A. 9: Percentage increase in CF values and PE values of 280 m Bulk carrier with respect to the smooth hull condition.

Cruise ship

Figure A. 10: Added resistance diagram for 280 m Cruise ship with different fouling conditions

Figure A. 11: Percentage increase in CF values and PE values of 280 m Cruise ship with respect to the smooth hull condition.

Tanker

Figure A. 12: Added resistance diagram for 250 m Tanker with different fouling conditions

Figure A. 13: Percentage increase in CF values and PE values of 250 m Tanker with respect to the smooth hull condition.

Special purpose vessel (60 m)

Figure A. 14: Added resistance diagram for 60 m Special purpose vessel with different fouling conditions

Figure A. 15: Percentage increase in CF values and PE values of 60 m Special purpose vessel with respect to the smooth hull condition.

Special purpose vessel (120 m)

Figure A. 16: Added resistance diagram for 120 m Special purpose vessel with different fouling conditions

Figure A. 17: Percentage increase in CF values and PE values of 120 m Special purpose vessel with respect to the smooth hull condition.

LNG carrier

Figure A. 18: Added resistance diagram for 270 m LNG carrier with different fouling conditions.

Figure A. 19: Percentage increase in CF values and PE values of 270 m LNG carrier with respect to the smooth hull condition.