qir000812

Upload: jcasafranca

Post on 03-Jun-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 QIR000812

    1/4

    mity coefficient should be done by conducting field experiments

    in future.

    References

    Capra, A., and Scicolone, B. 2004. Emitter and filter test for waste-

    water reuse by drip irrigation. Agric. Water Manage., 682, 135

    149.

    Christiansen, J. E. 1942. Hydraulics of sprinkler systems for irriga-

    tion. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 107, 221239.Duran-Ros, M., Puig-Barques, J., Arbat, G., Barragan, J., and de

    Cartagena, F. R. 2009. Effect of filter, emitter and location on clog-

    ging when using effluents. Agric. Water Manage., 961, 6779.

    ISO.2003. ISO/TC 23/SC 18/WG5 N4: Clogging test methods for emit-

    ters, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

    Li, G. Y., Wang, J. D., Alam, M., and Zhao, Y. F. 2006. Influence of

    geometrical parameters of labyrinth flow path of drip emitters on hy-

    draulic and anticlogging performance. Trans. ASABE, 493, 637

    643.

    Nakayama, F. S., and Bucks, D. A. 1986. Trickle irrigation for crop

    productionDesign, operation, and management developments in ag-

    ricultural engineering, 9 , Elsevier, New York.

    Wei, Q. S., et al. 2008a. Evaluations of emitter clogging by two-phase

    flow simulations and laboratorial experiments. Comput. Electr. Eng.,

    632, 294303.Wei, Q. S., Shi, Y. S., Dong, W. C., and Huang, S. H.2006a. Advanced

    methods to develop drip emitters with new channel types.Appl. Eng.

    Agric., 222, 243249.

    Wei, Q. S., Shi, Y. S., Dong, W. C., Lu, G., and Huang, S. H. 2006b.

    Study on hydraulic performance of drip emitters by computational

    fluid dynamics. Agric. Water Manage., 8412, 130136.

    Wei, Q. S., Shi, Y. S., Lu, G., Dong, W. C., and Huang, S. H. 2008b.

    Rapid evaluations of anticlogging performance of drip emitters by

    laboratorial short-cycle tests. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 1343, 298304.

    Wu, I. P. 1997. An assessment of hydraulic design of micro-irrigation

    systems. Agric. Water Manage., 323, 275284.

    Wu, I. P., Lin, B. Y., and Lau, L. S. 1991. Plugging evaluation in the

    reuse of sewage effluent by drip irrigation. Proc., ASCE National

    Conf., Honolulu.

    Discussion of Method of Solution ofNonuniform Flow with the Presence ofRectangular Side Weir byMaurizio Venutelli

    November/December 2008, Vol. 134, No. 6, pp. 840846.

    DOI: 10.1061/ASCE0733-94372008134:6840

    Ali R. Vatankhah1

    and M. Bijankhan2

    1Asst. Prof., Irrigation and Reclamation Eng. Dept., Univ. College of

    Agriculture and Natural Resources, Univ. of Tehran, P.O. Box 4111,Karaj, Iran 31587-77871. E-mail: [email protected]

    2M.Sc. Student, Irrigation and Reclamation Eng. Dept., Univ. College of

    Agriculture and Natural Resources, Univ. of Tehran, P.O. Box 4111,

    Karaj, Iran 31587-77871. E-mail: [email protected]

    The discussers would like to thank the author for presenting an

    iterative step method for solving the spatially varied flow equa-

    tion with decreasing discharge. The discussers, however, would

    like to add a few points.

    The proposed iterative step method incorporates the variations

    along the side weir, of the specific energy due to the bottom and

    friction slope, of the weir coefficient, and of the velocity distri-

    bution coefficient. The results, in comparison with experimental

    data and with the solutions obtained assuming constant specific

    energy, are also presented.

    To improve the solution, the author incorporates the variations

    along the side weir for different parameters, but for achieving a

    direct integration of the spatially varied flow equation, these pa-

    rameters have been assumed constant for the computational weir

    segmentsx. In this case, the accuracy of the proposed analyti-cal solution is influenced. Considering constant energy along the

    computational weir segment causes c1 =0. Thus, this parameter

    can be omitted in the proposed analytical solution. In such a case,

    the solution reduced to the solution proposed by De Marchi

    1934. Also since x0 the application of Eq. 22 or Eq. 23

    in the original paper requires a tedious trial and error procedure.

    Suitable Governing Equation

    For a short weir, the hypothesis of constant specific energy along

    the side weir is acceptable Sf= S0. Considering this assumption

    and assuming

    =1, the nonlinear ordinary differential equationgoverning spatially varied flow with decreasing discharge takes

    the form

    dy

    dx=

    4CW

    3WEyyp3

    3y 2E1

    Muslu 2001 derived the weir coefficient for subcritical flow

    conditions in the case ofx= 0

    CW= 0.611

    31 0.036

    2E

    /

    y 1y/

    E 2 2

    An analytical solution of Eq. 1 is not possible for variable weir

    coefficient. In this case, Eq. 1 can be numerically integratedwith the aid of any mathematical software such as MathCad,

    Maple, or Mathematica.

    To verify Eq. 1, it is referred to the experimental observa-tions carried out by Hager1982and mentioned by the author. Incurrent research, specific energy at the control section is consid-

    ered a constant for numerical integration of Eq. 1. The com-puted and measured values are given in Table 1 together with

    computed values by Muslu 2001. In comparison with the au-

    thors solution, the numerical integration method gives better re-

    sults as indicated by the standard error values. Discharges and

    flow depths calculated in the current study are also shown in Fig.1. As seen, the predicted values are in good agreement with the

    measured ones.

    Alternative Governing Equation

    Considering =1, subcritical depth in a rectangular canal can be

    determined by the inversion of the specific energy equation as

    Chanson 1999

    812 / JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2009

    Downloaded 10 Nov 2010 to 217.218.49.8. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright. Visithttp://www.ascelibrary.org

  • 8/12/2019 QIR000812

    2/4

    y=E13

    +2

    3cos1

    3cos11 27Q2

    4gw2E3 3

    Using Eq. 8 of the original paper

    dx= 3

    2CW2gy p3/2dQ 4

    Substituting Eqs. 2 and 3 in Eq. 4 yields

    dx= fQ,w,p,EdQ 5

    where ffunction ofQ,w, p , and E. For a given problem,w and

    pconstant. Assuming constant specific energy along the side

    weir, this nonlinear ordinary differential equation can be numeri-

    cally solved for Q. As seen, in such a case, S0 and Sf does not

    appear in the differential equation. After determining Q, y can be

    calculated by Eq. 3. It should be noted that predicted values byEq. 3 are the same as those by Eq. 1.

    Conclusion

    Considering a variable weir coefficient, the classical hypothesis

    about constant specific energy is still acceptable for a short side

    weir and for subcritical flow conditions. In this case, there is not

    an analytical solution for the governing equation, and numericalintegration methods can be used for solving the equation. It

    should be noted that considering the term ofSf-S0 in the govern-

    ing equation reduces the accuracy of the predicted values in the

    case of constant specific energy. As shown, S0 and Sf can be

    omitted from the governing equation. Also predicted values

    Table 1 show =1 is acceptable in the computations.

    Table 1. Experimental Verification of Simple Numerical Solution E=Cons. and = 1 Using Data of Hager 1998

    Distance from upstream

    end of the weir m

    Depth of flow cm Rate of flowl/s

    Measured

    Computed by

    Muslu 2001

    Computed by

    discussers Measured

    Computed by

    Muslu 2001

    Computed by

    discussers

    Run E

    0.0 19.20 19.30 19.16 38.87 36.93 37.88

    0.2 19.31 19.64 19.54 35.49 34.38 35.20

    0.4 19.88 19.98 19.91 31.97 31.36 32.04

    0.6 20.50 20.30 20.27 28.44 27.97 28.37

    0.8 20.78 20.61 20.59 24.23 23.95 24.191.0 20.88 20.88 20.88 19.52 19.52 19.52

    ry =0.19890 ry =0.16994 rQ =1.06462 rQ =0.46381

    Run F

    0.0 24.36 24.59 24.49 39.79 40.12 41.21

    0.2 24.48 24.83 24.76 35.79 37.1 38.01

    0.4 24.92 25.06 25.02 32.40 33.86 34.45

    0.6 25.32 25.29 25.27 28.70 30.13 30.54

    0.8 25.55 25.50 25.49 25.67 26.12 26.28

    1.0 25.69 25.69 25.69 21.70 21.7 21.7

    ry =0.19920 ry =0.14926 rQ =1.11391 rQ =1.72656

    Run G

    0.0 17.72 18.12 17.95 39.06 39.20 40.07

    0.2 17.43 18.36 18.23 38.82 37.88 38.61

    0.4 18.61 18.63 18.53 36.40 36.22 36.86

    0.6 18.27 18.90 18.84 34.46 34.35 34.80

    0.8 18.95 19.18 19.15 31.92 32.14 32.39

    1.0 19.46 19.46 19.46 29.60 29.60 29.60

    ry =0.54316 ry =0.46135 rQ =0.44634 rQ =0.56786

    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2009 /813

    Downloaded 10 Nov 2010 to 217.218.49.8. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright. Visithttp://www.ascelibrary.org

  • 8/12/2019 QIR000812

    3/4

    References

    Chanson, H. 1999. The hydraulics of open channel flows: An introduc-

    tion, 1st Ed., Edward Arnold, London.De Marchi, G. 1934. Saggio di teoria del funzionamento degli stra-

    mazzi laterali. Energ. Elettr., 1111, 849860 in Italian.

    Hager, W. H. 1982. Die hydraulik von verteilkanlen. Teil 12, Mit-

    teilungen der Versuchsanstalt fr Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glazi-

    ologie, No. 5556, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Muslu, Y. 2001. Numerical analysis for lateral weir flow. J. Irrig.

    Drain. Eng., 1274, 246253.

    Fig. 1. Depths of flow and discharges computed and observed along the side weir using data of Hager 1998

    814 / JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2009

    Downloaded 10 Nov 2010 to 217.218.49.8. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright. Visithttp://www.ascelibrary.org

  • 8/12/2019 QIR000812

    4/4

    Closure to Method of Solutionof Nonuniform Flow with the Presenceof Rectangular Side Weir by MaurizioVenutelli

    November/December 2008, Vol. 134, No. 6 , pp. 840846.

    DOI: 10.1061/ASCE0733-94372008134:6840

    Maurizio Venutelli1

    1Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Universit di Pisa, Via Gabba 22,

    I-56126 PISA. E-mail: [email protected]

    The author would like to thank the discussers for their interest

    in the paper. The writer is of an opinion that it is practically

    impossible incorporate all the parameters in the general integral

    of Eq.15. Therefore, has proposed an method in which the weir

    coefficient Cw and the velocity distribution coefficient are as-

    sumed constant in the step weir segment x. At contrary, the

    bottom slope So and the energy slope Sfare integrated explicitly.

    However, it is important to notice the better results obtained by

    the discussers with Cwvariable, from the numerical integration of

    the basic ordinary differential equation of the De Marchis theory.

    On the other hand, as it can be verified, for all test cases pre-

    sented, on side weir with a length of 1 m, we have a Froudenumber Fr0.6. The results obtained by the discussers confirm,

    as indicate theoretically by De Marchi 1934and experimentally

    by Gentilini 1938 and Collinge 1957, that for short side weir

    and for subcritical flow conditions, the validity of constant energy

    and of the coefficient of velocity distribution equal to 1. But if

    these hypotheses are not verified, De Marchis theory show seri-

    ous disagreement from the experimental results Hager and

    Volkart 1986. For a reasonable accuracy, the friction gradient

    and, for any weir segment an appropriate value of distribution

    velocity and weir coefficients are take into account in the pro-

    posed model.

    Energy losses, in particular for supercritical flow, produce pro-

    files above the De Marchis solution and in good agreement with

    the observed values as shown in Fig. 6. Under this flow condi-

    tions, in accordance with the recent study of Durga Rao and Pillai

    2008on several test cases, the values of the differences from the

    bottom and the energy slopetermc1in the paperare significant.Moreover, as been observed by El-Khashab and Smith 1976forsubcritical flow the value of, as a consequence of the nonuni-

    form velocity distribution, becomes very high towards the end of

    the weir. This aspects, as can be see from Fig. 4, is evaluated inthe paper by Hagers model for rectangular channel of Eq. 7.

    The effects of the variations of along the side weir are exam-

    ined in details in the works of Lee and Holley 2002 and Mayet al. 2003.

    In conclusion, the versatility of Eq. 22 or 23 allows tocompute, for wholly subcritical and wholly supercritical flow pro-

    files, the longitudinal variations of the bottom and energy slope,

    and the longitudinal variations of the weir coefficient and of the

    velocity distribution coefficient continuously and step by step,

    respectively.

    References

    Durga Rao, K. H. V., and Pillai, C. R. S. 2008. Study of flow over side

    weirs under supercritical conditions. Water Resour. Manage., 22,

    131143.

    El-Khashab, A., and Smith, K. V. H. 1976. Experimental investigations

    of flow over side weirs. J. Hydr. Div., 1029, 12551268.

    Lee, K.-L., and Holley, E. R. 2002. Physical modeling for side-channel

    weirs. CRWR Online Rep. 02-2, Center for Research in Water Re-

    sources, Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex.

    May, R. W. P., Bromwich, B. C., Gasowski, Y., and Rickard, C. E.

    2003. Hydraulic design of side weirs, Thomas Telford, London.

    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING ASCE / NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2009 /815

    Downloaded 10 Nov 2010 to 217 218 49 8 Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright Visithttp://www ascelibrary org